Today my ex told me that I was right about her long time friend.
I thought about how ... Barely knew her, just didn't like something about her.
Dug deeper today... It's the charm and the confidence that irks me.
That's what irked me with Malone from the start. I felt alone because all of the "cool ones" like the last American vagabond alt media people loved this guy.
Malone, despite realizing horrible truths always seems calm and collected.
Meanwhile Dr Kory is pretty upset and realizing that the medical profession and the science behind it is corrupted.
I used to look at people naive to the corruption as innocent. I used to excuse their huge holes in awareness.
Today, I either see them as naive or willingly complicit.
There's no in between. Are you cool with what happened or are you upset?
Malone plays the middle. As if there is a middle during a democide.
No sir, either you are insane with denial or you are pretending.
I'm a human being and forgive me but when I see inhuman behavior of false civility and artificial calm in the face of danger, you sir, do not seem reasonable.
Maybe more people are seeing this issue because fk, we're not seeing justice despite the "honorable efforts" of our heroes.
What an excellent article you linked below, Rob. How did you find Miri AF? I'm going to need to keep that handy and cite in something so I don't lose it. She makes great points about the flip side of 'dividing and conquering.' It's certainly a ploy to conquer with a false unification. The cheap and easy way is always a common enemy/ common superiority. Uniting on a common goal is damn near impossible, in my experience.
You and Margie were more prescient than me but I only read him and didn't see him speak--and when I did, I had that heartsinking realization my friend was right. I liked his farm ethic, his analytical style, his Friday funnies and Sunday shorts--without realizing they were either taken from other people or designed to make me like him. But there was an appeal and comfort to thinking there was a wise, down-to-earth, even cuddly kind of guy in our corner. So I sympathize with those taken in by him.
And congrats on being on good enough terms with your ex that she tells you you were right! I said to mine recently that he was right about something and I had to thank him for not having listened to me. He said, "Well if you're going to thank me for that, there's a lot more where that came from..." acknowledging times I'd been right when he hadn't listened. ;-)
I admittedly went "uh oh" when I heard Malone say on Bannon that he was in contact with Whitney Webb. This was presented *I think* as his efforts to learn more about Great Reset stuff, but it occurred to me that Whitney was skating into some danger. And now she is on CHD, I think.
The chilling part is that he's talking about a horrible thing with such calmness.
I remember at the start, he was on the Allison Morrow show and I paid for a question.
I brought up the 1986 act that indemnified vaccines and Malone talked like he didn't know of this.
Wouldn't someone in the industry have known why it's a cash cow?
Ugh, anyway back then I felt like most who questioned con-vid were fooled by him. Nowadays, I'm glad that calling out his inconsistencies is no longer a bad thing. Obviously, many decry "don't divide the movement", but unity is not strength.
What the Breggins said is exactly what I fear: "As Malone gains increasing legitimacy, power, and media attention through working with us in the health freedom movement and eventually, for example, becomes director of a federal health agency" You know his sob story: he lost his career, his income, everything, just to save us. Like hell he did. He is aiming for Fauci's job.
Yes! In the brief moments after I suspected him and before he knew I did, I posted on one of his articles that the question was who would replace Fauci? He liked my comment, not getting the implication. I think it's in the next installment that I link to a poll on a WeLoveTrump article about Malone that asks if he should replace Fauci. It's an older article. But now I think he's aiming higher, to be Fauci's boss as the head of the HHS. That's why I think he's written those two articles about how he would reform them.
Thanks for this. Peter Breggin also deserves our thanks for exposing the fake science being used in psychiatry (the "chemical imbalance in the brain" stuff) -- that's how I first learned about him several years before the Covid scamdemic. In fact, the chronic mental health crisis caused by the misuse of psych drugs like SSRIs can be thought of as another scamdemic.
I still think that the mass formation idea has some merit in explaining why people were so willing to go along with the scamdemic, but it's just a small part of the bigger story. I agree with the Breggins that people were pushed and prodded into that mass formation; it didn't just happen spontaneously.
Yes, I know a couple people, both homeless, who feel that SSRIs changed their brain chemistry and put them into a lifelong battle for their sanity. In one case, it's the mother who regrets having done this to her son. In the other, it's a sweet young man who's one of the best-read people I've ever known. He read my book in a week, and it ain't easy. He's read the Breggins and RFK. The 'free little libraries' people build are his friends.
The Breggins make a good point that mass formation doesn't make sense when people weren't even allowed to get together. Personally, I think that behavioral psychology and cognitive dissonance are better explanations. Once people can be coerced into doing something, their belief systems will change to match because the alternative is believing they've made a terrible mistake. I talk about it in this episode: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/cogni-covid-dissonance.
Speaking of reading your book, I am definitely not able to read it in just a week. Could I write questions to you occasionally by email? My email address is marka@pobox.com . Thanks.
Thank you, Tereza, for defending the Breggins! Yes, I wonder who else is going to take a break from oh reading the Bible, to defend them! This will truly be a barometer...
I'm only on the first lecture but they're fascinating. It was one of the commenters on Did Fascists Win WWII? who alerted me to him. I thought my Socio-Spirituality was a new thing but I'm happy to know it has a century-long precedent in spiritual science.
Thanks to you and Alex for alerting me to these videos. I used to watch JP Sears but then felt he was too mean-funny and that ridicule was my least favorite type of humor. But for someone who's suing for defamation, I think that engaging in ridicule is a very pointed contrast to the Breggins who give him the benefit of the doubt in saying, "We hope Malone is unaware of and will now disavow Desmet’s psychiatric labeling and undermining of researchers and writers who are investigating globally organized assaults on humanity, and the accusation that we cause mass psychoses. This is unjust to the researchers and writers and can only protect those behind the increasing power of the global totalitarian institutions."
Steiner wrote a book about bees. Not sure but i think the name of it might be The Secret Life Of Bees. I have it but I am not sure of the name. I sorta took it that Steiner was hinting that the ruling class uses something similar to the bee model to rule it's universe. Maybe not its been a long time since I read it. It was interesting tho....
The Being of Bees and Nine Lectures on Bees, a series given to workmen, which is interesting. I'm just doing a search, don't mistake me for being knowledgable. It seems like he was saying bees were related to the true order of things: "The unconscious wisdom contained in the beehive — the hive is in reality permeated by love — and how this relates to the human experiences of health, civilization, and the cosmos is amply described in this unique book."
Fascinating guy. The Secret Life of Bees is a Sue Monk Kidd book, which I did read. Also good but waaaay different ;-) Thanks for drawing my attention to this.
You said: "mRNA vaccine that was rushed to market despite his warnings and stored at the wrong temp, turning some batches toxic." From reading AMidwesternDoctor on the subject, I think the mRNA is more toxic than the other ingredients, so when the mRNA disintegrated at warmer temperatures, the injections became somewhat less toxic than those that had been "properly" stored. I think every injection was toxic. It's just that most weren't toxic enough to kill most people soon.
"He then gets the second shot and has adverse affects from one of the bad batches. Aubrey says, “you mean a hot batch?” Robert says, “Huh?” Aubrey mentions the theory of Dr. Aditi Bhargava that the hot batches are ones that were stored properly and are working as designed. Robert, who seems to have never heard the term ‘hot batch,’ says this theory fits his working hypothesis but then reverses it—the bad batches were stored improperly which made the cholesterol crystals in them aggregate, giving them more toxicity. He acts like he’s agreeing but flips it."
Another reason I think AMD should listen to what Malone's saying to the rest of the world before s/he defends him.
Excellent review of all the data, Len! In the comments of the first article you cited is where I had my long conversation with AMD about Malone, which I posted in this article: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-psyop-cyclops.
Oh, excellent Sanjoy. This even researches the companies he's worked for. I downloaded it to send to the friend of the Breggins who's helping with their case. Thanks for alerting me to it.
TC, have you seen AMWD's article? Another very excellent one and quite a few pro-Breggin comments there which you would enjoy and could no doubt add to.
I love Tessa! Of everyone I mentioned, I have the deepest relationship with her and much mutual respect. And she is very outspoken on the mass extermination agenda. It confuses me that this discrepancy between her views and Malone's doesn't bother her.
I think the episode I record later today might address your point. I hope that you and Tessa both read it, since I respect you both greatly. The question is whether Robert Malone is on the enemy's side and a traitor pretending to be part of the opposition. I'm not answering that question, I'm just defining it.
If he is, and we don't ask the question out of politeness or a desire for unity, we're following a general who's been coordinating with the enemy from the beginning, who will speak for us and coordinate the terms of our surrender (apology? no mandates? 'fixing' mRNA?) And you, I and Tessa agree that the medical agenda is depopulation. So we're not talking about ideological differences, we're examining the evidence to figure out whether Robert Malone is on the side of mass and indiscriminate murder. I'm not saying he is, I'm saying the question needs to be examined or we also become complicit, out of a desire not to 'offend.'
If Robert Malone stands with you, I, Tessa, RFK, Tess Lawrie and many, many others against the depopulation agenda, he should be more than eager to explain how he was fooled into participating in it for so many years, with the Merck Ebola vaccine, the e-cigarette DoD prototype, the failure of the DOMANE system to test HCQ or IVM, and his agreement not to warn about mRNA as a 'professional courtesy.' He should apologize for calling the Breggins and others who see this agenda 'kooky conspiracy theorists.'
And, one more thing, we're not turning around and firing on our own troops. Malone is 'the leading vaccine critic' to the rest of the world, not one of the troops. Questioning whether we should be his troops and get in line behind him isn't the same as firing on him.
agreed that we need to steer clear of anyone wearing a white hat who would steer us to the cattle cars, be that malone or anyone else. my litmus test is cui bono. usually it's the money but sometimes it's status or ego or just knuckleheads duking it out in the sandbox. amateur hour stuff.
looking forward to your analysis and appreciate all you do Tereza
Thank you, nymd. May I have your permission to put our conversation into the episode? I'm wanting to clarify what I believe to be the stakes, and that this isn't a personal vendetta. There are so many other topics I'm eager to get to, but this one keeps choosing me.
You said at the end: "I applaud the diabolical cleverness of the strategy to term all power as privilege and make us give it up willingly."
I don't understand what you mean by that. Who calls all power privilege? Who wants who to give it up? I favor the term "Power to the People", meaning to the common people. I consider it a right of the people.
Thanks for giving me the invitation to clarify. When I looked at that statement earlier, I thought that it was too deep into my thinking to really translate. There's a draft episode I've been percolating called "Ashamed to be Human." It looks at all the ways that we're told that anything we have--a home, a job, a safe neighborhood--is because we're privileged and have taken that from someone else. We have 'white privilege,' 'male privilege,' and 'first-world problems.' Rather than seeing security as a right, we're told it's an unearned advantage. So we're turned against the 'haves' to fight for the 'have-nots' instead of creating productive communities.
"As he stated in his interview with Aubrey Marcus, his working hypothesis is that there’s nothing nefarious going on."
That alone tells us all we need to know.
But the rest of the article was an awesome read in any case! Nice work there!
Today my ex told me that I was right about her long time friend.
I thought about how ... Barely knew her, just didn't like something about her.
Dug deeper today... It's the charm and the confidence that irks me.
That's what irked me with Malone from the start. I felt alone because all of the "cool ones" like the last American vagabond alt media people loved this guy.
Malone, despite realizing horrible truths always seems calm and collected.
Meanwhile Dr Kory is pretty upset and realizing that the medical profession and the science behind it is corrupted.
I used to look at people naive to the corruption as innocent. I used to excuse their huge holes in awareness.
Today, I either see them as naive or willingly complicit.
There's no in between. Are you cool with what happened or are you upset?
Malone plays the middle. As if there is a middle during a democide.
No sir, either you are insane with denial or you are pretending.
I'm a human being and forgive me but when I see inhuman behavior of false civility and artificial calm in the face of danger, you sir, do not seem reasonable.
Maybe more people are seeing this issue because fk, we're not seeing justice despite the "honorable efforts" of our heroes.
What an excellent article you linked below, Rob. How did you find Miri AF? I'm going to need to keep that handy and cite in something so I don't lose it. She makes great points about the flip side of 'dividing and conquering.' It's certainly a ploy to conquer with a false unification. The cheap and easy way is always a common enemy/ common superiority. Uniting on a common goal is damn near impossible, in my experience.
You and Margie were more prescient than me but I only read him and didn't see him speak--and when I did, I had that heartsinking realization my friend was right. I liked his farm ethic, his analytical style, his Friday funnies and Sunday shorts--without realizing they were either taken from other people or designed to make me like him. But there was an appeal and comfort to thinking there was a wise, down-to-earth, even cuddly kind of guy in our corner. So I sympathize with those taken in by him.
And congrats on being on good enough terms with your ex that she tells you you were right! I said to mine recently that he was right about something and I had to thank him for not having listened to me. He said, "Well if you're going to thank me for that, there's a lot more where that came from..." acknowledging times I'd been right when he hadn't listened. ;-)
I admittedly went "uh oh" when I heard Malone say on Bannon that he was in contact with Whitney Webb. This was presented *I think* as his efforts to learn more about Great Reset stuff, but it occurred to me that Whitney was skating into some danger. And now she is on CHD, I think.
Again, great, but boy...stay strong, Whitney.
I never saw his charm, just his arrogance and something indefinably chilling.
Arrogance! Yes, same with her friend.
The chilling part is that he's talking about a horrible thing with such calmness.
I remember at the start, he was on the Allison Morrow show and I paid for a question.
I brought up the 1986 act that indemnified vaccines and Malone talked like he didn't know of this.
Wouldn't someone in the industry have known why it's a cash cow?
Ugh, anyway back then I felt like most who questioned con-vid were fooled by him. Nowadays, I'm glad that calling out his inconsistencies is no longer a bad thing. Obviously, many decry "don't divide the movement", but unity is not strength.
https://miriaf.co.uk/do-i-want-to-divide-the-movement-absolutely/
I mean, to sue an elderly couple for 25 million because he has no nuts to confront their arguments?
Give me a break, this is really shameful.
What the Breggins said is exactly what I fear: "As Malone gains increasing legitimacy, power, and media attention through working with us in the health freedom movement and eventually, for example, becomes director of a federal health agency" You know his sob story: he lost his career, his income, everything, just to save us. Like hell he did. He is aiming for Fauci's job.
Yes! In the brief moments after I suspected him and before he knew I did, I posted on one of his articles that the question was who would replace Fauci? He liked my comment, not getting the implication. I think it's in the next installment that I link to a poll on a WeLoveTrump article about Malone that asks if he should replace Fauci. It's an older article. But now I think he's aiming higher, to be Fauci's boss as the head of the HHS. That's why I think he's written those two articles about how he would reform them.
I'm so glad I found your newsletter.
Wow. Thanks!
Thanks for this. Peter Breggin also deserves our thanks for exposing the fake science being used in psychiatry (the "chemical imbalance in the brain" stuff) -- that's how I first learned about him several years before the Covid scamdemic. In fact, the chronic mental health crisis caused by the misuse of psych drugs like SSRIs can be thought of as another scamdemic.
I still think that the mass formation idea has some merit in explaining why people were so willing to go along with the scamdemic, but it's just a small part of the bigger story. I agree with the Breggins that people were pushed and prodded into that mass formation; it didn't just happen spontaneously.
Yes, I know a couple people, both homeless, who feel that SSRIs changed their brain chemistry and put them into a lifelong battle for their sanity. In one case, it's the mother who regrets having done this to her son. In the other, it's a sweet young man who's one of the best-read people I've ever known. He read my book in a week, and it ain't easy. He's read the Breggins and RFK. The 'free little libraries' people build are his friends.
The Breggins make a good point that mass formation doesn't make sense when people weren't even allowed to get together. Personally, I think that behavioral psychology and cognitive dissonance are better explanations. Once people can be coerced into doing something, their belief systems will change to match because the alternative is believing they've made a terrible mistake. I talk about it in this episode: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/cogni-covid-dissonance.
Speaking of reading your book, I am definitely not able to read it in just a week. Could I write questions to you occasionally by email? My email address is marka@pobox.com . Thanks.
Yes, I'll send you a note so you have mine, which is just my first name at thirdparadigm.org.
Thank you, Tereza, for defending the Breggins! Yes, I wonder who else is going to take a break from oh reading the Bible, to defend them! This will truly be a barometer...
Anybody that has taken the time to read Steiner deserves a reply. Hats off to you. Malone did a victory lap on our face. Like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_tXQo1yz0o
I'm only on the first lecture but they're fascinating. It was one of the commenters on Did Fascists Win WWII? who alerted me to him. I thought my Socio-Spirituality was a new thing but I'm happy to know it has a century-long precedent in spiritual science.
Thanks to you and Alex for alerting me to these videos. I used to watch JP Sears but then felt he was too mean-funny and that ridicule was my least favorite type of humor. But for someone who's suing for defamation, I think that engaging in ridicule is a very pointed contrast to the Breggins who give him the benefit of the doubt in saying, "We hope Malone is unaware of and will now disavow Desmet’s psychiatric labeling and undermining of researchers and writers who are investigating globally organized assaults on humanity, and the accusation that we cause mass psychoses. This is unjust to the researchers and writers and can only protect those behind the increasing power of the global totalitarian institutions."
Steiner wrote a book about bees. Not sure but i think the name of it might be The Secret Life Of Bees. I have it but I am not sure of the name. I sorta took it that Steiner was hinting that the ruling class uses something similar to the bee model to rule it's universe. Maybe not its been a long time since I read it. It was interesting tho....
The Being of Bees and Nine Lectures on Bees, a series given to workmen, which is interesting. I'm just doing a search, don't mistake me for being knowledgable. It seems like he was saying bees were related to the true order of things: "The unconscious wisdom contained in the beehive — the hive is in reality permeated by love — and how this relates to the human experiences of health, civilization, and the cosmos is amply described in this unique book."
Fascinating guy. The Secret Life of Bees is a Sue Monk Kidd book, which I did read. Also good but waaaay different ;-) Thanks for drawing my attention to this.
-Yes, I feel you. And doubt Malone will change his fundamental tune until he's dug out of his bunker.
Pretty depressing. /fk that
Excellent thinking and analysis! thank you for investigating and breaking it down! grateful
You said: "mRNA vaccine that was rushed to market despite his warnings and stored at the wrong temp, turning some batches toxic." From reading AMidwesternDoctor on the subject, I think the mRNA is more toxic than the other ingredients, so when the mRNA disintegrated at warmer temperatures, the injections became somewhat less toxic than those that had been "properly" stored. I think every injection was toxic. It's just that most weren't toxic enough to kill most people soon.
Exactly Len, but it's Malone who says the ones stored at the wrong temp became toxic. See my episode https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/phony-maloney-and-wikispooks about his interview by Aubrey Marcus. I write this about Malone:
"He then gets the second shot and has adverse affects from one of the bad batches. Aubrey says, “you mean a hot batch?” Robert says, “Huh?” Aubrey mentions the theory of Dr. Aditi Bhargava that the hot batches are ones that were stored properly and are working as designed. Robert, who seems to have never heard the term ‘hot batch,’ says this theory fits his working hypothesis but then reverses it—the bad batches were stored improperly which made the cholesterol crystals in them aggregate, giving them more toxicity. He acts like he’s agreeing but flips it."
Another reason I think AMD should listen to what Malone's saying to the rest of the world before s/he defends him.
I see. I just now checked to see what AMD has said about Malone. Here's what I found. (Maybe I'll write a post about it.)
3/26/23
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-downward-slide-of-americas-healthcare
says Malone wrote excellent articles on how to reform the HHS
3/4/23
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-is-the-forgotten-side-of-water
references Malone on pettiness in organizations
2/24/23
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/a-major-news-service-is-finally-covering
says Malone met Dowd and decided to support him to make a real impact
2/16/23
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-forgotten-lessons-of-the-militarys
says Malone shared info from Malone's article about the military's disastrous anthrax vaccination campaign
1/13/23
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-happened-to-the-covid-19-vaccine
references Malone's article written by another doctor about vaccine trial patients
12/26/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-does-peter-hotez-think-we-are
says Malone tweeted AMD's article on German data
11/23/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-is-the-third-party-technique
says Malone explained that gov't agencies often exceed their authority
11/20/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-is-causing-the-explosion-of
references a Malone video on corruption
11/13/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-causes-alzheimers-disease
references Malone re a money problem with vaccine manufacturing (See 6/5/22)
9/25/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-sudden-death
says Malone shared on publication bias & retaliation re vaccines
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10730-022-09479-7
https://www.cureus.com/articles/110238-examples-of-outcome-reporting-bias-in-vaccine-studies-illustrating-how-perpetuating-medical-consensus-can-impede-progress-in-public-health#!/
8/22/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-are-the-top-vaccine-officials
references Malone's article/s on issues plaguing the HHS
8/6/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/where-did-covid-19-come-from-and
says Malone says bioweapons treaty allows bioweapon research
6/24/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/who-was-responsible-for-the-botched
says Malone exposed WEF's corrupt Young Leaders program
6/17/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/this-is-real-advice-from-the-cdc
says Malone & Kirsch often discuss Desmet's "Mass Formation"
6/5/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-the-covid-vaccines-were-never
references Malone re a money problem with vaccine manufacturing
4/16/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/how-corruption-dictates-the-practice
says Malone is Dr. Nass's colleague & references Malone's article on NIH corruption
3/12/22
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/who-remembers-freedom-fries
says PR poisoned journalism, not advocacy as Malone said
Excellent review of all the data, Len! In the comments of the first article you cited is where I had my long conversation with AMD about Malone, which I posted in this article: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-psyop-cyclops.
Also on similar lines to West's analysis:
"Dr. Malone – Dark Vaccine Wizard"
https://mega.nz/file/1M4h0RDB#o8VnDg8mcOYim9bhaKUlCAhNFkQvKnzWUXICio9ZQso
Oh, excellent Sanjoy. This even researches the companies he's worked for. I downloaded it to send to the friend of the Breggins who's helping with their case. Thanks for alerting me to it.
TC, have you seen AMWD's article? Another very excellent one and quite a few pro-Breggin comments there which you would enjoy and could no doubt add to.
https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/how-the-fda-buried-the-dangers-of/comments?utm_source=substack%2Csubstack&publication_id=645524&post_id=112426040&utm_medium=email%2Cemail&isFreemail=true&comments=true
in defense of Tessa, she was possibly the very first on substack to realize that the plandemic was cover for mass extermination.
I love Tessa! Of everyone I mentioned, I have the deepest relationship with her and much mutual respect. And she is very outspoken on the mass extermination agenda. It confuses me that this discrepancy between her views and Malone's doesn't bother her.
tessa and i think alike on this: we're facing down the most devastating enemy the human race has ever seen. that means all hands on deck, right?
and some of us turn around and fire on our own troops?
I think the episode I record later today might address your point. I hope that you and Tessa both read it, since I respect you both greatly. The question is whether Robert Malone is on the enemy's side and a traitor pretending to be part of the opposition. I'm not answering that question, I'm just defining it.
If he is, and we don't ask the question out of politeness or a desire for unity, we're following a general who's been coordinating with the enemy from the beginning, who will speak for us and coordinate the terms of our surrender (apology? no mandates? 'fixing' mRNA?) And you, I and Tessa agree that the medical agenda is depopulation. So we're not talking about ideological differences, we're examining the evidence to figure out whether Robert Malone is on the side of mass and indiscriminate murder. I'm not saying he is, I'm saying the question needs to be examined or we also become complicit, out of a desire not to 'offend.'
If Robert Malone stands with you, I, Tessa, RFK, Tess Lawrie and many, many others against the depopulation agenda, he should be more than eager to explain how he was fooled into participating in it for so many years, with the Merck Ebola vaccine, the e-cigarette DoD prototype, the failure of the DOMANE system to test HCQ or IVM, and his agreement not to warn about mRNA as a 'professional courtesy.' He should apologize for calling the Breggins and others who see this agenda 'kooky conspiracy theorists.'
And, one more thing, we're not turning around and firing on our own troops. Malone is 'the leading vaccine critic' to the rest of the world, not one of the troops. Questioning whether we should be his troops and get in line behind him isn't the same as firing on him.
agreed that we need to steer clear of anyone wearing a white hat who would steer us to the cattle cars, be that malone or anyone else. my litmus test is cui bono. usually it's the money but sometimes it's status or ego or just knuckleheads duking it out in the sandbox. amateur hour stuff.
looking forward to your analysis and appreciate all you do Tereza
Thank you, nymd. May I have your permission to put our conversation into the episode? I'm wanting to clarify what I believe to be the stakes, and that this isn't a personal vendetta. There are so many other topics I'm eager to get to, but this one keeps choosing me.
sure.
my cynicism about ghost rider in the sky is hardly a secret at this point ;)
"The question is whether Robert Malone is on the enemy's side and a traitor pretending to be part of the opposition."
Question? ; )
Good piece.
You said at the end: "I applaud the diabolical cleverness of the strategy to term all power as privilege and make us give it up willingly."
I don't understand what you mean by that. Who calls all power privilege? Who wants who to give it up? I favor the term "Power to the People", meaning to the common people. I consider it a right of the people.
Thanks for giving me the invitation to clarify. When I looked at that statement earlier, I thought that it was too deep into my thinking to really translate. There's a draft episode I've been percolating called "Ashamed to be Human." It looks at all the ways that we're told that anything we have--a home, a job, a safe neighborhood--is because we're privileged and have taken that from someone else. We have 'white privilege,' 'male privilege,' and 'first-world problems.' Rather than seeing security as a right, we're told it's an unearned advantage. So we're turned against the 'haves' to fight for the 'have-nots' instead of creating productive communities.