Thanks for such detailed analysis, T. I'm so glad there are people with tenacious, intelligent patience enough to run down the endless rabbit holes of our chaotic existence. You clearly are a handful of things, but boring ain't one of 'em. Glad to have found you 🌹
Haha, 'not boring' is high praise coming from you, Johnny. And thanks for the shout-out on your post, I'll comment there too.
But let's not quibble about petty things like undisclosed AI and censorship. Let's go to the true mortal sin of Unbekoming: did you catch his abuse of the ellipses in his 2022 writing? "I love Brett and so happy that he has come out on the right side of the argument on vax risk, but…he, like many others, is wrong on a very important point."
Wow…you exposed many of the fraudulent “medical freedom” peeps.👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
As far as Miz Latypova, I had the pleasure of meeting her in person at the Weston A Price Wise Traditions conference in Salt Lake City in October. I went up to her and introduced myself. She was rather prickly and not friendly at all, and I could tell, she really didn’t want to interact with me. (I was mostly talking to her about a painting of her’s that I bought and had framed and was complimenting as to how much I liked the painting.) This was from someone who was a featured speaker at an event of over 1500 plus people.
Then a day later I walked up on an ‘interaction’ that she was having with Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey about what they had allegedly said about her in one of their talks. (The Bailey’s were featured speakers at this event as well.) Miz Latypova perceived that what The Bailey’s had said, was a slam against her.
The interaction was not friendly or cordial whatsoever. Finally Mark Bailey took Sam’s arm and they walked away.
Wow, you bought one of her pricy paintings and she still didn't want to interact with you! You definitely deserve to put 'pleasure of meeting' in quotes. I don't know if the password reset is related, but it sure is creepy.
Yes the painting was a 9” x 12” oil for $250 (not framed). She made no connection to my name, as a buyer of her artwork. Is she so successful selling them she has no recollection who buys her work? Does she not keep track of a piece and who buys it?
I used to buy a lot of original artwork for my clients when I was an interior designer. Galleries and Artist Reps always kept track of who purchased the artwork!
She definitely has a prickly way about her. She’s not the cozy or friendly type at all.
It is very creepy about the password deal.
I had no reason to reset my Weston A Price password today! 🕵🏼♀️
As an artist you have to keep a record of who buys your work in case you need to borrow it for a retrospective or some pompous thing. at least they tell you that in art school. and general it is good business habit. so you can tell those who like your work when you are having a show. there s always a sign up list.
Having been in the design/interior design business for over 40 years, and the peripheral gallery/museum art scene I am aware of this system.
I realize this art thing for Ms. Latypova is just a ‘side hustle’ and she doesn’t make her living as an artist. I like her work her oil paintings and watercolors. I just think it’s strange that she doesn’t really keep track of who is buying her art. I also sent her a photo of the framed piece, to her website and she never responded back. It’s like she takes the money and then hasta luego! She does promote her art work on her Substack, after all!
It would be Nice, to have a team. because painting takes Time. writing also takes time. (not to mention keeping you own affairs in order day to day) maybe there are 2 of her. and two assistants. sometimes she seems disciplined and controlled, others emotionally unhinged. Often public personas would seem to take identical twins to accomplish all that they do, at minimum. this is not even taking in to account any social life at all. pets. emergencies. (recent storms come to mind) .
Well, not loving intruding on your nice convo here, I am going to for two reasons. First, I agree Arte, she sure gets a lot done for one person. Second, Frontera, I used to be really impressed with Sasha's artwork when she first began posting them; the subjects were very unlike my perception of artist/scientist who created them. Here's a weird admission: I was jealous of her brains/talent/inexhaustible energy and began to feel inadequate. Then I felt, because I was done squeezing all the bullshit out of The Great Lie, I just stopped looking at her stuff.
Anyhow, I also began to think her stuff is AI created and then - well, like if you wanted to order a "masterpiece oil" of a replica Rembrandt - had it painted. I'm probably wrong, but maybe not.
I've gone by a couple variations of "Amy" since nov 2020, I've read your comments for a long time. But you have been much more active. -A
This is very interesting. I was there too in SLC for WAPF conference. I had a very interesting experience with Sash here on SS. I thought about talking to her about it in SLC. I passed her in the vendor hall post her talk- which I did not attend. When I passed her I looked at her and thought I should bring up our interaction online and ask if she would like to actually say it to my face? Then I thought maybe this cold human just needs a hug? Maybe I should ask if she needs a hug? By the way she attacks people online I thought she might punch me in my face at WAPF whether I brought up our interaction here on SS or took a pic with her and hugged her.
I don’t trust the woman. Many love her. But actions speak louder than words for me. I like the Baileys. They were very well spoken. It was overall a wonderful conference! I look forward to next year!
Well from witnessing the little ‘exchange’ that she had with The Baileys, the last morning of the conference, I would venture to say that if you had gone up to her, introduced yourself as the person she had a ‘thing’ with on Substack, it might not have gone well, for you. Or she could have just dismissed you and not even engaged. That is her ‘energy’. She is not cozy, she is not warm. I just want to say that there were a couple of other “well known” terrain theory guys who are doctors, who spoke at the conference, who are not warm or extending of themselves, either. The Baileys were very gracious and kind. So were Josh and Adam Bigelsen, of the Bigelsen Academy. They were great guys, willing to engage and chat. I really enjoyed the conference, and all the people I met there, but don’t know if I want to go across the country next Fall to Washington DC. I’m not really enjoying the process of going to airports, the security check in deal, and flying for hours on a plane these days. If I do, would be to go to a tropical locale and sit on a beach and swim in warm water.
Hee! Hee! Do I dare? Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan. The irony is that Dr. Cowan, when he lived in California, in the Bay Area, my good friends who live in Sebastopol took their then young daughter (now in her 30’s) to Dr. Cowan. She had some issues with her hearing, which led to learning disabilities. My friends are organic, holistic, hippie types, who didn’t vaccinate their three children and they all went to Waldorf schools.
That’s why they went to Dr. Cowan because he was into holistic medicine. I introduced myself to him, and mentioned that we have a bit of a “three degrees of separation” connection, through my friends and their daughter who was his patient years ago. He mumbled a few words like “that’s interesting” and stopped talking. I could tell it was my cue to leave.
It’s not so much what they say, it’s the vibe that they project, their persona that I noticed. And neither one were that great at giving these ‘talks’. Their talks, though filled with some good info, were quite lackluster to me. I prefer to listen to engaging speakers, who also have good stuff to say. Just because one is knowledgeable in a subject doesn’t necessarily translate into being a good public speaker about it.
I had a much different experience with Cowan. When I met him I found both he and his wife to be very personable. Not only that, he was incredibly generous with his time. It was a different environment though - not at a large conference, which certainly could make a difference.
And I LOVED my first pilates session! Who knew that breathing could be an abdominal exercise? She also diagnosed something I've been living with for months as the sciatica nerve in my deltoid, which now makes total sense. And showed that my inability to do inverts in aerial isn't lack of core strength but tight hamstrings. I'm now flossing my teeth laying on the ground with my legs at a right angle on the wall ;-) I will definitely keep going back.
Well it could be that you are after all ‘a known Substacker’!
😉📝
People know who you are, what you do and what you write about! And it’s likely the Cowans knew of you and your Substack.
I am just a person attending a WAP conference , who had friends in CA that took their young daughter to see him in SF years ago, when he had a ‘medical practice’ there. 🤔
Oh and a PS: I loved the electric car/AC/DC meme today! I shared it around a bit.
Kaufman has been representing a paradigm against the possibility of viral caused chronic illness since the 1990's. (Maybe even 1980's). He is discussed in Hilary Johnson's famous book "Oslers Web". Harvard has been gatekeeping this issue since deep into the previous century, promoting and popularizing the idea that patients are crazy or to blame for their condition while simultaneously benefitting from the biomedical data extracted from the patients. There is a separation of roles between Harvard and Stanford. Stanford collecting cytokine profiles from patients (alternatively diagnosed as effected by: HHV-6, EBV, XMRV, ME/CFS) then Boston Biotechnology utilizes and exports this data on the markets as diagnostic assays. Harvard is a sort of gatekeeper in that people like Kaufman promoted the idea of psychological etiology in the face of evidence of viral infection. In order for people to appreciate my position: I'm not dogmatic about viruses or antiviral treatments. The true scientific alternative to to a dogmatic adherence to viruses is called "nutritional balancing" and hopefully there were HTMA (Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis) representatives at the WAP conference. Either the path of addressing viral infection or ignoring the concept of virus and utilizing HTMA can be beneficial pathways to address chronic illness from COVID. ignoring each of these and promoting some amorphous "terrain theory" concept is dishonest and most likely part of a planned distraction campaign. HTMA is a science with loads of data and testimony behind it for decades as well as popular campaigns against it in published medical journal articles. If "terrain theory" had any validity then it's practitioners will be honest and admit the HTMA foundation upon which they must stand for efficacy. Prescribing minerals (trace minerals, shilajit etc.) in the absence of a hair lab analysis is just irresponsible blind experimentation.
There were not any HTMA people at the WAP conference. It is something that I have heard about as an accurate assessment tool to help determine what is going on in the body of any given person.
Thank you for your insightful comment.
Oh and where might one find a practitioner or lab that does HTMA analysis? I am in SoCA.
Kaufman is easy to pick out as a disinformation agent, from my experience. His ‘meteoric rise’ through the ranks of the medical ‘truth scene’ is extremely suspect. I watched every bit of it. He just happens to begin speaking out during the pandemic, not before? Silly. People should have a higher bar for their discernment. Kaufman appeared on the fucking Alex Jones show for a time. Come on people, that's a massive red flag.
Plenty of red flags with Cowan too. Just one being, his characterizing David Icke as an old friend. Icke is one of the ultimate gate keepers in all this. Icke was a professional goal keeper by the way. Not a coincidence. Look at how many phony personalities from the medical truth scene connect to David Icke!
I only recently got into Kaufman. I watched some of his stuff, but stopped. Then I listened to a talk he gave at the Wise Traditions Conference in SLC, and I really was not impressed. I could have delivered a better presentation with his material than he did. The thing I have with a number these “medical freedom” peeps now, they ALL are about the monetizing of their “brand”, which is them. They want to sell you this, that, and the other supplement or treatment plan.
I know they have to make money now somehow, since they left their professions, and have re-invented themselves.
A number of them have linked themselves up with The Wellness Company, as their sponsor of their podcasts. TWC was started and is owned by Foster Coulson. Well we all know about him and his background. His family was in the engineered wood business, and branched off from there. He is a “serial entrepreneur/experienced innovator” investing in markets and areas of interest that he knows will make him money. So why not a “wellness company” in the throws of a Scamdemic? Then he lured in Dr. Peter McCullough, and other ‘medical freedom’ doctor luminaries and such, and went on to sponsor other “medical freedom influencers” like Naomi Wolf and others who now schlock TWS products on their podcasts for $$$.
Oh and about David Icke…years ago a friend who was all into Icke recommended that I take a listen to him. Something about the guy, never cared for him or what he had to say. Quite frankly I am more interested these days in the lesser known, less heard voices here on Substack, like Tereza C. They still seem to have a foot in reality and are seeking the truth about the subjects they focus on.
That is very flattering, but I don’t think that’s the case lol. I’m glad you enjoyed the memes…I have a good time collecting them - and I feel like every chuckle is a personal 🖕🫵 to the murderers of the world.
Thank you for the dedication and effort to document the frauds.As an old warhorse in battling the Biotech Mafia most of these meddlers get little of my attention or engagement beyond passing comments in Substack threads. What disturbed me most was the fact that what was a Substack feature of noting that comments were deleted by the author the comments here disappeared without a trace. What that does is turn an interactive discussion platform into a tool of pure propaganda.
In my first engagement with Sasha in Doc Malik's post of an interview about opoid deaths by Mark Kulacz comments were restricted to paid subs only so I sprung for the $5 to subscribe and add my feedback. Sasha then blocked me Doc Malik refunded my fee and bloocked me but my comments were noted as deleted. Very little stands out as fraud more quickly than censorship and the fact that these folks are beyond criticism evokes the old adage that if you want to know who rules you just look to who you cannot criticize.
This crowd are the new variant of Rockefeller - Gates Biotech Mafia who will not let the discussion of novel proteins in GMO ingredients be they genetically modified plants or mRNA Transfections come into question because humans NEVER tolerate tier patent protected mutants and the fortunes built on the idea of playing God with genes is deadly. They are all on the same team hiding the basic truths in a scheme of dying for profits.
Thanks for first letting me know about this, Pamela, and connecting me to others who were watching. I'll repeat here that when I mentioned your name, Tonika said you were 'the real deal' and Margaret Anna Alice said you were the Nancy Drew of conspiracies ;-)
I picked up on that too, that no italicized 'comment deleted' showed up. I know that Sasha's deleted comments on my stack still show her thumbprint. The author has an option to remove, but I thought that still left a record. There's 'ban user' but I was still able to post comments, that were subsequently removed.
I wonder if UB is inside Substack. Maybe IS Substack. I'll have to try the remove button sometime and see.
I've talked privately to Ahmad about Sasha, so he's heard my arguments but just thinks she has a temper. I decided not to listen to that interview because I knew I wouldn't be able to keep from commenting. I did post a link to my episode, with something like 'for a different view on Sasha.' I didn't go back and see if it was taken down. It really bothers me that he'd take down yours.
Everything that was not flattering was deleted without a trace and kudos for flagging that goes to a hawk eyed friend it was not my find. Jay Couey also had a link to a stream about Sasha & daughter Soph that was deleted along with Stella Marris 100% image thing that was under Jay's link.. on the bright side people let you know they are dirtbags by these actions so it save time puzzling about finding truth in their content.. little more revolting than working for murderous powers.
''They are all on the same team hiding the basic truths in a scheme of dying for profits. ''
I liked that comment Pamela. Alt/awake is a lucrative business space with millions of potential customers. I too have discovered many 'freedom' proponents have no issue deleting and blocking legitimate accounts/comments.
I am 100% with you, Tereza re both of them. Although I have to admit I still keep an eye on SL’s work. Even though she is such a crass individual, and she never misses an opportunity to insult me and many others. At some point I thought she cannot go lower but she proves me wrong regularly.
She is a liability to any credible or intelligent people.
I moved on from Lies long ago. They are lies as you say. I hope you don’t pay them, if yes, you might consider a charge back. His letter to his kids is a weak and rather stupid copy of an outstanding letter of another non anonymous man. It was circulating in awake communities. It was brilliant. I should have saved it. Same title very different and intelligent content. When I saw Lies letter when it came out, I smelled a rat. And then even though I was not up to date with AI and its usage info, I sensed deception in their work, so I moved on.
Our most precious asset, after our data, is our attention. I don’t give (try not to) mine to thieves.
I am glad that others corroborated my intuition!
Re AMD, they also stink - mixes a lot of lies and misinformation with truths and the ppl blindly trust them.
I think it is a data collection effort.
Their constant self congratulations and ego polishing in their lengthy - AI from the start - articles was off putting, and didn’t feel genuine. Especially because given their early subjects, I realised they follow (I think they recently discovered) the trailblazers I’ve also been following (for a decade) yet they NEVER named them rather presented everything as their own knowledge, using their (the trailblazers’) refs and sources! Red flag. The individual behind is an ego maniac cheater.
I also never trusted SS (<- are we aware of how we abbreviate SUB-stack, and how we use the term SUBs - are we all subs? To whom exactly?) so I don’t pay anyone here because I don’t want to give my data to anyone, not even to you Tereza. All I use (email, or names etc) are aliases. I don’t create content, and I don’t care if I am taken for an anonymous troll.
So interesting, yulia, on the data collection. You prompted me to think that AI is systematic word theft. With Eisenstein and the toxic boys who stole my phrase, there's a record of where they got it. But with AI, the author is erased. The 150 likes were enough to show it was a marketable commodity. And the idea it captured is left behind--as Eisenstein and the boyz also did.
SS has a checkbox in the settings where you can opt out of having your content used as an AI learning model, but they tell you it might be used anyway. I think we are, perhaps, THE primary AI learning database. Where else would you have so many writers feeding their words into the machine?
It's funny that at 3 am, UB refunded the $22 left on my $33 subscription. I'd noticed that he was subbed to me, so that didn't take long. I don't monetize anything, so you couldn't pay me anyway. I don't want a two-tier system or to think about whether I'd lose subs for anything I said. Curious that UB's subs have gone up in 4 months to $50.
I'm very glad you're keeping an eye on SL's work! Once you know that someone's in on the scam, it's especially important to see what their agenda really is. Why are they giving you the 90% of deep dive truth and where do they slip in the 10% they want you to swallow?
Someone named Geraldine May sent me an angry email saying I was doing a great disservice to the TRUTH to question either UB or SL. First, I told her it was cowardly to critique someone privately rather than in the public venue where it was posted. Then I wrote: "If you look at the eight points I list, are you saying that none of them are important? Certainly you agree that Unbekoming couldn’t do all this without AI, yes? Is it honest that he’s never admitted that? Or that he censors comments but also censors any comments that say he censors? If censoring is nothing to be ashamed of, why doesn’t he want anyone to know he’s doing it?
"It’s a very curious thing, Geraldine. Apparently, you aren’t at all critical of Sasha calling myself and others turds, twats, cretins, faggots, pussies, mentally retarded, toxic and stupid trash, and an ' insufferable postmenopausal, lonely, dissatisfied cunt’. Do you use that language?
"Yet you’re upbraiding me because I dare to question Sasha—not call her names, not tell her she’s lucky I don’t kill her, but merely quote her.
"You’ve been doing the same research for 10 yrs and so have all the other speakers you mention. Do you not care what kind of morality a person has as long as they publicize your points? That seems like a short term strategy to me. What happens when your vaccine research become publicly associated with someone who applauds their daughter’s death threats, recruitment of school shooters and posts saying ‘Kill all Muslims, it’s a public service’? You will be discredited and dismissed, along with your spokesperson.
"I don’t think you need to compromise. There are plenty of smart people with integrity who are making your points."
So YES, Sasha is a liability to the points she's making, not an asset. In the UB 'interview', something has the acronym ATUM and she mentions that's an Egyptian god. Now, I know that because I'm researching 4th millennium Egypt for my book, and how the goddess symbology was taken over by the motherfucking hieros/ Aryans. Atum was a big part of that. But it was very curious that Sasha would know this tidbit, which is part of the Illuminati/ Free Mason origin story. Interesting, eh?
I will add another observation abt SL. I may have mentioned this before.
I see a strange discrepancy between her written language skills as seen in her posts and sometimes replies to comments (which is clear, articulate and succinct) and her oral language skills (or lack thereof) which is disorganised and poor.
When she presents with support material (slide or notes) she’s good and articulate but in interviews (whether host or interviewee) where spontaneous reasoning is needed, she is more often than not embarrassingly disarticulate. I don’t mean her accent, I mean her content.
I am a nonnative speaker in an international environment where we are all multilingual but I rarely see this big of a discrepancy.
After all, she talks about the subjects she researches and writes about so one would expect her being able to tell about that same work verbally yet I find her searching for arguments, laughing strangely, having disorganised sentences, not finishing one and going to many directions… etc.
And her followers love it? It’s sooo very bizarre to me.
That's a cogent point, yulia. I haven't listened to interviews of her. I didn't think I could do that on Doc Malik's without needing to comment--and since he gifted me the paid sub and knows my research on Sasha, I thought I would refrain.
But it sounds like Ahmad censored paid sub Pamela Drew when she did comment. In writing this episode, I jotted down a title on UB & Sasha as bot meets bot. And then thought, 'Naaah ...' But that would explain a LOT.
I didn’t listen to that one either as I actively dislike both of them, as you know :))
Btw, has your follow up interview with him been published yet?
Comment censoring is a red flag.
I dislike and don’t trust Malik. I have a long list of issues with him. I don’t actively think he works for the other side, but he’s sooo dumb (so can be a tool for them) and is another ego maniac. Just listen to his early interviews and you will see it. He’s like a female SL in his interviews and he makes everything about himself.
He’s also too busy to wanting to make money and please the crowds for my taste.
Yes, I get tired of the self-congratulatory tone and the blame of others for not doing what he did. I'm not sure how many podcasters the dissident community can support, so I think he should be glad they didn't.
We're supposed to do a third interview in March, which won't be behind a paywall. He does take my ideas seriously, and that's been rare in my life. Although I don't think I've ever changed his mind.
I also keep finding him quoting my research and even definitions, like of anarchy, without mentioning me. He did a recent interview of James Corbett, which was very stiff, like neither one really wanted to do it but thought they should. They're talking about gov't and solutions, and Ahmad says, 'There's a book that you have to read.' I don't bother to get excited. He tells him about Meredith Miller's account of generational trauma and how that's trained us all to be obedient to gov't.
Now, I don't know that James had a traumatic childhood--Reportage says he didn't, which Ahmad was interviewing him about. Most people obey gov't because the bankers own all the houses and we can't live in one without making money. If Ahmad could explain how a non-traumatized person could get away with that, I'd love to hear it.
On the other hand, I've developed the perfect anarchist economic system, as I repeatedly tell both of them. Why isn't Ahmad bringing up my book? It was the perfect opportunity.
But for someone who calls himself an anarchist, Ahmad still thinks the State needs to intervene to take children away from mothers. That was the basis of our argument. If you trust the State more than mothers to care about the wellbeing of their children, I don't know what kind of anarchist you are.
It would be interesting to ask Malik directly why he doesn’t mention you when he cites your work (he’s the type to copy left right centre), and why he didn’t recommend or just mention your book if he thinks so highly about your work? Rather recommends a non relevant one.
In any case I trust that sooner or later you will see what I see re Malik.
Your perspective on obedience linked to mortgage is very west/Anglo-Saxon centric. But the anglo Saxon world is the minority!
It’s different in the East - where I currently reside.
One country I know and know for sure that generational trauma has been shaping obedience with regards to government is Russia. But it’s never black and white. People learn to go around the system but the trauma runs deep and does have a paralysing effect.
I can’t much elaborate as I am travelling and hate typing on a small device!
To my mind, AI is worse than word theft. It’s identity theft.
All the opt outs are deceptive. I never believe them but I still opt out :))
In the UK ppl could opt up of their health data being shared with third parties yet they were shared…
Interesting re Lies’ refund. I am sure they read our thread and wanted to avoid the chargeback fees.
Yes re SL. And she’s a grifter too. She’s been steeling left and right and centre, even from me (lots of ideas) - haha. Not that I care, in fact it’s good as it lives on. She latched on different people and declared them her collaborators/colleagues.
She has zero integrity.
Jessica Hockett who was a late comer to SL’s work & vitriol (and who has now left SS for what it has become) has noticed all that was wrong with SL very quickly and put is succinctly, which I cannot reproduce here.
What’s also interesting in SL’s defence of her daughter’s “joke” is that Russian speakers know that “in every joke there’s a little bit of joke as well”. Meaning that a “joke” is a way to tell the truth in a palatable way.
Love your reply to Cowardine Geraldine who’s trying to chastise you in private.
Very interesting last point about her knowing of Atum.
I noticed that in conferences or in interviews when caring people genuinely worry for her safety or when ppl asks her if she’s ever worried about her safety, her reply is somewhat off. Of course, she’s never worried for her safety and her way of replying tells it all. She’s nonchalant, sardonic and mocking at the same time (hard to find the right words :) but my senses tell that’s not the way a normal person who stand alone would reply. It’s the response of a complicit. And, she never shows human like reactions to the person who cares and worries for her safety.
Curious that UB's intro subscription fee was $33, eh? Occult signaling?
Did you or someone else tell me that UB's letter to his sons was usurped from one that was much more coherent and better written? His version is jumpy and authority-based, not facts and logic. That changed my sense of him to realize even his early work was stealing the format and ideas of others.
That's an excellent point that this is stealing more than just words, but actually identity-theft of the author. That's so true! I had it backwards. By taking the term I'd coined, the Toxic Boyz became me, the author who came up with it. They put my identity on as a disguise over their meaning, which was a bro-fest. Instead of tonic masculinity as a healing relationship between men and women, it became toxic superiority--a men's club to which I wasn't even invited, except as someone celebrating their genius as a group defined by MY term. None of them even acknowledged me in their writing or speaking as 'the Tonic 10'.
So Eisenstein isn't just stealing words. He's become the great, deep thinker who came up with these ways to describe our common experience. He's become a prophet, a guru, a seer, a mystic. But there's no vision behind the pithy sayings because they didn't emanate from him. And the vision they did capture is erased, because the words are now a facade on an empty, shabby building.
Yes, I did mention that his letter was a poor attempt to copy another man’s wonderful letter. Here and elsewhere too. Maybe others did too.
The person behind UB seems to be rather mediocre (if not a bit dumb - hence the extensive AI usage); and before turning to AI (and following up on the commentators’ ideas and suggestions) they had not much idea on their own let alone skill to present them coherently.
Now that everybody uses AI (and many different AIs), only those who have true human intelligence and discernment will stand out. The rest will be/are the zombies and bots, like UB, the feeders and mindless readers.
I think that in the future (which is already here), the most valuable asset or ensemble of assets will be discernment, intuition and spiritual abilities, all which provide real knowing. Certainty not data or knowledge.
Re Eisenstein, I have nothing to add. If not that I never came across him before a few years ago when Alison brought it to my attention. (I’ve never had any interest in anything American let alone western wannabe gurus!) But thanks to Alison I had a look at him. And I got BAD vibes from him so never looked further. To me, he feels dirty, dirty inside. His eyes and gaze tells me he’s dirty and is working for the devil and not to be trusted. In fact, I cannot even fully hear what he says because of the vibe and all the warnings I am getting from him. Genuine teachers or spiritual persons (I know quite a few) send very different vibes.
Reading your experience with his character confirms my intuition.
To your final point - hmm… SL’s crassness is so off-putting, I’d rather get my info from someone else making similar points but behaving with grace and decorum on this public platform. Such weird contrast to her fabulous artwork. (At least, she’s been saying it’s her work…? Has she posted a video of her actually producing a painting? Because, even that could come under doubt now.)
Funny, that occurred to me too. I know I've seen a painting of soph from when she was young. I'd guess that they are, since there's no doubt she's brilliant. I think there's some kind of mind control cult in her upbringing, would be my guess.
And yes, I'm glad that yulia is keeping an eye on her so I don't have to ;-)
There’s something sinister in that verbal nastiness that contrasts so starkly with her scientific and artistic work. The way she attacks those who disagree in the slightest is like an rabid dog. Very unpleasant. (Fits right in with the current US government, come to think of it.)
SO interesting, Kathleen. I wrote the first chapter of my book on my theology of OneMind Dreaming. I call the chapter Time Out of Mind. Paul comes to the same conclusion, that the world we perceive is a dream. Towards the end, he says that the separate self perceiving doesn't exist, and is part of the dream. I love his Jung quote about the one sugar crystal that teaches the whole solution to be a crystal again.
I think Paul, Pam and others like The Secret lose consistency is in the logic. If this is all a dream, why do you need to control it? It's certainly good to have those synchronicities and miracles that remind you it's a dream, so you're not worrying. But it takes the opposite lesson if you then think you have to do the right things, 'get your mind right' in order to make things happen. Then you're not a victim, but you have to take responsibility that everything that happens you've done to yourself. It's a double-whammy.
The quantum physics explanation still comes back to physics as in physical reality. Your expectations make light a wave or a particle but once you've done that, it exists, it's reality. That's contrary to it being a dream with no real existence.
I've become particularly attuned to the hieros/ Aryan spells in language. Paul uses a few when he talks about superheroes [hieros] and 'mastering'. In effect, his theology makes each of us our own god, creating the world we see. What the Course says is that the use of mind is uncreative, unless we're thinking with God/dess. Nothing happens.
He also imagines evil trying to thwart him. Where does that come from if he hasn't created it? Overall, it seems very lonely to be taking responsibility for everything. It's been a relief feeling that 'I need do nothing.' And I do a LOT of nothing ;-)
Paul's first books were on Weitko -egregore-like life form that infiltrates humanity, particularly through the mind. A mind virus. He's not alone of course on that view.
His more recent work I think has evolved a bit and his focus is overall more on discovering agency in that kind of environment.
"The quantum physics explanation still comes back to physics as in physical reality. Your expectations make light a wave or a particle but once you've done that, it exists, it's reality. That's contrary to it being a dream with no real existence."
That's the thing that's really bubbling up now. Our intentions in the field definitely steer things - not perfectly of course - but even once those intentions result in manifestation at the physical level, we can have reality shifts (mandela effects) and they can change again. So the whole model is changing. I suspect it's tied to frequencies.
It suggests - it does to me - that the nature of physical reality is proving to be a lot less persistent than we previously thought.
The individuated self - experiencing separation - is in constant contradiction. It's nearly impossible to express via words how these two aspects interplay without creating logical roadblocks and/or dead-ends.
"What the Course says is that the use of mind is uncreative, unless we're thinking with God/dess. Nothing happens."
I agree with this - thinking with Source is alignment. In some ways the mess our planet is in is the result of what humans out of alignment do on their own. So something happens - you make a mess - but it can't sustain because it's hollowed out, the essence isn't included. And really when you include that essential of God/dess, that alignment comes naturally with a feeling of responsibility. They go hand in hand. At least that's how it seems. When we step out of alignment, we feel it and self-correct.
In some of his interviews he has said more clearly that this mind-virus is actually serving humanity. The catalyst that breaks us out of the illusion of our separateness.
Not sure I'm making much sense.
One thing I do know for sure - whatever it is you do or don't do - it's perfect.
Your comment section blew up! Sussing who to trust in this AI world is obviously on many people's minds. Best.
Thank you, Kathleen, I'm putting it at the top of my queue--and maybe I'll delete my other open tabs after I listen to it. But not Tonika's! I've been watching the Silent Theatre production of Lulu that launched her as a director. It's phenomenal, and it started as a college project: https://silenttheatre.substack.com/p/lulu-a-black-and-white-silent-play.
have been suspicious of “Lies” for quite a while now but follow to see what they (AI) are pushing.
all of them put DMSO on a pedestal (Lies,AMD, Kirsch)as a cure-all makes me thankful that I didn’t try it and wary that it makes your entire body a sponge for the aerosolized trans-human tech (EMF activated.)
is the nano aluminum really meant to cause widespread dementia & is the nano barium really meant to degrade our skeletal system?
spineless techno zombies?
maybe back in the day DMSO was effective with minimal risk … but now?
so anyone that promotes DMSO now without serious, explicit warning would also be on my radar.
have had a lot of unexplained technical difficulties after posting something on the “conspiracy” spectrum… including segments of comments “disappearing.”
at some point it will be impossible to communicate using demon-possessed AI.
way back when someone suggested that SL used daughter to respond to all comments.
You're so good at following these clues, kitten. No wonder you're on their radar. I always read what you post, even if I don't comment.
I don't know if soph would post that she's a 'gift from God' and how proud she is of her. That sounds like a mom who's trying to convince herself. I wonder if they got driven out of Marin. I remember that the students staged a walk-out in protest of how offensive soph's videos were. She did some vicious ones also cyber-bullying girls she perceived as mean, and the moms got together and alerted the school. Soph responded with a video acting like the moms were pedos to be lurking on her channel.
When she did her video on the gun range recruiting school shooters, that wasn't to be taken lightly.
I have to give it to you, for sussing this out. but some of us, (gavin mounsey) compiling a list of AI-writers. like the red blood journal, and unbecomming, and others. there is an impersonal taste they leave which is alienating. beyond the in-authenticity of non-disclosure. like i told the journal, AT least go through the article. If you are not dyslexic like me, you can see the errors. I need an editor. but i refuse to work with an ai from sheer hardheaded stubbornness. It's a character flaw i have.
If you have a link to Gavin's current list of AI writers, I'd love a link. I'm with you on that character flaw. Maybe it will change what we appreciate, the way that photography changed art from being merely representational. Writing that doesn't produce meaning, but is merely well crafted words, may no longer hold any sway. We can hope.
“Eisenstein as an intelligence asset wolf in sheep clothing”…I feel the same about Dr. Bob Malone…”wolf in sheep’s clothing” and the supreme grifter, who has “pulled the wool” over many people, one of them being A Midwestern Doctor who has large paid following here on Substack. I got into a little tete a tete with AMD about Malone last year. He considers Dr. Bob a “friend”. 🤔🙄
Yes, definitely true on Malone, as I have 27 episodes to attest. This one is good for looking at the overall tells that someone is a sheepdog sent to round up the strays and send them back to the slaughterhouse by a route called freedom: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malone-and-slaughterhouse-four.
I also did one on my conversation with AMD regarding Malone: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-psyops-cyclops. It VERY strangely got taken down by YT 21 mos after being posted, giving me another strike just when the first was about to expire. It cited dangerous misinformation at minute 24:32. That was a comment thread with the anonymous blogger, A Midwestern Doctor, where I had stated that Robert Malone's $21M BARDA contract to test repurposed drugs could have prevented Emergency Use Authorization by testing HCQ & IVM, stopping the vaccines before they started.
And my Mealy-Mouthed Malone video got taken down right before Malone's PsyWar lecture was posted and went to 1M views. So if he was the trigger, why didn't they sanction that? There's no doubt that Malone and AMD are in on the game.
Yes Dr. Bob and AMD are ‘buds’. And AMD was a bit tiffed that I called Dr. Bob a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”. “That’s not his experience” with Dr. Bob. Of course not, when “they are in on the same game”.
I had a conversation with her on one of her posts. I thought she was a man and she told me otherwise -this was two or three years ago. But who knows? Nothing is as it seems, especially these days.
So true! Nothing is at it seems. And then there’s so much spin on every f**king event that happens on a daily basis it’s no wonder that the left and right are at each others throats based upon the spin they watch or read.
Thanks, T. I had stopped reading UB a while back. My gut said it was largely AI, so good to read this. Not just because it confirms that, but because these are the murky waters we find ourselves in.
Separately, but related - I read recently in an RJ Spina book, that what he calls the EMI (Ego, Mind Identity) is basically AI. It was a new way, for me, to think of it. From that lens, conditioned minds and the identities attached to them, basically amount to AI. People regurgitate what they've been fed just like AI can only use what its been programed with. (Of course with humans, that can be rectified)
In a sense we've been living with A.I. long before it showed up in its current form.
I wonder, should enough people manage to see through and break free, what that will mean going forward for the 'external' manifestations of AI? Maybe it what's needed to put it in its proper place - which as you point out - has definite benefits.
Leave it to you, Kathleen, to go to the metaphysical--where you know I'll be thrilled to meet you! OMGdess, YES! Of course we're dealing with the OG AI with the ego-mind! What a brilliant connection for Spina to make.
Because I got so annoyed with translating God into Goddess in the Course, I've been back to the one-line meditations, which I'd once memorized and where that substitution makes ALL the difference. So the first ten are:
"What I see has no meaning. I have given what I see all the meaning it has for me. I do not understand anything I see. My thoughts have no meaning. I am never upset for the reasons I think. I am upset because I see what is not there. I see only the past. A meaningless world engenders fear. Goddess did not create a meaningless world. My thoughts are images that I have made."
It makes perfect sense that by making the artificial construct more systematized, it would make it easier to see and reject. Like everything else, the more they do to fuck us over, the more it backfires.
I have to add this comment. I just got an email two hours after I posted my comment earlier this afternoon, from the Weston A Price Foundation, notifying me about “my attempt to reset my password on the member dashboard” of their website. I never tried to reset my password on their website this afternoon! That’s so weird. I will have to call them to tomorrow. Is a particular “someone” under discussion here messing with me? 🤔🕵🏼♀️😣
Substack (like all social media) is owned and run by the DoD, using “fronts” and promotes hundreds of Intel agent accounts and Masons. They are everywhere… Crawling all over Substack writing endless drivel. Even pretending to squabble with each other: Team A versus Team B.
Meaning, if you criticize one of their more popular agents, one of the army ops team may try and mess with you.
At one time, I was getting notifications daily of login attempts on my Substack account.
I have commented on Unbekoming at least twice about the obvious AI used and got no reply. It was enough for me to know that it’s an intelligence operation. I have no time or way to vet every factoid in the articles so it’s just not worth my time to read- and it could influence me in a way that is more covert. Say NO to AI generated BS. It’s all a capture.
I really enjoyed this post and your video. I have been thinking for quite a while that Lies are Unbekoming had to be AI. First because there is so much content in a short time and second because the podcast voices are the same as on Google’s NotebookLM. Today, I asked Perplexity AI if there was evidence that it was. Perplexity said the was no solid evidence. Then I asked if anyone was saying there was, and it mentioned you. So here I am and I’m glad I found you.
I'm glad you found me too! And glad that AI led you to me! It is good for some things.
Interesting about the podcast voices--you must also be a paid sub since I think that's for paid subs only. The podcast style is so chatty and conversational, it was hard to believe that AI could do that. But I'd heard Unbekoming's voice in an early interview of someone from his work, and it was nothing like that polished professional host voice.
I listened to more than one to see if the voices changed. They didn't seem to. It's almost as if they want it to be obvious so that by the time it's revealed, you've already accepted it. Very clever really, to get all the people who are scrutinizing the encroaching technocracy and do fabulous summaries of all their conspiracy literature. Talk about cognitive dissonance!
Thanks for following Perplexity to me and responding!
There was a comment this morning on Lies are Unbekoming asking about using AI, since it seemed to the commenter that at least 80% was written by AI. I replied that I knew the “podcasts“ were from Google NotebookLM. By this afternoon both comments were gone. I wonder why he/she/they can’t just admit it. It seems the first several paragraphs are original, setting the stage, and then there’s the AI. I think it’s well done and interesting, but…
Yes, that was my pattern too. I figured that my replies at least went to one person before they were deleted. I was thinking of the syllogism: AI is a lie. Unbekoming is AI. Therefore Unbekoming is a lie.
Let's try an experiment, if you're game. Post duplicate replies to this reply, and I'm going to remove one as the post author, and we'll see if it leaves a record. I'm curious as to whether UB has special privileges with Substack. But if it forces me to give a reason, I won't bother because I don't want to unintentionally hurt your Substack standing. It know that even after UB removed my comments, I could still post new ones. What do you think?
Yes, ok here is a reply. Incidentally I made a new comment saying I saw that he deleted the earlier comments and telling him I don’t care if he uses AI, but why doesn’t he admit it. It’s gone already.
I appreciate your in depth exposés that shine a light onto various online personas and publications.
Its funny, something recently told me to unsubscribe from Unbekoming. It was just a gut feeling, that there was some fakery or dishonesty involved with the publication. Makes sense now that I read this.
That is when I started sensing something was off with the Unbekoming publication.
I just posted the following notes pertaining to "A.I." generated content.
1. Substack is filled with Chatbot slop specialists publishing material intended for coaching in the closet A.I. Dependant Writers to pretend their writing is 100% written by humans.
2. In this note I invited people that are writers on Substack that do not use generative A.I. for writing to drop a comment so others that value genuine undiluted human writing can support your work.
I also stated : I have no beef with those that use AI for writing and are upfront about it, but the sneaky ones that try to trick people are dishonest in my opinion and should be called out.
Thus, I also think starting a list of publications that definitely use AI to write (not spell check, I am talking generating whole paragraphs and articles and then they edit them a bit to look more human) and make no mention of generative AI assistance in writing so that people know what they are engaging with. Unfortunately I think that list would end up being massive for Substack and would grow exponentially, still I think it’s worth it.
(i`ll be making this Unbekoming first on that list, so thanks for helping start off the tally. Can you nominate any other unworthy and deceptive Generative AI dependent publications for the red list?)
Lastly, 3. I shared my experience with a publication that goes by "Agy - The Buffalo Herbalist" related to a comment about A.I. Generated content, where she deleted all my comments and then blocked me out of the blue.
I describe my interactions with her in the note linked below:
Gavin! I'm so happy to see you here. I was hoping word would get back to you. Did you see the comment where I linked all the articles in which I'd mentioned you? It turned out to be quite a list.
I'm in complete agreement with you that it's undisclosed AI that's fraudulent, but the rest may also be poison. Label them GMO ideas! Maybe AI is the self-replicating mRNA of the brain--it seeps in and starts breeding, er, cloning itself. Breeding is too organic.
I loved seeing that your mention got a response from Gabe, one of the most authentic writers and thinkers I know. And his reply was perfect: "I write for personal development so AI slop is counter-productive to that aim." That fits me too. I write in order to teach myself something new. AI would make me a consumer, not a creator. It's all about the process.
You already mentioned Mary Poindexter McLaughlin but the rest of our Apocaloptomist Club fits in the anti-AI group too: Kathleen Devanney, Margaret Anna Alice, Tonika of Visceral Adventures (visceral being the opposite of AI ;-)
Check out the Good Citizen article I linked for info on esc and on AI detection tools. I watched Doc Malik's interview of the back of esc's head but haven't read him. Frances Leader (another anti-AI) had some choice words on esc.
I wonder about our old friend Bob Malone. He sure was prolific, along with jetting between speaking engagements and interviews. There was something formulaic about his style, with folksy Grateful Dead quotes. His speaking voice let the real CIA Bob slip through.
I don't think that video summaries should count for your list but now that I tried out Riverside, I recognize those beautifully written bios and intros. It's very different than trying to distill the essence by hand. When I read Doc Malik's author bio of me, I was tempted to use it for my profile page. I still may. But I'm pretty certain it's Riverside's.
I wonder if any of us should be producing more content than is humanly possible. Attention is finite, and AI speedsters are taking up a lot of it. Isn't it a conceit to think that your content is so good, it should be all a person needs?
At the same time, I wouldn't mind an AI repository of book summaries, and UB does have a damn good formula. I would have loved to see my book summarized by his prompts. I suspect it would have made it more accessible and given it more exposure than anything else I've done. But I couldn't get over that nagging sense that something wasn't right. It certainly isn't the first--or last--time I've shot myself in the foot to remove the scruple (whose literal meaning is a pebble in the shoe).
So good to hear from you, Gavin, my authentic friend!
Why do so many popular dissidents 'speaking out' find the time to debate and argue with people online but say/do absolultely nothing about real gold standard level official evidence which proves every critic viewpoint from 2020 valid? I would also agree with no virus narrative because if any group should be promoting the following it should be them, as no virus right...so what killed people in 2020?
Lies blocked me for commenting that he needed to come clean about his use of AI.
It's disgusting. I cannot possibly trust anyone that uses crap generators in any way shape or form; it's been clear for a long time now that they're unreliable at best, and any AI usage at all indicates extremely poor judgement.
As is frequently said: "If you use AI to write it, I'll use AI to read it."
I was unaware of Sasha's behavior. Thanks for enlightening me.
Sorry, I have no idea who you are. Pamela Drew re-stacked you, and the title caught my eye. I subscribe to Unbecoming but often delete most of those substacks as there's a kind of weird inconsistency and also extreme views as well. I did wonder how this person is able to be so prolific, so thank you for exposing that. I don't follow Sasha but I see her tweets from time to time and she always seemed bad-tempered and rude therefore leaving a bad impression of herself. It was interesting to note that she's even worse. Anyway I apologise I hadn't come across your name before but I nonetheless appreciate you answering some of my unspoken questions. Keep on keeping on, Tereza.
Don't apologize, I have no idea who you are either! There are a lot of us people in the world. Who can keep tabs on all of us? ;-)
Thank you for reading and leaving that kind response. It is a murky pond. I'm figuring it out by feel. I start with a blank page divided into 8 boxes, as a 'beat sheet' for points I want to hit. Then I record the video to develop those points. Then I try to write it more clearly and more organized than I said it. But it's still only half finished until the conversation in the comments. That's where the ideas get developed. So I'm very happy that this resonated with that feeling of unease with both UB and SL.
Thanks for such detailed analysis, T. I'm so glad there are people with tenacious, intelligent patience enough to run down the endless rabbit holes of our chaotic existence. You clearly are a handful of things, but boring ain't one of 'em. Glad to have found you 🌹
Haha, 'not boring' is high praise coming from you, Johnny. And thanks for the shout-out on your post, I'll comment there too.
But let's not quibble about petty things like undisclosed AI and censorship. Let's go to the true mortal sin of Unbekoming: did you catch his abuse of the ellipses in his 2022 writing? "I love Brett and so happy that he has come out on the right side of the argument on vax risk, but…he, like many others, is wrong on a very important point."
I rest my case ...
Omg, you are the only person in the entire world who truly understands me 😝
Wow…you exposed many of the fraudulent “medical freedom” peeps.👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
As far as Miz Latypova, I had the pleasure of meeting her in person at the Weston A Price Wise Traditions conference in Salt Lake City in October. I went up to her and introduced myself. She was rather prickly and not friendly at all, and I could tell, she really didn’t want to interact with me. (I was mostly talking to her about a painting of her’s that I bought and had framed and was complimenting as to how much I liked the painting.) This was from someone who was a featured speaker at an event of over 1500 plus people.
Then a day later I walked up on an ‘interaction’ that she was having with Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey about what they had allegedly said about her in one of their talks. (The Bailey’s were featured speakers at this event as well.) Miz Latypova perceived that what The Bailey’s had said, was a slam against her.
The interaction was not friendly or cordial whatsoever. Finally Mark Bailey took Sam’s arm and they walked away.
.
Wow, you bought one of her pricy paintings and she still didn't want to interact with you! You definitely deserve to put 'pleasure of meeting' in quotes. I don't know if the password reset is related, but it sure is creepy.
Yes the painting was a 9” x 12” oil for $250 (not framed). She made no connection to my name, as a buyer of her artwork. Is she so successful selling them she has no recollection who buys her work? Does she not keep track of a piece and who buys it?
I used to buy a lot of original artwork for my clients when I was an interior designer. Galleries and Artist Reps always kept track of who purchased the artwork!
She definitely has a prickly way about her. She’s not the cozy or friendly type at all.
It is very creepy about the password deal.
I had no reason to reset my Weston A Price password today! 🕵🏼♀️
As an artist you have to keep a record of who buys your work in case you need to borrow it for a retrospective or some pompous thing. at least they tell you that in art school. and general it is good business habit. so you can tell those who like your work when you are having a show. there s always a sign up list.
Having been in the design/interior design business for over 40 years, and the peripheral gallery/museum art scene I am aware of this system.
I realize this art thing for Ms. Latypova is just a ‘side hustle’ and she doesn’t make her living as an artist. I like her work her oil paintings and watercolors. I just think it’s strange that she doesn’t really keep track of who is buying her art. I also sent her a photo of the framed piece, to her website and she never responded back. It’s like she takes the money and then hasta luego! She does promote her art work on her Substack, after all!
It would be Nice, to have a team. because painting takes Time. writing also takes time. (not to mention keeping you own affairs in order day to day) maybe there are 2 of her. and two assistants. sometimes she seems disciplined and controlled, others emotionally unhinged. Often public personas would seem to take identical twins to accomplish all that they do, at minimum. this is not even taking in to account any social life at all. pets. emergencies. (recent storms come to mind) .
Well, not loving intruding on your nice convo here, I am going to for two reasons. First, I agree Arte, she sure gets a lot done for one person. Second, Frontera, I used to be really impressed with Sasha's artwork when she first began posting them; the subjects were very unlike my perception of artist/scientist who created them. Here's a weird admission: I was jealous of her brains/talent/inexhaustible energy and began to feel inadequate. Then I felt, because I was done squeezing all the bullshit out of The Great Lie, I just stopped looking at her stuff.
Anyhow, I also began to think her stuff is AI created and then - well, like if you wanted to order a "masterpiece oil" of a replica Rembrandt - had it painted. I'm probably wrong, but maybe not.
I've gone by a couple variations of "Amy" since nov 2020, I've read your comments for a long time. But you have been much more active. -A
This is very interesting. I was there too in SLC for WAPF conference. I had a very interesting experience with Sash here on SS. I thought about talking to her about it in SLC. I passed her in the vendor hall post her talk- which I did not attend. When I passed her I looked at her and thought I should bring up our interaction online and ask if she would like to actually say it to my face? Then I thought maybe this cold human just needs a hug? Maybe I should ask if she needs a hug? By the way she attacks people online I thought she might punch me in my face at WAPF whether I brought up our interaction here on SS or took a pic with her and hugged her.
I don’t trust the woman. Many love her. But actions speak louder than words for me. I like the Baileys. They were very well spoken. It was overall a wonderful conference! I look forward to next year!
Well from witnessing the little ‘exchange’ that she had with The Baileys, the last morning of the conference, I would venture to say that if you had gone up to her, introduced yourself as the person she had a ‘thing’ with on Substack, it might not have gone well, for you. Or she could have just dismissed you and not even engaged. That is her ‘energy’. She is not cozy, she is not warm. I just want to say that there were a couple of other “well known” terrain theory guys who are doctors, who spoke at the conference, who are not warm or extending of themselves, either. The Baileys were very gracious and kind. So were Josh and Adam Bigelsen, of the Bigelsen Academy. They were great guys, willing to engage and chat. I really enjoyed the conference, and all the people I met there, but don’t know if I want to go across the country next Fall to Washington DC. I’m not really enjoying the process of going to airports, the security check in deal, and flying for hours on a plane these days. If I do, would be to go to a tropical locale and sit on a beach and swim in warm water.
😉🌴🌊
So, just out of curiosity, would you be willing to name the other terrain theory guys who were not so warm and fuzzy?
Hee! Hee! Do I dare? Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan. The irony is that Dr. Cowan, when he lived in California, in the Bay Area, my good friends who live in Sebastopol took their then young daughter (now in her 30’s) to Dr. Cowan. She had some issues with her hearing, which led to learning disabilities. My friends are organic, holistic, hippie types, who didn’t vaccinate their three children and they all went to Waldorf schools.
That’s why they went to Dr. Cowan because he was into holistic medicine. I introduced myself to him, and mentioned that we have a bit of a “three degrees of separation” connection, through my friends and their daughter who was his patient years ago. He mumbled a few words like “that’s interesting” and stopped talking. I could tell it was my cue to leave.
It’s not so much what they say, it’s the vibe that they project, their persona that I noticed. And neither one were that great at giving these ‘talks’. Their talks, though filled with some good info, were quite lackluster to me. I prefer to listen to engaging speakers, who also have good stuff to say. Just because one is knowledgeable in a subject doesn’t necessarily translate into being a good public speaker about it.
I had a much different experience with Cowan. When I met him I found both he and his wife to be very personable. Not only that, he was incredibly generous with his time. It was a different environment though - not at a large conference, which certainly could make a difference.
Sarah! I was just about to comment on your excellent meme collection. For those few who aren't already subbed to you: https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/memeslong-overdue-happy-new-year. Thanks for adding your pov.
And I LOVED my first pilates session! Who knew that breathing could be an abdominal exercise? She also diagnosed something I've been living with for months as the sciatica nerve in my deltoid, which now makes total sense. And showed that my inability to do inverts in aerial isn't lack of core strength but tight hamstrings. I'm now flossing my teeth laying on the ground with my legs at a right angle on the wall ;-) I will definitely keep going back.
Well it could be that you are after all ‘a known Substacker’!
😉📝
People know who you are, what you do and what you write about! And it’s likely the Cowans knew of you and your Substack.
I am just a person attending a WAP conference , who had friends in CA that took their young daughter to see him in SF years ago, when he had a ‘medical practice’ there. 🤔
Oh and a PS: I loved the electric car/AC/DC meme today! I shared it around a bit.
Kaufman has been representing a paradigm against the possibility of viral caused chronic illness since the 1990's. (Maybe even 1980's). He is discussed in Hilary Johnson's famous book "Oslers Web". Harvard has been gatekeeping this issue since deep into the previous century, promoting and popularizing the idea that patients are crazy or to blame for their condition while simultaneously benefitting from the biomedical data extracted from the patients. There is a separation of roles between Harvard and Stanford. Stanford collecting cytokine profiles from patients (alternatively diagnosed as effected by: HHV-6, EBV, XMRV, ME/CFS) then Boston Biotechnology utilizes and exports this data on the markets as diagnostic assays. Harvard is a sort of gatekeeper in that people like Kaufman promoted the idea of psychological etiology in the face of evidence of viral infection. In order for people to appreciate my position: I'm not dogmatic about viruses or antiviral treatments. The true scientific alternative to to a dogmatic adherence to viruses is called "nutritional balancing" and hopefully there were HTMA (Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis) representatives at the WAP conference. Either the path of addressing viral infection or ignoring the concept of virus and utilizing HTMA can be beneficial pathways to address chronic illness from COVID. ignoring each of these and promoting some amorphous "terrain theory" concept is dishonest and most likely part of a planned distraction campaign. HTMA is a science with loads of data and testimony behind it for decades as well as popular campaigns against it in published medical journal articles. If "terrain theory" had any validity then it's practitioners will be honest and admit the HTMA foundation upon which they must stand for efficacy. Prescribing minerals (trace minerals, shilajit etc.) in the absence of a hair lab analysis is just irresponsible blind experimentation.
There were not any HTMA people at the WAP conference. It is something that I have heard about as an accurate assessment tool to help determine what is going on in the body of any given person.
Thank you for your insightful comment.
Oh and where might one find a practitioner or lab that does HTMA analysis? I am in SoCA.
https://substack.com/@thepascorrupt/note/c-199083413?r=1urjwn&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web
Kaufman is easy to pick out as a disinformation agent, from my experience. His ‘meteoric rise’ through the ranks of the medical ‘truth scene’ is extremely suspect. I watched every bit of it. He just happens to begin speaking out during the pandemic, not before? Silly. People should have a higher bar for their discernment. Kaufman appeared on the fucking Alex Jones show for a time. Come on people, that's a massive red flag.
Plenty of red flags with Cowan too. Just one being, his characterizing David Icke as an old friend. Icke is one of the ultimate gate keepers in all this. Icke was a professional goal keeper by the way. Not a coincidence. Look at how many phony personalities from the medical truth scene connect to David Icke!
I only recently got into Kaufman. I watched some of his stuff, but stopped. Then I listened to a talk he gave at the Wise Traditions Conference in SLC, and I really was not impressed. I could have delivered a better presentation with his material than he did. The thing I have with a number these “medical freedom” peeps now, they ALL are about the monetizing of their “brand”, which is them. They want to sell you this, that, and the other supplement or treatment plan.
I know they have to make money now somehow, since they left their professions, and have re-invented themselves.
A number of them have linked themselves up with The Wellness Company, as their sponsor of their podcasts. TWC was started and is owned by Foster Coulson. Well we all know about him and his background. His family was in the engineered wood business, and branched off from there. He is a “serial entrepreneur/experienced innovator” investing in markets and areas of interest that he knows will make him money. So why not a “wellness company” in the throws of a Scamdemic? Then he lured in Dr. Peter McCullough, and other ‘medical freedom’ doctor luminaries and such, and went on to sponsor other “medical freedom influencers” like Naomi Wolf and others who now schlock TWS products on their podcasts for $$$.
Oh and about David Icke…years ago a friend who was all into Icke recommended that I take a listen to him. Something about the guy, never cared for him or what he had to say. Quite frankly I am more interested these days in the lesser known, less heard voices here on Substack, like Tereza C. They still seem to have a foot in reality and are seeking the truth about the subjects they focus on.
That is very flattering, but I don’t think that’s the case lol. I’m glad you enjoyed the memes…I have a good time collecting them - and I feel like every chuckle is a personal 🖕🫵 to the murderers of the world.
Thank you for the dedication and effort to document the frauds.As an old warhorse in battling the Biotech Mafia most of these meddlers get little of my attention or engagement beyond passing comments in Substack threads. What disturbed me most was the fact that what was a Substack feature of noting that comments were deleted by the author the comments here disappeared without a trace. What that does is turn an interactive discussion platform into a tool of pure propaganda.
In my first engagement with Sasha in Doc Malik's post of an interview about opoid deaths by Mark Kulacz comments were restricted to paid subs only so I sprung for the $5 to subscribe and add my feedback. Sasha then blocked me Doc Malik refunded my fee and bloocked me but my comments were noted as deleted. Very little stands out as fraud more quickly than censorship and the fact that these folks are beyond criticism evokes the old adage that if you want to know who rules you just look to who you cannot criticize.
This crowd are the new variant of Rockefeller - Gates Biotech Mafia who will not let the discussion of novel proteins in GMO ingredients be they genetically modified plants or mRNA Transfections come into question because humans NEVER tolerate tier patent protected mutants and the fortunes built on the idea of playing God with genes is deadly. They are all on the same team hiding the basic truths in a scheme of dying for profits.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/monsanto-sues-pfizer-moderna-and
Thanks for first letting me know about this, Pamela, and connecting me to others who were watching. I'll repeat here that when I mentioned your name, Tonika said you were 'the real deal' and Margaret Anna Alice said you were the Nancy Drew of conspiracies ;-)
I picked up on that too, that no italicized 'comment deleted' showed up. I know that Sasha's deleted comments on my stack still show her thumbprint. The author has an option to remove, but I thought that still left a record. There's 'ban user' but I was still able to post comments, that were subsequently removed.
I wonder if UB is inside Substack. Maybe IS Substack. I'll have to try the remove button sometime and see.
I've talked privately to Ahmad about Sasha, so he's heard my arguments but just thinks she has a temper. I decided not to listen to that interview because I knew I wouldn't be able to keep from commenting. I did post a link to my episode, with something like 'for a different view on Sasha.' I didn't go back and see if it was taken down. It really bothers me that he'd take down yours.
Everything that was not flattering was deleted without a trace and kudos for flagging that goes to a hawk eyed friend it was not my find. Jay Couey also had a link to a stream about Sasha & daughter Soph that was deleted along with Stella Marris 100% image thing that was under Jay's link.. on the bright side people let you know they are dirtbags by these actions so it save time puzzling about finding truth in their content.. little more revolting than working for murderous powers.
''They are all on the same team hiding the basic truths in a scheme of dying for profits. ''
I liked that comment Pamela. Alt/awake is a lucrative business space with millions of potential customers. I too have discovered many 'freedom' proponents have no issue deleting and blocking legitimate accounts/comments.
I am 100% with you, Tereza re both of them. Although I have to admit I still keep an eye on SL’s work. Even though she is such a crass individual, and she never misses an opportunity to insult me and many others. At some point I thought she cannot go lower but she proves me wrong regularly.
She is a liability to any credible or intelligent people.
I moved on from Lies long ago. They are lies as you say. I hope you don’t pay them, if yes, you might consider a charge back. His letter to his kids is a weak and rather stupid copy of an outstanding letter of another non anonymous man. It was circulating in awake communities. It was brilliant. I should have saved it. Same title very different and intelligent content. When I saw Lies letter when it came out, I smelled a rat. And then even though I was not up to date with AI and its usage info, I sensed deception in their work, so I moved on.
Our most precious asset, after our data, is our attention. I don’t give (try not to) mine to thieves.
I am glad that others corroborated my intuition!
Re AMD, they also stink - mixes a lot of lies and misinformation with truths and the ppl blindly trust them.
I think it is a data collection effort.
Their constant self congratulations and ego polishing in their lengthy - AI from the start - articles was off putting, and didn’t feel genuine. Especially because given their early subjects, I realised they follow (I think they recently discovered) the trailblazers I’ve also been following (for a decade) yet they NEVER named them rather presented everything as their own knowledge, using their (the trailblazers’) refs and sources! Red flag. The individual behind is an ego maniac cheater.
I also never trusted SS (<- are we aware of how we abbreviate SUB-stack, and how we use the term SUBs - are we all subs? To whom exactly?) so I don’t pay anyone here because I don’t want to give my data to anyone, not even to you Tereza. All I use (email, or names etc) are aliases. I don’t create content, and I don’t care if I am taken for an anonymous troll.
So interesting, yulia, on the data collection. You prompted me to think that AI is systematic word theft. With Eisenstein and the toxic boys who stole my phrase, there's a record of where they got it. But with AI, the author is erased. The 150 likes were enough to show it was a marketable commodity. And the idea it captured is left behind--as Eisenstein and the boyz also did.
SS has a checkbox in the settings where you can opt out of having your content used as an AI learning model, but they tell you it might be used anyway. I think we are, perhaps, THE primary AI learning database. Where else would you have so many writers feeding their words into the machine?
It's funny that at 3 am, UB refunded the $22 left on my $33 subscription. I'd noticed that he was subbed to me, so that didn't take long. I don't monetize anything, so you couldn't pay me anyway. I don't want a two-tier system or to think about whether I'd lose subs for anything I said. Curious that UB's subs have gone up in 4 months to $50.
I'm very glad you're keeping an eye on SL's work! Once you know that someone's in on the scam, it's especially important to see what their agenda really is. Why are they giving you the 90% of deep dive truth and where do they slip in the 10% they want you to swallow?
Someone named Geraldine May sent me an angry email saying I was doing a great disservice to the TRUTH to question either UB or SL. First, I told her it was cowardly to critique someone privately rather than in the public venue where it was posted. Then I wrote: "If you look at the eight points I list, are you saying that none of them are important? Certainly you agree that Unbekoming couldn’t do all this without AI, yes? Is it honest that he’s never admitted that? Or that he censors comments but also censors any comments that say he censors? If censoring is nothing to be ashamed of, why doesn’t he want anyone to know he’s doing it?
"It’s a very curious thing, Geraldine. Apparently, you aren’t at all critical of Sasha calling myself and others turds, twats, cretins, faggots, pussies, mentally retarded, toxic and stupid trash, and an ' insufferable postmenopausal, lonely, dissatisfied cunt’. Do you use that language?
"Yet you’re upbraiding me because I dare to question Sasha—not call her names, not tell her she’s lucky I don’t kill her, but merely quote her.
"You’ve been doing the same research for 10 yrs and so have all the other speakers you mention. Do you not care what kind of morality a person has as long as they publicize your points? That seems like a short term strategy to me. What happens when your vaccine research become publicly associated with someone who applauds their daughter’s death threats, recruitment of school shooters and posts saying ‘Kill all Muslims, it’s a public service’? You will be discredited and dismissed, along with your spokesperson.
"I don’t think you need to compromise. There are plenty of smart people with integrity who are making your points."
So YES, Sasha is a liability to the points she's making, not an asset. In the UB 'interview', something has the acronym ATUM and she mentions that's an Egyptian god. Now, I know that because I'm researching 4th millennium Egypt for my book, and how the goddess symbology was taken over by the motherfucking hieros/ Aryans. Atum was a big part of that. But it was very curious that Sasha would know this tidbit, which is part of the Illuminati/ Free Mason origin story. Interesting, eh?
I will add another observation abt SL. I may have mentioned this before.
I see a strange discrepancy between her written language skills as seen in her posts and sometimes replies to comments (which is clear, articulate and succinct) and her oral language skills (or lack thereof) which is disorganised and poor.
When she presents with support material (slide or notes) she’s good and articulate but in interviews (whether host or interviewee) where spontaneous reasoning is needed, she is more often than not embarrassingly disarticulate. I don’t mean her accent, I mean her content.
I am a nonnative speaker in an international environment where we are all multilingual but I rarely see this big of a discrepancy.
After all, she talks about the subjects she researches and writes about so one would expect her being able to tell about that same work verbally yet I find her searching for arguments, laughing strangely, having disorganised sentences, not finishing one and going to many directions… etc.
And her followers love it? It’s sooo very bizarre to me.
That's a cogent point, yulia. I haven't listened to interviews of her. I didn't think I could do that on Doc Malik's without needing to comment--and since he gifted me the paid sub and knows my research on Sasha, I thought I would refrain.
But it sounds like Ahmad censored paid sub Pamela Drew when she did comment. In writing this episode, I jotted down a title on UB & Sasha as bot meets bot. And then thought, 'Naaah ...' But that would explain a LOT.
I didn’t listen to that one either as I actively dislike both of them, as you know :))
Btw, has your follow up interview with him been published yet?
Comment censoring is a red flag.
I dislike and don’t trust Malik. I have a long list of issues with him. I don’t actively think he works for the other side, but he’s sooo dumb (so can be a tool for them) and is another ego maniac. Just listen to his early interviews and you will see it. He’s like a female SL in his interviews and he makes everything about himself.
He’s also too busy to wanting to make money and please the crowds for my taste.
He did the second interview behind a paywall. I did my own response to it here: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/does-sex-or-love-make-a-man-a-father?
Yes, I get tired of the self-congratulatory tone and the blame of others for not doing what he did. I'm not sure how many podcasters the dissident community can support, so I think he should be glad they didn't.
We're supposed to do a third interview in March, which won't be behind a paywall. He does take my ideas seriously, and that's been rare in my life. Although I don't think I've ever changed his mind.
I also keep finding him quoting my research and even definitions, like of anarchy, without mentioning me. He did a recent interview of James Corbett, which was very stiff, like neither one really wanted to do it but thought they should. They're talking about gov't and solutions, and Ahmad says, 'There's a book that you have to read.' I don't bother to get excited. He tells him about Meredith Miller's account of generational trauma and how that's trained us all to be obedient to gov't.
Now, I don't know that James had a traumatic childhood--Reportage says he didn't, which Ahmad was interviewing him about. Most people obey gov't because the bankers own all the houses and we can't live in one without making money. If Ahmad could explain how a non-traumatized person could get away with that, I'd love to hear it.
On the other hand, I've developed the perfect anarchist economic system, as I repeatedly tell both of them. Why isn't Ahmad bringing up my book? It was the perfect opportunity.
But for someone who calls himself an anarchist, Ahmad still thinks the State needs to intervene to take children away from mothers. That was the basis of our argument. If you trust the State more than mothers to care about the wellbeing of their children, I don't know what kind of anarchist you are.
It would be interesting to ask Malik directly why he doesn’t mention you when he cites your work (he’s the type to copy left right centre), and why he didn’t recommend or just mention your book if he thinks so highly about your work? Rather recommends a non relevant one.
In any case I trust that sooner or later you will see what I see re Malik.
Your perspective on obedience linked to mortgage is very west/Anglo-Saxon centric. But the anglo Saxon world is the minority!
It’s different in the East - where I currently reside.
One country I know and know for sure that generational trauma has been shaping obedience with regards to government is Russia. But it’s never black and white. People learn to go around the system but the trauma runs deep and does have a paralysing effect.
I can’t much elaborate as I am travelling and hate typing on a small device!
Note to self: I seem to comment when I travel….
To my mind, AI is worse than word theft. It’s identity theft.
All the opt outs are deceptive. I never believe them but I still opt out :))
In the UK ppl could opt up of their health data being shared with third parties yet they were shared…
Interesting re Lies’ refund. I am sure they read our thread and wanted to avoid the chargeback fees.
Yes re SL. And she’s a grifter too. She’s been steeling left and right and centre, even from me (lots of ideas) - haha. Not that I care, in fact it’s good as it lives on. She latched on different people and declared them her collaborators/colleagues.
She has zero integrity.
Jessica Hockett who was a late comer to SL’s work & vitriol (and who has now left SS for what it has become) has noticed all that was wrong with SL very quickly and put is succinctly, which I cannot reproduce here.
What’s also interesting in SL’s defence of her daughter’s “joke” is that Russian speakers know that “in every joke there’s a little bit of joke as well”. Meaning that a “joke” is a way to tell the truth in a palatable way.
Love your reply to Cowardine Geraldine who’s trying to chastise you in private.
Very interesting last point about her knowing of Atum.
I noticed that in conferences or in interviews when caring people genuinely worry for her safety or when ppl asks her if she’s ever worried about her safety, her reply is somewhat off. Of course, she’s never worried for her safety and her way of replying tells it all. She’s nonchalant, sardonic and mocking at the same time (hard to find the right words :) but my senses tell that’s not the way a normal person who stand alone would reply. It’s the response of a complicit. And, she never shows human like reactions to the person who cares and worries for her safety.
Curious that UB's intro subscription fee was $33, eh? Occult signaling?
Did you or someone else tell me that UB's letter to his sons was usurped from one that was much more coherent and better written? His version is jumpy and authority-based, not facts and logic. That changed my sense of him to realize even his early work was stealing the format and ideas of others.
That's an excellent point that this is stealing more than just words, but actually identity-theft of the author. That's so true! I had it backwards. By taking the term I'd coined, the Toxic Boyz became me, the author who came up with it. They put my identity on as a disguise over their meaning, which was a bro-fest. Instead of tonic masculinity as a healing relationship between men and women, it became toxic superiority--a men's club to which I wasn't even invited, except as someone celebrating their genius as a group defined by MY term. None of them even acknowledged me in their writing or speaking as 'the Tonic 10'.
So Eisenstein isn't just stealing words. He's become the great, deep thinker who came up with these ways to describe our common experience. He's become a prophet, a guru, a seer, a mystic. But there's no vision behind the pithy sayings because they didn't emanate from him. And the vision they did capture is erased, because the words are now a facade on an empty, shabby building.
Yes, I did mention that his letter was a poor attempt to copy another man’s wonderful letter. Here and elsewhere too. Maybe others did too.
The person behind UB seems to be rather mediocre (if not a bit dumb - hence the extensive AI usage); and before turning to AI (and following up on the commentators’ ideas and suggestions) they had not much idea on their own let alone skill to present them coherently.
Now that everybody uses AI (and many different AIs), only those who have true human intelligence and discernment will stand out. The rest will be/are the zombies and bots, like UB, the feeders and mindless readers.
I think that in the future (which is already here), the most valuable asset or ensemble of assets will be discernment, intuition and spiritual abilities, all which provide real knowing. Certainty not data or knowledge.
Re Eisenstein, I have nothing to add. If not that I never came across him before a few years ago when Alison brought it to my attention. (I’ve never had any interest in anything American let alone western wannabe gurus!) But thanks to Alison I had a look at him. And I got BAD vibes from him so never looked further. To me, he feels dirty, dirty inside. His eyes and gaze tells me he’s dirty and is working for the devil and not to be trusted. In fact, I cannot even fully hear what he says because of the vibe and all the warnings I am getting from him. Genuine teachers or spiritual persons (I know quite a few) send very different vibes.
Reading your experience with his character confirms my intuition.
To your final point - hmm… SL’s crassness is so off-putting, I’d rather get my info from someone else making similar points but behaving with grace and decorum on this public platform. Such weird contrast to her fabulous artwork. (At least, she’s been saying it’s her work…? Has she posted a video of her actually producing a painting? Because, even that could come under doubt now.)
Funny, that occurred to me too. I know I've seen a painting of soph from when she was young. I'd guess that they are, since there's no doubt she's brilliant. I think there's some kind of mind control cult in her upbringing, would be my guess.
And yes, I'm glad that yulia is keeping an eye on her so I don't have to ;-)
There’s something sinister in that verbal nastiness that contrasts so starkly with her scientific and artistic work. The way she attacks those who disagree in the slightest is like an rabid dog. Very unpleasant. (Fits right in with the current US government, come to think of it.)
You might appreciate this discussion - re the importance of attention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvbivgLI6lc
SO interesting, Kathleen. I wrote the first chapter of my book on my theology of OneMind Dreaming. I call the chapter Time Out of Mind. Paul comes to the same conclusion, that the world we perceive is a dream. Towards the end, he says that the separate self perceiving doesn't exist, and is part of the dream. I love his Jung quote about the one sugar crystal that teaches the whole solution to be a crystal again.
I think Paul, Pam and others like The Secret lose consistency is in the logic. If this is all a dream, why do you need to control it? It's certainly good to have those synchronicities and miracles that remind you it's a dream, so you're not worrying. But it takes the opposite lesson if you then think you have to do the right things, 'get your mind right' in order to make things happen. Then you're not a victim, but you have to take responsibility that everything that happens you've done to yourself. It's a double-whammy.
The quantum physics explanation still comes back to physics as in physical reality. Your expectations make light a wave or a particle but once you've done that, it exists, it's reality. That's contrary to it being a dream with no real existence.
I've become particularly attuned to the hieros/ Aryan spells in language. Paul uses a few when he talks about superheroes [hieros] and 'mastering'. In effect, his theology makes each of us our own god, creating the world we see. What the Course says is that the use of mind is uncreative, unless we're thinking with God/dess. Nothing happens.
He also imagines evil trying to thwart him. Where does that come from if he hasn't created it? Overall, it seems very lonely to be taking responsibility for everything. It's been a relief feeling that 'I need do nothing.' And I do a LOT of nothing ;-)
Been meaning to get back to you....
Paul's first books were on Weitko -egregore-like life form that infiltrates humanity, particularly through the mind. A mind virus. He's not alone of course on that view.
His more recent work I think has evolved a bit and his focus is overall more on discovering agency in that kind of environment.
"The quantum physics explanation still comes back to physics as in physical reality. Your expectations make light a wave or a particle but once you've done that, it exists, it's reality. That's contrary to it being a dream with no real existence."
That's the thing that's really bubbling up now. Our intentions in the field definitely steer things - not perfectly of course - but even once those intentions result in manifestation at the physical level, we can have reality shifts (mandela effects) and they can change again. So the whole model is changing. I suspect it's tied to frequencies.
It suggests - it does to me - that the nature of physical reality is proving to be a lot less persistent than we previously thought.
The individuated self - experiencing separation - is in constant contradiction. It's nearly impossible to express via words how these two aspects interplay without creating logical roadblocks and/or dead-ends.
"What the Course says is that the use of mind is uncreative, unless we're thinking with God/dess. Nothing happens."
I agree with this - thinking with Source is alignment. In some ways the mess our planet is in is the result of what humans out of alignment do on their own. So something happens - you make a mess - but it can't sustain because it's hollowed out, the essence isn't included. And really when you include that essential of God/dess, that alignment comes naturally with a feeling of responsibility. They go hand in hand. At least that's how it seems. When we step out of alignment, we feel it and self-correct.
In some of his interviews he has said more clearly that this mind-virus is actually serving humanity. The catalyst that breaks us out of the illusion of our separateness.
Not sure I'm making much sense.
One thing I do know for sure - whatever it is you do or don't do - it's perfect.
Your comment section blew up! Sussing who to trust in this AI world is obviously on many people's minds. Best.
Thank you, Kathleen, I'm putting it at the top of my queue--and maybe I'll delete my other open tabs after I listen to it. But not Tonika's! I've been watching the Silent Theatre production of Lulu that launched her as a director. It's phenomenal, and it started as a college project: https://silenttheatre.substack.com/p/lulu-a-black-and-white-silent-play.
Thanks for alerting me to it, T. I will definitely watch.
Thank you! I will have a listen.
"Our most precious asset, after our data, is our attention." 👏
have been suspicious of “Lies” for quite a while now but follow to see what they (AI) are pushing.
all of them put DMSO on a pedestal (Lies,AMD, Kirsch)as a cure-all makes me thankful that I didn’t try it and wary that it makes your entire body a sponge for the aerosolized trans-human tech (EMF activated.)
is the nano aluminum really meant to cause widespread dementia & is the nano barium really meant to degrade our skeletal system?
spineless techno zombies?
maybe back in the day DMSO was effective with minimal risk … but now?
so anyone that promotes DMSO now without serious, explicit warning would also be on my radar.
have had a lot of unexplained technical difficulties after posting something on the “conspiracy” spectrum… including segments of comments “disappearing.”
at some point it will be impossible to communicate using demon-possessed AI.
way back when someone suggested that SL used daughter to respond to all comments.
You're so good at following these clues, kitten. No wonder you're on their radar. I always read what you post, even if I don't comment.
I don't know if soph would post that she's a 'gift from God' and how proud she is of her. That sounds like a mom who's trying to convince herself. I wonder if they got driven out of Marin. I remember that the students staged a walk-out in protest of how offensive soph's videos were. She did some vicious ones also cyber-bullying girls she perceived as mean, and the moms got together and alerted the school. Soph responded with a video acting like the moms were pedos to be lurking on her channel.
When she did her video on the gun range recruiting school shooters, that wasn't to be taken lightly.
Wow. How sick. And it’s a child…
😿
I like and have been using DMSO for a long time, since well before convid, but one has to know it and use it with caution.
DMSO used to be a solvent fo cleaning machine guns.
People started using it for skin conditions around 1990..
WTF ????
there are some convincing testimonials but add in glyphosate that makes the gut leaky and brain permeable …
No Thank you to all of it that can be avoided
I have to give it to you, for sussing this out. but some of us, (gavin mounsey) compiling a list of AI-writers. like the red blood journal, and unbecomming, and others. there is an impersonal taste they leave which is alienating. beyond the in-authenticity of non-disclosure. like i told the journal, AT least go through the article. If you are not dyslexic like me, you can see the errors. I need an editor. but i refuse to work with an ai from sheer hardheaded stubbornness. It's a character flaw i have.
Oh! I haven't connected with Gavin for awhile but I love his work. When I did a search to show you one I did on him, I found that I'd mentioned him in many: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/recipes-for-reciprocity-by-gavin, https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/elizabeth-nicksons-hate-speech, https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/i-mage-a-nation, https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/animal-husbandry-is-the-new-vegetarian and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/changing-our-story.
I also realized that he and I first 'met' on Eisenstein's stack and he was the one who alerted me that the Toxic 10 had stolen my phrase and run with it: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/tonic-masculinity-and-the-mad-hatter.
If you have a link to Gavin's current list of AI writers, I'd love a link. I'm with you on that character flaw. Maybe it will change what we appreciate, the way that photography changed art from being merely representational. Writing that doesn't produce meaning, but is merely well crafted words, may no longer hold any sway. We can hope.
“Eisenstein as an intelligence asset wolf in sheep clothing”…I feel the same about Dr. Bob Malone…”wolf in sheep’s clothing” and the supreme grifter, who has “pulled the wool” over many people, one of them being A Midwestern Doctor who has large paid following here on Substack. I got into a little tete a tete with AMD about Malone last year. He considers Dr. Bob a “friend”. 🤔🙄
Yes, definitely true on Malone, as I have 27 episodes to attest. This one is good for looking at the overall tells that someone is a sheepdog sent to round up the strays and send them back to the slaughterhouse by a route called freedom: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malone-and-slaughterhouse-four.
This one links the first 16 articles on him: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/truth-is-like-a-chamelion. And these are the most recent: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malone-and-the-cull-de-sac and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/dodgy-doge-and-malones-maham.
I also did one on my conversation with AMD regarding Malone: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-psyops-cyclops. It VERY strangely got taken down by YT 21 mos after being posted, giving me another strike just when the first was about to expire. It cited dangerous misinformation at minute 24:32. That was a comment thread with the anonymous blogger, A Midwestern Doctor, where I had stated that Robert Malone's $21M BARDA contract to test repurposed drugs could have prevented Emergency Use Authorization by testing HCQ & IVM, stopping the vaccines before they started.
And my Mealy-Mouthed Malone video got taken down right before Malone's PsyWar lecture was posted and went to 1M views. So if he was the trigger, why didn't they sanction that? There's no doubt that Malone and AMD are in on the game.
Yes Dr. Bob and AMD are ‘buds’. And AMD was a bit tiffed that I called Dr. Bob a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”. “That’s not his experience” with Dr. Bob. Of course not, when “they are in on the same game”.
She. A Midwestern Doc is a woman. I thought she was one of the best I’d discovered.
You really think the AMD is a woman? If so thats why Dr. Bob has done a total snow job on her!
I had a conversation with her on one of her posts. I thought she was a man and she told me otherwise -this was two or three years ago. But who knows? Nothing is as it seems, especially these days.
A wise comment, 'Nothing is as it seems, especially these days.' Agreed! I hold the leash on my dogmas lightly and let them run away when need be.
So true! Nothing is at it seems. And then there’s so much spin on every f**king event that happens on a daily basis it’s no wonder that the left and right are at each others throats based upon the spin they watch or read.
It’s a Uniparty. It’s all theatre.
Thanks, T. I had stopped reading UB a while back. My gut said it was largely AI, so good to read this. Not just because it confirms that, but because these are the murky waters we find ourselves in.
Separately, but related - I read recently in an RJ Spina book, that what he calls the EMI (Ego, Mind Identity) is basically AI. It was a new way, for me, to think of it. From that lens, conditioned minds and the identities attached to them, basically amount to AI. People regurgitate what they've been fed just like AI can only use what its been programed with. (Of course with humans, that can be rectified)
In a sense we've been living with A.I. long before it showed up in its current form.
I wonder, should enough people manage to see through and break free, what that will mean going forward for the 'external' manifestations of AI? Maybe it what's needed to put it in its proper place - which as you point out - has definite benefits.
Thanks, Tereza, and best to you.
Leave it to you, Kathleen, to go to the metaphysical--where you know I'll be thrilled to meet you! OMGdess, YES! Of course we're dealing with the OG AI with the ego-mind! What a brilliant connection for Spina to make.
Because I got so annoyed with translating God into Goddess in the Course, I've been back to the one-line meditations, which I'd once memorized and where that substitution makes ALL the difference. So the first ten are:
"What I see has no meaning. I have given what I see all the meaning it has for me. I do not understand anything I see. My thoughts have no meaning. I am never upset for the reasons I think. I am upset because I see what is not there. I see only the past. A meaningless world engenders fear. Goddess did not create a meaningless world. My thoughts are images that I have made."
It makes perfect sense that by making the artificial construct more systematized, it would make it easier to see and reject. Like everything else, the more they do to fuck us over, the more it backfires.
Thank you for that!
I have to add this comment. I just got an email two hours after I posted my comment earlier this afternoon, from the Weston A Price Foundation, notifying me about “my attempt to reset my password on the member dashboard” of their website. I never tried to reset my password on their website this afternoon! That’s so weird. I will have to call them to tomorrow. Is a particular “someone” under discussion here messing with me? 🤔🕵🏼♀️😣
Substack (like all social media) is owned and run by the DoD, using “fronts” and promotes hundreds of Intel agent accounts and Masons. They are everywhere… Crawling all over Substack writing endless drivel. Even pretending to squabble with each other: Team A versus Team B.
Meaning, if you criticize one of their more popular agents, one of the army ops team may try and mess with you.
At one time, I was getting notifications daily of login attempts on my Substack account.
I have commented on Unbekoming at least twice about the obvious AI used and got no reply. It was enough for me to know that it’s an intelligence operation. I have no time or way to vet every factoid in the articles so it’s just not worth my time to read- and it could influence me in a way that is more covert. Say NO to AI generated BS. It’s all a capture.
I really enjoyed this post and your video. I have been thinking for quite a while that Lies are Unbekoming had to be AI. First because there is so much content in a short time and second because the podcast voices are the same as on Google’s NotebookLM. Today, I asked Perplexity AI if there was evidence that it was. Perplexity said the was no solid evidence. Then I asked if anyone was saying there was, and it mentioned you. So here I am and I’m glad I found you.
I'm glad you found me too! And glad that AI led you to me! It is good for some things.
Interesting about the podcast voices--you must also be a paid sub since I think that's for paid subs only. The podcast style is so chatty and conversational, it was hard to believe that AI could do that. But I'd heard Unbekoming's voice in an early interview of someone from his work, and it was nothing like that polished professional host voice.
I listened to more than one to see if the voices changed. They didn't seem to. It's almost as if they want it to be obvious so that by the time it's revealed, you've already accepted it. Very clever really, to get all the people who are scrutinizing the encroaching technocracy and do fabulous summaries of all their conspiracy literature. Talk about cognitive dissonance!
Thanks for following Perplexity to me and responding!
There was a comment this morning on Lies are Unbekoming asking about using AI, since it seemed to the commenter that at least 80% was written by AI. I replied that I knew the “podcasts“ were from Google NotebookLM. By this afternoon both comments were gone. I wonder why he/she/they can’t just admit it. It seems the first several paragraphs are original, setting the stage, and then there’s the AI. I think it’s well done and interesting, but…
Yes, that was my pattern too. I figured that my replies at least went to one person before they were deleted. I was thinking of the syllogism: AI is a lie. Unbekoming is AI. Therefore Unbekoming is a lie.
Let's try an experiment, if you're game. Post duplicate replies to this reply, and I'm going to remove one as the post author, and we'll see if it leaves a record. I'm curious as to whether UB has special privileges with Substack. But if it forces me to give a reason, I won't bother because I don't want to unintentionally hurt your Substack standing. It know that even after UB removed my comments, I could still post new ones. What do you think?
Yes, ok here is a reply. Incidentally I made a new comment saying I saw that he deleted the earlier comments and telling him I don’t care if he uses AI, but why doesn’t he admit it. It’s gone already.
Now isn't that interesting. It shows the comment was removed and still keeps your name attached. Unbekoming must be part of the Substack staff.
Hey Tereza,
I appreciate your in depth exposés that shine a light onto various online personas and publications.
Its funny, something recently told me to unsubscribe from Unbekoming. It was just a gut feeling, that there was some fakery or dishonesty involved with the publication. Makes sense now that I read this.
I don't know if you saw it but I posted a poll that was sort of based on a critique on this post ( https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-uglification-agenda-how-oligarchs ) in a poll titled "Can beautiful manmade buildings alone provide all the nourishment and beauty required for a healthy mind and soul?" ( linked here: https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/poll-of-the-month-can-beautiful-manmade ).
That is when I started sensing something was off with the Unbekoming publication.
I just posted the following notes pertaining to "A.I." generated content.
1. Substack is filled with Chatbot slop specialists publishing material intended for coaching in the closet A.I. Dependant Writers to pretend their writing is 100% written by humans.
https://substack.com/profile/43807786-gavin-mounsey/note/c-195749558
2. In this note I invited people that are writers on Substack that do not use generative A.I. for writing to drop a comment so others that value genuine undiluted human writing can support your work.
I also stated : I have no beef with those that use AI for writing and are upfront about it, but the sneaky ones that try to trick people are dishonest in my opinion and should be called out.
Thus, I also think starting a list of publications that definitely use AI to write (not spell check, I am talking generating whole paragraphs and articles and then they edit them a bit to look more human) and make no mention of generative AI assistance in writing so that people know what they are engaging with. Unfortunately I think that list would end up being massive for Substack and would grow exponentially, still I think it’s worth it.
https://substack.com/profile/43807786-gavin-mounsey/note/c-195562636
(i`ll be making this Unbekoming first on that list, so thanks for helping start off the tally. Can you nominate any other unworthy and deceptive Generative AI dependent publications for the red list?)
Lastly, 3. I shared my experience with a publication that goes by "Agy - The Buffalo Herbalist" related to a comment about A.I. Generated content, where she deleted all my comments and then blocked me out of the blue.
I describe my interactions with her in the note linked below:
https://substack.com/profile/43807786-gavin-mounsey/note/c-195826164
I suspect her content may be A.I. generated but cannot be sure, just guessing based on her erratic behavior and censorship.
Do you know any good AI detection services you can recommend.
Thanks again for the informative post.
I hope you and the family are well.
Gavin! I'm so happy to see you here. I was hoping word would get back to you. Did you see the comment where I linked all the articles in which I'd mentioned you? It turned out to be quite a list.
I'm in complete agreement with you that it's undisclosed AI that's fraudulent, but the rest may also be poison. Label them GMO ideas! Maybe AI is the self-replicating mRNA of the brain--it seeps in and starts breeding, er, cloning itself. Breeding is too organic.
I loved seeing that your mention got a response from Gabe, one of the most authentic writers and thinkers I know. And his reply was perfect: "I write for personal development so AI slop is counter-productive to that aim." That fits me too. I write in order to teach myself something new. AI would make me a consumer, not a creator. It's all about the process.
You already mentioned Mary Poindexter McLaughlin but the rest of our Apocaloptomist Club fits in the anti-AI group too: Kathleen Devanney, Margaret Anna Alice, Tonika of Visceral Adventures (visceral being the opposite of AI ;-)
Check out the Good Citizen article I linked for info on esc and on AI detection tools. I watched Doc Malik's interview of the back of esc's head but haven't read him. Frances Leader (another anti-AI) had some choice words on esc.
I wonder about our old friend Bob Malone. He sure was prolific, along with jetting between speaking engagements and interviews. There was something formulaic about his style, with folksy Grateful Dead quotes. His speaking voice let the real CIA Bob slip through.
I don't think that video summaries should count for your list but now that I tried out Riverside, I recognize those beautifully written bios and intros. It's very different than trying to distill the essence by hand. When I read Doc Malik's author bio of me, I was tempted to use it for my profile page. I still may. But I'm pretty certain it's Riverside's.
I wonder if any of us should be producing more content than is humanly possible. Attention is finite, and AI speedsters are taking up a lot of it. Isn't it a conceit to think that your content is so good, it should be all a person needs?
At the same time, I wouldn't mind an AI repository of book summaries, and UB does have a damn good formula. I would have loved to see my book summarized by his prompts. I suspect it would have made it more accessible and given it more exposure than anything else I've done. But I couldn't get over that nagging sense that something wasn't right. It certainly isn't the first--or last--time I've shot myself in the foot to remove the scruple (whose literal meaning is a pebble in the shoe).
So good to hear from you, Gavin, my authentic friend!
Why do so many popular dissidents 'speaking out' find the time to debate and argue with people online but say/do absolultely nothing about real gold standard level official evidence which proves every critic viewpoint from 2020 valid? I would also agree with no virus narrative because if any group should be promoting the following it should be them, as no virus right...so what killed people in 2020?
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/exclusiveuk-covid-19-inquiry-bereaved?utm_source=publication-search
My FREE stack is full of testimonies from the world's only two official COVID inquiries to reveal the raw truth to the lockdown and beyond.
"so what killed people in 2020?"
feardemic
Fear was one major aspect for sure.
Lies blocked me for commenting that he needed to come clean about his use of AI.
It's disgusting. I cannot possibly trust anyone that uses crap generators in any way shape or form; it's been clear for a long time now that they're unreliable at best, and any AI usage at all indicates extremely poor judgement.
As is frequently said: "If you use AI to write it, I'll use AI to read it."
I was unaware of Sasha's behavior. Thanks for enlightening me.
And 26,000 followers. My goodness! I’ve seen that name in the feed. Thanks for the heads up.
Sorry, I have no idea who you are. Pamela Drew re-stacked you, and the title caught my eye. I subscribe to Unbecoming but often delete most of those substacks as there's a kind of weird inconsistency and also extreme views as well. I did wonder how this person is able to be so prolific, so thank you for exposing that. I don't follow Sasha but I see her tweets from time to time and she always seemed bad-tempered and rude therefore leaving a bad impression of herself. It was interesting to note that she's even worse. Anyway I apologise I hadn't come across your name before but I nonetheless appreciate you answering some of my unspoken questions. Keep on keeping on, Tereza.
Don't apologize, I have no idea who you are either! There are a lot of us people in the world. Who can keep tabs on all of us? ;-)
Thank you for reading and leaving that kind response. It is a murky pond. I'm figuring it out by feel. I start with a blank page divided into 8 boxes, as a 'beat sheet' for points I want to hit. Then I record the video to develop those points. Then I try to write it more clearly and more organized than I said it. But it's still only half finished until the conversation in the comments. That's where the ideas get developed. So I'm very happy that this resonated with that feeling of unease with both UB and SL.