I find it helps a lot to make sense of how the Romans, Judeans and Ashkenazi are linked to go back to the split in The Kingdom of Israel, which took place around 930 BC, after the death of King Solomon. As you know, the Kingdom split into two parts, North and South:
The Southern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Judah, which was comprised of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin. It contained Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple. It was ruled by the house of David until the fall of Jerusalem in 587 BC.
The Northern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Israel, was composed of the territory of the remaining ten tribes.
The ten so-called “Lost” Tribes of Israel migrated north and west into Anatolia and the Caucasus and beyond to Western Europe.
Some of them became the Trojans and, after their defeat in The Trojan Wars, one group migrated to Etruria and went on to found Rome. A second group, led by Brutus of Troy, went to Britain, where he founded a new nation with its capital at New Troy, now known as London, around 485 BC. In both Etruria and Britain, these migrants were warmly welcomed because some of their ancestors had migrated to both places about a thousand years earlier.
The Romans and the Ancient Britons openly acknowledged their relationship.
An important new book about these migrations was published last month:
“The Great Migrations to Britain of 1527 B.C. and 485 B.C.,” by Marchell Abrahams
As R W Morgan tells us in his “History of Britain From The Flood To AD 700” (1848): “The descent of the British People from Troy and the Trojans was never disputed for fifteen hundred years (ie, until the Hanoverian Accession). The "Island of Brutus" was the common name of the Island in old times. The word tan is the old British or Japhetic term for land,—Brutannia (pronounced Britannia, the British u being sounded as ë) is Brut's or Brutus' Land. The term is also of very ancient use in Asia, as Laristan, Feristan, Affghanistan. The only two national names acknowledged by the Ancient Britons are Kymry, and Y Lin Troia, the race of Troy.”
So, in AD 70, the Romans had a thousand-year-old axe to grind with the Judeans?
I would also mention that I have long wondered whether, when the Khazar king was forced to adopt one of the three Abrahamic religions, he chose Judaism because he knew the Khazars - or the Khazar kings at least - were descendants of the “Lost” Ten Tribes.
This is how Morgan begins the Introduction to his book (page 2) about the descendants of Gomer:
"THE history of the great Gomeric or Kimbric race constitutes the grandest drama of old or modern times. It is the primogenital family of mankind; and as such we find its various divisions established under the same or very slightly modified names in different countries in the earliest dawn of tradition and letters. Around the shores of the Black Sea, they were known as Cimmerioi; in Caucasus, Armenia and Bactria, as Gomarai; in the Baltic, Chersonese, and Scandinavia, as Cimbri; in Italy, as Chumbri or Umbri; in Britain, as the Kymry (The modern Welsh word for “Wales” is “Cymru.”) From them have sprung the nations which have led and still lead the destinies of civilization—the Persian and Parthian in ancient Asia—the Roman in Italy—the Norman of the medieval—the Briton of the present era. Of this family, the Keltic race of France, Spain, and Ireland, are the junior branches. "The Kelts are acknowledged," states Diodorus Siculus, "to be a very ancient people—they are nevertheless but, the children of the Kimbri." To write the annals of the whole Gomeric family of nations, would far exceed the powers of one life. Touching only when the subject imperatively demanded it on the history of the other branches, this little volume gives merely the leading incidents in that of the oldest—the Kymry of our island.”
hola, tereza. again, very very interesting. and is there something in the air around us focused on dismantling the stories of jew and bible? (clif high has called it the age of hyper-novelty or, by old language, the great apocalypse when all the lies are revealed.) anyway, earlier tonight i listened to most of jasun's podcast with kevin barrett and his pretty detailed look at some other aspects of the fakery of the jewish 'experience' narrative. and some of the possible psy-op stuff around the story-making elements of the holocaust and the land of the jews as self made scapegoats to continue the jewish experience psy-op. fascinating stuff, really. the discussion included casual reference to the well established (well known?) role of the zionists in the assassination of jfk and 9/11. (new to me.) if curious: https://childrenofjob.substack.com/p/jobcast-24-a-primordial-persecution
i don't have enough knowledge to refute or confirm what was discussed and so that now becomes another rabbit warren to explore at some point. i'll see how synchronicities guide that search — and it seems between you and jasun, that is starting to get deeper.
as you know i too like etymology and the canaan baal etymology of cannibal raised my eyebrows. and, of course, i checked that out by looking at some other dictionaries and their etymological references. not canaan baal, of course. one of the question marks the 'official' etymology raises is that their sources point to the first usage of cannibal' quite late, 1541 per webster. so.... has this word history been jigged to suit its etymology being 'from Spanish Caníbal, from Taino Caniba,' to keep it away from canaan baal? i confess to 'liking' the canaan baal root, although now i simply don't know and won't take the time to research for earlier usages of something akin to canaan baal before 1541.
and thank you for highlighting that 'religious' narcissistic gaslighting very clearly predates my idea that the roman catholic narrative was likewise narcissistic gaslighting, ie the creation of a false and highly controlled narrative that must be believed in order to be welcomed to the group. religion is, it seems, a rather clever spelling of 'being tied to the ruler'. wow! jung with his deep knowledge of language cites religion as being 're-ligio' tied back. however the official etymologies have a peculiar flavour to them about being studious and re-re-reading repeatedly. however, when i dug down through the links in wiktionary, for example, the etymology does get back to jung's etymology:
Etymology 2
From Proto-Indo-European *leyǵ- (“to bind”).[1]
jung took that as grounding people to the earth. now i wonder, if what was meant was to bind people to narcissistic gaslighting lies.
so much to think about and consider. fascinating stuff. i'm still digesting this. i was at best a very marginal bible dabbler. gracias.
The pictures of the five African women remind me of a quote. During "negotiations" Gamal Abdel Nasser was asked if he trusted the Israelis. His answer?
"They left here (Egypt) as black, and they returned (to the M.E.) as white..........., so, no, I don't trust them.
I wrote "negotiations" because the Israeli government never negotiate in good faith.
By accident, whilst on another substack, I fell upon author, Ralph Ellis. This is the website edfu-books.uk He has written extensively and has several series of books on why so many of the famous biblical characters are missing from the historical record. Never having an inkling, prior to Covid, that most of history is wrong, I'm tempted to start finding out.
It all makes me think of what a violent, miserable lot we have been and are.
One has to wonder if we have ever lived in peace. I think not.
I sure hope we can somehow find our way to it now.
But I think it's not going to be by everyone coming together - that seems unlikely.
About the only way this is going to work is if the Shift allows us to create our own realities not subject to the belief systems of others, and the ability to choose to participate in others' realities or not.
The next few decades are going to be interesting as this pans out.
"The migration into Khazaria at the end of the first millennium barely precedes 1066, when William the Conqueror seized control of England and brought in large numbers of juiu as they were known in French."
On 25 September that year Harald Godwinson (England) defeated Harald the Harsh Ruler (Norway) at Stamford Bridge. A little more than two weeks later, on 10/14 (I have read somewhere that it was 10/10), the former was defeated at Hastings by William the Conqueror. They usually fought until sundown, so sundown on 10/14/1066 marks the end of the viking era.
"Holy origins Batwoman !" Tereza, a lot of interest in your latest and Brilliant deductions from your exceptional research and gathering of others work on the topic here. What's more interesting are the possibilities that there must be a lil-bit of "Jew" in just about EVERYBODY in America and of course the world. That's my take.
Always a pleasure engaging in your work and introductions to other knowledgeable Authors. Especially like your delivery. Which makes consuming your content so fascinating. Well done.🤩
"There is no Aramaic or Hebrew source for the gospels. Even the parables, direct quotes presumed to be from ‘Jesus’ to Judean peasants, use Greek tropes and puns that only make sense in Greek."
I'm pretty ignorant about this (despite having read Burton Mack's "Q" book). But would it be possible that the Greek-speaking writers of the gospels took Q, translated it, and added the miracle stories along with their own spicy Greek puns? Or would they not know Aramaic and hence couldn't read Q? Or maybe they just heard Q via word-of-mouth after it had been told and retold and altered and translated a bunch of times over the years, and never saw it written down?
Or maybe all this is ignorant speculation and the Q hypothesis just a way to prop up the idea of the historical Jesus?
Tereza, I love the permission at the beginning - no one has to read or follow everything, and you don't have to cater to anyone but your own interests. Brilliant.
I can't quite keep up with all the details...here's what comes up in me in response - my husband is visiting his sister for Passover, bringing our son there. And I have chosen not to go this year. Such a relief. From what I hear, some people make passover quite fun, and one friend tells me its ultimate theme is about freedom and liberation. It's interesting to contemplate that the story of passover is maybe told by the victors rather than the victims. That jews have been treated poorly because of the baseline assumption that their god is the only god, they are the chosen ones, and they are instructed to dominate and enslave all others. So maybe there is truth that other cultures have not liked this group of people, but I also don't like anyone who tries to dominate me. Thanks for bringing good questions and honest explorations to this world!
I have noted a vigorous debate between Karl Haemers (substack Taboo Truth) and Joseph Atwill regarding the alleged [by Atwill] ‘occult roots of Nazism’, so I don’t know what to make of Atwill.
Nevertheless, let me mention Akarya S (D M Murdock) who wrote ‘Christ in Egypt - The Horus-Jesus Connection’, and more importantly, ‘Did Moses Exist? The Myth of the Israelite Lawgiver’.
...
My introduction to Acharya S. (Dorothy Milne Murdock) was via this great two-part interview:
• Awake in our Mythology, The Christ Conspiracy Part 1 - Shadow Walker
"Guyenot describes Yahweh as ‘a sociopath among the gods,’ who isn’t monotheistic but supremacist through the bloodthirsty destruction of all other gods, their temples, their followers."
For a full accounting, see "Drunk With Blood: God's Kllings in the Bible":
This is amazing Tereza! I don’t know how you manage to read between the lies of the bible so well!
I’m also impressed with how Rhonda (Wildrhody) comes up with the symbolism of the J hooking the speaker’s cheek. She sees so much that would go right over my head. Rhonda, if you read this, does that concept of the J also apply to other J- words/names or only the ones in relation to Judaism/bible?
Wow - great post, Tereza! Thank you.
I find it helps a lot to make sense of how the Romans, Judeans and Ashkenazi are linked to go back to the split in The Kingdom of Israel, which took place around 930 BC, after the death of King Solomon. As you know, the Kingdom split into two parts, North and South:
The Southern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Judah, which was comprised of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin. It contained Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple. It was ruled by the house of David until the fall of Jerusalem in 587 BC.
The Northern Kingdom, called the Kingdom of Israel, was composed of the territory of the remaining ten tribes.
The ten so-called “Lost” Tribes of Israel migrated north and west into Anatolia and the Caucasus and beyond to Western Europe.
Some of them became the Trojans and, after their defeat in The Trojan Wars, one group migrated to Etruria and went on to found Rome. A second group, led by Brutus of Troy, went to Britain, where he founded a new nation with its capital at New Troy, now known as London, around 485 BC. In both Etruria and Britain, these migrants were warmly welcomed because some of their ancestors had migrated to both places about a thousand years earlier.
The Romans and the Ancient Britons openly acknowledged their relationship.
An important new book about these migrations was published last month:
“The Great Migrations to Britain of 1527 B.C. and 485 B.C.,” by Marchell Abrahams
https://williamcongreve.co.uk/books/p3qeyjknbrkd6bmk/the-great-migrations-to-britain-of-1527-bc-and-485-bc/
As R W Morgan tells us in his “History of Britain From The Flood To AD 700” (1848): “The descent of the British People from Troy and the Trojans was never disputed for fifteen hundred years (ie, until the Hanoverian Accession). The "Island of Brutus" was the common name of the Island in old times. The word tan is the old British or Japhetic term for land,—Brutannia (pronounced Britannia, the British u being sounded as ë) is Brut's or Brutus' Land. The term is also of very ancient use in Asia, as Laristan, Feristan, Affghanistan. The only two national names acknowledged by the Ancient Britons are Kymry, and Y Lin Troia, the race of Troy.”
So, in AD 70, the Romans had a thousand-year-old axe to grind with the Judeans?
I would also mention that I have long wondered whether, when the Khazar king was forced to adopt one of the three Abrahamic religions, he chose Judaism because he knew the Khazars - or the Khazar kings at least - were descendants of the “Lost” Ten Tribes.
This is how Morgan begins the Introduction to his book (page 2) about the descendants of Gomer:
"THE history of the great Gomeric or Kimbric race constitutes the grandest drama of old or modern times. It is the primogenital family of mankind; and as such we find its various divisions established under the same or very slightly modified names in different countries in the earliest dawn of tradition and letters. Around the shores of the Black Sea, they were known as Cimmerioi; in Caucasus, Armenia and Bactria, as Gomarai; in the Baltic, Chersonese, and Scandinavia, as Cimbri; in Italy, as Chumbri or Umbri; in Britain, as the Kymry (The modern Welsh word for “Wales” is “Cymru.”) From them have sprung the nations which have led and still lead the destinies of civilization—the Persian and Parthian in ancient Asia—the Roman in Italy—the Norman of the medieval—the Briton of the present era. Of this family, the Keltic race of France, Spain, and Ireland, are the junior branches. "The Kelts are acknowledged," states Diodorus Siculus, "to be a very ancient people—they are nevertheless but, the children of the Kimbri." To write the annals of the whole Gomeric family of nations, would far exceed the powers of one life. Touching only when the subject imperatively demanded it on the history of the other branches, this little volume gives merely the leading incidents in that of the oldest—the Kymry of our island.”
https://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/More%2016%20History%20of%20Britain%20%20by%20R%20W%20MORGAN%20(1848)%20(2).pdf
hola, tereza. again, very very interesting. and is there something in the air around us focused on dismantling the stories of jew and bible? (clif high has called it the age of hyper-novelty or, by old language, the great apocalypse when all the lies are revealed.) anyway, earlier tonight i listened to most of jasun's podcast with kevin barrett and his pretty detailed look at some other aspects of the fakery of the jewish 'experience' narrative. and some of the possible psy-op stuff around the story-making elements of the holocaust and the land of the jews as self made scapegoats to continue the jewish experience psy-op. fascinating stuff, really. the discussion included casual reference to the well established (well known?) role of the zionists in the assassination of jfk and 9/11. (new to me.) if curious: https://childrenofjob.substack.com/p/jobcast-24-a-primordial-persecution
i don't have enough knowledge to refute or confirm what was discussed and so that now becomes another rabbit warren to explore at some point. i'll see how synchronicities guide that search — and it seems between you and jasun, that is starting to get deeper.
as you know i too like etymology and the canaan baal etymology of cannibal raised my eyebrows. and, of course, i checked that out by looking at some other dictionaries and their etymological references. not canaan baal, of course. one of the question marks the 'official' etymology raises is that their sources point to the first usage of cannibal' quite late, 1541 per webster. so.... has this word history been jigged to suit its etymology being 'from Spanish Caníbal, from Taino Caniba,' to keep it away from canaan baal? i confess to 'liking' the canaan baal root, although now i simply don't know and won't take the time to research for earlier usages of something akin to canaan baal before 1541.
and thank you for highlighting that 'religious' narcissistic gaslighting very clearly predates my idea that the roman catholic narrative was likewise narcissistic gaslighting, ie the creation of a false and highly controlled narrative that must be believed in order to be welcomed to the group. religion is, it seems, a rather clever spelling of 'being tied to the ruler'. wow! jung with his deep knowledge of language cites religion as being 're-ligio' tied back. however the official etymologies have a peculiar flavour to them about being studious and re-re-reading repeatedly. however, when i dug down through the links in wiktionary, for example, the etymology does get back to jung's etymology:
Etymology 2
From Proto-Indo-European *leyǵ- (“to bind”).[1]
jung took that as grounding people to the earth. now i wonder, if what was meant was to bind people to narcissistic gaslighting lies.
so much to think about and consider. fascinating stuff. i'm still digesting this. i was at best a very marginal bible dabbler. gracias.
The pictures of the five African women remind me of a quote. During "negotiations" Gamal Abdel Nasser was asked if he trusted the Israelis. His answer?
"They left here (Egypt) as black, and they returned (to the M.E.) as white..........., so, no, I don't trust them.
I wrote "negotiations" because the Israeli government never negotiate in good faith.
By accident, whilst on another substack, I fell upon author, Ralph Ellis. This is the website edfu-books.uk He has written extensively and has several series of books on why so many of the famous biblical characters are missing from the historical record. Never having an inkling, prior to Covid, that most of history is wrong, I'm tempted to start finding out.
Thank you for this post, Tereza. I will copy the entire text and store it offline for future reference.
Very fun deep dive Tereza!
It all makes me think of what a violent, miserable lot we have been and are.
One has to wonder if we have ever lived in peace. I think not.
I sure hope we can somehow find our way to it now.
But I think it's not going to be by everyone coming together - that seems unlikely.
About the only way this is going to work is if the Shift allows us to create our own realities not subject to the belief systems of others, and the ability to choose to participate in others' realities or not.
The next few decades are going to be interesting as this pans out.
"The migration into Khazaria at the end of the first millennium barely precedes 1066, when William the Conqueror seized control of England and brought in large numbers of juiu as they were known in French."
On 25 September that year Harald Godwinson (England) defeated Harald the Harsh Ruler (Norway) at Stamford Bridge. A little more than two weeks later, on 10/14 (I have read somewhere that it was 10/10), the former was defeated at Hastings by William the Conqueror. They usually fought until sundown, so sundown on 10/14/1066 marks the end of the viking era.
"Holy origins Batwoman !" Tereza, a lot of interest in your latest and Brilliant deductions from your exceptional research and gathering of others work on the topic here. What's more interesting are the possibilities that there must be a lil-bit of "Jew" in just about EVERYBODY in America and of course the world. That's my take.
Always a pleasure engaging in your work and introductions to other knowledgeable Authors. Especially like your delivery. Which makes consuming your content so fascinating. Well done.🤩
I was looking for a theme on Russian River (and now I can’t even find where you mentioned that). This is as close as I could get …
• Fort Ross and the Russian-American Company - Russian History Museum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgQxH54mmMI&list=PLJ8uKGwWJKFSuJEWgxSZ5VcgbsN9QCoCk&index=30
(I can’t wait for each new monthly 'Second Saturday' lecture presented by the Russian History Museum)
Enjoy your cruise and break.
"There is no Aramaic or Hebrew source for the gospels. Even the parables, direct quotes presumed to be from ‘Jesus’ to Judean peasants, use Greek tropes and puns that only make sense in Greek."
I'm pretty ignorant about this (despite having read Burton Mack's "Q" book). But would it be possible that the Greek-speaking writers of the gospels took Q, translated it, and added the miracle stories along with their own spicy Greek puns? Or would they not know Aramaic and hence couldn't read Q? Or maybe they just heard Q via word-of-mouth after it had been told and retold and altered and translated a bunch of times over the years, and never saw it written down?
Or maybe all this is ignorant speculation and the Q hypothesis just a way to prop up the idea of the historical Jesus?
Tereza, I love the permission at the beginning - no one has to read or follow everything, and you don't have to cater to anyone but your own interests. Brilliant.
I can't quite keep up with all the details...here's what comes up in me in response - my husband is visiting his sister for Passover, bringing our son there. And I have chosen not to go this year. Such a relief. From what I hear, some people make passover quite fun, and one friend tells me its ultimate theme is about freedom and liberation. It's interesting to contemplate that the story of passover is maybe told by the victors rather than the victims. That jews have been treated poorly because of the baseline assumption that their god is the only god, they are the chosen ones, and they are instructed to dominate and enslave all others. So maybe there is truth that other cultures have not liked this group of people, but I also don't like anyone who tries to dominate me. Thanks for bringing good questions and honest explorations to this world!
Just catching up - will browse comments later.
Just ordered Daniel Kristos' book "Priestcraft: Beyond Babylon" after watching several of his episodes including:
• Hellstorm Documentary, and Josephus & Roman Deception? - Ba'al Busters (Daniel Kristos)
https://rumble.com/v4qau7r-hellstorm-documentary-and-josephus-and-roman-deception.html
10:00 – reads from Mike King’s “I Don’t Like Ike”
From 35:30 to 2:16:40 plays Hellstorm documentary by Kyle Hunt / Thomas Goodrich (narrated by Sinead McCarthy)
2:18:25 – Psychedelic Messiah
https://odysee.com/@independentoccupier:5/psychedelic-messiah:f
[Comment:
I have noted a vigorous debate between Karl Haemers (substack Taboo Truth) and Joseph Atwill regarding the alleged [by Atwill] ‘occult roots of Nazism’, so I don’t know what to make of Atwill.
Nevertheless, let me mention Akarya S (D M Murdock) who wrote ‘Christ in Egypt - The Horus-Jesus Connection’, and more importantly, ‘Did Moses Exist? The Myth of the Israelite Lawgiver’.
...
My introduction to Acharya S. (Dorothy Milne Murdock) was via this great two-part interview:
• Awake in our Mythology, The Christ Conspiracy Part 1 - Shadow Walker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOAZ1L-0hgs
• Awake in our Mythology, The Christ Conspiracy Part 2 - Shadow Walker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrBFwhBMgz8]
"Guyenot describes Yahweh as ‘a sociopath among the gods,’ who isn’t monotheistic but supremacist through the bloodthirsty destruction of all other gods, their temples, their followers."
For a full accounting, see "Drunk With Blood: God's Kllings in the Bible":
https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/dwb/TOC.html
Just a thought on Irish skin colour. Gets red from sunburn easily, generally on the whiter end of the white-skinned spectrum.
IMO most white people are more blotchy pink than white.
Could the Irish have painted red on their skin.
Always interesting to hear about giants. Maybe it just means bigger than Mediterranean men.
This is amazing Tereza! I don’t know how you manage to read between the lies of the bible so well!
I’m also impressed with how Rhonda (Wildrhody) comes up with the symbolism of the J hooking the speaker’s cheek. She sees so much that would go right over my head. Rhonda, if you read this, does that concept of the J also apply to other J- words/names or only the ones in relation to Judaism/bible?
Wonderful article. Thank you!