Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nefahotep's avatar

Excellent post, very revealing as to the patterns of Power, how it becomes used to "milk" the local culture, to create servitude. Through pattern recognition, this arrangement of control looks very much like what we see today in nearly every facet.

Of Genesis:

"14 And Joseph gathered all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and the land of Chanaan, in return for the corn which they bought, and he distributed corn to them; and Joseph brought all the money into the house of Pharao.

15 And all the money failed out of the land of Egypt, and out of the land of Chanaan; and all the Egyptians came to Joseph, saying, Give us bread, and why do we die in thy presence? for our money is spent.

16 And Joseph said to them, Bring your cattle, and I will give you bread for your cattle, if your money is spent.

17 And they brought their cattle to Joseph; and Joseph gave them bread in return for their horses, and for their sheep, and for their oxen, and for their asses; and Joseph maintained them with bread for all their cattle in that year."

Create obligation (Taxes) out of creating dependence (Bread), while removing the instruments of Independence (Cattle and Sheep) with the existing system of kingship of Egypt. Using the Power of that kingship to sever the local farmers and tradesmen from their claim to their own Land and Homes. --- seems strikingly familiar to what we see today, throughout the Western "Democratic" Empire. Eminent Domain with split titles and Land Deeds.

Usurpation with Usury indeed. "Contractual Annexation Principle by another name."

Usury -- Today we pay interest on nearly everything, usury is at the center of Taxation.

Usurpation -- Trust is the First part of that, in both the Economic and Legal System, Trusts essentially represent an inversion of what "Trust" is supposed to be.

Also, the real Title of Kingship:

I am certain the term "Pharao" is refering to a "Big House" and not the true titular praenomen:

King of Egypt used as a King’s praenomen was: nijˈsiːwat biˈjaːtVj (reconstructed) IPA -- OR -- nɛsuːt biyātyi -- the way I have come to pronounce it: Neshua for practical use (English speaker)

Wiki on Pharaoh:

"From Ancient Greek Φαραώ (Pharaṓ), from Hebrew פַּרְעֹה (par'ōh), from Egyptian pr-ꜥꜣ (“palace, pharaoh”, literally “pr (“house”) + ꜥꜣ (“great, big”)”)."

I am certain this term was used or introduced by those who came from outside of Egypt, then later passed their ideas on to be perpetuated into the story inversion called the OT. The way the term Pharao is used in Genesis is almost like how we use the term "White House," here in the US; it's where the President lives but it's not his title. Pharao may really have been a late linguistic addition to the culture, possibly late New Kingdom.

This post helps to illustrate many of the complex details to be found in other writings that describe the events of the OT, such as Admonitions of Ipuwer. Thanks for sharing, Tereza.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Reece's avatar

Thank you for your diligent work. Their rôle seems identical to the one described in Solzhenitsyn's "200 Years Together" - a tax-collector class between peasants and their figure-head rulers. Who would expect people selling their independence for food in a time of famine? ;-P

Expand full comment
47 more comments...

No posts