Small correction on your reference to my post. Desmet's book justifies not only psychological handling of dissenters, but everyone, in order to prevent the anxiety and confusion that are, in his view, necessary precursors to totalitarianism. But yes, dissenters could very well be singled out for special treatment.
I'm not saying that this is what Desmet intended, but I am saying that in a future perhaps 10 or 20 years from now (or sooner?) his theory for how totalitarianism arises could be trotted out to justify society-wide psychological measures to "prevent totalitarianism" (such as tailored psychiatric drugs or a "soma.") This is because for Desmet totalitarianism doesn't arise from censorship/propaganda but from society's anxiety and fear and confusion (derived from our supposed addiction to mechanistic thinking) which then lead to censorship/propaganda.
This isn't true at all. Censorship and propaganda can be imposed on a perfectly "normal" society to then create fear and anxiety. I think we've seen this somewhere ....
I operate from the principle that freedom requires vigilance, and vigilance requires imagining possible futures. Thus I imagine what the consequences of Desmet's theory might be. The Breggins noticed the same thing.
Desmet definitely believes conspiracy thinkers are dangerous as their anxiety may lead to mass formation. So all of us who believe in a vast conspiracy are dangerous.
Many people are confused about Desmet and believe that he's found the key to mass formation during Covid. What they miss is causation: what does Desmet say causes mass formation and thus totalitarianism? It's us!! It's our propensity for mechanistic thinking. It is not induced from outside by those who orchestrate.
I can't tell you how enlightening your perspectives are about all this. Unfortunately, so many of those we were hoping were working in our best interests, appear to not be. Questions are: Are they witting or unwilling players? If they really are "in on it," who got to them and what was their price for complicity?
In the end, none of that really matters. The games are afoot, and we either will be alert and do our own research, or we will be swept along with the herd.
A bad one at that, his intro story is dumb. Get the jab for long COVID?
Any vaccinologist who isn't a tool would know that is asking for more issues, you don't vaccinate the ones who got it! Malone flip flops and plays serious.
Originally Recommending the shot for up to third trimester and the older with immune conditions is not a mistake. He fkin knows that vaccines aren't tested on those groups, so how the heck can he say they're safe?!? Ugh and people excused him, cause they're like Weinstein, too dumb to see the contradictions and instead go by what they assume he is: a good guy from the bad side?! Who's next, Fauci? Seriously Malone injured many with his vaccine testing... Probably a part of the crap that was blamed on zika in Brazil.
He's always creeped me out by the way he speaks. No, not because he's wealthy and a snob... It's because he has a very calculated way of speaking and has a really creepy stare like he's pretending to be blind. Cold dead eyes.
Bret Weinstein is like a child. It must be true because woke people annoy him?
He is the definition of privelaged that he projects onto them.
These days, I really don't give a crap about these "celebs". They still believe in nonsense overall. I haven't seen many of them call out that vaccines in general, not just COVID, are really idiotic.
Adjuvants that contain toxic substances as aluminum, mercury, and other chemicals are NEVER HELPFUL.
It's about time we have a paradigm change in medicine, because the current crop are brainwashed too far to consider basic facts about toxins to think it's a good idea to inject them directly in your body.
They're also pretty moronic in focusing on spike protein as the cause of issues from the jabs.
Even Latypova points out that the elephant in the room are the lipids, which have been shown to be toxic even before COVID shots were developed.
But who cares what these obsolete indoctrinated allopathic medical scientists think.
It's all about unity, right?
No wonder why they push away the terrain theory people... For unity.
Unity is not going to change shit, just reinforce group think.
Some good news from winter oak:
"Worrying developments” that are “eroding the resilience and stability of the global system” are highlighted in the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2023. Among the threats to the system and its “economic productivity” the WEF lists “mounting citizen frustration” which it warns could lead to “secession and anarchism”. Fingers crossed! "
I lost trust in project veritas totally, not that I ever really enjoyed their product, when they caught the cnn technical director on undercover camera talking about CNN using Covid to scare and attract viewers and how climate change was the next scare tactic.
I used to be a technical director at cnn as it happens, decades ago. So I know the technical director has no say over content. The TD simply pushes buttons to put the video and video effects on the air. ‘Take camera one! Roll tape.’ And so on. So to act like he was the executive news producer and deciding content was very misleading to say the least.
I felt like the Pfizer actor was so over the top it was insane. During the ‘date,’ and esp after.
His reaction was like the tantrum of a two year old. Just uncomfortable to watch. Almost slapstick.
I agree with you on Malone. And Kirsch. Kirsch, for one thing, refuses to debate people who don’t believe in viruses, while at the same time proclaiming no one will debate him. Malone took his substack behind a paywall for comments and suddenly his comment section became so fawning I wanted to gag. Doesn’t he still own a vaccine factory? Isn’t it in his financial interest to get people worried about bad actors concocting dangerous viruses and thus creating the need for ‘safe’ vaccines.
I feel like Steve Bannon bangs the anti-China drum all the time as well. I can’t take Bannon seriously because he openly makes statements that indicate he either believes 9-11 was what we were told or he wants us to continue believing it.
You are so right on the entire Germany WWII (and prolly even WWI) issue and you are the first I have heard liken Germany to Ukraine. What an interesting concept! Plenty to think about. Keep up the good work.
I couldn’t help but think you must be somewhere warmer than where I am! We are in sweaters indoors.
Very provocative and stimulating. I share your overall concerns on just about all the issues raised, and about many of the individuals. One specific disagreement: "Steve Kirsch is setting up a superPAC for President for someone whose uncle set up Israel." Not only is this factually untrue, Truman officially "set up" Israel (possibly under pressure from the same shadowy establishment that probably helped ASSASSINATE JFK), but the roots go back way before that, including Churchill, Balfour, etc. prior to 1920. But the myth/lie about JFK as a great friend has been promulgated endlessly. Here's a tip of a very deep iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgbFeLTY7pU
You can really take off from that starting point. But, as stated, your overall themes are compelling. Personally, I've been skeptical of Kirsch all along and more and more concerning Malone, especially after the seemingly sadistic (in $$$$) lawsuit against the Breggins.
I have stopped reading Malone's stuff, so I didn't see his validation of the bad acting job from the Pfizer contractor guy. It was awful acting. Reminds me of WWF wrestling. Anyway good to know Malone and Desmet are on the bad guys list for sure. Thanks for helping to sort this out. Its always good to presume innocent until the facts present otherwise. I was intrigued by who the super pac is for. I have so many books to read thanks to your and Matt Ehret's recommendations I have to be very choosy on who I devote current event time to, so thank you again for your logical analysis of the facts.
Tereza- Excellent write-up, as usual. I know I'm months behind--there's just a lot to catch up on.
First, do you have any idea where I could find this video: JJ Couey’s Gigaohm Biological in a reaction video called Study Hall: Carlson & Malone Discuss Scooby Doo--I clicked on the link, but the video is not there.
Second, I thought you might be interested in this from J.J. Couey, ("unmasking the experts") where shares thoughts and insights on the Brett Weinstein, Malone and Kirsch video:
DARKHORSE Forgotten Friday -- Gigaohm Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Stream ("unmasking experts")
I never watched this when it first came out because I was already suspicious of all of them. Anyway, J.J. Couey notices right away that they reassured the sheep that they too could meet and have close conversations while unmasked if they were vaxxed or taking Ivermectin (nice way of reinforcing the narrative!!!) And J.J. also noted how interesting it was that there was NO mention of the scientifically fraudulent PCR test, which was creating bogus case counts and bogus death counts. No talk of Vitamin D or zinc (so again, keeping within the pharma controlled narrative).
And Sage Hana has a short video clip and notes in the comments here:
There's also an earlier Saga Hana post on Malone that seems to pick up on some discrepancies/lies from Malone on the timeline of his alleged injections.
Third, on this:
"Last, a question: with Malone and Kennedy, who controls who? Is Steve Kirsch’s superPAC for Kennedy’s run for President a way of keeping him on a leash?"
I think that's very interesting and I've been wondering the same thing. Diana West has a good post on Malone (I think you read it "Malone- A risk analysis") where at some point she talks about how TPTB infiltrate truther movements and sabotage them from within and she asks if that is in fact what we are watching. And IMO, that's a definite YES. I've noticed that there's no longer any talk about the fraudulent PCR test, which drove the whole psyop, with bogus case and death counts. And now many in the so-called medical freedom movement seem to be pushing the establishment line about the gain of function and lab leak nonsense, which seem like they could both be used to get us into war with China.
And finally, on these points:
"Malone has to go to his next interview with Tucker Carlson. There he talks about how this Pfizer exec has no morals and this is the kind of person in high level positions responding to a virus that has killed millions. Not remdesevir. Not ventilators and lack of early treatment. Not lockdowns. The Virus."
"we know beyond a doubt that it’s all staged and PV is in on it, along with Malone. For Kirsch and Tucker, they’re either gullible or part of the con, you choose."
Yes, again more evidence that Malone is part of a deep state operation to infiltrate the medical freedom movement and steer the narrative--seems like this PV episode and Malone promoting the talking points (not remedesivir, not ventilators, not lockdown, not the bogus PCR test that drove the psyop---its all about the "deadly virus" and the gain of function nonsense). I think Tucker and Kirsch are all part of the con. Tucker is presented as the "truth-teller" because in contrast to the rest of the media whores, he does let some truth out, but on covid, he's been pushing the deadly virus, gain of function, lab leak non-sense. And it's just obvious that Malone is a deep state plant--he gets all the media attention (no media attention for Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Andy Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan who question the official narrative) and Malone has brought key segments of the medical freedom movement back in line with the establishment narrative. Mission accomplished!
Thank you for this thought-provoking essay and video.
I'm not sure what to think any more about all the infighting, especially when I find myself appreciating both sides of a debate (e.g., Desmet vs. C.J. Hopkins). Sometimes it just seems like another instance of People's Front of Judea vs. Judean People's Front:
All of our sources for good information are flawed. When I encounter what seems to me must be funded demonization of China (from Bannon, Malone, Carson, etc.) I register it clearly in my mind and discount the discussions by them that would most be influenced by that. Even though I have to digest them more carefully in the future, I appreciate good analysis (as I judge it) that they bring to the table.
I recently encountered your offerings and suspected I had found a very efficient way to keep in touch with a wide spectrum of the voices I have found to offer nutritious information, filtered through your passionately held, thoughtful views of what we need to do to navigate towards a better future.
Regarding the 2nd PV video, you "know beyond a doubt that it’s all staged and PV is in on it". Consequently you know without "any shred of doubt" that Steve Kirsch is in on it. I watched the video and found it credible. A foolish, horny guy has realized his life will never be the same, and he is handling it badly.
I have followed, relied on, and gotten great info from Steve Kirsch for a long time. Throwing him overboard (judging him to be a deceptive manipulator) based on your certainty about the interpretation of that scene strikes me as an misguided, bad judgement. I guess I now have to temper my confidence in your judgement and take in your interpretations of ongoing events with a much more sceptical eye. So it goes!
Dear Tereza - can you explain this sentence. I can't follow your meaning. Does "set up" mean for a good situation or for a bad situation? Do you think JFK supported Israel or his challenge of Israel's acquisition of nuclear weapons got him killed? Or something else.
"Steve Kirsch is setting up a superPAC for President for someone whose uncle set up Israel. I’m not casting aspersions on RFK, but I consider his unwavering support a blind spot. "
Great questions! Your analysis arms us with eyes to watch out for the manipulative theatre scripted to keep us from focusing on the real victimizer "masterminds" behind the scenes. More and more, we notice the skits, we notice the actors, we notice the motives, and some dare go so far as to name suspects who we've been trained to think are off-limits.
God bless you, Tereza!
P.S. I smiled when you said: "Another person who has to be on my watch-list."
Brilliant. My thoughts exactly on everything. I was very disappointed to be the heterodox thinker amongst many of the skeptical regarding the Pfizer/PV BS. I didn't believe a word of it the moment I saw it.
Malone's "they always bury bad news on a Friday" was ridiculous. Yes, you bury bad news on a Friday. You don't issue a rebuttal on a Friday if you think that you are doing damage limitations, you make that front and centre on Monday morning. Especially if you are Pfizer and own the media (together with your buddies at Vanguard and Blackrock, of course).
The "rebuttal" was aimed firmly at US, the skeptics.
I'm thinking they are actually going to go for the "Vaccine Rug Pull". God only knows what societal chaos that will cause if they do BUT the bottom line is, the Pharma companies are getting the blame for all this, whilst the real perpetrators set up for the next one. And yes, that includes Western militaries and Five Eyes.
Not an accidental 'mea culpa' disclosure but a viciously cynical, orchestrated maneuver aimed at perpetuating the weaponized fear porn of the vrilogy pseudoscience imagery of spikes & needles voodoo.
.
"The Pfizer exec who confessed to Project Veritas now tells me the whole truth"
Small correction on your reference to my post. Desmet's book justifies not only psychological handling of dissenters, but everyone, in order to prevent the anxiety and confusion that are, in his view, necessary precursors to totalitarianism. But yes, dissenters could very well be singled out for special treatment.
I'm not saying that this is what Desmet intended, but I am saying that in a future perhaps 10 or 20 years from now (or sooner?) his theory for how totalitarianism arises could be trotted out to justify society-wide psychological measures to "prevent totalitarianism" (such as tailored psychiatric drugs or a "soma.") This is because for Desmet totalitarianism doesn't arise from censorship/propaganda but from society's anxiety and fear and confusion (derived from our supposed addiction to mechanistic thinking) which then lead to censorship/propaganda.
This isn't true at all. Censorship and propaganda can be imposed on a perfectly "normal" society to then create fear and anxiety. I think we've seen this somewhere ....
I operate from the principle that freedom requires vigilance, and vigilance requires imagining possible futures. Thus I imagine what the consequences of Desmet's theory might be. The Breggins noticed the same thing.
Desmet definitely believes conspiracy thinkers are dangerous as their anxiety may lead to mass formation. So all of us who believe in a vast conspiracy are dangerous.
Many people are confused about Desmet and believe that he's found the key to mass formation during Covid. What they miss is causation: what does Desmet say causes mass formation and thus totalitarianism? It's us!! It's our propensity for mechanistic thinking. It is not induced from outside by those who orchestrate.
It really is an insidious work.
I can't tell you how enlightening your perspectives are about all this. Unfortunately, so many of those we were hoping were working in our best interests, appear to not be. Questions are: Are they witting or unwilling players? If they really are "in on it," who got to them and what was their price for complicity?
In the end, none of that really matters. The games are afoot, and we either will be alert and do our own research, or we will be swept along with the herd.
https://williamhunterduncan.substack.com/p/there-was-no-covid-19-pandemic
I tried to summarize JJ Couey's work, Sasha Latypova's work and Katherine Watt's work.
I used to think Malone is a good man, but I am no longer clear about that.
Matt Ehret lost my focus when he defended the lockdowns in China... Cause China good guy.
He played ignorant about the COVID and vaccine situation in Russia too.
A fan boy, but some think he is a tool: https://nevermoremedia.substack.com/p/patriots-or-traitors-a-critical-look
Always thought Malone was a limited hangout.
A bad one at that, his intro story is dumb. Get the jab for long COVID?
Any vaccinologist who isn't a tool would know that is asking for more issues, you don't vaccinate the ones who got it! Malone flip flops and plays serious.
Originally Recommending the shot for up to third trimester and the older with immune conditions is not a mistake. He fkin knows that vaccines aren't tested on those groups, so how the heck can he say they're safe?!? Ugh and people excused him, cause they're like Weinstein, too dumb to see the contradictions and instead go by what they assume he is: a good guy from the bad side?! Who's next, Fauci? Seriously Malone injured many with his vaccine testing... Probably a part of the crap that was blamed on zika in Brazil.
He's always creeped me out by the way he speaks. No, not because he's wealthy and a snob... It's because he has a very calculated way of speaking and has a really creepy stare like he's pretending to be blind. Cold dead eyes.
Bret Weinstein is like a child. It must be true because woke people annoy him?
He is the definition of privelaged that he projects onto them.
These days, I really don't give a crap about these "celebs". They still believe in nonsense overall. I haven't seen many of them call out that vaccines in general, not just COVID, are really idiotic.
Adjuvants that contain toxic substances as aluminum, mercury, and other chemicals are NEVER HELPFUL.
It's about time we have a paradigm change in medicine, because the current crop are brainwashed too far to consider basic facts about toxins to think it's a good idea to inject them directly in your body.
They're also pretty moronic in focusing on spike protein as the cause of issues from the jabs.
Even Latypova points out that the elephant in the room are the lipids, which have been shown to be toxic even before COVID shots were developed.
But who cares what these obsolete indoctrinated allopathic medical scientists think.
It's all about unity, right?
No wonder why they push away the terrain theory people... For unity.
Unity is not going to change shit, just reinforce group think.
Some good news from winter oak:
"Worrying developments” that are “eroding the resilience and stability of the global system” are highlighted in the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2023. Among the threats to the system and its “economic productivity” the WEF lists “mounting citizen frustration” which it warns could lead to “secession and anarchism”. Fingers crossed! "
I will take a look at everything you have done.
I lost trust in project veritas totally, not that I ever really enjoyed their product, when they caught the cnn technical director on undercover camera talking about CNN using Covid to scare and attract viewers and how climate change was the next scare tactic.
I used to be a technical director at cnn as it happens, decades ago. So I know the technical director has no say over content. The TD simply pushes buttons to put the video and video effects on the air. ‘Take camera one! Roll tape.’ And so on. So to act like he was the executive news producer and deciding content was very misleading to say the least.
I felt like the Pfizer actor was so over the top it was insane. During the ‘date,’ and esp after.
His reaction was like the tantrum of a two year old. Just uncomfortable to watch. Almost slapstick.
I agree with you on Malone. And Kirsch. Kirsch, for one thing, refuses to debate people who don’t believe in viruses, while at the same time proclaiming no one will debate him. Malone took his substack behind a paywall for comments and suddenly his comment section became so fawning I wanted to gag. Doesn’t he still own a vaccine factory? Isn’t it in his financial interest to get people worried about bad actors concocting dangerous viruses and thus creating the need for ‘safe’ vaccines.
I feel like Steve Bannon bangs the anti-China drum all the time as well. I can’t take Bannon seriously because he openly makes statements that indicate he either believes 9-11 was what we were told or he wants us to continue believing it.
You are so right on the entire Germany WWII (and prolly even WWI) issue and you are the first I have heard liken Germany to Ukraine. What an interesting concept! Plenty to think about. Keep up the good work.
I couldn’t help but think you must be somewhere warmer than where I am! We are in sweaters indoors.
Very provocative and stimulating. I share your overall concerns on just about all the issues raised, and about many of the individuals. One specific disagreement: "Steve Kirsch is setting up a superPAC for President for someone whose uncle set up Israel." Not only is this factually untrue, Truman officially "set up" Israel (possibly under pressure from the same shadowy establishment that probably helped ASSASSINATE JFK), but the roots go back way before that, including Churchill, Balfour, etc. prior to 1920. But the myth/lie about JFK as a great friend has been promulgated endlessly. Here's a tip of a very deep iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgbFeLTY7pU
You can really take off from that starting point. But, as stated, your overall themes are compelling. Personally, I've been skeptical of Kirsch all along and more and more concerning Malone, especially after the seemingly sadistic (in $$$$) lawsuit against the Breggins.
I have stopped reading Malone's stuff, so I didn't see his validation of the bad acting job from the Pfizer contractor guy. It was awful acting. Reminds me of WWF wrestling. Anyway good to know Malone and Desmet are on the bad guys list for sure. Thanks for helping to sort this out. Its always good to presume innocent until the facts present otherwise. I was intrigued by who the super pac is for. I have so many books to read thanks to your and Matt Ehret's recommendations I have to be very choosy on who I devote current event time to, so thank you again for your logical analysis of the facts.
Tereza- Excellent write-up, as usual. I know I'm months behind--there's just a lot to catch up on.
First, do you have any idea where I could find this video: JJ Couey’s Gigaohm Biological in a reaction video called Study Hall: Carlson & Malone Discuss Scooby Doo--I clicked on the link, but the video is not there.
Second, I thought you might be interested in this from J.J. Couey, ("unmasking the experts") where shares thoughts and insights on the Brett Weinstein, Malone and Kirsch video:
DARKHORSE Forgotten Friday -- Gigaohm Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Stream ("unmasking experts")
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1793431470
I never watched this when it first came out because I was already suspicious of all of them. Anyway, J.J. Couey notices right away that they reassured the sheep that they too could meet and have close conversations while unmasked if they were vaxxed or taking Ivermectin (nice way of reinforcing the narrative!!!) And J.J. also noted how interesting it was that there was NO mention of the scientifically fraudulent PCR test, which was creating bogus case counts and bogus death counts. No talk of Vitamin D or zinc (so again, keeping within the pharma controlled narrative).
And Sage Hana has a short video clip and notes in the comments here:
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/experts-agree-clf-is-treatable
There's also an earlier Saga Hana post on Malone that seems to pick up on some discrepancies/lies from Malone on the timeline of his alleged injections.
Third, on this:
"Last, a question: with Malone and Kennedy, who controls who? Is Steve Kirsch’s superPAC for Kennedy’s run for President a way of keeping him on a leash?"
I think that's very interesting and I've been wondering the same thing. Diana West has a good post on Malone (I think you read it "Malone- A risk analysis") where at some point she talks about how TPTB infiltrate truther movements and sabotage them from within and she asks if that is in fact what we are watching. And IMO, that's a definite YES. I've noticed that there's no longer any talk about the fraudulent PCR test, which drove the whole psyop, with bogus case and death counts. And now many in the so-called medical freedom movement seem to be pushing the establishment line about the gain of function and lab leak nonsense, which seem like they could both be used to get us into war with China.
And finally, on these points:
"Malone has to go to his next interview with Tucker Carlson. There he talks about how this Pfizer exec has no morals and this is the kind of person in high level positions responding to a virus that has killed millions. Not remdesevir. Not ventilators and lack of early treatment. Not lockdowns. The Virus."
"we know beyond a doubt that it’s all staged and PV is in on it, along with Malone. For Kirsch and Tucker, they’re either gullible or part of the con, you choose."
Yes, again more evidence that Malone is part of a deep state operation to infiltrate the medical freedom movement and steer the narrative--seems like this PV episode and Malone promoting the talking points (not remedesivir, not ventilators, not lockdown, not the bogus PCR test that drove the psyop---its all about the "deadly virus" and the gain of function nonsense). I think Tucker and Kirsch are all part of the con. Tucker is presented as the "truth-teller" because in contrast to the rest of the media whores, he does let some truth out, but on covid, he's been pushing the deadly virus, gain of function, lab leak non-sense. And it's just obvious that Malone is a deep state plant--he gets all the media attention (no media attention for Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Andy Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan who question the official narrative) and Malone has brought key segments of the medical freedom movement back in line with the establishment narrative. Mission accomplished!
You're on a roll!
Thank you for this thought-provoking essay and video.
I'm not sure what to think any more about all the infighting, especially when I find myself appreciating both sides of a debate (e.g., Desmet vs. C.J. Hopkins). Sometimes it just seems like another instance of People's Front of Judea vs. Judean People's Front:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0BpfwazhUA
All of our sources for good information are flawed. When I encounter what seems to me must be funded demonization of China (from Bannon, Malone, Carson, etc.) I register it clearly in my mind and discount the discussions by them that would most be influenced by that. Even though I have to digest them more carefully in the future, I appreciate good analysis (as I judge it) that they bring to the table.
I recently encountered your offerings and suspected I had found a very efficient way to keep in touch with a wide spectrum of the voices I have found to offer nutritious information, filtered through your passionately held, thoughtful views of what we need to do to navigate towards a better future.
Regarding the 2nd PV video, you "know beyond a doubt that it’s all staged and PV is in on it". Consequently you know without "any shred of doubt" that Steve Kirsch is in on it. I watched the video and found it credible. A foolish, horny guy has realized his life will never be the same, and he is handling it badly.
I have followed, relied on, and gotten great info from Steve Kirsch for a long time. Throwing him overboard (judging him to be a deceptive manipulator) based on your certainty about the interpretation of that scene strikes me as an misguided, bad judgement. I guess I now have to temper my confidence in your judgement and take in your interpretations of ongoing events with a much more sceptical eye. So it goes!
Dear Tereza - can you explain this sentence. I can't follow your meaning. Does "set up" mean for a good situation or for a bad situation? Do you think JFK supported Israel or his challenge of Israel's acquisition of nuclear weapons got him killed? Or something else.
"Steve Kirsch is setting up a superPAC for President for someone whose uncle set up Israel. I’m not casting aspersions on RFK, but I consider his unwavering support a blind spot. "
"Are you being used? Are good people being used?"
Great questions! Your analysis arms us with eyes to watch out for the manipulative theatre scripted to keep us from focusing on the real victimizer "masterminds" behind the scenes. More and more, we notice the skits, we notice the actors, we notice the motives, and some dare go so far as to name suspects who we've been trained to think are off-limits.
God bless you, Tereza!
P.S. I smiled when you said: "Another person who has to be on my watch-list."
Brilliant. My thoughts exactly on everything. I was very disappointed to be the heterodox thinker amongst many of the skeptical regarding the Pfizer/PV BS. I didn't believe a word of it the moment I saw it.
Malone's "they always bury bad news on a Friday" was ridiculous. Yes, you bury bad news on a Friday. You don't issue a rebuttal on a Friday if you think that you are doing damage limitations, you make that front and centre on Monday morning. Especially if you are Pfizer and own the media (together with your buddies at Vanguard and Blackrock, of course).
The "rebuttal" was aimed firmly at US, the skeptics.
I'm thinking they are actually going to go for the "Vaccine Rug Pull". God only knows what societal chaos that will cause if they do BUT the bottom line is, the Pharma companies are getting the blame for all this, whilst the real perpetrators set up for the next one. And yes, that includes Western militaries and Five Eyes.
you have got to be kidding me!!!!
Yep, all in on it: All Da World's A Stage
.
Not an accidental 'mea culpa' disclosure but a viciously cynical, orchestrated maneuver aimed at perpetuating the weaponized fear porn of the vrilogy pseudoscience imagery of spikes & needles voodoo.
.
"The Pfizer exec who confessed to Project Veritas now tells me the whole truth"
https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/the-pfizer-exec-who-confessed-to?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2