Is Malone the Zelensky of the Covid Con?

two actors, two theaters of war, two fake oppositions

Also available on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v27su9q-is-malone-the-zelensky-of-the-covid-con.html.

The Project Veritas 'gotcha' combined scientific nonsense with journalistic playacting and anti-woke dog whistles, while casting Robert Malone as the spokesperson for the dissent. While Zelensky foments anti-Russia fervor, is Malone out to turn us anti-China, as Matt Ehret claims? Or to promote biological weapons of defense, as Gigaohm Biological states? Or to ridicule the woke, in which he's joined by Tucker Carlson, Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch? Or to deflect any criticism of they-who-must-not-be-mentioned as a slippery slope into Nazi Germany?

With apologies to those who read but don’t watch, the text is not redundant with the video. My purpose is always to further my own thoughts, teach myself something new, and continue the conversation with myself—in the form of all of you! Thank you for helping me figure this all out, and giving me so many good ideas to consider and resources to respond to.

I begin by looking at the bogus science behind Pfizer-goes-on-a-first-date. My first reference is Sasha Latypova in the excellent Due Diligence & Art, where she’s posted “OMG! Pfizer is MUTATING COVID!!!” If three exclamation points don’t give it away, she’s taking this with a shaker of salt:

The perpetrators desperately, at all cost, need you to to believe that “mutating viruses in a lab” achieves some scary result, that then can be “leaked”. That anyone can do it, even a PhD student in their garage. That our enemies are doing it and will “release” a super scary bug any time now, unless the Government is “prepared” by making a stockpile of “predictive vaccines” that can be deployed in DAYS after a new scary virus is detected in China. Or Timbuktu.

…they convince everyone by propaganda and some skillfully deployed chemicals that the scary viruses will be released (or leaked), then sell government “protection”. This time, in this phase, they are going for the real kill - they are preparing to orchestrate the global panic by pretending that a scary mutated predictive evolutionary virus was indeed leaked from a lab (and didn’t jump from a bat in the market like last time). They already have all the video footage of people dropping dead in the streets and other promotional propaganda materials ready to go. They will announce it in some remote location, and the Johns Hopkins virus tracker will go in overdrive and all red all over the world. Then within days they will have the “life saving vaccine!” and proceed mandating, quarantining, injecting, etc. under complete panic, claiming all of their own kills on the scary mutated virus.

Please DO NOT FALL FOR THIS!

Sasha, who sees this as a set-up by the DoD, believes that PV was played.

I then make some observations on the absurdity of the idea that, after testing the last ‘vaccine’ on eight mice before global deployment, Pfizer would be infecting zoos full of monkeys with different variants and waiting to see what happens for successive generations … of the virus, the monkeys don’t last long enough to replicate. Really?

The next reference is to JJ Couey’s Gigaohm Biological in a reaction video called Study Hall: Carlson & Malone Discuss Scooby Doo. He is a former biology professor, I believe, and goes into why gain-of-function viruses created in a lab that cause pandemics are impossible. I don’t understand all of the science but his points are logical and worth checking out for yourself.

JJ first responds to Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch on a conference video talking about the PV video and what a great job it did in exposing what goes on with the revolving door between pharma and regulatory agencies. They see this as a turning point and Kirsch is starting a superPAC to elect Robert F. Kennedy for President. But Malone has to go to his next interview with Tucker Carlson. There he talks about how this Pfizer exec has no morals and this is the kind of person in high level positions responding to a virus that has killed millions. Not remdesevir. Not ventilators and lack of early treatment. Not lockdowns. The Virus.

Tucker then shows the second video where the second PV reporter comes out of the back holding the computer with the only copy of the incriminating interview and confronts ‘Jordan,’ who says he was just trying to impress his date. He calls the police saying “There are too many white people around, I don’t feel safe.” A skirmish ensues where they wrestle over the computer, which scuttles from one person to another, and ‘Jordan,’ in the last scene, hurls himself in front of vans that might have the goods.

That’s how most undercover operations go, right, where you do the big ‘gotcha’ at the end to see what the reaction is? It works well with the Mafia. And let us count the anti-woke dog whistles: 1) he’s gay, 2) he’s a person of color who clearly did not get his position on his qualifications and professionalism, and 3) ‘there’s too many white people, I don’t feel safe’? REALLY? This is a ham-handed script and at this point, we know beyond a doubt that it’s all staged and PV is in on it, along with Malone. For Kirsch and Tucker, they’re either gullible or part of the con, you choose.

---

I created the comparison in my title because Zelensky is an actor fomenting anti-Russia hatred. Is Malone an actor whose role is to turn us against China? That’s what Matt Ehret posits in Why is Robert Malone Pushing Anti-China Propaganda? One of his examples is a guest post by Claire Lopez back in October that she titled “The Role of Biological Warfare in China’s Drive for Global Hegemony.” Although I took Malone at face value at the time, I posted this in the comments:

I'm sorry, Dr. Malone, but this reads like US propaganda to me by the standards that you've established elsewhere and the rhetorical devices you've outlined. It makes general claims of motives and cites a history as it's been taught in the US. It also comes at a time when the US is doing blatantly antagonistic things, like Pelosi & Taiwan, to ramp up public outrage and support for a war against China.

There are credible hypotheses, with evidence, that the 'Wuhan' strain was spread from Fort Dedrick (in your and my neck of the woods) through infected soldiers in 'war games' simultaneous to the outbreak. And didn't a study just come out showing it originated in Chapel Hill, NC?

I don't know much about China but thanks to you and others, I know a lot more now about the US use of bioterrorism. Matt Ehret just posted a conversation on What Makes China Tick? He and Cynthia Chung have an interesting perspective, along with Jeff J. Brown. Caitlin Johnstone just published "A New Study Finds the Rest of the World Supports China and Russia." I haven't listened/ read either yet but they offer a different perspective.

And in response to another comment I wrote:

Hi, David. I absolutely don't think that Dr Malone is telling his readers what to think here. But I'm not so sure about Clare Lopez and her LLC. Most journalists don't have LLCs but thinktanks, designed to tell people what to think, do.

It starts with her title of China's Drive for Global Hegemony. That runs contradictory to what China has done in the past but is absolutely what the US has done. The war in Ukraine is 100% over US global hegemony through NATO and the petrodollar. The US has 800+ military bases in other countries. That's global hegemony.

I don't know what I think about China, frankly. They've been an early adopter of WEF policies of depopulation and lockdowns. They hold enough US Treasury bonds to buy up all the farmland and real estate out from under us. Biden just gave them our strategic oil reserves. His and Hunter's nefarious dealings with them make me wonder how else we're beholden to them. But the long history of US Biowarfare is my first concern, as a US citizen. And this plays too nicely into distracting us from that, for my taste.

Claire Lopez quotes another author who revealed the ‘secret speech’ of a PRC Minister of Defense in which he spoke “in terrifying terms of the need for ‘special means’—biological weapons—to ‘clean up America’ and make room for Chinese to find ‘lebensraum’ [living space]”. While I’ll refer you to Matt to debunk this article and the others on Malone’s site regarding China, the use of the term ‘lebensraum’ is strange. Why would a term attributed as the Nazis’ purported reason for conquest be used by a Chinese Minister of Defense? This brings up another potential end-game.

---

Malone has staked his reputation on the defense of Desmet’s book. As I point out, most of his lawsuit against the Breggins cites their opinions about the book as his examples of defamation. As such, it’s designed to make them unable to speak against the ideas in it without risk, if they’d listened to their lawyers. Without that lawsuit, would I have questioned Malone’s veracity? Why risk outting yourself for a theory?

Jim Reagan has written an interesting post that the purpose is to set up the dissenting for pharmaceutical intervention. I don’t discount that. Yet it seems that Desmet’s object lesson for what we’re heading towards is always Nazi Germany. Without that comparison, there isn’t any example of ‘good, civilized people’ turning into mass murderers. His theory falls apart.

Steve Kirsch is setting up a superPAC for President for someone whose uncle set up Israel. I’m not casting aspersions on RFK, but I consider his unwavering support a blind spot. Yesterday CHD published the video made by Vera Shiraz, Never Again is Now Global, Pt 1: Here We Go Again on Steroids. Her reputation is as a Holocaust survivor whose film, I assume, is going to focus on the parallels.

While we can talk about the Russians and the Chinese, and certainly the Germans, as if they’re one homogenous entity with a single will, we are not allowed to mention Israel, the Zionists, ‘the Jews’, anyone being Jewish, or the Rothschilds without being accused of being anti-Semitic. Talking about the banking system or bankers is just a sneaky way of being anti-Semitic. Is making one group off-limits from our analysis the reason that Malone would risk it all on Desmet’s theory?

---

I’ll end with a conversation I had in the comments of Jessica Rose’s Unacceptable Jessica on her episode In the War Game of Life, Don’t Fall for the Snakes: Choose a Ladder! She recently appeared at the Stockholm conference with Robert Malone and there was an altercation that she doesn’t describe but I’m guessing it might have involved him. Her message, if I understand it, was that we need to unite and not let ourselves be divided and conquered. I love Jessica and feel that she always has integrity. I posted:

Beautifully written, Jessica. Your sincerity comes through, as it did in your interview with Matt Ehret. Yet I question whether unity is a wise strategy, and that's something I say with love for all players, for whom I have no anger. It's important to know what's really happening and why.

Both you and Sasha have pointed out that the Project Veritas video was scientifically unbelievable—that's not how gain of function is done, throwing some infected monkeys together and seeing what happens. To anyone with a shred of logic, much more knowledge of the process, that would be obvious. When I saw the second video of the confrontation, it was such an obviously staged event in which PV was another player. I could go into detail but you've seen it for yourself, yes?

Watching Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch and Tucker Carlson publicize it as a real leak took away any shred of doubt that they're in on it. The only question left is what "it" is. What's their strategy?

I don't know the clip you're talking about but it's the larger point that continues to bother me. Will there come a point when you either need to go along with something you don't agree with, or admit that those who've promoted your work were on the other side—thereby discrediting yourself with them. That's the trap I see looming in the distance. FWIW.

A commenter called PP recommended that I watch Bret Weinstein and Heather Heysing discuss the PV video. Although they find the science nonsense, they float a theory that omicron might have been a virus created by Pfizer in this way, through serial passage in monkeys, that then escaped and essentially vaccinated the world. Really? They then state that they questioned the authenticity of the speaker but when they saw the second part, they knew it was real. They caution other scientists not to let their enthusiasm carry them away and connect dots that aren’t there.

For Bret, the anti-woke agenda isn’t neutral of course. He lost his university job over an altercation with a ‘woke’ student crowd, over which he sued and, I believe, got a substantial settlement. Is he thereby deluded or complicit? His ‘caution’ provides cover for Malone at a time when scientists on our side are calling bullshit on the video. As the person who first introduced Malone and Kirsch to the public, Weinstein is now on my watch list.

---

But to show I didn’t always think that way, here’s one of the first videos I did: The Demonization and Demonetization of Disinformation on Bret Weinstein:

Thinking of disinformation as short for dissenting information, I delve into the meaning of the word radical, the origin of demons, the fallacies of rhetoric, the rules for critical thinking, and the question of ultimate reality. I ask whether our minds exist in the world or the world exists in our mind, and how meditation is a connection the empire can't take away.

And The Crisis of Meaninglessness on Bret Weinstein and Heather Heysing:

In Russell Brand's interview, I agree with Bret and Heather that we're in a crisis of meaninglessness but challenge that it's an unintentional byproduct of capitalism. I look at religions, money and evolution as all myths of superiority. I quote David Graeber's work on the simultaneous emergence of coinage and religions of altruism, and cite Gandhi and A Course in Miracles on truth and reality. But in the end, I completely agree with Bret and Heather's destination, to a future that works for all of us, no matter how different our journeys to get there.