This is an absolutely excellent post, Tereza you covered many aspects of the Parasitic Elites; who are likely related to the Habiru, originally. They were the Name Stealers who hijacked language, to control the concept of God and Money. To keep this power, they provided "solutions" for the "problems" they created. I cross posted.
You totally nailed it on the 5 Rules, which are the same patterns of Infiltration seen in many facets of the system we are living in.
First the words, then the world -- Steal Names and Hijack Language infiltrate communities, if you can trap Meaning within Definitions, then you can control the Cultural Symbols.
Create a god in your own image -- Create a psychological attachment to Hierarchy, make God only available to those who subscribe to the Re Legion
Coin the realm to own it -- Sever true treasure which is our personal capital, with a Symbol called Money. If you can trap the value of something inside a symbol, then make it scarce you can Control it. and the people who use it.
Create chaos; divide to conquer -- Terror and War are tools for building Empire. They are also tools to gain consent to be governed.
Impose ‘solutions’ to problems you cause -- Problem -- Reaction -- Solution.
Also:
I thought that it was worth reposting this comment from Tereza's previous post: MMT & Home Economics; I had responded to Tirion in regards to "The Great Taking." It shows an important part of the puzzle in comprehending the Economic System we are in. It's discussion is centered on "Trusts."
In the above post, I also reference most of my source info on how the Trust System is really at the core of Monetary Policies, Government Policies, Corporate Control of Equities, Land Ownership, how the Corporate Government is ruling from behind a curtain, while most people are fooled into accepting the Government as a Republic. There are many dimensions to this. In this post, I referenced another substack; that corroborates the items in my post: https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law by American Hypnotist.
There is a commenter in American Hypnotist's post that everyone should read. He goes by "Bitter Root Services" I think the comment approximately half way down, he describes "why" the whole Globalist, Centralized System seems to keep going and why the Power to "control" something is seemingly more attractive than "owning" something. Trust are like Russian nesting dolls. Trust can exist inside of Trusts, inside of Trust, inside of.... well you get the idea.
In my post, Corporate Chains of Custody there is a diagram of approximately how this looks, a picture is worth a thousand words.
And after I actually went to that comment section, I found that Tereza and Bitter Root had a most wonderful exchange; important and informative enough that I'm printing it out; I wish I had gone to check it out before. Here is a direct link to the comment section, if you would like to check it out; I hope you will. ;-)
I'm at my daughter's so was waiting until this morning when I could respond to your multilayered comment, Nef. First, you're reading my book! What a lovely surprise. I was intending to bring you a copy next time I was in your town but you've leapfrogged that intent. (Again, on words, I was about to put 'beaten me to it' but why is the violent image of beating part of our everyday friendly language?)
Thank you for cross-posting this! That's very kind of you. And yes, infiltration rather than military conquest, much more efficient. It's certainly the nomadic peoples who were the first Yews or Ewes, as I'm coming to think of them. Not one tribe or race but a style of roaming people who could be herded by a 'shepherd'. In one of the ancient texts, it was mentioned that the herdsmen were feared. The tribes themselves have always been Used, imo.
I'm not sure whether definition is the problem or our solution. I think they shift the definitions and truncate the words away from them, so we use words with imprecise meanings often contrary to our intent, sending subliminal images of violence in casual conversation, as I almost did above.
Very true on god, coins and chaos as all leading us into their hierarchy or hieros archons, 'holy rulers' or divinely-appointed. And it's not just making the money scarce but also making us dependent on it for taxes. But you already know that from my book. Yay!
I would be so delighted to have an autographed copy of your book, that would make my day, I would love it. I left an analytical description of language evolution for Mark, above.
And no, I would never want "Beat anyone" to anything HA ha ha ;-) Let's just say we have synchronicity with each other, I feel so proud to be working along side you on these things. Your writing style is very clear, I am really seeing that in your book, I encourage everyone to read it.
By the way, I'm going to make it a regular thing to cross post your posts, (at least some of them anyway) I don't know why I wasn't thinking about that before. I think of us as on the same team, why not? --- Nef
"Laws of War Video" was so heart wrenching. For this to be intentionally done by anyone against children, while squealing "Antisemitism" as an excuse, makes me wonder how long before something can actually be done to stop them. When killing children becomes normalized, for foolish ideology, that is where Civilization goes to die.
These were the same Zionist who Fashioned Nazis to be oppressors; so they could target and destroy Germany.
Terrific post. I’ve David Webb’s video and the written article that the video is based on in my cue and it has been sitting there for months. You’ve spurred me to finally take a look.
So… Rome was a military post and it had no women? How on earth did I go 45 years without ever knowing that? I knew they were into having sex with young boys, but I thought that was cultural more than the lack of female presence. And the Ashlenazi thread is very interesting too. The male DNA being traced back to Palestine requires my further investigation for sure.
Totally wild how much unlearning I have to do. I love your approach of weaving in and out of the metaphysical and historical and psychological and mythological… hard dot connecting but also flavored with my kind of woo.
Also, is that your backyard and garden? I’m jelly how much space you have and how groomed everything looks. I love my backyard and put a lot of work in it, but in the end, it still looks like a gypsy hippie playground I have to share with the rabbits, squirrels and city rats.
Thank you so much, Tonika. I met with Neshma today and was thinking of you!
I'll be very interesting in your take on David. I liked him a lot and he's very smart with lots of great information and insights. I really could have done a long presentation on his video but it's already succinct and to the point.
And on Rome, right? It was totally by accident I found this out when I did this one: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-anti-matri-male. While looking at John Carter's series under the Tonic Masculinity title he stole from me, I read about The Rape of the Sabines: "After the foundation of Rome, the city was primarily inhabited by young warriors, bandits, and adventurers who flocked to what would become the Eternal City. These men had no wives, and none were to be found, and one can only imagine that this was leading to dissatisfaction and discord, to say nothing of the obvious problem of sustaining the city’s population beyond a single generation. The Romans tried negotiating with the surrounding peoples, but none would part with their daughters. So Rome decided to take them. Romulus threw a party, holding games and a feast, to which he invited the surrounding tribes. When all were good and drunk his soldiers abducted their daughters and fought back their fathers and brothers. This was the infamous Rape of the Sabine Women."
The story continues that, after some years and Rome conquering other cities, they finally clashed with the Sabines and fathers of their rapees. But the women threw themselves between their husbands and fathers, imploring the latter to just give up and let Sabinum become Roman rather than kill their 'husbands'. I call bullshit. Here's his article, this part's further down: https://barsoom.substack.com/p/pixel-valhalla. John's damn funny.
Glad to be your kind of woo! And yes, and it's filmed from the wedding pagoda I had built for my daughter and doesn't even show the orchard or Coop de Ville. I have a really deep lot because the alleyway ends at my neighbor's garage--so no access but extra space which was a total jungle when I was your age, youngster, and had a 4 yr old, 10 yr old and 12 yr old, yard full of free ranging chickens and bunnies we had to herd and catch to put back in their cages nightly. At one point my grass grew so high it touched the clothesline--deep meadow. Absolutely out of control weeds. What you're seeing now is a woman who got rid of the husband and kids and hired a landscaper, cementing in two patios, dropping in truckloads of mulch, and making a manageable postage-stamp lawn. Think of this as inspiration for your next 22 years! But all that time of chicken and rabbit poop definitely laid the groundwork, so to speak. Another time we'll talk city rats, and how I lost the battle for 15 yrs of chickens, my fellow hippie chick ;-)
So… the Sabine women were just cool with the rape? Is that what you’re calling bullshit? Or they just didn’t want their children to suffer? Trying to put myself in those sandals. How much of culture was shaped my warriors taking what they want and women not having a say, whether it’s to their fathers or their husbands. Glad not to be living in those times. Sheesh! Or maybe we did and we carry the ancestral trauma with us every day. That would explain some things. 🧐
Well, let's start with who's telling the history here, spelling in context. I think it's a total misogynist myth. Never happened--the rape yes, but I would gladly have let my father come in and kill all of the rapists so I could raise my children in a society that didn't do that. Are we to believe that after the kidnapping they gave the women property rights and treated them honorably? Or were they slaves with more privileges?
That's made sense to me of everything that's come since. We may not be raped but have we ever actually known freedom, living in a society formed by women, with children at the center?
The project that Neshma is helping me with is a graphic and extreme reminder of 'no!' Somehow I have a feeling you're going to be part of this project. Don't know how, don't know when, but I think it has your future fingerprints on it.
Oh, my interest is definitely piqued. I love your saying how our society would do best if the children are in the center, cared for by the women, protected by the men on the outer circle. I cite you and the is concept n real life conversations and both men and women alike nod their heads in agreement. Almost as if it’s an innate understanding so we all get it.
Thanks for the history lesson. If you’d allow me an anecdote: Bulgarian lore has it that during the 500 Turkish conquest, they’d steal young maidens from their homes to rape and betroth. To avoid this faith, 40 teenage girls from a seaside village interbraided their long black hair and jumped into the Black Sea together where they perished. There are stories like that in every corner of the world. I still can’t shake the tales from India where young mothers would smother their babes if they were born girls in attempt to spare them the violence they know would be bestowed on them. Women can carry around the female ancestral trauma but I bet men carry it too, having watched their sisters, wives, and daughters suffer such violence. We’ve got so much healing to do.
Heavy, heavy stuff, Tonika. Yes, it's time for the patrix to end. I'm honored to be quoted by you on that, and grateful to hear that there are men who nod in agreement. Thanks for sharing that.
Your landscaper is doing a fine job for you. The tall grass you had means that the soil is very healthy. I was noticing the yard in the video, your fruit trees look well kept. It must rain more often in the area where you are right? So, you probably don't have a drying out problem as we do in San Diego.
Rain depends on what the weather 'gods' decide--drought or drowning. But yes, we've had a couple good years of rain, some of it too good.
And yes, all my years of experimenting with animal husbandry has left me with some good soil. And I'm so happy to get to the point where it's manageable because I really relate to Tonika where things have been so out of control I had to hide my eyes when I went back there. But that deep meadow made for some great Easter egg hunts!
"...put a lot of work in it, but in the end, it still looks like a gypsy hippie playground I have to share with the rabbits, squirrels and city rats."
This made me laugh, cause of part of it is we just can't escape ourselves. I can go out and buy new clothes, but basically they all the same.
I'm sure it's a charming mess and also reflective of a busy mom of young kids. When your times frees up down the line, you'll see. (The gypsy-hippie thing will still be there I bet.)
I had the same reaction - only many more years - how did I never hear about this?!
A benefit of discovering that much of what you thought made up 'reality' was shot full of holes or outright fabricated is that so much is new again! :-)
Oh so true! In theatre we have this thing in the clowning genre, that what makes a truly a hilarious and heartbreaking clown performance so good is that the actor understands that a clown discovers everything anew, like a child. Although having the strength and responsibilities of an adult, the clown sees the world through the eyes of a child and it can be endearing to see the clown navigate situations with hilarious results. It’s why I can never turn around and call some politician or bad guy a clown as an insult. It’s more insulting to the clown, really. Clowns are rarely malicious in intent. And even then it’s because they’re emulating some power structure they saw in the world, consequently bringing our attention to that dysfunction.
Haha. I totally went off on a tangent. It was meant to support your “new reality” feeling but now I dunno if it relates. But on a different note, I’ll take your “charming mess” descriptor because I really need to and bless you for making my hippie soul feel good.
I told my daughter about our exchange and she said that it's a message to moms in the thick of it not to fear the empty nest.
I love the clown analogy, Tonika! That's such a wisdom. It's why I don't refer to global predators, it's an insult to predators, who serve an important purpose. And the function is much more parasitical of an enormous host that's been infiltrated and turned around to serve a tiny invader.
I also used to say, when someone was essentially unparented, that they were raised by wolves. But then I realized that wolf moms have excellent parenting. It's honestly when the mom becomes more like a man, valuing money, prestige, competition and sexual relationships over her children. So it does go back to the bear or man question--some children are raised by men with vaginas, and would have been better off raised by bears.
Yandex, as far as I know (very limited ) is the only search engine where you don’t have a 100% chance of being gaslit.
Does unfortunately seem to be crumbling to a degree (my subjective perception )
But many things that are “unfindable” on Google can be readily, or with improved search statements reasonably found . Keep mind even if you’re using VPNs and/or other services etc you’d be surprised to see just how fucking bad search results are to the normies without any cookies or cross-platform/device tracking for Google to know you have knowledge of something’s existence on their engine .
TL;DR boot up a clean install (temporary off usb even) of Linux and connect no account and go search and behold what Google with no or minimal ability to hide it’s censorship shows you . It’s absolutely horrifying. It also helps wrap one’s mind around why “normies” are so retarded . If they were at fault initially and many are for not doing due diligence , now anyone under the assumption (as understandable and sympathetic as it is absurd ) that it’s even possible without preexisting knowledge (how to search etc, what is actual proof or evidence)and personality traits and personal interest and time , they using google and intentionally presented an ocean of lies .
DuckDuckGo has been ganked since the SMO/ukraine invasion.
If you or anyone find any other engines I’d be glad to be educated as well.
So glad to have happened to passed this, for the time being, excellent too to aid pursuing truth.
I notice that they just sold for $5.2B so hopefully it doesn't become 100%. So I would just replace my browser with Yandex by downloading it from Apple AppStore or GooglePlay? Their website doesn't have a download I can find. Or would I put it as a search engine on my current browser? Sorry for my questions being so naive, I'm not very tech-savvy. I'm using Brave now but it certainly doesn't show me anything other than ads and propaganda.
Speaking of pc / desktop if you use that at all and have min 8 gigs of RAM dm me I can send you a key for VMware workstation pro 15 or 16 so you can do some research with virtual machines and comparing and contrasting search results from virgin machines with varying OSes without compromising your actual machine uptime.
Think of it as a browser window if the subject is foreign. For all intents and purposes a virtual machine is like having a browser window but the tabs are computers you’ve set up and can switch between them the exact same way as a web browser and web tabs. And the virtual computers depending on what you allocate and why can be persistent and incremental in terms of storage footprint, or volatile in a run once scenario.
For privacy or research it’s a hoop to be sure but it can be handy in ways one night but expect or envision until they try it out first hand.
Downside is you’ll need ISOs for each operating system and actually have them install the way it would in a physical machine. There are shortcuts once some baseline work is done such as scaling and etc but a minimum of 20 gigs storage for ISO file’s and minimalist footprint incremental storage is about the min although isos can be deleted once you are done installing .
Personally I have and do all of the above but usually use it as default search engine wherever I can so it can be in whatever browser I’m partial to. Their android app is okay and iOS . Personally I leedee integrating it into whatever is the fastest browser or best by my own metrics.
The fact it’s becoming an option in major browser apps is concerning to me because while it’s a piss off on iOS (apparently there is a way to get it done but I’ve been unable ) it also means it’s by no means flying below the radar as your market research shows as well . 🥲
On pc there’s always a way but with apps it used to bot be selectable on the ones that only provide that as options safari is a hold out .
On Canadian AppStore and even within iOS searching on my phone Yandex queries routing to the app on my phone or store is conspicuously shite.
Thank you so much, Heather! That means a lot coming from you, whose mind seems blow-proof after all this. Is that a word? Maybe a spell-breaking word ;-)
Wow, Tereza - that was a powerfully packed - under 20 minutes - video!
Latin is a synthetic language!! I had no idea, but makes so much sense. The parasitical lens and condensed understanding of how they did it - so succinct and clear.
I will rewatch, I want to absorb this information.
You do my heart good, Kathleen. When I put this together, I really had my doubts about how much I was jumping around. So it means a lot that you're connecting these dots and rewatching in order to put it all together. Thank you, my friend!
On the Zionist issue, it helps to know about British Israelism, which became a powerful influence in British politics and religion in the 1880s. British Christian Zionists believe that Britain IS Israel, in the sense that the British are the descendants of the non-Judaic so-called "Lost" Ten Tribes of Israel. This is integral to their interpretation of Biblical prophecy about The Second Coming and construction of The Third Temple in Jerusalem.
Oh that's so interesting Tirion. And you're referencing again the book I had in an open tab to order but delayed so that it timed out. I'm glad you're reminding me of it.
And the poem, is that Blake, Israhell? It's certainly another trick to use the majesty (see, another word trick to associate power and rulers) of poetry with meter and rhyme to get across propaganda. It's beautiful and dangerous.
And very interesting too about 2012 and the age of Aquarius. I interviewed Daniel Pinchbeck on his book on 2012 back in 2010. And someone on another of my threads was talking about the 5000 yrs of patriarchy that we're just coming out of with the age of Aries.
Yes, well, there is certainly a lot of evidence that members of The Holy Family did re-locate to Britain in AD 37 and founded the world's first Christian church, decades before Christianity reached Rome. In fact, this is not even disputed by Rome or by Canterbury. Whether Jesus himself (and/or one or more of his children) ever visited or lived in Britain, before or after the crucifixion, is a subject of debate. They married into several Ancient British royal and princely families. In Britain, Joseph of Arimathea was known as Saint Ilid. Constantine The Great was also one of their descendants. There are ancient place names from The Holy Land all over Wales and other parts of Britain.
I'm not sure who's more heretical, Tirion, me with 'Jesus didn't exist' or you with Jesus and his wife and brood of kids ;-) This is from King Jesus, is that right? I'm still eager to dig into that. Here's the question that I think it will answer: who are the dynastic parasites that the story of Jesus is whitewashing? Josephus says that Yohanan ben Zakkai and his Talmud scholars were saved by Josephus and Caesar to 'preserve' the Torah after the siege, along with the royal Davidic line. Who was the latter? Where did that line go after Jerusalem 'fell'? I think these are the parasites who Yews the Jews to hide behind, and they're definitely in London and own the City of, perhaps hiding behind the Rothschild/ Bauers.
The Romans are the real heretics and twisters of truth, Tereza, not you or me :)
Knowledge of The Holy Family going to Britain comes from the writings of a sixth-century British saint, Gildas, in his work, "De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae." Over the millennia, Rome has suppressed this knowledge in a bid to assert its false primacy.
Perhaps it is no coincidence that London is their base of operations if the royal Davidic line re-located to Britain after the crucifixion, decades before Jerusalem fell? As you know, the current British royal family claim descent from David, and they do this by claiming descent from Ancient British royalty: Cunedda Wledig, founder of The Kingdom of Gwynedd in North Wales, perhaps the oldest royal dynasty in Western Europe.
At the risk of becoming a crashing bore (it's never stopped me before!), it's also worth remembering that the reason The Holy Family re-located to Britain was because waves of Hebrews and Israelites had migrated there over the previous 1500 years and Britain was not then (AD 37) part of The Roman Empire. Lastly, the Romans were themselves descendants of Hebrew and Israelite migrants who had settled in Etruria after their defeat in The Trojan Wars, ie, they were cousins of the Ancient British. The British and the Romans openly acknowledged their kinship.
Ah I think I can outdo you in being a crashing bore, Tirion. I keep going back to the same old questions. If we set the Bible aside as not history, who are we talking about when we say Hebrews, Israelites, David, and the Holy Family? There were tens of thousands of crucifixions, which one do you mean? What documentation from that time period is Gildas referring to, and what name is used? If it's a reference to the Christ or Messiah, might it be Judas the Nazarene, who was called that? And on a moral basis, do we respect any leader who deserts their people and leaves them to be slaughtered while they escape somewhere safe? I don't know if that fits my definition of divine or even human leadership.
You could never be a crashing bore, Tereza! Those are all highly relevant and stimulating questions with possibly fascinating answers. I hope we can know those answers one day!
It also had the opening ceremony with dancing nurses, grim reaper holding a syringe scaring kids and a Boris caricature ill in bed. Going back to Barcelona, they had spike protein balls of scary ill looking people.
I'm glad you caught it too! I was going to post a note on your most recent letting you know, but I was in transit and didn't get back. Sometimes it seems like those embed notifications are on a time lapse, so it might still send it.
And yes, you're absolutely one of my heroes, Gabriel. You bring clarity, humility and patience to sorting out what's gone wrong and how to circumvent it in the short term and fix it in the long term. You give me hope that, when this all falls apart, we'll have the knowledge and will to put it back together the way that we want it to be. Happy to call you my friend.
Some say they come from Sardinia. Others link them to the Persian Empire and Scythians. It is accepted that 'they' produced offspring with women as they moved across the globe.
My question is whether the sons of "God" are still breeding with the daughters of men today? I think we're supposed to believe that it only happened in Biblical times; but I'm not sure about that at all. Who are the so-called "elite"/parasites who seem to be above the law, able to act with complete impunity? Who are they, really?
I'm researching another post on the archeology of Palestine, from Shlomo Sand's references and a book I have called Facts on the Ground. Something that caught my eye was that one of the cities they thought would be a Biblical site turned out to be Sythopolis. And considering this as Sethopolis is another great leap of insight from you, Nef. I thought that would be interesting to you both.
Oh this is excellent, CFB. Nef will be particularly interested in this:
"During the three hundred years of rule by the New Kingdom of Egypt, the population of Beit She'an appears to have been primarily Egyptian administrative officials and military personnel. The town was completely rebuilt, following a new layout, during the 19th dynasty.[19] The Penn Museum excavations uncovered two important stelae from the period of Seti I and a monument of Ramesses II.[20] One of those steles is particularly interesting because, according to William F. Albright,[21] it testifies to the presence of a Hebrew population: the Habiru, which Seti I protected from an Asiatic tribe."
Gruesome history of the place during the Hellenic era. Thanks for the research!
Exactly, it's like a set of onion skins, one inside the other -- inside the other. It's not just one red shield, it's many. Also setup in the Double Headed Phoenix Heraldry. Each head represents the following pattern: One shall Govern in front, while another Rules from behind. That's an old Scythian saying.
I definitely think that the word Hebrew in the Bible derives from the Habiru under Abdi-Ashirta, aka Abraham. The word Hyksos or Heka Khasut means foreign rulers who had infiltrated and then controlled Egypt. Habiru is more likely trespassers, as segasu is translated, or nomads and wanderers.
I look at Yahweh's relationship to Set(h) but I didn't know about Anu. Can you tell me more?
Hi Tereza, thanks for those links. I'll have a read through.
Here's a link following that explains why the author believes that Yahweh is based on the totalitarian and evil Anu, which was the supreme ruler of the Annunaki sky-gods.
All the pantheon of gods, as they jumped through time and history after the Great Flood (which seems to be the turning point), are from what I can see based on the stories in the Sumerian texts about the Annunaki sky-gods that came from 'heaven' - meaning another planet. The texts claim that they were aliens from the 12th planet.
I wonder about the alien story. It is clear from the texts and the civilization the Sumerians built after what was probably the Great Flood, that there was an advanced race of people on the planet, with advanced technology, and they had flying machines. And mankind was divided into rulers and slaves. Slaves were kept ignorant, hungry and weak - so stunted their development. Rulers lived in luxury and grew into giants. It is possible a cataclysm, like the Great Flood wiped it all out. And the collective memories of the survivors could have imagined the Annunaki as being aliens from another planet - but they could have been just an advanced race of totalitarian dictators on this one. They were constantly waging war on each other so it's possible they wiped themselves out.
All of the stories of our religions match the ancient texts. Everything found in the Bible.
All civilizations on different continents have matching stories about gods that came from the sky. All matching the Sumerian text stories. Creation myth. The Crown Monarchy System. Rulers and slaves. All the evil can be tracked back to the Annunaki and their doctrines.
This is what Eric von Daikin wrote about in his series of books starting with the Chariots of the Gods. But there are lots of people writing about it. Even Wikipedia has entries. It appears that there is so much to it that it's hard to link it all together.
But Anu is the EXACT IMAGE of both the Jews god Yahweh and what they gave us for Chrisitianity, and Islam. And the story of God drowning mankind - it's his story. He hated mankind according to the Sumerian texts.
I have come to believe that the Israelites learned all these stories in Babylon, which conquered Sumer, and took their cults and knowledge, and gods.
And so the 12 tribes of Israel after generations of learning all these secrets created a pact to rule the world their way. They made up a god, made up their myths based on the Sumerian texts - Noah and the 12 tribes - it's in the Annunaki history, the Garden of Eden, the creation story, and God being angry with mankind - But the real explanation was that Anu, the Annunaki king wanted to keep mankind as perpetual slaves, so hid from us our true origins, true potentials, kept us ignorant, hungry and weak, denied us knowledge (don't eat of the Tree of Knowledge) and denied us long live (Tree of Life) - and when mankind kept rebelling against being slaves - Anu decided to mass murder us all and depopulate the earth - he sent plagues, famines and droughts, and then drowned us out with the Great Flood.
At which point if the Annunaki were truly aliens they left the planet.
The Israelites meantime were one of the groups that were reviving civilizations based on these ancient totalitarian doctrines, and constant war to create empires and subjugate other groups to their power. In Babylon they'd learned the power of education and the power of banking, usury and debt slavery by using the Money Monopoly.
My theory is that the Israelites became a virtual Zionist Evil Empire after the Romans smashed their temple, they've infiltrated and added to their team, they created Christianity through the Cult of Mithras, and then took over the Roman Empire by becoming the Roman Catholic Church - a virtual empire of God based on religion, originating in Zion!!! There's two good books you can download free that explain the Jews created Christianity - and the hidden Zionist empire. Have you read these?
For the time being, I'm entertaining the possibility that "they could have been just an advanced race of totalitarian dictators on this one." I don't rule out aliens but the theory leaves us with the option of all-out war, alien witch hunts, helplessness.
I think the trajectory is reversed. In my book I begin with the simultaneous inventions of coinage/ taxation and democracy aka a pantheon of oligarchs. I show how it co-opted all of us into the conquest of our neighbors in order to protect our families--creating a cognitive dissonance among the enablers.
At the same time, these religions sprang up. The powers behind the thrones, who issued their coins, invented themselves as the voice of god, the hieros, gave themselves divine status. They then usurped all the stories and gods to fashion for their purpose.
If my theory's true, it vastly simplifies what we need to do--take back the money that's backed by housing (through the mortgage) and make it the exclusive privilege of local commonwealths, no greater than 200K people. It doesn't kill the snake, just defangs it so that our labor isn't given for free going forward. I think we should try that first.
I absolutely agree with you that if we 'take back the money' then it is really over for this group of psychopaths, who I've renamed in recent days for my own thinking as the Zion Imperial Cult, and the Zionist Imperial Empire - which naturally is made up of the bankers, billionaires, and monarchies. All roads lead to Zion.
I used to think it was Rome.
But now I see they just took over Rome with monotheism, Judaism rebranded as Christianity.
Here's something really interesting that I came up with today about polytheism - I refuse now to call it paganism because that was the rebranding name to demean it. It turns out the polytheists of Rome thought the Israelites monotheism was 'barbarous.'
But what's really interesting is I came to this today while reading through a 1730 essay "The Natural History of Religion" by the British writer David Hume, who argues, as I've been thinking for ages, that polytheism is the oldest and most natural religion in history - And that is that polytheism was a way of valuing the BEST OF MANKIND and inspiring people to emulate it - and that monotheism cancelled it and humanity went backwards.
Here's a part worth reading - and some of my comments as I copied it to my flies.
So sociable is polytheism, that the utmost fierceness and antipathy, which it meets with in an opposite religion, is scarcely able to disgust it, and keep it at a distance. Augustus praised extremely the reserve of his grandson, Caius Cæsar, when this latter prince, passing by Jerusalem, deigned not to sacrifice according to the Jewish law. But for what reason did Augustus so much approve of this conduct? Only, because that religion was by the Pagans esteemed ignoble and barbarous[49].
Ivan-INVERSION – the Romans thought monotheism was BARBOROUS.
I may venture to affirm, that few corruptions of idolatry and polytheism are more pernicious to society than this corruption of theism[50], when carried to the utmost height.
The human sacrifices of the Carthaginians, Mexicans, and many barbarous nations[51], scarcely exceed the inquisition and persecutions of Rome and Madrid. For besides, that the effusion of blood may not be so great in the former case as in the latter; besides this, I say, the human victims, being chosen by lot, or by some exterior signs, affect not, in so considerable a degree, the rest of the society.
Whereas virtue, knowledge, love of liberty, are the qualities, which call down the fatal vengeance of inquisitors; and when expelled, leave the society in the most shameful ignorance, corruption, and bondage. The illegal murder of one man by a tyrant is more pernicious than the death of a thousand by pestilence, famine, or any undistinguishing calamity.
Where the deity is represented as infinitely superior to mankind, this belief, though altogether just, is apt, when joined with superstitious terror, to sink the human mind into the lowest submission and abasement, and to represent the monkish virtues of mortification, penance, humility, and passive suffering, as the only qualities which are acceptable to him.
But where the gods are conceived to be only a little superior to mankind, and to have been, many of them, advanced from that inferior rank, we are more at our ease in our addresses to them, and may even, without profaneness, aspire sometimes to a rival-ship and emulation of them.
Hence activity, spirit, courage, magnanimity, love of liberty, and all the virtues which aggrandize a people.
Ivan-oh my god. Polytheism bought out the best of mankind, which is what produced great civilizations like the Roman Empire.
The heroes in paganism correspond exactly to the saints in popery and holy dervises in Mahometanism. The place of Hercules, Theseus, Hector, Romulus, is now supplied by Dominic, Francis, Anthony, and Benedict.
Instead of the destruction of monsters, the subduing of tyrants, the defense of our native country; whippings and fastings, cowardice and humility, abject submission and slavish obedience, are become the means of obtaining celestial honours among mankind.
Ivan-all of which serves the Crown Monarchy System and SLAVERY, not the betterment of mankind. FFS.
One great incitement to the pious Alexander in his warlike expeditions was his rivalship of Hercules and Bacchus, whom he justly pretended to have excelled[53]. Brasidas, that generous and noble Spartan, after falling in battle, had heroic honours paid him by the inhabitants of Amphipolis, whose defence he had embraced[54]. And in general, all founders of states and colonies among the Greeks were raised to this inferior rank of divinity, by those who reaped the benefit of their labours.
This gave rise to the observation of Machiavel[55], that the doctrines of the Christian religion (meaning the catholic; for he knew no other) which recommend only passive courage and suffering, had subdued the spirit of mankind, and had fitted them for slavery and subjection. An observation, which would certainly be just, were there not many other circumstances in human society which control the genius and character of a religion.
Brasidas seized a mouse, and being bit by it, let it go. There is nothing so contemptible, said he, but what may be safe, if it has but courage to defend itself[56]. Whereas Bellarmine patiently and humbly allowed the fleas and other odious vermin to prey upon him. We shall have heaven, said he, to reward us for our sufferings: But these poor creatures have nothing but the enjoyment of the present life[57].
Such difference is there between the maxims of a Greek hero and a Catholic saint.
So many great points here, Ivan. I'm going to save it in a draft for a different post. Yes, inversion is the great key to unlocking the truth, which has been turned and encrypted. Thanks for reposting this interesting portion.
Tereza, wow - I am gobsmacked that you said 'So many great points here, Ivan. I'm going to save it in a draft for a different post.'
My first thought is 'THANKS for the wonderful compliment that is inherent i n your words.'
And second, please, please, please go right ahead and use anything and everything that you were inspired by to save it as a draft and make it into something that helps educate and empower our audience.
I learned something new from this: "synthetic language". I discovered that it means inflected languages. I have only a smattering of experience with Latin, but more experience with Russian, which is similar to Latin in its use of inflection.
So I'm not sure that Latin being "synthetic" means that it has no roots. You have more knowledge about this, so please correct my misunderstanding.
Oh that was just my word for it, Mark. I was using synthetic as the opposite of organic and growing naturally from an indigenous language. From what I'd read, it had no root but was artificially put together. But I didn't mean it as a technical term.
Great essay, btw, on stuff. I didn't have time to comment because I was getting this out before my trip but it was something to which I can certainly relate.
Latin is like English in some of the way it is composited.
Many languages are "composited" or are synthetic, by having come into contact with other languages, resulting in a spoken form that is not connected back to any original roots.
A good example is how English evolved into what we see today. Everyone knows about how different "Old English" is from today's English. Our language is a Composited one; by having gone through at least 4 distinct development periods, this is from Langster:
The Old English period (5th-11th centuries), Middle English period (11th-15th centuries), and Modern English period (16th century to present) are the three main divisions in the history of the English language. According to Langster: "The English language is a West Germanic language that 'originated' in England."
The origination point is a limited context for it's beginning however. It was spoken by "Anglo-Saxons," (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes) who settled in England in the 5th century. The Anglo-Saxons were a mix of Germanic tribes from Scandinavia and Germany. There was a distinct language spoken in the British Isles before that. Each of these sub groups spoke their own language or variants, while borrowing words from each other to gain effective interaction. Romance languages such as French, Italian, and Spanish, which evolved from Latin, have also influenced English vocabulary.
So, now Latin or "Old Roman Language" was likely influenced in a similar way. Latin was heavily influenced by both the Etruscan and Greek languages. Proto Indo European is considered an original language that most later languages can be traced back to.
It would be interesting to see what the difference is between the language of the Habiru (Hebrew) the Turkic language of the Khazars; and the Yiddish language of the Ashkenazi descendants that now control Israel. What they speak in Israel is NOT Hebrew, it is a variant of Yiddish written with Hebrew characters.
Thanks, Nef. I'm also meaning to imply something more premeditated and sinister with the word synthetic, like synthetic meat. I think patriarchal rulers have infiltrated the language and embedded their spells of violence, conquest and control into our 'kitchen language,' what we use at home and among ourselves.
Yes, I completely agree. There's a lot of examples of this. It's built into colloquial and idiomatic expressions and some of our word usage. Our stories form habits, built into language. Etymology study reveals a lot of it.
Synthetic Meat is a great analogy. Definitely a sinister part of language.
"There was a distinct language spoken in the British Isles before that." It was called the British language, now known as Welsh, one of the oldest languages in the world, a well-preserved form of Ancient Assyrian, with roots going back to Ancient Egypt (and possibly Atlantis?). The journey of the language to Britain along the migration routes from The Middle East is clearly traceable in Iberia, Etruria, Rhaetia (Switzerland), The Aegean, Trojan-Phrygia in Asia Minor and further back into Ancient Assyria and Palestine in stone inscriptions using the Coelbren/Kolbrin alphabet, which the mainstream tries to smear as an eighteenth-century fabrication. Incidentally, this also correlates to the DNA of modern Welsh people. So it stands to reason that Latin was influenced by Etruscan/Khumric.
I'm very grateful to have you, Tirion, and Nef adding this knowledge of linguistics to my comments. That's really interesting that the original British language is now called Welsh, and traces back to Assyria and Egypt. Atlantis certainly goes along with the episode on Celtic migration to Egypt for a race of red-headed giants.
Based on what I have found so far you are quite right. Welsh is known for being present for approx 4,000 years. The Basque language is another Language isolate, not related to any other language in Europe. There is evidence in Egypt that there was some form of commerce going on, maybe like a trade net work, which would have been an excellent way for language to spread and intermingle. Inevitably, there are relationships that cannot be ignored. So, I do see your point.
My sense about Egyptian is that it went through several major changes between the first and second intermediate periods. New Kingdom language would be significantly different from the Old Kingdom; this may have been due to the Usurpers the Hyksos, or it may be because of the gradual effects the language would get from trade. I have not studied Latin or Etruscan, I am sure similar forces were at work in those languages; I think Tereza is right by calling them Synthetic, because of the influences coming from Infiltration and Parasitic controllers of those cultures.
This is an absolutely excellent post, Tereza you covered many aspects of the Parasitic Elites; who are likely related to the Habiru, originally. They were the Name Stealers who hijacked language, to control the concept of God and Money. To keep this power, they provided "solutions" for the "problems" they created. I cross posted.
You totally nailed it on the 5 Rules, which are the same patterns of Infiltration seen in many facets of the system we are living in.
First the words, then the world -- Steal Names and Hijack Language infiltrate communities, if you can trap Meaning within Definitions, then you can control the Cultural Symbols.
Create a god in your own image -- Create a psychological attachment to Hierarchy, make God only available to those who subscribe to the Re Legion
Coin the realm to own it -- Sever true treasure which is our personal capital, with a Symbol called Money. If you can trap the value of something inside a symbol, then make it scarce you can Control it. and the people who use it.
Create chaos; divide to conquer -- Terror and War are tools for building Empire. They are also tools to gain consent to be governed.
Impose ‘solutions’ to problems you cause -- Problem -- Reaction -- Solution.
Also:
I thought that it was worth reposting this comment from Tereza's previous post: MMT & Home Economics; I had responded to Tirion in regards to "The Great Taking." It shows an important part of the puzzle in comprehending the Economic System we are in. It's discussion is centered on "Trusts."
In October of last year, I posted this:
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/corporate-chains-of-custody-illustrate
In the above post, I also reference most of my source info on how the Trust System is really at the core of Monetary Policies, Government Policies, Corporate Control of Equities, Land Ownership, how the Corporate Government is ruling from behind a curtain, while most people are fooled into accepting the Government as a Republic. There are many dimensions to this. In this post, I referenced another substack; that corroborates the items in my post: https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law by American Hypnotist.
There is a commenter in American Hypnotist's post that everyone should read. He goes by "Bitter Root Services" I think the comment approximately half way down, he describes "why" the whole Globalist, Centralized System seems to keep going and why the Power to "control" something is seemingly more attractive than "owning" something. Trust are like Russian nesting dolls. Trust can exist inside of Trusts, inside of Trust, inside of.... well you get the idea.
In my post, Corporate Chains of Custody there is a diagram of approximately how this looks, a picture is worth a thousand words.
And after I actually went to that comment section, I found that Tereza and Bitter Root had a most wonderful exchange; important and informative enough that I'm printing it out; I wish I had gone to check it out before. Here is a direct link to the comment section, if you would like to check it out; I hope you will. ;-)
https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law/comments?publication_id=1135129&post_id=137372598&isFreemail=true&comments=true
I have begun to get into your book, How to Dismantle an Empire, I am liking it a lot. I think your solutions will work.
I'm at my daughter's so was waiting until this morning when I could respond to your multilayered comment, Nef. First, you're reading my book! What a lovely surprise. I was intending to bring you a copy next time I was in your town but you've leapfrogged that intent. (Again, on words, I was about to put 'beaten me to it' but why is the violent image of beating part of our everyday friendly language?)
Thank you for cross-posting this! That's very kind of you. And yes, infiltration rather than military conquest, much more efficient. It's certainly the nomadic peoples who were the first Yews or Ewes, as I'm coming to think of them. Not one tribe or race but a style of roaming people who could be herded by a 'shepherd'. In one of the ancient texts, it was mentioned that the herdsmen were feared. The tribes themselves have always been Used, imo.
I'm not sure whether definition is the problem or our solution. I think they shift the definitions and truncate the words away from them, so we use words with imprecise meanings often contrary to our intent, sending subliminal images of violence in casual conversation, as I almost did above.
Very true on god, coins and chaos as all leading us into their hierarchy or hieros archons, 'holy rulers' or divinely-appointed. And it's not just making the money scarce but also making us dependent on it for taxes. But you already know that from my book. Yay!
I would be so delighted to have an autographed copy of your book, that would make my day, I would love it. I left an analytical description of language evolution for Mark, above.
And no, I would never want "Beat anyone" to anything HA ha ha ;-) Let's just say we have synchronicity with each other, I feel so proud to be working along side you on these things. Your writing style is very clear, I am really seeing that in your book, I encourage everyone to read it.
By the way, I'm going to make it a regular thing to cross post your posts, (at least some of them anyway) I don't know why I wasn't thinking about that before. I think of us as on the same team, why not? --- Nef
"Laws of War Video" was so heart wrenching. For this to be intentionally done by anyone against children, while squealing "Antisemitism" as an excuse, makes me wonder how long before something can actually be done to stop them. When killing children becomes normalized, for foolish ideology, that is where Civilization goes to die.
These were the same Zionist who Fashioned Nazis to be oppressors; so they could target and destroy Germany.
Terrific post. I’ve David Webb’s video and the written article that the video is based on in my cue and it has been sitting there for months. You’ve spurred me to finally take a look.
So… Rome was a military post and it had no women? How on earth did I go 45 years without ever knowing that? I knew they were into having sex with young boys, but I thought that was cultural more than the lack of female presence. And the Ashlenazi thread is very interesting too. The male DNA being traced back to Palestine requires my further investigation for sure.
Totally wild how much unlearning I have to do. I love your approach of weaving in and out of the metaphysical and historical and psychological and mythological… hard dot connecting but also flavored with my kind of woo.
Also, is that your backyard and garden? I’m jelly how much space you have and how groomed everything looks. I love my backyard and put a lot of work in it, but in the end, it still looks like a gypsy hippie playground I have to share with the rabbits, squirrels and city rats.
Thank you so much, Tonika. I met with Neshma today and was thinking of you!
I'll be very interesting in your take on David. I liked him a lot and he's very smart with lots of great information and insights. I really could have done a long presentation on his video but it's already succinct and to the point.
And on Rome, right? It was totally by accident I found this out when I did this one: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-anti-matri-male. While looking at John Carter's series under the Tonic Masculinity title he stole from me, I read about The Rape of the Sabines: "After the foundation of Rome, the city was primarily inhabited by young warriors, bandits, and adventurers who flocked to what would become the Eternal City. These men had no wives, and none were to be found, and one can only imagine that this was leading to dissatisfaction and discord, to say nothing of the obvious problem of sustaining the city’s population beyond a single generation. The Romans tried negotiating with the surrounding peoples, but none would part with their daughters. So Rome decided to take them. Romulus threw a party, holding games and a feast, to which he invited the surrounding tribes. When all were good and drunk his soldiers abducted their daughters and fought back their fathers and brothers. This was the infamous Rape of the Sabine Women."
The story continues that, after some years and Rome conquering other cities, they finally clashed with the Sabines and fathers of their rapees. But the women threw themselves between their husbands and fathers, imploring the latter to just give up and let Sabinum become Roman rather than kill their 'husbands'. I call bullshit. Here's his article, this part's further down: https://barsoom.substack.com/p/pixel-valhalla. John's damn funny.
Glad to be your kind of woo! And yes, and it's filmed from the wedding pagoda I had built for my daughter and doesn't even show the orchard or Coop de Ville. I have a really deep lot because the alleyway ends at my neighbor's garage--so no access but extra space which was a total jungle when I was your age, youngster, and had a 4 yr old, 10 yr old and 12 yr old, yard full of free ranging chickens and bunnies we had to herd and catch to put back in their cages nightly. At one point my grass grew so high it touched the clothesline--deep meadow. Absolutely out of control weeds. What you're seeing now is a woman who got rid of the husband and kids and hired a landscaper, cementing in two patios, dropping in truckloads of mulch, and making a manageable postage-stamp lawn. Think of this as inspiration for your next 22 years! But all that time of chicken and rabbit poop definitely laid the groundwork, so to speak. Another time we'll talk city rats, and how I lost the battle for 15 yrs of chickens, my fellow hippie chick ;-)
Oh hell yeah!! Looking forward to that!
So… the Sabine women were just cool with the rape? Is that what you’re calling bullshit? Or they just didn’t want their children to suffer? Trying to put myself in those sandals. How much of culture was shaped my warriors taking what they want and women not having a say, whether it’s to their fathers or their husbands. Glad not to be living in those times. Sheesh! Or maybe we did and we carry the ancestral trauma with us every day. That would explain some things. 🧐
Well, let's start with who's telling the history here, spelling in context. I think it's a total misogynist myth. Never happened--the rape yes, but I would gladly have let my father come in and kill all of the rapists so I could raise my children in a society that didn't do that. Are we to believe that after the kidnapping they gave the women property rights and treated them honorably? Or were they slaves with more privileges?
That's made sense to me of everything that's come since. We may not be raped but have we ever actually known freedom, living in a society formed by women, with children at the center?
The project that Neshma is helping me with is a graphic and extreme reminder of 'no!' Somehow I have a feeling you're going to be part of this project. Don't know how, don't know when, but I think it has your future fingerprints on it.
Oh, my interest is definitely piqued. I love your saying how our society would do best if the children are in the center, cared for by the women, protected by the men on the outer circle. I cite you and the is concept n real life conversations and both men and women alike nod their heads in agreement. Almost as if it’s an innate understanding so we all get it.
Thanks for the history lesson. If you’d allow me an anecdote: Bulgarian lore has it that during the 500 Turkish conquest, they’d steal young maidens from their homes to rape and betroth. To avoid this faith, 40 teenage girls from a seaside village interbraided their long black hair and jumped into the Black Sea together where they perished. There are stories like that in every corner of the world. I still can’t shake the tales from India where young mothers would smother their babes if they were born girls in attempt to spare them the violence they know would be bestowed on them. Women can carry around the female ancestral trauma but I bet men carry it too, having watched their sisters, wives, and daughters suffer such violence. We’ve got so much healing to do.
Heavy, heavy stuff, Tonika. Yes, it's time for the patrix to end. I'm honored to be quoted by you on that, and grateful to hear that there are men who nod in agreement. Thanks for sharing that.
Wonderful comment thread -- thanks, you two. Learned (and sighed) a lot.
🙌
Oh and Neshma is a gem!
Your landscaper is doing a fine job for you. The tall grass you had means that the soil is very healthy. I was noticing the yard in the video, your fruit trees look well kept. It must rain more often in the area where you are right? So, you probably don't have a drying out problem as we do in San Diego.
Rain depends on what the weather 'gods' decide--drought or drowning. But yes, we've had a couple good years of rain, some of it too good.
And yes, all my years of experimenting with animal husbandry has left me with some good soil. And I'm so happy to get to the point where it's manageable because I really relate to Tonika where things have been so out of control I had to hide my eyes when I went back there. But that deep meadow made for some great Easter egg hunts!
"...put a lot of work in it, but in the end, it still looks like a gypsy hippie playground I have to share with the rabbits, squirrels and city rats."
This made me laugh, cause of part of it is we just can't escape ourselves. I can go out and buy new clothes, but basically they all the same.
I'm sure it's a charming mess and also reflective of a busy mom of young kids. When your times frees up down the line, you'll see. (The gypsy-hippie thing will still be there I bet.)
I had the same reaction - only many more years - how did I never hear about this?!
A benefit of discovering that much of what you thought made up 'reality' was shot full of holes or outright fabricated is that so much is new again! :-)
Oh so true! In theatre we have this thing in the clowning genre, that what makes a truly a hilarious and heartbreaking clown performance so good is that the actor understands that a clown discovers everything anew, like a child. Although having the strength and responsibilities of an adult, the clown sees the world through the eyes of a child and it can be endearing to see the clown navigate situations with hilarious results. It’s why I can never turn around and call some politician or bad guy a clown as an insult. It’s more insulting to the clown, really. Clowns are rarely malicious in intent. And even then it’s because they’re emulating some power structure they saw in the world, consequently bringing our attention to that dysfunction.
Haha. I totally went off on a tangent. It was meant to support your “new reality” feeling but now I dunno if it relates. But on a different note, I’ll take your “charming mess” descriptor because I really need to and bless you for making my hippie soul feel good.
I told my daughter about our exchange and she said that it's a message to moms in the thick of it not to fear the empty nest.
I love the clown analogy, Tonika! That's such a wisdom. It's why I don't refer to global predators, it's an insult to predators, who serve an important purpose. And the function is much more parasitical of an enormous host that's been infiltrated and turned around to serve a tiny invader.
I also used to say, when someone was essentially unparented, that they were raised by wolves. But then I realized that wolf moms have excellent parenting. It's honestly when the mom becomes more like a man, valuing money, prestige, competition and sexual relationships over her children. So it does go back to the bear or man question--some children are raised by men with vaginas, and would have been better off raised by bears.
Christian Zionism before the bs Schofield Bible ?!?
*pauses and Yandexes*
https://www.unz.com/wwebb/the-untold-story-of-christian-zionisms-rise-to-power-in-the-united-states/
Learn something new every day here on Substack , thanks !
Ah, I love Whitney! Great addition from Unz Review on the topic. Thanks so much, Hailey!
And Yandexes is new to me, but I like the alternative to 'Googles'. Tell me more!
https://yandex.com/
Yandex "finds everything" google does not want you to find.
Also a great translation tool
https://translate.yandex.com/?source_lang=ru&target_lang=en
Yandex, as far as I know (very limited ) is the only search engine where you don’t have a 100% chance of being gaslit.
Does unfortunately seem to be crumbling to a degree (my subjective perception )
But many things that are “unfindable” on Google can be readily, or with improved search statements reasonably found . Keep mind even if you’re using VPNs and/or other services etc you’d be surprised to see just how fucking bad search results are to the normies without any cookies or cross-platform/device tracking for Google to know you have knowledge of something’s existence on their engine .
TL;DR boot up a clean install (temporary off usb even) of Linux and connect no account and go search and behold what Google with no or minimal ability to hide it’s censorship shows you . It’s absolutely horrifying. It also helps wrap one’s mind around why “normies” are so retarded . If they were at fault initially and many are for not doing due diligence , now anyone under the assumption (as understandable and sympathetic as it is absurd ) that it’s even possible without preexisting knowledge (how to search etc, what is actual proof or evidence)and personality traits and personal interest and time , they using google and intentionally presented an ocean of lies .
DuckDuckGo has been ganked since the SMO/ukraine invasion.
If you or anyone find any other engines I’d be glad to be educated as well.
So glad to have happened to passed this, for the time being, excellent too to aid pursuing truth.
All the best and thanks for your work!
I notice that they just sold for $5.2B so hopefully it doesn't become 100%. So I would just replace my browser with Yandex by downloading it from Apple AppStore or GooglePlay? Their website doesn't have a download I can find. Or would I put it as a search engine on my current browser? Sorry for my questions being so naive, I'm not very tech-savvy. I'm using Brave now but it certainly doesn't show me anything other than ads and propaganda.
Speaking of pc / desktop if you use that at all and have min 8 gigs of RAM dm me I can send you a key for VMware workstation pro 15 or 16 so you can do some research with virtual machines and comparing and contrasting search results from virgin machines with varying OSes without compromising your actual machine uptime.
Think of it as a browser window if the subject is foreign. For all intents and purposes a virtual machine is like having a browser window but the tabs are computers you’ve set up and can switch between them the exact same way as a web browser and web tabs. And the virtual computers depending on what you allocate and why can be persistent and incremental in terms of storage footprint, or volatile in a run once scenario.
For privacy or research it’s a hoop to be sure but it can be handy in ways one night but expect or envision until they try it out first hand.
Downside is you’ll need ISOs for each operating system and actually have them install the way it would in a physical machine. There are shortcuts once some baseline work is done such as scaling and etc but a minimum of 20 gigs storage for ISO file’s and minimalist footprint incremental storage is about the min although isos can be deleted once you are done installing .
https://www.vmware.com/content/vmware/vmware-published-sites/us/products/desktop-hypervisor.html.html.html
There a 30 day free trial
Personally I have and do all of the above but usually use it as default search engine wherever I can so it can be in whatever browser I’m partial to. Their android app is okay and iOS . Personally I leedee integrating it into whatever is the fastest browser or best by my own metrics.
The fact it’s becoming an option in major browser apps is concerning to me because while it’s a piss off on iOS (apparently there is a way to get it done but I’ve been unable ) it also means it’s by no means flying below the radar as your market research shows as well . 🥲
On pc there’s always a way but with apps it used to bot be selectable on the ones that only provide that as options safari is a hold out .
On Canadian AppStore and even within iOS searching on my phone Yandex queries routing to the app on my phone or store is conspicuously shite.
https://apps.apple.com/ca/app/yandex-browser/id483693909
So F’ing good.
🙏
I appreciate that, Cormorant. Nice to see you here and on Amy's stack.
wow, mind blowing. 💥👏❤️
Thank you so much, Heather! That means a lot coming from you, whose mind seems blow-proof after all this. Is that a word? Maybe a spell-breaking word ;-)
I agree that this "Second Coming" is the driving force for a great deal of what is happening today.
Wow, Tereza - that was a powerfully packed - under 20 minutes - video!
Latin is a synthetic language!! I had no idea, but makes so much sense. The parasitical lens and condensed understanding of how they did it - so succinct and clear.
I will rewatch, I want to absorb this information.
Brilliant. Thank you for this.
Happy traveling.
You do my heart good, Kathleen. When I put this together, I really had my doubts about how much I was jumping around. So it means a lot that you're connecting these dots and rewatching in order to put it all together. Thank you, my friend!
On the Zionist issue, it helps to know about British Israelism, which became a powerful influence in British politics and religion in the 1880s. British Christian Zionists believe that Britain IS Israel, in the sense that the British are the descendants of the non-Judaic so-called "Lost" Ten Tribes of Israel. This is integral to their interpretation of Biblical prophecy about The Second Coming and construction of The Third Temple in Jerusalem.
"Is Britain a Lost Israel"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGbT_Ht7AUo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHb1Gqgi3hw&list=PLauGsrWGXgYRDZogB5w3yVqHq4zMbA8rG&index=1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism
https://williamcongreve.co.uk/books/p3qeyjknbrkd6bmk/the-great-migrations-to-britain-of-1527-bc-and-485-bc/
Oh that's so interesting Tirion. And you're referencing again the book I had in an open tab to order but delayed so that it timed out. I'm glad you're reminding me of it.
And the poem, is that Blake, Israhell? It's certainly another trick to use the majesty (see, another word trick to associate power and rulers) of poetry with meter and rhyme to get across propaganda. It's beautiful and dangerous.
And very interesting too about 2012 and the age of Aquarius. I interviewed Daniel Pinchbeck on his book on 2012 back in 2010. And someone on another of my threads was talking about the 5000 yrs of patriarchy that we're just coming out of with the age of Aries.
And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England's mountains green?
And was the Holy Lamb of God
On England's pleasant pastures seen?
And did the Countenance Divine
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among these dark Satanic mills?
Bring me my bow of burning gold!
Bring me my arrows of desire!
Bring me my spear: O clouds unfold!
Bring me my Chariot of Fire!
I will not cease from mental fight
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand
Till we have built Jerusalem
In England's green and pleasant land
I heard that the Olympic City built for the Olympic Games in London in 2012 have street names from Jerusalem.
Slightly off topic , but it is 2012 related: I read somewhere that the age of aquarius started on 21/21 that year (winter solstice)..
Yes, well, there is certainly a lot of evidence that members of The Holy Family did re-locate to Britain in AD 37 and founded the world's first Christian church, decades before Christianity reached Rome. In fact, this is not even disputed by Rome or by Canterbury. Whether Jesus himself (and/or one or more of his children) ever visited or lived in Britain, before or after the crucifixion, is a subject of debate. They married into several Ancient British royal and princely families. In Britain, Joseph of Arimathea was known as Saint Ilid. Constantine The Great was also one of their descendants. There are ancient place names from The Holy Land all over Wales and other parts of Britain.
I'm not sure who's more heretical, Tirion, me with 'Jesus didn't exist' or you with Jesus and his wife and brood of kids ;-) This is from King Jesus, is that right? I'm still eager to dig into that. Here's the question that I think it will answer: who are the dynastic parasites that the story of Jesus is whitewashing? Josephus says that Yohanan ben Zakkai and his Talmud scholars were saved by Josephus and Caesar to 'preserve' the Torah after the siege, along with the royal Davidic line. Who was the latter? Where did that line go after Jerusalem 'fell'? I think these are the parasites who Yews the Jews to hide behind, and they're definitely in London and own the City of, perhaps hiding behind the Rothschild/ Bauers.
The Romans are the real heretics and twisters of truth, Tereza, not you or me :)
Knowledge of The Holy Family going to Britain comes from the writings of a sixth-century British saint, Gildas, in his work, "De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae." Over the millennia, Rome has suppressed this knowledge in a bid to assert its false primacy.
Perhaps it is no coincidence that London is their base of operations if the royal Davidic line re-located to Britain after the crucifixion, decades before Jerusalem fell? As you know, the current British royal family claim descent from David, and they do this by claiming descent from Ancient British royalty: Cunedda Wledig, founder of The Kingdom of Gwynedd in North Wales, perhaps the oldest royal dynasty in Western Europe.
At the risk of becoming a crashing bore (it's never stopped me before!), it's also worth remembering that the reason The Holy Family re-located to Britain was because waves of Hebrews and Israelites had migrated there over the previous 1500 years and Britain was not then (AD 37) part of The Roman Empire. Lastly, the Romans were themselves descendants of Hebrew and Israelite migrants who had settled in Etruria after their defeat in The Trojan Wars, ie, they were cousins of the Ancient British. The British and the Romans openly acknowledged their kinship.
Ah I think I can outdo you in being a crashing bore, Tirion. I keep going back to the same old questions. If we set the Bible aside as not history, who are we talking about when we say Hebrews, Israelites, David, and the Holy Family? There were tens of thousands of crucifixions, which one do you mean? What documentation from that time period is Gildas referring to, and what name is used? If it's a reference to the Christ or Messiah, might it be Judas the Nazarene, who was called that? And on a moral basis, do we respect any leader who deserts their people and leaves them to be slaughtered while they escape somewhere safe? I don't know if that fits my definition of divine or even human leadership.
You could never be a crashing bore, Tereza! Those are all highly relevant and stimulating questions with possibly fascinating answers. I hope we can know those answers one day!
It also had the opening ceremony with dancing nurses, grim reaper holding a syringe scaring kids and a Boris caricature ill in bed. Going back to Barcelona, they had spike protein balls of scary ill looking people.
Thanks for featuring my post!
I'm completely floored that you've described me as "one of your heroes"!
Substack isn't giving embed notifications (to me?) anymore, so I had so I'm glad I caught this! Hope you're doing well 😃
I'm glad you caught it too! I was going to post a note on your most recent letting you know, but I was in transit and didn't get back. Sometimes it seems like those embed notifications are on a time lapse, so it might still send it.
And yes, you're absolutely one of my heroes, Gabriel. You bring clarity, humility and patience to sorting out what's gone wrong and how to circumvent it in the short term and fix it in the long term. You give me hope that, when this all falls apart, we'll have the knowledge and will to put it back together the way that we want it to be. Happy to call you my friend.
Good one, Tereza! Jeff
Thanks so much, Jeff!
Great piece. Isn't it a pretty open question that even Ashkenazis are rooted in the Mideast?
I'd say it was more "obfuscated" than "open."
Okay .........
Some say they come from Sardinia. Others link them to the Persian Empire and Scythians. It is accepted that 'they' produced offspring with women as they moved across the globe.
Have you read what Frances Leader says about them?:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101?utm_source=publication-search
My question is whether the sons of "God" are still breeding with the daughters of men today? I think we're supposed to believe that it only happened in Biblical times; but I'm not sure about that at all. Who are the so-called "elite"/parasites who seem to be above the law, able to act with complete impunity? Who are they, really?
I'm researching another post on the archeology of Palestine, from Shlomo Sand's references and a book I have called Facts on the Ground. Something that caught my eye was that one of the cities they thought would be a Biblical site turned out to be Sythopolis. And considering this as Sethopolis is another great leap of insight from you, Nef. I thought that would be interesting to you both.
Scyth and Seth; yes! And Sythopolis, etymologically speaking there seems to be a connection. ;-)
Oh I even think it was Scythopolis. I'll check when I get home.
This one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beit_She'an
https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0064:entry=bethsan-geo&highlight=scythopolis
Been a while since I read in more depth and there's not much to find with a quick search, but it seems like some kind of concentration/torture camp for pagans existed in Scythopolis in the 4th century AD. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2007.01.0082:book=19:chapter=12&highlight=scythopolis
Oh this is excellent, CFB. Nef will be particularly interested in this:
"During the three hundred years of rule by the New Kingdom of Egypt, the population of Beit She'an appears to have been primarily Egyptian administrative officials and military personnel. The town was completely rebuilt, following a new layout, during the 19th dynasty.[19] The Penn Museum excavations uncovered two important stelae from the period of Seti I and a monument of Ramesses II.[20] One of those steles is particularly interesting because, according to William F. Albright,[21] it testifies to the presence of a Hebrew population: the Habiru, which Seti I protected from an Asiatic tribe."
Gruesome history of the place during the Hellenic era. Thanks for the research!
I love Frances Leader's post on the Black Nobility; they are the ones who own the Laws.
Yes, aren't they also the ones hiding behind the Zionists, who in turn hide behind Jews/Jewishness/antisemitism?
Exactly, it's like a set of onion skins, one inside the other -- inside the other. It's not just one red shield, it's many. Also setup in the Double Headed Phoenix Heraldry. Each head represents the following pattern: One shall Govern in front, while another Rules from behind. That's an old Scythian saying.
Nice.
Is the word 'Habiru' a Sumerian word that means rulers?
Habiru - Hebrew?
'God's chosen people' that worship Yahweh who is Anu, the totaliarian SOB that enslaved humanity?
Connections
Hi, Ivan. Yes, I cover that in other episodes. Here are three, starting with the most relevant to the question: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-master-baiters
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/what-is-a-jew?
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/yahchopeeps
I definitely think that the word Hebrew in the Bible derives from the Habiru under Abdi-Ashirta, aka Abraham. The word Hyksos or Heka Khasut means foreign rulers who had infiltrated and then controlled Egypt. Habiru is more likely trespassers, as segasu is translated, or nomads and wanderers.
I look at Yahweh's relationship to Set(h) but I didn't know about Anu. Can you tell me more?
Hi Tereza, thanks for those links. I'll have a read through.
Here's a link following that explains why the author believes that Yahweh is based on the totalitarian and evil Anu, which was the supreme ruler of the Annunaki sky-gods.
All the pantheon of gods, as they jumped through time and history after the Great Flood (which seems to be the turning point), are from what I can see based on the stories in the Sumerian texts about the Annunaki sky-gods that came from 'heaven' - meaning another planet. The texts claim that they were aliens from the 12th planet.
I wonder about the alien story. It is clear from the texts and the civilization the Sumerians built after what was probably the Great Flood, that there was an advanced race of people on the planet, with advanced technology, and they had flying machines. And mankind was divided into rulers and slaves. Slaves were kept ignorant, hungry and weak - so stunted their development. Rulers lived in luxury and grew into giants. It is possible a cataclysm, like the Great Flood wiped it all out. And the collective memories of the survivors could have imagined the Annunaki as being aliens from another planet - but they could have been just an advanced race of totalitarian dictators on this one. They were constantly waging war on each other so it's possible they wiped themselves out.
All of the stories of our religions match the ancient texts. Everything found in the Bible.
All civilizations on different continents have matching stories about gods that came from the sky. All matching the Sumerian text stories. Creation myth. The Crown Monarchy System. Rulers and slaves. All the evil can be tracked back to the Annunaki and their doctrines.
This is what Eric von Daikin wrote about in his series of books starting with the Chariots of the Gods. But there are lots of people writing about it. Even Wikipedia has entries. It appears that there is so much to it that it's hard to link it all together.
But Anu is the EXACT IMAGE of both the Jews god Yahweh and what they gave us for Chrisitianity, and Islam. And the story of God drowning mankind - it's his story. He hated mankind according to the Sumerian texts.
I have come to believe that the Israelites learned all these stories in Babylon, which conquered Sumer, and took their cults and knowledge, and gods.
And so the 12 tribes of Israel after generations of learning all these secrets created a pact to rule the world their way. They made up a god, made up their myths based on the Sumerian texts - Noah and the 12 tribes - it's in the Annunaki history, the Garden of Eden, the creation story, and God being angry with mankind - But the real explanation was that Anu, the Annunaki king wanted to keep mankind as perpetual slaves, so hid from us our true origins, true potentials, kept us ignorant, hungry and weak, denied us knowledge (don't eat of the Tree of Knowledge) and denied us long live (Tree of Life) - and when mankind kept rebelling against being slaves - Anu decided to mass murder us all and depopulate the earth - he sent plagues, famines and droughts, and then drowned us out with the Great Flood.
At which point if the Annunaki were truly aliens they left the planet.
The Israelites meantime were one of the groups that were reviving civilizations based on these ancient totalitarian doctrines, and constant war to create empires and subjugate other groups to their power. In Babylon they'd learned the power of education and the power of banking, usury and debt slavery by using the Money Monopoly.
My theory is that the Israelites became a virtual Zionist Evil Empire after the Romans smashed their temple, they've infiltrated and added to their team, they created Christianity through the Cult of Mithras, and then took over the Roman Empire by becoming the Roman Catholic Church - a virtual empire of God based on religion, originating in Zion!!! There's two good books you can download free that explain the Jews created Christianity - and the hidden Zionist empire. Have you read these?
1. Solving the Mystery of Babylon the Great
2. The Secret Society of Moses
I'm getting carried away - here's that link.
https://www.woolstangray.eu/enlil-is-not-yahweh-anu-is-lets-be-done-with-the-lie-once-and-for-all/
I like the image of a pantheon of gods jumping through time and history hoops like cocker spaniels ;-)
An explanation of the great flood and giants that made sense to me was in Ireland: Land of the Pharaohs. I talk about it here: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/a-royal-flush-and-irish-pharaohs.
For the time being, I'm entertaining the possibility that "they could have been just an advanced race of totalitarian dictators on this one." I don't rule out aliens but the theory leaves us with the option of all-out war, alien witch hunts, helplessness.
I think the trajectory is reversed. In my book I begin with the simultaneous inventions of coinage/ taxation and democracy aka a pantheon of oligarchs. I show how it co-opted all of us into the conquest of our neighbors in order to protect our families--creating a cognitive dissonance among the enablers.
At the same time, these religions sprang up. The powers behind the thrones, who issued their coins, invented themselves as the voice of god, the hieros, gave themselves divine status. They then usurped all the stories and gods to fashion for their purpose.
If my theory's true, it vastly simplifies what we need to do--take back the money that's backed by housing (through the mortgage) and make it the exclusive privilege of local commonwealths, no greater than 200K people. It doesn't kill the snake, just defangs it so that our labor isn't given for free going forward. I think we should try that first.
Thanks for the link, I'll check it out!
Hi Tereza,
Thanks for that link on the Great Flood.
I absolutely agree with you that if we 'take back the money' then it is really over for this group of psychopaths, who I've renamed in recent days for my own thinking as the Zion Imperial Cult, and the Zionist Imperial Empire - which naturally is made up of the bankers, billionaires, and monarchies. All roads lead to Zion.
I used to think it was Rome.
But now I see they just took over Rome with monotheism, Judaism rebranded as Christianity.
Here's something really interesting that I came up with today about polytheism - I refuse now to call it paganism because that was the rebranding name to demean it. It turns out the polytheists of Rome thought the Israelites monotheism was 'barbarous.'
But what's really interesting is I came to this today while reading through a 1730 essay "The Natural History of Religion" by the British writer David Hume, who argues, as I've been thinking for ages, that polytheism is the oldest and most natural religion in history - And that is that polytheism was a way of valuing the BEST OF MANKIND and inspiring people to emulate it - and that monotheism cancelled it and humanity went backwards.
And they INVERTED shit!!!!
https://davidhume.org/texts/n/full
Here's a part worth reading - and some of my comments as I copied it to my flies.
So sociable is polytheism, that the utmost fierceness and antipathy, which it meets with in an opposite religion, is scarcely able to disgust it, and keep it at a distance. Augustus praised extremely the reserve of his grandson, Caius Cæsar, when this latter prince, passing by Jerusalem, deigned not to sacrifice according to the Jewish law. But for what reason did Augustus so much approve of this conduct? Only, because that religion was by the Pagans esteemed ignoble and barbarous[49].
Ivan-INVERSION – the Romans thought monotheism was BARBOROUS.
I may venture to affirm, that few corruptions of idolatry and polytheism are more pernicious to society than this corruption of theism[50], when carried to the utmost height.
The human sacrifices of the Carthaginians, Mexicans, and many barbarous nations[51], scarcely exceed the inquisition and persecutions of Rome and Madrid. For besides, that the effusion of blood may not be so great in the former case as in the latter; besides this, I say, the human victims, being chosen by lot, or by some exterior signs, affect not, in so considerable a degree, the rest of the society.
Whereas virtue, knowledge, love of liberty, are the qualities, which call down the fatal vengeance of inquisitors; and when expelled, leave the society in the most shameful ignorance, corruption, and bondage. The illegal murder of one man by a tyrant is more pernicious than the death of a thousand by pestilence, famine, or any undistinguishing calamity.
Where the deity is represented as infinitely superior to mankind, this belief, though altogether just, is apt, when joined with superstitious terror, to sink the human mind into the lowest submission and abasement, and to represent the monkish virtues of mortification, penance, humility, and passive suffering, as the only qualities which are acceptable to him.
But where the gods are conceived to be only a little superior to mankind, and to have been, many of them, advanced from that inferior rank, we are more at our ease in our addresses to them, and may even, without profaneness, aspire sometimes to a rival-ship and emulation of them.
Hence activity, spirit, courage, magnanimity, love of liberty, and all the virtues which aggrandize a people.
Ivan-oh my god. Polytheism bought out the best of mankind, which is what produced great civilizations like the Roman Empire.
The heroes in paganism correspond exactly to the saints in popery and holy dervises in Mahometanism. The place of Hercules, Theseus, Hector, Romulus, is now supplied by Dominic, Francis, Anthony, and Benedict.
Instead of the destruction of monsters, the subduing of tyrants, the defense of our native country; whippings and fastings, cowardice and humility, abject submission and slavish obedience, are become the means of obtaining celestial honours among mankind.
Ivan-all of which serves the Crown Monarchy System and SLAVERY, not the betterment of mankind. FFS.
One great incitement to the pious Alexander in his warlike expeditions was his rivalship of Hercules and Bacchus, whom he justly pretended to have excelled[53]. Brasidas, that generous and noble Spartan, after falling in battle, had heroic honours paid him by the inhabitants of Amphipolis, whose defence he had embraced[54]. And in general, all founders of states and colonies among the Greeks were raised to this inferior rank of divinity, by those who reaped the benefit of their labours.
This gave rise to the observation of Machiavel[55], that the doctrines of the Christian religion (meaning the catholic; for he knew no other) which recommend only passive courage and suffering, had subdued the spirit of mankind, and had fitted them for slavery and subjection. An observation, which would certainly be just, were there not many other circumstances in human society which control the genius and character of a religion.
Brasidas seized a mouse, and being bit by it, let it go. There is nothing so contemptible, said he, but what may be safe, if it has but courage to defend itself[56]. Whereas Bellarmine patiently and humbly allowed the fleas and other odious vermin to prey upon him. We shall have heaven, said he, to reward us for our sufferings: But these poor creatures have nothing but the enjoyment of the present life[57].
Such difference is there between the maxims of a Greek hero and a Catholic saint.
So many great points here, Ivan. I'm going to save it in a draft for a different post. Yes, inversion is the great key to unlocking the truth, which has been turned and encrypted. Thanks for reposting this interesting portion.
Tereza, wow - I am gobsmacked that you said 'So many great points here, Ivan. I'm going to save it in a draft for a different post.'
My first thought is 'THANKS for the wonderful compliment that is inherent i n your words.'
And second, please, please, please go right ahead and use anything and everything that you were inspired by to save it as a draft and make it into something that helps educate and empower our audience.
My best to you,
Ivan
Great article, thanks
I learned something new from this: "synthetic language". I discovered that it means inflected languages. I have only a smattering of experience with Latin, but more experience with Russian, which is similar to Latin in its use of inflection.
So I'm not sure that Latin being "synthetic" means that it has no roots. You have more knowledge about this, so please correct my misunderstanding.
Oh that was just my word for it, Mark. I was using synthetic as the opposite of organic and growing naturally from an indigenous language. From what I'd read, it had no root but was artificially put together. But I didn't mean it as a technical term.
Great essay, btw, on stuff. I didn't have time to comment because I was getting this out before my trip but it was something to which I can certainly relate.
Thanks for the clarification.
Latin is like English in some of the way it is composited.
Many languages are "composited" or are synthetic, by having come into contact with other languages, resulting in a spoken form that is not connected back to any original roots.
A good example is how English evolved into what we see today. Everyone knows about how different "Old English" is from today's English. Our language is a Composited one; by having gone through at least 4 distinct development periods, this is from Langster:
https://langster.org/en/blog/a-brief-history-of-the-english-language-from-old-english-to-modern-days
The Old English period (5th-11th centuries), Middle English period (11th-15th centuries), and Modern English period (16th century to present) are the three main divisions in the history of the English language. According to Langster: "The English language is a West Germanic language that 'originated' in England."
The origination point is a limited context for it's beginning however. It was spoken by "Anglo-Saxons," (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes) who settled in England in the 5th century. The Anglo-Saxons were a mix of Germanic tribes from Scandinavia and Germany. There was a distinct language spoken in the British Isles before that. Each of these sub groups spoke their own language or variants, while borrowing words from each other to gain effective interaction. Romance languages such as French, Italian, and Spanish, which evolved from Latin, have also influenced English vocabulary.
So, now Latin or "Old Roman Language" was likely influenced in a similar way. Latin was heavily influenced by both the Etruscan and Greek languages. Proto Indo European is considered an original language that most later languages can be traced back to.
It would be interesting to see what the difference is between the language of the Habiru (Hebrew) the Turkic language of the Khazars; and the Yiddish language of the Ashkenazi descendants that now control Israel. What they speak in Israel is NOT Hebrew, it is a variant of Yiddish written with Hebrew characters.
Apologies for the long analysis ;-)
Thanks, Nef. I'm also meaning to imply something more premeditated and sinister with the word synthetic, like synthetic meat. I think patriarchal rulers have infiltrated the language and embedded their spells of violence, conquest and control into our 'kitchen language,' what we use at home and among ourselves.
Yes, I completely agree. There's a lot of examples of this. It's built into colloquial and idiomatic expressions and some of our word usage. Our stories form habits, built into language. Etymology study reveals a lot of it.
Synthetic Meat is a great analogy. Definitely a sinister part of language.
Like understand = to stand under, (authority).
Understand is a great example. Such an important concept, completely usurped into a mind worm in which we bow to authority.
There are those who believe that pretty much everything we are taught about Ancient Rome is synthetic - the language, the history, the lot:
https://www.youtube.com/@BritainsHiddenHistoryRoss/search?query=gibbon
"There was a distinct language spoken in the British Isles before that." It was called the British language, now known as Welsh, one of the oldest languages in the world, a well-preserved form of Ancient Assyrian, with roots going back to Ancient Egypt (and possibly Atlantis?). The journey of the language to Britain along the migration routes from The Middle East is clearly traceable in Iberia, Etruria, Rhaetia (Switzerland), The Aegean, Trojan-Phrygia in Asia Minor and further back into Ancient Assyria and Palestine in stone inscriptions using the Coelbren/Kolbrin alphabet, which the mainstream tries to smear as an eighteenth-century fabrication. Incidentally, this also correlates to the DNA of modern Welsh people. So it stands to reason that Latin was influenced by Etruscan/Khumric.
I'm very grateful to have you, Tirion, and Nef adding this knowledge of linguistics to my comments. That's really interesting that the original British language is now called Welsh, and traces back to Assyria and Egypt. Atlantis certainly goes along with the episode on Celtic migration to Egypt for a race of red-headed giants.
Based on what I have found so far you are quite right. Welsh is known for being present for approx 4,000 years. The Basque language is another Language isolate, not related to any other language in Europe. There is evidence in Egypt that there was some form of commerce going on, maybe like a trade net work, which would have been an excellent way for language to spread and intermingle. Inevitably, there are relationships that cannot be ignored. So, I do see your point.
My sense about Egyptian is that it went through several major changes between the first and second intermediate periods. New Kingdom language would be significantly different from the Old Kingdom; this may have been due to the Usurpers the Hyksos, or it may be because of the gradual effects the language would get from trade. I have not studied Latin or Etruscan, I am sure similar forces were at work in those languages; I think Tereza is right by calling them Synthetic, because of the influences coming from Infiltration and Parasitic controllers of those cultures.
Thanks for this. I see that I was confused by the word "synthetic".