Who Is Robert Malone's Attorney?
defending the Breggins, Part Two
I have been thinking that Robert Malone makes an honest man of Yuval Noah Harari. Yuval tells the truth about the Great Reset agenda, and we hate him for it. Robert tells us what we want to hear, and he’s well-loved. He gives us the sense it’s going to be okay, there are smart, successful people in charge of the opposition, some in government, some in medicine, some in law. Everyone’s working together and the truth is coming out. Hooray!
On a thread of the last episode, nymusicdaily and I were discussing our mutual respect for Tessa Lena, who has been on the forefront of identifying the depopulation agenda. I wrote that it particularly confused me that she wouldn’t challenge Malone and nymd wrote that he felt, like her, that we were in an all-out war needing all hands on deck, not to turn around and shoot at our own troops. I answered:
The question is whether Robert Malone is on the enemy's side and a traitor pretending to be part of the opposition. I'm not answering that question, I'm just defining it.
If he is, and we don't ask the question out of politeness or a desire for unity, we're following a general who's been coordinating with the enemy from the beginning, who will speak for us and coordinate the terms of our surrender (apology? 'fixing' mRNA? reparations to the injured?) And you, I and Tessa agree that the medical agenda is depopulation. So we're not talking about ideological differences, we're examining the evidence to figure out whether Robert Malone is on the side of mass and indiscriminate murder. I'm not saying he is, I'm saying the question needs to be examined or we also become complicit, out of a desire not to 'offend.'
If Robert Malone stands with you, I, Tessa, RFK, Tess Lawrie and many, many others against the depopulation agenda, he should be more than eager to explain how he was fooled into participating in it for so many years, with the Merck Ebola vaccine, the e-cigarette DoD prototype, the failure of the DOMANE system to test HCQ or IVM, and his agreement not to warn about mRNA as a 'professional courtesy.' He should apologize for calling the Breggins and others who see this agenda 'kooky conspiracy theorists.'
And, one more thing, we're not turning around and firing on our own troops. Malone is 'the leading vaccine critic' to the rest of the world, not one of the troops. Questioning whether we should be his troops and get in line behind him isn't the same as firing on him.
When I look at the turning points in history, when sovereignty movements almost won, it was always a betrayal from within that brought them down. Not the known enemy. What the Malone v. Breggins lawsuit does is force us to take sides. It isn’t possible to be neutral and side with everyone. $25M is the least of what’s on the line.
The leader of the opposition party in India was just imprisoned for 2 yrs for defamation, for comparing Modi to a thief several years ago. It takes him out of Congress and out of the running. That’s what defamation suits can do. That’s what we let into the door if this suit succeeds, not against major media outlets, but against two individuals who’ve risked their lives fighting against the Pharmafia, as Mathew Crawford terms it.
In the previous episode, I examined the progression of the Breggins’ articles on the Malone/ Desmet theory of mass formation, to which Malone added psychosis. Many people I respect have felt that it’s a useful theory. I spent four years of graduate school studying a combination of social and personality psych. In my essay, Cogni-Covid Dissonance, I explained why I think a combination of behavioral psychology and cognitive dissonance fits better, showing that people change their beliefs to fit their actions—especially coerced ones with potentially disastrous consequences.
But the Breggins don’t need me to speak for them, as these perceptive and insightful analyses speak for themselves. Their first essay dealt only with a difference in ideology with Desmet. In the second, they give Malone the benefit of the doubt that he’s unaware of how Desmet’s theory attacks and undermines researchers of a globally destructive agenda. In the third, it cites Malone labeling people like them ‘black-pilled’ extremists and how it “demeans those who thoughtfully examine the roots of totalitarianism and encourages those who wish to ridicule and condemn them.”
Only by the fourth do they reach the conclusion that this isn’t a mere disagreement but intentional. They had spent three articles pointing out why Desmet and Malone’s theory was harmful to the health freedom movement, and dangerously defamatory to them by making conspiracy research both a cause and a sign of mass psychosis. At this point they posit a hypothetical scenario for what Malone’s end-game could be.
Their evidence consists of Malone’s own statements and CV. Their projection for the future is that he may become director of a federal health agency. On a Jan 2021 article called Dr. Robert Malone Suing the Washington Post?, the website We Love Trump ran a poll: Do you support Malone replacing Fauci? This isn’t something he’s denied. It can hardly be called defamation.
Here are some questions and research for the Breggins:
Who is the prosecuting attorney that Malone describes as “very experienced in defamation cases, and who represents many of the physicians involved in the medical freedom movement”? What else has he done for Malone and others?
From The Daily Beast: Inside the Anti-Vaxxer Civil War:
In response to the allegations, Malone hired Steven Biss, a popular defamation attorney for right-wing figures like former Rep. Devin Nunes. In a Sept. 26 letter to Ruby and two allied conspiracy theorists, Biss demanded retractions of claims like Ruby’s allegation that Malone’s “connections…are 100% CIA.” Biss also requested an unspecified financial payment to Malone in the letter to make up for the deep-state insinuations. If the accusations aren’t pulled back by the end of October, Biss warned in the letter, Malone will sue.
One month prior, Malone and Biss filed an identical lawsuit against the Washington Post for $50M in defamation, plus the same $350K in punitive damages plus 6% interest with jury demanded. The language is the same throughout. Biss also represented Rep Devin Nunes. From abovethelaw.com: Devin Nunes Loses Yet Again In His Quixotic, Censorial SLAPP Cases:
For a while there in 2019, it seemed like a month couldn’t go by without (then) Rep. Devin Nunes suing some critic or another (including, somewhat infamously, a satirical cow). After kicking it off by suing mocking livestock, he quickly moved on to suing news organizations. A big one was suing CNN, a favored punching bag of Republicans, which he sued in December of 2019. It didn’t go well.
The cow referred to a satirical @DevinCow account for which Nunes and Biss were suing Twitter for $250M.
What does Malone v. Breggins define as the core defamation?
[From Malone’s post Just the Facts] “The gist of the defamatory statements and implications is that Dr. Malone lacks the character and is unfit to be a medical doctor and scientist.”
As I said in Who Is Robert Malone, Really? Malone hasn’t ever been a practicing physician, to my knowledge. I think that the Breggins believe Malone to very much have the character needed to be a vaccine scientist for the NIH. He’s a perfect fit for the job. From the way that Biss has worded this, he would need to prove that the material statements quoted as defamation are implying that Malone is unfit to be a scientist, not that he’s unfit to lead the medical freedom or anti-vaccine movement.
What are the Breggins’ implied allegations? Are they valid concerns?
The Breggins imply that Malone still represents the interests of the organizations with which he’s been affiliated his entire career: the NIH, ACTIV, HHS, CDC, FDA, WHO, DoD, CIA, Big Pharma, Big Philanthropy, global vaccines/ bioweapons.
In Malone’s interview with Dr. Joseph Mercola, reprinted on Children’s Health Defense, he states:
I have historically worked with people who have been truly Deep State intelligence community. I have decades of experience in biodefense. I have been deep in the belly of the beast. I have won literally billions of dollars for my clients in grants and contracts. I have managed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and contracts in the vaccine space.
As study section chair or key study section member on many hundred-plus million-dollar contract reviews for typically the NIH [National Institutes of Health] … but also DOD [Department of Defense]. I have historically been deeply embedded in this whole enterprise. I know it upside down.
I understand this system. So, I think the concerns that I could be controlled opposition are valid. I think that it’s appropriate to acknowledge the basis for those concerns. Now, [those] concerns, I think, are refuted by my behaviors and actions.
Whether Malone thinks his actions refute those concerns is an opinion. No different than the Breggins’ opinion that they don’t. But the concern, he acknowledges, is valid.
Has Robert Malone given conflicting information about his past?
Sage Hana on the Malone clip on Joe Rogan vs. The Daily Beast.
Despite Malone’s popularity with anti-vaccine activists, he’s still managed to piss off many of the biggest anti-vax conspiracy theorists over his refusal to back their nuttiest suppositions. Two of the loudest voices in that community—right-wing shock jock Stew Peters, and pro-Trump personality Dr. Jane Ruby—have settled on the story that Malone is actually working with the CIA.
The rift appears to have started after Peters produced a supposed exposé called “Watch the Water.” Borrowing themes from Dr. Strangelove’s conspiracy-addled general, Peters’ film baselessly alleges that snake venom has somehow been planted in the nation’s water supply and within COVID-19 vaccines to inject recipients with satanic DNA.
Malone was quick to denounce the film. He said Peters’ theory lacks any scientific evidence and is flat-out wrong. Malone has even described Peters as a “conspiracy theorist”—fighting words in the anti-vax community.
And so, Peters has been punching back.
In recent weeks, the far-right radio host has begun telling a story about a time Malone supposedly made contact with ex-CIA official Michael Callahan. According to Peters, Callahan called Malone on Jan. 4, 2020—from Wuhan, China.
Callahan “warned” Malone that he "had to get [his] team spun up” to respond to the coronavirus outbreak.
“I have been sustaining just continuous attacks from the conspiracy theorists. Stew is just one of them,” he told The Daily Beast. However, when it comes to the CIA agent accusations, Malone said those statements from Peters’ are “unfounded” and “not grounded in reality.”
“I don’t think Stew would know a real CIA agent if it bit him,” he said.
While the name-calling and insults have grown more intense recently, Malone insists that Peters remains committed to “bending facts” and “distorting reality” …
Dr. Robert Malone on The Joe Rogan Experience, Dec. 31, 2021
“There is a CIA Agent that I’ve co-published with in the past named Michael Callahan. He was in Wuhan in the fourth quarter of 2019. He called me from Wuhan on January 4th (2020).
To the Daily Beast reporter, Malone says that Stew Peters’ CIA allegations are ‘unfounded’ and ‘not grounded in reality’ and that he wouldn’t ‘know a CIA agent if it bit him.’ But to Joe Rogan, he confirmed Peters’ ‘supposed’ evidence, as he also did in his interview with Aubrey Marcus.
Great thanks to Sage Hana, whose links and links-within-links I’m just following.
Does Robert Malone engage in the practices over which he’s suing?
Yesterday, Malone posted this to his Twitter account: Robert W Malone, MD 19h
If you or your organization traffic in hate and defamation, then I cannot support you, no matter how worthy your cause may be. On line hate and malicious defamation are both wrong and fundamentally evil.
If I count the insults in the media pieces quoted here, I get: “black pilled,” “anti-vax conspiracy theorists,” “nuttiest suppositions,” “conspiracy-addled,” “bending facts” and “distorting reality.” As opposed to this, I get the Breggins’ three respectful attempts to clarify why the Desmet/ Malone theory “demeans those who thoughtfully examine the roots of totalitarianism and encourages those who wish to ridicule and condemn them.”
Then, failing to get a response other than ridicule, they express what Malone once termed valid “concerns that I could be controlled opposition … I think that it’s appropriate to acknowledge the basis for those concerns.” Yet instead of acknowledging the basis of the concerns, Malone has sued the Breggins for asking the question and presenting their evidence, all of which is grounded in fact.
Yet this isn’t the only way that Malone traffics in encouraging ridicule, condemnation and hate. One of my readers pointed out his appearance with JP Sears in the Hi-Rez rap video of 2+2=5. It features a bearded man in a skirt and blue wig teaching a class of grown men. Not only does it ridicule transgenders but implies that they and anyone who defends them is responsible for the corruption and potential mutilation of children, inciting hate and possibly violence.
And I continue to believe that the Pfizer expose Malone endorsed was staged. It featured a charicature of a young gay VP of R&D calling the police because “There are too many white people, I don’t feel safe.” The implication is that the mRNA vaccine and future deadly mutations will happen because of woke hiring practices that put people into positions for which they’re dangerously unqualified.
If someone you love was killed or injured by the virus or the vaccine, don’t blame the global predators those black-pilled Breggins expose. Blame a gay, blame a black, blame a liberal. If they’re successful, blame them for stealing your job, your education. I think that woke and anti-woke are both ways we’re being played and Malone is fomenting a hate and ridicule that’s become prevalent in the audiences of the so-called freedom fighters.
I’ll end with a story of how this plays out. My daughter’s husband lost his mom two weeks after their wedding, and her memorial was this past weekend. The all-day event continued, with more drinking, into the night. A couple of male cousins, who’d clearly had too much, started railing against gays and trans, and how they were ruining the country.
Another guest was a lesbian who’d been brought into the family by the mom and accepted as a daughter. In addition to losing her spiritual mother, she was facing a double mastectomy for the same cancer that had killed her actual mom. It came close enough to a fistfight that the neighbor intervened, and only invoking the deceased and her wishes finally calmed things down. That, and the agitators passing out.
This is what mean-funny, us against them, gets us. I was once taken in by Malone quoting the Grateful Dead to ‘be kind.’ To ridicule and foment hate is not kind. To sue over valid concerns with potentially catastrophic consequences is not kind. To answer legitimate questions and evidence with insults and evasion is, not just unkind, but deceptive. Is this who we want to follow?
To follow up, here’s Wokeness vs. The Void: Kehinde Andrews & Candace Owens:
Russell Brand has a vigorous debate with Candace Owens where they jest, they joust, they hold hands and they redesign the system on a yellow pad. Russell's next interview, Kehinde Andrews, calls Candace contradictory, wrapped around a bubble, an empty void, like talking down a hole, belongs on a plantation, crazy ideas, dangerous nonsense, irrational, ridiculously delusional, and a black face on white racism. Who's right? I present their positions and solutions, and then show how we could enable Kehindeville, Russelltopia and Candaceland, along with my own system of community reciprocity.
As repercussions become more evident, denial and hostility are also on the rise. Why? I look at how belief follows behavior in what psychologists term cognitive dissonance, and how this has been used to turn us against one another. I give three personal examples of this and my failure to change anyone's mind. I look at what this means for the agendas of dispossession and depopulation, that Matt Ehret shows to be decades in the making.
George Webb is now taunting Bob repeatedly saying, roughly: "Please sue ME, Bob. I would love to have a horse farm...I'll even let you keep the prize horse..."
The irony of Malone comedically participating in contentious arenas...while suing inquiry with a suspiciously itchy trigger finger...cannot be overstated.
Excellent article, Tereza.