The genius behind Germany's economic miracle was Gottfried Feder, who achieved full employment, ended war reparations, and kicked out the banking cartel.
Setting the record straight! Someone has to do it. Thanks for this, Tereza. And for adding levity in doing so:
"meanwhile back at the reich" 😂
"I wonder if Israel is another sacrifice zone, like Ukraine, like Germany."
I think so. Looks that way. Obviously there's no loyalty among this class of controllers - except to themselves. Whole peoples and countries mean nothing in their pursuit. As you know I think this is the result of a non-human interference/infiltration and fortunately they can't continue for much longer.
Still, they have, are and will continue to do a lot of damage on their way out. Thanks for assisting with the 'shed' and loosening those control narratives. The more of us who see through the lies, the quicker we can get to the other side.
Interesting and serendipitous, encountering this after reading Ron Unz's latest piece on "the true history of World War II." Long and involved, with abundant references, and absolutely devastating to all the official narratives (he doesn't mention Rothschild, though; I don't suppose anyone can think of everything). Link: https://www.unz.com/runz/the-true-history-of-world-war-ii/ Have fun!
Today I’m posting one on the genius behind Germany’s economic miracle, Gottfried Feder, who achieved full employment, ended war reparations, and kicked out the banking cartel. In revenge, Rothschild set up his illegitimate grandson, Adolf Schicklgruber, as an actor to play Hitler, even imitating Feder’s iconic mustache. Putting Goebbels and Schacht in charge, Schicklgruber undermined Feder’s economy, forced Germany into war, and then sabotaged the military. When his job was done, he exited by faking his suicide “going to it like it was just another day.” Which it was.
I'll post another reply with this link to Kevin Barrett, who I see has commented there.
Thank you, Philip! Yes, at some point I had to stop turning over rocks and hit 'post.' Nearly all of the research, however, is just from Wikipedia. By putting together different accounts that contradict each other, giving them the 'sniff test' and using common sense, a whole different reality emerges.
In the text, I wanted to show the discrepancies between the 25 points of the German Worker's Party--which might have become the National Socialist Freedom Party--and Schicklgruber's allies and funding sources. They're completely opposite.
I think that when 'International Jewry' declared war on Germany because of Hitler, it was as orchestrated as YT cancelling Malone, giving him street cred. It set up the Havara Transfer, where 'Hitler' played his part, seemingly forced into it.
My major takeaway, though, was extremely hopeful. Germany had a beautiful Parliamentary system, with people of great intelligence and integrity. They developed plans that worked. They weren't a violent, hate-filled people. And I don't think they were fooled by Schicklgruber. He was never elected. It was all a coup.
Perhaps this knot that requires so much entangling does need to start from 4500 years ago. I don’t know if you have the bandwidth to do this, but might you put all your stack pieces in order of how they could be read to provide a more chronological picture? It’s so damn overwhelming, T. And this could really be one of the biggest knots to entangle in our whole delusional mess.
Thank you for pointing me to this, Tonika! I downloaded The Collected Writings so I can peruse them off-line. Interesting that it's "Published in Kali Yuga, 130 AH."
There's much I'm interested in here but it's too bad that 'Was Will Adolf Hitler?' hasn't been translated, to my knowledge. Written in 1931, he says that Hitler betrayed the German people a few years later. So I wonder if this really is the recruiting document it's said to be.
Perhaps the opening bio of Hitler, which is obvious hagiography, is what's said to be that. I don't believe a word of it. He definitely wrote the Manifesto on Farming, as he says he did, signed by Hitler, and the 25 Points, signed by Hitler.
It's interesting that the footnotes say that the expropriation of land is primarily directed against Jewish corporations in land speculation. Haven't we been told that the reason Jews have been forced to engage in usury is because they were forbidden to own land? But not, apparently, to own it through corporations that erase their liability and only profit, while leasing it to those who do the work?
I agree that I think this is one of the biggest knots in our whole delusional mess. When you say, put my posts in chronological order, do you mean ones that deal with anthropology and religion, going into book chapters on the history of money, then into the world wars?
I meant only for those that sora to the Hitler question.
I seem to remember seeing a newspaper article from the 30s in German that has the title of Jews declare war on Germany. Don’t know if it was real. Don’t remember where I saw it. But I remember thinking if true, how peculiar. I don’t know why they weren’t allowed to own land. Why not? Why would we prevent anyone from trying to homestead or contribute to society through land ownership? Although I seem to remember similar rules in BG. I think they passed a law in which Russians couldn’t buy up land because the entire coast was becoming Russian owned Since they had more money. Perhaps it’s more tied into keeping nationals more tethered to the land and having ability for wealth growth?
Either way, sorry to be ADHD in this comment, I do think Feder had some anti-Semitic sentiments, even those outside of the bankers. Although it’s just hard to dispel what one might have thought Judaism is in the first place? Perhaps it’s more accurate to say he had anti-Talmudic sentiments? Was he against the religion or the race? How did he define “Jew”? This knot is sticky and wet and not in a good way.
Ah. It is hard to untangle that. My WW2ruth article posted them in the order of my journey, but combined both the history and the ideology of the Torah. It does require looking at both to understand.
So it's in 1933, the exact year that 'Hitler' became 'kanzler'. This is a super-interesting archive, that I haven't seen before, of ALL the quotes stating their purpose in that 'war.' Here's some: "The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world." - Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely, The New York Tribune, March 29, 1939.
"In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to re-conquer it." - Louis Marschalko, "The World Conquerors : The Real War Criminals."
"We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry... Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy's fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory." - Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York.
The confusion is thinking of 'Semitism' as a race rather than 'Shemitism,' which is the God-given right to rule over others, and for them to be your slaves. It's a 'religion' of racial supremacy. That's why my Empire & Religion series bleeds into anthropology, because it's the same Aryan masterminds who replaced the goddess societies with a culture that condoned rape as the 'just reward' of conquest.
If you think of the Yahwists as a mafia, in which whatever they do to others is--not only condoned by God--but required to advance their own, would you want them living next door? 'Israel' is a diaspora empire, in which the playbook, going back 5000 yrs, is 'ingratiate, infiltrate, usurp' or 'first honey, then atrocity.'
In the Pale of Settlement in Russia, the Jews took over all the 'middlemen' positions but did no manual labor. In 137 countries who kicked them out, we have to ask 'why?' Are the Jews the only ethical people on earth and everyone else racist, or is there a problem with the behavior of this group?
It's a question we all need to answer for ourselves. Feder is very specific in what behaviors he's against:
"What do we mean by Thralldom of Interest? The condition of peoples under the money domination of the finance of the world Jewry.
"The land-owner is under this thralldom, who has to raise loans to finance his farming operations, — loans at such high interest as almost to eat up the results of his labor —, or who is forced to make debts and to drag the mortgages after him like so much weight of lead.
"So is the worker, producing in shops and factories for a pittance, whilst the shareholder draws dividends and bonuses which he has not worked for.
"So is the earning middle class, whose work goes almost entirely to pay the interest on bank overdrafts.
"So are all who must earn their bread by mental or bodily work, whilst a comparatively small proportion, without labor or trouble, pocket huge profits out of their dividends, speculations and bank shares."
You might appreciate the recent Doc Malik & Jack Kruse discussion, if you haven't watched. 2.5 hours - I'm about an hour in, though I find Kruse had to follow. But he notes Hitler as a psyop and discusses the larger chess game behind the narratives we were given.
I guess where it gets murky for me is when he says things like “The Jew lacks creative spirit… a parasitic race leeching Aryan vitality.” - it’s indicative of him thinking of Jews not just as culturally different but as biologically inferior.
I know you have done tons more research on the subject than I have. I want to do more and I’ll follow the threads (I also need to read my own links that I dropped in here thoroughly. Ha.) - my concern is that some of the conclusions made by some of these people (Feder, Hitler, et al) wade into hateful territory and it doesn’t keep it objective which is not my desire to absorb. Just no way of avoiding it without looking through those eyes, you know?
Hitler's father did change his name, we're told, before Adolf was born when his grandmother married Heidler and 'legitimized' him. Adolf's father was born as Alois Schicklgruber from his mother's name, Maria Anna Schicklgruber. As a bastard child, he was given his mother's name.
He cites: "Hitler's grandmother, a Fraulein Maria Anna Schicklgruber, worked as a cook for a well-to-do Jewish family named Frankenberger. The Frankenbergers had a son who was nineteen years old at the time Hitler's forty-two-year-old grandmother bore a child out of wedlock, and the Jewish family paid for the support of the child up to the time it was fourteen years old. Frank wrote that the money was given to avoid a public scandal. Apparently, although Frank does not say so, Fraeulein Schicklgruber had threatened to bring a suit against the Frankenbergers. Frank wrote that many letters were subsequently exchanged between them and Hitler's grandmother, which seemed to him to be evidence of a cordial relationship. Nevertheless, both he and Hitler were convinced that the child was actually the offspring of a millworker, Johann Georg Hiedler, a second cousin of Fraeulein Schicklgruber, who five years after the birth of the child married her and legitimized her son. But Frank, writing in Nuremberg no longer for the benefit of the Fuehrer, was also of the opinion that it was not out of the question that Hitler's father, who later changed his name from Hiedler to Hitler, was half Jewish."
Given this, I recant my suspicion about being Rothschild's grandson, although not his secret agent. Frankenberger paying until Alois was 14, even though she married Heidler when he was 5, seems likely Alois was a Frankenberger. And if Hitler was going to make something up, it seems like they'd fabricate a non-Jew. Good question!
Excellent! Thank you for putting in the work so we could all find out where that stench was coming from. None of the other stories made sense.
Thank you. You just tied up the Gregorian knot.
Setting the record straight! Someone has to do it. Thanks for this, Tereza. And for adding levity in doing so:
"meanwhile back at the reich" 😂
"I wonder if Israel is another sacrifice zone, like Ukraine, like Germany."
I think so. Looks that way. Obviously there's no loyalty among this class of controllers - except to themselves. Whole peoples and countries mean nothing in their pursuit. As you know I think this is the result of a non-human interference/infiltration and fortunately they can't continue for much longer.
Still, they have, are and will continue to do a lot of damage on their way out. Thanks for assisting with the 'shed' and loosening those control narratives. The more of us who see through the lies, the quicker we can get to the other side.
Glad someone got that little joke ;-)
We definitely agree on the no-loyalty.
Interesting and serendipitous, encountering this after reading Ron Unz's latest piece on "the true history of World War II." Long and involved, with abundant references, and absolutely devastating to all the official narratives (he doesn't mention Rothschild, though; I don't suppose anyone can think of everything). Link: https://www.unz.com/runz/the-true-history-of-world-war-ii/ Have fun!
Thanks, Steven! I had already posted this there:
I’m glad to see this coming out and have been pursuing my own journey into WW2ruth:
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/ww2ruth-liberation-day
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/corbett-unz-and-wwii-the-unnecessary
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/churchills-atrocities
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-trials-of-david-irving
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/kissinger-and-the-balfour-declaration
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/my-hitler-journey
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/fiddler-on-the-truth
Today I’m posting one on the genius behind Germany’s economic miracle, Gottfried Feder, who achieved full employment, ended war reparations, and kicked out the banking cartel. In revenge, Rothschild set up his illegitimate grandson, Adolf Schicklgruber, as an actor to play Hitler, even imitating Feder’s iconic mustache. Putting Goebbels and Schacht in charge, Schicklgruber undermined Feder’s economy, forced Germany into war, and then sabotaged the military. When his job was done, he exited by faking his suicide “going to it like it was just another day.” Which it was.
I'll post another reply with this link to Kevin Barrett, who I see has commented there.
Nice diving!
The more you sniff, the more it smells.
Thank you, Philip! Yes, at some point I had to stop turning over rocks and hit 'post.' Nearly all of the research, however, is just from Wikipedia. By putting together different accounts that contradict each other, giving them the 'sniff test' and using common sense, a whole different reality emerges.
In the text, I wanted to show the discrepancies between the 25 points of the German Worker's Party--which might have become the National Socialist Freedom Party--and Schicklgruber's allies and funding sources. They're completely opposite.
I think that when 'International Jewry' declared war on Germany because of Hitler, it was as orchestrated as YT cancelling Malone, giving him street cred. It set up the Havara Transfer, where 'Hitler' played his part, seemingly forced into it.
My major takeaway, though, was extremely hopeful. Germany had a beautiful Parliamentary system, with people of great intelligence and integrity. They developed plans that worked. They weren't a violent, hate-filled people. And I don't think they were fooled by Schicklgruber. He was never elected. It was all a coup.
Thanks for reading through this!
funny that the Three Stooges used the name Schickelgruber in one of their WWII shorts as a slang for the nazi's.
Didn't know where that came from.
Oh that's really funny!
I’ve been meaning to dive into this and has saved these links to explore Feder since your mention of him:
https://zlib.pub/book/the-collected-writings-of-gottfried-feder-4546b2hnn6a0
https://archive.org/details/federcollectedwritings/mode/1up?view=theater
Perhaps this knot that requires so much entangling does need to start from 4500 years ago. I don’t know if you have the bandwidth to do this, but might you put all your stack pieces in order of how they could be read to provide a more chronological picture? It’s so damn overwhelming, T. And this could really be one of the biggest knots to entangle in our whole delusional mess.
Thank you for pointing me to this, Tonika! I downloaded The Collected Writings so I can peruse them off-line. Interesting that it's "Published in Kali Yuga, 130 AH."
There's much I'm interested in here but it's too bad that 'Was Will Adolf Hitler?' hasn't been translated, to my knowledge. Written in 1931, he says that Hitler betrayed the German people a few years later. So I wonder if this really is the recruiting document it's said to be.
Perhaps the opening bio of Hitler, which is obvious hagiography, is what's said to be that. I don't believe a word of it. He definitely wrote the Manifesto on Farming, as he says he did, signed by Hitler, and the 25 Points, signed by Hitler.
It's interesting that the footnotes say that the expropriation of land is primarily directed against Jewish corporations in land speculation. Haven't we been told that the reason Jews have been forced to engage in usury is because they were forbidden to own land? But not, apparently, to own it through corporations that erase their liability and only profit, while leasing it to those who do the work?
I agree that I think this is one of the biggest knots in our whole delusional mess. When you say, put my posts in chronological order, do you mean ones that deal with anthropology and religion, going into book chapters on the history of money, then into the world wars?
I meant only for those that sora to the Hitler question.
I seem to remember seeing a newspaper article from the 30s in German that has the title of Jews declare war on Germany. Don’t know if it was real. Don’t remember where I saw it. But I remember thinking if true, how peculiar. I don’t know why they weren’t allowed to own land. Why not? Why would we prevent anyone from trying to homestead or contribute to society through land ownership? Although I seem to remember similar rules in BG. I think they passed a law in which Russians couldn’t buy up land because the entire coast was becoming Russian owned Since they had more money. Perhaps it’s more tied into keeping nationals more tethered to the land and having ability for wealth growth?
Either way, sorry to be ADHD in this comment, I do think Feder had some anti-Semitic sentiments, even those outside of the bankers. Although it’s just hard to dispel what one might have thought Judaism is in the first place? Perhaps it’s more accurate to say he had anti-Talmudic sentiments? Was he against the religion or the race? How did he define “Jew”? This knot is sticky and wet and not in a good way.
Ah. It is hard to untangle that. My WW2ruth article posted them in the order of my journey, but combined both the history and the ideology of the Torah. It does require looking at both to understand.
Yes, here's the link to that newspaper article: https://ia802303.us.archive.org/19/items/jews-declare-war-on-germany-1933/JewsDeclareWarOnGermany1933.pdf.
So it's in 1933, the exact year that 'Hitler' became 'kanzler'. This is a super-interesting archive, that I haven't seen before, of ALL the quotes stating their purpose in that 'war.' Here's some: "The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world." - Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely, The New York Tribune, March 29, 1939.
"In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to re-conquer it." - Louis Marschalko, "The World Conquerors : The Real War Criminals."
"We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry... Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy's fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory." - Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York.
The confusion is thinking of 'Semitism' as a race rather than 'Shemitism,' which is the God-given right to rule over others, and for them to be your slaves. It's a 'religion' of racial supremacy. That's why my Empire & Religion series bleeds into anthropology, because it's the same Aryan masterminds who replaced the goddess societies with a culture that condoned rape as the 'just reward' of conquest.
If you think of the Yahwists as a mafia, in which whatever they do to others is--not only condoned by God--but required to advance their own, would you want them living next door? 'Israel' is a diaspora empire, in which the playbook, going back 5000 yrs, is 'ingratiate, infiltrate, usurp' or 'first honey, then atrocity.'
In the Pale of Settlement in Russia, the Jews took over all the 'middlemen' positions but did no manual labor. In 137 countries who kicked them out, we have to ask 'why?' Are the Jews the only ethical people on earth and everyone else racist, or is there a problem with the behavior of this group?
It's a question we all need to answer for ourselves. Feder is very specific in what behaviors he's against:
"What do we mean by Thralldom of Interest? The condition of peoples under the money domination of the finance of the world Jewry.
"The land-owner is under this thralldom, who has to raise loans to finance his farming operations, — loans at such high interest as almost to eat up the results of his labor —, or who is forced to make debts and to drag the mortgages after him like so much weight of lead.
"So is the worker, producing in shops and factories for a pittance, whilst the shareholder draws dividends and bonuses which he has not worked for.
"So is the earning middle class, whose work goes almost entirely to pay the interest on bank overdrafts.
"So are all who must earn their bread by mental or bodily work, whilst a comparatively small proportion, without labor or trouble, pocket huge profits out of their dividends, speculations and bank shares."
You might appreciate the recent Doc Malik & Jack Kruse discussion, if you haven't watched. 2.5 hours - I'm about an hour in, though I find Kruse had to follow. But he notes Hitler as a psyop and discusses the larger chess game behind the narratives we were given.
https://docmalik.substack.com/p/341-jack-kruse-bitcoin-banking-elites?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=1696390&post_id=165228650&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=4z7ci&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
I guess where it gets murky for me is when he says things like “The Jew lacks creative spirit… a parasitic race leeching Aryan vitality.” - it’s indicative of him thinking of Jews not just as culturally different but as biologically inferior.
I know you have done tons more research on the subject than I have. I want to do more and I’ll follow the threads (I also need to read my own links that I dropped in here thoroughly. Ha.) - my concern is that some of the conclusions made by some of these people (Feder, Hitler, et al) wade into hateful territory and it doesn’t keep it objective which is not my desire to absorb. Just no way of avoiding it without looking through those eyes, you know?
Where is the Schicklgruber coming from? I thought Hitler’s father was Heidler which became Hitler (or was that all added later to muddy the waters).
Hitler's father did change his name, we're told, before Adolf was born when his grandmother married Heidler and 'legitimized' him. Adolf's father was born as Alois Schicklgruber from his mother's name, Maria Anna Schicklgruber. As a bastard child, he was given his mother's name.
In some accounts, I've read she was a chambermaid in Amschel Rothschild's hotel suite. In this account from Nuremburg, Hans Frank had done the research under Hitler: https://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/nurembergfrank.html.
He cites: "Hitler's grandmother, a Fraulein Maria Anna Schicklgruber, worked as a cook for a well-to-do Jewish family named Frankenberger. The Frankenbergers had a son who was nineteen years old at the time Hitler's forty-two-year-old grandmother bore a child out of wedlock, and the Jewish family paid for the support of the child up to the time it was fourteen years old. Frank wrote that the money was given to avoid a public scandal. Apparently, although Frank does not say so, Fraeulein Schicklgruber had threatened to bring a suit against the Frankenbergers. Frank wrote that many letters were subsequently exchanged between them and Hitler's grandmother, which seemed to him to be evidence of a cordial relationship. Nevertheless, both he and Hitler were convinced that the child was actually the offspring of a millworker, Johann Georg Hiedler, a second cousin of Fraeulein Schicklgruber, who five years after the birth of the child married her and legitimized her son. But Frank, writing in Nuremberg no longer for the benefit of the Fuehrer, was also of the opinion that it was not out of the question that Hitler's father, who later changed his name from Hiedler to Hitler, was half Jewish."
Given this, I recant my suspicion about being Rothschild's grandson, although not his secret agent. Frankenberger paying until Alois was 14, even though she married Heidler when he was 5, seems likely Alois was a Frankenberger. And if Hitler was going to make something up, it seems like they'd fabricate a non-Jew. Good question!
I can't read all of this, but it complements my latest post.
Link, please?
https://open.substack.com/pub/knuthamsun812160/p/life-in-hitlers-germany-an-outline?r=3i1klx&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false