"Sometimes I’m accused of questioning Israel’s right to exist. This is completely false. I don’t believe Israel does exist." I see you decided to wade in slowly. 😂
Thank you for fleshing out, what's been left out of our history.
"Anti-semite" has been such a remarkable word spell. Surely a precursor to 'safe and effective' in its power to challenge questions and thought.
The merging of 'faith' with 'religion' had a similar effect and kept many from challenging religions out of an innate respect for faith. That spell is breaking too. I wrote about it in my most recent stack. (I don't usually link my own, but since I think they dovetail:
Haha, I'm always happy to have my delicate approach be appreciated by you ;-)
Wasn't that fascinating to find out that the Anti-Semite League was founded by someone with three Jewish ex-wives who was concerned about their monopoly on finance and industry?
The question of who the Semites are came up on my YT comments so I went back to my source in the NIV Study Bible. The story of Noah's sons Genesis 10:21 is titled The Semites and the footnote reads, "The descendants of Shem were called Shemites, later modified to Semites."
It's interesting that The Tower of Babel is interjected after that and before the nine generations that get to Abram. Obviously they needed to explain why, if the whole world had descended from Noah who gave it to the Shemites, everyone spoke a different language. It's actually a very ham-handed reverse justification.
And PLEASE link your own. I'm behind in my reading and had missed this. I've made your picture my wallpaper, as I often do. And I've linked your article in a draft called A House for the Soul in the Land Beyond Faith, which is the title of a book I'd been working on. I think we define these words differently and I'm eager to explore the ideas you present. I won't say more now so I can save that eagerness for the episode.
"Obviously they needed to explain why, if the whole world had descended from Noah who gave it to the Shemites, everyone spoke a different language. It's actually a very ham-handed reverse justification."
'Ham-handed reverse justifications' are just another tool (along / partial truths, lying outright, projecting and accusing enemies of your crimes, conflating, disproportionating etc.) - in the Deception toolbox, right?
I took a bunch of Religion Studies classes in another life, though remember little of the details. I could never really figure out how so many saw the bible as THE source of their faith. It was pretty clear that interpretation - and differences with - were wide. Yet, so persistently compelling.
Now we have The Naked Bible (interpreted from ancient Hebrew) making the case the The Old Testament is not about God at all - but perhaps an account of a 'superior' non-human beings who genetically manufactured homo sapiens, and also we've had, since the 90's I think, the Bible Code scholars, (and mathematicians) who tell us the Torah is a dynamic code that includes everything that has has happened in the past and our future. (Gregg Braden sees its coded nature as suggestive that we do live in some kind of simulation. I'd really like to see Braden and Biglino talk.)
What to make of all this? At the very least, it's all up for a major re-think. I suspect the translations - so varied - are attempts at controlling a very large contextual narrative for controlling us. Of course, we'd inevitably get here.
I look forward to more on A House for the Soul in the Land Beyond Faith (great title) and exploring our differences on how we define faith. (Fluid for me.)
Hey TC, nice job on Churchill's atrocites. Fits well with your article on Kissinger.
Well summarized, too.
"So there you have it. The deaths of millions, the leveling of cities, and a permanent legacy that “all’s fair in love and war” because of the stock market gambling debts and debauchery of a chronic drunk on one side and a philandering propagandist on the other. And I didn’t even mention that Churchill bombed the disarmed French fleet and killed 2000 of his own allies because he mistranslated a French word.
These are what passes for heroes these days; God help us."
Henry Makow has a lot of interesting info about a lot of things, including Church-ill.:
"The real point is that history is a hoax, contrived by cabalist central bankers, to advance world tyranny. They empower perverts and misfits to create war and mayhem. For example, chaos relieved Winston Churchill's chronic depression. He confessed at the onset of WWI: "Everything is tending to catastrophe and collapse. I am interested, geared up, and happy. Is it not horrible to be built like this?"
These monsters are our leaders. Subverted by a Luciferian cult, the moral bankruptcy of Western society is masked by material prosperity but this cannot last. Thus, they are erecting a police state while the intelligentsia and masses can still be bought with their own credit. "
Thank you, Geoff. I had the funny experience of reading the first quote and thinking, "That's well said and ballsy" before I realized it was mine ;-)
Great Henry Makow quote. I especially liked "they are erecting a police state while the intelligentsia and masses can still be bought with their own credit." I have his article on the Dreyfus Affair as a false flag in a draft, referred by someone else, for a future article. He's brilliant and I'll read this with interest.
Thank you, Pasheen, for the impetus to include Kissinger in this post and tie the two together. It was your great memes I needed to include and even if the eugenics one was a spoof, it was so well done that it deserves spreading! Always appreciate you.
I don't care if it's true or not...that would have been the least of his horrors...and you can't fact check anything now...so, I say we make up anything we want to and put it out there...Fighting lies with lies? Come and get me...?
Yes I thought about giving permission to dock my pay ;-) And the quote about military men was listed as 'almost certainly not true.' So I put in the word 'reportedly' but that's what passes for an authoritative denial these days? Sheesh!
Ha ha! "Ballzy" sounds like something describing toxic masculinity, but somehow "ovaryzy" sounds more like some sort of fried eggs, so I guess that wouldn't work for toxic femininity. Blaaah!! Anyway, it is a great quote which is one reason I homed in on it.
I do hope you check out some of Makow's short articles on Churchill; gawd was he a sleazeball. A nothing striving to be somebody without a shred of decency. Just like Kissinger in so many ways. Have been reading some of your WW2 stuff and must say that you really do a thorogh job of your topics and I certainl appreciate it.
Dec 2, 2023·edited Dec 2, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Wonderful, Tereza.
“In New York on September 26, 1918 Louis Marshall wrote to the anti-Zionist Max Senior, "My reasons for supporting Zionism have been emphasised by the rapid march of events. The Allied armies have now swept the Turks and Germans out of Palestine. It is significant that Jewish units constitute a part of the victorious army. President Wilson has expressed his approval of the principles laid down in the Balfour Declaration, and the Allied Powers are unanimously in favour of it. The American Jewish Committee recognised the political importance of the Balfour Declaration as a factor in the efforts to defeat the Central Powers. Major Lionel de Rothschild states that the League for British Jews of which he is president, is in agreement with the American Jewish Committee.
The Balfour Declaration with its acceptance by the Powers is an act of the highest diplomacy. It means BOTH MORE AND LESS than appears on the surface; FOR ZIONISM IS BUT AN INCIDENT OF .A FAR REACHING PLAN: IT IS MERELY A CONVENIENT PEG ON WHICH TO HANG A POWERFUL WEAPON."
[emphasis as appears in printed book]
• “The Eighth Crusade: Uncensored Disclosure of a British Staff Officer 1939” – Attributed to Lt.-Col. E. B. Waters-Taylor.
You never cease to amaze me, Julius. Was it you or someone else who pointed out to me that Freedman was the seminal source of the Balfour info I'd picked up from Max Igan? I may have replied with something snippy at the time, along the lines of "I can't read everything, that's why I count on you." But I've now read that Freedman speech multiple times and get more out of it with each. (ps I'm still leaving the online books to you!)
I am aware of Freedman and have listened in the past but have not focused on him. Someone else deserves that credit.
Keep up the great work - you create an anchor for those of us who just have incidental thoughts without being able articulate a full article. I am still plodding along with the Maria diary
I'm with you. I was so excited when I figured out the reading list sidebar on my browser. I quickly filled it up and now I'm afraid to even open it again. I'll check out the appetizer!
Amazing. Thought provoking. Thank you. Many of your conclusions are similar to my own forbidden thoughts about the chaos in that territory of the Middle East. It makes me feel a whole lot less crazy when you lay everything out in such an organized way.
Stunning post! I think most of us who know about the whole "creation of Israel" on Palestinian land tend to be quiet so we don't get labeled with the anti Semitism label. I'm not pro Hamas at all, but not pro Zionism either. Tricky to be Switzerland in this conflict. Great job! ❤️👏💥
Thank you so much, Heather! I believe in the right of armed self defense and yet I think Hamas is an agent of Israel. The timing with the Yom Kippur War, the last minute change of the location of the rave, the intentional ignoring of the border crossing. I think this is being planned as the cleansing of Israel to fulfill a Biblical narrative ... and scoop the oil reserves. I'm sure I read that somewhere in the prophecies!
Some interesting comments on Kissinger and a few others in this 60 second read from Makow.
" 'The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy', The New York Times on Saturday quotes Kissinger as saying on the tapes. 'And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern'."
"Kissinger: Gassing Jews would not be a U.S. problem"
Henry Kissinger was a "Soviet" Agent by Henry Makow
Still have not found the source of the Makow quotes I question. One was his supposed comment about the military being dumb, stupid animals. I can't imagine him saying it although he likely felt that way.
Great article, Tereza. Here's one that complements yours and demonstrates how the 2023 bombardment of Gaza is linked to the 1948 ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.
Thanks for sending me to your post, Josh. Very courageous of you to face this as someone raised in Hebrew school. Others, like Naomi Wolf, simply accept their role as God's chosen people. You not only take a hard look at Israel's action today but also the creation of Israel. And you critique the scriptural ideology that endorses it, adding new information to my knowledge.
As you probably know, I've been delving into the Shemite scriptures, the genealogy of who has the God-given right to rule the world, from Noah's son Shem to Jacob/ Israel to Abram to the Davidic dynasty. That's interesting that the Amalekites are descendants of Esau. That makes sense, if we look at the Bible as a projection of guilt.
But I don't disagree with your heart or your conclusions, and I commend you. I'll also post this on your essay, post it in a note, and link it in a future draft. Thanks Josh!
"Unz feels that he is not entirely credible because of unspecified historical errors ..."
Well, Unz is wrong there, as he often is, because there probably are no historical errors in Freedman's speech although there definitely are in at least one commonly avalabe transcription and I refuted a listing of those in a comment on UR years ago showing how a transcriber may easily make the listed "errors." wonder if it's still accessible.
I would definitely like to hear a verifiably true audio of Freedman so I could make my own transcript.
Anyway, Unz is definitely a mixed bag. And I've learned to be wary of those who may speak the truth only in order to gain "street cred." This goes double for $h__ stirrers and triple for those with big bucks.
I have no doubt that Freedman, despite any honest or forged "errors," was speaking the truth and if anyone wants to know why, it's because his message fits a very common pattern, and it's a pattern that's rarely allowed to see the light of day.
Thanks for those additions, Geoff. I didn't pick up on any historical errors either, but I don't know the history as well as you. I think that he had an emphasis on white Christianity that I didn't share, if I'm remembering the right speech. But that certainly didn't change his credibility, which seemed very high to me based on the money he'd lost getting the information out. That's always a good indicator to me.
It was very interesting to me that when the discussion about Freedman's speech came up, if I remmeber correctly, some "thentofore" unkown commenter popped up and started "talkin trash" about it. I had to laugh and I shot down every single point it made and it was never heard from again. No one refuted me and while I had a lot of supporters there, I also had plenty of vicious enemies, some of whom were so persistent that they had to be bots. It was great fun for several years til something happened and a purge began. It was about the time that Linh Dinh left in a huff and who still seems bitter to this day.
Part of the fun was interacting with guys like Ralph Raico (RIP) who rarely showed up but when he did, he'd support my comments. Then there was the time that (I'll just used the initials) PG, a really doofus but somehwat prominent, writer for the "Libertarian" LRC came on and started yapping about his "friend" Murray Rothbard and tried to set some commenter straight by invoking Rothbard's name, which was utterly bogus and I counter commented with a quote of Rothbard's which pretty obviously contradicted the dude, and that shut him up permanently which was not my intent because I prefer that they stick around and make fools of themselves. They invariably show themselves as vacuous windbags, and that so called and self proclaimed "experts" are mostly full of fetid and overheated air who can, and should be, effectively challenged.
I got censored on one of my comments which was perfectly civil but also had the potential to be quite embarrasing to the goons running the show, so I left too. Like I said it was a blast because some of the commenters were quite vicious but I was up to the challenge if I may ever so humbly say so myself. It was quite stimulating but also a huge waste of time due to the high percentage of name calling clowns and their laughable simple mindedness and worse. A lot of them used to "lose it" which was hilarious.
One really useful tool over there is Unz's archives of old magazines, which are a real treasure. I used to spend days at that site and uncovered tons of gems.
I like your military strategy and share it! Give me a contentious fool any day to be a foil for my arguments! Unz, like Taibbi and Greenwald, attracts a lot of the guys (in particular) showing off, so I can see where that would be both a blast and a huge waste of time. Thanks for taking one for the truth-telling team!
"...lot of the guys (in particular) showing off..."
Now that you mention it, there were a few women, most of whom were excellent, but the place was definitely overrun with ignorant mouthy males doin the strut. It was fun knocking them back into their places, but they always came back. Must've been gluttons for punishment.
Thank you, Tereza! You did a great job on this, assembling key pieces of the puzzle and presenting them in a very understandable way. When more good people see this information, they will understand why our parasite overclass has made discussion of such awareness taboo.
Interesting how Zionists' outrageous behavior has so rapidly undermined the power of the "Jew Taboo". A key weapon is going limp. Will our good (or even just smart) Jewish friends withdraw support from the central banking families in time? Have you seen this brilliant analysis from Neo Liberal Feudalism? :
That's an astute observation, Jerome. I agree with you, the blatancy of this genocidal assault has broken the dam that made any criticism of Jews forbidden. If that's true is the US, imagine the response in the rest of the world. I'll read your article with interest, thanks for your attention to this episode and all the comments on it.
Thank you, dear Tereza! Another genius piece by you!
Thank you for providing all these details, information. Truth is coming out thanks to people like you.
Like Cliff High is saying - humans will be analyzing, questioning 6,000 years of our existence! It is a lot of questioning to do. :) :) :) . even in the past 100 years... of all the lies we have been told.. but there comes a day we cannot tolerate the lies any longer!
I just finished the stack on geoengineering... oh, boy! Cannot look at this horror at the Sky!
Thanks for reading and your kind comment, Masha. I agree that the lies are coming out in a way that seems unprecedented.
Thanks for the link to your post! Yes, the geoengineering is hard. I'm trying to train myself to see the formations as beautiful, since I can't do anything about them, just so I don't get depressed every time I look up. I have these episodes on it:
Thank you Teresa for your thoughts and research. I am left wondering, however, what the US had to gain from entering the Great War? What leverage did the Zionists have at the time? It wasn’t because we had altruistic ideas for a safe homeland for the Jews. Knowing about the killing of the Jews in WWII didn’t get us involved then either.
Hi, Camila. The Unz article https://www.unz.com/runz/the-balfour-declaration-and-116000-american-lives/ makes the case that the Zionists did NOT convince Wilson to enter the war but, as he says, "sold the British the Brooklyn Bridge" by claiming that they did. But I don't know if Unz is looking at it as US vs. Germany instead of Bankers Uber Alles, as I would.
He gives the example of US Jews still having relatives in Germany, like "Paul Warburg had helped establish the Federal Reserve, while his brother Max Warburg had remained back home and become a leading banker and important wartime official in his native Germany."
I see that as a one-two punch. The Fed was set up with Rockefeller (who Kissinger worked for until Nixon won, then switched) and Morgan, who was Rothschild's man. That was 1913.
If Germany had offered peace without reparations, the banker who insisted that the Kaiser fund the war 100% with loans would never have been paid. I suspect that was Rothschilds. So he controlled both sides of the war. In the US, he could generate millions of free Fed dollars to fund WWI, as Ron Paul documents they did, or he could collapse the banks and overturn the economy. That, I think was the #1 instigation. But Unz gives plenty of other motivations, none of which came from the Zionists.
"Sometimes I’m accused of questioning Israel’s right to exist. This is completely false. I don’t believe Israel does exist." I see you decided to wade in slowly. 😂
Thank you for fleshing out, what's been left out of our history.
"Anti-semite" has been such a remarkable word spell. Surely a precursor to 'safe and effective' in its power to challenge questions and thought.
The merging of 'faith' with 'religion' had a similar effect and kept many from challenging religions out of an innate respect for faith. That spell is breaking too. I wrote about it in my most recent stack. (I don't usually link my own, but since I think they dovetail:
https://devanneykathleen.substack.com/p/faith-and-religion
Thanks, Tereza. Brilliant.
Haha, I'm always happy to have my delicate approach be appreciated by you ;-)
Wasn't that fascinating to find out that the Anti-Semite League was founded by someone with three Jewish ex-wives who was concerned about their monopoly on finance and industry?
The question of who the Semites are came up on my YT comments so I went back to my source in the NIV Study Bible. The story of Noah's sons Genesis 10:21 is titled The Semites and the footnote reads, "The descendants of Shem were called Shemites, later modified to Semites."
It's interesting that The Tower of Babel is interjected after that and before the nine generations that get to Abram. Obviously they needed to explain why, if the whole world had descended from Noah who gave it to the Shemites, everyone spoke a different language. It's actually a very ham-handed reverse justification.
And PLEASE link your own. I'm behind in my reading and had missed this. I've made your picture my wallpaper, as I often do. And I've linked your article in a draft called A House for the Soul in the Land Beyond Faith, which is the title of a book I'd been working on. I think we define these words differently and I'm eager to explore the ideas you present. I won't say more now so I can save that eagerness for the episode.
"Obviously they needed to explain why, if the whole world had descended from Noah who gave it to the Shemites, everyone spoke a different language. It's actually a very ham-handed reverse justification."
'Ham-handed reverse justifications' are just another tool (along / partial truths, lying outright, projecting and accusing enemies of your crimes, conflating, disproportionating etc.) - in the Deception toolbox, right?
I took a bunch of Religion Studies classes in another life, though remember little of the details. I could never really figure out how so many saw the bible as THE source of their faith. It was pretty clear that interpretation - and differences with - were wide. Yet, so persistently compelling.
Now we have The Naked Bible (interpreted from ancient Hebrew) making the case the The Old Testament is not about God at all - but perhaps an account of a 'superior' non-human beings who genetically manufactured homo sapiens, and also we've had, since the 90's I think, the Bible Code scholars, (and mathematicians) who tell us the Torah is a dynamic code that includes everything that has has happened in the past and our future. (Gregg Braden sees its coded nature as suggestive that we do live in some kind of simulation. I'd really like to see Braden and Biglino talk.)
What to make of all this? At the very least, it's all up for a major re-think. I suspect the translations - so varied - are attempts at controlling a very large contextual narrative for controlling us. Of course, we'd inevitably get here.
I look forward to more on A House for the Soul in the Land Beyond Faith (great title) and exploring our differences on how we define faith. (Fluid for me.)
Best, Tereza.
Thanks for those provocative thoughts (in the best sense of provoking more thoughts!)
You're the second person to mention The Naked Bible to me. I'll cogitate on this for my next article!
"The merging of 'faith' with 'religion' had a similar effect and kept many from challenging religions out of an innate respect for faith. "
In addition to "innate," may I suggest we add, "inane" "indecent" "inculcated" "ingrained" "infantile" and "indecent" to the list? : )
Hey TC, nice job on Churchill's atrocites. Fits well with your article on Kissinger.
Well summarized, too.
"So there you have it. The deaths of millions, the leveling of cities, and a permanent legacy that “all’s fair in love and war” because of the stock market gambling debts and debauchery of a chronic drunk on one side and a philandering propagandist on the other. And I didn’t even mention that Churchill bombed the disarmed French fleet and killed 2000 of his own allies because he mistranslated a French word.
These are what passes for heroes these days; God help us."
Henry Makow has a lot of interesting info about a lot of things, including Church-ill.:
"The real point is that history is a hoax, contrived by cabalist central bankers, to advance world tyranny. They empower perverts and misfits to create war and mayhem. For example, chaos relieved Winston Churchill's chronic depression. He confessed at the onset of WWI: "Everything is tending to catastrophe and collapse. I am interested, geared up, and happy. Is it not horrible to be built like this?"
These monsters are our leaders. Subverted by a Luciferian cult, the moral bankruptcy of Western society is masked by material prosperity but this cannot last. Thus, they are erecting a police state while the intelligentsia and masses can still be bought with their own credit. "
http://www.whale.to/b/makow145.html
Thank you, Geoff. I had the funny experience of reading the first quote and thinking, "That's well said and ballsy" before I realized it was mine ;-)
Great Henry Makow quote. I especially liked "they are erecting a police state while the intelligentsia and masses can still be bought with their own credit." I have his article on the Dreyfus Affair as a false flag in a draft, referred by someone else, for a future article. He's brilliant and I'll read this with interest.
Let ME say it for you...well said, Tereza, and very ballzy!!!
Thank you, Pasheen, for the impetus to include Kissinger in this post and tie the two together. It was your great memes I needed to include and even if the eugenics one was a spoof, it was so well done that it deserves spreading! Always appreciate you.
I don't care if it's true or not...that would have been the least of his horrors...and you can't fact check anything now...so, I say we make up anything we want to and put it out there...Fighting lies with lies? Come and get me...?
Yes I thought about giving permission to dock my pay ;-) And the quote about military men was listed as 'almost certainly not true.' So I put in the word 'reportedly' but that's what passes for an authoritative denial these days? Sheesh!
LOL....dock my pay ;-)
Ha ha! "Ballzy" sounds like something describing toxic masculinity, but somehow "ovaryzy" sounds more like some sort of fried eggs, so I guess that wouldn't work for toxic femininity. Blaaah!! Anyway, it is a great quote which is one reason I homed in on it.
I do hope you check out some of Makow's short articles on Churchill; gawd was he a sleazeball. A nothing striving to be somebody without a shred of decency. Just like Kissinger in so many ways. Have been reading some of your WW2 stuff and must say that you really do a thorogh job of your topics and I certainl appreciate it.
Great analysis, Tereza. Thank you. The Kol Nidre would be grotesque even as an oath; but, as a prayer it is just so far beyond The Pale.
It's rather revealing of their regard for us and our (once) high trust way of relating to one another.
Wonderful, Tereza.
“In New York on September 26, 1918 Louis Marshall wrote to the anti-Zionist Max Senior, "My reasons for supporting Zionism have been emphasised by the rapid march of events. The Allied armies have now swept the Turks and Germans out of Palestine. It is significant that Jewish units constitute a part of the victorious army. President Wilson has expressed his approval of the principles laid down in the Balfour Declaration, and the Allied Powers are unanimously in favour of it. The American Jewish Committee recognised the political importance of the Balfour Declaration as a factor in the efforts to defeat the Central Powers. Major Lionel de Rothschild states that the League for British Jews of which he is president, is in agreement with the American Jewish Committee.
The Balfour Declaration with its acceptance by the Powers is an act of the highest diplomacy. It means BOTH MORE AND LESS than appears on the surface; FOR ZIONISM IS BUT AN INCIDENT OF .A FAR REACHING PLAN: IT IS MERELY A CONVENIENT PEG ON WHICH TO HANG A POWERFUL WEAPON."
[emphasis as appears in printed book]
• “The Eighth Crusade: Uncensored Disclosure of a British Staff Officer 1939” – Attributed to Lt.-Col. E. B. Waters-Taylor.
A PDF copy can be found here:
https://archive.org/details/the_eighth_crusade/page/n3/mode/2up
You never cease to amaze me, Julius. Was it you or someone else who pointed out to me that Freedman was the seminal source of the Balfour info I'd picked up from Max Igan? I may have replied with something snippy at the time, along the lines of "I can't read everything, that's why I count on you." But I've now read that Freedman speech multiple times and get more out of it with each. (ps I'm still leaving the online books to you!)
I am aware of Freedman and have listened in the past but have not focused on him. Someone else deserves that credit.
Keep up the great work - you create an anchor for those of us who just have incidental thoughts without being able articulate a full article. I am still plodding along with the Maria diary
Thank you Julius. I still have your Rolo Slavsky recommendation open in my tabs. What is the Maria diary?
This is intended for my next Book Mention
• “Maria Romanov: Third Daughter of The Last Tsar: “Diaries and Letters 1908 - 1918”
– Helen Azar
Here is an appetiser
• Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna Romanova, 1914, Brought To Life - History Scoop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuyITiZMLog
I have so many tabs open it is bewildering. Just have to shut them down now and then, clear the mind and learn new stuff tomorrow.
I'm with you. I was so excited when I figured out the reading list sidebar on my browser. I quickly filled it up and now I'm afraid to even open it again. I'll check out the appetizer!
Amazing. Thought provoking. Thank you. Many of your conclusions are similar to my own forbidden thoughts about the chaos in that territory of the Middle East. It makes me feel a whole lot less crazy when you lay everything out in such an organized way.
How do you do it?
Lindsey Graham when asked about massive Palestinian civilian casualties during a CNN interview:
💬 "Did the American people worry about how many people died when we destroyed Tokyo and Berlin?"
Wow. What massive arrogance. Thanks for reading this!
The banality of evil indeed.
Stunning post! I think most of us who know about the whole "creation of Israel" on Palestinian land tend to be quiet so we don't get labeled with the anti Semitism label. I'm not pro Hamas at all, but not pro Zionism either. Tricky to be Switzerland in this conflict. Great job! ❤️👏💥
Thank you so much, Heather! I believe in the right of armed self defense and yet I think Hamas is an agent of Israel. The timing with the Yom Kippur War, the last minute change of the location of the rave, the intentional ignoring of the border crossing. I think this is being planned as the cleansing of Israel to fulfill a Biblical narrative ... and scoop the oil reserves. I'm sure I read that somewhere in the prophecies!
Some interesting comments on Kissinger and a few others in this 60 second read from Makow.
" 'The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy', The New York Times on Saturday quotes Kissinger as saying on the tapes. 'And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern'."
"Kissinger: Gassing Jews would not be a U.S. problem"
Henry Kissinger was a "Soviet" Agent by Henry Makow
https://henrymakow.com/kissinger.html
Very interesting. Is this the quote you say calls Makow's credibility into question or another?
So that's why Kissinger could go right from Rockefeller to Nixon when he won--they were both on the same side, Rockefeller's.
Arrrrggghhh!
As usual, I got sidetracked...and found a ton of interesting stuff here.:
https://silview.media/2020/11/03/1st-anniversary-special-soros-a-rothschild-frontman-forged-imf-china-alliance-were-living-the-consequences/
Still have not found the source of the Makow quotes I question. One was his supposed comment about the military being dumb, stupid animals. I can't imagine him saying it although he likely felt that way.
That one has the perfume of legitimacy to me, although who can be sure?
Here's one that I was referring to. I also found several more that I question. Will look to see if I can refind them.
I have decades ago learned to question everything and the covid experience has firmly solidified that position.
A friend sent this article, that adds more to the 'what wouldn't he say' quotes: https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/12/01/the-dr-caligari-of-american-empire/
If the NY Times would report him saying that, what wouldn't he say?
"I love everybody, especially goyim!" ? : )
PS: I'm not defending the scum. Not by a long shot. I hope he lived long enough to feel like the doggie doo that he (it) was...!
Great article, Tereza. Here's one that complements yours and demonstrates how the 2023 bombardment of Gaza is linked to the 1948 ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.
https://open.substack.com/pub/generalgrievance/p/jewish-supremacy-from-the-river-to?r=z5j1k&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Thanks for sending me to your post, Josh. Very courageous of you to face this as someone raised in Hebrew school. Others, like Naomi Wolf, simply accept their role as God's chosen people. You not only take a hard look at Israel's action today but also the creation of Israel. And you critique the scriptural ideology that endorses it, adding new information to my knowledge.
As you probably know, I've been delving into the Shemite scriptures, the genealogy of who has the God-given right to rule the world, from Noah's son Shem to Jacob/ Israel to Abram to the Davidic dynasty. That's interesting that the Amalekites are descendants of Esau. That makes sense, if we look at the Bible as a projection of guilt.
I see the World Wars and the Bible following the same formula of turning history inside-out and upside-down, making the villains into heroes, the heroes into villains, the victims into aggressors, and the aggressors into victims. So I differ with you on taking the victim narratives of both as a given, as I show in these: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/talmud-tricks-and-torah-curses (talks about Jacob), https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/empire-and-religion and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/hot-and-cold-hatred.
But I don't disagree with your heart or your conclusions, and I commend you. I'll also post this on your essay, post it in a note, and link it in a future draft. Thanks Josh!
"Unz feels that he is not entirely credible because of unspecified historical errors ..."
Well, Unz is wrong there, as he often is, because there probably are no historical errors in Freedman's speech although there definitely are in at least one commonly avalabe transcription and I refuted a listing of those in a comment on UR years ago showing how a transcriber may easily make the listed "errors." wonder if it's still accessible.
I would definitely like to hear a verifiably true audio of Freedman so I could make my own transcript.
Anyway, Unz is definitely a mixed bag. And I've learned to be wary of those who may speak the truth only in order to gain "street cred." This goes double for $h__ stirrers and triple for those with big bucks.
I have no doubt that Freedman, despite any honest or forged "errors," was speaking the truth and if anyone wants to know why, it's because his message fits a very common pattern, and it's a pattern that's rarely allowed to see the light of day.
Thanks for helping turn on the lights!
Thanks for those additions, Geoff. I didn't pick up on any historical errors either, but I don't know the history as well as you. I think that he had an emphasis on white Christianity that I didn't share, if I'm remembering the right speech. But that certainly didn't change his credibility, which seemed very high to me based on the money he'd lost getting the information out. That's always a good indicator to me.
It was very interesting to me that when the discussion about Freedman's speech came up, if I remmeber correctly, some "thentofore" unkown commenter popped up and started "talkin trash" about it. I had to laugh and I shot down every single point it made and it was never heard from again. No one refuted me and while I had a lot of supporters there, I also had plenty of vicious enemies, some of whom were so persistent that they had to be bots. It was great fun for several years til something happened and a purge began. It was about the time that Linh Dinh left in a huff and who still seems bitter to this day.
Part of the fun was interacting with guys like Ralph Raico (RIP) who rarely showed up but when he did, he'd support my comments. Then there was the time that (I'll just used the initials) PG, a really doofus but somehwat prominent, writer for the "Libertarian" LRC came on and started yapping about his "friend" Murray Rothbard and tried to set some commenter straight by invoking Rothbard's name, which was utterly bogus and I counter commented with a quote of Rothbard's which pretty obviously contradicted the dude, and that shut him up permanently which was not my intent because I prefer that they stick around and make fools of themselves. They invariably show themselves as vacuous windbags, and that so called and self proclaimed "experts" are mostly full of fetid and overheated air who can, and should be, effectively challenged.
I got censored on one of my comments which was perfectly civil but also had the potential to be quite embarrasing to the goons running the show, so I left too. Like I said it was a blast because some of the commenters were quite vicious but I was up to the challenge if I may ever so humbly say so myself. It was quite stimulating but also a huge waste of time due to the high percentage of name calling clowns and their laughable simple mindedness and worse. A lot of them used to "lose it" which was hilarious.
One really useful tool over there is Unz's archives of old magazines, which are a real treasure. I used to spend days at that site and uncovered tons of gems.
I like your military strategy and share it! Give me a contentious fool any day to be a foil for my arguments! Unz, like Taibbi and Greenwald, attracts a lot of the guys (in particular) showing off, so I can see where that would be both a blast and a huge waste of time. Thanks for taking one for the truth-telling team!
"...lot of the guys (in particular) showing off..."
Now that you mention it, there were a few women, most of whom were excellent, but the place was definitely overrun with ignorant mouthy males doin the strut. It was fun knocking them back into their places, but they always came back. Must've been gluttons for punishment.
This is THE PERFECT article of truth.
Thank you, Tereza! You did a great job on this, assembling key pieces of the puzzle and presenting them in a very understandable way. When more good people see this information, they will understand why our parasite overclass has made discussion of such awareness taboo.
Interesting how Zionists' outrageous behavior has so rapidly undermined the power of the "Jew Taboo". A key weapon is going limp. Will our good (or even just smart) Jewish friends withdraw support from the central banking families in time? Have you seen this brilliant analysis from Neo Liberal Feudalism? :
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-complicated-relationship-between
That's an astute observation, Jerome. I agree with you, the blatancy of this genocidal assault has broken the dam that made any criticism of Jews forbidden. If that's true is the US, imagine the response in the rest of the world. I'll read your article with interest, thanks for your attention to this episode and all the comments on it.
Thank you, dear Tereza! Another genius piece by you!
Thank you for providing all these details, information. Truth is coming out thanks to people like you.
Like Cliff High is saying - humans will be analyzing, questioning 6,000 years of our existence! It is a lot of questioning to do. :) :) :) . even in the past 100 years... of all the lies we have been told.. but there comes a day we cannot tolerate the lies any longer!
I just finished the stack on geoengineering... oh, boy! Cannot look at this horror at the Sky!
https://open.substack.com/pub/dontdespairwegotit/p/what-are-they-spraying-over-us-every?r=z0xoi&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
We got to do something!
Thanks for reading and your kind comment, Masha. I agree that the lies are coming out in a way that seems unprecedented.
Thanks for the link to your post! Yes, the geoengineering is hard. I'm trying to train myself to see the formations as beautiful, since I can't do anything about them, just so I don't get depressed every time I look up. I have these episodes on it:
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/under-the-ominous-sky
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/white-sky-blues
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/hazy-daze-and-tinfoil-skies
Well done! - thank you for the great work you do.
Excellent icon!
thank you! - it helps remind me we are so much more than we real - ize haha :)
Thank you Teresa for your thoughts and research. I am left wondering, however, what the US had to gain from entering the Great War? What leverage did the Zionists have at the time? It wasn’t because we had altruistic ideas for a safe homeland for the Jews. Knowing about the killing of the Jews in WWII didn’t get us involved then either.
Hi, Camila. The Unz article https://www.unz.com/runz/the-balfour-declaration-and-116000-american-lives/ makes the case that the Zionists did NOT convince Wilson to enter the war but, as he says, "sold the British the Brooklyn Bridge" by claiming that they did. But I don't know if Unz is looking at it as US vs. Germany instead of Bankers Uber Alles, as I would.
He gives the example of US Jews still having relatives in Germany, like "Paul Warburg had helped establish the Federal Reserve, while his brother Max Warburg had remained back home and become a leading banker and important wartime official in his native Germany."
I see that as a one-two punch. The Fed was set up with Rockefeller (who Kissinger worked for until Nixon won, then switched) and Morgan, who was Rothschild's man. That was 1913.
If Germany had offered peace without reparations, the banker who insisted that the Kaiser fund the war 100% with loans would never have been paid. I suspect that was Rothschilds. So he controlled both sides of the war. In the US, he could generate millions of free Fed dollars to fund WWI, as Ron Paul documents they did, or he could collapse the banks and overturn the economy. That, I think was the #1 instigation. But Unz gives plenty of other motivations, none of which came from the Zionists.
Thank you for your quick response. I’ve got more studying to do.