Truth is Like a Chamelion

Robert Malone & Mattias Desmet

It’s coming up on a year since my Malone awakening and I thought I’d put my previous 16 episodes in one place and update the news on the Breggins lawsuit.

I also go back to where it all started with Mattias Desmet. On my Yuval episode, a reader posted the Tucker Carlson interview and wrote, “Watch this interview. It’s well worth the time. Mattias talks about how they’re trying to control us and what we can do to stop this.” Having never watched Mattias directly after all the critiques I’ve read, I did so. And I found him just as smug and superior as his theory.

I’m glad I waited, though. Tucker introduces it with a clip of Malone saying, “What happened to Germans in the 1920’s? They went barking mad!” After my series on the WWII psyops, I now know that’s another lie … along with Desmet’s Iran propaganda about mothers killing their sons. And I examine his estimate that 5% of people try to do what’s right while the rest make rituals of self-sacrifice to diabolical leaders.

Curious that it’s the same percent who agreed with his doctoral thesis that 85% of all scientific studies were flawed. That didn’t make him popular at his university, he admits, but he’s used to being the only one stating the truth so it didn’t bother him.

How did he determine this? Statistics. What is it that leads people into mass formation? A belief that mysteries can be understood through rational thinking. And the more education someone has, the more likely they fall for it, he asserts. “We have to educate people to empathically resonate with knowledge. You need to feel the object you’re studying, get in touch with the eternal principles of humanity.” Is that science or religion?

I end with some research Guy Duperreault has done on The Lord of the Flies and the stories of the evil that lurks within. We examine intergenerational trauma and the identity myths that pass it on. And I look at ending the trauma by separating fact from malevolent fiction. This includes the myths of superiority by Desmet and Malone, authoritarian histories and authoritarian scriptures.

---

Dr. Hatfill, author of 3 Seconds to Midnight, is interviewed with Robert Malone where they swap theories for "burning down the house" of the HHS, privatizing the CDC, "needing an infectious disease", and BIG excavators for 40% mortality pandemics.

I summarize JJ Couey's analysis of Jill and Robert Malone talking to kids on a beach in Hawaii, his statement on "unchecked population growth," and her admiration of the Gates and Trudeau. Robert recommends the shots for kids who "are going to die anyhow" and Paul Alexander tries to get Malone and the Breggins to hug it out.

What is controlled opposition? A sheepdog sent to round up the strays and herd them through a route called ‘freedom’ back to the slaughterhouse. I list six signs of a sheepdog and examine four slaughterhouses.

Robert Malone bemoans that no big donor is funding his $25M attack on the Breggins, victim as he is of a 'cannon barrage' of press pillories. He conveniently provides links that I analyze, revealing whistleblower accusations of government fraud in contracts HE wants credit for.

I examine the lawsuit filed by Robert Malone against the Breggins and some questions that might be useful: 1) Who is Malone's attorney and what else has he done? 2) What do they call the core defamation? 3) What are the Breggins' concerns and are they valid? 4) Has Malone given conflicting information about his past? and 5) Does Malone engage in the practices over which he's suing?

Looks at the empire as a Cyclops, the eye in the pyramid. The PsyOp is when you think it’s not the “I” speaking but “we” but really it’s the Cyclops in disguise. Continues examining Robert Malone through a conversation with the anonymous blogger called A Midwestern Doctor.

Should we critique someone's actions and words without going to motive? This question is applied to Robert Malone, using the Discrepancy Analysis of Daniel Negase and the research of Peter and Ginger Breggin, Saga Hana and Mark Kulacz.

Following 'Sage Hana''s smoke signals on Robert Malone's DARPA contract for What a Smoke, I look at Mark Kulacz's connection of 2019 vaping illnesses with 'strange flu-like symptoms' and Andrew Huff's connection to the e-cig Juul. Bryan Ardis looks at snake venom as having the same symptoms as C*vd in attacking the nicotine receptors that shut off nerve functions like taste, smell, diaphragm contraction, hearing and brain function. And that nicotine is the cure. And how researcher Bing Liu died a violent death in May 2020 while investigating the venom connection.

Along with Robert Malone's multimillion dollar contracts, including nanotherapeutics, is an odd $350K one for What a Smoke. What was the DoD doing with e-cigarettes in 2015 and did it lead to the Jan 2020 WaPo article on "the mysterious vaping linked illness and deaths"? I also look at the dark side of the Shemitah and Jubilee from Isaac Middle of Down the Wombat Hole.

To my last video, Phony Maloney & WikiSpooks, JJ Couey of Gigaohm Biological did a reaction video with Mathew Crawford and Mark Kulacz, adding great information in their commentary and the sidebar chat. I relay their points and continue the conversation. But I start with why it matters citing Charles Eisenstein.

Responds to Robert Malone's interview with Aubrey Marcus, Postmortum for a Pandemic. Looks at Malone's history in biodefense and psy-ops, and how he's shaping the narrative now that rising death rates and falling birth rates are difficult for pro-vaxxers to ignore. Points out discrepancies, aka lies. Asks if the resistance was always a stepping-stone for him to be the spokesperson who provides the 'fix' to prolong the same game, different players.

The Project Veritas 'gotcha' combined scientific nonsense with journalistic playacting and anti-woke dog whistles, while casting Robert Malone as the spokesperson for the dissent. While Zelensky foments anti-Russia fervor, is Malone out to turn us anti-China, as Matt Ehret claims? Or to promote biological weapons of defense, as Gigaohm Biologic states? Or to ridicule the woke, in which he's joined by Tucker Carlson, Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch? Or to deflect any criticism of they-who-must-not-be-mentioned as a slippery slope into Nazi Germany?

Journalist Fintan Dunne invited me to do a follow-up interview on my video, Who Is Robert Malone, Really? The same day it aired, Malone posted Controlled Opposition, Black Propaganda. In this video, I look at whether his $25M defamation suit against the Breggins is against personal insults or conspiracy research, aka journalism. I outline the questions Fintan and I discussed and address the points made by Malone's colleague, including what would be his end game if he were controlled opposition.

Dr. Robert Malone is a leading voice of the opposition. However, he's filed a $25M defamation suit against Peter and Ginger Breggin for implying he's controlled opposition and part of the Deep State. I look in detail at the 'reputation disinformation' suit and whether it's designed to clear his name or silence his critics. I end with a story on why it matters.