Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Linda O's avatar

Yes Elizabeth Nickson is a Zionist running interference for I’real.

In addition, every EN article I have scanned contains references to her (generational) wealth and her salubrious surroundings including episodes of schmoozing with the rich and famous. Mind numbing.

She also makes sure you understand that, unlike other highly successful families, hers were principled and motivated solely by good deeds.

I suspect that like all other highly successful families, hers were also Freemasons.

If she was ever ‘on the left’, she certainly kicked that into the long weeds.

Expand full comment
Guy Duperreault's avatar

hola, tereza. an interesting read for sure. (my 'home' province for 47 years was BC.)

i have found en to be a ranter and that always brings a question mark to me. and, sometimes, a kind of peek into what might be going on in the collective shadow as expressed by any particular rant. and so i am an intermittent reader of her absurdistan.

as to the use of logs to supply bc with education and medical care: that *may* have been true to a significant extent from the 50s and perhaps into the 70s because the 'need' to pay big pharma hadn't yet reached fever pitch along with the successful promulgation of the poisonous ideology of profit maximisation. the late 70s and early 80s saw the successful infiltration of greed is good business ethics, which now i consider to be likely part of the plan that successfully replaced the non-corporatist government of canada with corporatists and corporatism at the same time. and the news also skewed towards pro-business greed as good ethics.

anyway, once the corporatist government was in place, the corporations applied for tax exemptions and got them because they argued that they are the great benevolent (welfare fed) capitalists who were the economic backbone of the country. and economic wellbeing became the the the sole heart and soul of our nation. and at the same time labour cost minimisation came into full force. that included the very active breaking of unions, reducing wages by maximisation un-benefited temporary and contract workers, reducing the sizes of workforces etc.

note: i have a lot of problems with unions, especially after attending some of their absolutely absurd and distressingly stupid meetings. it was while attending them that i realised that greed is more stupefying than sex because all that the owners of everything need to do is give labour just enough money to buy beer, enjoy some sports and not be killed during work, and unions will not formed. no sane person wants to struggle with that kind of organisation and being with stupid people when it is much more fun to watch sports, drink beer and have some sex now and then.

greed is so stupefying that it always wants more, such as the painting of fire exit doors on a chinese toys r' us factory that killed 250 people when a fire in fact did happen - that wasn't put into the news in the early 90s. and of course, to maximise profits the manufacturing sector fled north america.

so... the corporations reduced or didn't pay taxes. bombardier, for example was a canadian model of a very modern corporate goodie: and at one point it owed 8 billion in back taxes that they expected they would never pay and i suspect that they didn't. i have other examples of this that i came across while researching my economics debunked writing and course. and corporate welfare became a huge cash grab! for example, i talked with loan manager of the toronto domionion bank who describes how her bank, and others, had manipulated a small business government financial assistance plan and gutted it.

what does this have to do with school and allopathic health: the middle class tax base had been decimated by corporate anti-labour practices including outsourcing manufacturing; corporations largely stopped paying taxes; corporations became highly subsidised; and things like leasing fees for access to log crown lands were ridiculously low. what was the effect? suddenly the government couldn't afford to maintain the schools or hospitals. the country's (and its province's) wealth had been transferred to the corporations.

from where did school and health get their money? hospitals started charging usurious value added tax fees such as in parking lots, their cafeterias and luxuries like having tvs in hospital rooms. they closed wards, sometimes permanently, and began to use hallways for overflow. and they began to rely on lotteries, big scale lotteries that eventually resulted in lottery fatigue on top of the horrendous overhead costs of those things. off course they reduced staff, deferred maintenance and began to outsource services to lowest bidders, that saw bc hospitals being fed dreck that was shipped to them from ontario, 4000 kilometers way, etc. ie, it was a controlled demolition of health. oh! and the mba hospital administrators saw their salaries triple or more. hmmmm.

the schools i had more direct access to as a telecom engineer because the two big universities in bc began to condo their forested lands to raise money. i was the engineer who designed the phone system of the one and assisted at times with the other. the universities also deferred maintenance while the senior administrators saw their packages double, triple or more.

and the grade schools stopped expanding and doing maintenance. as i worked with a school board in vancouver, my contact there she said to me that at one time trailers for schools would be an object of shame and now they are announced with pride. and when i taught 'economics debunked' and 'banks skanks' at my local high school, the linoleum had been worn through to expose the wood below. and everything else was in an advanced state of disrepair too. during the course i commented to my students that the quality of repair here represents the level of respect this school is getting from our community because in our age wealth is what we respect and the bestowing of it is how we show that respect. i said that the students of this school are being taught the hypocrisy of our time by having blasted on a nearly weekly basis the words of how important schools were and yet they walk on floors with linoleum that has holes in it. ie, we have bestowed on the school and them the level of our respect: emptiness and hypocrisy only.

and a similar level of hypocrisy existed with hospitals funded by lotteries and value added taxes.

so with en, and her regard as to how logging financ*ed* schooling has fundamentally aligned herself with the hypocrisy of the last 40 years and is dreamily reminiscent about the time before that when it was the proper taxation of corporations along with a significantly large tax base in a working middle class that paid for schools and health: corporations are no longer taxed and are instead subsidised and a substantial middle class doesn't exist to be taxed.

perhaps another example of how our own shadows are easily projected on to people or groups whose structure can hook onto that shadow.

fascinating stuff.

Expand full comment
78 more comments...

No posts