On the 80th anniversary of WW2 Liberation Day, it's time for the truth to come out—starting with WWI and how Germany was betrayed in exchange for the Balfour Declaration and Palestine.
Really interesting! Are you familiar with Michael Hoffman's stuff? I really enjoy Nevermore.and consider Graeber's book the Dawn of Everything to be really helpful, as well as Robert Lawlor's stuff....and Steiners analysis if how Germany was set up in WW! to be in accord with your perceptions.
My book builds on the foundation of David's work in Debt. I tried hard to get a copy to him but, alas, that's never to be. I don't know Robert Lawlor but yes, I've found Steiner really interesting. I have his two volumes on The Karma of Unknowing, thanks to a comment on a previous episode where Michael Fuller wrote:
"I am particularly struck and delighted (strange quality, I know), that you and Michael Hudson point out the fact that the US and the West have spent most of their waking lives since 1900 trying to destroy Germany. This resonates with the deeper thought from Rudolf Steiner that the reason they do this is to prevent Germany and Russia form working together into the future to help bring about a more spiritual, more brotherly epoch. ( I'm sorry this is so shorthand - please ask if you want specific details of Steiner's ideas [ 6,000 lectures, 50 books])
"However, in a nutshell he suggests that for this kind, brotherly, earth-respecting spiritual impulse to succeed, it will need those of us in the West who can see through the mind-games of the Western military industrial complex to inwardly and outwardly support the idea of this Middle Europe/Slavic future epoch. This means, amongst much else, looking within ourselves and allowing kindness, humility and openness to grow, qualities which you reference beautifully at the end of the essay when you speak of the film."
I need to go back and read more Steiner! Thanks for reminding me of him.
Michael Hoffman runs "Revisionist History:" and wrote a really valuable book called "twilight Language" and introduced the concept of "Revelation of the method"...also a book on usury and debt that is much aligned with David's essential book on debt. Robert Lawlor wrote "Visions of the First Day" and spent most of his life living with the Dravidians in India and the aboriginals of Australia, all matrist, and makes the claim that patriarchy can only happen in Kali Yuga. Steiner's essays about the Rhodsian Anglo-American urgency to separate Germany and Russia is quite remarkable. Thanks for your work.
Ah, that makes sense. I've been hesitant to use the term Revisionist History for what I'm doing. It makes it seem like we're revising history, when it's actually the reverse. History has already been revised and we're correcting it--so I called my playlist on YT Corrected History.
Yes, someone just mentioned 'revelation of the method' to me. I don't know if Hoffman comes to the same conclusion but I have a theory on why. In the superstition of the Set cult, the sacrifice is only worthy if the victim is willing. So they need to warn us, in coded language, so that we have a chance to figure it out and refuse. When we use their language, with its hidden hexes, it shows that we've acquiesced to our own sacrifice.
Thanks for all the good recommendations! My Amazon cart overfloweth!
Oh! And Paul Cudenec was the other person with Mees who was plotting the May 8th Declaration. I only dropped his name from the video because I was afraid I was going to mispronounce it. But it's been great to communicate with him, and he liked the WW2ruth name. He also thought getting everyone to agree on the wording for a Declaration (since the three of us was hard enough) seemed daunting. Thanks for pointing me to his essay!
I'm about a third of the way through "Hitler's War", up to the beginning of the attack on Russia. The book does describe some efforts by the Germans to expel Jews. The idea was to deport them to their home countries, like Poland. But these countries, including Poland, refused to take the expelled Jews. (That has some interesting parallels with what's been happening in Palestine lately.) In one instance, the Germans put Polish Jews on trains and sent them over the Polish border.
Another interesting incident is the one known as Kristallnacht. Hitler kept insisting to his underlings that he didn't want Jews to be harmed; he was particularly fond of a well-known department store run by Jews. But Goebbels seemed to have ignored the Boss's instructions and instigated a fair amount of violence. Hitler was appalled afterwards when he found out, but didn't do much about it and let it slide.
But mostly the book covers Hitler's thoughts and actions as he proceeded with his various wars, using original writings (such as diaries) from his underlings. There's very little so far about the Jews, other than the two things I mentioned above. Maybe because that's not the focus of the book, or maybe more happened in that area after Jan. 1941 that I haven't seen yet.
I'm really glad you're reading that dense tome, Mark, so I can get my information from you. I remember reading that Goebbels had a mistress, an actress from another country. Hitler was friends with Goebbels' wife and disapproved of his affair. Goebbels enacted Kristallnacht as a bid to replace Hitler, responding to popular sentiment. Hitler's reluctance to take any action against the Jews was not popular--he was under pressure to do more. Remember, it was because of the Ashkenazis that Germany was crushed and betrayed after they had acted honorably in the Great War. We may not have known about the Balfour Declaration but they certainly did.
On the one hand, you have the concept of religious freedom, which sounds fine and dandy. Anyone against that would be a horrible bigot, right? And then you have a religion of racial supremacy that says anything done to the outsider for the benefit of the group is approved by god. So you have the Kol Nidre, the prayer of asking forgiveness a year in advance for lying. And you have early American courts saying they don't know how to deal with the Jewish immigrants because being under oath means nothing to them. The statistical instances of fraud speak for themselves.
It's why I think the Torah, which anyone with a Bible in their home can verify, is such an important document. It shows that the morality, ethics and honor of the religion is inverted--what we would consider awful is beloved by god. So do you respect a religion that doesn't respect other people? That's the dilemma we've been put in.
I think there's no similarity between the countries that don't want to take in Palestinians--so Israel can ethnically cleanse the land and foist them on other Arab nations--and the home countries of Ashkenazis who refused to take them back. It's the exact opposite. Palestine is the home country of Palestinians. Whereas Germany wanted to send back Polish Yahwists for the same reason Poland evicted them--following the precepts of a sociopathic god. It's the behavior, not the people, that was rejected by 170 countries.
Interesting that you should mention the Torah. My mother, although an Episcopalian, has been for many years in a Torah class run by the local synagogue. I asked her in a recent email if the rabbis who teach the class believe in the stories about their god killing millions of people. (I mentioned the Elisha/42 dead kids story and she hadn't heard of it.) She said, no, the rabbis are Reform and don't believe in the literal truth of the writings. My mom doesn't believe in all of the New Testament stories either.
I'm not sure what this all means; it's just something I noticed.
We could debate for hours about the subject, meaning the issue is alive and full of noise and confusion. Today, 9th May marks the 80th aniversary of the Red Army victory on nazi Germany. As Zukhov said: They will never forgive us for defeating fascism. Nobody, with the exception of Emmanuel Todd, could predict the URSS would collapse so suddenly and catastrophically.
Even if the combined net zero, pandemic, cbdc, transhuman megaplan for a global reset and a new world monopoly steered by London anglosionists (Rothschilds?) seems to tank, we better learn some lessons or we are toast.
Thanks for that recommendation, Yoni! I like the idea that the issue is alive and full of noise and confusion. Much better than the truth being dead, buried and silent!
Benjamin Freedman's speech explains a lot that I just couldn't understand.
The difference now is that the U.S. doesn't really require any other allies to continue the work in Palestine. Trillion dollar defense budgets and 800 worldwide military bases somewhat ensures our abilities.
And an unwitting populace that is either financially complicit or afraid of threat to reel in the fleecing of our tax money to continue supporting the Zionist agenda.
Every single one of our politicians who takes AIPAC money is corrupted. And the Kol Nidre sanctifies the lies and cheating.
Yes!!! If there was only one document that I would say everyone should read on this subject, it's Freedman's speech. How can I have gone 66 yrs without knowing about it?
I'm not sure about the US and its power. Ukraine depleted all the weapons stock. The Great Contraction is happening in employment, so funds are going down even with the ones taken from gov't services ala the AI Doge. Can the US get the material it needs to make more? And then you have to factor in the competence of the MIC. Most of what they produce are overpriced pieces of junk.
Russia's 'hazelnut' oreshniks, I think they're called, are far, far superior to anything the US has. Sure Israel and the US have nukes, but they can't use them without hitting Israel too. So I wouldn't say those trillion dollar defense budgets and 800 military bases predict anything. I agree with the title of Fadi's book on "Why the West Can't Win."
Tereza, Your research & writing are amazing. The Zion oligarch & cabal have been committing murder in nations through such as the False Arab Spring & US aggression wars now, killing on average >1 million people per year = 80 million killed since WW2. You need to publicly provide indoctrinated dissenters with Chauvinist tendencies, with an intelligent way & methodology to challenge what your are saying. You can set up a list of criterial to engage you publicly in published debate. Such criteria, if you receive a number of challengers, is to have them debate among themselves & choose a Spokesperson. In any case we take the emphasis off of any published material as being sacrosanct & put create a field of intelligent exchange. Here's the method I offer in my writing. it will be interesting to see how you go about such exchange.
Thank you so much, Douglas. Like you, I've given a lot of thought to how to have arguments, which is what I call a productive disagreement. First, like the person you're arguing with. Second, state the question. Third, define the terms. Fourth, say why it matters. Fifth, brainstorm all possible answers. Sixth, weigh the pros and cons of each.
I might say that the overarching question is 'Have we been lied to about the history of the world wars?' If there's even one thing that's been presented as absolute truth that we know to be a lie, then everything else has to be open to question. You can't say, 'Oh, they wouldn't lie about that.' We already know they would.
I'm just a housewife trying to figure things out for my own benefit. These are my best guesses, based on my research. The best 'arguments' are with other people trying to do the same, like you, Douglas. I think you and I both feel that it doesn't take convincing people in order to change the mind-set of the world. Two people coming to a new place changes everything. I know our conversations have already changed the world.
Yes, we were lied to about the WWs and their motivations. Where we start the deception whether 500 or 800 years ago or even 2000 or 5000 years ago is up for debate. I say we start with the inception of the USA and the intention to weaponize our currency since it{s tangible yet greatly misunderstood. Let's keep in mind we see the world through filters that create reality, which may or may or may not be more fluid than we realize.
https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory.wordpress.com/about/ here's some information about WWI. About a decade ago, I watched a Summer's worth of films about WWI at the AFI in Silver Spring, MD. The reasons given for WWI are incoherent and well, silly.
It’s about time people learned it was to destroy Germany by the blood line illuminati …. David Livinstone has 6 books on this ordo a chao something like that…..
Since the impact of WWII on global politics, economics, financial and monetary systems persists till today, it is essential that the truth all the truth and nothing but the truth about all events from the 1919 Versailles Peace Conference to 1950 have to be clarified.
Furthermore the kid brainwashing in western nations that has been ongoing for over 50 years has had a highly detrimental effect on the psyche of people in the west and forms the basis for justifying the ongoing genocide committed by the Zionists since 1947.
Quote: "a supposed ‘final solution’ in Germany, that somehow increased the census number of Jews worldwide, justifies the actual final solution of the massacre of Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Iranians, Iraqis and Yemenis. These are to create Greater Israel that happens to match the borders of ancient Canaan."
>> as noted in comment above
Quotes:
"3,000,000 in Russia, 750,000 in France, 400,000 in Britain and 10,000 in Belgium"
"in the years immediately after the end of WWII, there were 5.7M excess deaths for Germans"
>> Thank you for enlightening us, despite avid reading, I had never heard about this before reading your substack.
Quote: "Nomadic bands of men called the Habiru were given the right to rape, kill, pillage and claim the virgins for themselves. In exchange, they obeyed the Heka Khasut, the Aryan ruling caste who spoke for the male god Set. In the Torah he becomes Yahweh but the techniques of terror, taxation and word tricks are the same."
>> Never stopped, did it?
Quote: "I thought it would be easier to train cats to do synchronized swimming than to get WW2ruthers to agree on a declaration"
Haha, I thought of you Fadi with the synchronized swimming cats ;-) I always know you'll get and appreciate my jokes and I can't stop snickering picturing that one.
I hope other people pick up that WW2ruth label. I think it's much less clumsy than 'revisionist history.'
I think it was the Merlin Stone book where she described the borders of Canaan and I realized that's what 'Greater Israel' is aiming for.
I owe Nefahotep for those stats on post-war Germany. I find the enslavement in foreign countries more shocking than the deaths. I can't even imagine 3M Germans being taken to Russia as slaves. Domestic slaves? Industrial? Mining? These had to be women and children, the men had already been killed. Factory barracks? I want more information on this, as much as I dread it. I'd say it seems so primitive but the more I'm finding out about primitive times, the more sensible they seem by comparison.
Richard, I'm so happy that you saw my comment and came here, and that you provided the direct link to your stack. Subbed! I find the format of Substack's comment threads much more convivial for real conversation. Unz sometimes gets the same people commenting everywhere, just to be clever and one-up each other. Although the caliber of readership is unparalleled, and I'm always delighted when I can lure someone to my stack from there.
The unz comments section convinces me that the left are right about comment moderation, they are just wrong about what should be moderated.
This essay is the same you praised recently. It is more or less an addendum of "Denouncing HItler for Diffferent Reasons," which angered both mainstream conservatives and HItler idolators. That essay is found both on unz and TOO, but my substack as well. Should be easily found in top posts or a search, or just look in the section "Core Texts."
739 comments on Denouncing Hitler for Different Reasons! I'm even more touched that you read and remember mine.
Very funny about the left and comment moderation! I adhere to a strict policy on my stack that I don't allow insults to groups or individuals, including myself, but any ideas or positions are welcome. Because I discuss such controversial ideas, it would make it easy to discredit the whole if cheap shots were allowed. Plus, I feel it's like a dinner party in my home. That one rule would wipe out a number of Unz commenters ;-)
And thank you for subbing me! Yours is the most discerning list I've made since Laurent Guyenot's, who has even fewer subs he reads than you ;-)
Pardon me, BMR, if I don't take 'clear in your mind' as absolute proof. It's definitely not an issue that would serve the 'Jews' to suspect that Hitler worked for the Rothschilds, against the interest of the German people. It would draw more attention to the Transfer Agreement that made 'Israel' possible and why 'Israelis' want to erect a statue to him there. It casts tremendous doubt on the holocaust narrative and why 60% of inmates in Dachau were Catholic. It gives credibility that the true 'Nazis' were the Zionists, as they certainly have been in Ukraine. From my research, they wanted to force 'Jews' to populate Palestine and so did the false flag pogroms in Russia and elsewhere. And perhaps they orchestrated Kristallnacht too. It certainly served their efforts, both in presenting the holders of German wealth as victims and convincing those wealthy Jewish-Germans to take their money--thanks to Hitler's Transfer Agreement--and build 'Israel.'
Neither side of this disagreement serves the mainstream narrative/ psyop of the 'Jews' as victims (I keep putting that in quotes because it's another word trick). It's therefore a useful debate to have.
Hi Tereza, I don’t know much about WWII except that the Nazi symbol looks awfully a lot like the Indian spiritual symbol I grew up with and saw all over temples and sacred sites around India. So I appreciate how much research you’ve done, all your past videos you’ve linked, and your comments in response to readers.
I happened across it as I was trying to learn more about central banking and that was the first time I had seen the economic/financial policies of Hitler portrayed in a wholly positive light. Written by Stephen Mitford Goodson, former Director of the South African Reserve Bank (!) Not sure if it’s a reliable source since thought to ask what you thought of it
Hi, LoWa. And yes! Somewhere in the comment threads of those episodes, someone makes that same point and gives links and references that the svastika is an ancient symbol of good fortune: Sanskrit svastika, from svasti well-being, from su- well + as- to be; akin to Sanskrit asti he is, Old English is; from its being regarded as a good luck symbol.
But now, knowing that Sanskrit was imported to India as the ritual language of the Hexing Set Cult, who wrote the patriarchal and colorist Vedas, I have to think of the implications. Doesn't that seem like a tell that it's the same people? Not the Germans at all but the Rothschilds. Interesting clue!
I haven't seen the Goodson book before but it looks very interesting. I see the picture of Qaddafi but I wonder if he talks about Laurent Gbagbo, who was the real genius behind the Pan-African dinar, as I wrote about in my Libya chapter:
"Muammar Qaddafi and Laurent Gbagbo, President of Cote d’Ivoire, to create a Pan-African dinar backed by the gold held by Libya. The Pan-African dinar could have been used for intra-continental trade and would have enabled Africa to control its own development. To this end, Qaddafi had created the African Investment Bank in Sirte and the African Monetary Fund in Camaroon. The AMF would have circumvented the IMF, and the AIB would have displaced the BIS.
"But deprived of the profits from African oil, the franc would have sunk like a capsized Titanic. And without a monopoly as the world’s oil currency, US dollars would be flushed out into the market so fast they’d leave a vapor trail. This may explain why a NATO air strike and a French bullet conspired to end Qaddafi’s life. Both the US and France had plenty to lose, as far as the bankers were concerned."
I learned about the Feder plan, which is what Hitler implemented, from Ellen Brown in Web of Debt. But I still think that Ben Franklin is the least controversial example--who can demean him?
Very helpful, thanks for all these leads! No, Goodson’s book doesn’t mention Gbagbo (if I recall correctly) so this is super interesting to discover! I can wait to check out Web of Debt too.
And yes, gosh, the history of India really is so tangly, I had never thought of the hexing set cult before reading your work. I think into the 90’s there were still some distant pagan tribes in India relatively untouched by development (Enna Reitort mentions this in podcasts about Krivda) so perhaps there are clues there of what spirituality in India used to be before Brahminism/Vedas/Hinduism.
No, Ma'am, it doesn't serve jews but sews doubt used by them to peel away undecided and keep conflict among their distracted. The old divide and conquer.
I think that Hitler was true to his word. I'm sure that Irving would believe so (having read a good bit from him).
There are many on this stack who agree with you. Notably, Julius Skoolafish who may be the best-read of my readers. He makes a very compelling case and has sent some resources I've watched that leave me convinced ... until I read some other sources, and then I'll be convinced the other way. I think there's a valid case to be made in either direction.
But 100% of the people who think the extermination of six million 'Jews' was real believe that Hitler was serving the interests of the German people, yes? So those two beliefs are entirely compatible and strengthen the victim narrative for why Israel must exist because every other country has irrational homicidal intents toward the 'Jews'.
If the 'owner' of Israel, Rothschild, put Hitler in power to defeat Germany from within, it makes it impossible that the holocaust narrative could be true. Rothschild would not have killed six million Jews through his agent, Hitler. In order to consider that possibility, which would make the AshkeNazis the perpetrators and not the victims, you need to first conclude the holocaust narrative is false. We are in agreement about that, yes? If you want to be divided among the very few of us that realize that as a fact, because I question whether Germany's defeat was betrayal from within once again, that's on you, not me.
I know Julius from before here (I think we both read at Winter Watch). Yes, we basically agree on most regarding this issue from what I remember. I think Russ at Winter Watch espouses the same theory as you, basically.
But don't get me wrong, although that was the only point I focused on, it isn't really important to me because what we are experiencing right now isn't exactly related (nor do we have enough homogeneity in America to make such a movement work here).
We do agree that the hoax is basically 100% invented hogwash built around a work camp system. However, I doubt that Rothschid or any of them would blink at killing people for whatever goal they have (I just don't think that Hitler was a tool used in that goal). Did Hitler make mistakes that played into their hands? Absolutely.
Carolyn Yeager is another who would likely disagree with the Hitler betrayed Germany for Rothschilds theory.
Please understand that I very much appreciate your stack and your work (I just haven't commented before now).
Yes, I think you're right that Julius reads Winter Watch. I'm sure he'll be weighing in before long but, being in Australia, it might be night for him. I appreciate you telling me that you've been reading and liking my stack.
To me, the question isn't whether Hitler was a Rothschild agent, but whether that question is legit or another psyop that serves the Zionist agenda. My argument is that asking the question gives more legitimacy to questioning the world war narrative, including the holocaust.
Those who question the holocaust narrative are generally presented as pro-Hitler--as you and Julius are, and from the speeches, policies and writings I've read, I would agree with you. However, we know the brilliant economic plan was Gottfried Feder. And that Hitler was an actor and certainly capable of reading someone else's script. My theory gives more credit to the Nat'l Soc party, that it was a collective full of people with good ideas, not just one man.
I find the circumstances of Hitler's death suspicious. Too calm, like it was any other day. And the mistakes he made militarily, and that he didn't delegate authority but also didn't allow anyone to wake him before noon. And invading Russia in winter--who does that? I do think it's worth reading both sides, with the other taken from Nefahotep, who got it from Firestarter: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/my-hitler-journey.
But no one who thinks he betrayed Germany for Rothschild can be accused of being a Hitler fan. Without Hitler, would Germany have won the war and protected their own sovereignty, creating an economic model that would have brought down the Rothschild banking system?
I think it's a worthy question, no matter what the answer is.
I am truly befuddled by some of your claims. The Pharaohs were Aryan? That's news to me... do you have any proof of that?
"The Cult of Set started with the largest division possible, making men superior to women and using atrocity to destroy the Goddess societies that made the Era Before Common all flourish. Adam put an end to that. Then the races were divided into four with Noah’s sons: Shem, Japheth, Ham and tiny little Canaan. The race of Shem was given rule over all the others, with descendants of Ham and Canaan to be their slaves. Fortunately, the other races didn’t listen."
Who says that the race of Shem was given rule over the others? I'm confused... and I'm sure I'm not alone.
Hi, Crow. Although I'm sure you're not alone, no one who's read my episodes on the Torah would question who gave the race of Shem rule over the others--Yahweh. Here's my first one that quotes the story of Noah past the rainbow: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-devil-and-naomi-wolf and here are others:
We're on the same side, right, for sovereignty and against empire, the rule of some over others. It feels like you're being adversarial, asking for 'proof' rather than two people comparing research.
The Heka Khasut were a different race than the Habiru. Egyptian paintings show men with red hair. The word Pharaoh didn't exist before the cult of Set. It was Par-O, the household of the priestesses. Nefahotep writes about that also.
I'm looking forward to reading your piece on the Aryans because I don't know where they came from and whether they're different than the Luvians from Anatolia, who are my best guess for the northern invaders. But I don't need you to prove anything to me. I'm just happy for your knowledge and clues about what really happened and who did what.
We certainly are on the same side, so I apologize if my post came off as adversarial... I think that the work you are doing in challenging the WWII is important... but you seem to be mixing in some highly debatable theories about ancient history, which I don't think strengthens your case.
I don't know that much about ancient Egypt, but I am an archaeology buff. If I can't follow your arguments, I'm sure there are a lot of people who are in the same boat.
But maybe I just haven't explored your work enough. Let me look into some of your claims a bit more and get back to you.
The theories I present are my own, Crow. Were I to abandon them in order to convince someone of someone else's theories that are less controversial, I'm not sure why I'd bother to write. I should just repost other people.
My overall premise is that people are ALL inherently good and, when they behave badly, systems and stories are to blame. The primary system that makes good people do bad things is economics. The primary story that makes good people do bad things are the religions of superiority.
You've made a decision to believe in the story of Jesus, which is built on the Torah. That choice means that anything that conflicts with your decision has to be rejected. I respect your choice but I think you should speak for yourself and not others when you say you can't follow my arguments--which lead to a place you've decided not to go.
I guess the other thing is that your readers might be left with the impression that the Bible condones the rule of the sons of Shem over the sons of Japheth and Ham. It doesn't.
Noah does curse Canaan (not Ham) whilst drunk, and this is a strange and controversial passage that is open to various interpretations.
It is worth noting that it is Noah (not YHVH) who curses Canaan. He does not curse Ham or the descendants of Canaan. The historical use of the "curse of Ham" to justify slavery is absurd nonsense.
Also, according to the Bible, Noah had three sons, not four. Canaan was Noah's grandson.
Although what you meant might be clear to readers who are deeply familiar with your work, I think that your presentation of things risks misleading your readers.
If you look at some of the episodes where I quote that Bible passage on Noah, you'll see that the account conflicts within itself--sometimes Canaan is presented as Noah's son and sometimes as Ham's. From Josephus, the descendants of Ham are Egypt, Africa and part of Asia.
Noah falls asleep drunk and naked (and why is he naked and what does Canaan have to do with that, since it's Ham who sees?) Since Japheth and Shem walk in backwards to cover him with a cloth, presumably he sleeps it off before he makes his will and heir known.
If Noah's just a random person flinging drunken curses, why is he in the Bible? The whole genealogy of the right to rule goes back through Shem. You can trace Jesus back to Shem to Noah to Adam to god. Presumably, according to the story, they're the only living people on earth, yes? So the inheritance over the brothers is supposed to be rule over the world. The patriarchs speak for Yahweh, that's the overarching premise of the Torah.
"Don't follow leaders/Watch your parking meters." I think everyone is insane and there is blood on all hands. Every lineage from whomever the first humans were has murderers, rapists, adulterers, saints (oh yes!), and mostly sinners. It's a miracle there are any humans alive at all. "Unwinding" the past...to what end? We repeat ad infinitum the same fallacies century after century. If you are alive and escape the fray you are indeed blessed (if that's a real thing). In reality...watch out for Islam who will spare no one. Those left alive will wallow in bitterness as we have for all of history.
They went in big on Napoleon and learned to never bet on one horse! Back to the article, if you really had a magic amulet, you would never have to work both sides of the deal! Their magic power is, as I can discern, intense, merciless and unrelenting concentration on the one thing! Profits!
Oh I never said that I thought their success was due to a Hebrew amulet. But I suspect they do, along with the rituals of child rape and sacrifice that the bloodthirsty god Set requires. The Torah says that the child who opens the womb will be 'dedicated' to god. As the story of Isaac shows, 'dedicated' means sacrificed.
I agree with you, Henry, that their success is due to merciless and unrelenting concentration. But I'd say it goes beyond profits. They already own all the homes and property and labor because they create the money backed by the mortgages. I think there is a twisted occult motive that they think will make them gods. That's why the fire sacrifice of Dresden or Lahaina was done. It's not just about the money, imo.
Really interesting! Are you familiar with Michael Hoffman's stuff? I really enjoy Nevermore.and consider Graeber's book the Dawn of Everything to be really helpful, as well as Robert Lawlor's stuff....and Steiners analysis if how Germany was set up in WW! to be in accord with your perceptions.
Thank you, Daniel! Tell me more about Michael Hoffman, the name doesn't ring a bell.
Yes, Crow and I have been conversing on Graeber's death. He makes a convincing case it's suspicious. I did this one it, and these on the DoE:
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/david-graeber-fowl-play
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/when-mothers-ran-the-world
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/muskrat-love-and-anarchy
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/sex-and-power-battle-of-the-daves
My book builds on the foundation of David's work in Debt. I tried hard to get a copy to him but, alas, that's never to be. I don't know Robert Lawlor but yes, I've found Steiner really interesting. I have his two volumes on The Karma of Unknowing, thanks to a comment on a previous episode where Michael Fuller wrote:
"I am particularly struck and delighted (strange quality, I know), that you and Michael Hudson point out the fact that the US and the West have spent most of their waking lives since 1900 trying to destroy Germany. This resonates with the deeper thought from Rudolf Steiner that the reason they do this is to prevent Germany and Russia form working together into the future to help bring about a more spiritual, more brotherly epoch. ( I'm sorry this is so shorthand - please ask if you want specific details of Steiner's ideas [ 6,000 lectures, 50 books])
"However, in a nutshell he suggests that for this kind, brotherly, earth-respecting spiritual impulse to succeed, it will need those of us in the West who can see through the mind-games of the Western military industrial complex to inwardly and outwardly support the idea of this Middle Europe/Slavic future epoch. This means, amongst much else, looking within ourselves and allowing kindness, humility and openness to grow, qualities which you reference beautifully at the end of the essay when you speak of the film."
I need to go back and read more Steiner! Thanks for reminding me of him.
Michael Hoffman runs "Revisionist History:" and wrote a really valuable book called "twilight Language" and introduced the concept of "Revelation of the method"...also a book on usury and debt that is much aligned with David's essential book on debt. Robert Lawlor wrote "Visions of the First Day" and spent most of his life living with the Dravidians in India and the aboriginals of Australia, all matrist, and makes the claim that patriarchy can only happen in Kali Yuga. Steiner's essays about the Rhodsian Anglo-American urgency to separate Germany and Russia is quite remarkable. Thanks for your work.
Ah, that makes sense. I've been hesitant to use the term Revisionist History for what I'm doing. It makes it seem like we're revising history, when it's actually the reverse. History has already been revised and we're correcting it--so I called my playlist on YT Corrected History.
Yes, someone just mentioned 'revelation of the method' to me. I don't know if Hoffman comes to the same conclusion but I have a theory on why. In the superstition of the Set cult, the sacrifice is only worthy if the victim is willing. So they need to warn us, in coded language, so that we have a chance to figure it out and refuse. When we use their language, with its hidden hexes, it shows that we've acquiesced to our own sacrifice.
Thanks for all the good recommendations! My Amazon cart overfloweth!
Makes complete sense to me.
Yes Hoffman is on here he’s old school and about the revelation of the method like in psyops and movies they tell us what we are doing
A great read. You might find this book/review interesting:
https://winteroak.org.uk/2025/05/08/adolf-hitler-and-the-zio-imperialist-mafia/
Oh! And Paul Cudenec was the other person with Mees who was plotting the May 8th Declaration. I only dropped his name from the video because I was afraid I was going to mispronounce it. But it's been great to communicate with him, and he liked the WW2ruth name. He also thought getting everyone to agree on the wording for a Declaration (since the three of us was hard enough) seemed daunting. Thanks for pointing me to his essay!
Wow! I like Cudenec's work at Winter Oak a lot.
I'm loving it just from the title alone! Thanks, Howard.
I have the first MacGregor WW1 book on my "unread bookshelf." William Engdahl has also gone deep in this area. (i.e. "The Gods of Money.")
I'm about a third of the way through "Hitler's War", up to the beginning of the attack on Russia. The book does describe some efforts by the Germans to expel Jews. The idea was to deport them to their home countries, like Poland. But these countries, including Poland, refused to take the expelled Jews. (That has some interesting parallels with what's been happening in Palestine lately.) In one instance, the Germans put Polish Jews on trains and sent them over the Polish border.
Another interesting incident is the one known as Kristallnacht. Hitler kept insisting to his underlings that he didn't want Jews to be harmed; he was particularly fond of a well-known department store run by Jews. But Goebbels seemed to have ignored the Boss's instructions and instigated a fair amount of violence. Hitler was appalled afterwards when he found out, but didn't do much about it and let it slide.
But mostly the book covers Hitler's thoughts and actions as he proceeded with his various wars, using original writings (such as diaries) from his underlings. There's very little so far about the Jews, other than the two things I mentioned above. Maybe because that's not the focus of the book, or maybe more happened in that area after Jan. 1941 that I haven't seen yet.
I'm really glad you're reading that dense tome, Mark, so I can get my information from you. I remember reading that Goebbels had a mistress, an actress from another country. Hitler was friends with Goebbels' wife and disapproved of his affair. Goebbels enacted Kristallnacht as a bid to replace Hitler, responding to popular sentiment. Hitler's reluctance to take any action against the Jews was not popular--he was under pressure to do more. Remember, it was because of the Ashkenazis that Germany was crushed and betrayed after they had acted honorably in the Great War. We may not have known about the Balfour Declaration but they certainly did.
On the one hand, you have the concept of religious freedom, which sounds fine and dandy. Anyone against that would be a horrible bigot, right? And then you have a religion of racial supremacy that says anything done to the outsider for the benefit of the group is approved by god. So you have the Kol Nidre, the prayer of asking forgiveness a year in advance for lying. And you have early American courts saying they don't know how to deal with the Jewish immigrants because being under oath means nothing to them. The statistical instances of fraud speak for themselves.
It's why I think the Torah, which anyone with a Bible in their home can verify, is such an important document. It shows that the morality, ethics and honor of the religion is inverted--what we would consider awful is beloved by god. So do you respect a religion that doesn't respect other people? That's the dilemma we've been put in.
I think there's no similarity between the countries that don't want to take in Palestinians--so Israel can ethnically cleanse the land and foist them on other Arab nations--and the home countries of Ashkenazis who refused to take them back. It's the exact opposite. Palestine is the home country of Palestinians. Whereas Germany wanted to send back Polish Yahwists for the same reason Poland evicted them--following the precepts of a sociopathic god. It's the behavior, not the people, that was rejected by 170 countries.
Interesting that you should mention the Torah. My mother, although an Episcopalian, has been for many years in a Torah class run by the local synagogue. I asked her in a recent email if the rabbis who teach the class believe in the stories about their god killing millions of people. (I mentioned the Elisha/42 dead kids story and she hadn't heard of it.) She said, no, the rabbis are Reform and don't believe in the literal truth of the writings. My mom doesn't believe in all of the New Testament stories either.
I'm not sure what this all means; it's just something I noticed.
Kit Klarenberg, possibly a jewish surmame, is one of the best writers around. He recently delivered an article about How Hitler was utilized by the anglo-saxons. https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/the-anglo-nazi-global-empire-that
We could debate for hours about the subject, meaning the issue is alive and full of noise and confusion. Today, 9th May marks the 80th aniversary of the Red Army victory on nazi Germany. As Zukhov said: They will never forgive us for defeating fascism. Nobody, with the exception of Emmanuel Todd, could predict the URSS would collapse so suddenly and catastrophically.
Even if the combined net zero, pandemic, cbdc, transhuman megaplan for a global reset and a new world monopoly steered by London anglosionists (Rothschilds?) seems to tank, we better learn some lessons or we are toast.
Thanks for that recommendation, Yoni! I like the idea that the issue is alive and full of noise and confusion. Much better than the truth being dead, buried and silent!
I meant the USSR.
Holy crap!
Benjamin Freedman's speech explains a lot that I just couldn't understand.
The difference now is that the U.S. doesn't really require any other allies to continue the work in Palestine. Trillion dollar defense budgets and 800 worldwide military bases somewhat ensures our abilities.
And an unwitting populace that is either financially complicit or afraid of threat to reel in the fleecing of our tax money to continue supporting the Zionist agenda.
Every single one of our politicians who takes AIPAC money is corrupted. And the Kol Nidre sanctifies the lies and cheating.
Just wow! I had no idea.
Yes!!! If there was only one document that I would say everyone should read on this subject, it's Freedman's speech. How can I have gone 66 yrs without knowing about it?
I'm not sure about the US and its power. Ukraine depleted all the weapons stock. The Great Contraction is happening in employment, so funds are going down even with the ones taken from gov't services ala the AI Doge. Can the US get the material it needs to make more? And then you have to factor in the competence of the MIC. Most of what they produce are overpriced pieces of junk.
Russia's 'hazelnut' oreshniks, I think they're called, are far, far superior to anything the US has. Sure Israel and the US have nukes, but they can't use them without hitting Israel too. So I wouldn't say those trillion dollar defense budgets and 800 military bases predict anything. I agree with the title of Fadi's book on "Why the West Can't Win."
And whether the West can win or not is immaterial to me.
What I want to know is how to wrestle our minds and our freedom back from these corrupt and immoral usurpers that have taken over our country.
Thank you, Tereza, for this declaration and mind blowing resource!
Tereza, Your research & writing are amazing. The Zion oligarch & cabal have been committing murder in nations through such as the False Arab Spring & US aggression wars now, killing on average >1 million people per year = 80 million killed since WW2. You need to publicly provide indoctrinated dissenters with Chauvinist tendencies, with an intelligent way & methodology to challenge what your are saying. You can set up a list of criterial to engage you publicly in published debate. Such criteria, if you receive a number of challengers, is to have them debate among themselves & choose a Spokesperson. In any case we take the emphasis off of any published material as being sacrosanct & put create a field of intelligent exchange. Here's the method I offer in my writing. it will be interesting to see how you go about such exchange.
COMMUNICATE formally through COUNCIL PROCESS for creating Constructive Agreements & for Conflict Resolution. Https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/d-participatory-structure/1-both-sides-now-equal-time-recorded-dialogues
Thank you so much, Douglas. Like you, I've given a lot of thought to how to have arguments, which is what I call a productive disagreement. First, like the person you're arguing with. Second, state the question. Third, define the terms. Fourth, say why it matters. Fifth, brainstorm all possible answers. Sixth, weigh the pros and cons of each.
I might say that the overarching question is 'Have we been lied to about the history of the world wars?' If there's even one thing that's been presented as absolute truth that we know to be a lie, then everything else has to be open to question. You can't say, 'Oh, they wouldn't lie about that.' We already know they would.
I'm just a housewife trying to figure things out for my own benefit. These are my best guesses, based on my research. The best 'arguments' are with other people trying to do the same, like you, Douglas. I think you and I both feel that it doesn't take convincing people in order to change the mind-set of the world. Two people coming to a new place changes everything. I know our conversations have already changed the world.
Yes, we were lied to about the WWs and their motivations. Where we start the deception whether 500 or 800 years ago or even 2000 or 5000 years ago is up for debate. I say we start with the inception of the USA and the intention to weaponize our currency since it{s tangible yet greatly misunderstood. Let's keep in mind we see the world through filters that create reality, which may or may or may not be more fluid than we realize.
Agreed on the weaponization of the currency! I write about that in my book, in this chapter: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/05-the-short-eventful-life-of-sovereign money. And you might like this one: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-constitution-coup. And this goes into the creation of the so-called Federal Reserve: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/07-the-incomplete-revolution.
https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory.wordpress.com/about/ here's some information about WWI. About a decade ago, I watched a Summer's worth of films about WWI at the AFI in Silver Spring, MD. The reasons given for WWI are incoherent and well, silly.
Oh you're not too far from my hometown in Cumberland MD.
Excellent resource! One of my co-conspirators on the WW2ruth Liberation Day is Paul Cudenac, who posted a review of Macgregor and John O'Dowd's recent book: https://winteroak.org.uk/2025/05/08/adolf-hitler-and-the-zio-imperialist-mafia. I thought I read that Gerry has died.
In my comment, I disagreed that Hitler was duped--I suspect he was complicit with the Rothschilds. But their research is impeccable.
Incoherent and silly puts it well. I can't believe I fell for the 'assassination of an archduke story' for so long. Thanks, Marcella.
FYI, Any search engine reveals NAZI is the acronym for the National Socialist Workers Party.
"I'm just a housewife trying to figure things out for my own benefit."
And thank you for that, Tereza - giving housewives a good name.
Yes indeed, that's definitely my objective. Thank you my fellow intrepid housewife!
On the origin of violence ? Neuroscientist James W Prescott published an article about such. You can still find it on the internet.
http://www.violence.de
http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html
Ok...
Thanks for that karen. Very interesting!
It’s about time people learned it was to destroy Germany by the blood line illuminati …. David Livinstone has 6 books on this ordo a chao something like that…..
No David… I’ll find his website but William Ramsey just interviewed him on Spotify and you can check it out
Agreed. The targets seem to be all the places that expelled the cult of Set: Russia, Germany and especially Canaan. Is this who you mean? https://livingstoneonline.org/life-and-times/livingstone-s-life-expeditions.
"WW2ruthers" excellent idea:
Since the impact of WWII on global politics, economics, financial and monetary systems persists till today, it is essential that the truth all the truth and nothing but the truth about all events from the 1919 Versailles Peace Conference to 1950 have to be clarified.
Furthermore the kid brainwashing in western nations that has been ongoing for over 50 years has had a highly detrimental effect on the psyche of people in the west and forms the basis for justifying the ongoing genocide committed by the Zionists since 1947.
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/forgiving-hitler
Quote: "a supposed ‘final solution’ in Germany, that somehow increased the census number of Jews worldwide, justifies the actual final solution of the massacre of Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Iranians, Iraqis and Yemenis. These are to create Greater Israel that happens to match the borders of ancient Canaan."
>> as noted in comment above
Quotes:
"3,000,000 in Russia, 750,000 in France, 400,000 in Britain and 10,000 in Belgium"
"in the years immediately after the end of WWII, there were 5.7M excess deaths for Germans"
>> Thank you for enlightening us, despite avid reading, I had never heard about this before reading your substack.
Quote: "Nomadic bands of men called the Habiru were given the right to rape, kill, pillage and claim the virgins for themselves. In exchange, they obeyed the Heka Khasut, the Aryan ruling caste who spoke for the male god Set. In the Torah he becomes Yahweh but the techniques of terror, taxation and word tricks are the same."
>> Never stopped, did it?
Quote: "I thought it would be easier to train cats to do synchronized swimming than to get WW2ruthers to agree on a declaration"
lol lol lol
Haha, I thought of you Fadi with the synchronized swimming cats ;-) I always know you'll get and appreciate my jokes and I can't stop snickering picturing that one.
I hope other people pick up that WW2ruth label. I think it's much less clumsy than 'revisionist history.'
I think it was the Merlin Stone book where she described the borders of Canaan and I realized that's what 'Greater Israel' is aiming for.
I owe Nefahotep for those stats on post-war Germany. I find the enslavement in foreign countries more shocking than the deaths. I can't even imagine 3M Germans being taken to Russia as slaves. Domestic slaves? Industrial? Mining? These had to be women and children, the men had already been killed. Factory barracks? I want more information on this, as much as I dread it. I'd say it seems so primitive but the more I'm finding out about primitive times, the more sensible they seem by comparison.
I saw your kind compliment regarding my esaay on unz, which is also published on The Occidental Observer, as well as my own publication.
Those interested can read it here:
https://theravenscall.substack.com/p/finis-germania-reflections-on-the
Richard, I'm so happy that you saw my comment and came here, and that you provided the direct link to your stack. Subbed! I find the format of Substack's comment threads much more convivial for real conversation. Unz sometimes gets the same people commenting everywhere, just to be clever and one-up each other. Although the caliber of readership is unparalleled, and I'm always delighted when I can lure someone to my stack from there.
Eager to dig into your article!
The unz comments section convinces me that the left are right about comment moderation, they are just wrong about what should be moderated.
This essay is the same you praised recently. It is more or less an addendum of "Denouncing HItler for Diffferent Reasons," which angered both mainstream conservatives and HItler idolators. That essay is found both on unz and TOO, but my substack as well. Should be easily found in top posts or a search, or just look in the section "Core Texts."
739 comments on Denouncing Hitler for Different Reasons! I'm even more touched that you read and remember mine.
Very funny about the left and comment moderation! I adhere to a strict policy on my stack that I don't allow insults to groups or individuals, including myself, but any ideas or positions are welcome. Because I discuss such controversial ideas, it would make it easy to discredit the whole if cheap shots were allowed. Plus, I feel it's like a dinner party in my home. That one rule would wipe out a number of Unz commenters ;-)
And thank you for subbing me! Yours is the most discerning list I've made since Laurent Guyenot's, who has even fewer subs he reads than you ;-)
James DeMeo published a book about the invasion of the Fertile Crescent 4000 BCE
by warmongering nomadic tribes in:
SAHARASIA. The 4000BCE Origins Of Child Abuse, Sex-Repression, Warfare, And Social Violence In The Deserts Of The Old World.
I have it ordered, should be here next week. Curiously, someone on Crow's comment thread also recommended it: https://nevermoremedia.substack.com/p/who-were-the-aryans/comment/115871931.
We've been having a lively debate over the origins of the patriarchal culture of violence there: https://nevermoremedia.substack.com/p/who-were-the-aryans/comment/115980019.
Oh that sounds REALLY interesting, karen. Thanks for telling me about that!
You're Welcome.
I should have included:
http://www.saharasia.org
Whaaat?! 🤦🏽♂️
"I’m still not clear if Hitler was instrumental to this success or if he was sent as an agent of the Rothschilds to sabotage it."
This is one of those issues that the jews keep active. Question Hitler's real motivations.
It is clear in my mind that Hitler was real and right. He was no agent of the Rothschilds. And he certainly did not sabotage his own people.
Good article.
Pardon me, BMR, if I don't take 'clear in your mind' as absolute proof. It's definitely not an issue that would serve the 'Jews' to suspect that Hitler worked for the Rothschilds, against the interest of the German people. It would draw more attention to the Transfer Agreement that made 'Israel' possible and why 'Israelis' want to erect a statue to him there. It casts tremendous doubt on the holocaust narrative and why 60% of inmates in Dachau were Catholic. It gives credibility that the true 'Nazis' were the Zionists, as they certainly have been in Ukraine. From my research, they wanted to force 'Jews' to populate Palestine and so did the false flag pogroms in Russia and elsewhere. And perhaps they orchestrated Kristallnacht too. It certainly served their efforts, both in presenting the holders of German wealth as victims and convincing those wealthy Jewish-Germans to take their money--thanks to Hitler's Transfer Agreement--and build 'Israel.'
Neither side of this disagreement serves the mainstream narrative/ psyop of the 'Jews' as victims (I keep putting that in quotes because it's another word trick). It's therefore a useful debate to have.
Hi Tereza, I don’t know much about WWII except that the Nazi symbol looks awfully a lot like the Indian spiritual symbol I grew up with and saw all over temples and sacred sites around India. So I appreciate how much research you’ve done, all your past videos you’ve linked, and your comments in response to readers.
I was wondering if you happen to have read a book called “A history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind?” https://ia601703.us.archive.org/26/items/a-history-of-central-banking-and-the-enslavement-of-mankind-pdfdrive/A_History_of_Central_Banking_and_the_Enslavement_of_Mankind__PDFDrive_.pdf
I happened across it as I was trying to learn more about central banking and that was the first time I had seen the economic/financial policies of Hitler portrayed in a wholly positive light. Written by Stephen Mitford Goodson, former Director of the South African Reserve Bank (!) Not sure if it’s a reliable source since thought to ask what you thought of it
Hi, LoWa. And yes! Somewhere in the comment threads of those episodes, someone makes that same point and gives links and references that the svastika is an ancient symbol of good fortune: Sanskrit svastika, from svasti well-being, from su- well + as- to be; akin to Sanskrit asti he is, Old English is; from its being regarded as a good luck symbol.
But now, knowing that Sanskrit was imported to India as the ritual language of the Hexing Set Cult, who wrote the patriarchal and colorist Vedas, I have to think of the implications. Doesn't that seem like a tell that it's the same people? Not the Germans at all but the Rothschilds. Interesting clue!
I haven't seen the Goodson book before but it looks very interesting. I see the picture of Qaddafi but I wonder if he talks about Laurent Gbagbo, who was the real genius behind the Pan-African dinar, as I wrote about in my Libya chapter:
"Muammar Qaddafi and Laurent Gbagbo, President of Cote d’Ivoire, to create a Pan-African dinar backed by the gold held by Libya. The Pan-African dinar could have been used for intra-continental trade and would have enabled Africa to control its own development. To this end, Qaddafi had created the African Investment Bank in Sirte and the African Monetary Fund in Camaroon. The AMF would have circumvented the IMF, and the AIB would have displaced the BIS.
"But deprived of the profits from African oil, the franc would have sunk like a capsized Titanic. And without a monopoly as the world’s oil currency, US dollars would be flushed out into the market so fast they’d leave a vapor trail. This may explain why a NATO air strike and a French bullet conspired to end Qaddafi’s life. Both the US and France had plenty to lose, as far as the bankers were concerned."
I learned about the Feder plan, which is what Hitler implemented, from Ellen Brown in Web of Debt. But I still think that Ben Franklin is the least controversial example--who can demean him?
Very helpful, thanks for all these leads! No, Goodson’s book doesn’t mention Gbagbo (if I recall correctly) so this is super interesting to discover! I can wait to check out Web of Debt too.
And yes, gosh, the history of India really is so tangly, I had never thought of the hexing set cult before reading your work. I think into the 90’s there were still some distant pagan tribes in India relatively untouched by development (Enna Reitort mentions this in podcasts about Krivda) so perhaps there are clues there of what spirituality in India used to be before Brahminism/Vedas/Hinduism.
PS here’s the audio of Goodson’s book (with images ha) if you prefer to listen than read! https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZ7GdlPK75_tXJYVzkCId2SYEjBLjnU9E
No, Ma'am, it doesn't serve jews but sews doubt used by them to peel away undecided and keep conflict among their distracted. The old divide and conquer.
I think that Hitler was true to his word. I'm sure that Irving would believe so (having read a good bit from him).
There are many on this stack who agree with you. Notably, Julius Skoolafish who may be the best-read of my readers. He makes a very compelling case and has sent some resources I've watched that leave me convinced ... until I read some other sources, and then I'll be convinced the other way. I think there's a valid case to be made in either direction.
But 100% of the people who think the extermination of six million 'Jews' was real believe that Hitler was serving the interests of the German people, yes? So those two beliefs are entirely compatible and strengthen the victim narrative for why Israel must exist because every other country has irrational homicidal intents toward the 'Jews'.
If the 'owner' of Israel, Rothschild, put Hitler in power to defeat Germany from within, it makes it impossible that the holocaust narrative could be true. Rothschild would not have killed six million Jews through his agent, Hitler. In order to consider that possibility, which would make the AshkeNazis the perpetrators and not the victims, you need to first conclude the holocaust narrative is false. We are in agreement about that, yes? If you want to be divided among the very few of us that realize that as a fact, because I question whether Germany's defeat was betrayal from within once again, that's on you, not me.
I know Julius from before here (I think we both read at Winter Watch). Yes, we basically agree on most regarding this issue from what I remember. I think Russ at Winter Watch espouses the same theory as you, basically.
But don't get me wrong, although that was the only point I focused on, it isn't really important to me because what we are experiencing right now isn't exactly related (nor do we have enough homogeneity in America to make such a movement work here).
We do agree that the hoax is basically 100% invented hogwash built around a work camp system. However, I doubt that Rothschid or any of them would blink at killing people for whatever goal they have (I just don't think that Hitler was a tool used in that goal). Did Hitler make mistakes that played into their hands? Absolutely.
Carolyn Yeager is another who would likely disagree with the Hitler betrayed Germany for Rothschilds theory.
Please understand that I very much appreciate your stack and your work (I just haven't commented before now).
Yes, I think you're right that Julius reads Winter Watch. I'm sure he'll be weighing in before long but, being in Australia, it might be night for him. I appreciate you telling me that you've been reading and liking my stack.
To me, the question isn't whether Hitler was a Rothschild agent, but whether that question is legit or another psyop that serves the Zionist agenda. My argument is that asking the question gives more legitimacy to questioning the world war narrative, including the holocaust.
Those who question the holocaust narrative are generally presented as pro-Hitler--as you and Julius are, and from the speeches, policies and writings I've read, I would agree with you. However, we know the brilliant economic plan was Gottfried Feder. And that Hitler was an actor and certainly capable of reading someone else's script. My theory gives more credit to the Nat'l Soc party, that it was a collective full of people with good ideas, not just one man.
I find the circumstances of Hitler's death suspicious. Too calm, like it was any other day. And the mistakes he made militarily, and that he didn't delegate authority but also didn't allow anyone to wake him before noon. And invading Russia in winter--who does that? I do think it's worth reading both sides, with the other taken from Nefahotep, who got it from Firestarter: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/my-hitler-journey.
But no one who thinks he betrayed Germany for Rothschild can be accused of being a Hitler fan. Without Hitler, would Germany have won the war and protected their own sovereignty, creating an economic model that would have brought down the Rothschild banking system?
I think it's a worthy question, no matter what the answer is.
I am truly befuddled by some of your claims. The Pharaohs were Aryan? That's news to me... do you have any proof of that?
"The Cult of Set started with the largest division possible, making men superior to women and using atrocity to destroy the Goddess societies that made the Era Before Common all flourish. Adam put an end to that. Then the races were divided into four with Noah’s sons: Shem, Japheth, Ham and tiny little Canaan. The race of Shem was given rule over all the others, with descendants of Ham and Canaan to be their slaves. Fortunately, the other races didn’t listen."
Who says that the race of Shem was given rule over the others? I'm confused... and I'm sure I'm not alone.
Hi, Crow. Although I'm sure you're not alone, no one who's read my episodes on the Torah would question who gave the race of Shem rule over the others--Yahweh. Here's my first one that quotes the story of Noah past the rainbow: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-devil-and-naomi-wolf and here are others:
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-curse-of-babel
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-genesis-of-the-dysfunctional
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/talmud-tricks-and-torah-curses
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/genesis-and-the-naked-deception
We're on the same side, right, for sovereignty and against empire, the rule of some over others. It feels like you're being adversarial, asking for 'proof' rather than two people comparing research.
The piece I did on Irish Pharaohs was here: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/a-royal-flush-and-irish-pharaohs. Interestingly, Merlin writes about red-headed men being sacrificed annually at the burial site of Osiris, which may add credibility to that.
The Heka Khasut were a different race than the Habiru. Egyptian paintings show men with red hair. The word Pharaoh didn't exist before the cult of Set. It was Par-O, the household of the priestesses. Nefahotep writes about that also.
I'm looking forward to reading your piece on the Aryans because I don't know where they came from and whether they're different than the Luvians from Anatolia, who are my best guess for the northern invaders. But I don't need you to prove anything to me. I'm just happy for your knowledge and clues about what really happened and who did what.
We certainly are on the same side, so I apologize if my post came off as adversarial... I think that the work you are doing in challenging the WWII is important... but you seem to be mixing in some highly debatable theories about ancient history, which I don't think strengthens your case.
I don't know that much about ancient Egypt, but I am an archaeology buff. If I can't follow your arguments, I'm sure there are a lot of people who are in the same boat.
But maybe I just haven't explored your work enough. Let me look into some of your claims a bit more and get back to you.
The theories I present are my own, Crow. Were I to abandon them in order to convince someone of someone else's theories that are less controversial, I'm not sure why I'd bother to write. I should just repost other people.
My overall premise is that people are ALL inherently good and, when they behave badly, systems and stories are to blame. The primary system that makes good people do bad things is economics. The primary story that makes good people do bad things are the religions of superiority.
You've made a decision to believe in the story of Jesus, which is built on the Torah. That choice means that anything that conflicts with your decision has to be rejected. I respect your choice but I think you should speak for yourself and not others when you say you can't follow my arguments--which lead to a place you've decided not to go.
I guess the other thing is that your readers might be left with the impression that the Bible condones the rule of the sons of Shem over the sons of Japheth and Ham. It doesn't.
Noah does curse Canaan (not Ham) whilst drunk, and this is a strange and controversial passage that is open to various interpretations.
It is worth noting that it is Noah (not YHVH) who curses Canaan. He does not curse Ham or the descendants of Canaan. The historical use of the "curse of Ham" to justify slavery is absurd nonsense.
Also, according to the Bible, Noah had three sons, not four. Canaan was Noah's grandson.
Although what you meant might be clear to readers who are deeply familiar with your work, I think that your presentation of things risks misleading your readers.
If you look at some of the episodes where I quote that Bible passage on Noah, you'll see that the account conflicts within itself--sometimes Canaan is presented as Noah's son and sometimes as Ham's. From Josephus, the descendants of Ham are Egypt, Africa and part of Asia.
Noah falls asleep drunk and naked (and why is he naked and what does Canaan have to do with that, since it's Ham who sees?) Since Japheth and Shem walk in backwards to cover him with a cloth, presumably he sleeps it off before he makes his will and heir known.
If Noah's just a random person flinging drunken curses, why is he in the Bible? The whole genealogy of the right to rule goes back through Shem. You can trace Jesus back to Shem to Noah to Adam to god. Presumably, according to the story, they're the only living people on earth, yes? So the inheritance over the brothers is supposed to be rule over the world. The patriarchs speak for Yahweh, that's the overarching premise of the Torah.
"Don't follow leaders/Watch your parking meters." I think everyone is insane and there is blood on all hands. Every lineage from whomever the first humans were has murderers, rapists, adulterers, saints (oh yes!), and mostly sinners. It's a miracle there are any humans alive at all. "Unwinding" the past...to what end? We repeat ad infinitum the same fallacies century after century. If you are alive and escape the fray you are indeed blessed (if that's a real thing). In reality...watch out for Islam who will spare no one. Those left alive will wallow in bitterness as we have for all of history.
Facing huge losses, Rothschild risked it all and bought bonds after napoleons defeat at Waterloo! Poker, not amulets, my dear!
Yes, Rothschild's hagiographer says the same. Glad that you're enjoying the state of the world and have no criticism of how it got that way, my dear.
The Rothschilds funded both sides of the war both the French and the British. All wars are Bankers' Wars.
They went in big on Napoleon and learned to never bet on one horse! Back to the article, if you really had a magic amulet, you would never have to work both sides of the deal! Their magic power is, as I can discern, intense, merciless and unrelenting concentration on the one thing! Profits!
Oh I never said that I thought their success was due to a Hebrew amulet. But I suspect they do, along with the rituals of child rape and sacrifice that the bloodthirsty god Set requires. The Torah says that the child who opens the womb will be 'dedicated' to god. As the story of Isaac shows, 'dedicated' means sacrificed.
I agree with you, Henry, that their success is due to merciless and unrelenting concentration. But I'd say it goes beyond profits. They already own all the homes and property and labor because they create the money backed by the mortgages. I think there is a twisted occult motive that they think will make them gods. That's why the fire sacrifice of Dresden or Lahaina was done. It's not just about the money, imo.