The Katy Perry angle is interesting. I did not know that Brand had been married to her before she married Bloom. No doubt she did sell her soul to the devil.
I read in 2019 that Perry replaced Madonna as the queen of occult Hollywood after Madonna, in full plain sight on live television, allegedly on behalf of humanity performed ritual magic on stage at The Eurovision Song Contest in Tel Aviv on 18May19 to kill Israel and Zion. Apparently, Madonna was angry after discovering that the Rabbis tricked her (and those before her) into using the wrong Kabbalahs in her magic, resulting in immense magical power being lost to Israel over millennia.
I have no idea whether any of that is true but it does seem to fit.
OMfG. That is so blatant and horrifying! The way she hits and brutalizes the white nightgowned girls with gas masks on. "Not everyone is coming to the future. Not everyone is learning from the past. Not everyone can come into the future. Not everybody here is gonna last." He says something about, "If you don't like somebody, let them die."
I don't believe dark magic exists but I certainly believe that people like her believe it does. There's no question, watching this, that she's taken part in pedo-sadistic rituals.
I entertain the possibility that nothing supernatural exists, and what we see is what we get, or that there is a force for good that's helping us wake up. But the idea that there are evil supernatural forces isn't useful, because it would just make me afraid and paralyzed. Plus the evidence of my own experiments, so far, tells me things are working for the better even when that's not immediately evident. I don't believe in believing--making up your mind in advance of the facts. But there are possibilities I don't consider because what's the point?
The belief in dark magic and pedo-sadistic rituals are reinforced by giving them credence, even in the realm of 'fighting against them.' If you believe they give power, then those you're fighting against will do them all the more to protect their power.
"Again, the devil took Him (Jesus) up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. And he said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.”
That passage is not figurative. The devil could not have offered it is he didn't have it.
Whether your faith is in Jesus or the dark side, faith is required for results whether good or evil.
1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
2. strong belief in God...
For example:
Matt 9:27-29 As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed him, calling out, “Have mercy on us, Son of David!”
When he had gone indoors, the blind men came to him, and he asked them, “Do you believe that I am able to do this?”
“Yes, Lord,” they replied.
Then he touched their eyes and said, “According to your faith let it be done to you”; and their sight was restored. Jesus warned them sternly, “See that no one knows about this.” But they went out and spread the news about him all over that region.
The proof shows up after faith/belief is exercised.
Okay, so you define it the same way as I use 'belief', making up your mind about something in advance of your experience. To me, that is a block against the truth because if something is true, it doesn't need your belief in order to be true. And it's trusting in the authority of those who defined God in the Bible rather than in God as the direct author of your experience. IMO. But I'm once again ignoring my own advice "Never argue with someone over their dogma."
Be that as it may, I look at it like this: anyone out there telling the truth, whether Russell Brand, you, Glenn Greenwald, Chris Bray, etc., etc., is poking holes in the massive wall of propaganda, which eventually will come tumbling down like the wall of Jericho.
Hiding in plain sight is the best place to hide things! (Well, some have said that hiding things within our hearts is the best, because we have been taught not to look there for the truth.)
Casually using a phrase like "selling your soul to the devil" is nothing more than saying you sold out to the system (temporarily) in order to cash in and make some money.
Agreed. I wouldn't have thought twice about it in a different context. But it's not like Katy's natural talent just catapulted her to making $40M a year. She was chosen and placed in that role. If you have time, watch that Madonna video. It is unbelievably sinister. And from what Katy said, it does seem like she was the one chosen to replace her.
Of course they are "chosen". Stars are manufactured by creating an image for them and promoting them. They are backed with talent (and high quality production), they are crafted to appeal to the masses.
Nothing sinister about it. Just pure profit making.
Look at Kesha. One massively successful album, then nothing because she refused to continue being abused. Silence for years to fulfill her contract, and now she is independently producing garbage.
I'm willing to bet that every single one of us has worked for some "asshole" that we might have even considered to be "evil". Early in my career, I was hired into upper management working for someone who could be considered "evil". I worked from within the system to try and help others. But sure, in a sense you could consider that as "selling out to the devil" until I finally had enough and resigned.
Tirion, could you explain this to me more. I'm going to mention it in a video but I don't know if I understand it. Rabbis gave Madonna the wrong Kabbalahs so that magical power was LOST to Israel? Why would rabbis do that? And Madonna was then doing ritual magic to kill Israel and Zion?
I'm not sure of the players here. Zion is behind the pedosadist ritual magic in Hollywood, yes? Wouldn't both the Rabbis and Madonna then be working for them? Links please.
Sep 25, 2023·edited Sep 25, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Tereza, this seems to be a very wide and deep rabbit hole, if I can call it that. I don't pretend to understand it, or to know whether any of it is true; but it is certainly interesting. I am fairly sure that the notes from which the information in my earlier comment came relate to this video:
It's one of a series made by Tim Rifat, who claims to be the Ipsissimus. IIRC, he claims to use his alleged magical powers to attack/destroy humanity's predators. I remember he has a special hatred for the Rothschilds. Whether he is fake or real, a grifter or just a nutter, I do not know!
Hola, Tereza. I really enjoyed this, and that you have the courage to look at this kind of criticism of a 'hero' and to really look deeply at it. That you took the time, and had nightmares, suggests to me that you have kept Russell on the earth, and haven't pedestal-ed him, so-to-speak.
I haven't watched him consistently enough to make any cogent comments beyond that, and that what I have watched struck me as truthful. I watched him talking about his recovery from addiction, which has as perhaps its most important characteristic, truthfulness. My 'feeling' is that Russell took that cornerstone of health seriously and is consistently looking towards the truth of himself and society. Integrity, in the yogic jargon.
Wasn't the child snatcher a character that predates Disney? The Pinocchio book, if memory serves. With my changed eyes, it might be time to actually re-read the book. (I've not actually seen the movie.) Likely it is a psyop / predictive programming book, I'm thinking. (Like The Wizard of Oz, of course.)
Thank you, Guy. Yes, I've had to fight myself in both directions--not making him into a hero and not resenting him when I was paying so much attention to him and he barely knew who I was! There is something wacky about the non-reciprocal nature of celebrity. When we redesign the world, I think we need to design it out.
I'm glad to have the confirmation of your intuition on Russell.
I kept writing child snatcher and having to correct it to catcher, which is the Chitty version. But you're right that Pinocchio had a child snatcher. It's certainly the common stuff of nightmares and scary stories. There's a very dark film out on Pinocchio my daughter tells me.
Unless you know something I don't, I thought the Wizard of Oz was political commentary on the 'free silver' movement to elect Williams Bryant Jennings.
Sep 24, 2023·edited Sep 24, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
I came across this old quotation, synchronicity-like, while looking for something else (for my next essay). It applies here:
The hero is the man actively engaged in becoming himself – never a very reassuring sight. The villain, on the other hand, has already become something.
Alas, it is completely out of context from my next essay. It was an 'accidental' find while looking for something else. I found it, I suspect, as a synchronicity to go along with your look at the hero-Brand. (The Branded hero as grounded human?)
It was another of those great quotations I had up on my office's wall.
I have not watched any of embedded videos yet but some your comments warrant a thought out and measured response.
Meanwhile, Wizard of Oz (stolen from another post):-
I wonder of there is a single man: or woman: over the age of say 30, that has not watched The Wizard of Oz movie?
Not many would be my guess, as a young boy i have watched it many times, especially during the festival of Saturnalia, more commonly referred to as Christmas;
What does this movie tell us though? Actually there is 1 scene (still in the movie) that you can see the body of an extra hanging in the background after committing suicide on set;
Less gruesome maybe, but what does Oz stand for? Ounces of course and they are talking about ounces of gold;
Why gold? The yellow brick road of course, it s referring to gold ingots;
Where does the road lead to?
The Federal Reserve, where the gold was held and that printed the money;
Who was in the film?
Flying monkeys, all the corporate agents like police (clowns in costumes), Tax agents etc etc;
The Tin Man = Tax Identification Number;
Strawman = Your clone, the fake you but with No Brain as they believe we are all stupid;
Cowardly Lion = all fake government agents who growl, but are cowards when faced with the truth;
What else, Dorothy's slippers were ruby slippers but in the original script they were silver, gold and silver have always been classed as money and a valuable asset;
The wizard is all smoke and mirrors, loud noise and never seen, but once exposed he has no power;
What does the good witch say to Dorothy? "You always had the power" Because we always have the power, we just need to realise it and stop being afraid of flying.
I talk about the WoZ (not grammatically correct but more fun) in this episode on the Populists: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/thomas-frank-misses-the-point-on. The farmer movement / populists, of which L. Frank Baum was one, were supporting William Jennings Bryan (the Cowardly Lion) for President on a platform of 'free silver,' which meant monetizing silver--which was plentiful--in addition to gold. The scarecrow was the farmers, the tin man the miners. Kansas was where the movement started, which tillage for monocropping had turned into the dust bowl.
The poppy fields were the Opium Wars of the East India Company. And yes, absolutely, the yellow brick road was the gold standard, leading to the smoke and mirrors wizard. WJB gave the roaring 'Cross of Gold' speech, but then didn't have the courage of his convictions.
They made the point that, if you have producers and consumers but a lack of money to join them, it's like saying you can't build a house because you lack inches. It's just a measurement of exchange. But in our case, it's an empire chip to distribute the spoils of war and looting. That's what my caret system replaces, which I'll be writing more about soon (and is the topic of my book).
Thank you Tereza. Had only briefly heard about the Bryan thing years ago and dismissed / ignored it as not important or interesting to my old self. Will read the article too xxx
Yes, you are correct, and I was a bit sloppy there. I was primarily referring to what I remember as the 2nd book in the series. Which I read many many years ago. After reading the 2nd book, and with hindsight, I think that both are a kind of multi-dimensional psyop. I am open to being corrected.
Especially because when I went to find the second book, in memory from so long ago, there is a rather confused mishmash of books by Frank L. Baum in a long series. So, now I'm not sure and to clarify that would take time to research I don't have time to do at this time. So... more an open question now, than anything viable asserted.
The movie "Return to Oz" is really interesting, though. Have you seen it?
It's good to be sharing both the elevated plains with you and the depths, since you were the one to tell me about Anneke. Yes 'once you have eyes to see'!
Also I had interactions with them as I had to fight them off which I could due to my Qi Gong practice.
Which means they aren't all powerful and they cannot use people with a strong mind and a strong will.
They prey on the weak.
The Occult... and I been a Goth... wants you to be willingly posessed by them...
You have to open your mind body and soul to be possessed by Lucifer... the bringer of light... the Angel of death... with the death of the Spirit being the first causality.
I don't know if you seen this Video about Angelina Jolie...
When Angelina Jolie was 23, a friend videotaped her describing in detail, her illuminati initiation ritual, which includes violent sexual torture, gang rape, and apparently, a snake.
Now in those Rituals the possessed get a tattoo from them demons so they are marked... branded if you will... the willingly possessed.
The occult likes "Hell-raisers" like Russell Brand because they can be manipulated... but soon as they speak out just like him they are being destroyed because of the things that got them into their position in the first place.
You will never be successful if you don't sell out to them because they control Money Media Government.
So what do they want and who are they really?
They are an Alien Race that exists without the need of a physical Body.
They created us as a portal to enter this world.
Here is the Catch.
They cannot control the Human Spirit.
Their natural environment is a high energy environment... they live in the sun.
This is why they want to set the world on fire... it is their natural habitat.
Which means if they succeed we all die... this is why blood sacrifice and the death of the Human spirit is central to them.
Always remember... your weakness is your strength.
Fritz! I will read your articles and watch the Angelina Jolie video later, very interesting stuff. But on a different note, I was talking about you in a comment on Jonathan Reese's What Do I No? https://whatdoino.substack.com/p/finding-joy-among-the-skullduggery. Besides a pure delight of an article, he ends with math and tesselation. This reminded me of you teaching me the genius of Vedic Mathematics. You may already know Jonathan but it seems you have common ground/ passions. More later when I've had a chance to delve in.
good piece. Now I got to scramble and see who is this Skeleton-laden, Mira Hindley.
The angelina vid looks edited a bit, but is not far from truth. See one of the user comments (2 or 3 down). Fritz - thanks for the reminder of the Spirit.
To you and Fritz, I couldn't find the Angelina Jolie when I was making my video on Hollywood & PedoSadist Cults (forgot to expand the comment). But I'll include it in the Substack version that will link to Rumble since YT has taken it down with a one-week moratorium on posting. So you know it's on to something! Here's the Rumble version: https://rumble.com/v3kigkz-hollywood-and-pedosadist-cults.html.
Russell Brand is most likely being targeted. There is a high possibility that those responsible are part of the Pilgrim Society, or at least the "Social Media Arm" of that franchise. They work to coordinate narratives of such things as "Safe and Effective" for vaccine pushes as one example. They have created the thing once known as the "Journ 'O' List," database for approved catch phrases; ever notice the catch phrases being used with surprising repetition? Things like: "Questioning the Election is very dangerous for our Democracy." These are the same people who coordinate Censorship with the "Misinformation" tag. Their efforts have been central in the "Cancel Culture." Here is a link to an article describing them:
You could think of these as the Parasitic Elite's media outreach department, working closely with the main Parasites that operate out of the City of London, the outreach effort is directed at both the National Governments and the Private Corporate Chains of Custody. Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity own nearly all of the voting stock of all Legacy Media as well as Social Media Platforms. CEO's of those major Corporations must follow priorities mentioned to them by guys like Larry Fink. Russell is in their cross hairs because someone is getting too uncomfortable. I'm sure it is not Viscount Alfred Milner, maybe it could be one of his descendants.
As for Russell, I can say everyone deserves a chance to evolve past whatever created psychological havoc from bad experiences, who knows? He is possibly stronger for resetting his life and getting out of a bad circumstance. If there is something that I missed, I apologize in advance as I have not followed Russell too closely.
I learn so much from you, Nefahotep! The PE's PR (parasitic elite). It had to exist. I remember reading that the Republican party had very thick binders with established arguments and catch phrases for every point. The Democrats were like trying to herd cats with as many agendas as there were people in the room. But maybe those were two sides of the same psyops and the divisions in the left were as much planned narratives as the right.
I'll read your links with interest. Yes I agree that Russell is in the crosshairs because of something that's more personal to somebody than just the Covid narrative, even. I think the result of this is that he'll be left with no reason to guard his speech, because they've taken away all the bribes and used up all their threats (other than physical harm, and I don't think they'll go there for strategic, not moral, reasons.) And that will be good for all of us.
So much of this is hilarious. People need to get a life and stop imagining so many crazy ideas. If the system is trying to cancel him, then it might be time to start paying attention to him.
It's good to look at the many angles; turn it this way, then that, and yet another. Kaleidoscopic.
I see most people as in the process of becoming themselves, ongoing iterations. Often an unconscious process. The pace is both linked to the times (speeding up now) but also individuated. Russell hits me as someone who moves through these iterations quickly, (to some degree) consciously (with blindspots) and complicating things, publicly. I don't envy that.
He reflects many things for those who pay attention to him. We project so much on public figures we inevitably lose sight of 'them' in the process.
I've been many people (identities) in my life, though maintained some essential I-ness throughout, like everyone.
I would not enjoy the reconstruction of my life (impossible) narrated and projected onto screens by people (with agenda). What a f'ing drag. I know he put himself in the public sphere. I know he's enjoyed many benefits from that, but still, it looks like ritual sacrifice to me and it's sad.
I can not find it in myself to think RB is a 'bad' guy. Can't find it. And maybe that has absolutely nothing to do with him at all.
Even if it's true he was pulled into the operating 'cult' of entertainment, I have sympathy for those who want out. He's in service to everyone especially right now as his being targeted will bring much more into public awareness -including the existence of the illuminati or whatever other stupid name they call themselves.
What a nuanced reply, Kathleen. I think you read and 'liked' Guy's quote "The hero is the man actively engaged in becoming himself – never a very reassuring sight. The villain, on the other hand, has already become something." I myself am VERY happy to have not become famous in this or any previous iterations of my life. Very messy!
I might add to Guy's quote that villains are not fixed entities either. The closer I look at them, the more they shift shape.
Maintaining some 'essential-ness' is an interesting concept. I think that's why I've been curious to go back to iterations of Russell that I never paid attention to at the time. What I think appeals to Gina, my dance teacher, is an authenticity and playfulness in Russell's parody of himself. Gina's classes are a form of therapy where people bring their fully flawed selves because she's so ruthlessly honest about herself. And Russell always seems like he's trying to be honest with himself, whether that makes him popular or not.
Yes I did read Guy's comment. And I agree with your added thoughts too.
Re the essential bits - I remember reading Gurdjeff on this point. They are present in childhood and they are seen throughout one's life. He gave some kind of practice in identifying one's own. They are important in the context of our how we can best navigate our lives, using the gifts we arrived with. (And their underbelly).
I could certainly see playfulness, irreverence and a quick intelligence in Russell's. All of those qualities are strengths and all of them can become negatives too. With the entertainment industry he's playing in a very distorted, influential and ultimately dangerous playground! I imagine traps were laid long ago, well before he could grok the significance.
Sounds like a fun class! I'm a bit envious. Appreciate you back!!
I know what you mean. Since watching Anneke Lucas and reading Whitney Webb, I can't dismiss anything as impossible. The Deep Thought video suggested that Russell might be her handler but it could be the other way around. Maybe he was her 'assignment.' Keeping him roped in and performing in their subconscious triggering pageantry.
A friend was telling me that there are telltale seizures that people have from cannibalism and that some celebrities and politicians had shown the signs. I asked if that could be the vaxx but she said it was before that.
Was it called Out of Shadows? I just watched that because JimyChanga linked it since it was just banned from YT. With a stunt man narrating? I'm going to do a piece on it later today: https://www.outofshadows.org/.
"My question in return is “What are we trusting him for? To think for us?” The answer to that is always no."
---------
Exactly. The same reason I was sticking up for Alex Jones -- not because I agree with what he says, but because I know that they were NEVER going to stop at him.
And your phrase in your article was excellent: "Comes at a time when he's re-Branded himself (lol) from a drugged out playboy to well-known attacker of government narratives."
I'm glad you're staying on the story too. From one of your links, I thought this was interesting: "This all comes after allegations surfaced, solicited by The Times, from women who claim Brand mistreated them in the past. Three of the women were anonymous, while one was an ex-girlfriend. The women stated that they had no plans to come forward with the allegations until they were contacted by The Times, and that it was in large part due to Brand's new success that they chose to speak out."
yep that is exactly the video (third you mention) i sent you, but i got the longer version with more story's. like the disgusting thing he did in the bathroom when a young man in is debut he was. Funny how your statement assets or illuminati, is near mine said a few hours ago on your last post...puppets or puppeter. And now I would like here to debate some of these said subject:
1. about auditing for the one finaly finding her, the russel brand exposed video i never seen so thank you for that. heres my thought: twice in the interview when ask question he diverts it while pushing is body over the table towards larry king. Just weird and the question never answered. Also at 7min11 he ask if their is photo of the wedding. russel answer no and not sell.... here is the picture and the high cost price.
...and talk about a fail, after so many try out and dedication to find THE one it gets no better then 14 months and a happy family for that break up. i also find weird they married in india, where the rashi are's and the first MKultra sex gooroo addict mind controlled happened. what many with the obey sign obersved trought that video.
2. About the pied piper book, the story is not only he looks like it, he wrote the book he literaly incarnates the personality, in is show about disney child-catcher. they are the same as pan is the mythology of it. I understand actor dont choose the role, but writers do chose the words and structure of all their books no?
3. lastly, about sex and is thirst of it. I would compare russel brand to grigory raspoutine, more he feeds on woman or man, the more he developped is charm like some succubus (by the way they arent female they male turning to female turning back to male androgenous being supposedly) so from what i studied, kundalini is key in that. Its pretty occult masonic and bad seen, but i'd say their is two way for it. one is holding it in and dispersing your own energy trought your body tantric, and the other is awakening the serpent and what these pedosatanistcultist do. in wich way would russel brand be? Is russel brand having a sane sexuality and promoting sane sexuality to the young one? or do he amplifies the hippie fever like stars are use to? - point 3 is all personal opinion
i hope you will appreciate my comments as much as i appreciate your substack. Cause i do even if we have different point of view for now( either i'll convince you or you will convince me, we both seem flexible mind). Here is another link about vandana shiva its someone who went to school with her and if you dig far into indian culture you see she is for india what greta thunberg is to davos lol.
What I was glad to find in your initial comment was that you'd also listened to a lot of Russell's Luminary podcasts and shows from the last 5 years. I was happy to talk to someone (other than the many readers who initially found me through our common link to Russell) who was not stereotyping him based on the character he played over a decade ago.
Yet all of your examples from 1-3 are from that era. What did you find interesting enough about Russell that made you devote many hours to listening to him? Unlike me, Math wouldn't accuse you of being swayed by his sexual charisma. So what was it?
With Russell, when I finally came to the conclusion that he was captured or complicit, it mattered because his purpose was to control the opposition and lead us back into the slaughterhouse by a different route, as I explain for someone else on this: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malone-and-slaughterhouse-four
I stopped listening to him because of his associations with people like Tucker Carlson, Tulsi Gabbard, and others I saw as shilling for Trump. But now, that seems to be in vogue! So I guess we'll find out soon enough if these are all controlled opposition or true opposition.
My mentor John Michael Greer is a 33rd degree Mason. He has discussed that many times. He considers the current Mason order to be a lot like modern Christian churches where the magic of rituals has been gutted and are quite benign/boring now. Masonry now is mostly just a fraternal community of men who raise money to help the community, not unlike the Elks or even the VFW.
A subscriber of mine posted that video, I watched until that point and then turned it off, assuming the rest of it would be grossly exaggerated like that.
Very interesting and sinister. You've clearly done considerable homework Tereza. Can't fully grasp the magnitude of all this tbh...feels quite other worldly to me. Neither can I ponder it too much presently...such a heaviness, oppressiveness about the reach/power of it that leaves me deeply unsettled, saddened and perhaps a bit overwhelmed. Quite new to this learning. Thank you Tereza.
Haha, I don't know that heaviness, oppressiveness, deeply unsettled, saddened and overwhelmed is much of a gift to thank me for. :-) I will be doing more soon on solutions, I promise. I woke up this morning realizing that I'm ingesting a lot of poison in order to build up my immunity to it. A true inoculation. We all are. So take the other side seriously too--what I'm saying about spirituality and that we're being held safe within a purpose that's now coming into being. That purpose is benevolent. You're the right person in the right time at the right place with the right skills and you know what to do, as Charles Eisenstein says. Be kind and indulgent towards yourself wherever possible. Eat chocolate, take baths, do nothing a lot.
Really appreciate that you went deeper on this. I still haven’t the opportunity to watch those Russel Brand videos that were suggested. I have to reconcile that I’m into the exploration of it all and it’s ok not to be completely sure of everything. The best we can do is to expand understanding around a topic from folks whose perspective resonates. I really like what you bring to the table. I enjoy how you envision solutions and how you connect dots across different genres. Thanks, Tereza!
I tried to an honest view presenting their points so you wouldn't need to watch them. From the responses of the people who'd recommended them, I think I did that. Thank you, Tonika!
I think it could be more a sign of being 'owned' than being a member. That's why I'd distinguish between an asset and a member. For Russell, he says that it's the age at which Jesus died, and he also has a crucifix tattoo. But also the age that he thought he'd die. He says it always makes him happy to look at it now. I feel like Hollywood is all a death cult, worshiping fame. But I wonder now if Russell subconsciously sabotaged himself as a way out. I've seen people often do that with jobs. They can't quit but they can get themselves fired.
Oh I didn't mean now, I meant back during his Hollywood daze. It seems like he often said things that got him kicked off places. Maybe being a bad asset to the Illuminati. Until his resurgence in the 'pandemic' he was said to be all washed up.
If the enemy of my many enemies is my friend, then surely Russell Brand is my friend. I don't agree with everything he says, but by and large he's on the money. It's a war of the The Elites vs. all the rest of us, and as long as they keep us squabbling among ourselves they keep laughing (at us) all the way to the bank. Propaganda and distractions is all they have.
I think the reason it’s ok to cancel someone over an allegation, is they are prepping everyone who dared to wrong think. Letting us all know what will happen if we speak up
Not sure if you read my article. He was married to Katy Perry for 14 mos. and filed for divorce NYE 2011, letting her know by text. If he was in 'the big club,' he left it in a way that allowed no going back. All of these allegations were solicited by the media 10-20 yrs after they supposedly happened. If he wasn't making someone very uncomfortable now, as Nefahotep says, he wouldn't be in the crosshairs. And who's coming after him? I suspect it's the same people you name as the powers-that-shouldn't-be. So you should care.
I recently saw a video that explained very simply that everything we learned about WWII is a lie. It was almost as big a psy-op as Covid-19. It may even have been you.
Outside of math related material, almost everything we were taught and the great bulk of what we hear is a myth to one degree or another. Furthermore, the depth and breadth of the bollocks out there is as pervasive, astonishing and fascinating as it is enduring, and as far as I can tell it's always been that way.
The Brand brouhaha solved by Mathis. Some examples.:
Given who is running the world, your best guess should always be that the mainstream story is false and that the hidden truth points right at the usual suspects.
History is little more than a litany of skullduggery, always perpetrated by the same black-hearted families. With only a little digging, we have found them hunkered below every atrocity ever recorded. With only a few exceptions, we can now spot them from just a name and a nose. As Princess Leia said, we can smell their foul stench from a mile away. It hangs in the air and no wind will blow it away.
This is all another managed event, of course, since Brand is of the families. Yes, he has been on the right side of some issues recently, but that is all controlled opposition.
Again, it proves what you are told by the mainstream media is garbage, on all topics. It is beyond clownworld…
You will say my views are also guided in the same way, but that is doubtful since I don't believe anything I see online. I don't even look at mainstream coverage of anything, and most of the alternative coverage doesn't impress me, either.
Hi, Goeff. I'll look at this again but I did examine it when you posted it before. There's some of the Mathis genealogy that I think is spot on but I thought this one was far-fetched. There's been no one coming forward with a story that Russell was secretly wealthy rather than dirt poor with an abusive stepdad. But maybe I'm wrong. I'll look at it again.
T, I don't think I posted this one previously since he just published it and there are some other points that though not related, are nevertheless interesing vis a vis our general predicament.
Oh sorry Geoff, it was the genealogy of Russell that he links in here you sent before. I reread that one too. There are credible things in it. Yet they still come down to guilt-by-association or guilt-by-genealogy. It would be quite the cover for a gay man to be 'Shagger of the Year' and married twice, with a third baby on the way. That seems like an awful lot of first-hand witnesses to keep quiet. I've seen him flirt with men more than women on his podcasts but in such an over-the-top way that I see them being 'safe' for a reformed shagger. On zoom calls he's been effusively complimentary to bizarre looking old guys along with saying I looked 'magnificent.' It didn't go to my head (too much) because it's just who he is.
Miles, who's very funny, btw, sees the end game as boosting Russell's viewers because he thinks the numbers are made-up. I'm not sure whether that's from a low opinion of Russell or the rest of us--probably both. I found him the ONLY person worth listening to during the CovidCon, and I don't think anyone would call me naive.
And the end-game is to get us to censor ourselves believing that we can be taken down without trial or evidence. Is Miles that naive? Do I think there's anywhere I can appeal YT taking down my last video or if they choose to remove my channel? Really Miles? I do think it's possible he's right about Russell being part of the peerage and the poor background has been fabricated. And I definitely think he's right about Fairley and Russell being instruments of the cult. But I still think this is retaliation for trying to get out. But I'm keeping an open mind.
No problem. Most of this stuff I'll never know the answer to if there is one (or more). As for Mathis, he certainly seems to be a mixed bag but some of his stuff seems interesting, but in the end , who knows?
Not at all! Miles is definitely doing research that's important to know. And it's happened before that I've rejected something only to view the subject again and say, "OMG, how did I miss that?" So I'm not dismissing it.
I wonder how far this story goes. John St Julien has a frightening hypothesis with this "Russell Brand - Establishment Wolf In Sheep's Clothing Or Man Of The People" After listening/watching this most narratives are faliing apart and I am left in limbo.
The Katy Perry angle is interesting. I did not know that Brand had been married to her before she married Bloom. No doubt she did sell her soul to the devil.
I read in 2019 that Perry replaced Madonna as the queen of occult Hollywood after Madonna, in full plain sight on live television, allegedly on behalf of humanity performed ritual magic on stage at The Eurovision Song Contest in Tel Aviv on 18May19 to kill Israel and Zion. Apparently, Madonna was angry after discovering that the Rabbis tricked her (and those before her) into using the wrong Kabbalahs in her magic, resulting in immense magical power being lost to Israel over millennia.
I have no idea whether any of that is true but it does seem to fit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG3WkiL0d_U
OMfG. That is so blatant and horrifying! The way she hits and brutalizes the white nightgowned girls with gas masks on. "Not everyone is coming to the future. Not everyone is learning from the past. Not everyone can come into the future. Not everybody here is gonna last." He says something about, "If you don't like somebody, let them die."
I don't believe dark magic exists but I certainly believe that people like her believe it does. There's no question, watching this, that she's taken part in pedo-sadistic rituals.
Yes, well, if it's true that she was the occult queen of Hollywood, I'm sure she's done it all :(
When you say "I don't believe dark magic exists...", do you mean that it does not exist separately from other sorts of magic, or...?
I entertain the possibility that nothing supernatural exists, and what we see is what we get, or that there is a force for good that's helping us wake up. But the idea that there are evil supernatural forces isn't useful, because it would just make me afraid and paralyzed. Plus the evidence of my own experiments, so far, tells me things are working for the better even when that's not immediately evident. I don't believe in believing--making up your mind in advance of the facts. But there are possibilities I don't consider because what's the point?
The belief in dark magic and pedo-sadistic rituals are reinforced by giving them credence, even in the realm of 'fighting against them.' If you believe they give power, then those you're fighting against will do them all the more to protect their power.
I see what you mean. You have a great way of explaining things, Tereza. Thank you.
Matthew 4:8,9
"Again, the devil took Him (Jesus) up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. And he said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.”
That passage is not figurative. The devil could not have offered it is he didn't have it.
Whether your faith is in Jesus or the dark side, faith is required for results whether good or evil.
Define faith, Mulheisen?
Dictionary
1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
2. strong belief in God...
For example:
Matt 9:27-29 As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed him, calling out, “Have mercy on us, Son of David!”
When he had gone indoors, the blind men came to him, and he asked them, “Do you believe that I am able to do this?”
“Yes, Lord,” they replied.
Then he touched their eyes and said, “According to your faith let it be done to you”; and their sight was restored. Jesus warned them sternly, “See that no one knows about this.” But they went out and spread the news about him all over that region.
The proof shows up after faith/belief is exercised.
Okay, so you define it the same way as I use 'belief', making up your mind about something in advance of your experience. To me, that is a block against the truth because if something is true, it doesn't need your belief in order to be true. And it's trusting in the authority of those who defined God in the Bible rather than in God as the direct author of your experience. IMO. But I'm once again ignoring my own advice "Never argue with someone over their dogma."
Be that as it may, I look at it like this: anyone out there telling the truth, whether Russell Brand, you, Glenn Greenwald, Chris Bray, etc., etc., is poking holes in the massive wall of propaganda, which eventually will come tumbling down like the wall of Jericho.
Wow is not strong enough!
Hiding in plain sight is the best place to hide things! (Well, some have said that hiding things within our hearts is the best, because we have been taught not to look there for the truth.)
Thank you for sharing.
Casually using a phrase like "selling your soul to the devil" is nothing more than saying you sold out to the system (temporarily) in order to cash in and make some money.
Agreed. I wouldn't have thought twice about it in a different context. But it's not like Katy's natural talent just catapulted her to making $40M a year. She was chosen and placed in that role. If you have time, watch that Madonna video. It is unbelievably sinister. And from what Katy said, it does seem like she was the one chosen to replace her.
Of course they are "chosen". Stars are manufactured by creating an image for them and promoting them. They are backed with talent (and high quality production), they are crafted to appeal to the masses.
Nothing sinister about it. Just pure profit making.
Look at Kesha. One massively successful album, then nothing because she refused to continue being abused. Silence for years to fulfill her contract, and now she is independently producing garbage.
I'm willing to bet that every single one of us has worked for some "asshole" that we might have even considered to be "evil". Early in my career, I was hired into upper management working for someone who could be considered "evil". I worked from within the system to try and help others. But sure, in a sense you could consider that as "selling out to the devil" until I finally had enough and resigned.
Tirion, could you explain this to me more. I'm going to mention it in a video but I don't know if I understand it. Rabbis gave Madonna the wrong Kabbalahs so that magical power was LOST to Israel? Why would rabbis do that? And Madonna was then doing ritual magic to kill Israel and Zion?
I'm not sure of the players here. Zion is behind the pedosadist ritual magic in Hollywood, yes? Wouldn't both the Rabbis and Madonna then be working for them? Links please.
Tereza, this seems to be a very wide and deep rabbit hole, if I can call it that. I don't pretend to understand it, or to know whether any of it is true; but it is certainly interesting. I am fairly sure that the notes from which the information in my earlier comment came relate to this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuGtJYPxTeM.
It's one of a series made by Tim Rifat, who claims to be the Ipsissimus. IIRC, he claims to use his alleged magical powers to attack/destroy humanity's predators. I remember he has a special hatred for the Rothschilds. Whether he is fake or real, a grifter or just a nutter, I do not know!
Hola, Tereza. I really enjoyed this, and that you have the courage to look at this kind of criticism of a 'hero' and to really look deeply at it. That you took the time, and had nightmares, suggests to me that you have kept Russell on the earth, and haven't pedestal-ed him, so-to-speak.
I haven't watched him consistently enough to make any cogent comments beyond that, and that what I have watched struck me as truthful. I watched him talking about his recovery from addiction, which has as perhaps its most important characteristic, truthfulness. My 'feeling' is that Russell took that cornerstone of health seriously and is consistently looking towards the truth of himself and society. Integrity, in the yogic jargon.
Wasn't the child snatcher a character that predates Disney? The Pinocchio book, if memory serves. With my changed eyes, it might be time to actually re-read the book. (I've not actually seen the movie.) Likely it is a psyop / predictive programming book, I'm thinking. (Like The Wizard of Oz, of course.)
Great essay! Thank you.
Thank you, Guy. Yes, I've had to fight myself in both directions--not making him into a hero and not resenting him when I was paying so much attention to him and he barely knew who I was! There is something wacky about the non-reciprocal nature of celebrity. When we redesign the world, I think we need to design it out.
I'm glad to have the confirmation of your intuition on Russell.
I kept writing child snatcher and having to correct it to catcher, which is the Chitty version. But you're right that Pinocchio had a child snatcher. It's certainly the common stuff of nightmares and scary stories. There's a very dark film out on Pinocchio my daughter tells me.
Unless you know something I don't, I thought the Wizard of Oz was political commentary on the 'free silver' movement to elect Williams Bryant Jennings.
I came across this old quotation, synchronicity-like, while looking for something else (for my next essay). It applies here:
The hero is the man actively engaged in becoming himself – never a very reassuring sight. The villain, on the other hand, has already become something.
Donald Richie. The Films of Akira Kurosawa. University of California Press, © 1984 by The Regents of the University of California. Cited in The Last Samurai by Helen Dewitt, New York: Hyperion Books, 2000; ISBN 0-7868-6668-3, pg.235
The Dewitt book is top drawer, imo. A fantastic read.
What a fantastic quote! I love that and look forward to its context in your next piece.
Alas, it is completely out of context from my next essay. It was an 'accidental' find while looking for something else. I found it, I suspect, as a synchronicity to go along with your look at the hero-Brand. (The Branded hero as grounded human?)
It was another of those great quotations I had up on my office's wall.
I have not watched any of embedded videos yet but some your comments warrant a thought out and measured response.
Meanwhile, Wizard of Oz (stolen from another post):-
I wonder of there is a single man: or woman: over the age of say 30, that has not watched The Wizard of Oz movie?
Not many would be my guess, as a young boy i have watched it many times, especially during the festival of Saturnalia, more commonly referred to as Christmas;
What does this movie tell us though? Actually there is 1 scene (still in the movie) that you can see the body of an extra hanging in the background after committing suicide on set;
Less gruesome maybe, but what does Oz stand for? Ounces of course and they are talking about ounces of gold;
Why gold? The yellow brick road of course, it s referring to gold ingots;
Where does the road lead to?
The Federal Reserve, where the gold was held and that printed the money;
Who was in the film?
Flying monkeys, all the corporate agents like police (clowns in costumes), Tax agents etc etc;
The Tin Man = Tax Identification Number;
Strawman = Your clone, the fake you but with No Brain as they believe we are all stupid;
Cowardly Lion = all fake government agents who growl, but are cowards when faced with the truth;
What else, Dorothy's slippers were ruby slippers but in the original script they were silver, gold and silver have always been classed as money and a valuable asset;
The wizard is all smoke and mirrors, loud noise and never seen, but once exposed he has no power;
What does the good witch say to Dorothy? "You always had the power" Because we always have the power, we just need to realise it and stop being afraid of flying.
I talk about the WoZ (not grammatically correct but more fun) in this episode on the Populists: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/thomas-frank-misses-the-point-on. The farmer movement / populists, of which L. Frank Baum was one, were supporting William Jennings Bryan (the Cowardly Lion) for President on a platform of 'free silver,' which meant monetizing silver--which was plentiful--in addition to gold. The scarecrow was the farmers, the tin man the miners. Kansas was where the movement started, which tillage for monocropping had turned into the dust bowl.
The poppy fields were the Opium Wars of the East India Company. And yes, absolutely, the yellow brick road was the gold standard, leading to the smoke and mirrors wizard. WJB gave the roaring 'Cross of Gold' speech, but then didn't have the courage of his convictions.
They made the point that, if you have producers and consumers but a lack of money to join them, it's like saying you can't build a house because you lack inches. It's just a measurement of exchange. But in our case, it's an empire chip to distribute the spoils of war and looting. That's what my caret system replaces, which I'll be writing more about soon (and is the topic of my book).
Thank you Tereza. Had only briefly heard about the Bryan thing years ago and dismissed / ignored it as not important or interesting to my old self. Will read the article too xxx
Was fascinated by this reply Paul.
Re Wizard of Oz.
Yes, you are correct, and I was a bit sloppy there. I was primarily referring to what I remember as the 2nd book in the series. Which I read many many years ago. After reading the 2nd book, and with hindsight, I think that both are a kind of multi-dimensional psyop. I am open to being corrected.
Especially because when I went to find the second book, in memory from so long ago, there is a rather confused mishmash of books by Frank L. Baum in a long series. So, now I'm not sure and to clarify that would take time to research I don't have time to do at this time. So... more an open question now, than anything viable asserted.
The movie "Return to Oz" is really interesting, though. Have you seen it?
From imDB https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089908/
It is adapted from the Frank L. Baum books *The Marvellous Land of Oz* and *Ozma of Oz*.
Likely it is the book *The Marvelous Land of Oz* that I am remembering from above.
Again, thank you for looking under our rocks and in our social shadows. The Madonna video is... shocking, once you have eyes to see!
It's good to be sharing both the elevated plains with you and the depths, since you were the one to tell me about Anneke. Yes 'once you have eyes to see'!
Very good take on this...
If i may...
The word illuminati comes from "Those who came down to set this world on Fire".
Who are they?
Dragons (Angels Demons...) what are Dragons?... Energy beings.
How do I know they exist?
I made a picture of one by sheer accident!.
You can see it here where I wrote about this.
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/the-enemy-within
It is the enemy within.
Also I had interactions with them as I had to fight them off which I could due to my Qi Gong practice.
Which means they aren't all powerful and they cannot use people with a strong mind and a strong will.
They prey on the weak.
The Occult... and I been a Goth... wants you to be willingly posessed by them...
You have to open your mind body and soul to be possessed by Lucifer... the bringer of light... the Angel of death... with the death of the Spirit being the first causality.
I don't know if you seen this Video about Angelina Jolie...
When Angelina Jolie was 23, a friend videotaped her describing in detail, her illuminati initiation ritual, which includes violent sexual torture, gang rape, and apparently, a snake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WmcRN1LJK4
Now in those Rituals the possessed get a tattoo from them demons so they are marked... branded if you will... the willingly possessed.
The occult likes "Hell-raisers" like Russell Brand because they can be manipulated... but soon as they speak out just like him they are being destroyed because of the things that got them into their position in the first place.
You will never be successful if you don't sell out to them because they control Money Media Government.
So what do they want and who are they really?
They are an Alien Race that exists without the need of a physical Body.
They created us as a portal to enter this world.
Here is the Catch.
They cannot control the Human Spirit.
Their natural environment is a high energy environment... they live in the sun.
This is why they want to set the world on fire... it is their natural habitat.
Which means if they succeed we all die... this is why blood sacrifice and the death of the Human spirit is central to them.
Always remember... your weakness is your strength.
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/your-weakness-is-your-strength
Fritz! I will read your articles and watch the Angelina Jolie video later, very interesting stuff. But on a different note, I was talking about you in a comment on Jonathan Reese's What Do I No? https://whatdoino.substack.com/p/finding-joy-among-the-skullduggery. Besides a pure delight of an article, he ends with math and tesselation. This reminded me of you teaching me the genius of Vedic Mathematics. You may already know Jonathan but it seems you have common ground/ passions. More later when I've had a chance to delve in.
Fritz is fascinating and out there. We need more like him, Bilbo's Bitch, Sabrina Wallace et al.
good piece. Now I got to scramble and see who is this Skeleton-laden, Mira Hindley.
The angelina vid looks edited a bit, but is not far from truth. See one of the user comments (2 or 3 down). Fritz - thanks for the reminder of the Spirit.
To you and Fritz, I couldn't find the Angelina Jolie when I was making my video on Hollywood & PedoSadist Cults (forgot to expand the comment). But I'll include it in the Substack version that will link to Rumble since YT has taken it down with a one-week moratorium on posting. So you know it's on to something! Here's the Rumble version: https://rumble.com/v3kigkz-hollywood-and-pedosadist-cults.html.
Thanx.
Yes the video of A is slightly edited but i saw the original and it is edited to explain... not to divert.
But that is what we have to do... explain... even when most people are ignorant to the Truth.
Russell Brand is most likely being targeted. There is a high possibility that those responsible are part of the Pilgrim Society, or at least the "Social Media Arm" of that franchise. They work to coordinate narratives of such things as "Safe and Effective" for vaccine pushes as one example. They have created the thing once known as the "Journ 'O' List," database for approved catch phrases; ever notice the catch phrases being used with surprising repetition? Things like: "Questioning the Election is very dangerous for our Democracy." These are the same people who coordinate Censorship with the "Misinformation" tag. Their efforts have been central in the "Cancel Culture." Here is a link to an article describing them:
https://aim4truth.org/2022/02/07/the-200-year-information-war-the-uk-u-s-pilgrims-society-controls-the-press/
Link to the main site to find more: https://aim4truth.org/?s=the+pilgrims+society
You could think of these as the Parasitic Elite's media outreach department, working closely with the main Parasites that operate out of the City of London, the outreach effort is directed at both the National Governments and the Private Corporate Chains of Custody. Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity own nearly all of the voting stock of all Legacy Media as well as Social Media Platforms. CEO's of those major Corporations must follow priorities mentioned to them by guys like Larry Fink. Russell is in their cross hairs because someone is getting too uncomfortable. I'm sure it is not Viscount Alfred Milner, maybe it could be one of his descendants.
As for Russell, I can say everyone deserves a chance to evolve past whatever created psychological havoc from bad experiences, who knows? He is possibly stronger for resetting his life and getting out of a bad circumstance. If there is something that I missed, I apologize in advance as I have not followed Russell too closely.
I learn so much from you, Nefahotep! The PE's PR (parasitic elite). It had to exist. I remember reading that the Republican party had very thick binders with established arguments and catch phrases for every point. The Democrats were like trying to herd cats with as many agendas as there were people in the room. But maybe those were two sides of the same psyops and the divisions in the left were as much planned narratives as the right.
I'll read your links with interest. Yes I agree that Russell is in the crosshairs because of something that's more personal to somebody than just the Covid narrative, even. I think the result of this is that he'll be left with no reason to guard his speech, because they've taken away all the bribes and used up all their threats (other than physical harm, and I don't think they'll go there for strategic, not moral, reasons.) And that will be good for all of us.
It's always pleasure, I'm learning a lot from you too.
The whole "Two Party System," was always kabuki theater. It's actually funny how obvious it is these days.
These Parasites got really greedy and moved too quickly starting about 3 years ago, they really can't hide anymore.
Thank you and agreed on the greed!
Always good to keep in mind The Tavistock Institute when looking at social engineering. John Coleman's book is a must-read:
"The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping The Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political And Economic Decline Of The United States Of America"
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/7863459
Thanks I'll check it out.
So much of this is hilarious. People need to get a life and stop imagining so many crazy ideas. If the system is trying to cancel him, then it might be time to start paying attention to him.
It's good to look at the many angles; turn it this way, then that, and yet another. Kaleidoscopic.
I see most people as in the process of becoming themselves, ongoing iterations. Often an unconscious process. The pace is both linked to the times (speeding up now) but also individuated. Russell hits me as someone who moves through these iterations quickly, (to some degree) consciously (with blindspots) and complicating things, publicly. I don't envy that.
He reflects many things for those who pay attention to him. We project so much on public figures we inevitably lose sight of 'them' in the process.
I've been many people (identities) in my life, though maintained some essential I-ness throughout, like everyone.
I would not enjoy the reconstruction of my life (impossible) narrated and projected onto screens by people (with agenda). What a f'ing drag. I know he put himself in the public sphere. I know he's enjoyed many benefits from that, but still, it looks like ritual sacrifice to me and it's sad.
I can not find it in myself to think RB is a 'bad' guy. Can't find it. And maybe that has absolutely nothing to do with him at all.
Even if it's true he was pulled into the operating 'cult' of entertainment, I have sympathy for those who want out. He's in service to everyone especially right now as his being targeted will bring much more into public awareness -including the existence of the illuminati or whatever other stupid name they call themselves.
Thanks Tereza.
What a nuanced reply, Kathleen. I think you read and 'liked' Guy's quote "The hero is the man actively engaged in becoming himself – never a very reassuring sight. The villain, on the other hand, has already become something." I myself am VERY happy to have not become famous in this or any previous iterations of my life. Very messy!
I might add to Guy's quote that villains are not fixed entities either. The closer I look at them, the more they shift shape.
Maintaining some 'essential-ness' is an interesting concept. I think that's why I've been curious to go back to iterations of Russell that I never paid attention to at the time. What I think appeals to Gina, my dance teacher, is an authenticity and playfulness in Russell's parody of himself. Gina's classes are a form of therapy where people bring their fully flawed selves because she's so ruthlessly honest about herself. And Russell always seems like he's trying to be honest with himself, whether that makes him popular or not.
Appreciate you.
Yes I did read Guy's comment. And I agree with your added thoughts too.
Re the essential bits - I remember reading Gurdjeff on this point. They are present in childhood and they are seen throughout one's life. He gave some kind of practice in identifying one's own. They are important in the context of our how we can best navigate our lives, using the gifts we arrived with. (And their underbelly).
I could certainly see playfulness, irreverence and a quick intelligence in Russell's. All of those qualities are strengths and all of them can become negatives too. With the entertainment industry he's playing in a very distorted, influential and ultimately dangerous playground! I imagine traps were laid long ago, well before he could grok the significance.
Sounds like a fun class! I'm a bit envious. Appreciate you back!!
Today's class had a dad outside the window dancing with a very little baby, maybe 5 mos. Gently of course! Pretty adorable.
I watched a video on bitchute I think.
It was about Hollywood Satanists.
It touched on KP and cannibalism.
It seemed far fetched and I was trying to fall asleep, but something about it shook me, made me wake up and watch it.
It gave me the chills, and now I can’t get it out of mind as a possibility.
She’s a disgusting roll model, and what every little girl and teen wants to be like.
I know what you mean. Since watching Anneke Lucas and reading Whitney Webb, I can't dismiss anything as impossible. The Deep Thought video suggested that Russell might be her handler but it could be the other way around. Maybe he was her 'assignment.' Keeping him roped in and performing in their subconscious triggering pageantry.
A friend was telling me that there are telltale seizures that people have from cannibalism and that some celebrities and politicians had shown the signs. I asked if that could be the vaxx but she said it was before that.
Oh well now that’s a new thought for my head. Cannibal Seizures? Lord help us
Was it called Out of Shadows? I just watched that because JimyChanga linked it since it was just banned from YT. With a stunt man narrating? I'm going to do a piece on it later today: https://www.outofshadows.org/.
I’m not sure if it had a name at all. I just stumbled on to it and tried to fall asleep listening. That definitely caught my attention though..
"My question in return is “What are we trusting him for? To think for us?” The answer to that is always no."
---------
Exactly. The same reason I was sticking up for Alex Jones -- not because I agree with what he says, but because I know that they were NEVER going to stop at him.
And your phrase in your article was excellent: "Comes at a time when he's re-Branded himself (lol) from a drugged out playboy to well-known attacker of government narratives."
I'm glad you're staying on the story too. From one of your links, I thought this was interesting: "This all comes after allegations surfaced, solicited by The Times, from women who claim Brand mistreated them in the past. Three of the women were anonymous, while one was an ex-girlfriend. The women stated that they had no plans to come forward with the allegations until they were contacted by The Times, and that it was in large part due to Brand's new success that they chose to speak out."
And women who had stories that didn't fit the narrative were left out of the story.......
yep that is exactly the video (third you mention) i sent you, but i got the longer version with more story's. like the disgusting thing he did in the bathroom when a young man in is debut he was. Funny how your statement assets or illuminati, is near mine said a few hours ago on your last post...puppets or puppeter. And now I would like here to debate some of these said subject:
1. about auditing for the one finaly finding her, the russel brand exposed video i never seen so thank you for that. heres my thought: twice in the interview when ask question he diverts it while pushing is body over the table towards larry king. Just weird and the question never answered. Also at 7min11 he ask if their is photo of the wedding. russel answer no and not sell.... here is the picture and the high cost price.
https://www.gettyimages.in/photos/katy-perry-russell-brand-and-wedding-guests-arrive-in-india
...and talk about a fail, after so many try out and dedication to find THE one it gets no better then 14 months and a happy family for that break up. i also find weird they married in india, where the rashi are's and the first MKultra sex gooroo addict mind controlled happened. what many with the obey sign obersved trought that video.
2. About the pied piper book, the story is not only he looks like it, he wrote the book he literaly incarnates the personality, in is show about disney child-catcher. they are the same as pan is the mythology of it. I understand actor dont choose the role, but writers do chose the words and structure of all their books no?
3. lastly, about sex and is thirst of it. I would compare russel brand to grigory raspoutine, more he feeds on woman or man, the more he developped is charm like some succubus (by the way they arent female they male turning to female turning back to male androgenous being supposedly) so from what i studied, kundalini is key in that. Its pretty occult masonic and bad seen, but i'd say their is two way for it. one is holding it in and dispersing your own energy trought your body tantric, and the other is awakening the serpent and what these pedosatanistcultist do. in wich way would russel brand be? Is russel brand having a sane sexuality and promoting sane sexuality to the young one? or do he amplifies the hippie fever like stars are use to? - point 3 is all personal opinion
i hope you will appreciate my comments as much as i appreciate your substack. Cause i do even if we have different point of view for now( either i'll convince you or you will convince me, we both seem flexible mind). Here is another link about vandana shiva its someone who went to school with her and if you dig far into indian culture you see she is for india what greta thunberg is to davos lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuMMRv5aivY
What I was glad to find in your initial comment was that you'd also listened to a lot of Russell's Luminary podcasts and shows from the last 5 years. I was happy to talk to someone (other than the many readers who initially found me through our common link to Russell) who was not stereotyping him based on the character he played over a decade ago.
Yet all of your examples from 1-3 are from that era. What did you find interesting enough about Russell that made you devote many hours to listening to him? Unlike me, Math wouldn't accuse you of being swayed by his sexual charisma. So what was it?
One of my questions in 'Have a Better Argument' is what does it matter? https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/how-to-have-a-better-argument
With Russell, when I finally came to the conclusion that he was captured or complicit, it mattered because his purpose was to control the opposition and lead us back into the slaughterhouse by a different route, as I explain for someone else on this: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malone-and-slaughterhouse-four
I stopped listening to him because of his associations with people like Tucker Carlson, Tulsi Gabbard, and others I saw as shilling for Trump. But now, that seems to be in vogue! So I guess we'll find out soon enough if these are all controlled opposition or true opposition.
My mentor John Michael Greer is a 33rd degree Mason. He has discussed that many times. He considers the current Mason order to be a lot like modern Christian churches where the magic of rituals has been gutted and are quite benign/boring now. Masonry now is mostly just a fraternal community of men who raise money to help the community, not unlike the Elks or even the VFW.
A subscriber of mine posted that video, I watched until that point and then turned it off, assuming the rest of it would be grossly exaggerated like that.
Very interesting and sinister. You've clearly done considerable homework Tereza. Can't fully grasp the magnitude of all this tbh...feels quite other worldly to me. Neither can I ponder it too much presently...such a heaviness, oppressiveness about the reach/power of it that leaves me deeply unsettled, saddened and perhaps a bit overwhelmed. Quite new to this learning. Thank you Tereza.
Haha, I don't know that heaviness, oppressiveness, deeply unsettled, saddened and overwhelmed is much of a gift to thank me for. :-) I will be doing more soon on solutions, I promise. I woke up this morning realizing that I'm ingesting a lot of poison in order to build up my immunity to it. A true inoculation. We all are. So take the other side seriously too--what I'm saying about spirituality and that we're being held safe within a purpose that's now coming into being. That purpose is benevolent. You're the right person in the right time at the right place with the right skills and you know what to do, as Charles Eisenstein says. Be kind and indulgent towards yourself wherever possible. Eat chocolate, take baths, do nothing a lot.
You're quite special and wise Tereza. God bless u + your work. X
Really appreciate that you went deeper on this. I still haven’t the opportunity to watch those Russel Brand videos that were suggested. I have to reconcile that I’m into the exploration of it all and it’s ok not to be completely sure of everything. The best we can do is to expand understanding around a topic from folks whose perspective resonates. I really like what you bring to the table. I enjoy how you envision solutions and how you connect dots across different genres. Thanks, Tereza!
I tried to an honest view presenting their points so you wouldn't need to watch them. From the responses of the people who'd recommended them, I think I did that. Thank you, Tonika!
Why are we looking for proof of illuminati membership by tattoos?
The higher ups would never think that an identifier is smart to have
No, these celebs are kind of naive and think it's cool to mimic the alpha people of society.
Same thing happened during Napoleon's rule, many children were deemed special for having his traits.
It's an outdated routine of humanity, to mimic the top of the tribe.
I think it could be more a sign of being 'owned' than being a member. That's why I'd distinguish between an asset and a member. For Russell, he says that it's the age at which Jesus died, and he also has a crucifix tattoo. But also the age that he thought he'd die. He says it always makes him happy to look at it now. I feel like Hollywood is all a death cult, worshiping fame. But I wonder now if Russell subconsciously sabotaged himself as a way out. I've seen people often do that with jobs. They can't quit but they can get themselves fired.
Sabotaged himself out of speaking his mind and getting popular?
No, the hit job was from the media. Guilty until proven innocent...
Not his fault. Even if he was a sexual prude all his life, they can pull this rape card.
I'm glad that he's done the honorable thing and explained his experience of the situations. It's about time someone stands up to hollow accusations.
I'm not saying he is innocent, but why is it ok to fire someone on an allegation?
This has become the norm, especially in social media destruction of people
I think today is the right time to set borders on justice.
Are we going to judge on pre crime or proof of post crime?
Oh I didn't mean now, I meant back during his Hollywood daze. It seems like he often said things that got him kicked off places. Maybe being a bad asset to the Illuminati. Until his resurgence in the 'pandemic' he was said to be all washed up.
Or he thought he was punk and wanted to be a bad boy.
It reminds me of how a lot of bad boys and deep thinkers of the punk/alternative scene ended up promoting the convid and shots.
If anything, they're the ones perpetuating the illuminati plan!
At least Russell still is punk at heart, not needing to be violent or brash, but by calling out the bullies using plain language!
It's really funny to see how they reacted to him this cheap way.
They're desperate! They need the quick fix of ratings and power to restrict.
If the enemy of my many enemies is my friend, then surely Russell Brand is my friend. I don't agree with everything he says, but by and large he's on the money. It's a war of the The Elites vs. all the rest of us, and as long as they keep us squabbling among ourselves they keep laughing (at us) all the way to the bank. Propaganda and distractions is all they have.
I think the reason it’s ok to cancel someone over an allegation, is they are prepping everyone who dared to wrong think. Letting us all know what will happen if we speak up
Can we trust Russel Brand? Come on!!!!
No, the question should be: Do I care one iota about Russel Brand?
The fact that he's married to Catie Perry says it all.
That's all I need to know.
He's is in the big club that I ain't in.
Not sure if you read my article. He was married to Katy Perry for 14 mos. and filed for divorce NYE 2011, letting her know by text. If he was in 'the big club,' he left it in a way that allowed no going back. All of these allegations were solicited by the media 10-20 yrs after they supposedly happened. If he wasn't making someone very uncomfortable now, as Nefahotep says, he wouldn't be in the crosshairs. And who's coming after him? I suspect it's the same people you name as the powers-that-shouldn't-be. So you should care.
I read it, but I missed tha part where they were divorced. Yeah, I guess if he has a target on his back now he can't be all bad.
Here is a quote from Arnulf Øverland, and I wouldn't be surprised if you are familiar with it already considering the subject matter:
Du må ikke tåle så inderlig vel
den urett som ikke rammer dig selv!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dare_not_to_sleep
Haha, thanks for that--"if he has a target on his back now he can't be all bad."
I didn't know this poem but, as you know, I'm questioning a lot about the WWII narrative. Is it truth or more propaganda? Who knows?
I recently saw a video that explained very simply that everything we learned about WWII is a lie. It was almost as big a psy-op as Covid-19. It may even have been you.
Outside of math related material, almost everything we were taught and the great bulk of what we hear is a myth to one degree or another. Furthermore, the depth and breadth of the bollocks out there is as pervasive, astonishing and fascinating as it is enduring, and as far as I can tell it's always been that way.
Tereza, just for you!
The Brand brouhaha solved by Mathis. Some examples.:
Given who is running the world, your best guess should always be that the mainstream story is false and that the hidden truth points right at the usual suspects.
History is little more than a litany of skullduggery, always perpetrated by the same black-hearted families. With only a little digging, we have found them hunkered below every atrocity ever recorded. With only a few exceptions, we can now spot them from just a name and a nose. As Princess Leia said, we can smell their foul stench from a mile away. It hangs in the air and no wind will blow it away.
This is all another managed event, of course, since Brand is of the families. Yes, he has been on the right side of some issues recently, but that is all controlled opposition.
Again, it proves what you are told by the mainstream media is garbage, on all topics. It is beyond clownworld…
You will say my views are also guided in the same way, but that is doubtful since I don't believe anything I see online. I don't even look at mainstream coverage of anything, and most of the alternative coverage doesn't impress me, either.
http://mileswmathis.com/hanlon.pdf
Hi, Goeff. I'll look at this again but I did examine it when you posted it before. There's some of the Mathis genealogy that I think is spot on but I thought this one was far-fetched. There's been no one coming forward with a story that Russell was secretly wealthy rather than dirt poor with an abusive stepdad. But maybe I'm wrong. I'll look at it again.
T, I don't think I posted this one previously since he just published it and there are some other points that though not related, are nevertheless interesing vis a vis our general predicament.
Oh sorry Geoff, it was the genealogy of Russell that he links in here you sent before. I reread that one too. There are credible things in it. Yet they still come down to guilt-by-association or guilt-by-genealogy. It would be quite the cover for a gay man to be 'Shagger of the Year' and married twice, with a third baby on the way. That seems like an awful lot of first-hand witnesses to keep quiet. I've seen him flirt with men more than women on his podcasts but in such an over-the-top way that I see them being 'safe' for a reformed shagger. On zoom calls he's been effusively complimentary to bizarre looking old guys along with saying I looked 'magnificent.' It didn't go to my head (too much) because it's just who he is.
Miles, who's very funny, btw, sees the end game as boosting Russell's viewers because he thinks the numbers are made-up. I'm not sure whether that's from a low opinion of Russell or the rest of us--probably both. I found him the ONLY person worth listening to during the CovidCon, and I don't think anyone would call me naive.
And the end-game is to get us to censor ourselves believing that we can be taken down without trial or evidence. Is Miles that naive? Do I think there's anywhere I can appeal YT taking down my last video or if they choose to remove my channel? Really Miles? I do think it's possible he's right about Russell being part of the peerage and the poor background has been fabricated. And I definitely think he's right about Fairley and Russell being instruments of the cult. But I still think this is retaliation for trying to get out. But I'm keeping an open mind.
No problem. Most of this stuff I'll never know the answer to if there is one (or more). As for Mathis, he certainly seems to be a mixed bag but some of his stuff seems interesting, but in the end , who knows?
I hope I didn't waste your time!
Not at all! Miles is definitely doing research that's important to know. And it's happened before that I've rejected something only to view the subject again and say, "OMG, how did I miss that?" So I'm not dismissing it.
I wonder how far this story goes. John St Julien has a frightening hypothesis with this "Russell Brand - Establishment Wolf In Sheep's Clothing Or Man Of The People" After listening/watching this most narratives are faliing apart and I am left in limbo.
https://youtu.be/SUrM0pJXEac?t=203
Thanks for linking, Marc. I'll check it out.