Kennedy and Malone

Is his bid for President compromised before he begins?

In this video, I recount a delightful conversation I had with Ginger Breggin, in which we talked about all the support and great research coming from people like JJ Couey, Mathew Crawford and Mark Kulacz, along with prayers being said for the Breggins by whole conventions of people. They’re feeling very loved, strong and supported. At some point, I asked Ginger if she had a theory on what was up with Kennedy, and why he endorsed someone whose career and statements were so at odds with his own. Ginger said she didn’t but, wait, her husband did and she put me on speaker phone.

For the rest, you have to watch the video. But I will add some more thoughts and quotes below:

---

Here are some syllogisms:

Fact 1A: The Breggins have spent and risked their lives exposing the dangers and intentional harms caused by the collusion between Big Pharma and Big Government.

IF 1B: Their current actions are consistent with their past.

Then 1C: Their goals are consistent with and good for the MFM.

Fact 2A: The business of Robert Malone has been brokering contracts between Big Pharma, Big Philanthropy and Big Gov’t, including the HHS, FDA and WHO, and sometimes interacting with the CIA.

IF 2B: His current actions and goals are consistent with his past.

Then 2C: His actions and goals would subvert the MFM.

Fact 3A: Kennedy has spent and risked his life exposing the dangers and intentional harms caused by the collusion between Big Pharma, Big Philanthropy and Big Gov’t in bioweapons disguised as vaccines but also in food and the environment.

IF 3B: Malone is a spokesperson for Kennedy’s campaign + 2B is true.

Then 3C: Malone would subvert the goals of the MFM if Kennedy was elected and put Malone as the head of a major health agency.

---

The best predictor of anyone’s future behavior is their past behavior. Steve Kirsch made millions in investments, including getting BARDA approval for a repurposed drug to treat Covid (working with Malone). Ed Dowd made millions investing for Blackrock, who—along with other institutional landlords—are aiming to own 40% of all single family homes by 2025. It’s not saying they’re CIA, just that they should be assumed to be consistent unless proven otherwise. As Sherri Tenpenny asks regarding Malone, “Do tigers change their stripes?”

As I’ve often told my daughters, you can’t create conflict, all you can do is bring it to the surface. Unless there’s an underlying conflict in the listener’s mind that they’re trying to ignore, a statement made without hostility won’t evoke emotion. I have no hostility or anger, nor do I want to evoke that in anyone else. Malone’s past is in direct conflict with Kennedy’s past. His current words and actions conflict with Kennedy’s. That leads me to believe his goals as a spokesperson also conflict with Kennedy’s. That’s a problem that needs to be addressed.

---

In the video, I mention a poem by Tessa Lena called Is Your Hero From the CIA?:

Is Your Hero from the CIA?

Here is her poem:

Please do not allow the CIA to trick you into an angry mode.

There is a lot going on in the MFM that perhaps some don’t yet see.

If your hero whom you respect and love is leading you into rage,

If your hero is trying to make you think in terms of “us” and “them”

Maybe your hero is really from the CIA.

Actually, I am pretty sure that such a hero is from the CIA.

Maybe it’s our time to take a breath.

Heroes can be misleading sometimes.

Cheap satisfaction of yelling at the screen is a marketing trick.

Let me repeat: cheap satisfaction of yelling at the screen is a marketing trick.

It may feel good but it’s just talk. By the CIA. mind you. By the CIA.

I’ve never seen my readers angry, full of rage and yelling at the screen. I’ve seen them ask serious questions, engage in critical thinking and look at the consequences of being misled. Will we spend our energy and money to get Kennedy elected as our champion, only to have Malone replace Fauci and go back to business as usual? What is going on in the MFM that ‘some don’t yet see’? And why are we being treated as if we’re emotional and irrational children?

I commented on this that it seemed ambiguous and I didn’t know if that was how she meant it. It seemed like a time when it was important to speak clearly. She responded:

Tereza, thank you for speaking your mind, and I appreciate the mutual respect!! Let me ask you then, do you remember how it all unfolded, and the low blows against Matias and then Robert? Do you remember the very beginning of it? I remember that, and I found it deeply disturbing. There are reasonable ways to disagree with a psychological theory, (although perhaps in the middle of the battle is not the best time for such things), and ways that look like someone thinks they are chasing out the devil while in fact.... Anyway, I thought it was very tragic, and it looked manipulated. I, for one, don't think that even the attack on Desmet's theory was justified, and I have expressed my opinion multiple times. It's a theory. Take it or leave it. Who cares. The Breggins projected their fears on it but it was more of a projection, in my opinion. They are good people. They made fear-based choices, and it snowballed to where we are. And of course there is nothing great about the lawsuit, nothing at all! But Robert didn't start it. And in the end, we have to think about the big picture and the usefulness of everything for the community. …

Let me talk about it from the perspective of the bigger picture. What is a great gift that Robert has that is very good for the world? He can use his mainstream credentials to make the people on the mainstream side listen to him. …

What would you do if you were in the alphabets and wanted to take him out? You would want to remove his ability to build bridges and you would want to discredit him for both sides, both in the mainstream as an anti-vaxxer, and in the MFM as a not-an-anti-vaxxer-enough. All those things are very complex, and conflicts are planted routinely, And yes, it involves personality flaws. Both the Breggins and Robert Malone acted very angrily and irrationally, and we can ask, why is that? Why is it that they suddenly started acting like somebody poisoned their soup, and as a result, the vibe in the entire movement got unproductive, tormented and angry? … In other words, I don't think Malone is CO. I think he is being targeted, and he is helping his enemies, I think same is true for the Breggins. And I appreciate the good work all of them have done. …

What I am trying to say is that the Breggins and Robert need our help. We need to focus on prayer for clarity and healing, it doesn't matter who said what, people say stupid things when they are off balance and especially when they are helped into acting self-destructive. it's a philosophical matter but also a very practical natter. They need our help, and if we can focus on prayer for clarity and spiritually clear and good resolution, we will do a fantastic job all together toward the victory against the tyrants of the world.

I mentioned to Tessa that I’d cited the first four articles from the Breggins that ‘started this’ in my episode In Defense of the Breggins and I didn’t see any low blows against Desmet or Malone, or ‘chasing out the devil.’ What I saw was a brilliant analysis of the trauma that had been inflicted on us. I asked Tessa to use the links in my article and show me what she meant, but she hasn’t responded to that.

I don’t think it’s possible to ‘attack’ a theory, for the reason Tessa states. It’s just a theory. It should be deeply scrutinized as a narrative explaining how people have come to be so obedient to authority, but that isn’t an attack on Desmet or Malone. To say that it’s a fear-based projection again confuses me. Does Tessa believe that ‘conspiracy theorists’ would never be medicated ‘for their own good’? That the Breggins and those exposing the plot would never be targeted? Or that there is no plot in which the DoD or CIA is colluding?

The Breggins write in those articles:

In reality, totalitarianism uses propaganda, terror, bullying, and murder to reduce the population to a helpless, dependent, and desperate state typical of victims of totalitarian dictators. … We hope Malone is unaware of and will now disavow Desmet’s psychiatric labeling and undermining of researchers and writers who are investigating globally organized assaults on humanity, and the accusation that we cause mass psychoses. This is unjust to the researchers and writers and can only protect those behind the increasing power of the global totalitarian institutions.

Malone answered by posting: “Unlike those who have been “black pilled” and who conclude overwhelming grand conspiracies as the explanation for everything having to do with the COVIDcrisis, I try to constrain my interpretations by the boundaries of the verifiable.” That is an attack on people, not ideas. The Breggins wrote in response:

Malone has now declared that the conservative movement can be divided into two groups. The “okay” group consists of those who have been “red-pilled” into their beliefs. But the supposed extremists, like those who examine or witness conspiracies, have been “black pilled.” It is an ugly accusation. It demeans those who thoughtfully examine the roots of totalitarianism and encourages those who wish to ridicule and condemn them.

To Tessa’s comment, Laura Garcia, an attorney and mother of three, answered:

Tessa... don’t be an apologist for bad behavior in the name of being an advocate of love in the world. Sometimes tough love is necessary to ensure that true love is not corrupted by those who would exploit one’s desire to believe in good to the point of ignoring trouble, evil, ill intent or malfeasance in one’s midst.

Should we not, on your premise of going along to get along embrace Fauci?

How is it at this point that so many have come to know of Fauci’s lies? Even Malone claiming to only recently have come to see the lies?

Was it not through questioning and trying to reconcile experience and facts with what we are told?

In part, you are suggesting that once the freedom movement was established we must embrace any and all that grab the label and attach it to themselves in the name of what is good and just? But isn’t that exactly what the likes of Gates, Schwab, Soros, Fauci et al did in the name of public health?

Sorry. No offense intended but it begins to feel like that you are asking us to surrender our critical thinking skills at perhaps the most critical hour in this battle and to simply trust our fate to those who claim to be doing good for our benefit.

Think of it like this....I was awake before Malone about the mRNA vaccines and the danger they presented.....so why should I defer to him? Why should I thank him and be grateful for what he brings to the table....so far, especially compared to others in the MFM, he has brought very little of any new information to my awareness. I mean that sincerely....I have learned little from him.

Second, I ask questions and stay vigilant because of my love and caution for my fellow man....not who or a need to agitate. I am a mom....that compels me. And as I learned in the education space....the moms are operating from the purest form of love in rooting out what may harm or compromise the health and well being of our children. And having been on the receiving end of the patriarchal and misogynistic behaviors that have allowed the world to evolve from a place of power and control....like Tereza....your seeming acceptance of the “flawed” personalities (is that all it really is? ) and insistence that it is best to go along to get along....is beyond concerning knowing what is at stake.

Finally, Malone himself has exhibited repeatedly this air of it was all just a colossal blunder of small minded bureaucrats and we need to love our neighbor to heal....yeah, sorry....that was a tell for me nearly 6 months ago.

Do you ever wonder if Malone will be the new head of the FDA especially if Kennedy were to succeed? I do, and the thought of that makes me sick to my stomach. Can’t even explain....but my stomach has saved my life on more than one occasion when following the experts would have virtually guaranteed my premature death.

Margie wrote, “the lamentable conflict, as you call it, is the conflict between deep state vivisectionists and we the people. the proles, the plebes, the dummies, the lab rats.” Tessa answered:

Well, if I wanted to start a courthouse about Malone and Breggins, I would have done that. What I did though was posting a poem guarding against individuals who no one may suspect who are doing the work of division. And that is what I want to keep the focus on, on this page. Goes without saying, each of us makes up our own idea of the world, whom we like, whom we dislike, I just caution against getting carried away (because usually when that happens, good people make fools out of themselves. Whenever somebody starts acting like they are "casting out the devil," madness ensues, and it never fails. But I have a well-formed opinion, and I am convinced that both sides (and many of us) have been played. Sometimes things are not black and white at all! And there is a big difference between a sincere human being with a unique story and imperfections and a predator. Big, big difference. That is my opinion, and I stand by it based on giving it a rather thorough investigation of my own.

So when Tessa says, “Actually, I am pretty sure that such a hero is from the CIA,” she means those who suspect others of being CIA, which is causing the anger, rage and yelling that I’ve yet to see. This is similar to Malone’s definition of 5G Warfare as fighting against those creating division, aka accusing him of being controlled opposition. Against them we all need to be online warriors. I’m sad, dismayed and concerned, but by no means enraged, that Tessa is answering that call.

If Malone is, as he’s described himself, the tip of the spear, the Breggins are the shield. Do we stand behind the spear or the shield?

---

For the full links and quotes, to see the origins of the conflict for yourself, here is In Defense of the Breggins, Part One and Part Two:

I examine the lawsuit filed by Robert Malone against the Breggins and some questions that might be useful: 1) Who is Malone's attorney and what else has he done? 2) What do they call the core defamation? 3) What are the Breggins' concerns and are they valid? 4) Has Malone given conflicting information about his past? and 5) Does Malone engage in the practices over which he's suing?

and these are the two I recommend in the video, Reversing the Reset:

With the consequences of the Great Reset becoming evident, but even those affected not wanting to see it, what's the most helpful thing we can do? I give the perspective of A Course in Miracles, having just finished the 670 pp manual once again. I look at The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow for an anthropology of anarchy. Vladimir Putin's June 17th address at St. Petersburg was an astute analysis of Europe and the US, with economic policies for Russia that support small business and home ownership. I apply his principles to the micro-communities we may need to start when economies in the West come crashing down, and show why it could be better than we'd dared to hope.

and Winning Hearts, Changing Minds:

The inspiration for this episode is the book Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard by Chip Heath and Dan Heath. They cite The Bad Popcorn Study and why you don't have a people problem, Chocolate Chip Cookies vs Radishes and willpower exhaustion, and how to direct the Rider and motivate the Elephant. I apply these to our mission to change the global economy to enable communities to be self-reliant. In the process, I bring in the world's best flourless chocolate cake, my daughter's wedding, my leaky refrigerator, and aerial ballet Buddhas.