I find it helps a lot to make sense of how the Romans, Judeans and Ashkenazi are linked to go back to the split in The Kingdom of Israel, which took place around 930 BC, after the death of King Solomon. As you know, the Kingdom split into two parts, North and South:
The Southern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Judah, which was comprised of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin. It contained Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple. It was ruled by the house of David until the fall of Jerusalem in 587 BC.
The Northern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Israel, was composed of the territory of the remaining ten tribes.
The ten so-called “Lost” Tribes of Israel migrated north and west into Anatolia and the Caucasus and beyond to Western Europe.
Some of them became the Trojans and, after their defeat in The Trojan Wars, one group migrated to Etruria and went on to found Rome. A second group, led by Brutus of Troy, went to Britain, where he founded a new nation with its capital at New Troy, now known as London, around 485 BC. In both Etruria and Britain, these migrants were warmly welcomed because some of their ancestors had migrated to both places about a thousand years earlier.
The Romans and the Ancient Britons openly acknowledged their relationship.
An important new book about these migrations was published last month:
“The Great Migrations to Britain of 1527 B.C. and 485 B.C.,” by Marchell Abrahams
As R W Morgan tells us in his “History of Britain From The Flood To AD 700” (1848): “The descent of the British People from Troy and the Trojans was never disputed for fifteen hundred years (ie, until the Hanoverian Accession). The "Island of Brutus" was the common name of the Island in old times. The word tan is the old British or Japhetic term for land,—Brutannia (pronounced Britannia, the British u being sounded as ë) is Brut's or Brutus' Land. The term is also of very ancient use in Asia, as Laristan, Feristan, Affghanistan. The only two national names acknowledged by the Ancient Britons are Kymry, and Y Lin Troia, the race of Troy.”
So, in AD 70, the Romans had a thousand-year-old axe to grind with the Judeans?
I would also mention that I have long wondered whether, when the Khazar king was forced to adopt one of the three Abrahamic religions, he chose Judaism because he knew the Khazars - or the Khazar kings at least - were descendants of the “Lost” Ten Tribes.
This is how Morgan begins the Introduction to his book (page 2) about the descendants of Gomer:
"THE history of the great Gomeric or Kimbric race constitutes the grandest drama of old or modern times. It is the primogenital family of mankind; and as such we find its various divisions established under the same or very slightly modified names in different countries in the earliest dawn of tradition and letters. Around the shores of the Black Sea, they were known as Cimmerioi; in Caucasus, Armenia and Bactria, as Gomarai; in the Baltic, Chersonese, and Scandinavia, as Cimbri; in Italy, as Chumbri or Umbri; in Britain, as the Kymry (The modern Welsh word for “Wales” is “Cymru.”) From them have sprung the nations which have led and still lead the destinies of civilization—the Persian and Parthian in ancient Asia—the Roman in Italy—the Norman of the medieval—the Briton of the present era. Of this family, the Keltic race of France, Spain, and Ireland, are the junior branches. "The Kelts are acknowledged," states Diodorus Siculus, "to be a very ancient people—they are nevertheless but, the children of the Kimbri." To write the annals of the whole Gomeric family of nations, would far exceed the powers of one life. Touching only when the subject imperatively demanded it on the history of the other branches, this little volume gives merely the leading incidents in that of the oldest—the Kymry of our island.”
Thank you, Tirion, and I appreciate this new information. Guyenot sees the books of Genesis, with their genealogies, as written perhaps last. So as propaganda, they'd be a mix of lies and truth. What the 'tribes of IsRaEl' narrative does, I think, is take this big chunk of truth you're including here about Gomer (which is new to me) and subsumes it into a hierarchy (hiero-solymi) where IsRaEl is on top. Are there historical sources outside of the Yahweh story that confirm the tribes of IsRaEl narrative that everyone in these racial groups descends from Noah?
I remember in the Biblical genealogy that Perug, maybe, meant split because this is where IsRaEl split into two with Judah. Again, looking at this as retrofitting the history to match the hierarchy, the narrative transfers the real rule of IsRaEl to Joseph/ Osarseph in Egypt.
With the tribes of Gomer, were they also invaders into lands already settled by others? It's interesting that the predatory practices followed with the tribe of Gomer to London and Rome, who partnered in exploitation between the City of London and Holy Roman Empire, the ultimate Hierosgamos.
I found it interesting in the mythology snippet that the Spartoi were mentioned, which seems like the Spartans, I'd guess.
Many thanks, Tereza. Yes, I very much agree that the "Lost" Tribes narrative provides an illuminating context for the relationship between The Vatican and The City of London.
Sources which confirm the narrative, apart from the oral history of the Ancient British, would be the British language (now known as "Welsh") and its unique alphabet ("Coelbren"). This very ancient alphabet is inscribed on stones in Britain, Italy, Switzerland, The Aegean, Turkey, Assyrian clay tablets, stones in Israel, copper in Jordan and mummy cloth in Egypt. Now a growing body of DNA evidence is emerging which also confirms the migration narrative.
I don't know about other places, but before the first wave of migrants led by Albyne arrived in Britain around 1527 BC, Britain is said to have been inhabited by a race of giants, who are thought by some to have been descendants of the original Watchers, from whom Albyne was also descended.
Mind blown, Tirion. I have a video on the Watchers in a draft article on Aliens, Elohim & Archons, oh my! So it seems like the race of giants would be the same as Andrew Power talks about in Ireland?
Yes. There is a lot about giants in British history/mythology, including Gogmagog (or Gog and Magog), who is still celebrated in the annual inauguration parade of The Lord Mayor of The City of London:
Thanks Tirion, this is awesome. Now I have more to study. It seems that what you are saying ties right in with the anthropological info that Robert Sepehr talks about in the early migrations. He has several videos where he points out the movements from the Levant to other areas. There was even a theory that after the fall of Akenaten, his daughter Meritaten traveled as far as present day Scotland; she took the name "Scotia," I am going to look into this further.
You have a wonderfully detailed comment, I love it.
Hello, Nef. That's interesting about 'Scotia.' Does Frances Leader write about that?
To some degree we're talking about an origin story for humanity, and in other ways an imposed divine authority story. Both of those have been conflated. I know the second is false but I wonder if the first is also. I've been loving the Robert Sepehr videos, I need to watch more and put them together.
I'll respond on the Breggins to your comment below.
Sorry to barge in…Michael Tsarion talks a lot about the connection of Egypt to Ireland as well. His books and documentaries on the history and migration are fascinating.
Yes, Robert Sepehr knows what he is talking about. He also cites the growing DNA evidence confirming the migrations from Assyria and The Levant.
I would say the story of Princess Scota is less a theory and more a core element in the oral ancient history of The British Isles. Akhenaten's son, Tutenkhamun, married his half-sister, Helen. She and their daughter were the two Helens of Troy. Given the roles of Helen of Troy and Scota in the history of The British Isles, it would be interesting to understand whether or not they might have been identical? Further reading required!
Did Scota and Albyne, a Sumerian princess, choose to migrate to The British Isles because that is where their ancestors came from? Or were they doing what Trump did with the oil in Syria? Were they occupying the land to protect an important source of copper, and the only source of tin, for making their bronze armaments?
This is the first that I realized bronze is made from copper and tin. On the verge of 67 yrs old and finally this fact comes to my attention. How is that possible?
And this sheds new light on the tin smelting factories being called Jew's houses. I thought that was odd, that it didn't seem very valuable. But no!
I wonder if Trump is a descendent of their family.
There's a possibility of a Basque connection. Bronze and Tin making were a guarded resource. The ancient world had an equivalent of International trade and travel similar to like we do today. Maybe less frequent shipping.
Funny, I'm writing my article in reply to the Breggins now. On the back cover of their book, it asks in bold print, "Who are 'they'--these Global Predators? What are their motives and their plans for us? How can we defend against them?"
Their answers are 1) the corporations against Donald Trump 2) Keep Trump out of office. 3) Get Trump into office. I'm simplifying a little but not much.
One theory going around that makes some sense is that Trump was recruited by Steve Bannon to front for a faction that is in turn fronted by The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), like JFK, Nixon, Carter and Reagan before him. All the other post-war presidents have been fronting for the CIA since it was established in 1947 by NAZI refugees and sympathizers (like the Dulles brothers and others on Wall Street). The CIA supplanted the ONI as the senior intelligence service and the two have been at war ever since. The question is, for whom are the CIA and the ONI fronting?!
They want Trump out of office and in office too? It's like a schizophrenic order of operations.
I'm beginning to like Cliff High just a bit more, he says that Jews have a form of Stockholm Syndrome, a penchant for protecting the Parasites that live in the center of their culture. You would think they would be interested in learning more about the Sabbateans and how to get rid of them. They are who own the central banks. Do the Breggins mention the Bank of International Settlements? Or the Atlantic Council?
Sorry, that was confusing. The agenda of the Global Parasites is to keep Trump out of office. What we can do to fight it is to get him back into office.
Well, that's a funny thing too. Peter mentioned that he's just finishing a book on banking and the Rothschilds just don't really show up. It's an anti-Semitic trope that they're so important. In fact, Christians and Muslims just weren't very interested in money and collecting interest, so the Jews stepped into the void. It was a service they provided, kind of a favor.
I just read the Mathis piece. Interesting but not surprising. I don't know if you watched Isaac Middle's piece on The Orange Moonchild that I linked previously. The astrological signs around Trump have to be faked. And my money is on him just being an actor, as Mathis says.
Fascinating and hidden history. That book is nearly unobtainable, other than from the publisher's website. A book like this will become suppressed and highly collectable by those "in the know". Thanks for sharing the link, without that...this book would remain hidden.
It was only published four weeks ago and the author also owns the publishing company! So far, it is also available from Watkins Books store in London. It's an important book and deserves the widest possible audience; so I hope Marchell has plans for other distribution channels. Please spread the word! It's crammed with information and excellent illustrations. 430 pages, of which 60 pages are index!
This book is destined to be a collectable like the Geletin WTC art book (now $1000) and even Commander Z's infamous "Total Annihilation 2018 A.D.: Prepare for Global Nuclear Conflict", which last I checked was pushing $900. Do not buy these things for the money, it only indicates scarcity value and the "hotness" of the content. The evidence is there if you are willing to look (and if it hasn't been entirely removed from the public).
hola, tereza. again, very very interesting. and is there something in the air around us focused on dismantling the stories of jew and bible? (clif high has called it the age of hyper-novelty or, by old language, the great apocalypse when all the lies are revealed.) anyway, earlier tonight i listened to most of jasun's podcast with kevin barrett and his pretty detailed look at some other aspects of the fakery of the jewish 'experience' narrative. and some of the possible psy-op stuff around the story-making elements of the holocaust and the land of the jews as self made scapegoats to continue the jewish experience psy-op. fascinating stuff, really. the discussion included casual reference to the well established (well known?) role of the zionists in the assassination of jfk and 9/11. (new to me.) if curious: https://childrenofjob.substack.com/p/jobcast-24-a-primordial-persecution
i don't have enough knowledge to refute or confirm what was discussed and so that now becomes another rabbit warren to explore at some point. i'll see how synchronicities guide that search — and it seems between you and jasun, that is starting to get deeper.
as you know i too like etymology and the canaan baal etymology of cannibal raised my eyebrows. and, of course, i checked that out by looking at some other dictionaries and their etymological references. not canaan baal, of course. one of the question marks the 'official' etymology raises is that their sources point to the first usage of cannibal' quite late, 1541 per webster. so.... has this word history been jigged to suit its etymology being 'from Spanish Caníbal, from Taino Caniba,' to keep it away from canaan baal? i confess to 'liking' the canaan baal root, although now i simply don't know and won't take the time to research for earlier usages of something akin to canaan baal before 1541.
and thank you for highlighting that 'religious' narcissistic gaslighting very clearly predates my idea that the roman catholic narrative was likewise narcissistic gaslighting, ie the creation of a false and highly controlled narrative that must be believed in order to be welcomed to the group. religion is, it seems, a rather clever spelling of 'being tied to the ruler'. wow! jung with his deep knowledge of language cites religion as being 're-ligio' tied back. however the official etymologies have a peculiar flavour to them about being studious and re-re-reading repeatedly. however, when i dug down through the links in wiktionary, for example, the etymology does get back to jung's etymology:
Etymology 2
From Proto-Indo-European *leyǵ- (“to bind”).[1]
jung took that as grounding people to the earth. now i wonder, if what was meant was to bind people to narcissistic gaslighting lies.
so much to think about and consider. fascinating stuff. i'm still digesting this. i was at best a very marginal bible dabbler. gracias.
Thanks for those links and references, Guy. I'll check them out.
The idea of cannibal coming from Canaan sacrificing infants to Ba'al and then eating them was in the Not-So-Chosen People video. I believe it included some evidence for that being their practice, or so said the Yahwists. And it concludes by saying, "So before you feel sorry for them being destroyed by the Jews, consider the kind of people they were."
It's curious that someone who just spent a whole video showing that the genealogy of the 'Jew' is a lie based on their own scripture would now take their word for who the Canaanites were and why they deserved to be obliterated.
The Yahwist scripture doesn't hide that Yahweh requires the sacrifice of the first-born from animals and humans. It merely says that with a first-born son, an animal can be substituted. It says nothing about first-born daughters. There's a fictional book I've read called Mexican Gothic that has eerie parallels in the sacrifice and eating of newborn girls. I wonder if the author intended it, or was just writing horror.
So we're left with the Yahwist accusation that the ancestors of the Palestinians ate babies sacrificed to Ba'al (who was merely an agrarian god from other sources, not requiring blood sacrifice) or that this is a projection. What's the nursery rhyme that ends, "What you say is what you are and what you see is what you do?"
i got that from the video too and, like you had cautioned, found it a bit self-serving when it served the purpose of ... more than being simply explicating a false narrative to become a kind of justification for attack video. and as you noted, it certainly appears to be a good concise summary at the same time, as far as i can tell with my recent limited knowledge. (it would be curious if the author of it could/would do something similar to the new testament elements.)
i knew there was blood and all! and yikes, omg, the level of fratricide, filicide and filiacide is over the top.
certainly these kinds of discussions are the great apocalypse in action! dismantling the roots of schismogenic nature of our culture. it is wonderful that you have jumped into it in this way and are a great part of this unveiling. muchas gracias.
Thanks for that confirmation of my feeling in the video. I think the author has swallowed the Jesus story hook, line and sinker. Dislodging the hook of the J isn't going to be enough. There's a movement I'm seeing to cut off the Old Testament in order to leave the Jesus story as untainted. That's a bias I see in Guyenot. And I'm forgetting if Kevin Barrett shares it. To me, making the lies obvious in the OT is the reason to question the NT and why they're tied together.
barrett converted to islam and from just this one listen seems open to looking at the new testament mythos more openly. for example, he 'condemns' the writing of the bible as being at best a self-serving re-framing of divine inspiration while praising the scholarship that 'proves' the texts of islam are the cleanest-closest to the divine. he also refers to guyenot (lol 'not guy!)
in my comment to the discussion i include a link to an ex-moslem who throws some rotten tomatoes at the panegyric that barrett gives islam.
Interesting. I find it suspect when someone critiques one religion in order to show why another is right. The person who's best qualified to critique, whether it's a country or a religion or something else, is the one who's been part of it and loves the people. But it's useful to get that information from the outsider too.
I'll be interested in the ex-muslim comment on Barrett. And that did occur to me also, Guy and Guy Not.
the comment wasn't 'on barrett'. it was the ex-moslem pointing out the blood-lust that is also part of their scripture and so contradicts, at least to some extent, the rosy picture barrett paints.
i think you don't have access to jasun's jobcast?
here's the link i included in my comment:
"The Truth About Islam | Mikhaila Peterson & Apostate Prophet"
From the Chaldean Cahna-bal, "Priest of Baal". Cahna is emphatic form of Cahn, "a priest". Also the feasting upon the same flesh. In the Mass, Catholics are taught the Bread and Wine are magically transformed, transubstantiation, into the actual flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.
I remember the first time a attended a catholic mass, around the age of 14. I was so shocked at the flesh and blood mantra that I actually blurted out loud something like, 'omg! This is cannibalism!'
The link took me to a porn sight.
All the best with what is changing -- everything changes.
The pictures of the five African women remind me of a quote. During "negotiations" Gamal Abdel Nasser was asked if he trusted the Israelis. His answer?
"They left here (Egypt) as black, and they returned (to the M.E.) as white..........., so, no, I don't trust them.
I wrote "negotiations" because the Israeli government never negotiate in good faith.
Very interesting! When I put in those pictures, I was thinking of the Tacitus line, "Many, again, say that they were a race of Ethiopian origin, who in the time of king Cepheus were driven by fear and hatred of their neighbours to seek a new dwelling-place." And Cepheus has parallels to Joseph. I wonder if Nassar has references on that translated into English.
I know that Douglas L. Reed wrote extensively about it in his book "The Controversy of Zion" (which I have read), but if you could give me your take on the Sephardic (I hope I spelled it correctly) Jews here, I would apreciate that.
I am in no doubts that the Rothschilds are at the top of the food chain in the Khazarian mafia, but please explain, if you can, the connectoins.
Haha, you're right. That could certainly be my next post if I knew enough to write about it.
I am also curious about those Sephardic Jews. Did Reed talk about where the name comes from? It seems related to shepard (alternative spelling of shepherd) with the transposition we've been seeing in other words. I was reading about how hated and feared the roving bands of shepherds were. If people were mostly hunters and agrarians, a flock of sheep or cows could be a weapon of mass destruction. Especially if the Sephards were on horseback.
I hadn't read Dean Henderson until recently but I'm finding him interesting and the article on the Protocols that I linked.
Are the Rothschild at the very top of the food chain? I would have thought so but all the Black Nobility stuff has me wondering. Maybe the people at the very top are ones we never see or hear about. I'm certain, though, that if we disempower the Rothschilds, it will also disable whoever's behind them.
The head of the Rothschild family, Sephardic as they may be, is the "Godfather" of the so-called Khazarian mafia. Sephardic Jews settled mostli on the Iberian Peninsula when they were run out of the M.E. They were given an ultimatum at some point. Convert to Catholicism or leave the country.
Honest as they were, they "converted" and continued their Jewish ways in secret.
Anyone who dared bring their sheep west of the Mississippi two hundred years ago were made to regret it.
How does one disable therichest family in the world that has bought just about every government in the world? Now Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Venezuela are the only ones I know of that defy them. It used to be Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan too.
How I would disable them is by refuting their ownership of property through their sleight of hand double-accounting bookkeeping. Sounds dry and boring, I know. Through this trick, 98% of money is created through mortgages, they own our labor, the interest goes to their corporations to profit from the labor they stole, and the value of our savings is diluted so we can never be free of them.
By accident, whilst on another substack, I fell upon author, Ralph Ellis. This is the website edfu-books.uk He has written extensively and has several series of books on why so many of the famous biblical characters are missing from the historical record. Never having an inkling, prior to Covid, that most of history is wrong, I'm tempted to start finding out.
Oh I knew I recognized that name, I ordered his King Jesus book. I haven't read it yet. I suspect that I'll find many interesting clues in his book but there are three of his basic premises with which I don't agree. He takes the Jesus story as about a person who was both real and good. He sees royalty as a good thing. And he takes Josephus as a neutral historian.
But those are just my conclusions, based on my research. I think his connection to the ousting of the Hyksos to the 'Hebrew' eviction is true, and that they were rulers not slaves. Nefahotep writes about that in this article: https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/first-holocaust-in-ancient-history.
Funny, your statement about "Never having an inkling, prior to Covid, that most of history is wrong." Ain't that the truth for so many of us? Once you know you've been lied to about one thing, you can never go back to saying, "They'd never lie about something so big."
I've watched several videos on YT by Sean Hross, Prof of History, Channel called Giureh, he has several more, on the ancient history, from phoenetians, and how they spread globally, and took over the religions. His view on world events is our masters fighting it out, using us peasants of course, between themselves for vertical rule, royality or dictator, against horizontal rule, freemasons, other secret societies. He mentioned in March 2024, it was 100 years since the Ottomans lost their caliphate and he reckons they want it back. All this ancient stuff is completely new, to me, from the bits from the Bible taught in schools which doesn't happen these days. I do enjoy your articles!
History as most of us have been fed is not only wrong, in many cases it's outright deception.
I find it amusing that many authors of "historical" stories feel the need to state that their version is "the" correct one. (See Thucydides quote, below.) For sure, one cannot study history without accurate knowledge of primary documents and the ability to translate them with complete sensitivity of the culture and times in which they were written and some idea of what else was going on simultaneously.
The stuff taught in skoolz and the media is complete rubbish or worse and whenever one hears only one side of the story, you can be sure that it's laughable and that there are many more than 1 or 2 sides to every story. When it comes to "history" we're on our own.
Thucydides quote regarding history.. Please note that this is a translation and as such could be biased or badly mangled in some other ways.
"20. Such then I find to have been the state of things past, hard to be believed, though one produce proof for every particular thereof. For men receive the report of things, though of their own country if done before their own time, all alike, from one as from another, without examination. [2]
…And likewise divers other things now extant, and which time hath not yet involved in oblivion, have been conceived amiss by other Grecians… whereas there was never any such. So impatient of labour are the most men in search of truth, and embrace soonest the things that are next to hand.
21. Now he that by the arguments here adduced shall frame a judgment of the things past and not believe rather that they were such as the poets have sung or prose-writers have composed, more delightfully to the ear than conformably to the truth, as being things not to be disproved and by length of time turned for the most part into the nature of fables without credit, but shall think them here searched out by the most evident signs that can be, and sufficiently too, considering their antiquity: he, I say, shall not err. [2]…
As James Corbett said recently, history should more apropriately be called his/story. It is usually a story written by the victor, but is (most of the time, actually) not necesarily true.
I concluded that myself a long time ago but have since revised it to being the story that we are subjected to by those who claim to be the victors. There is more to it than that tho, but I have too much on my plate at the moment to explain.
For all we know the entire www could be taken down at any given moment. Nothing is safe there. Imagine all the people round the world who have everything, their entire lives even, in a "cloud". How stupid is that?
You are very perceptive. This is what I continue to do; save ALL the receipts, keep copies. Back up your data 6 different ways. written info is best kept printed out if it's really important. If there is no power, you can't run a computer. But a piece of paper needs no batteries. ;-)
Hey N, I must say that I am beyond peeved that your superb (as always) contributions were erased over at the Breggins SS. It's everyone's loss. I rarely bother getting angry anymore, but that has me miffed.
I was able to save copies of the comments that got deleted.
They are part of a very long post I am going to send out by next week. It's on Adolf Eichmann. I'll be presenting what may be the real organizers of the Holocaust.
By the way, I am really enjoying your contributions to these discussions, it's helpful in building a good knowledge base.
It all makes me think of what a violent, miserable lot we have been and are.
One has to wonder if we have ever lived in peace. I think not.
I sure hope we can somehow find our way to it now.
But I think it's not going to be by everyone coming together - that seems unlikely.
About the only way this is going to work is if the Shift allows us to create our own realities not subject to the belief systems of others, and the ability to choose to participate in others' realities or not.
The next few decades are going to be interesting as this pans out.
Oh I think it should make you think the opposite, Philip! We've never been a violent, miserable lot when left to our own devices. We had genius ways of getting along and governing ourselves, many of which were developed by women. Except for squabbles over hunting territories, that kept aggressors from exploiting land they didn't care for, we were peaceful. Every one of us comes from an indigenous ancestor somewhere in our heritage--people who were settled and knew how to live in place. That knowledge has been re-placed with a vocabulary, religion, monetary system and politics of conquest. It's not our nature.
Agreed on the next few decades being interesting! And even years, I'm afraid.
"The migration into Khazaria at the end of the first millennium barely precedes 1066, when William the Conqueror seized control of England and brought in large numbers of juiu as they were known in French."
On 25 September that year Harald Godwinson (England) defeated Harald the Harsh Ruler (Norway) at Stamford Bridge. A little more than two weeks later, on 10/14 (I have read somewhere that it was 10/10), the former was defeated at Hastings by William the Conqueror. They usually fought until sundown, so sundown on 10/14/1066 marks the end of the viking era.
There once was a gigantic viking named Rolf. He was so big he could not ride, so he walked.
Walking Rolf took over Normandy. So, yes, the Normans came from vikings. The two Haralds that died in 1066 were the two last viking kings, hence the end of the viking era when Godwinson died.
Hmm. Well this explains why my Viking Helmet is too big for me.....................I guess I purchased the "Rolf" model online thinking I was getting deal. As Tereza referenced once, at least the horns were removable for holding fermented libations.
What a lovely thing to say! However I'm not on instagram so it won't let me see it, but it let me see other thumbnails of hers including the definition of re-gime. I love that!
I wouldn't personally describe those who self-identify as Jews as 'tribal' (although perhaps I did, I didn't reread my article). The diaspora is encouraged so as to leverage a global mercantile, media and money power so that 1% of a population can control the other 99%.
And absolutely yes on group sociopathy based on a sociopathic theology, fictional history and group-identity that could certainly be called narcissistic. There are too many quotes to cite supporting that.
"Holy origins Batwoman !" Tereza, a lot of interest in your latest and Brilliant deductions from your exceptional research and gathering of others work on the topic here. What's more interesting are the possibilities that there must be a lil-bit of "Jew" in just about EVERYBODY in America and of course the world. That's my take.
Always a pleasure engaging in your work and introductions to other knowledgeable Authors. Especially like your delivery. Which makes consuming your content so fascinating. Well done.🤩
"There is no Aramaic or Hebrew source for the gospels. Even the parables, direct quotes presumed to be from ‘Jesus’ to Judean peasants, use Greek tropes and puns that only make sense in Greek."
I'm pretty ignorant about this (despite having read Burton Mack's "Q" book). But would it be possible that the Greek-speaking writers of the gospels took Q, translated it, and added the miracle stories along with their own spicy Greek puns? Or would they not know Aramaic and hence couldn't read Q? Or maybe they just heard Q via word-of-mouth after it had been told and retold and altered and translated a bunch of times over the years, and never saw it written down?
Or maybe all this is ignorant speculation and the Q hypothesis just a way to prop up the idea of the historical Jesus?
It was a historical Bible scholar who presented at the Jesus Seminars, the international conference of Bible scholars, over a decade ago. I don't have a written copy of it but he blew the whole Q theory out of the water. He was one of a very refined and specialized group of linguists whose focus was on the origins. It was his examples with the parables and quotes that particularly struck me.
So here are the things about Jesus that have been voted inauthentic after lengthy and detailed presentations by the most renowned scholars across the globe: the name (duh), the birth date, the home town of Nazareth, the flight into Egypt and killing of firstborns, the trial by Pontius Pilate, and 85% of all quotes attributed to him. Why? Because they were already documented by other people, mentioned as history things that hadn't happened, or didn't make sense in that language.
Oh and the incident where he goes into a temple in Nazareth, reads from a scroll, they ask him to perform a miracle and then try to throw him off a cliff (no prophet in his home town ...)? There's no archeological evidence of a temple in Nazareth, 99% of people were illiterate so there'd be no scroll, and most importantly--no cliff!
So sure, Mack can devise a whole hypothesis around Q. But first, what are the biographical markers of this person that Q is hypothetically about? That's what I'd like to know.
Tereza, I love the permission at the beginning - no one has to read or follow everything, and you don't have to cater to anyone but your own interests. Brilliant.
I can't quite keep up with all the details...here's what comes up in me in response - my husband is visiting his sister for Passover, bringing our son there. And I have chosen not to go this year. Such a relief. From what I hear, some people make passover quite fun, and one friend tells me its ultimate theme is about freedom and liberation. It's interesting to contemplate that the story of passover is maybe told by the victors rather than the victims. That jews have been treated poorly because of the baseline assumption that their god is the only god, they are the chosen ones, and they are instructed to dominate and enslave all others. So maybe there is truth that other cultures have not liked this group of people, but I also don't like anyone who tries to dominate me. Thanks for bringing good questions and honest explorations to this world!
Thank you, marta, for your generous response. It gets very tricky when it's tied to the personal identities of those we love. I'm going to try to go to the heart of that conflict in my next, so I appreciate your reading of this.
It's also hard to separate the meanings of holidays from the ways we've made them fun. I love Thanksgiving but the reality behind it is horrific. In the show notes for Scrooge, I remember reading that rents were collected once a year in olden times, just before Christmas. So families were evicted and impoverished, leading to lavish feasts and presents for the rich.
Purim celebrates the slaughter of 75,000 people, including women and suckling infants. And the Hebrew Bible says that after the trek through the desert, they invaded Canaan and drove all the people out of their homes. So that's what's being toasted with those lit menorahs.
On the assumptions, Guyenot distinguishes between an inclusive monotheistic god and exclusive supremacist god. It's not that their god is the only one, it's that everyone who's not chosen by that god is no different than an animal. Specifically born to serve the chosen in human form, it says that very explicitly.
But as this article points out, there may be no one who identifies as a Jew whose ancestors survived the slaughter of Judea by the Romans and let into the city by the high priests. The royal lineage and tax collectors hated the Jews, which is what the story of Jesus is about. So it's possible that the highly visible genocide of Canaanites/ Palestinians is being staged to provoke a reaction against the Jews (in Hebrew, with Y for J, Yews or use).
This would help the real perpetrators have a fresh victim shield (Red Shield, Rothschild) to hide behind. So even the instruction to dominate and enslave are ultimately to the benefit of those they serve.
Thanks for sticking with these difficult questions and holding my explorations in good faith!
I have noted a vigorous debate between Karl Haemers (substack Taboo Truth) and Joseph Atwill regarding the alleged [by Atwill] ‘occult roots of Nazism’, so I don’t know what to make of Atwill.
Nevertheless, let me mention Akarya S (D M Murdock) who wrote ‘Christ in Egypt - The Horus-Jesus Connection’, and more importantly, ‘Did Moses Exist? The Myth of the Israelite Lawgiver’.
...
My introduction to Acharya S. (Dorothy Milne Murdock) was via this great two-part interview:
• Awake in our Mythology, The Christ Conspiracy Part 1 - Shadow Walker
Priestcraft! What an excellent, novel term to capture an ancient malevolent practice of manipulating entire cultures.
And your recommendation of Hellstorm changed my perspective forever.
Joe Atwill is a friend but I wouldn't base my agreement or disagreement with anyone's research on friendship. I don't know his work on that (oh wait, he did a piece that Mathew Crawford published) but it seems like it coincides with the svastika, colors, Theosophist alliance between Hitler and Madame Blavatsky and royal families.
It seems like we're all in agreement on what was done by the Bolshevik Jews/ Int'l Zionists to Germans in the World Wars and what was NOT done by Germans to Jews. With that, we're probably in the 1% of all people's understanding. The open question is whether Hitler was complicit or not. My question to you is, what difference would it make? As you know, I ask that as an honest question, not a rhetorical one.
I have the Acharya video in a draft, along with some of painstaking progress in producing a transcript from YT's clunky tool, that requires inserting punctuation and capitals, and taking out line breaks every four words. I found it very compelling but also neutral in terms of morality. It presents the substitution of Jesus for Horus as mere mythology, not a ploy by empires and their priests to enmesh sovereign people into their schemes of conquest and domination through taxation and obedience. So, again, it hasn't made it to the top of my 'what difference does it make?' list. But it's pretty close.
"... inserting punctuation and capitals, and taking out line breaks every four words". IKR (I know, right) - and removing the actual timestamps. I have that tedious process down to a fine art. At least YT offers the transcript function which I yearn for in Bitchute, Odysee and Rumble.
More on that other question as we continue on this journey. Even if rhetorical, it requires an answer. The first part of the answer is that finding the truth is a matter of personal liberation - dare I say, deeply spiritual.
Thanks for all the major landmarks and trailblazing.
Oh I can save you one step! You can turn off the timestamps. After you turn the transcript on, there are three dots to the upper right that show 'toggle timestamps.' Viola! I once pronouned that vee-i-ola when rehearsing for a play. What are you going to do, Julius, with all the time I just saved you deleting five characters every four words?
Here's how it translates my name, when I pulled it up to figure this out: Teresa kajio
"Guyenot describes Yahweh as ‘a sociopath among the gods,’ who isn’t monotheistic but supremacist through the bloodthirsty destruction of all other gods, their temples, their followers."
For a full accounting, see "Drunk With Blood: God's Kllings in the Bible":
Haha, I'm going to put down 'blotchy pink' next time I fill out one of those race questionnaires.
I think the Irish with red hair would be a different theory than the red skin, although I realize I conflated them. Pretty sharp for a rabbit, you are. But that does bring me to my theory on the 'leprosy'! The Irish taken as slaves to the Bahama sugar plantations developed a strange skin pigmentation of dark blotches. If the 'giants' came from Ireland during a time when a membrane held the moisture in, protecting them from the sun and reducing the pull of gravity, the sudden Egyptian sun exposure would have been intense on their skin. Maybe they became like spotted pigs, and that was the prohibition against pork--rather than the pigs carrying leprosy, which doesn't seem to be a thing. Anyway, that's my theory hot off the griddle.
Wow - great post, Tereza! Thank you.
I find it helps a lot to make sense of how the Romans, Judeans and Ashkenazi are linked to go back to the split in The Kingdom of Israel, which took place around 930 BC, after the death of King Solomon. As you know, the Kingdom split into two parts, North and South:
The Southern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Judah, which was comprised of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin. It contained Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple. It was ruled by the house of David until the fall of Jerusalem in 587 BC.
The Northern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Israel, was composed of the territory of the remaining ten tribes.
The ten so-called “Lost” Tribes of Israel migrated north and west into Anatolia and the Caucasus and beyond to Western Europe.
Some of them became the Trojans and, after their defeat in The Trojan Wars, one group migrated to Etruria and went on to found Rome. A second group, led by Brutus of Troy, went to Britain, where he founded a new nation with its capital at New Troy, now known as London, around 485 BC. In both Etruria and Britain, these migrants were warmly welcomed because some of their ancestors had migrated to both places about a thousand years earlier.
The Romans and the Ancient Britons openly acknowledged their relationship.
An important new book about these migrations was published last month:
“The Great Migrations to Britain of 1527 B.C. and 485 B.C.,” by Marchell Abrahams
https://williamcongreve.co.uk/books/p3qeyjknbrkd6bmk/the-great-migrations-to-britain-of-1527-bc-and-485-bc/
As R W Morgan tells us in his “History of Britain From The Flood To AD 700” (1848): “The descent of the British People from Troy and the Trojans was never disputed for fifteen hundred years (ie, until the Hanoverian Accession). The "Island of Brutus" was the common name of the Island in old times. The word tan is the old British or Japhetic term for land,—Brutannia (pronounced Britannia, the British u being sounded as ë) is Brut's or Brutus' Land. The term is also of very ancient use in Asia, as Laristan, Feristan, Affghanistan. The only two national names acknowledged by the Ancient Britons are Kymry, and Y Lin Troia, the race of Troy.”
So, in AD 70, the Romans had a thousand-year-old axe to grind with the Judeans?
I would also mention that I have long wondered whether, when the Khazar king was forced to adopt one of the three Abrahamic religions, he chose Judaism because he knew the Khazars - or the Khazar kings at least - were descendants of the “Lost” Ten Tribes.
This is how Morgan begins the Introduction to his book (page 2) about the descendants of Gomer:
"THE history of the great Gomeric or Kimbric race constitutes the grandest drama of old or modern times. It is the primogenital family of mankind; and as such we find its various divisions established under the same or very slightly modified names in different countries in the earliest dawn of tradition and letters. Around the shores of the Black Sea, they were known as Cimmerioi; in Caucasus, Armenia and Bactria, as Gomarai; in the Baltic, Chersonese, and Scandinavia, as Cimbri; in Italy, as Chumbri or Umbri; in Britain, as the Kymry (The modern Welsh word for “Wales” is “Cymru.”) From them have sprung the nations which have led and still lead the destinies of civilization—the Persian and Parthian in ancient Asia—the Roman in Italy—the Norman of the medieval—the Briton of the present era. Of this family, the Keltic race of France, Spain, and Ireland, are the junior branches. "The Kelts are acknowledged," states Diodorus Siculus, "to be a very ancient people—they are nevertheless but, the children of the Kimbri." To write the annals of the whole Gomeric family of nations, would far exceed the powers of one life. Touching only when the subject imperatively demanded it on the history of the other branches, this little volume gives merely the leading incidents in that of the oldest—the Kymry of our island.”
https://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/More%2016%20History%20of%20Britain%20%20by%20R%20W%20MORGAN%20(1848)%20(2).pdf
Thank you, Tirion, and I appreciate this new information. Guyenot sees the books of Genesis, with their genealogies, as written perhaps last. So as propaganda, they'd be a mix of lies and truth. What the 'tribes of IsRaEl' narrative does, I think, is take this big chunk of truth you're including here about Gomer (which is new to me) and subsumes it into a hierarchy (hiero-solymi) where IsRaEl is on top. Are there historical sources outside of the Yahweh story that confirm the tribes of IsRaEl narrative that everyone in these racial groups descends from Noah?
I remember in the Biblical genealogy that Perug, maybe, meant split because this is where IsRaEl split into two with Judah. Again, looking at this as retrofitting the history to match the hierarchy, the narrative transfers the real rule of IsRaEl to Joseph/ Osarseph in Egypt.
With the tribes of Gomer, were they also invaders into lands already settled by others? It's interesting that the predatory practices followed with the tribe of Gomer to London and Rome, who partnered in exploitation between the City of London and Holy Roman Empire, the ultimate Hierosgamos.
I found it interesting in the mythology snippet that the Spartoi were mentioned, which seems like the Spartans, I'd guess.
Thanks for all you add to these discussions!
Many thanks, Tereza. Yes, I very much agree that the "Lost" Tribes narrative provides an illuminating context for the relationship between The Vatican and The City of London.
Sources which confirm the narrative, apart from the oral history of the Ancient British, would be the British language (now known as "Welsh") and its unique alphabet ("Coelbren"). This very ancient alphabet is inscribed on stones in Britain, Italy, Switzerland, The Aegean, Turkey, Assyrian clay tablets, stones in Israel, copper in Jordan and mummy cloth in Egypt. Now a growing body of DNA evidence is emerging which also confirms the migration narrative.
I don't know about other places, but before the first wave of migrants led by Albyne arrived in Britain around 1527 BC, Britain is said to have been inhabited by a race of giants, who are thought by some to have been descendants of the original Watchers, from whom Albyne was also descended.
Mind blown, Tirion. I have a video on the Watchers in a draft article on Aliens, Elohim & Archons, oh my! So it seems like the race of giants would be the same as Andrew Power talks about in Ireland?
Yes. There is a lot about giants in British history/mythology, including Gogmagog (or Gog and Magog), who is still celebrated in the annual inauguration parade of The Lord Mayor of The City of London:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDcmS9ruxhs&pp=ygUdZ29nIG1hZ29nIGxvcmQgbWF5b3IncyBwYXJhZGU%3D
Marchell Abrahams also writes about the giants in her new book, referenced in my earlier comment.
Thanks Tirion, this is awesome. Now I have more to study. It seems that what you are saying ties right in with the anthropological info that Robert Sepehr talks about in the early migrations. He has several videos where he points out the movements from the Levant to other areas. There was even a theory that after the fall of Akenaten, his daughter Meritaten traveled as far as present day Scotland; she took the name "Scotia," I am going to look into this further.
You have a wonderfully detailed comment, I love it.
Hello, Nef. That's interesting about 'Scotia.' Does Frances Leader write about that?
To some degree we're talking about an origin story for humanity, and in other ways an imposed divine authority story. Both of those have been conflated. I know the second is false but I wonder if the first is also. I've been loving the Robert Sepehr videos, I need to watch more and put them together.
I'll respond on the Breggins to your comment below.
Here's the Robert Sepehr video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGwgkQUV0H8
It's only about 10 min. He starts to talk about Scotia, at about 5 min mark. Then, Hyksos and the migration of people into Egypt. Interesting stuff.
I got the location wrong; sorry, it's in Ireland where she was not Scotland.
Sorry to barge in…Michael Tsarion talks a lot about the connection of Egypt to Ireland as well. His books and documentaries on the history and migration are fascinating.
Love this theme, thanks all!
I'll check out Michael Tsarion. And you saw the one I did on Andrew Power and Irish Pharaohs, I think.
Robert Sepehr has a video on Scotia. It's not as long as some, but quite interesting. I'll see if I can find it, I'll post a link.
Many thanks, Nefahotep.
Yes, Robert Sepehr knows what he is talking about. He also cites the growing DNA evidence confirming the migrations from Assyria and The Levant.
I would say the story of Princess Scota is less a theory and more a core element in the oral ancient history of The British Isles. Akhenaten's son, Tutenkhamun, married his half-sister, Helen. She and their daughter were the two Helens of Troy. Given the roles of Helen of Troy and Scota in the history of The British Isles, it would be interesting to understand whether or not they might have been identical? Further reading required!
Did Scota and Albyne, a Sumerian princess, choose to migrate to The British Isles because that is where their ancestors came from? Or were they doing what Trump did with the oil in Syria? Were they occupying the land to protect an important source of copper, and the only source of tin, for making their bronze armaments?
This is the first that I realized bronze is made from copper and tin. On the verge of 67 yrs old and finally this fact comes to my attention. How is that possible?
And this sheds new light on the tin smelting factories being called Jew's houses. I thought that was odd, that it didn't seem very valuable. But no!
I wonder if Trump is a descendent of their family.
There's a possibility of a Basque connection. Bronze and Tin making were a guarded resource. The ancient world had an equivalent of International trade and travel similar to like we do today. Maybe less frequent shipping.
Funny, I'm writing my article in reply to the Breggins now. On the back cover of their book, it asks in bold print, "Who are 'they'--these Global Predators? What are their motives and their plans for us? How can we defend against them?"
Their answers are 1) the corporations against Donald Trump 2) Keep Trump out of office. 3) Get Trump into office. I'm simplifying a little but not much.
One theory going around that makes some sense is that Trump was recruited by Steve Bannon to front for a faction that is in turn fronted by The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), like JFK, Nixon, Carter and Reagan before him. All the other post-war presidents have been fronting for the CIA since it was established in 1947 by NAZI refugees and sympathizers (like the Dulles brothers and others on Wall Street). The CIA supplanted the ONI as the senior intelligence service and the two have been at war ever since. The question is, for whom are the CIA and the ONI fronting?!
They want Trump out of office and in office too? It's like a schizophrenic order of operations.
I'm beginning to like Cliff High just a bit more, he says that Jews have a form of Stockholm Syndrome, a penchant for protecting the Parasites that live in the center of their culture. You would think they would be interested in learning more about the Sabbateans and how to get rid of them. They are who own the central banks. Do the Breggins mention the Bank of International Settlements? Or the Atlantic Council?
Sorry, that was confusing. The agenda of the Global Parasites is to keep Trump out of office. What we can do to fight it is to get him back into office.
Well, that's a funny thing too. Peter mentioned that he's just finishing a book on banking and the Rothschilds just don't really show up. It's an anti-Semitic trope that they're so important. In fact, Christians and Muslims just weren't very interested in money and collecting interest, so the Jews stepped into the void. It was a service they provided, kind of a favor.
Doesn't Trump have blue eyes? Wouldn't that make him a descendant of Japheth (and Gomer?). Wish I knew! Miles Mathis has a different assessment:
http://mileswmathis.com/trump.pdf
I just read the Mathis piece. Interesting but not surprising. I don't know if you watched Isaac Middle's piece on The Orange Moonchild that I linked previously. The astrological signs around Trump have to be faked. And my money is on him just being an actor, as Mathis says.
Yes, not surprising. Mathis says everyone is Jewish!
Fascinating and hidden history. That book is nearly unobtainable, other than from the publisher's website. A book like this will become suppressed and highly collectable by those "in the know". Thanks for sharing the link, without that...this book would remain hidden.
It was only published four weeks ago and the author also owns the publishing company! So far, it is also available from Watkins Books store in London. It's an important book and deserves the widest possible audience; so I hope Marchell has plans for other distribution channels. Please spread the word! It's crammed with information and excellent illustrations. 430 pages, of which 60 pages are index!
I was just looking at her website, which doesn't seem to have a way to order and pay for the book. I'll check out Watkins.
Here's the link, I ordered over the weekend and already got an email response from her.
https://williamcongreve.co.uk/books/p3qeyjknbrkd6bmk/the-great-migrations-to-britain-of-1527-bc-and-485-bc/
This book is destined to be a collectable like the Geletin WTC art book (now $1000) and even Commander Z's infamous "Total Annihilation 2018 A.D.: Prepare for Global Nuclear Conflict", which last I checked was pushing $900. Do not buy these things for the money, it only indicates scarcity value and the "hotness" of the content. The evidence is there if you are willing to look (and if it hasn't been entirely removed from the public).
You should be able to use Stripe to order and pay:
https://buy.stripe.com/28oaFC0eN4mg3QY8wz
hola, tereza. again, very very interesting. and is there something in the air around us focused on dismantling the stories of jew and bible? (clif high has called it the age of hyper-novelty or, by old language, the great apocalypse when all the lies are revealed.) anyway, earlier tonight i listened to most of jasun's podcast with kevin barrett and his pretty detailed look at some other aspects of the fakery of the jewish 'experience' narrative. and some of the possible psy-op stuff around the story-making elements of the holocaust and the land of the jews as self made scapegoats to continue the jewish experience psy-op. fascinating stuff, really. the discussion included casual reference to the well established (well known?) role of the zionists in the assassination of jfk and 9/11. (new to me.) if curious: https://childrenofjob.substack.com/p/jobcast-24-a-primordial-persecution
i don't have enough knowledge to refute or confirm what was discussed and so that now becomes another rabbit warren to explore at some point. i'll see how synchronicities guide that search — and it seems between you and jasun, that is starting to get deeper.
as you know i too like etymology and the canaan baal etymology of cannibal raised my eyebrows. and, of course, i checked that out by looking at some other dictionaries and their etymological references. not canaan baal, of course. one of the question marks the 'official' etymology raises is that their sources point to the first usage of cannibal' quite late, 1541 per webster. so.... has this word history been jigged to suit its etymology being 'from Spanish Caníbal, from Taino Caniba,' to keep it away from canaan baal? i confess to 'liking' the canaan baal root, although now i simply don't know and won't take the time to research for earlier usages of something akin to canaan baal before 1541.
and thank you for highlighting that 'religious' narcissistic gaslighting very clearly predates my idea that the roman catholic narrative was likewise narcissistic gaslighting, ie the creation of a false and highly controlled narrative that must be believed in order to be welcomed to the group. religion is, it seems, a rather clever spelling of 'being tied to the ruler'. wow! jung with his deep knowledge of language cites religion as being 're-ligio' tied back. however the official etymologies have a peculiar flavour to them about being studious and re-re-reading repeatedly. however, when i dug down through the links in wiktionary, for example, the etymology does get back to jung's etymology:
Etymology 2
From Proto-Indo-European *leyǵ- (“to bind”).[1]
jung took that as grounding people to the earth. now i wonder, if what was meant was to bind people to narcissistic gaslighting lies.
so much to think about and consider. fascinating stuff. i'm still digesting this. i was at best a very marginal bible dabbler. gracias.
Thanks for those links and references, Guy. I'll check them out.
The idea of cannibal coming from Canaan sacrificing infants to Ba'al and then eating them was in the Not-So-Chosen People video. I believe it included some evidence for that being their practice, or so said the Yahwists. And it concludes by saying, "So before you feel sorry for them being destroyed by the Jews, consider the kind of people they were."
It's curious that someone who just spent a whole video showing that the genealogy of the 'Jew' is a lie based on their own scripture would now take their word for who the Canaanites were and why they deserved to be obliterated.
The Yahwist scripture doesn't hide that Yahweh requires the sacrifice of the first-born from animals and humans. It merely says that with a first-born son, an animal can be substituted. It says nothing about first-born daughters. There's a fictional book I've read called Mexican Gothic that has eerie parallels in the sacrifice and eating of newborn girls. I wonder if the author intended it, or was just writing horror.
So we're left with the Yahwist accusation that the ancestors of the Palestinians ate babies sacrificed to Ba'al (who was merely an agrarian god from other sources, not requiring blood sacrifice) or that this is a projection. What's the nursery rhyme that ends, "What you say is what you are and what you see is what you do?"
hola, tereza.
i got that from the video too and, like you had cautioned, found it a bit self-serving when it served the purpose of ... more than being simply explicating a false narrative to become a kind of justification for attack video. and as you noted, it certainly appears to be a good concise summary at the same time, as far as i can tell with my recent limited knowledge. (it would be curious if the author of it could/would do something similar to the new testament elements.)
i knew there was blood and all! and yikes, omg, the level of fratricide, filicide and filiacide is over the top.
certainly these kinds of discussions are the great apocalypse in action! dismantling the roots of schismogenic nature of our culture. it is wonderful that you have jumped into it in this way and are a great part of this unveiling. muchas gracias.
Thanks for that confirmation of my feeling in the video. I think the author has swallowed the Jesus story hook, line and sinker. Dislodging the hook of the J isn't going to be enough. There's a movement I'm seeing to cut off the Old Testament in order to leave the Jesus story as untainted. That's a bias I see in Guyenot. And I'm forgetting if Kevin Barrett shares it. To me, making the lies obvious in the OT is the reason to question the NT and why they're tied together.
Yes to the great apocalypse in action!
barrett converted to islam and from just this one listen seems open to looking at the new testament mythos more openly. for example, he 'condemns' the writing of the bible as being at best a self-serving re-framing of divine inspiration while praising the scholarship that 'proves' the texts of islam are the cleanest-closest to the divine. he also refers to guyenot (lol 'not guy!)
in my comment to the discussion i include a link to an ex-moslem who throws some rotten tomatoes at the panegyric that barrett gives islam.
Interesting. I find it suspect when someone critiques one religion in order to show why another is right. The person who's best qualified to critique, whether it's a country or a religion or something else, is the one who's been part of it and loves the people. But it's useful to get that information from the outsider too.
I'll be interested in the ex-muslim comment on Barrett. And that did occur to me also, Guy and Guy Not.
the comment wasn't 'on barrett'. it was the ex-moslem pointing out the blood-lust that is also part of their scripture and so contradicts, at least to some extent, the rosy picture barrett paints.
i think you don't have access to jasun's jobcast?
here's the link i included in my comment:
"The Truth About Islam | Mikhaila Peterson & Apostate Prophet"
https://youtu.be/EoSKE9QzRw8
Cannibal:
From the Chaldean Cahna-bal, "Priest of Baal". Cahna is emphatic form of Cahn, "a priest". Also the feasting upon the same flesh. In the Mass, Catholics are taught the Bread and Wine are magically transformed, transubstantiation, into the actual flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.
http://www.comeandhear.com/dilling/chapt08.html#Moloch
.
Hola, km.
Thank you for these details.
I remember the first time a attended a catholic mass, around the age of 14. I was so shocked at the flesh and blood mantra that I actually blurted out loud something like, 'omg! This is cannibalism!'
The link took me to a porn sight.
All the best with what is changing -- everything changes.
The pictures of the five African women remind me of a quote. During "negotiations" Gamal Abdel Nasser was asked if he trusted the Israelis. His answer?
"They left here (Egypt) as black, and they returned (to the M.E.) as white..........., so, no, I don't trust them.
I wrote "negotiations" because the Israeli government never negotiate in good faith.
Very interesting! When I put in those pictures, I was thinking of the Tacitus line, "Many, again, say that they were a race of Ethiopian origin, who in the time of king Cepheus were driven by fear and hatred of their neighbours to seek a new dwelling-place." And Cepheus has parallels to Joseph. I wonder if Nassar has references on that translated into English.
I know that Douglas L. Reed wrote extensively about it in his book "The Controversy of Zion" (which I have read), but if you could give me your take on the Sephardic (I hope I spelled it correctly) Jews here, I would apreciate that.
I am in no doubts that the Rothschilds are at the top of the food chain in the Khazarian mafia, but please explain, if you can, the connectoins.
So, there you have it. That's your next post. ;-)
Haha, you're right. That could certainly be my next post if I knew enough to write about it.
I am also curious about those Sephardic Jews. Did Reed talk about where the name comes from? It seems related to shepard (alternative spelling of shepherd) with the transposition we've been seeing in other words. I was reading about how hated and feared the roving bands of shepherds were. If people were mostly hunters and agrarians, a flock of sheep or cows could be a weapon of mass destruction. Especially if the Sephards were on horseback.
I hadn't read Dean Henderson until recently but I'm finding him interesting and the article on the Protocols that I linked.
Are the Rothschild at the very top of the food chain? I would have thought so but all the Black Nobility stuff has me wondering. Maybe the people at the very top are ones we never see or hear about. I'm certain, though, that if we disempower the Rothschilds, it will also disable whoever's behind them.
The head of the Rothschild family, Sephardic as they may be, is the "Godfather" of the so-called Khazarian mafia. Sephardic Jews settled mostli on the Iberian Peninsula when they were run out of the M.E. They were given an ultimatum at some point. Convert to Catholicism or leave the country.
Honest as they were, they "converted" and continued their Jewish ways in secret.
Anyone who dared bring their sheep west of the Mississippi two hundred years ago were made to regret it.
How does one disable therichest family in the world that has bought just about every government in the world? Now Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Venezuela are the only ones I know of that defy them. It used to be Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan too.
How I would disable them is by refuting their ownership of property through their sleight of hand double-accounting bookkeeping. Sounds dry and boring, I know. Through this trick, 98% of money is created through mortgages, they own our labor, the interest goes to their corporations to profit from the labor they stole, and the value of our savings is diluted so we can never be free of them.
My book, How to Dismantle an Empire, shows what we could do by communities having the exclusive right to issue mortgages and the credit to repay them: https://www.amazon.com/How-Dismantle-Empire-2020-Vision/dp/1733347607.
Hysterical. If they'd only emigrated to Mars, they would have returned "green".
They were only trying to catch up with all the Jesus paintings in "proper" Western Civilization churches.
By accident, whilst on another substack, I fell upon author, Ralph Ellis. This is the website edfu-books.uk He has written extensively and has several series of books on why so many of the famous biblical characters are missing from the historical record. Never having an inkling, prior to Covid, that most of history is wrong, I'm tempted to start finding out.
Oh I knew I recognized that name, I ordered his King Jesus book. I haven't read it yet. I suspect that I'll find many interesting clues in his book but there are three of his basic premises with which I don't agree. He takes the Jesus story as about a person who was both real and good. He sees royalty as a good thing. And he takes Josephus as a neutral historian.
But those are just my conclusions, based on my research. I think his connection to the ousting of the Hyksos to the 'Hebrew' eviction is true, and that they were rulers not slaves. Nefahotep writes about that in this article: https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/first-holocaust-in-ancient-history.
Funny, your statement about "Never having an inkling, prior to Covid, that most of history is wrong." Ain't that the truth for so many of us? Once you know you've been lied to about one thing, you can never go back to saying, "They'd never lie about something so big."
I've watched several videos on YT by Sean Hross, Prof of History, Channel called Giureh, he has several more, on the ancient history, from phoenetians, and how they spread globally, and took over the religions. His view on world events is our masters fighting it out, using us peasants of course, between themselves for vertical rule, royality or dictator, against horizontal rule, freemasons, other secret societies. He mentioned in March 2024, it was 100 years since the Ottomans lost their caliphate and he reckons they want it back. All this ancient stuff is completely new, to me, from the bits from the Bible taught in schools which doesn't happen these days. I do enjoy your articles!
History as most of us have been fed is not only wrong, in many cases it's outright deception.
I find it amusing that many authors of "historical" stories feel the need to state that their version is "the" correct one. (See Thucydides quote, below.) For sure, one cannot study history without accurate knowledge of primary documents and the ability to translate them with complete sensitivity of the culture and times in which they were written and some idea of what else was going on simultaneously.
The stuff taught in skoolz and the media is complete rubbish or worse and whenever one hears only one side of the story, you can be sure that it's laughable and that there are many more than 1 or 2 sides to every story. When it comes to "history" we're on our own.
Thucydides quote regarding history.. Please note that this is a translation and as such could be biased or badly mangled in some other ways.
"20. Such then I find to have been the state of things past, hard to be believed, though one produce proof for every particular thereof. For men receive the report of things, though of their own country if done before their own time, all alike, from one as from another, without examination. [2]
…And likewise divers other things now extant, and which time hath not yet involved in oblivion, have been conceived amiss by other Grecians… whereas there was never any such. So impatient of labour are the most men in search of truth, and embrace soonest the things that are next to hand.
21. Now he that by the arguments here adduced shall frame a judgment of the things past and not believe rather that they were such as the poets have sung or prose-writers have composed, more delightfully to the ear than conformably to the truth, as being things not to be disproved and by length of time turned for the most part into the nature of fables without credit, but shall think them here searched out by the most evident signs that can be, and sufficiently too, considering their antiquity: he, I say, shall not err. [2]…
History of the Peloponnesian War. Book I, 20-21
https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0247%3Abook%3D1
Great quotes, Geoff, thanks for those.
As James Corbett said recently, history should more apropriately be called his/story. It is usually a story written by the victor, but is (most of the time, actually) not necesarily true.
I concluded that myself a long time ago but have since revised it to being the story that we are subjected to by those who claim to be the victors. There is more to it than that tho, but I have too much on my plate at the moment to explain.
Thank you for this post, Tereza. I will copy the entire text and store it offline for future reference.
I appreciate that. It's an honor to be in your library of offline references.
For all we know the entire www could be taken down at any given moment. Nothing is safe there. Imagine all the people round the world who have everything, their entire lives even, in a "cloud". How stupid is that?
You are very perceptive. This is what I continue to do; save ALL the receipts, keep copies. Back up your data 6 different ways. written info is best kept printed out if it's really important. If there is no power, you can't run a computer. But a piece of paper needs no batteries. ;-)
"Back up your data 6 different ways."
To Sunday.
I have a solar cell with a regulator, a giant 12V battery and a 12VDC to 230VAC, 1kW inverter.
...., but yes.... Paper needs no batteries.
BTW, I have also kept a 3G phone. ;-)
...., and I'm not paranoid. I'm just extremely aware and awake. LOL
Hey N, I must say that I am beyond peeved that your superb (as always) contributions were erased over at the Breggins SS. It's everyone's loss. I rarely bother getting angry anymore, but that has me miffed.
Disgusting.
I was able to save copies of the comments that got deleted.
They are part of a very long post I am going to send out by next week. It's on Adolf Eichmann. I'll be presenting what may be the real organizers of the Holocaust.
By the way, I am really enjoying your contributions to these discussions, it's helpful in building a good knowledge base.
I’m looking forward to your take on Adolf Eichman. Especially now that I hear you got deleted from the Breggin’s comments!
"I was able to save copies of the comments that got deleted."
There you go, Nefahotep. Case in point.
Very fun deep dive Tereza!
It all makes me think of what a violent, miserable lot we have been and are.
One has to wonder if we have ever lived in peace. I think not.
I sure hope we can somehow find our way to it now.
But I think it's not going to be by everyone coming together - that seems unlikely.
About the only way this is going to work is if the Shift allows us to create our own realities not subject to the belief systems of others, and the ability to choose to participate in others' realities or not.
The next few decades are going to be interesting as this pans out.
Oh I think it should make you think the opposite, Philip! We've never been a violent, miserable lot when left to our own devices. We had genius ways of getting along and governing ourselves, many of which were developed by women. Except for squabbles over hunting territories, that kept aggressors from exploiting land they didn't care for, we were peaceful. Every one of us comes from an indigenous ancestor somewhere in our heritage--people who were settled and knew how to live in place. That knowledge has been re-placed with a vocabulary, religion, monetary system and politics of conquest. It's not our nature.
Agreed on the next few decades being interesting! And even years, I'm afraid.
Hey, Gary with the horned helmet here:
Happy Almost special day where you once again enjoy being 30something one more time.
Einstein was quoted somewhere stating:
"I don't know what weapons will be used in WWIII, but I'm quite certain WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones."
I love this comment.
Without knowing the context, I had a feeling it was this comment you loved ;-)
"The migration into Khazaria at the end of the first millennium barely precedes 1066, when William the Conqueror seized control of England and brought in large numbers of juiu as they were known in French."
On 25 September that year Harald Godwinson (England) defeated Harald the Harsh Ruler (Norway) at Stamford Bridge. A little more than two weeks later, on 10/14 (I have read somewhere that it was 10/10), the former was defeated at Hastings by William the Conqueror. They usually fought until sundown, so sundown on 10/14/1066 marks the end of the viking era.
Weren't the Normans Norsemen?
There once was a gigantic viking named Rolf. He was so big he could not ride, so he walked.
Walking Rolf took over Normandy. So, yes, the Normans came from vikings. The two Haralds that died in 1066 were the two last viking kings, hence the end of the viking era when Godwinson died.
Hmm. Well this explains why my Viking Helmet is too big for me.....................I guess I purchased the "Rolf" model online thinking I was getting deal. As Tereza referenced once, at least the horns were removable for holding fermented libations.
from my wife, partner, best friend (who now also adores you) … https://www.instagram.com/stories/mendocino_treehouse/3470345303108304509?igsh=MWJrODhvMnF6YnAxcg==
What a lovely thing to say! However I'm not on instagram so it won't let me see it, but it let me see other thumbnails of hers including the definition of re-gime. I love that!
Just an idea: can what we often describe as *tribal* nature be described as *group narcissism* Or *group sociopathy*?
Hi, Marcus. Yes, I'd say that my thought has developed further since this article. In my most recent, I cite Avigail Abarbanel who refers to Israel, Zionism and Torah-based Judaism as a cult: https://mondoweiss.net/2016/10/why-i-left-the-cult/. Here's my article, based on Guyenot's book: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/from-yahweh-to-zion.
I wouldn't personally describe those who self-identify as Jews as 'tribal' (although perhaps I did, I didn't reread my article). The diaspora is encouraged so as to leverage a global mercantile, media and money power so that 1% of a population can control the other 99%.
And absolutely yes on group sociopathy based on a sociopathic theology, fictional history and group-identity that could certainly be called narcissistic. There are too many quotes to cite supporting that.
"Holy origins Batwoman !" Tereza, a lot of interest in your latest and Brilliant deductions from your exceptional research and gathering of others work on the topic here. What's more interesting are the possibilities that there must be a lil-bit of "Jew" in just about EVERYBODY in America and of course the world. That's my take.
Always a pleasure engaging in your work and introductions to other knowledgeable Authors. Especially like your delivery. Which makes consuming your content so fascinating. Well done.🤩
Thanks so much, Orion! Always a pleasure that you're watching and cogitating ;-)
I was looking for a theme on Russian River (and now I can’t even find where you mentioned that). This is as close as I could get …
• Fort Ross and the Russian-American Company - Russian History Museum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgQxH54mmMI&list=PLJ8uKGwWJKFSuJEWgxSZ5VcgbsN9QCoCk&index=30
(I can’t wait for each new monthly 'Second Saturday' lecture presented by the Russian History Museum)
Enjoy your cruise and break.
That does look like a great series, I can see why you'd be eager for each new release!
Thanks much, just a quick weekend trip starting with a picnic in a garden and a Zen retreat AirBnB. And all three daughters! Yay!
"There is no Aramaic or Hebrew source for the gospels. Even the parables, direct quotes presumed to be from ‘Jesus’ to Judean peasants, use Greek tropes and puns that only make sense in Greek."
I'm pretty ignorant about this (despite having read Burton Mack's "Q" book). But would it be possible that the Greek-speaking writers of the gospels took Q, translated it, and added the miracle stories along with their own spicy Greek puns? Or would they not know Aramaic and hence couldn't read Q? Or maybe they just heard Q via word-of-mouth after it had been told and retold and altered and translated a bunch of times over the years, and never saw it written down?
Or maybe all this is ignorant speculation and the Q hypothesis just a way to prop up the idea of the historical Jesus?
It was a historical Bible scholar who presented at the Jesus Seminars, the international conference of Bible scholars, over a decade ago. I don't have a written copy of it but he blew the whole Q theory out of the water. He was one of a very refined and specialized group of linguists whose focus was on the origins. It was his examples with the parables and quotes that particularly struck me.
So here are the things about Jesus that have been voted inauthentic after lengthy and detailed presentations by the most renowned scholars across the globe: the name (duh), the birth date, the home town of Nazareth, the flight into Egypt and killing of firstborns, the trial by Pontius Pilate, and 85% of all quotes attributed to him. Why? Because they were already documented by other people, mentioned as history things that hadn't happened, or didn't make sense in that language.
Oh and the incident where he goes into a temple in Nazareth, reads from a scroll, they ask him to perform a miracle and then try to throw him off a cliff (no prophet in his home town ...)? There's no archeological evidence of a temple in Nazareth, 99% of people were illiterate so there'd be no scroll, and most importantly--no cliff!
So sure, Mack can devise a whole hypothesis around Q. But first, what are the biographical markers of this person that Q is hypothetically about? That's what I'd like to know.
Tereza, I love the permission at the beginning - no one has to read or follow everything, and you don't have to cater to anyone but your own interests. Brilliant.
I can't quite keep up with all the details...here's what comes up in me in response - my husband is visiting his sister for Passover, bringing our son there. And I have chosen not to go this year. Such a relief. From what I hear, some people make passover quite fun, and one friend tells me its ultimate theme is about freedom and liberation. It's interesting to contemplate that the story of passover is maybe told by the victors rather than the victims. That jews have been treated poorly because of the baseline assumption that their god is the only god, they are the chosen ones, and they are instructed to dominate and enslave all others. So maybe there is truth that other cultures have not liked this group of people, but I also don't like anyone who tries to dominate me. Thanks for bringing good questions and honest explorations to this world!
Thank you, marta, for your generous response. It gets very tricky when it's tied to the personal identities of those we love. I'm going to try to go to the heart of that conflict in my next, so I appreciate your reading of this.
It's also hard to separate the meanings of holidays from the ways we've made them fun. I love Thanksgiving but the reality behind it is horrific. In the show notes for Scrooge, I remember reading that rents were collected once a year in olden times, just before Christmas. So families were evicted and impoverished, leading to lavish feasts and presents for the rich.
Purim celebrates the slaughter of 75,000 people, including women and suckling infants. And the Hebrew Bible says that after the trek through the desert, they invaded Canaan and drove all the people out of their homes. So that's what's being toasted with those lit menorahs.
On the assumptions, Guyenot distinguishes between an inclusive monotheistic god and exclusive supremacist god. It's not that their god is the only one, it's that everyone who's not chosen by that god is no different than an animal. Specifically born to serve the chosen in human form, it says that very explicitly.
But as this article points out, there may be no one who identifies as a Jew whose ancestors survived the slaughter of Judea by the Romans and let into the city by the high priests. The royal lineage and tax collectors hated the Jews, which is what the story of Jesus is about. So it's possible that the highly visible genocide of Canaanites/ Palestinians is being staged to provoke a reaction against the Jews (in Hebrew, with Y for J, Yews or use).
This would help the real perpetrators have a fresh victim shield (Red Shield, Rothschild) to hide behind. So even the instruction to dominate and enslave are ultimately to the benefit of those they serve.
Thanks for sticking with these difficult questions and holding my explorations in good faith!
Just catching up - will browse comments later.
Just ordered Daniel Kristos' book "Priestcraft: Beyond Babylon" after watching several of his episodes including:
• Hellstorm Documentary, and Josephus & Roman Deception? - Ba'al Busters (Daniel Kristos)
https://rumble.com/v4qau7r-hellstorm-documentary-and-josephus-and-roman-deception.html
10:00 – reads from Mike King’s “I Don’t Like Ike”
From 35:30 to 2:16:40 plays Hellstorm documentary by Kyle Hunt / Thomas Goodrich (narrated by Sinead McCarthy)
2:18:25 – Psychedelic Messiah
https://odysee.com/@independentoccupier:5/psychedelic-messiah:f
[Comment:
I have noted a vigorous debate between Karl Haemers (substack Taboo Truth) and Joseph Atwill regarding the alleged [by Atwill] ‘occult roots of Nazism’, so I don’t know what to make of Atwill.
Nevertheless, let me mention Akarya S (D M Murdock) who wrote ‘Christ in Egypt - The Horus-Jesus Connection’, and more importantly, ‘Did Moses Exist? The Myth of the Israelite Lawgiver’.
...
My introduction to Acharya S. (Dorothy Milne Murdock) was via this great two-part interview:
• Awake in our Mythology, The Christ Conspiracy Part 1 - Shadow Walker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOAZ1L-0hgs
• Awake in our Mythology, The Christ Conspiracy Part 2 - Shadow Walker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrBFwhBMgz8]
Priestcraft! What an excellent, novel term to capture an ancient malevolent practice of manipulating entire cultures.
And your recommendation of Hellstorm changed my perspective forever.
Joe Atwill is a friend but I wouldn't base my agreement or disagreement with anyone's research on friendship. I don't know his work on that (oh wait, he did a piece that Mathew Crawford published) but it seems like it coincides with the svastika, colors, Theosophist alliance between Hitler and Madame Blavatsky and royal families.
It seems like we're all in agreement on what was done by the Bolshevik Jews/ Int'l Zionists to Germans in the World Wars and what was NOT done by Germans to Jews. With that, we're probably in the 1% of all people's understanding. The open question is whether Hitler was complicit or not. My question to you is, what difference would it make? As you know, I ask that as an honest question, not a rhetorical one.
I have the Acharya video in a draft, along with some of painstaking progress in producing a transcript from YT's clunky tool, that requires inserting punctuation and capitals, and taking out line breaks every four words. I found it very compelling but also neutral in terms of morality. It presents the substitution of Jesus for Horus as mere mythology, not a ploy by empires and their priests to enmesh sovereign people into their schemes of conquest and domination through taxation and obedience. So, again, it hasn't made it to the top of my 'what difference does it make?' list. But it's pretty close.
"... inserting punctuation and capitals, and taking out line breaks every four words". IKR (I know, right) - and removing the actual timestamps. I have that tedious process down to a fine art. At least YT offers the transcript function which I yearn for in Bitchute, Odysee and Rumble.
More on that other question as we continue on this journey. Even if rhetorical, it requires an answer. The first part of the answer is that finding the truth is a matter of personal liberation - dare I say, deeply spiritual.
Thanks for all the major landmarks and trailblazing.
Oh I can save you one step! You can turn off the timestamps. After you turn the transcript on, there are three dots to the upper right that show 'toggle timestamps.' Viola! I once pronouned that vee-i-ola when rehearsing for a play. What are you going to do, Julius, with all the time I just saved you deleting five characters every four words?
Here's how it translates my name, when I pulled it up to figure this out: Teresa kajio
0:00 timestamps toggled thank you so
0:03 much
0:04 teresa
"Guyenot describes Yahweh as ‘a sociopath among the gods,’ who isn’t monotheistic but supremacist through the bloodthirsty destruction of all other gods, their temples, their followers."
For a full accounting, see "Drunk With Blood: God's Kllings in the Bible":
https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/dwb/TOC.html
I forgot that you recommended this before, Mark, on the Noah story. Great and clever source.
Just a thought on Irish skin colour. Gets red from sunburn easily, generally on the whiter end of the white-skinned spectrum.
IMO most white people are more blotchy pink than white.
Could the Irish have painted red on their skin.
Always interesting to hear about giants. Maybe it just means bigger than Mediterranean men.
Haha, I'm going to put down 'blotchy pink' next time I fill out one of those race questionnaires.
I think the Irish with red hair would be a different theory than the red skin, although I realize I conflated them. Pretty sharp for a rabbit, you are. But that does bring me to my theory on the 'leprosy'! The Irish taken as slaves to the Bahama sugar plantations developed a strange skin pigmentation of dark blotches. If the 'giants' came from Ireland during a time when a membrane held the moisture in, protecting them from the sun and reducing the pull of gravity, the sudden Egyptian sun exposure would have been intense on their skin. Maybe they became like spotted pigs, and that was the prohibition against pork--rather than the pigs carrying leprosy, which doesn't seem to be a thing. Anyway, that's my theory hot off the griddle.
Classy theory you have there Tereza.
No red heifer jokes please.