George Webb is now taunting Bob repeatedly saying, roughly: "Please sue ME, Bob. I would love to have a horse farm...I'll even let you keep the prize horse..."
The irony of Malone comedically participating in contentious arenas...while suing inquiry with a suspiciously itchy trigger finger...cannot be overstated.
Thank you, Sarah. Yes, I watched JP Sears some at the beginning but mean-funny humor just makes me sad. And back to my first sentences--I'd rather have an honest enemy than a false friend. At least you know where they stand.
I’m actually commenting before I read your new Substack about the Breggins. I was finishing reading what I’ve included below (in case you haven’t seen it) So hard to believe Malone is actually going through with suing them! Been wondering who’s actually financing his suit. Thanks Teresa for putting the info out there.
Read this Substack earlier and it just reinforced what I’ve already known about Malone! The implications of these bioweapons are horrific! I have several friends and family members who have cancer now after taking the shot. Malone so proudly brags he invented the mRNA technology which in seems is actually nanotechnology :
Per Dr. Malone’s 1989 clinical publication, he used Lipofectin to penetrate mammalian cells in order to have the cells of mice express the DNA from from the traditional Northeastern firefly, African clawed frog, and fruit fly.
Per ThermoFisher’s website, Lipofectin is the reagent of choice to integrate foreign DNA and RNA into endothelial cells. Endothelial cells are the cells that line our blood vessels, lymph nodes, and heart.
Lipofectin is Used to Integrate the Genetic Sequences of Aggressive Cancer into Humanized Cells
Lipofectin is also very effective at successfully integrating HeLa (the mRNA codes for the most aggressive form of cancer known to man) into human cells to produce cancer inside a mammal (human).
Per the 1996 patent that Dr. Malone is listed as an inventor of, Delivery of Exogenous DNA Sequences in a Mammal, the cationic liposome nanotechnologies can deliver payloads of non-mammal toxic peptides to human cells, such as the bioweapon ricin or cobra snake venom.
When doctors at the University of Pittsburgh tested the respiratory fluid from eight (8) patients who died from severe COVID-19 in 2020 in Lombardy, Italy, they found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contained synthetically recreated cobra venom, Krait venom, rabies virus, and HIV glycoprotein-120.
This is really fascinating, thank you for sending it Teresa. I remember seeing Malone's Nanotherapeutics on his CV but Karen really goes deep. You saw my episode on Snake Venom, yes?
Yes I did! My friend Patrick Jordan has been speaking about snake venom long before covid. He has a YouTube called vaccinefraud.com
Did you see the mention of how they used HeLa stem cells (Henrietta Lacks had the most aggressive form of cervical cancer as well as syphilis) my immediate thought is it any wonder cancer is exploding? Made a few YouTube videos since 2020 when all this started. I’ve moved most of them to Rumble so they don’t get taken down. One of them is about Henrietta, here’s a link if you’re interested https://rumble.com/v10iwba-henrietta-lacks-and-immortal-cell-lines.html
I'm going to re-post to you what I sent to Teresa re: snake venom, 8 Lombardy deaths, sci-fi reports etc.
Most people don't read reports beyond titles a bit of the abstract and conclusions.
The report you are referencing from Paul Alexander's article is complete rubbish as are most all of these reports on the alleged SARS-CoV-2.
Yet again they use computational models, simulations and structural models and invent worlds inside their little computer boxes to arrive at a set of pre-determined conclusions that distort the reality of what happened.
"Sequence similarities", "probabilities", "like-segments", "may potentially" and on and on. If they wanted to and ran a few more sequences they would find it had "similarities" to baboon fangs.
But they use lots of technical science-y sounding and specialized verbiage so the reader is placed under a spell.
It's total nonsense.
There is no such thing as "Covid-19" and no individuals in Lombardy, Italy- which I know more than a little about- did not die from "severe Covid-19" in Lomardy, Italy.
People need to desist with the fear mongering and look to what actually killed people- hint: It ain't snake venom or some microbe from outer space.
Here is what actually happened in Northern Italy in Spring 2020:
I agree that the deaths were primarily iatrogenic, but there was certainly something dispersed that gave people a unique set of symptoms. The evidence suggests there was no virus, but something surely happened.
Most people don't read reports beyond titles a bit of the abstract and conclusions.
The report you are referencing from Paul Alexander's article is complete rubbish as are most all of these reports on the alleged SARS-CoV-2.
Yet again they use computational models, simulations and structural models and invent worlds inside their little computer boxes to arrive at a set of pre-determined conclusions that distort the reality of what happened.
"Sequence similarities", "probabilities", "like-segments", "may potentially" and on and on. If they wanted to and ran a few more sequences they would find it had "similarities" to baboon fangs.
But they use lots of technical science-y sounding and specialized verbiage so the reader is placed under a spell.
It's total nonsense.
There is no such thing as "Covid-19" and no individuals in Lombardy, Italy- which I know more than a little about- did not die from "severe Covid-19" in Lomardy, Italy.
People need to desist with the fear mongering and look to what actually killed people- hint: It ain't snake venom or some microbe from outer space.
Please inform yourself as to what actually happened in Northern Italy in Spring 2020:
I'll look forward to reading that, Allen. Good to have another piece of the puzzle. Love the photo of the swaddled, masked, sunglassed peeps covering everything but their noses!
you can take the creature out of the black lagoon but you can't take the black lagoon off the creature.
as evidence of that, consider the paucity of true whistleblowers who come from the pharma side/pharmacide. mike yeadon, tess lawrie, sasha, that's about it.
the optics of the suit against the breggins are the biggest tell of all.
let's see, i want to win a libel suit, who do i go after? msnbc? alex jones?
nah. i sue an old couple who are still madly in love, who have a 60+ year track record fighting for the little guy. who have mega experience in front of a jury and would demolish any adversary at trial.
what am i going to sue them over? a theory. that's not even mine.
and who am i going to get to represent me in court? a guy who hasn't won a lawsuit in, like, ever?
this is kabuki theatre. not designed to even reach the point of discovery let alone a trial.
anybody who thinks the suit against the breggins originated with malone is niaive. he's a placeholder. the breggins are over the target and this is an attempt to shut them down, ordered and directed from many levels above malone.
Hahaha. Great analogy! And excellent point about Mike, Tess, Sasha. It's not Malone coming from this world that makes him suspect, any more than genealogy is a tell. It's the current behavior that's suspect and then the history confirms it.
I LOVE your thinking about the Breggins. I've been feeling very protective of them but you're reminding me that they've done a fine job protecting others in front of juries. They're extremely capable.
And I also felt the suit wasn't coming from Malone. I don't think Desmet's theory, as a strategy point, was his idea. I started to put into the essay that he was reminding me of Obama campaigning for his second term--half-heartedly debating, lackluster, until the handlers leaned on him to perk it up. Obama knew he was a fraud and a disappointment to his followers. He was ready to be done. I see that coming for Malone.
That was my guess when Steve Kirsch announced the SuperPAC, right when the Pfizer 'expose' came out. I've heard since that Kennedy's not jumping on the campaign trail. So maybe he has a sense it's a trap.
Well, anyone who uses 'douche-bag' not just once but 20X loses points in my book. I think it's a sexist slur. Not contradicted by Shiva's statement about women who want to "suck Kennedy off." But I did watch to the clip of Kennedy saying he's pro-vaxx and had all 6 of his kids vaccinated. I think Kathleen's point is well taken that things have changed and, along with them, maybe Kennedy's mind. No one else was even in this space of being vaccine-skeptics during the decades that he was going it alone. There are things he may not even have been able to say to himself. His book, however, is the most powerful anti-vaxx, anti-HHS/ NIH/ CDC statement I've ever read.
But I agree totally with Shiva's overall point. Any movement that's top-down is already co-opted and what they're suppressing is anything coming from the bottom-up.
Tereza I agree with you 100+ percent. Bravo on the Breggins defense you've presented. Also I will add, I am seeing the pattern of grass root start-up movements being hi-jacked and then steered by the hi-jackers into ineffective oblivion. What good is the size of a movement if it is impotent. The truth is what we should be after, no matter where the chips fall. These movements that go nowhere are probably co-opted with lots of money and promises.
Thank you, Helene. I feel that pattern's been going on for a loooong time. In my book I look at democracy doing that and diverting the rebellion of smallholders, the landless, the colonized and the women/ slaves (same diff) into a competition for smallholders to join the hierarchy.
A decade ago, I saw that bring down the pirate radio station where I used to have my show. It stopped being about broadcasting the truth, which at that time was Amy Goodman, and instead became about giving a voice to the voiceless--whether they had anything to say or not.
In this YT episode I did awhile ago, I talk about Arundhati Roy and John Cusack talking about int'l support being Gandhi-fied and NGO-ized where the right of self-defense was replaced with 'peaceful protest'--totally worthless when you're in the middle of a jungle.
So yes, it's completely their strategy, which is why the 'philanthropaths' are such an important piece.
Like the gladiators. I guess it has been going on a long time! Your book is next on my list and I'm really looking forward to it. I'm still reading Joe Atwill. It's not a super easy read at times and then other times its so obvious so... I know the bible pretty good but the roman history and the jewish history is new to me. I cant wait to read the Shakespeare one. Thank you for all the time you put into humanity.
Oh wow, reading this got me in a big loop trying to understand how they choose people for positions like Fauci.
A loop because I know the correct answer, the honest one.
But we know that will not happen with the way the system works currently.
Now I get why Malone could be tapped for that job. He's building trust among the community that poses the greatest threat to the current corrupt system.
It's admirable that they finally are addressing the concerns of this disaster.
But Malone will not work to quiet the movement. More and more people are questioning even traditional vaccines.
He's just there to appeal to the people who didn't look deep yet.
I bet if he's the NIH director, the movement will quickly see that he's just a tool.
"What the Malone v. Breggins lawsuit does is force us to take sides. It isn’t possible to be neutral and side with everyone. $25M is the least of what’s on the line."
This is an excellent insight. The person behind the division projects blame on everyone else. Withdrawing the lawsuit would go far in removing that division and healing some wounds. It appears this is not something RW is interested in.
For those of us paying attention, we have enough reason to question and doubt. RW may be presented as a 'leader' of the medical truth blah blah... but he ain't. He doesn't speak for me, anymore then the idiots in Biden Pretendency speak for me.
I don't want to stay embroiled in ops that were intentionally created to do just that - with endless pathways to follow - consume my valuable time.
I appreciate what you, Sage, JJ, Karen K, and others have brought out. The cracks are there; plenty of info to look at if you want to look. It's a service and an ongoing lesson for all of us: There is a whole world behind the curtain who's job it is, is to manage your perception. It is always ahead of us, it never sleeps and we, being normal folks, don't think like that, assume good intentions and walk into their traps, over and over. Sadly, if someone is thrust into the national stage and given a mic (over and over) and ultimately mucks and muddles the message...well, what do you think is going on? Does Tucker have Mike Yeadon on?
Anyway yours and others' work have confirmed my gut. Malone is irrelevant to me. He may well have handlers and be a prisoner to his persona and compromised via a deal we'll never be privy to. Who knows? For me, I've spent enough time on him.
Yes, agreed. Well put. It was back in Dec when I first analyzed the lawsuit that I assembled the facts to confirm my own gut feeling. And I think, except for the occasional person who wanders in, my readers have been ahead of me--much of what I present I've gotten from them. So I'm not really trying to convince anyone else.
For me, the motivation has been two-fold for the ten? articles I've now done on Malone. For the last couple, I want to use my analytical skills to be of as much service to the Breggins as possible. My hope is that they feel surrounded by a smart, perceptive, caring community who's not going to let them go this alone.
For the others, it's not so much to prove a point as it is to use Malone as a window into the 'soul' of the psyops, of the Great Reset. What's their next move? Is the US Deep State coordinated with Davos or are they rats fighting over the chicken feeder? I much prefer revealing over healing, so I'm glad that Malone is ramping up the suit rather than dropping it.
Even though my book is nominally about economics, the real topic is the 28 psyops that go back 3500 yrs that have fooled us into serving the empire when we want to take care of our families, communities, homes, people, land and even planet. I don't call them psyops but paradigms and go back to money, democracy, the Constitution, etc. Malone is part of a pattern that we could break, and will break. So maybe he'll be relevant but not in the way he wants ;-)
"My hope is that they feel surrounded by a smart, perceptive, caring community who's not going to let them go this alone." Thank you, I feel the same.
And agree also, Malone is a good for instructional purposes, so yes! relevant that way. And the patterns from those paradigms that have put a choke-hold on human freedom and our ability to thrive, is - I'm with you - breaking. Too many out there now sussing it, to go back to business (slavery under the guise of normal life) as usual.
It's easy to miss the new tracks being plowed that will lead us to a new world, when we're still dealing with the many tentacled assaults and operations. But new tracks are forming, and they will make it easier for others to jump on to, soon.
I appreciate your take on things and your tenacity, Tereza. Thank you.
I'd like to forget the Malone/Breggin dispute, which is continuing to rage on at Dr. Meryl Nass' substack, for example. But I can't. Why not? Because Malone won't let me or anyone else forget about it, by dropping that stupid lawsuit.
Malone needs to put his big-boy pants on and agree to disagree without getting into lawfare. Malone also has a huge problem with Desmet and his continued support of Desmet's psychobabble, and he won't let that go, either.
Who is dividing the medical freedom community? Not Breggin: he's just saying it as he sees it and was doing that long before Malone decided, "pharma bad." Malone is dividing the medical freedom movement, and the proof for that is that what was once a little deal (many people paid little attention to Breggin prior to the lawsuit) has been turned into a huge deal that just won't die down. Happy, then, Dr. Malone?
A word about Dr. Nass, whom I admire. She recently admitted she never read Desmet's book. To me that goes a long way toward explaining why she still stands behind Malone.
I don't think Malone is a bad person. But, by their deeds ye shall know them, and Malone's deeds show him to be a vindictive and stubborn man who cares more about his sacred "integrity" than he does about the bigger battle. He is dividing the movement; not Breggin, Malone.
I continue to cite your excellent work refuting Desmet, Jim. I think you're as tired of that topic as maybe I am of Malone. Have you read the Breggins articles on it, before or after you wrote yours? They're also beautifully perceptive, logical and deeply informed. I think you would feel in good company.
And I'm personally glad for the lawsuit. I would never have looked at Malone so closely and would never have questioned him until it was too late, and we'd been led off a cliff. But I agree with your point. I've often been accused, in other instances, of creating conflict and one of my mantras is that conflict can't be created. It can just be brought to the surface where people have to deal with it, but it was there to begin with. That's what we're doing with Malone, bringing to the surface how his words and actions are in conflict, but we didn't create that conflict.
As usual, I can't give it the follow up it deserves, but found a few points to comment on.
It took me a couple of months of on-again, off-again reading to finish Lobaczewski's "Political Ponerology: The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of the Totalitarian State" ... and though I don't believe for a minute that a 'science of evil' will save us from ourselves any more than an 'evolutionary biology of deception' will ... I think he does shed more light than Desmet on the moral culpability of the few, those who are predisposed to have contempt for others, or worse ... dehumanize them, and step over a moral line.
Although I haven't crafted a prompt that takes a more critical approach to assumptions, reasoning, and salience/validity of data ... Chat GPT does a pretty good job of summarizing the main points of the book, and in less than a minute.
A more overtly literary metaphor has recently come to my attention through a podcast by Liv Boeree ... "Moloch" as a metaphor for competition pushed to such sociopathic extremes, the end game is either dystopia or extinction.
I think it has a weak point in focusing the evil away from the lack of moral responsibility by specific individuals and blaming the system ... a bit like Desmet's theory of Mass Formation Psychosis. But that also brings us back to a point of difference between our understanding of human nature.
I think the problem of scale necessitates systems, ideologies, or a shared mythos as a proxy for the immediate and uniquely individual empathy between members of a small community ... that Dunbar's number thingy. I remember you once writing that 'spheres of influence' can involve millions ... but that is where the strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (linguistic relativity) comes in ... an ad-hoc herding of the social primate through logic and language as proxies for individually specific empathy.
I guess as good an example as Pol Pot would be Led Zepplin performing live. What one achieved through orders and fear, the other did through pleasure and passion — a mass formation of shared values, emotions, and reason ... even if the time-scale persistence of the effect was vastly different ... and the carefully crafted illusion that 'Pol Pot is singing to you, as an individual'. 😅 Beatlemania, history as taught in public education, MSM, all carefully crafted illusions appealing to our deepest, most personal sense of identity ... and actually creating our identities ... but only if they catch us during the early stages of the maturation process ... or at an arrested stage of development. Large scale depends on perpetuating a sense of dependency on those at the tops of the hierarchies, hence the deep connections between a world culture (yes, here in Japan too) obsessed with youth, competitiveness, and success at scale (submitting that 5 year business plan in order to gather investment).
Playing a riff off that music metaphor ... although I've been to my share of large scale jazz events, I never really got into the theater of it all, preferring the intimacy of a cellar dive with maybe a dozen others, the audience determining the nuances of the performance as much as the performers eliciting a reaction from the audience. It is not so much the genre, but the authenticity of the musical communication I appreciate. Would feel just at home back in rural North Carolina listening in on a couple of back-porch, old-timers trading licks, of call-and-response with 'Appalachian' music or blues.
Two musical YouTubers I follow, Rich Beato and Adam Neely had a recent discussion, which was otherwise good, but then the question of whether they, themselves, would be musically relevant 80 years from now came up. I immediately felt a bit of Molochian discomfort with even considering that question. IF they were authentic, and in the moment, 80 years relevance might be an emergent property arising from their authenticity. But I guess it would be tough to set up the cameras, lights, videos, timing, etc. and still keep the illusion of spontaneous authenticity.
It felt like a 'tail wagging the dog' kind of moment, a bit like the Japanese high school kid who proudly said her ambition was to win a Nobel Prize ... when just a few years earlier, an actual Nobel Prize winner from Japan said the prize was not a goal. It was post-hoc recognition for someone who had spent their life in the moment, pursuing a passion in science, and with positive effects on society. At least I can go with his ideal, not the kid's.
Again, extending that music as metaphor thingy ... it seems like the technological 'progress' in music since the industrial era (analog recording, electronics, and now digital A.I.) ... is a process of contriving and scaling up to mass production-consumption of authentic spontaneity. I imagine even tribal war dances or spring festivals had unpredictable nuances to the music and movement ... which finely tuned digitalization is trying to capture, for mass consumption.
In the history of jazz and other popular music, there has been on-again, off-again controversy between the musicians about the authenticity of committing a performance to vinyl, then tape, then CD, and now digital audio. A lot of people do not realize that improvisation was a big part of the show of pre-orchestral classic musicians such as Mozart, and have reduced classic music to a formula as readily as metaphors become part of prose ... now closer to a marker of economic class division than of musical prowess.
I guess we, the informed consumer, have our own drawn lines beyond which 'contrived spontaneity' should not cross. Milli Vanilli was one of the more famous faux-pas in that social construct that seems quaint by today's standards of mixing samples from memorable past recordings with 'new' pieces. And some of us recognize modern 'capitalism' or 'democracy' as a kabuki show ... that 'we know they're lying, they know we know, and we know they know we know' thingy.
Lobaczewski talks a bit about how emotions (including the Japanese obsession with ambition) are transferred to and between large populations, usually at the subliminal level (I think he calls it 'transference') but as we are now seeing through the government nudge units that Laura Dodsworth wrote about, it can be overtly consciously manipulated behaviorist psychology.
Lobaczewski doesn't go into detail about how people who are individually acquainted can use language and logic (art forms included) to effect mass movements. I guess an analysis of that process is a necessarily never-ending, multi-disciplinary 'science' (or art) beyond the scope of any single book. And I guess you are one in as a good a position to take that broad view as any. 4 years in social-psychology grad school is a lot of reading, listening, and sharing of ideas.
As for Malone ... largely thanks to you, I see him as a not-so-benign player. The moral flip-side of a renaissance man. Alas one of the unfortunate weaknesses of our species is that the most sociopathic individuals appear to be also the most cunning predators among us.
The 'contrived spontaneity' that many struggling-to-pay-the-rent artists aspire, may contain some effective altruists, or people like Joni Mitchell who consciously used music as self therapy, and a wide range of others along a moral spectrum.
But those who 'spontaneously contrive' are a different animal. The kind that Lobaczewski talks about ... the trauma-driven narcissists and opportunists, or born to the bone psychopaths that make up a small minority of any population.
I suspect Malone is among that minority, and I don't really have an answer of how to deal with such types. I have not been very successful in Japan. Gaslighting has long been accepted as a management technique over here, and as a permanent foreigner, I don't really have a defense against that in the work-place. If I did not have a small, empathy-driven community of Japanese friends, I would have offed myself long ago.
I wish had more time to keep up with the dots you are connecting.
Thank you for taking the time to share your in-depth thoughts with me, Steve. I'm really glad you brought up Lobaczewski. One of the 'tonic masculinity bros,' Harrison Koehli, has been doing a series on the book on his stack, Political Ponerology. I think it's actually the same mechanism as Desmet's with a different application. Desmet blames the masses, L blames the 'bad to the bone' evil psychopaths. Neither blames the system. Maybe the Moloch meme does, I'll check that out.
With the decentralized economic system I describe in my book, it allows culture and community to be formed at that Dunbar's number while fostering an exchange of cultures between. You, of all people, would thrive in my economy Steve. You're the perfect example of 'no good deed goes unpunished' in the current system. But one that fostered reciprocity and giving is exactly up your alley.
I remember cellar venues! Wine houses with barrels for tables and stools, with candles that had dripped down over bottles. O for real candles! That was when we knew how to live dangerously.
I'm predicting a resurgence of live local music, maybe poetry readings. Once the 5G rollout magnetizes all the nano particles in our blood, we'll have to shut down the whole wifi system, have occasional visits to wired hubs just for research or to get our mail. Gallows humor ... maybe.
Just waking up from a fitful sleep. A few summer days have arrived early in Tokyo, before a weekend chill hits back again.
Good summary-comparison you made there between Desmet, Lobaczewski, and the Molloch meme. One big fear I have is that metaphors are sometimes taken out of context and there will be some who take Molloch for more than a metaphor ... a bit like the flip side of fundamentalist religion. We will just have to see where some influencers run with that.
Thank YOU, for the feedback. I have GOT to read your book, but on that long flight back to Japan, I cracked open Isobel Wilkerson's "Caste" ... a well written, but grim read about one aspect of human nature. Will keep in touch and get to your book soon. Now still processing my mother's rapid deterioration, as well as my own mortality.
I'm glad that you're not tired of hearing about the same topic. I keep wanting to get to other things but this pulls me back. There are so many elements and my admiration for the Breggins keeps growing.
I guess I must have just subscribed to her--this is the first time I've read anything from her, and her post was very ambiguous. I was about to drop a link to my favorite post from Diana West on Robert Malone (https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/4421/Dr-Robert-Malone-A-Risk-Analysis.aspx) and then I read your post about how she defends him!?!?! OMG!! Maybe I'll drop the link anyway. (I did, so I'll see what happens)
Thanks for that support! I love Tessa and I'm hoping that this is a post that she's changing her mind but maybe not, it's hard to tell. In this one, I quote extensively from that excellent Diana West article, but it's always good to draw more attention to it: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-the-breggins-part-one
I truly know nothing about Tessa--I've never read anything at her substack before, so I just assumed it was a warning about Robert Malone!! Lol, then I read further and saw your comment. Hopefully people will start to wake up. We really don't have time for the infighting when it seems like they are moving forward with CBDCs at an accelerated pace.
Here's something interesting. I'm just listening to Peter Breggin on his show when I learn that Simone Gold referred this author Mark Mcdonald to Mathias Desmets new book on mass formation psychosis
Teo, I've had your Substack bookmarked to thank you for recommending my book. That's so kind of you!
This is very interesting. I listened to the first, that you conveniently set at the pertinent info. That's a whole new wrinkle that RM may have stolen this phrase from McDonald and made it mean something completely different. I did an early video, pre-Substack, that talked some about The United States of Fear: https://youtu.be/ifRlBglQvXA.
It seems true to his m.o. to use what others are saying, and twist it to mean the opposite.
I too have enjoyed JP Sears videos in the past, but when he ventures into the woke/anti-woke controversy, or talks about Biden being a communist, I cringe a bit. (I have no love for Biden and "leaders" like him, but they are more like crony capitalists, in my view.)
However, I do understand why conservatives are unhappy with trans activism now. It's a bit strange for me to say this, because when I lived in California, my social circle included a fair number of trans, bi, and gay people. I think one of the things conservatives (and quite a few people on the "left") object to is the denial of biological sex. I see this as a problem in an area that I used to be involved with: bicycle racing. When I was racing in my late teens and early 20s, while at UCSC nearly 50 years ago, there were very few women in the sport. I personally knew only one woman who raced, and she was a pretty lonely outlier. But now I see huge packs of women in the annual stage race we have here in Vermont, and it pleases me greatly to see the progress the sport has made. So the idea that a man can declare that he's a woman and start competing in women's races is something I'm not happy about, to say the least. It's demeaning to women and threatens the progress women have made in this sport (and in other sports, I see).
Anyway, that's just my take on a tiny part of the controversy that I care about. I am trying to avoid the rest of the mine field -- it's dangerous out there :-) .
Agreed completely. As I've said in other videos, our love is being used against us and weaponized. The answer isn't going the other way into hate and ridicule. We're being played.
George Webb is now taunting Bob repeatedly saying, roughly: "Please sue ME, Bob. I would love to have a horse farm...I'll even let you keep the prize horse..."
The irony of Malone comedically participating in contentious arenas...while suing inquiry with a suspiciously itchy trigger finger...cannot be overstated.
Excellent article, Tereza.
Thank you, Sarah. Yes, I watched JP Sears some at the beginning but mean-funny humor just makes me sad. And back to my first sentences--I'd rather have an honest enemy than a false friend. At least you know where they stand.
LOL. Well stated Sarah. Not a wasted word.
I’m actually commenting before I read your new Substack about the Breggins. I was finishing reading what I’ve included below (in case you haven’t seen it) So hard to believe Malone is actually going through with suing them! Been wondering who’s actually financing his suit. Thanks Teresa for putting the info out there.
Read this Substack earlier and it just reinforced what I’ve already known about Malone! The implications of these bioweapons are horrific! I have several friends and family members who have cancer now after taking the shot. Malone so proudly brags he invented the mRNA technology which in seems is actually nanotechnology :
Per Dr. Malone’s 1989 clinical publication, he used Lipofectin to penetrate mammalian cells in order to have the cells of mice express the DNA from from the traditional Northeastern firefly, African clawed frog, and fruit fly.
Per ThermoFisher’s website, Lipofectin is the reagent of choice to integrate foreign DNA and RNA into endothelial cells. Endothelial cells are the cells that line our blood vessels, lymph nodes, and heart.
Lipofectin is Used to Integrate the Genetic Sequences of Aggressive Cancer into Humanized Cells
Lipofectin is also very effective at successfully integrating HeLa (the mRNA codes for the most aggressive form of cancer known to man) into human cells to produce cancer inside a mammal (human).
Per the 1996 patent that Dr. Malone is listed as an inventor of, Delivery of Exogenous DNA Sequences in a Mammal, the cationic liposome nanotechnologies can deliver payloads of non-mammal toxic peptides to human cells, such as the bioweapon ricin or cobra snake venom.
When doctors at the University of Pittsburgh tested the respiratory fluid from eight (8) patients who died from severe COVID-19 in 2020 in Lombardy, Italy, they found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contained synthetically recreated cobra venom, Krait venom, rabies virus, and HIV glycoprotein-120.
https://palexander.substack.com/p/karen-kingston-continues-to-gain?utm_medium=email
This is really fascinating, thank you for sending it Teresa. I remember seeing Malone's Nanotherapeutics on his CV but Karen really goes deep. You saw my episode on Snake Venom, yes?
Yes I did! My friend Patrick Jordan has been speaking about snake venom long before covid. He has a YouTube called vaccinefraud.com
Did you see the mention of how they used HeLa stem cells (Henrietta Lacks had the most aggressive form of cervical cancer as well as syphilis) my immediate thought is it any wonder cancer is exploding? Made a few YouTube videos since 2020 when all this started. I’ve moved most of them to Rumble so they don’t get taken down. One of them is about Henrietta, here’s a link if you’re interested https://rumble.com/v10iwba-henrietta-lacks-and-immortal-cell-lines.html
Thank you! I need to move the rest of mine over there too.
fascinating video, thanks.
I'm going to re-post to you what I sent to Teresa re: snake venom, 8 Lombardy deaths, sci-fi reports etc.
Most people don't read reports beyond titles a bit of the abstract and conclusions.
The report you are referencing from Paul Alexander's article is complete rubbish as are most all of these reports on the alleged SARS-CoV-2.
Yet again they use computational models, simulations and structural models and invent worlds inside their little computer boxes to arrive at a set of pre-determined conclusions that distort the reality of what happened.
"Sequence similarities", "probabilities", "like-segments", "may potentially" and on and on. If they wanted to and ran a few more sequences they would find it had "similarities" to baboon fangs.
But they use lots of technical science-y sounding and specialized verbiage so the reader is placed under a spell.
It's total nonsense.
There is no such thing as "Covid-19" and no individuals in Lombardy, Italy- which I know more than a little about- did not die from "severe Covid-19" in Lomardy, Italy.
People need to desist with the fear mongering and look to what actually killed people- hint: It ain't snake venom or some microbe from outer space.
Here is what actually happened in Northern Italy in Spring 2020:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2023/03/07/italy-2020-inside-covids-ground-zero-in-europe/
I agree that the deaths were primarily iatrogenic, but there was certainly something dispersed that gave people a unique set of symptoms. The evidence suggests there was no virus, but something surely happened.
Most people don't read reports beyond titles a bit of the abstract and conclusions.
The report you are referencing from Paul Alexander's article is complete rubbish as are most all of these reports on the alleged SARS-CoV-2.
Yet again they use computational models, simulations and structural models and invent worlds inside their little computer boxes to arrive at a set of pre-determined conclusions that distort the reality of what happened.
"Sequence similarities", "probabilities", "like-segments", "may potentially" and on and on. If they wanted to and ran a few more sequences they would find it had "similarities" to baboon fangs.
But they use lots of technical science-y sounding and specialized verbiage so the reader is placed under a spell.
It's total nonsense.
There is no such thing as "Covid-19" and no individuals in Lombardy, Italy- which I know more than a little about- did not die from "severe Covid-19" in Lomardy, Italy.
People need to desist with the fear mongering and look to what actually killed people- hint: It ain't snake venom or some microbe from outer space.
Please inform yourself as to what actually happened in Northern Italy in Spring 2020:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2023/03/07/italy-2020-inside-covids-ground-zero-in-europe/
I'll look forward to reading that, Allen. Good to have another piece of the puzzle. Love the photo of the swaddled, masked, sunglassed peeps covering everything but their noses!
following up our little conversation-starter :)
you can take the creature out of the black lagoon but you can't take the black lagoon off the creature.
as evidence of that, consider the paucity of true whistleblowers who come from the pharma side/pharmacide. mike yeadon, tess lawrie, sasha, that's about it.
the optics of the suit against the breggins are the biggest tell of all.
let's see, i want to win a libel suit, who do i go after? msnbc? alex jones?
nah. i sue an old couple who are still madly in love, who have a 60+ year track record fighting for the little guy. who have mega experience in front of a jury and would demolish any adversary at trial.
what am i going to sue them over? a theory. that's not even mine.
and who am i going to get to represent me in court? a guy who hasn't won a lawsuit in, like, ever?
this is kabuki theatre. not designed to even reach the point of discovery let alone a trial.
anybody who thinks the suit against the breggins originated with malone is niaive. he's a placeholder. the breggins are over the target and this is an attempt to shut them down, ordered and directed from many levels above malone.
Hahaha. Great analogy! And excellent point about Mike, Tess, Sasha. It's not Malone coming from this world that makes him suspect, any more than genealogy is a tell. It's the current behavior that's suspect and then the history confirms it.
I LOVE your thinking about the Breggins. I've been feeling very protective of them but you're reminding me that they've done a fine job protecting others in front of juries. They're extremely capable.
And I also felt the suit wasn't coming from Malone. I don't think Desmet's theory, as a strategy point, was his idea. I started to put into the essay that he was reminding me of Obama campaigning for his second term--half-heartedly debating, lackluster, until the handlers leaned on him to perk it up. Obama knew he was a fraud and a disappointment to his followers. He was ready to be done. I see that coming for Malone.
i get the sense that he wants to be the new fauci, under kennedy or whoever the 2024 candidate is
good luck with that
That was my guess when Steve Kirsch announced the SuperPAC, right when the Pfizer 'expose' came out. I've heard since that Kennedy's not jumping on the campaign trail. So maybe he has a sense it's a trap.
if there's anybody who knows how the sausage gets made, it's bobby. he seems pretty good at this game of chicken.
btw check this out, this clip is kind of old, at about 47:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-har7k6brY&t=2596s
Well, anyone who uses 'douche-bag' not just once but 20X loses points in my book. I think it's a sexist slur. Not contradicted by Shiva's statement about women who want to "suck Kennedy off." But I did watch to the clip of Kennedy saying he's pro-vaxx and had all 6 of his kids vaccinated. I think Kathleen's point is well taken that things have changed and, along with them, maybe Kennedy's mind. No one else was even in this space of being vaccine-skeptics during the decades that he was going it alone. There are things he may not even have been able to say to himself. His book, however, is the most powerful anti-vaxx, anti-HHS/ NIH/ CDC statement I've ever read.
But I agree totally with Shiva's overall point. Any movement that's top-down is already co-opted and what they're suppressing is anything coming from the bottom-up.
shiva would do well to be less shiva and more boddhisatva if he wants votes
That's an old clip, and I believe RFK has changed his tune on vaccines since he said that. In fact I'm sure he has.
from the content he's been putting out, it would seem so. at least i hope.
Tereza I agree with you 100+ percent. Bravo on the Breggins defense you've presented. Also I will add, I am seeing the pattern of grass root start-up movements being hi-jacked and then steered by the hi-jackers into ineffective oblivion. What good is the size of a movement if it is impotent. The truth is what we should be after, no matter where the chips fall. These movements that go nowhere are probably co-opted with lots of money and promises.
Thank you, Helene. I feel that pattern's been going on for a loooong time. In my book I look at democracy doing that and diverting the rebellion of smallholders, the landless, the colonized and the women/ slaves (same diff) into a competition for smallholders to join the hierarchy.
A decade ago, I saw that bring down the pirate radio station where I used to have my show. It stopped being about broadcasting the truth, which at that time was Amy Goodman, and instead became about giving a voice to the voiceless--whether they had anything to say or not.
In this YT episode I did awhile ago, I talk about Arundhati Roy and John Cusack talking about int'l support being Gandhi-fied and NGO-ized where the right of self-defense was replaced with 'peaceful protest'--totally worthless when you're in the middle of a jungle.
So yes, it's completely their strategy, which is why the 'philanthropaths' are such an important piece.
Like the gladiators. I guess it has been going on a long time! Your book is next on my list and I'm really looking forward to it. I'm still reading Joe Atwill. It's not a super easy read at times and then other times its so obvious so... I know the bible pretty good but the roman history and the jewish history is new to me. I cant wait to read the Shakespeare one. Thank you for all the time you put into humanity.
Oh wow, reading this got me in a big loop trying to understand how they choose people for positions like Fauci.
A loop because I know the correct answer, the honest one.
But we know that will not happen with the way the system works currently.
Now I get why Malone could be tapped for that job. He's building trust among the community that poses the greatest threat to the current corrupt system.
It's admirable that they finally are addressing the concerns of this disaster.
But Malone will not work to quiet the movement. More and more people are questioning even traditional vaccines.
He's just there to appeal to the people who didn't look deep yet.
I bet if he's the NIH director, the movement will quickly see that he's just a tool.
if Mr. M doesn’t get Fauci’s job, there’s always the WHO, Bill & Melinda Foundation
Thanks, Tereza.
"What the Malone v. Breggins lawsuit does is force us to take sides. It isn’t possible to be neutral and side with everyone. $25M is the least of what’s on the line."
This is an excellent insight. The person behind the division projects blame on everyone else. Withdrawing the lawsuit would go far in removing that division and healing some wounds. It appears this is not something RW is interested in.
For those of us paying attention, we have enough reason to question and doubt. RW may be presented as a 'leader' of the medical truth blah blah... but he ain't. He doesn't speak for me, anymore then the idiots in Biden Pretendency speak for me.
I don't want to stay embroiled in ops that were intentionally created to do just that - with endless pathways to follow - consume my valuable time.
I appreciate what you, Sage, JJ, Karen K, and others have brought out. The cracks are there; plenty of info to look at if you want to look. It's a service and an ongoing lesson for all of us: There is a whole world behind the curtain who's job it is, is to manage your perception. It is always ahead of us, it never sleeps and we, being normal folks, don't think like that, assume good intentions and walk into their traps, over and over. Sadly, if someone is thrust into the national stage and given a mic (over and over) and ultimately mucks and muddles the message...well, what do you think is going on? Does Tucker have Mike Yeadon on?
Anyway yours and others' work have confirmed my gut. Malone is irrelevant to me. He may well have handlers and be a prisoner to his persona and compromised via a deal we'll never be privy to. Who knows? For me, I've spent enough time on him.
Thank you for your work, as always.
Let's Make Malone Irrelevant.
Yes, agreed. Well put. It was back in Dec when I first analyzed the lawsuit that I assembled the facts to confirm my own gut feeling. And I think, except for the occasional person who wanders in, my readers have been ahead of me--much of what I present I've gotten from them. So I'm not really trying to convince anyone else.
For me, the motivation has been two-fold for the ten? articles I've now done on Malone. For the last couple, I want to use my analytical skills to be of as much service to the Breggins as possible. My hope is that they feel surrounded by a smart, perceptive, caring community who's not going to let them go this alone.
For the others, it's not so much to prove a point as it is to use Malone as a window into the 'soul' of the psyops, of the Great Reset. What's their next move? Is the US Deep State coordinated with Davos or are they rats fighting over the chicken feeder? I much prefer revealing over healing, so I'm glad that Malone is ramping up the suit rather than dropping it.
Even though my book is nominally about economics, the real topic is the 28 psyops that go back 3500 yrs that have fooled us into serving the empire when we want to take care of our families, communities, homes, people, land and even planet. I don't call them psyops but paradigms and go back to money, democracy, the Constitution, etc. Malone is part of a pattern that we could break, and will break. So maybe he'll be relevant but not in the way he wants ;-)
"My hope is that they feel surrounded by a smart, perceptive, caring community who's not going to let them go this alone." Thank you, I feel the same.
And agree also, Malone is a good for instructional purposes, so yes! relevant that way. And the patterns from those paradigms that have put a choke-hold on human freedom and our ability to thrive, is - I'm with you - breaking. Too many out there now sussing it, to go back to business (slavery under the guise of normal life) as usual.
It's easy to miss the new tracks being plowed that will lead us to a new world, when we're still dealing with the many tentacled assaults and operations. But new tracks are forming, and they will make it easier for others to jump on to, soon.
I appreciate your take on things and your tenacity, Tereza. Thank you.
I'd like to forget the Malone/Breggin dispute, which is continuing to rage on at Dr. Meryl Nass' substack, for example. But I can't. Why not? Because Malone won't let me or anyone else forget about it, by dropping that stupid lawsuit.
Malone needs to put his big-boy pants on and agree to disagree without getting into lawfare. Malone also has a huge problem with Desmet and his continued support of Desmet's psychobabble, and he won't let that go, either.
Who is dividing the medical freedom community? Not Breggin: he's just saying it as he sees it and was doing that long before Malone decided, "pharma bad." Malone is dividing the medical freedom movement, and the proof for that is that what was once a little deal (many people paid little attention to Breggin prior to the lawsuit) has been turned into a huge deal that just won't die down. Happy, then, Dr. Malone?
A word about Dr. Nass, whom I admire. She recently admitted she never read Desmet's book. To me that goes a long way toward explaining why she still stands behind Malone.
I don't think Malone is a bad person. But, by their deeds ye shall know them, and Malone's deeds show him to be a vindictive and stubborn man who cares more about his sacred "integrity" than he does about the bigger battle. He is dividing the movement; not Breggin, Malone.
I continue to cite your excellent work refuting Desmet, Jim. I think you're as tired of that topic as maybe I am of Malone. Have you read the Breggins articles on it, before or after you wrote yours? They're also beautifully perceptive, logical and deeply informed. I think you would feel in good company.
And I'm personally glad for the lawsuit. I would never have looked at Malone so closely and would never have questioned him until it was too late, and we'd been led off a cliff. But I agree with your point. I've often been accused, in other instances, of creating conflict and one of my mantras is that conflict can't be created. It can just be brought to the surface where people have to deal with it, but it was there to begin with. That's what we're doing with Malone, bringing to the surface how his words and actions are in conflict, but we didn't create that conflict.
I read what Breggin said about Desmet, after Malone sued. Breggin is spot-on.
Something is rotten in Denmark
I’ve only read the first sentences and I just had to say...🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼...before I read any further.
Haha, you make me so happy, Sarah. I knew someone would get that.
Good read Tereza.
As usual, I can't give it the follow up it deserves, but found a few points to comment on.
It took me a couple of months of on-again, off-again reading to finish Lobaczewski's "Political Ponerology: The Science of Evil, Psychopathy, and the Origins of the Totalitarian State" ... and though I don't believe for a minute that a 'science of evil' will save us from ourselves any more than an 'evolutionary biology of deception' will ... I think he does shed more light than Desmet on the moral culpability of the few, those who are predisposed to have contempt for others, or worse ... dehumanize them, and step over a moral line.
Although I haven't crafted a prompt that takes a more critical approach to assumptions, reasoning, and salience/validity of data ... Chat GPT does a pretty good job of summarizing the main points of the book, and in less than a minute.
A more overtly literary metaphor has recently come to my attention through a podcast by Liv Boeree ... "Moloch" as a metaphor for competition pushed to such sociopathic extremes, the end game is either dystopia or extinction.
Here is a link to the first of many "Moloch memes' I am now finding ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCSsKV5F4xc.
I think it has a weak point in focusing the evil away from the lack of moral responsibility by specific individuals and blaming the system ... a bit like Desmet's theory of Mass Formation Psychosis. But that also brings us back to a point of difference between our understanding of human nature.
I think the problem of scale necessitates systems, ideologies, or a shared mythos as a proxy for the immediate and uniquely individual empathy between members of a small community ... that Dunbar's number thingy. I remember you once writing that 'spheres of influence' can involve millions ... but that is where the strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (linguistic relativity) comes in ... an ad-hoc herding of the social primate through logic and language as proxies for individually specific empathy.
I guess as good an example as Pol Pot would be Led Zepplin performing live. What one achieved through orders and fear, the other did through pleasure and passion — a mass formation of shared values, emotions, and reason ... even if the time-scale persistence of the effect was vastly different ... and the carefully crafted illusion that 'Pol Pot is singing to you, as an individual'. 😅 Beatlemania, history as taught in public education, MSM, all carefully crafted illusions appealing to our deepest, most personal sense of identity ... and actually creating our identities ... but only if they catch us during the early stages of the maturation process ... or at an arrested stage of development. Large scale depends on perpetuating a sense of dependency on those at the tops of the hierarchies, hence the deep connections between a world culture (yes, here in Japan too) obsessed with youth, competitiveness, and success at scale (submitting that 5 year business plan in order to gather investment).
Playing a riff off that music metaphor ... although I've been to my share of large scale jazz events, I never really got into the theater of it all, preferring the intimacy of a cellar dive with maybe a dozen others, the audience determining the nuances of the performance as much as the performers eliciting a reaction from the audience. It is not so much the genre, but the authenticity of the musical communication I appreciate. Would feel just at home back in rural North Carolina listening in on a couple of back-porch, old-timers trading licks, of call-and-response with 'Appalachian' music or blues.
Two musical YouTubers I follow, Rich Beato and Adam Neely had a recent discussion, which was otherwise good, but then the question of whether they, themselves, would be musically relevant 80 years from now came up. I immediately felt a bit of Molochian discomfort with even considering that question. IF they were authentic, and in the moment, 80 years relevance might be an emergent property arising from their authenticity. But I guess it would be tough to set up the cameras, lights, videos, timing, etc. and still keep the illusion of spontaneous authenticity.
It felt like a 'tail wagging the dog' kind of moment, a bit like the Japanese high school kid who proudly said her ambition was to win a Nobel Prize ... when just a few years earlier, an actual Nobel Prize winner from Japan said the prize was not a goal. It was post-hoc recognition for someone who had spent their life in the moment, pursuing a passion in science, and with positive effects on society. At least I can go with his ideal, not the kid's.
Again, extending that music as metaphor thingy ... it seems like the technological 'progress' in music since the industrial era (analog recording, electronics, and now digital A.I.) ... is a process of contriving and scaling up to mass production-consumption of authentic spontaneity. I imagine even tribal war dances or spring festivals had unpredictable nuances to the music and movement ... which finely tuned digitalization is trying to capture, for mass consumption.
In the history of jazz and other popular music, there has been on-again, off-again controversy between the musicians about the authenticity of committing a performance to vinyl, then tape, then CD, and now digital audio. A lot of people do not realize that improvisation was a big part of the show of pre-orchestral classic musicians such as Mozart, and have reduced classic music to a formula as readily as metaphors become part of prose ... now closer to a marker of economic class division than of musical prowess.
I guess we, the informed consumer, have our own drawn lines beyond which 'contrived spontaneity' should not cross. Milli Vanilli was one of the more famous faux-pas in that social construct that seems quaint by today's standards of mixing samples from memorable past recordings with 'new' pieces. And some of us recognize modern 'capitalism' or 'democracy' as a kabuki show ... that 'we know they're lying, they know we know, and we know they know we know' thingy.
Lobaczewski talks a bit about how emotions (including the Japanese obsession with ambition) are transferred to and between large populations, usually at the subliminal level (I think he calls it 'transference') but as we are now seeing through the government nudge units that Laura Dodsworth wrote about, it can be overtly consciously manipulated behaviorist psychology.
Lobaczewski doesn't go into detail about how people who are individually acquainted can use language and logic (art forms included) to effect mass movements. I guess an analysis of that process is a necessarily never-ending, multi-disciplinary 'science' (or art) beyond the scope of any single book. And I guess you are one in as a good a position to take that broad view as any. 4 years in social-psychology grad school is a lot of reading, listening, and sharing of ideas.
As for Malone ... largely thanks to you, I see him as a not-so-benign player. The moral flip-side of a renaissance man. Alas one of the unfortunate weaknesses of our species is that the most sociopathic individuals appear to be also the most cunning predators among us.
The 'contrived spontaneity' that many struggling-to-pay-the-rent artists aspire, may contain some effective altruists, or people like Joni Mitchell who consciously used music as self therapy, and a wide range of others along a moral spectrum.
But those who 'spontaneously contrive' are a different animal. The kind that Lobaczewski talks about ... the trauma-driven narcissists and opportunists, or born to the bone psychopaths that make up a small minority of any population.
I suspect Malone is among that minority, and I don't really have an answer of how to deal with such types. I have not been very successful in Japan. Gaslighting has long been accepted as a management technique over here, and as a permanent foreigner, I don't really have a defense against that in the work-place. If I did not have a small, empathy-driven community of Japanese friends, I would have offed myself long ago.
I wish had more time to keep up with the dots you are connecting.
Cheers Tereza,
steve
Thank you for taking the time to share your in-depth thoughts with me, Steve. I'm really glad you brought up Lobaczewski. One of the 'tonic masculinity bros,' Harrison Koehli, has been doing a series on the book on his stack, Political Ponerology. I think it's actually the same mechanism as Desmet's with a different application. Desmet blames the masses, L blames the 'bad to the bone' evil psychopaths. Neither blames the system. Maybe the Moloch meme does, I'll check that out.
With the decentralized economic system I describe in my book, it allows culture and community to be formed at that Dunbar's number while fostering an exchange of cultures between. You, of all people, would thrive in my economy Steve. You're the perfect example of 'no good deed goes unpunished' in the current system. But one that fostered reciprocity and giving is exactly up your alley.
I remember cellar venues! Wine houses with barrels for tables and stools, with candles that had dripped down over bottles. O for real candles! That was when we knew how to live dangerously.
I'm predicting a resurgence of live local music, maybe poetry readings. Once the 5G rollout magnetizes all the nano particles in our blood, we'll have to shut down the whole wifi system, have occasional visits to wired hubs just for research or to get our mail. Gallows humor ... maybe.
Hi Tereza,
Just waking up from a fitful sleep. A few summer days have arrived early in Tokyo, before a weekend chill hits back again.
Good summary-comparison you made there between Desmet, Lobaczewski, and the Molloch meme. One big fear I have is that metaphors are sometimes taken out of context and there will be some who take Molloch for more than a metaphor ... a bit like the flip side of fundamentalist religion. We will just have to see where some influencers run with that.
Thank YOU, for the feedback. I have GOT to read your book, but on that long flight back to Japan, I cracked open Isobel Wilkerson's "Caste" ... a well written, but grim read about one aspect of human nature. Will keep in touch and get to your book soon. Now still processing my mother's rapid deterioration, as well as my own mortality.
Cheers,
steve
Thank you for this excellent post.
I'm glad that you're not tired of hearing about the same topic. I keep wanting to get to other things but this pulls me back. There are so many elements and my admiration for the Breggins keeps growing.
OMG, I'm soooooo glad I saw your post over here: https://tessa.substack.com/p/fake-heroes/comments
I guess I must have just subscribed to her--this is the first time I've read anything from her, and her post was very ambiguous. I was about to drop a link to my favorite post from Diana West on Robert Malone (https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/4421/Dr-Robert-Malone-A-Risk-Analysis.aspx) and then I read your post about how she defends him!?!?! OMG!! Maybe I'll drop the link anyway. (I did, so I'll see what happens)
Thanks for that support! I love Tessa and I'm hoping that this is a post that she's changing her mind but maybe not, it's hard to tell. In this one, I quote extensively from that excellent Diana West article, but it's always good to draw more attention to it: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-the-breggins-part-one
I truly know nothing about Tessa--I've never read anything at her substack before, so I just assumed it was a warning about Robert Malone!! Lol, then I read further and saw your comment. Hopefully people will start to wake up. We really don't have time for the infighting when it seems like they are moving forward with CBDCs at an accelerated pace.
Here's something interesting. I'm just listening to Peter Breggin on his show when I learn that Simone Gold referred this author Mark Mcdonald to Mathias Desmets new book on mass formation psychosis
https://open.spotify.com/episode/4ysALVsPLFrupoGfp2kwUR?si=_RQvCSbMS8aVCJAiHU_CEw&t=667
I heard on RTE Podcast that Simone Gold is a real grifter, embezzling 30MUSD. https://rumble.com/v2eyzxe-rtd-discussions-27-the-americas-front-line-doctors-controversy-w-kristin-el.html
Teo, I've had your Substack bookmarked to thank you for recommending my book. That's so kind of you!
This is very interesting. I listened to the first, that you conveniently set at the pertinent info. That's a whole new wrinkle that RM may have stolen this phrase from McDonald and made it mean something completely different. I did an early video, pre-Substack, that talked some about The United States of Fear: https://youtu.be/ifRlBglQvXA.
It seems true to his m.o. to use what others are saying, and twist it to mean the opposite.
Thanks. Thought it was worth mentioning to you, because you are one of the sharpest people I know of!
I too have enjoyed JP Sears videos in the past, but when he ventures into the woke/anti-woke controversy, or talks about Biden being a communist, I cringe a bit. (I have no love for Biden and "leaders" like him, but they are more like crony capitalists, in my view.)
However, I do understand why conservatives are unhappy with trans activism now. It's a bit strange for me to say this, because when I lived in California, my social circle included a fair number of trans, bi, and gay people. I think one of the things conservatives (and quite a few people on the "left") object to is the denial of biological sex. I see this as a problem in an area that I used to be involved with: bicycle racing. When I was racing in my late teens and early 20s, while at UCSC nearly 50 years ago, there were very few women in the sport. I personally knew only one woman who raced, and she was a pretty lonely outlier. But now I see huge packs of women in the annual stage race we have here in Vermont, and it pleases me greatly to see the progress the sport has made. So the idea that a man can declare that he's a woman and start competing in women's races is something I'm not happy about, to say the least. It's demeaning to women and threatens the progress women have made in this sport (and in other sports, I see).
Anyway, that's just my take on a tiny part of the controversy that I care about. I am trying to avoid the rest of the mine field -- it's dangerous out there :-) .
Agreed completely. As I've said in other videos, our love is being used against us and weaponized. The answer isn't going the other way into hate and ridicule. We're being played.
Pure stagged entertainment, much like the Trump show.
At best Malone's confessions are straight from the CIA's playbook of limited hangout. But this goes beyond that deceit.
FYI I'm not big on the opinions of Soviet emigres.
(CIA Director William Casey stated in 1981 “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”)