In Defense of the Breggins, Part One
on motive, malice and mass psychosis
Now that Robert Malone has officially served the Breggins with a $25M lawsuit for defamation, what are the points and questions that should be part of their defense strategy? My suggestion is that we crowd-source ideas and research, that they can choose to incorporate at will. I’ll start with …
what is the overall question?
I’ve been reading Rudolf Steiner’s The Karma of Untruthfulness, lectures he gave in 1916 on WWI. He starts by quoting Goethe that “Wisdom lies solely in truth.” Steiner states that “… the human being needs to be prepared in his entire soul, in his whole nature, if he intends to absorb spiritual science into his soul in the right way, making it the real driving force of his life.”
Steiner defines spiritual science as clear and unprejudiced thinking, and says that few do the work to understand things in the full light of truth. Instead they illuminate “with the light that derives from their membership of a particular nation or other community.” For him, at the outbreak of a war that we might say has changed form but hasn’t ended for a century, this was the central tragedy.
What is the truth of our current situation? I think we all agree that this is a time of extreme fragility and loss: in lives, savings, health, homes, jobs and food security. Those are all statistically evident and can be personally verified by looking around. The important question is whether this is coincidence or coordinated. Is it a sad combination of nature and human nature, in the forms of incompetence, greed and fear, or an intentional plan?
Forget for the moment the questions of who, what, where and why and just focus on nature vs. intent. If the problems have emerged simultaneously but naturally, the solution is people with greater integrity and more powerful technology. If the problems are intentional and coordinated, no top-down solution will work; no matter how much they shuffle the face cards, we’re all being played. More trusted authorities and centralized systems will be temporary bribes to set us up for greater destruction.
That’s the overall question for each of us.
what is robert malone’s position?
As he stated in his interview with Aubrey Marcus, his working hypothesis is that there’s nothing nefarious going on. There is incompetence within government agencies like the HHS, greed within corporations like Pfizer, and fear within populations that makes them rush into their chains, ala Desmet. And then there’s the narcissist parasite and empire virus infecting all of us.
There are technology failures like ‘his’ mRNA vaccine that was rushed to market despite his warnings and stored at the wrong temp, turning some batches toxic. There are failures of DARPA and the DoD to protect us against Chinese pathogens. There are political failures of Biden and the woke agenda. There are global power grabs like the WHO and WEF. But there’s no coordinated malevolent intention that includes the US government, unless it’s on one side of the political divide.
If this is your position, Malone is your man. He’s an excellent candidate to reform the HHS and strengthen our biodefense capabilities. Mistakes were made and reparations are due. His position is entirely congruent with the pro-partisan government, pro-corporate, pro-pharmaceutical stance of the 80% who welcomed the ‘vaccines’.
This isn’t who Malone is representing, however. As the Daily Beast describes him:
Dr. Robert Malone became a star among COVID-19 vaccine skeptics last December [2021] when he appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Even among opponents of the vaccine, Malone stood out for his claim that the responses to the virus were driven by a phenomenon he called “mass formation psychosis”—essentially, the idea that society had been hypnotized during the pandemic. The Rogan appearance turned Malone into perhaps the most visible vaccine critic in the country …
So the most visible vaccine critic isn’t actually critical of vaccines or even mRNA vaccines, much less believing they were intended to be harmful and even deadly. Is this also the position of A Midwestern Doctor, RFK jr, Meryl Nass, Jessica Rose, Aseem Malhotra and Tessa Lena, to name a few who accept Malone’s role as spokesperson? It seems that this should be challenged, if not.
what is peter and ginger breggin’s position?
The divergence between Malone and the Breggins began as an ideological debate over Desmet’s theory of mass formation, to which Malone added the word ‘psychosis’. Here are excerpts from the Breggins’ articles on it:
Mattias Desmet: Mass Hypnosis Expert or Trojan Horse? The Full Story
The simple truth is that what Desmet calls mass formation or mass hypnosis is the response of normal human beings to extreme threats and harassments, and the loss of personal freedom. Add to that the isolation that was more widespread and rampant when he was finishing his book in November 2021 and the escalating threat to our constitutional democracies — it would be a miracle if anyone survived unscathed.
The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators
In reality, totalitarianism uses propaganda, terror, bullying, and murder to reduce the population to a helpless, dependent, and desperate state typical of victims of totalitarian dictators. This is seen in every totalitarian state. To say that nothing malicious is going on denies that people can be evil-intentioned. As for Malone’s attribution of the COVID catastrophe to “policy failures,” the globalists think COVID-19 was a great policy success! They became enormously richer and more powerful and their enemies, the constitutional democracies, became pitifully weaker.
As we shall document, Malone uncritically and vigorously promotes Desmet’s work. We do not know if he knows of Desmet’s attack on those of us writing about the globalist assault on humanity. Without citing us, he surely must be including ourselves, Peter and Ginger Breggin (2021, September) in COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey and Robert F. Kennedy (2021, November) in The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.
We hope Malone is unaware of and will now disavow Desmet’s psychiatric labeling and undermining of researchers and writers who are investigating globally organized assaults on humanity, and the accusation that we cause mass psychoses. This is unjust to the researchers and writers and can only protect those behind the increasing power of the global totalitarian institutions.
Mass Formation and Mass Psychosis: A False and Dangerous Concept that Threatens Our Freedom
Desmet writes that people who look for the leadership and planning behind the oppression are suffering from “conspiracy thinking.” They are afflicted with severe “anxiety,” “confusion,” and bewilderment” and have a “need” to blame the “supposed ‘elite’” to escape from their own personal problems (pp. 127-128).
Desmet also invokes a “more general” psychological rule, “The more anger people feel, the more intentional malice they perceive.” So your anger is invalid; you have no enemies, it’s your own “needs” and “anxieties” which drive you to blame people “outside oneself” (p. 128). …
In our earlier criticisms of Desmet/Malone, we noted that Malone did not stoop to Desmet’s level of undermining his colleagues in the freedom movement. But then Malone recently outdid Desmet.
Malone has now declared that the conservative movement can be divided into two groups. The “okay” group consists of those who have been “red-pilled” into their beliefs. But the supposed extremists, like those who examine or witness conspiracies, have been “black pilled.” It is an ugly accusation. It demeans those who thoughtfully examine the roots of totalitarianism and encourages those who wish to ridicule and condemn them.
To quote from the cited Malone article: “Unlike those who have been “black pilled” and who conclude overwhelming grand conspiracies as the explanation for everything having to do with the COVIDcrisis, I try to constrain my interpretations by the boundaries of the verifiable.” He then outlines four “psychological and political science theories which I believe can help make sense out of the otherwise confusing and non-sensical aspects of the COVIDcrisis”: mass formation psychosis/ nudge technology; groupthink in the UN, WHO, WEF; narcissistic personality disorder and political ponerology; conformity bias and incompetence. He ends with:
<And by the way, a moment of silence for the “Wikispooks” wiki, formerly located at https://wikispooks.com/ , which I had previously found very useful, but which now has been completely scrubbed from the corporate and intelligence community-controlled internet. Welcome to the Brave New World.>
A Much Better Explanation than “Mass Psychosis” — One That Encourages Freedom
What you are being told is a mass psychosis are individual people terrorized and traumatized by a totalitarian state that has invaded medicine, seized control of it, bureaucratized it, and terrorized individual members so that they are afraid to whisper a word of dissent for fear of ostracism, loss of employment, and even legal actions. This has nothing to do with psychosis; it is the normal or natural reaction to totalitarian abuse.
This normal response to severe, personalized oppression with loss of autonomy stifles free will and real freedom, and suppresses the human spirit. It is further characterized by every imaginable emotional misery, depending on the individual’s vulnerabilities. It includes guilt, shame, anxiety, chronic irritability, apathy, depression, paranoia, demoralization, and denial. As most of us have experienced, these victims of oppression have very considerable anxiety and a negative reaction to anything that stimulates awareness of their dreadful circumstances and their feelings of hopelessness about ever going free. …
As Malone gains increasing legitimacy, power, and media attention through working with us in the health freedom movement and eventually, for example, becomes director of a federal health agency—he will bring his destructive ideas to the next conservative administration. He will be welcomed back by the Deep State from which he has come and to which he continues to actively work through NIH Active, according to his November 2021 resume. And he will be applauded by the wealthy old-guard globalist Republican establishment, and the progressives, while he continues to impede the fight for individual and political liberty by denying the forces bent on destroying America and instead blaming totalitarianism on the people themselves through mass psychosis.
what’s the importance of this question?
One of the references cited by the Breggins is Diana West’s Dr. Robert Malone: A Risk Analysis. She writes:
There is no way out of the nightmare without exposing the lies about the virus, the test, and the pandemic—not to mention the transformational agendas around the "vaccine" itself. Why is it we remain mired in the fight over whether the shot is "safe and effective," over whether there exist alternative treatments, over whether "mandates" (forced medical intervention) are legal? I hope this consideration of the messaging of Dr. Malone, now at the forefront of the opposition-doctors, will help explain why we are not making progress.
I go back and forth on whether Dr. Robert Malone, "the original inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccines" talks too much to be somebody's agent of narrative-control, which is a role at the "tip of the spear" (as Malone also likes to refer to himself) of information warfare.
The thought occurred to me because of something I can't help noticing about Robert Malone. He really seems to want the world to know how Plugged In at the Hush Hush he is. Either that, or he has no filter. In any case, it's a strange space he occupies, cast against type as a leader of the opposition to the biosecurity state that rose from the lies of a faked public health crisis. This rampantly coercive state of governance the world over represents a nightmare for free people everywhere, but it is heaven on earth for the intelligence and scientific bureaucracies Malone clearly identifies with.
It's also nirvana for the billionaires, Big Pharma, World Economic Forum insiders and groomed proteges, who have gloried, and, yes, obscenely profited in this "covid" era. How jarring it is to find a number of them appearing on the "Interests" section on the LinkedIn account of Robert Malone's wife and business partner, Jill Glasspool Malone. This video shows that among Mrs. Malone's seven "influencers" are Richard Branson, Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates and Justin Trudeau—at least they were until she erased the section from her page. Also gone now are her chosen "companies," which included some of Big Pharma's biggest designers, producers and also customers of vaccines and other products: Pfizer, Eli Lilley, Sanofi, the US Department of Health and Human Services, the US Army's Institute of Infectious Diseases—plus, naturally, Bill Gates' TED Talks.
It's the biosecurity state mindset defined. While my focus is on Robert Malone, the mindset revealed on Mrs. Malone's page is not what one expects to find in the person Robert Malone introduced as his "fellow warrior" at the Defeat the Mandates March. After all, these same influencers and companies together represent and even wield the might of the crushing mandates being forced on the peoples of the world to make them submit to the covid injection agenda, and that includes the people the who showed up at the march.
"I'm a pretty deep kind of insider in terms of the government," Robert Malone volunteered to Joe Rogan in that interview, with "many friends in the intelligence community." That raised a few eyebrows. Meanwhile, the man couldn't be more deeply set and gilded inside the health-agencies-Big-Pharma-complex if he were "Tony Fauci" himself. As he also told Rogan, Robert Malone has "won literally billions of dollars in federal grants and contracts," "run over 100 clinical trials mostly in the vaccine space," is "often brought in by NIH to serve as a study section chair for awarding, you know, 80 to 120 million dollar contracts in vaccines and biodefense" (you know). No wonder, as Malone also volunteered, he has, in addition to his many pals in intel, "multiple friends at the CDC," which, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pointed out, is not a public agency so much as a vaccine company, owning 57 vaccine patents.
"I know Tony Fauci personally," Malone also offered to Rogan. "I've dealt with him my whole career, and then, and then, we had this particular outbreak, and I was tip of the spear on bringing the Ebola vaccine forward that we now call the Merck Ebola vaccine. I'm the one that got Merck involved."
Consider this: "And then, and then...." Hmm. Was Malone just getting back on his roll, or was he possibly reconsidering the direction his sentence was headed? Non-sequiturs, I've noticed, seem to break some of the more interesting chains of Malonian thought. Maybe he'd been about to say something else about Fauci. What is this cat and mouse game all about? Then again, is it even a cat and mouse game? Better, perhaps, to ask how it is in the first place that this intelligence-pharma-defense-vaccine-developing-insider rather recently found his way to the helm of what passes for Great Reset opposition in the US -- the anti-vaxx (nah), anti-covid-vaxx (nah), anti-mandate (okay), and, now, in another flabby modification, the anti-universal-vaccination movement.
West continues, “Listen to Malone describe what many of us call the ‘plandemic.’”
Where I'm at now is what we’re observing is a scripted response that has been pioneered in multiple war games by a small cadre of individuals, largely at Johns Hopkins University, largely funded by Bill and Melinda Gates and the World Economic Forum—that’s all true—involving multiple government officials. And as the war games become more sophisticated—and I've participated in some of these, too, although not the Hopkins‘ one, and that’s, that's why the strategy that Peter [Navarro] and I have advocated (of course we were labeled right-wing kooks) in the Washington Times is still a very balanced approach: jab the elders and the ones at high risk.
West concludes, “That's some pretty jaw-dropping information flowing there, at least right up to a sentence-ending non-sequitors about his balanced approach to the ‘jab.’” She quotes from November 2021, Kennedy describing the same sequence of events this way:
When I researched my book what I learned was that this [2019 pandemic simulation] event, Event 201, was not a one-time occurrence. We found 20 separate pandemic simulations beginning in 2000. One thing they had in common -- most of them Bill Gates was involved in, Tony Fauci was involved in -- but every one of them the CIA was involved in. The CIA wrote the script, high-level CIA officials participated in every one of those pandemic simulations.
And they involved hundreds of thousands of people. They were conducted secretly. They used frontline workers, they were training police, and hospital systems and utilities in Europe, in Italy, in Germany, in Canada, in Australia, all at the same time, to do a response to a pandemic, but it was not a public health response. It was a response to use the pandemic for something else.
So they practiced again and again and again: How to use the pandemic as a pretext for imposing totalitarian controls and for obliterating liberal democracy across the planet.
To defend the Breggins is to defend our right to answer this question Malone ridicules as ‘black-pilled’ conspiracy theory. It’s defending our right to not have our anger at ‘perceived malice’ medicated as signs of our ‘psychosis.' But most of all, it’s defending our right to stand with Robert F. Kennedy against the totalitarian controls obliterating liberal democracy across the planet. So why isn’t Robert F. Kennedy defending the Breggins?
For more on Robert F. Kennedy, here’s Infodemic: RFK & the RAF:
Asks why the spread of information is the virus that most worries them. Examines Robert F. Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci as metajournalism that puts the virus as the "March madness champion" of many attempted pandemics. Looks at The United States of Fear by Mark McDonald and why it says we're not in a data war but a psychological war. Analyzes the instability of a tightly organized delusion system and why sacrifice increases the loyalty to it.
and this is Conspiracy Theorist as the New Heretic:
Responding to Russell Brand's interview of Brad, I examine obedience to the "technotheocracy" by looking at guilt as a more potent form of fear. I look at the 1987 defunding of Peter Duesberg as the replacement of science and empirical data with the religion of profit-friendly woke-speak. I define conspiracy theory as what investigative journalism used to be before it was replaced with infotainment. I propose propaganda as the interweaving of truth and lies, and Trump as a double-agent who turned truth into heresy by association and made villains into heroes by opposition. I cite Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi on the victim as sacred object, as Brad puts it. I applaud the diabolical cleverness of the strategy to term all power as privilege and make us give it up willingly.
"As he stated in his interview with Aubrey Marcus, his working hypothesis is that there’s nothing nefarious going on."
That alone tells us all we need to know.
Today my ex told me that I was right about her long time friend.
I thought about how ... Barely knew her, just didn't like something about her.
Dug deeper today... It's the charm and the confidence that irks me.
That's what irked me with Malone from the start. I felt alone because all of the "cool ones" like the last American vagabond alt media people loved this guy.
Malone, despite realizing horrible truths always seems calm and collected.
Meanwhile Dr Kory is pretty upset and realizing that the medical profession and the science behind it is corrupted.
I used to look at people naive to the corruption as innocent. I used to excuse their huge holes in awareness.
Today, I either see them as naive or willingly complicit.
There's no in between. Are you cool with what happened or are you upset?
Malone plays the middle. As if there is a middle during a democide.
No sir, either you are insane with denial or you are pretending.
I'm a human being and forgive me but when I see inhuman behavior of false civility and artificial calm in the face of danger, you sir, do not seem reasonable.
Maybe more people are seeing this issue because fk, we're not seeing justice despite the "honorable efforts" of our heroes.