finished this video while glancing at your book that i cant wait to dig in =) Loved how you precised defeding the 7 millions wonders instead of the sheperd of them. You know i still have the same opinion on Russel brand, and its quite the same for tucker, peterson, mariannaspring, carolyn jarvis, joe rogan, icks and alex jones, the ald-tabatai of this world and all the gatekeepers who works well to do the pied piper song.
I do agree that good speach said from bad mouth is still good speach if we dont associate with the mouth that speaks them. We both already know where we dont agree and i do know you dont like when i say: we agree to disagree hehe. So i hope my revised version of the impact of russel and your revised version of the 7 wonders will maybe agree to agree.
Anyway, we should all be our own sheperd. Take from someone what is good and leave what is bad (metaphoricly speaking and related to teachings) the same sentence would be quite a sentence (consequence) if it was taken from a phisical point of view instead of spiritual one. LOL
If not, well i still appreciate you a LOT for all you have done yet and will still be doing in the futur. its a great plus for our community and i'll thank you 7 million times! hehe
ps: when pointing at end of your video, you probly showned you tube links but on substack your pointing thin air =P that was amusing. and now i'll go subscribe to your youtube. thanks
I love Russell without any reservations or apologies to the Johney-come-Lately's, like Matthew Crawford and in spite of the validations and approval of newly awakened like Tucker or Petersen.
I offer unsolicited advice: beware of the podcast circle jerkers, those who interview the interviewers and the few people they want to promote amongst their "approved thoughts" clique. The repetition of what is being said from channel to channel and platform to platform challenges the CIA's Mockingbird program for The Most Insidious Cancer to Society Award. Not one of them would dare ask a "regular person" what they think and how they came to that conclusion. Not one of the are capable of believing someone - like Russell - could possibly change their life by the grace of God. Too bad for them, that leave them with little hope for themselves of changing.
Amy you are a joy, true to your name. 'Without reservations or apologies'--I'm going to use that line. And 'in spite of the validations and approval of newly awakened like Tucker or Petersen'--excellent! Your unsolicited advice speaks exactly to my suspicion. With the condemnation of anyone with an audience, they get to more and more refined until it's finally only me and thee who are worthy.
For the full argument, this is what I sent to Ahmad in response to Mathew's question, 'Do you trust her? She listens to RB':
Step One in Have a Better Argument: define the question. We both agree that Russell was an important asset to the Illuminati up to and through his 14-mo. marriage to Katy Perry. We both agree that Russell’s role since the sextroversy is to control the opposition to get Trump elected. Same as Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, Malone, RFK, Kirsch, etc. Mission accomplished.
So the question is “Was Russell Brand representing his own views during the interim from 2012 to Sept 2023, when he went back to college in comparative religion and geopolitics, wrote some biographies, got married and had kids, and started a podcast?”
Step Two: Why does it matter? If you are a person who decides whether ideas are right or wrong based on whether a person is good or bad, it matters. If you decide ideas based on facts and logic, it does not. However, deciding that someone IS being controlled helps to figure out what the larger agenda is—like getting Trump elected, unless you have a different theory about the direction that Russell is leading the opposition in.
If you see how Russell has influenced my channel and work, please elaborate because I don’t agree. I had two decades of writing to back those points of agreement before I’d ever heard Russell. Because he was asking the same questions—What is ultimate reality? How do we restructure society—although not coming as consistently to the answers, he gave me a way of presenting my ideas in response to his and reaching a handful of people who’d been drawn to his engagement with those questions.
Like Bitcoin and spirituality, Mathew doesn’t address my points on Russell but states that, as women are wont to do, I am thinking with my vagina. Everyone knows that women are incapable of reason around a sexy guy, unlike men who retain their discernment around beautiful women—which is why they don’t bother to use them in advertising.
If someone insulted Kat [Amhad's wife], I don’t think when she tried to tell her side, you’d say ‘I’m just tired of all the bickering and infighting and want to remain outside of all that.’ Mathew isn’t presenting facts and logic about Russell Brand, he’s calling me and all women gullible and unable to think. He uses the same trick as the Bible, telling men they’re superior to all those hot babes in yoga pants because every guy intuitively knows rapiness is associated with male owners of yoga studios. Right?
By the same token that the Illuminati don’t let people walk out, do trauma-based mind control cults that turned his brother into a charming psychopath who’s probably killed people? I don’t see controlled opposition in people because I disagree with them. I see it when they use insults, ridicule, backstabbing, intimidation and rhetorical tricks to discredit others instead of answering their arguments.
If you’re asking me about Russell because I’m a serious researcher and you want an answer to the question above using the 100+ hours I’ve spent analyzing his conversations, you’ve come to the right place. But as I said in the video, if your question is “Can I trust Russell to think for me?” My answer is no, no matter how good a person he is. And if Mathew’s question is whether you should trust me to think for you, the answer’s always no.
For Russell, as someone whose comedic personae was based on sexual licentiousness, it’s not a scandal to be told he’s sexually licentious. And then there’s Mathew saying “Russell Brand jokes about rape.” I know I don’t need to explain to you how humor works but, as we both know, Mathew doesn’t get it. When Russell says, “I raped a woman once,” he’s created tension. You’re going, OMG, is this a confession? It makes you uncomfortable. And then when he says, “I killed her after,” you laugh because he’s played you. He got you going and pulled the rug out from under you because of that moment when you thought he might be serious. That’s the formula. Jokes 101.
But let’s examine Russell’s trajectory. In 2009 he starts speaking out about Palestine—the Kavernacle video in my Illuminati article has clips. In 2009 he and Katy Perry get together. Coincidence or damage control? He’s at the top of the Illuminati food chain—king and queen of the underworld. Yet he leaves. He was due half of the $44M she earned during the 14 mos. they were together but he doesn’t touch it. Instead he ends up doing luggage ads on his podcast, where he makes a pittance. Suddenly, due to Covid, he skyrockets to 7M subs. Why wouldn’t the Illuminati want him to stay with that? He controlled more of the opposition than anyone else.
If they wanted to give him opposition street cred (which he already had) they would have demonetized him for disinformation. The sex scandal turned off people in the opposition. It wasn’t Covid or the vaccines the PTB were threatened by—that’s four psyops ago—it was his stance on Israel. Anyone can talk about the banks, it’s talking specifically about who’s behind the banks that’s taboo. And the current psyop is Israel, with Trump its front man. What celebrity do you know who’s speaking out and hasn’t been destroyed?
Whew! Glad to use this somewhere. Thanks for the opportunity, Amy, although your statement is much simpler!
Glad to be of service. I haven't followed your dispute with Mathew but when Substack first suggested I follow him I gave him a try. A couple of times. What I recall most about what I read was the feelings I had, kind of like music by a new artist. I felt like he thought himself the last authority on everything and that if I, the reader, didn't recognize that then I must be a "mind-controlled dumbass."
And seriously, if most of us "regular people" do not have suspicions about many of the accounts that have cropped up since we entered (myself, Oct. 2020, I think) than we are not as alternative media source minded as we fancy ourselves.
The covid-crazy times funneled us to this platform somehow, I sure don't remember how I landed here but I do remember being on pages as a "free subscriber" and dialoging as you and I are now, with people that now have so many followers they no longer can reply, like Midwest Doctor and others who "touch" RFK Jr. I find that rather bazaar.
I remember being attuned to the workings of "The International Dark Web" back when Obamalamadingdong was still president and before Dave Rubin bought his baby and Bret Weinstein was chased out of Evergreen and I continue to be befuddled everyday where everyone and all that tripped and landed. But the fact that they were hardened liberals (Young Turk!) and now are held up as vanguards of the new newthink - along with the litany to be found on all the Non-Compliance to Covid Protocols Records helps me to remember that most likely my algorithms are being managed by darker webmasters operating underground in Turin using more energy than Ford MoCo, GMAC and the Rouge Steele plant combined ever needed to control a silly woman of middling age - too old to fantasize about Russell, who I wish was my little brother.
They flatter us by believing we need to be controlled. They feed off us. They need us. Everyone is controlled by something/one, could even be their own ego. We all have things we don't want to be found out, I know I do. I miss the in-person handshake and "how do you do?" that comes before this level of intimacy. Wish you were here.
You are so funny, Amy. I wish you were here too. I've been getting a little more of that in my life, meeting with Mary in realtime--even dancing! And our monthly zoom calls with the Apocaloptimist Club, it gets a step closer to blurring the lines.
Funny also that you mention AMD. I have this one on him/ her: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-psyop-cyclops. I'm just noticing that the YT was removed. When did that happen? I guess these strikes start to run together after awhile. Who can keep track?
And I did a YT on Bret Weinstein that I was just thinking to re-release and put on Substack. I watched it again for my RB article and thought it made some good points. Here it is: https://youtu.be/9UlgpFoaIJc?si=kth70aCMK2FshD7n.
Also, I love that you wish Russell was your little brother. My feeling exactly! One of my friends said his wife thought Russell and I were beginning to look alike, like I was his older sister. I think that must have been an ideological twinship, since I don't see it but I love the concept!
I am happy to see that the covid struggle still beats in some hearts. In fact most people dont want to remember, but I feel it hasnt really gone away. I can not overcome a feeling of defeat and powerlessness about it. The nursing houses massacres have not been i
punished, the perpetrators have got away with it. Its painful, like Gaza. This feeling of being living in the empire of evil. Even today, I receives news about Rainer Fullmich, who is still in prison, and Dr. Bailey, who has been deprived of her doctor licence this week, in New Zeeland. We keep losing. Sunday, I met this woke acquintance who is a leader of the local Extinction Resistance group, a British climatist NGO. She said she was sorry for Gaza and then mentioned Noam Chomsky, who I disapproved for his role in Covid. Then I recived a storm of propaganda about the vaccines, the confinement, the massification in the hospitals... She didnt allow me to speak and if I tried to say something, she wouldnt stop talking. I could feel how a pure ire was growing in me. It was getting physical. I could hardly contain myself. We were in a social gathering and I didnt wanted to ruin the ambience..I had clashes with this dumb in the past and wanted to forget our old arguments. But I couldnt help feeling a deep disgust and hate for the neighboring accomplices of this abomination.
I agree, Yoni, I think it's important we don't forget the CovidCon, even though it's four psyops ago. And yes, the defeats keep coming, with Gaza, with Rainer, with Sam.
There was a time that I was fooled by the Noam, I think you've seen this one of mine since I came to my senses: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/noam-chomsky-is-the-problem. Don't waste your disgust and hate on them, Yoni. It will only hurt you and they'll be oblivious and self-righteous as ever. There are bigger things at play, I think, and the psyops are still coming.
I think most people just dont have a clue, so they desperately try to fit in the right narrative for social promotion purposes. It's like with crypto currencies and Bitcoin. Most people dont know code nor understand what the blockchain technology is. However, they make their bets and put their money in what they perceive to be the winning horses, just because the information perception bubble leads them to make choices. This lady for example, is obsessed with her children being geniuses. She would like to have them studying in a top tier University, but she doesnt have the financial means to do so. So she searches social promotion through civil NGO's, parroting the official messages. Not everybody has money, but everybody has an opinion, right? It is a way of feeling protected too. And after all, what could she do against the allmighty powers that be? I think this is the way liberals and lefties are actually controlled and utilized without them even knowing about it. Chomsky, Berney Sanders, AOC and alike are active actors for this. Little wonder she mentioned him as a referent.
I'm not sure what he's doing now with Trump and his religious re-awakening.
Neither of those is a particular problem to me, it just seems out of character, or that he has taken the path of "born-again" to allay his detractors. Maybe to become more mainstream, not sure.
Backing religious fundamentalism makes my eyebrow go up, especially someone who has been where he has, and seen what he has seen.
To each his own, I guess.
I liked when he was more on par with Jimmy Dore. I like a lot of what the new administration is doing, but there's a lot I don't like too. He doesn't seem to be critical of our Israel policy or "antisemitism witch hunts" that are all the rage with the Right.
When someone does that much of a change in direction, it makes me suspicious. It feels like he has lost his objectivity.
I agree. The time that I listened to him was after he left (I think ran away from) Hollywood and his marriage to Katy Perry and before the sextroversy, when I think he was captured again. I fully suspect he was an important asset to the Illuminati: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/russell-brand-and-the-illuminati.
He was taking a hard stand on Palestine back in 2009, when few were. Right after that is when they sicced Katy on him as his monarch, I think. Those two things seem related.
When he started his Luminary podcast, he'd gone back to college in geopolitics and spirituality. The second video I linked was with his favorite professor, Brad Evans, who had a hard-hitting specialty--torture or systems of enslavement, something like that. Russell was almost a nobody, interviewing a few old friends but mostly nobodies.
His interview with Jimmy Dore was my first introduction to Jimmy, and I really liked the resonance between them. Russell got in a lot of trouble once for saying people shouldn't vote. So he and Jimmy had a common perspective on the left/ right divide.
I had stopped listening before the sextroversy, because of the excessive commercialization and the return of his celebrity, which made his show more slick. But there's no doubt the charges were fabricated, as I say here: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/russell-branded.
The conversion and shilling for Trump, along with his connection to the whole 'swarm' feels forced. I don't think he lost his objectivity. I think the option to express it was taken from him. We are 'one nation under blackmail' and I'm certain they have that on him.
Not sure what more they can get him on that they haven't already.
Seemed he weathered the last one pretty well, but you're right, it must be something.
I think he is still demonetized on YT - I just look at his headlines on Rumble but don't watch generally because he's always a day or two late for me, and I've already heard everything i need on the subject lol.
But he's been a pretty good belweather up until the last 6 months and I've just been kind of baffled with him lately.
Kind of like Jon Stewart, but at least he didn't pin a medal on a nazi.
If I were a dynastic patriarch bent on global domination, I'd get the people I wanted to control onto private boats or planes--at which point, I own them. I'd go through the motions of supplying drinks and drugs but what I'd really do is rufie them or something that takes away all inhibitions and memory. All consciousness but leaves the motor impulses intact. Then I'd have little girls groomed to sexually incriminate. I'd have 'satanic' rituals like Anneke Lucas describes, in which children are killed by other children. Of course, their participation would be on camera.
I think Russell was given some leash, but then they yanked it.
Oh was the Glafia from my friend Mees Baaijen? We're working on a collaboration in the lead-up to May 9th. It was his idea and my name for WW2ruth Liberation Day.
a: destabilize a region through war creating a mass migration
b: use said migration to destabilize a desired country causing the economy to fail
c: buy up land and resources and assume power for pennies on the dollar
Crude and simple, but I believe that's the crux of it. And it spans countries - this is worldwide and local politicians just get bought off like trump with Israel. They're just a means to an end.
Oh and by the way, Blackrock just bought the ports on both sides of the panama canal - how convenient.
Thanks for referencing my article about the attack on Boomer memories! I appreciate you for that.
In respect of Russell Brand, I am sure you remember me telling you that his reputation here in the UK is very mixed. Real Essex blokes don't behave like him and they don't marry up-town girls to curry favour with the predator class for career advancement. I have seldom listened to him because he let our menfolk down with his drugs/sex/self obsessed persona.
He grates Essex nerves!
He is known for posing as a Pied Piper character who made hedonism attractive for a young audience. This went down like a stone with me. Later he seemed to be posing as a reborn Christian, even imitating the standard Jesus appearance. That also hit me as phoney.
I don't know or care what he is doing now. Sucking up to Trump? Yeah... about that! 🙄
I agree with you about Russell’s character. He did, however, have some really good things to say during Covid. If he helped awaken some people and helped others feel less alone during Covid then I see his impact as an overall wash.
Guess what? I just got your book! we can thank Malik for that =) Funny thing, last book i bought was of James True and had 22 chapter, now yours i saw got 21 but i consider the outro as one too so i'll stick with my 22. And thats my fate guiding number so guess how i was PLEASED when it arrived this morning! i'm starting the reading tonight and i'll be taking note. Now i'll have the best view on this caret system of yours and it may take a while. so i wish also to congratulate you on such a big book! lots of information, lots of development (ok i admit since this morning i cheated a little and went ahead peek on many chapters, ending and lexicon) Would have love more words into the lexicon because i am SURE you know of others like these that could be really revealing. pfffff nevermind! your awesome! just saw there is lexicon for every chapter ;)
A big thanks to you and all who helped you wrote it and inspired you.
In the beginning was the purpose... of your book
And in the end... There is me really happy to read you from elsewhere then a computer ;)
What a lovely response to my book, Jean-Sebastien! I like the fate guiding number and I'm going with the 22--or 24 if we count the preface and the prologue. I'm a dozenals gal ;-) It feels very nice to be read by you and I'm so looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
1. First and foremost it is important to always keep in mind that "Celebrities" are created by controllers of mass media platforms.
Quoting Daniel J. Boorstin, "The Image, A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America", 1961:
"Our age has produced a new kind of eminence: the celebrity. His qualities—or rather his lack of qualities—illustrate our peculiar problems. He has been fabricated on purpose to satisfy our exaggerated expectations of human greatness.
1901 - 1914, 74% celebrities came from politics, business, and the professions.
After 1922 over 50% came from the world of entertainment.
1960 nearly all come from the fields of light entertainment, sports, and the night club circuit.
The hero created himself; the celebrity is created by the media."
True there were a lot of talented musicians and bands, but making it to celebrity status is only possible if the controllers of mass media platforms want it.
"However, it caused a sensation when the Beatles arrived in America in 1964. The affectionate term 'Moptops' was created and almost every comedian in the country cracked gags about their hair style. Hundreds of thousands of Beatles wigs were manufactured and it eventually led to the American youth growing their hair longer than had been previously acceptable for a young male."
3. The Beatles as all bands elevated by mass media controllers to celebrity status, were for an objective. The bands themselves may or not be aware that they are being used.
"Besides reformatting a rebellious youth via mass psychology manipulation, this “revolution” would impact youth globally and most importantly provide a perception that the level of freedom existing in the US was not available elsewhere, thereby having the US perceived as the bastion of freedom."
Proof of the above is further provided in this article: How the Beatles Rocked the Kremlin
"As a generation of Soviet kids dared to sing along, they gave up on “building Socialism” and abandoned the beliefs of their parents. “The Cold War was won by the West,” says Troitsky, “not by nuclear missiles, but by the Beatles."
We had been fooled, not only by the Beatles but the whole music and movie scene in the 60s and 70s. The Counterculture counterrevolution was probably one of the greatest mass psychology operations ever.
When my book was published, I tracked for a while it's rating on Amazon, the best I got was on October 29, 2023:
Best Sellers Rank: #5,942 in Books
#1 in Asian Politics
#3 in Globalization and Politics
#15 in History & Theory of Politics.
I was curious to see what book was #1 overall. It was Britney Spears "The Woman in Me"
It had a cover pic, I sure couldn't compete with; half naked woman with arms covering her boobs.
If books are for expanding one's knowledge, then I have absolutely no doubt that your book and mine have a thousand times more substance and value. But neither has a chance to become a "bestseller". That is reserved to manufactured celebrities :-)
Two people who are passionate diehard Beatles fans are James Corbett and Mark Elsis of earthnewspaper.com. It would be hard for me to imagine (pun intended) two more independent thinkers, who base their conclusions on fact and logic. Whether or not Tavistock promoted the Beatles, the Beatles spoke to something in them that didn't lead them into dissolute drug-addled living. The music continues to inspire both of them.
I don't think that the James Dean in you led you astray. It spoke to that restlessness that knew something was deeply wrong with the way things are. He tried to harness that energy into being a rebel without a cause, but you used it to find your cause and keep your idealism. I don't think you were fooled.
As you've seen by my responses to ICE-9, he's now riding the rebellion against the inclusive, free love rebellion and turning it into white superiority over blacks, who are degenerate by nature. And are you really quoting NBC?
I don't have any opinion on how other people wear their hair or their clothes, or lack thereof. I think celebrity is only dangerous when people are looking for someone to think for them. That certainly doesn't include us.
I too am a Beatles fan have many of their albums in vinyl dating back to the 70s, play them on a turntable from the 1980s :-)
"I don't think you were fooled."
While doing the research, I asked my biker mate who never visited the US, "if you are flying to the US, what image of the US, would you have in your head?" He replied, the statue of liberty.
For me it was the image of 2 bikers on the open road from the Easy Rider movie. For a biker this signifies ultimate freedom. Thus the image of US as the land of freedom was implanted in my head, without my being aware of it. It didn't take me long to realize that there was absolutely no freedoms in the US. So when I bought a Soviet book "Role of Multinational Corporations in Instigating Regional Wars" and brought it with me to the US, I instinctively used to hide it under my mattress. The book disappeared and reappeared... which scared me shitless.. I realized they were entering my apartment in my absence and could easily have planted drugs. So I had to escape. I contacted my alma mater and told them I will be joining them as assistant professor, and gave notice to my company. In the meantime, I told all my friends and acquaintances at work and at Georgia Tech, that my dream was driving from coast to coast... I figured they'd wanna know where I stop and who I know, etc.... last Friday at work, went to Atlanta, partied with my friends... Sunday they drove me to the airport.. bought a ticket and left the land of the free lol
5 months after I returned home, I was contacted by my PhD advisor who had earlier told me: "We don't give a PhD for someone who will leave the country"... he got me 3 jobs and I chose 1. Anyhow.. he told me to come over to work on a NASA project for summer which I did... and then he offered me a faculty position which I turned down, and since have never been back. Not even to my daughter's BS & MS graduations
So... did they fool me? they sure did. So did they fool hundreds of millions all over the globe, including in Eastern European countries and the USSR? Yep they sure did.
Today do they fool Iranians? Yes, tens of millions of Iranians believe in the freedom and liberties in the US and the West and look forward to normalizing relations with the Empire. Actually this was my motivation for undertaking the research into mass psychology manipulation, to enlighten people in the Levant and Iran. Unfortunately not one subscriber from Iran lol.
Following are 3 superb studies by Joshua Stylman on mass psychology:
Engineering Reality: Physical & Psychological Mechanisms of Control
I must admit that I have mixed feelings about Russell Brand. On the negative side of the ledger. I keep getting interrupted on ‘free speech’ [sic] Rumble with Brand promoting 1775 Coffee with reference to either his bowel motions or his phantom pregnancy – and I am uncomfortable with his fellow 1775 coffee promoters … Donald Trump Jr, Steven Crowder et al.
Yes, the commercialization was what made me stop listening, before the sextroversy. When that happened and was so obviously a sham, I subbed him on Rumble in solidarity. But something happened after that, I feel. The sex charges were just the opening volley, the rest was in secret, I think. What's the world coming to when poor little millionaires and President's sons are hucksters for coffee?
No one, I think, respects me more than you do, Julius. You know I wouldn't fall for Russell as a celebrity, a guru or a sexy Pied Piper. Doesn't that make you curious as to why I would listen to him?
As someone in their seventies I can also attest to being there in the 60s in and around London and endorse everything Frances Leader says. These 50 year old kids know diddly squat about the music scene of the 60s (indeed arts scene with its street dance and street theatre etc) and there was nothing, and has never been anything, like it. Punk was a pretty good imitation I guess, dunno, I'd moved on by then. But to suggest that this was all created by Tavistock etc is actually naive beyond belief and suggests to me that some of these writers are 'distractor actors' if not downright Chaos Agents (I see you Mathew Crawford.) They always masquerade as your friend and play your favourite tunes. It's always concerned me that MC often labels as a cult any group he doesn't fully really agree with (I know he had his issues in a cult for which he has my sympathies.) Still don't get what his beef with Blavatsky, Besant and Theosophuy s - as I think I posted on another of your pieces Tereza:: Krishnamurti.
Well said, Tommy. I'm just a little bit behind you but there was an idealism of the time that's been replaced by cynicism. I think that's intentional.
'Distractor actors' --great phrase. I've been planning an episode on LARPwars & Conspiristatic. That's what I think the Blavatsky stuff is with Mathew. He puts so much noise into the system, to jam the recognition of the signal. While he's distracting everyone with the theosophy rant, he's accepting world war history at face value. Julius has a lot of exchanges with him and Matt Ehret in which they both ignore the facts that don't fit their narrative. For an ordinary person that would be excusable, but not someone who bills themselves as a historian.
I don't think Mathew ever got out of that cult. He has my sympathies but not my gullibility for the job he's doing for them still.
I like the backdrop of you in your childhood home, rummaging through the past - items and memories - weaving the narrative of today. We see what we see when we see it. And we tell a new version of the story when we do. The many stepping stones we traveled to get where we are, each had their own necessity and offered something essential and yet each are eclipsed as we take the next step.
When we no longer need to be 'right' then we are free to explore. How do we learn discernment otherwise? Let alone compassion?
Awakening wonders, all of us. There is no single path fortunately. We benefit by listening to each other's journey. RB has a story - some of which we can see, some is hidden. Greeting his audience as he does ' Hello, you 7M awakening wonders - is an acknowledgment and a framing that invites us to see ourselves in a positive light. If an element to it has an eye towards lulling us into a 'steered' view, we'll discover that too. I think in his case - could be wrong - he's doing his best to break the spells, with some constraints imposed along the way. Which could be said for all of us.
I love the way you put that, Kathleen: "he's doing his best to break the spells, with some constraints imposed along the way. Which could be said for all of us."
His greeting always made me feel good about myself and also bonded to everyone else who was listening. In this one, I say, "I suggest that our utopia-planning committee fall madly in love with each other and rigorously challenge ideas while adoring the person--something for which Russell's viewers are perfect." https://youtu.be/BTxuuSnRrZI
I think that 'do I endorse Russell' is as much the wrong question as 'do I condemn Russell.'
What someone like Mathew Crawford does is attack the character and discernment of the 7M who listened consistently enough to what Russell said that they subbed his YT channel. Mathew, from his statements, has listened to nothing Russell has ever said, other than a joke that proves Mathew doesn't understand the basic concept of humor. Mathew takes 'I raped a woman once' at face value but then thinks 'I killed her after' is probably not true, without ever connecting the two as therefore both false.
Of the thousands of hours of other things the extremely verbose Russell has said, Mathew has heard nada--and prides himself on that as a person of high character and superior judgment. With your respect for me and for Mary, I think you give us the benefit of the doubt that there may be something you're missing in why we gave our attention to Russell. You would be 'Brand-agnostic' unless you chose to listen to his old Luminary interviews and found reasons to suspect he was serving an ulterior agenda back then. And I would not dismiss that as a possibility.
I’m not sure what Mathew’s agenda is. He doesn’t seem to understand that as a fan of Russell, we can agree with most of what he says but still think for ourselves. I don’t have to agree with everything someone says or does to be able to extract some valuable information.
Exactly, Anneke! I think that Mathew's use of the terms 'follower' or 'believer' are demeaning. I've never been a follower of anyone. It assumes that women can't think for themselves, and I do think that women are his target.
I'm most definitely 'Brand-agnostic', although I have had my moments where I've been sure he was CO! It's concerning that now he is being targeted. Agreed, it's not a good argument to say that people who listen to [person X] are all dummies themselves.
I enjoyed this video, Tereza, and can relate to your experiences during Covid. I also liked the title,
7 Million Awakening Wonders. "THEY" better Watch Out! I thought of you when I heard about the allegations against Russell Brand. Always what they do when they want to silence someone who's speaking truth to power. Sorry for this to happen to him.
Oh what a kind response, Ronnie! It's refreshing to hear you, of all people, see Russell for who he is now, without the baggage of the past. On his behalf and Mary's and mine, thank you for that!
Well, let me say that I don't follow him, but my 2 sons and my husband listen to him and like him. So there is that. What I have heard him say, which is not too much, I have no problem with.
The thing with me is that I can't keep up with all the writers, pod-casters, and issues that many others follow, so I don't always know what's up, and I think that's a better place for me to be. Be seeing you.
Even better! Much of the critique (especially from Crawford) is that it's just women looking for a sexy guru who fall for Russell. So I'm happy that the discerning men in your life also like him!
hola, tereza. here's my comment from youtube copied here:
hola, tereza.
i really was touched beautifully by the arc of this share, from childhood preciousness to adult set back temporarily to woman with having managed to turn experience and difficulty into wisdom.
funny, i didn't come to you via youtube, rather via substack. i was late to the youtube game, having basically turned it and all media off in 2016 until the convid wake up jab or job mandate.
did you find the one eyed bear? what was up stairs in the scary attic?
trust yourself - yes. guatama's last words on his death bed to ananda. not the dhamma or the sangha. trust yourself.
funny, i enjoyed brand, did not ever become a 'follower' and found some of his ideas engaging and others not so much. we've exchanged words around that at the time you questioned his integrity and the integrity of those questioning his integrity.
we are living the bhagavad-gita wedded to the great apocalypse! all the best with what is changing. everything changes! with peace, respect, love and equanimous enthusiasm.
I used to love listening to Russell Brand. He's so very charming and engaging. One cannot help but like him. However I didn't think he would have anything of value to offer once I heard he was married to a Rothschild. There are not many who are not controlled by money or the cabal. Frances Leader is another one. I followed her work, I thought she did good research but on an occasion we came to a disagreement and she blocked me. That was years ago and still I am blocked. When people complain about bloodlines and not having our freedom and they go blocking anyone, let alone those who are putting up perfectly rational arguments, then they're not going to be of much value either. Because we know now about how terribly hoodwinked we've been and manipulated, but if we keep repeating the same song, we're going keep getting discord.
Hi, Denise. Julius sent me this meme awhile ago: https://imgur.com/WJMdEb4. It goes through five steps to get from Jacob Rothschild to his granddaughter Alice to her husband Zac (whose dad was Rothschild's business partner) to his sister Jemima who Russell once dated. He looks young in the photo on the meme. He's only had two wives--Katy Perry and his current wife. If she was a Rothschild, it doesn't seem like memes like this would be needed--they could cut to the chase. Do you have the genealogy on that?
No I don't have the geneology but I believe Katy Perry is a Rothschild. I listen to many people but someone like Russell with his massive following should be doing something to create a parallel system since we all criticize it so much. Lots of people talk but don't suggest anything. The main thing that's needed is collaborating with each other. That rarely happens but I feel it is imperative because as lonestars we cannot achieve anything. I did enjoy listening to him though but have moved on.
If Katy Perry was a Rothschild, the Russell-haters would be all over it. What she is, I believe, is an Illuminati monarch, trained to entrap. I suspect they were intended to be the queen and king of that Underworld. But he divorced her with a text message on New Year's Eve and left Hollywood, quitting his career and leaving the $22M he was entitled to in the divorce on the table.
If he wanted to be in that world, why would he do that? He was at the top of his game, a celebrity actor with international fame. He was promoted by the biggest names in Hollywood. That was in 2011. Were they setting him up for the CovidCon nine years early, getting married and having kids just as a cover?
How do you know he's not doing anything to create a parallel system? How much have you listened to him? He is always looking at how to decentralize into 10,000 villages, as he told Yuval Harari. He challenged Candace Owens that they should design a new social system right then and there. Here's my description of the YT where I talk about it:
Russell Brand has a vigorous debate with Candace Owens where they jest, they joust, they hold hands and they redesign the system on a yellow pad. Russell's next interview, Kehinde Andrews, calls Candace contradictory, wrapped around a bubble, an empty void, like talking down a hole, belongs on a plantation, crazy ideas, dangerous nonsense, irrational, ridiculously delusional, and a black face on white racism. Who's right? I present their positions and solutions, and then show how we could enable Kehindeville, Russelltopia and Candaceland, along with my own system of community reciprocity. https://youtu.be/fDWVGdExV-A
It's also why he said that he should read my book. I agree with you that lonestars can't achieve anything. Which is why I'm suspicious that every alternative voice with a following has been discredited. How can we collaborate when all it takes is unsubstantiated rumors to ruin someone's reputation?
Way back in the 90s I watched Alex Jones on videos from an underground video store. He helped me open my mind and I'm grateful for that even though it turns out he's a sold-out shill.
I moved on years ago because as my mind became attuned to liars, overt ones or ones who lie by omission or twisting the truth, I saw Alex Jones for who he is. Simultaneously, my mind also became more attuned to discerning the truth. Even if I didn't like the truth, I couldn't deny it.
The same is true for Russell Brand. He is the same as Alex Jones and the rest, only a variety of flavor. Brand is a shill. It's been proven many times and if that challenges people, then maybe they need the challenge.
What I find interesting is how many other people found their first taste of "the world is not what it seems" while watching people like Jones and Brand who are not what they seem.
That seems to be their purpose in the larger view. They are training wheels.
Defend the people who have been woken by the likes of Brand but encourage them to grow beyond him. More and larger Truths await.
Take off the training wheels and learn what it really means to ride.
You and I have agreed on many things, Pirate. And I agree with you about Alex Jones and can give you my reasons why. But you don't give reasons when you say, "Brand is a shill. It's been proven many times and if that challenges people, then maybe they need the challenge." Without going back to Hollywood Russell or forward to born-again Russell, cite your proof that he was a shill during the years from 2012-2024.
What you're telling me and Mary and Amy and Gan and Maria and JoE and Lyndsey is that we're just toddlers on training wheels, while you are a discerning person who's learned how to really ride into more and larger Truths. I don't accept that assessment of myself, much less of them.
I challenge you to back that up. Read my comment to Sue in which I cite my argument to Ahmad. Tell me, using facts and logic, where I'm wrong. Russell wasn't anywhere near my 'first taste of the world is not what it seems.' By the time I started listening to him, I'd already written a book exposing 28 of those psyops.
My rule is that I only watch, listen, or read what can teach me something new. I listened to over 100 hrs of Russell because I kept learning new perspectives, information and even words. I miss the old Russell, who had 2-3 hr long conversations about ideas in all the topics that interest me. I haven't found anyone to replace him. But I won't watch commercials for anybody, so I'd stopped watching his YT channel and just listened to his podcast.
The point of this article was that people like Mathew are browbeating me into disavowing Russell without taking the time to actually engage point by point. I'm still waiting for anyone to quote him, the way I've done for everyone I've exposed. Where did I fall for something he said? Saying that 7M of us are toddlers using training wheels isn't 'defending' them. I wouldn't stand by if someone said the same about you.
I never said you are a toddler using training wheels. Those are your words and are a misinterpretation. Read what I wrote again if you want to understand.
As for going point by point about Russell Brand, I'm not a video library. I've watched many hours of his programs over the years and many hours of other people breaking down what he's doing and who he's beholden to. Though I saw much about him that I began to distrust prior to realizing others were seeing the same misleading things from him as well. Where he was leading people onto dark paths via the deceptions of the "false light". Primarily through his promotion of "new age" doctrine which is taken directly from Alice Bailey, The Lucis Trust and the UN and their agendas. All of which are thinly and not so thinly disguised Luciferianism also known as Satanic doctrine from the teachings of Aleister Crowley.
I don't have time to prove it all to you when there is plenty of evidence available to you that you can easily find for yourself.
I never said Brand has nothing to teach people. It's what he teaches that is problematic to me.
I'm glad you responded, Pirate. I hesitated a long time before hitting send, knowing I could be driving away one of my favorite commenters.
My policy is 'love the person, challenge the ideas.' Love, by my definition, is taking the time to understand someone from their own pov. For 7M of us, we love Russell as evidenced by devoting our time to hear what he had to say. It's not a sexual thing or a celebrity thing or a guru thing. My feeling about him is like Amy's, that I wish he was my little brother. I find his banter and quick mind and humor interesting.
Your position, as stated, is "Defend the people who have been woken by the likes of Brand but encourage them to grow beyond him. More and larger Truths await. Take off the training wheels and learn what it really means to ride."
That demeans those who love Russell as being unable to think for themselves while they listen to him. With the other people I mentioned, none of them needed training wheels to know the world isn't what it seems. It makes us into 'followers' not independent minds.
Anyone who's looking for someone to 'believe' is deluded, by definition. They've chosen to make up their mind by 'believing' in advance of their own logic and experience, whether that's Russell, Mathew, Jesus or Buddha. I'm not looking for a 'leader' and I don't think anyone I know who loves Russell is either. Love isn't giving up your power to think. Rather than rejecting him, why not respect the 7M as being equal to yourself in discernment?
IMO, the rejection of 'new age' in favor of authoritarian religions or atheism, is another psyop. It specifically demeans feminine direct spirituality in favor of a hierarchy of religious 'leaders'. And it includes the exact same players who are looking to intimidate rather than debate the ideas. You may have seen this one of mine, but just in case: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/terry-wolfe-spits-on-spirit.
"Defend the people who have been woken by the likes of Brand but encourage them to grow beyond him. More and larger Truths await. Take off the training wheels and learn what it really means to ride."
This simply means keep growing and developing. If encouraging growth is demeaning to you so be it.
Russell Brand is not the repository of all knowledge and truth.
I stand by what I said. There are greater truths and experiences than what listening to Russell Brand can provide. I believe this.
It has been my experience that the more popular an individual becomes the more compromised by the influences of maintaining the benefits of that popularity bestowed by the world also becomes.
There is no free lunch. And Russell Brand is beholden to those who have enabled him to become as popular as he is.
I have no reason to respect popularity or see it as a measure by which I measure my own views. Perhaps you do.
I'm sure you understand what I'm saying. No one rises to multiple millions of fans or subscribers or followers or whatever name is comfortable without the approval of those who control the algorithms that dictate the platforms.
If you don't understand what new age religion is, I encourage you to investigate further. It is not a psyop. It is an ancient religion that seeks to oppose God. Simply put.
I said what I think and I'm sorry that's offensive to you. It wasn't intended to be, so I suppose you have taken this offense on yourself, but I do wish you'd stop dissecting my character.
It's a passive aggressive form of ad hominem attack and I'm finished going through this now.
I love the training wheels analogy but I also can see how Tereza could take offense…
Both Alex Jones and Russell present entertaining and thought provoking ways to look at the world. I see them as making the rabbit holes more inviting for the newbies. I think that’s what you mean by training wheels and I agree.
I thought Russell had some interesting things to say about Covid but overall he wasn’t my cup of tea. I haven’t listened to the same 100 hours of him that Tereza has. Perhaps Russell does have a lot more valuable info to share that I am unaware of.
Maybe I fell for the smear campaign or maybe Russell is a shill. Either way I don’t care. If he did help 7million people become more awakened then his overall impact may have been positive.
I appreciate you being a bridge between Pirate and myself, Anneke, in case the communication jumped off that bridge midway without either of us intending that.
I feel that, for me, Russell certainly didn't tell me anything I didn't already know regarding the CovidCon. I would say the same is true for Mary or Maria in Australia or JoE in Utah or Gan in Maine or Lyndsey in Scotland. All of the people who've connected to me, who also listened to Russell, certainly knew more than he ever said publicly. Was that by design, so he wouldn't lose his platform? I'd guess so. But none of these people needed 'training wheels.' They were all moving forward at lightning speed on the revelations.
What Russell provided was a forum, among ourselves, for people who were saying what he couldn't. What I resonated with wasn't his content but his style--he listens. He responds. He sparks off of what someone else is saying, he doesn't impose his agenda. He genuinely LIKES people of all sorts. I still find that unparalleled with any other interviewer.
What I'm offended by is those who position his listeners as 'followers' or 'believers'. It says more about us than it does about him. I want evidence that I'm a gullible and easily swayed person who's taken in by smooth talkers. I think my body of work says otherwise. And if I'm not, then the time I've spent listening makes me more of an authority on Russell than someone of equal discernment who hasn't put in the time.
That’s a really interesting way to look at Russell’s channel - as a forum to connect with others. Also to admire Russell’s interviewing style is another great angle to look at him. If I were to watch him with that attitude I might appreciate him more.
You are certainly NOT gullible or easily swayed. Your work on Hitler and Churchill showed this to me!
I also think of you as a better authority on Russell than Mathew or I am since you have listened to him far more than either of us have.
And just worth noting that listener/follower/believer are not synonymous with being gullible. Mathew is not realizing that he could be the gullible one by swallowing the Russell smear campaign.
finished this video while glancing at your book that i cant wait to dig in =) Loved how you precised defeding the 7 millions wonders instead of the sheperd of them. You know i still have the same opinion on Russel brand, and its quite the same for tucker, peterson, mariannaspring, carolyn jarvis, joe rogan, icks and alex jones, the ald-tabatai of this world and all the gatekeepers who works well to do the pied piper song.
I do agree that good speach said from bad mouth is still good speach if we dont associate with the mouth that speaks them. We both already know where we dont agree and i do know you dont like when i say: we agree to disagree hehe. So i hope my revised version of the impact of russel and your revised version of the 7 wonders will maybe agree to agree.
Anyway, we should all be our own sheperd. Take from someone what is good and leave what is bad (metaphoricly speaking and related to teachings) the same sentence would be quite a sentence (consequence) if it was taken from a phisical point of view instead of spiritual one. LOL
If not, well i still appreciate you a LOT for all you have done yet and will still be doing in the futur. its a great plus for our community and i'll thank you 7 million times! hehe
ps: when pointing at end of your video, you probly showned you tube links but on substack your pointing thin air =P that was amusing. and now i'll go subscribe to your youtube. thanks
I love Russell without any reservations or apologies to the Johney-come-Lately's, like Matthew Crawford and in spite of the validations and approval of newly awakened like Tucker or Petersen.
I offer unsolicited advice: beware of the podcast circle jerkers, those who interview the interviewers and the few people they want to promote amongst their "approved thoughts" clique. The repetition of what is being said from channel to channel and platform to platform challenges the CIA's Mockingbird program for The Most Insidious Cancer to Society Award. Not one of them would dare ask a "regular person" what they think and how they came to that conclusion. Not one of the are capable of believing someone - like Russell - could possibly change their life by the grace of God. Too bad for them, that leave them with little hope for themselves of changing.
Rant over.
Amy you are a joy, true to your name. 'Without reservations or apologies'--I'm going to use that line. And 'in spite of the validations and approval of newly awakened like Tucker or Petersen'--excellent! Your unsolicited advice speaks exactly to my suspicion. With the condemnation of anyone with an audience, they get to more and more refined until it's finally only me and thee who are worthy.
For the full argument, this is what I sent to Ahmad in response to Mathew's question, 'Do you trust her? She listens to RB':
Step One in Have a Better Argument: define the question. We both agree that Russell was an important asset to the Illuminati up to and through his 14-mo. marriage to Katy Perry. We both agree that Russell’s role since the sextroversy is to control the opposition to get Trump elected. Same as Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, Malone, RFK, Kirsch, etc. Mission accomplished.
So the question is “Was Russell Brand representing his own views during the interim from 2012 to Sept 2023, when he went back to college in comparative religion and geopolitics, wrote some biographies, got married and had kids, and started a podcast?”
Step Two: Why does it matter? If you are a person who decides whether ideas are right or wrong based on whether a person is good or bad, it matters. If you decide ideas based on facts and logic, it does not. However, deciding that someone IS being controlled helps to figure out what the larger agenda is—like getting Trump elected, unless you have a different theory about the direction that Russell is leading the opposition in.
If you see how Russell has influenced my channel and work, please elaborate because I don’t agree. I had two decades of writing to back those points of agreement before I’d ever heard Russell. Because he was asking the same questions—What is ultimate reality? How do we restructure society—although not coming as consistently to the answers, he gave me a way of presenting my ideas in response to his and reaching a handful of people who’d been drawn to his engagement with those questions.
Like Bitcoin and spirituality, Mathew doesn’t address my points on Russell but states that, as women are wont to do, I am thinking with my vagina. Everyone knows that women are incapable of reason around a sexy guy, unlike men who retain their discernment around beautiful women—which is why they don’t bother to use them in advertising.
If someone insulted Kat [Amhad's wife], I don’t think when she tried to tell her side, you’d say ‘I’m just tired of all the bickering and infighting and want to remain outside of all that.’ Mathew isn’t presenting facts and logic about Russell Brand, he’s calling me and all women gullible and unable to think. He uses the same trick as the Bible, telling men they’re superior to all those hot babes in yoga pants because every guy intuitively knows rapiness is associated with male owners of yoga studios. Right?
By the same token that the Illuminati don’t let people walk out, do trauma-based mind control cults that turned his brother into a charming psychopath who’s probably killed people? I don’t see controlled opposition in people because I disagree with them. I see it when they use insults, ridicule, backstabbing, intimidation and rhetorical tricks to discredit others instead of answering their arguments.
If you’re asking me about Russell because I’m a serious researcher and you want an answer to the question above using the 100+ hours I’ve spent analyzing his conversations, you’ve come to the right place. But as I said in the video, if your question is “Can I trust Russell to think for me?” My answer is no, no matter how good a person he is. And if Mathew’s question is whether you should trust me to think for you, the answer’s always no.
For Russell, as someone whose comedic personae was based on sexual licentiousness, it’s not a scandal to be told he’s sexually licentious. And then there’s Mathew saying “Russell Brand jokes about rape.” I know I don’t need to explain to you how humor works but, as we both know, Mathew doesn’t get it. When Russell says, “I raped a woman once,” he’s created tension. You’re going, OMG, is this a confession? It makes you uncomfortable. And then when he says, “I killed her after,” you laugh because he’s played you. He got you going and pulled the rug out from under you because of that moment when you thought he might be serious. That’s the formula. Jokes 101.
But let’s examine Russell’s trajectory. In 2009 he starts speaking out about Palestine—the Kavernacle video in my Illuminati article has clips. In 2009 he and Katy Perry get together. Coincidence or damage control? He’s at the top of the Illuminati food chain—king and queen of the underworld. Yet he leaves. He was due half of the $44M she earned during the 14 mos. they were together but he doesn’t touch it. Instead he ends up doing luggage ads on his podcast, where he makes a pittance. Suddenly, due to Covid, he skyrockets to 7M subs. Why wouldn’t the Illuminati want him to stay with that? He controlled more of the opposition than anyone else.
If they wanted to give him opposition street cred (which he already had) they would have demonetized him for disinformation. The sex scandal turned off people in the opposition. It wasn’t Covid or the vaccines the PTB were threatened by—that’s four psyops ago—it was his stance on Israel. Anyone can talk about the banks, it’s talking specifically about who’s behind the banks that’s taboo. And the current psyop is Israel, with Trump its front man. What celebrity do you know who’s speaking out and hasn’t been destroyed?
Whew! Glad to use this somewhere. Thanks for the opportunity, Amy, although your statement is much simpler!
Glad to be of service. I haven't followed your dispute with Mathew but when Substack first suggested I follow him I gave him a try. A couple of times. What I recall most about what I read was the feelings I had, kind of like music by a new artist. I felt like he thought himself the last authority on everything and that if I, the reader, didn't recognize that then I must be a "mind-controlled dumbass."
And seriously, if most of us "regular people" do not have suspicions about many of the accounts that have cropped up since we entered (myself, Oct. 2020, I think) than we are not as alternative media source minded as we fancy ourselves.
The covid-crazy times funneled us to this platform somehow, I sure don't remember how I landed here but I do remember being on pages as a "free subscriber" and dialoging as you and I are now, with people that now have so many followers they no longer can reply, like Midwest Doctor and others who "touch" RFK Jr. I find that rather bazaar.
I remember being attuned to the workings of "The International Dark Web" back when Obamalamadingdong was still president and before Dave Rubin bought his baby and Bret Weinstein was chased out of Evergreen and I continue to be befuddled everyday where everyone and all that tripped and landed. But the fact that they were hardened liberals (Young Turk!) and now are held up as vanguards of the new newthink - along with the litany to be found on all the Non-Compliance to Covid Protocols Records helps me to remember that most likely my algorithms are being managed by darker webmasters operating underground in Turin using more energy than Ford MoCo, GMAC and the Rouge Steele plant combined ever needed to control a silly woman of middling age - too old to fantasize about Russell, who I wish was my little brother.
They flatter us by believing we need to be controlled. They feed off us. They need us. Everyone is controlled by something/one, could even be their own ego. We all have things we don't want to be found out, I know I do. I miss the in-person handshake and "how do you do?" that comes before this level of intimacy. Wish you were here.
You are so funny, Amy. I wish you were here too. I've been getting a little more of that in my life, meeting with Mary in realtime--even dancing! And our monthly zoom calls with the Apocaloptimist Club, it gets a step closer to blurring the lines.
Funny also that you mention AMD. I have this one on him/ her: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-psyop-cyclops. I'm just noticing that the YT was removed. When did that happen? I guess these strikes start to run together after awhile. Who can keep track?
And I did a YT on Bret Weinstein that I was just thinking to re-release and put on Substack. I watched it again for my RB article and thought it made some good points. Here it is: https://youtu.be/9UlgpFoaIJc?si=kth70aCMK2FshD7n.
I'm glad you came my way, Amy Joy.
"Everyone is controlled by something/one, could even be their own ego. We all have things we don't want to be found out.."
Isn't that the truth!
Also, I love that you wish Russell was your little brother. My feeling exactly! One of my friends said his wife thought Russell and I were beginning to look alike, like I was his older sister. I think that must have been an ideological twinship, since I don't see it but I love the concept!
I am happy to see that the covid struggle still beats in some hearts. In fact most people dont want to remember, but I feel it hasnt really gone away. I can not overcome a feeling of defeat and powerlessness about it. The nursing houses massacres have not been i
punished, the perpetrators have got away with it. Its painful, like Gaza. This feeling of being living in the empire of evil. Even today, I receives news about Rainer Fullmich, who is still in prison, and Dr. Bailey, who has been deprived of her doctor licence this week, in New Zeeland. We keep losing. Sunday, I met this woke acquintance who is a leader of the local Extinction Resistance group, a British climatist NGO. She said she was sorry for Gaza and then mentioned Noam Chomsky, who I disapproved for his role in Covid. Then I recived a storm of propaganda about the vaccines, the confinement, the massification in the hospitals... She didnt allow me to speak and if I tried to say something, she wouldnt stop talking. I could feel how a pure ire was growing in me. It was getting physical. I could hardly contain myself. We were in a social gathering and I didnt wanted to ruin the ambience..I had clashes with this dumb in the past and wanted to forget our old arguments. But I couldnt help feeling a deep disgust and hate for the neighboring accomplices of this abomination.
I agree, Yoni, I think it's important we don't forget the CovidCon, even though it's four psyops ago. And yes, the defeats keep coming, with Gaza, with Rainer, with Sam.
There was a time that I was fooled by the Noam, I think you've seen this one of mine since I came to my senses: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/noam-chomsky-is-the-problem. Don't waste your disgust and hate on them, Yoni. It will only hurt you and they'll be oblivious and self-righteous as ever. There are bigger things at play, I think, and the psyops are still coming.
I think most people just dont have a clue, so they desperately try to fit in the right narrative for social promotion purposes. It's like with crypto currencies and Bitcoin. Most people dont know code nor understand what the blockchain technology is. However, they make their bets and put their money in what they perceive to be the winning horses, just because the information perception bubble leads them to make choices. This lady for example, is obsessed with her children being geniuses. She would like to have them studying in a top tier University, but she doesnt have the financial means to do so. So she searches social promotion through civil NGO's, parroting the official messages. Not everybody has money, but everybody has an opinion, right? It is a way of feeling protected too. And after all, what could she do against the allmighty powers that be? I think this is the way liberals and lefties are actually controlled and utilized without them even knowing about it. Chomsky, Berney Sanders, AOC and alike are active actors for this. Little wonder she mentioned him as a referent.
I'm not sure what he's doing now with Trump and his religious re-awakening.
Neither of those is a particular problem to me, it just seems out of character, or that he has taken the path of "born-again" to allay his detractors. Maybe to become more mainstream, not sure.
Backing religious fundamentalism makes my eyebrow go up, especially someone who has been where he has, and seen what he has seen.
To each his own, I guess.
I liked when he was more on par with Jimmy Dore. I like a lot of what the new administration is doing, but there's a lot I don't like too. He doesn't seem to be critical of our Israel policy or "antisemitism witch hunts" that are all the rage with the Right.
When someone does that much of a change in direction, it makes me suspicious. It feels like he has lost his objectivity.
I agree. The time that I listened to him was after he left (I think ran away from) Hollywood and his marriage to Katy Perry and before the sextroversy, when I think he was captured again. I fully suspect he was an important asset to the Illuminati: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/russell-brand-and-the-illuminati.
He was taking a hard stand on Palestine back in 2009, when few were. Right after that is when they sicced Katy on him as his monarch, I think. Those two things seem related.
When he started his Luminary podcast, he'd gone back to college in geopolitics and spirituality. The second video I linked was with his favorite professor, Brad Evans, who had a hard-hitting specialty--torture or systems of enslavement, something like that. Russell was almost a nobody, interviewing a few old friends but mostly nobodies.
His interview with Jimmy Dore was my first introduction to Jimmy, and I really liked the resonance between them. Russell got in a lot of trouble once for saying people shouldn't vote. So he and Jimmy had a common perspective on the left/ right divide.
I had stopped listening before the sextroversy, because of the excessive commercialization and the return of his celebrity, which made his show more slick. But there's no doubt the charges were fabricated, as I say here: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/russell-branded.
The conversion and shilling for Trump, along with his connection to the whole 'swarm' feels forced. I don't think he lost his objectivity. I think the option to express it was taken from him. We are 'one nation under blackmail' and I'm certain they have that on him.
Not sure what more they can get him on that they haven't already.
Seemed he weathered the last one pretty well, but you're right, it must be something.
I think he is still demonetized on YT - I just look at his headlines on Rumble but don't watch generally because he's always a day or two late for me, and I've already heard everything i need on the subject lol.
But he's been a pretty good belweather up until the last 6 months and I've just been kind of baffled with him lately.
Kind of like Jon Stewart, but at least he didn't pin a medal on a nazi.
If I were a dynastic patriarch bent on global domination, I'd get the people I wanted to control onto private boats or planes--at which point, I own them. I'd go through the motions of supplying drinks and drugs but what I'd really do is rufie them or something that takes away all inhibitions and memory. All consciousness but leaves the motor impulses intact. Then I'd have little girls groomed to sexually incriminate. I'd have 'satanic' rituals like Anneke Lucas describes, in which children are killed by other children. Of course, their participation would be on camera.
I think Russell was given some leash, but then they yanked it.
Seems to be the scheme.
I read a great paper a while ago that talked about the Glafia, or global mafia.
All the people we see are just the chess pieces. I've been watching and EU about to go tits up. How far behind do you think the U.S. is?
Not far, I reckon - they're already fleecing it like a private equity firm.
That's why the rats are abandoning ship as fast as they can.
And that's why I have my plan B which is the Shift which is going to circumvent all this old school nonsense.
Where we will not be affected by other's belief systems. Playing a game in god-mode where we fly over the radar.
That or bust haha
Oh was the Glafia from my friend Mees Baaijen? We're working on a collaboration in the lead-up to May 9th. It was his idea and my name for WW2ruth Liberation Day.
It may have been - it was quite a white paper and made perfect sense to me. I couldn't remember where I got to it. Probably was through you lol
link to it if you have it please!
The pattern seems to be pretty clear:
a: destabilize a region through war creating a mass migration
b: use said migration to destabilize a desired country causing the economy to fail
c: buy up land and resources and assume power for pennies on the dollar
Crude and simple, but I believe that's the crux of it. And it spans countries - this is worldwide and local politicians just get bought off like trump with Israel. They're just a means to an end.
Oh and by the way, Blackrock just bought the ports on both sides of the panama canal - how convenient.
As an example
Thanks for referencing my article about the attack on Boomer memories! I appreciate you for that.
In respect of Russell Brand, I am sure you remember me telling you that his reputation here in the UK is very mixed. Real Essex blokes don't behave like him and they don't marry up-town girls to curry favour with the predator class for career advancement. I have seldom listened to him because he let our menfolk down with his drugs/sex/self obsessed persona.
He grates Essex nerves!
He is known for posing as a Pied Piper character who made hedonism attractive for a young audience. This went down like a stone with me. Later he seemed to be posing as a reborn Christian, even imitating the standard Jesus appearance. That also hit me as phoney.
I don't know or care what he is doing now. Sucking up to Trump? Yeah... about that! 🙄
I agree with you about Russell’s character. He did, however, have some really good things to say during Covid. If he helped awaken some people and helped others feel less alone during Covid then I see his impact as an overall wash.
hi dear Tereza.
Guess what? I just got your book! we can thank Malik for that =) Funny thing, last book i bought was of James True and had 22 chapter, now yours i saw got 21 but i consider the outro as one too so i'll stick with my 22. And thats my fate guiding number so guess how i was PLEASED when it arrived this morning! i'm starting the reading tonight and i'll be taking note. Now i'll have the best view on this caret system of yours and it may take a while. so i wish also to congratulate you on such a big book! lots of information, lots of development (ok i admit since this morning i cheated a little and went ahead peek on many chapters, ending and lexicon) Would have love more words into the lexicon because i am SURE you know of others like these that could be really revealing. pfffff nevermind! your awesome! just saw there is lexicon for every chapter ;)
A big thanks to you and all who helped you wrote it and inspired you.
In the beginning was the purpose... of your book
And in the end... There is me really happy to read you from elsewhere then a computer ;)
What a lovely response to my book, Jean-Sebastien! I like the fate guiding number and I'm going with the 22--or 24 if we count the preface and the prologue. I'm a dozenals gal ;-) It feels very nice to be read by you and I'm so looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Agree about Russel, disagree about Beatles.
1. First and foremost it is important to always keep in mind that "Celebrities" are created by controllers of mass media platforms.
Quoting Daniel J. Boorstin, "The Image, A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America", 1961:
"Our age has produced a new kind of eminence: the celebrity. His qualities—or rather his lack of qualities—illustrate our peculiar problems. He has been fabricated on purpose to satisfy our exaggerated expectations of human greatness.
1901 - 1914, 74% celebrities came from politics, business, and the professions.
After 1922 over 50% came from the world of entertainment.
1960 nearly all come from the fields of light entertainment, sports, and the night club circuit.
The hero created himself; the celebrity is created by the media."
True there were a lot of talented musicians and bands, but making it to celebrity status is only possible if the controllers of mass media platforms want it.
2. On long hair: From "A Hairy Story" https://www.beatlesagain.com/a-hairy-beatles-story.html
"However, it caused a sensation when the Beatles arrived in America in 1964. The affectionate term 'Moptops' was created and almost every comedian in the country cracked gags about their hair style. Hundreds of thousands of Beatles wigs were manufactured and it eventually led to the American youth growing their hair longer than had been previously acceptable for a young male."
3. The Beatles as all bands elevated by mass media controllers to celebrity status, were for an objective. The bands themselves may or not be aware that they are being used.
In the US and the West the objective was as explained in Mass Psychology in Geopolitics 6 of 9 https://fadilama.substack.com/p/mass-psychology-in-geopolitics-6
Globally the objective from same reference:
"Besides reformatting a rebellious youth via mass psychology manipulation, this “revolution” would impact youth globally and most importantly provide a perception that the level of freedom existing in the US was not available elsewhere, thereby having the US perceived as the bastion of freedom."
Proof of the above is further provided in this article: How the Beatles Rocked the Kremlin
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna51867454
"As a generation of Soviet kids dared to sing along, they gave up on “building Socialism” and abandoned the beliefs of their parents. “The Cold War was won by the West,” says Troitsky, “not by nuclear missiles, but by the Beatles."
We had been fooled, not only by the Beatles but the whole music and movie scene in the 60s and 70s. The Counterculture counterrevolution was probably one of the greatest mass psychology operations ever.
When my book was published, I tracked for a while it's rating on Amazon, the best I got was on October 29, 2023:
Best Sellers Rank: #5,942 in Books
#1 in Asian Politics
#3 in Globalization and Politics
#15 in History & Theory of Politics.
I was curious to see what book was #1 overall. It was Britney Spears "The Woman in Me"
It had a cover pic, I sure couldn't compete with; half naked woman with arms covering her boobs.
https://www.amazon.com/Woman-Me-Britney-Spears/dp/1668009048
If books are for expanding one's knowledge, then I have absolutely no doubt that your book and mine have a thousand times more substance and value. But neither has a chance to become a "bestseller". That is reserved to manufactured celebrities :-)
Two people who are passionate diehard Beatles fans are James Corbett and Mark Elsis of earthnewspaper.com. It would be hard for me to imagine (pun intended) two more independent thinkers, who base their conclusions on fact and logic. Whether or not Tavistock promoted the Beatles, the Beatles spoke to something in them that didn't lead them into dissolute drug-addled living. The music continues to inspire both of them.
I don't think that the James Dean in you led you astray. It spoke to that restlessness that knew something was deeply wrong with the way things are. He tried to harness that energy into being a rebel without a cause, but you used it to find your cause and keep your idealism. I don't think you were fooled.
As you've seen by my responses to ICE-9, he's now riding the rebellion against the inclusive, free love rebellion and turning it into white superiority over blacks, who are degenerate by nature. And are you really quoting NBC?
I don't have any opinion on how other people wear their hair or their clothes, or lack thereof. I think celebrity is only dangerous when people are looking for someone to think for them. That certainly doesn't include us.
I too am a Beatles fan have many of their albums in vinyl dating back to the 70s, play them on a turntable from the 1980s :-)
"I don't think you were fooled."
While doing the research, I asked my biker mate who never visited the US, "if you are flying to the US, what image of the US, would you have in your head?" He replied, the statue of liberty.
For me it was the image of 2 bikers on the open road from the Easy Rider movie. For a biker this signifies ultimate freedom. Thus the image of US as the land of freedom was implanted in my head, without my being aware of it. It didn't take me long to realize that there was absolutely no freedoms in the US. So when I bought a Soviet book "Role of Multinational Corporations in Instigating Regional Wars" and brought it with me to the US, I instinctively used to hide it under my mattress. The book disappeared and reappeared... which scared me shitless.. I realized they were entering my apartment in my absence and could easily have planted drugs. So I had to escape. I contacted my alma mater and told them I will be joining them as assistant professor, and gave notice to my company. In the meantime, I told all my friends and acquaintances at work and at Georgia Tech, that my dream was driving from coast to coast... I figured they'd wanna know where I stop and who I know, etc.... last Friday at work, went to Atlanta, partied with my friends... Sunday they drove me to the airport.. bought a ticket and left the land of the free lol
5 months after I returned home, I was contacted by my PhD advisor who had earlier told me: "We don't give a PhD for someone who will leave the country"... he got me 3 jobs and I chose 1. Anyhow.. he told me to come over to work on a NASA project for summer which I did... and then he offered me a faculty position which I turned down, and since have never been back. Not even to my daughter's BS & MS graduations
So... did they fool me? they sure did. So did they fool hundreds of millions all over the globe, including in Eastern European countries and the USSR? Yep they sure did.
Today do they fool Iranians? Yes, tens of millions of Iranians believe in the freedom and liberties in the US and the West and look forward to normalizing relations with the Empire. Actually this was my motivation for undertaking the research into mass psychology manipulation, to enlighten people in the Levant and Iran. Unfortunately not one subscriber from Iran lol.
Following are 3 superb studies by Joshua Stylman on mass psychology:
Engineering Reality: Physical & Psychological Mechanisms of Control
https://stylman.substack.com/p/engineering-reality-part-i
Engineering Reality: Cultural Engineering (Beatles discussed here)
https://stylman.substack.com/p/engineering-reality-part-ii
Engineering Reality: Automation of Consciousness Control
https://stylman.substack.com/p/engineering-reality-part-iii
"celebrity is only dangerous when people are looking for someone to think for them"
and that represents..... 90%...99% more? :-)
"That certainly doesn't include us."
True... but what do we represent... 10%, 1% or less... I would guess less
ICE-9: It is quite common I guess for geniuses to be eccentric in some way or other.
For me, I pick the gems and disregard the other stuff
If I were with my biker gang I would have replied:
"Well nobody is perfect...... except me" lol lol lol laughing here :-)
I must admit that I have mixed feelings about Russell Brand. On the negative side of the ledger. I keep getting interrupted on ‘free speech’ [sic] Rumble with Brand promoting 1775 Coffee with reference to either his bowel motions or his phantom pregnancy – and I am uncomfortable with his fellow 1775 coffee promoters … Donald Trump Jr, Steven Crowder et al.
mmm … !!??
Yes, the commercialization was what made me stop listening, before the sextroversy. When that happened and was so obviously a sham, I subbed him on Rumble in solidarity. But something happened after that, I feel. The sex charges were just the opening volley, the rest was in secret, I think. What's the world coming to when poor little millionaires and President's sons are hucksters for coffee?
No one, I think, respects me more than you do, Julius. You know I wouldn't fall for Russell as a celebrity, a guru or a sexy Pied Piper. Doesn't that make you curious as to why I would listen to him?
As someone in their seventies I can also attest to being there in the 60s in and around London and endorse everything Frances Leader says. These 50 year old kids know diddly squat about the music scene of the 60s (indeed arts scene with its street dance and street theatre etc) and there was nothing, and has never been anything, like it. Punk was a pretty good imitation I guess, dunno, I'd moved on by then. But to suggest that this was all created by Tavistock etc is actually naive beyond belief and suggests to me that some of these writers are 'distractor actors' if not downright Chaos Agents (I see you Mathew Crawford.) They always masquerade as your friend and play your favourite tunes. It's always concerned me that MC often labels as a cult any group he doesn't fully really agree with (I know he had his issues in a cult for which he has my sympathies.) Still don't get what his beef with Blavatsky, Besant and Theosophuy s - as I think I posted on another of your pieces Tereza:: Krishnamurti.
Well said, Tommy. I'm just a little bit behind you but there was an idealism of the time that's been replaced by cynicism. I think that's intentional.
'Distractor actors' --great phrase. I've been planning an episode on LARPwars & Conspiristatic. That's what I think the Blavatsky stuff is with Mathew. He puts so much noise into the system, to jam the recognition of the signal. While he's distracting everyone with the theosophy rant, he's accepting world war history at face value. Julius has a lot of exchanges with him and Matt Ehret in which they both ignore the facts that don't fit their narrative. For an ordinary person that would be excusable, but not someone who bills themselves as a historian.
I don't think Mathew ever got out of that cult. He has my sympathies but not my gullibility for the job he's doing for them still.
I like the backdrop of you in your childhood home, rummaging through the past - items and memories - weaving the narrative of today. We see what we see when we see it. And we tell a new version of the story when we do. The many stepping stones we traveled to get where we are, each had their own necessity and offered something essential and yet each are eclipsed as we take the next step.
When we no longer need to be 'right' then we are free to explore. How do we learn discernment otherwise? Let alone compassion?
Awakening wonders, all of us. There is no single path fortunately. We benefit by listening to each other's journey. RB has a story - some of which we can see, some is hidden. Greeting his audience as he does ' Hello, you 7M awakening wonders - is an acknowledgment and a framing that invites us to see ourselves in a positive light. If an element to it has an eye towards lulling us into a 'steered' view, we'll discover that too. I think in his case - could be wrong - he's doing his best to break the spells, with some constraints imposed along the way. Which could be said for all of us.
Thanks Tereza.
I love the way you put that, Kathleen: "he's doing his best to break the spells, with some constraints imposed along the way. Which could be said for all of us."
His greeting always made me feel good about myself and also bonded to everyone else who was listening. In this one, I say, "I suggest that our utopia-planning committee fall madly in love with each other and rigorously challenge ideas while adoring the person--something for which Russell's viewers are perfect." https://youtu.be/BTxuuSnRrZI
I’m still not certain on Brand myself but I must say I always learn a bunch of stuff from the comments on your posts (yours included!)
I think that 'do I endorse Russell' is as much the wrong question as 'do I condemn Russell.'
What someone like Mathew Crawford does is attack the character and discernment of the 7M who listened consistently enough to what Russell said that they subbed his YT channel. Mathew, from his statements, has listened to nothing Russell has ever said, other than a joke that proves Mathew doesn't understand the basic concept of humor. Mathew takes 'I raped a woman once' at face value but then thinks 'I killed her after' is probably not true, without ever connecting the two as therefore both false.
Of the thousands of hours of other things the extremely verbose Russell has said, Mathew has heard nada--and prides himself on that as a person of high character and superior judgment. With your respect for me and for Mary, I think you give us the benefit of the doubt that there may be something you're missing in why we gave our attention to Russell. You would be 'Brand-agnostic' unless you chose to listen to his old Luminary interviews and found reasons to suspect he was serving an ulterior agenda back then. And I would not dismiss that as a possibility.
Thanks for reading and responding, Neshma!
I’m not sure what Mathew’s agenda is. He doesn’t seem to understand that as a fan of Russell, we can agree with most of what he says but still think for ourselves. I don’t have to agree with everything someone says or does to be able to extract some valuable information.
Exactly, Anneke! I think that Mathew's use of the terms 'follower' or 'believer' are demeaning. I've never been a follower of anyone. It assumes that women can't think for themselves, and I do think that women are his target.
I'm most definitely 'Brand-agnostic', although I have had my moments where I've been sure he was CO! It's concerning that now he is being targeted. Agreed, it's not a good argument to say that people who listen to [person X] are all dummies themselves.
I enjoyed this video, Tereza, and can relate to your experiences during Covid. I also liked the title,
7 Million Awakening Wonders. "THEY" better Watch Out! I thought of you when I heard about the allegations against Russell Brand. Always what they do when they want to silence someone who's speaking truth to power. Sorry for this to happen to him.
Oh what a kind response, Ronnie! It's refreshing to hear you, of all people, see Russell for who he is now, without the baggage of the past. On his behalf and Mary's and mine, thank you for that!
Well, let me say that I don't follow him, but my 2 sons and my husband listen to him and like him. So there is that. What I have heard him say, which is not too much, I have no problem with.
The thing with me is that I can't keep up with all the writers, pod-casters, and issues that many others follow, so I don't always know what's up, and I think that's a better place for me to be. Be seeing you.
Even better! Much of the critique (especially from Crawford) is that it's just women looking for a sexy guru who fall for Russell. So I'm happy that the discerning men in your life also like him!
hola, tereza. here's my comment from youtube copied here:
hola, tereza.
i really was touched beautifully by the arc of this share, from childhood preciousness to adult set back temporarily to woman with having managed to turn experience and difficulty into wisdom.
funny, i didn't come to you via youtube, rather via substack. i was late to the youtube game, having basically turned it and all media off in 2016 until the convid wake up jab or job mandate.
did you find the one eyed bear? what was up stairs in the scary attic?
trust yourself - yes. guatama's last words on his death bed to ananda. not the dhamma or the sangha. trust yourself.
funny, i enjoyed brand, did not ever become a 'follower' and found some of his ideas engaging and others not so much. we've exchanged words around that at the time you questioned his integrity and the integrity of those questioning his integrity.
we are living the bhagavad-gita wedded to the great apocalypse! all the best with what is changing. everything changes! with peace, respect, love and equanimous enthusiasm.
10:58 to 12:05.......
I used to love listening to Russell Brand. He's so very charming and engaging. One cannot help but like him. However I didn't think he would have anything of value to offer once I heard he was married to a Rothschild. There are not many who are not controlled by money or the cabal. Frances Leader is another one. I followed her work, I thought she did good research but on an occasion we came to a disagreement and she blocked me. That was years ago and still I am blocked. When people complain about bloodlines and not having our freedom and they go blocking anyone, let alone those who are putting up perfectly rational arguments, then they're not going to be of much value either. Because we know now about how terribly hoodwinked we've been and manipulated, but if we keep repeating the same song, we're going keep getting discord.
Hi, Denise. Julius sent me this meme awhile ago: https://imgur.com/WJMdEb4. It goes through five steps to get from Jacob Rothschild to his granddaughter Alice to her husband Zac (whose dad was Rothschild's business partner) to his sister Jemima who Russell once dated. He looks young in the photo on the meme. He's only had two wives--Katy Perry and his current wife. If she was a Rothschild, it doesn't seem like memes like this would be needed--they could cut to the chase. Do you have the genealogy on that?
No I don't have the geneology but I believe Katy Perry is a Rothschild. I listen to many people but someone like Russell with his massive following should be doing something to create a parallel system since we all criticize it so much. Lots of people talk but don't suggest anything. The main thing that's needed is collaborating with each other. That rarely happens but I feel it is imperative because as lonestars we cannot achieve anything. I did enjoy listening to him though but have moved on.
If Katy Perry was a Rothschild, the Russell-haters would be all over it. What she is, I believe, is an Illuminati monarch, trained to entrap. I suspect they were intended to be the queen and king of that Underworld. But he divorced her with a text message on New Year's Eve and left Hollywood, quitting his career and leaving the $22M he was entitled to in the divorce on the table.
If he wanted to be in that world, why would he do that? He was at the top of his game, a celebrity actor with international fame. He was promoted by the biggest names in Hollywood. That was in 2011. Were they setting him up for the CovidCon nine years early, getting married and having kids just as a cover?
How do you know he's not doing anything to create a parallel system? How much have you listened to him? He is always looking at how to decentralize into 10,000 villages, as he told Yuval Harari. He challenged Candace Owens that they should design a new social system right then and there. Here's my description of the YT where I talk about it:
Russell Brand has a vigorous debate with Candace Owens where they jest, they joust, they hold hands and they redesign the system on a yellow pad. Russell's next interview, Kehinde Andrews, calls Candace contradictory, wrapped around a bubble, an empty void, like talking down a hole, belongs on a plantation, crazy ideas, dangerous nonsense, irrational, ridiculously delusional, and a black face on white racism. Who's right? I present their positions and solutions, and then show how we could enable Kehindeville, Russelltopia and Candaceland, along with my own system of community reciprocity. https://youtu.be/fDWVGdExV-A
It's also why he said that he should read my book. I agree with you that lonestars can't achieve anything. Which is why I'm suspicious that every alternative voice with a following has been discredited. How can we collaborate when all it takes is unsubstantiated rumors to ruin someone's reputation?
Way back in the 90s I watched Alex Jones on videos from an underground video store. He helped me open my mind and I'm grateful for that even though it turns out he's a sold-out shill.
I moved on years ago because as my mind became attuned to liars, overt ones or ones who lie by omission or twisting the truth, I saw Alex Jones for who he is. Simultaneously, my mind also became more attuned to discerning the truth. Even if I didn't like the truth, I couldn't deny it.
The same is true for Russell Brand. He is the same as Alex Jones and the rest, only a variety of flavor. Brand is a shill. It's been proven many times and if that challenges people, then maybe they need the challenge.
What I find interesting is how many other people found their first taste of "the world is not what it seems" while watching people like Jones and Brand who are not what they seem.
That seems to be their purpose in the larger view. They are training wheels.
Defend the people who have been woken by the likes of Brand but encourage them to grow beyond him. More and larger Truths await.
Take off the training wheels and learn what it really means to ride.
God Bless. Yes. God.
You and I have agreed on many things, Pirate. And I agree with you about Alex Jones and can give you my reasons why. But you don't give reasons when you say, "Brand is a shill. It's been proven many times and if that challenges people, then maybe they need the challenge." Without going back to Hollywood Russell or forward to born-again Russell, cite your proof that he was a shill during the years from 2012-2024.
What you're telling me and Mary and Amy and Gan and Maria and JoE and Lyndsey is that we're just toddlers on training wheels, while you are a discerning person who's learned how to really ride into more and larger Truths. I don't accept that assessment of myself, much less of them.
I challenge you to back that up. Read my comment to Sue in which I cite my argument to Ahmad. Tell me, using facts and logic, where I'm wrong. Russell wasn't anywhere near my 'first taste of the world is not what it seems.' By the time I started listening to him, I'd already written a book exposing 28 of those psyops.
My rule is that I only watch, listen, or read what can teach me something new. I listened to over 100 hrs of Russell because I kept learning new perspectives, information and even words. I miss the old Russell, who had 2-3 hr long conversations about ideas in all the topics that interest me. I haven't found anyone to replace him. But I won't watch commercials for anybody, so I'd stopped watching his YT channel and just listened to his podcast.
The point of this article was that people like Mathew are browbeating me into disavowing Russell without taking the time to actually engage point by point. I'm still waiting for anyone to quote him, the way I've done for everyone I've exposed. Where did I fall for something he said? Saying that 7M of us are toddlers using training wheels isn't 'defending' them. I wouldn't stand by if someone said the same about you.
I never said you are a toddler using training wheels. Those are your words and are a misinterpretation. Read what I wrote again if you want to understand.
As for going point by point about Russell Brand, I'm not a video library. I've watched many hours of his programs over the years and many hours of other people breaking down what he's doing and who he's beholden to. Though I saw much about him that I began to distrust prior to realizing others were seeing the same misleading things from him as well. Where he was leading people onto dark paths via the deceptions of the "false light". Primarily through his promotion of "new age" doctrine which is taken directly from Alice Bailey, The Lucis Trust and the UN and their agendas. All of which are thinly and not so thinly disguised Luciferianism also known as Satanic doctrine from the teachings of Aleister Crowley.
I don't have time to prove it all to you when there is plenty of evidence available to you that you can easily find for yourself.
I never said Brand has nothing to teach people. It's what he teaches that is problematic to me.
We can disagree.
I'm glad you responded, Pirate. I hesitated a long time before hitting send, knowing I could be driving away one of my favorite commenters.
My policy is 'love the person, challenge the ideas.' Love, by my definition, is taking the time to understand someone from their own pov. For 7M of us, we love Russell as evidenced by devoting our time to hear what he had to say. It's not a sexual thing or a celebrity thing or a guru thing. My feeling about him is like Amy's, that I wish he was my little brother. I find his banter and quick mind and humor interesting.
Your position, as stated, is "Defend the people who have been woken by the likes of Brand but encourage them to grow beyond him. More and larger Truths await. Take off the training wheels and learn what it really means to ride."
That demeans those who love Russell as being unable to think for themselves while they listen to him. With the other people I mentioned, none of them needed training wheels to know the world isn't what it seems. It makes us into 'followers' not independent minds.
Anyone who's looking for someone to 'believe' is deluded, by definition. They've chosen to make up their mind by 'believing' in advance of their own logic and experience, whether that's Russell, Mathew, Jesus or Buddha. I'm not looking for a 'leader' and I don't think anyone I know who loves Russell is either. Love isn't giving up your power to think. Rather than rejecting him, why not respect the 7M as being equal to yourself in discernment?
IMO, the rejection of 'new age' in favor of authoritarian religions or atheism, is another psyop. It specifically demeans feminine direct spirituality in favor of a hierarchy of religious 'leaders'. And it includes the exact same players who are looking to intimidate rather than debate the ideas. You may have seen this one of mine, but just in case: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/terry-wolfe-spits-on-spirit.
"Defend the people who have been woken by the likes of Brand but encourage them to grow beyond him. More and larger Truths await. Take off the training wheels and learn what it really means to ride."
This simply means keep growing and developing. If encouraging growth is demeaning to you so be it.
Russell Brand is not the repository of all knowledge and truth.
I stand by what I said. There are greater truths and experiences than what listening to Russell Brand can provide. I believe this.
It has been my experience that the more popular an individual becomes the more compromised by the influences of maintaining the benefits of that popularity bestowed by the world also becomes.
There is no free lunch. And Russell Brand is beholden to those who have enabled him to become as popular as he is.
I have no reason to respect popularity or see it as a measure by which I measure my own views. Perhaps you do.
I'm sure you understand what I'm saying. No one rises to multiple millions of fans or subscribers or followers or whatever name is comfortable without the approval of those who control the algorithms that dictate the platforms.
If you don't understand what new age religion is, I encourage you to investigate further. It is not a psyop. It is an ancient religion that seeks to oppose God. Simply put.
I said what I think and I'm sorry that's offensive to you. It wasn't intended to be, so I suppose you have taken this offense on yourself, but I do wish you'd stop dissecting my character.
It's a passive aggressive form of ad hominem attack and I'm finished going through this now.
I love the training wheels analogy but I also can see how Tereza could take offense…
Both Alex Jones and Russell present entertaining and thought provoking ways to look at the world. I see them as making the rabbit holes more inviting for the newbies. I think that’s what you mean by training wheels and I agree.
I thought Russell had some interesting things to say about Covid but overall he wasn’t my cup of tea. I haven’t listened to the same 100 hours of him that Tereza has. Perhaps Russell does have a lot more valuable info to share that I am unaware of.
Maybe I fell for the smear campaign or maybe Russell is a shill. Either way I don’t care. If he did help 7million people become more awakened then his overall impact may have been positive.
I appreciate you being a bridge between Pirate and myself, Anneke, in case the communication jumped off that bridge midway without either of us intending that.
I feel that, for me, Russell certainly didn't tell me anything I didn't already know regarding the CovidCon. I would say the same is true for Mary or Maria in Australia or JoE in Utah or Gan in Maine or Lyndsey in Scotland. All of the people who've connected to me, who also listened to Russell, certainly knew more than he ever said publicly. Was that by design, so he wouldn't lose his platform? I'd guess so. But none of these people needed 'training wheels.' They were all moving forward at lightning speed on the revelations.
What Russell provided was a forum, among ourselves, for people who were saying what he couldn't. What I resonated with wasn't his content but his style--he listens. He responds. He sparks off of what someone else is saying, he doesn't impose his agenda. He genuinely LIKES people of all sorts. I still find that unparalleled with any other interviewer.
What I'm offended by is those who position his listeners as 'followers' or 'believers'. It says more about us than it does about him. I want evidence that I'm a gullible and easily swayed person who's taken in by smooth talkers. I think my body of work says otherwise. And if I'm not, then the time I've spent listening makes me more of an authority on Russell than someone of equal discernment who hasn't put in the time.
That’s a really interesting way to look at Russell’s channel - as a forum to connect with others. Also to admire Russell’s interviewing style is another great angle to look at him. If I were to watch him with that attitude I might appreciate him more.
You are certainly NOT gullible or easily swayed. Your work on Hitler and Churchill showed this to me!
I also think of you as a better authority on Russell than Mathew or I am since you have listened to him far more than either of us have.
And just worth noting that listener/follower/believer are not synonymous with being gullible. Mathew is not realizing that he could be the gullible one by swallowing the Russell smear campaign.