I think a huge part of the relief people felt was knowing they were not alone in rejecting the party of war, censorship, and gender insanity. After the media made it seem like all the deplorables were fringe crazies this was a big refutation of that.... I mean, he got the popular vote not just the electoral college. As for the rest, it's a crap shoot right now I think. Fat lady has yet to sing. We'll see. But I like Bobby being there even if they all seem to be Israel's poodles... which is not MAGA in my opinion. 💕
I'd like your advice on something, Heather. My neighbors on the block are all liberals. Lovely people, I get along with them just fine if I keep my mouth shut. My neighbor across the street had the first open house for Obama's first inauguration in 2009. They had a banner that read 'Hope and Change' I had one that said 'Torture is Wrong.' I had no hope for change because Obama golfed while Gaza burned, saying he couldn't do anything until he was President ... oh, except bail out the bankers. So I took his promise that the first thing he would do was shut down Guantanamo with a shaker of salt. I did a radio episode called The Inauguphoria.
During 'covid' they did weekly WOW--Wednesdays on Walnut, sitting in lawn chairs six feet apart in the driveway wearing masks. I attended some but had my rowdy Unmasked Underground Raw Milk distribution in my driveway the same day, so missed most. They're very sweet.
Now they just emailed this "I heard an interesting PODcast earlier this week. It stressed the value of community in the upcoming wackadoodle times. I’m hoping that we can begin to meet again on a regular basis. I’m proposing a monthly potluck that we can rotate hosting in our homes, with weather and winter coming!"
I'm debating an offer to represent the other side in a Q&A. Make it clear that I'm often representing them TO the other side, and ask if they'd like to understand better why thoughtful, well informed people voted for Trump.
Would I be burning my bridges? I've lived here 37 years. Could I pull this off or would it be instant ostracization? What do you think?
I don't live there or around libs so hard for me to know. Our county hates the government and votes red all the time. Also I'm conflict avoidant and introverted so not very social. You seem able to remain calm in the face of attack so would probably be able to handle it better than anyone I know. I guess it would depend on how much you want to remain friendly with neighbors who potentially might not be so friendly if they thought you were going against the herd. I realize this is zero help. Sorry!
On the other hand, the one thing about this that Libs do seem to understand is that war is evil so maybe start with that. Trump has been anti war for decades and he kept his promise about that. That one is huge with Gen Z from what I understand...
I think you have a good chance of doing your Q&A without becoming a leper, if you make it clear that you are a kind of go-between or mediator who isn't taking sides.
If you actually had voted for Trump, and tried to explain why, things could get bad pretty quickly, I suspect, because then their rage would now have a real target (you) instead of a vague basket of deplorables somewhere in flyover country. I could be wrong, though. It's just a hunch based on what I learned during the Scamdemic about the way people dealt with disagreements about masks, vaccines, lockdowns, etc.
One thing that is not factored in during this election, popular-vote-wise? Many disgusted 'liberals' (am I one? I don't think so - but I subscribe to NO political party) either didn't vote at all in this election (dumbass IMO, since local elections are where it counts) - or we voted for any other party but the Uniparty duopoly. I would like to see us think of each other as people first - i read a lot of thoughtful, balanced posts and comments from Trump voters and supporters. Haters gonna hate, on both 'sides' of politics. Until we understand who and what really owns us all, I don't see how any real change has a chance. The overlords want us to war with someone - anyone - including each other. I won't play. I live in a liberal enclave. I am careful to speak truth how I see it without making anyone bad or wrong for theirs. Seems to work, and invites dialogue with thinking liberals and conservatives. Gotta admit, it's exhausting though. Introvert here too. And I get impatient with my own and others' snap judgments and saviorism. None of us knows the absolute truth. Some of us want to find out as much of it as we can. Those are my people.
Well put, "None of us knows the absolute truth. Some of us want to find out as much of it as we can." Those are my people too and here on Substack is where I've found more than I ever thought existed, including all of you.
I am one of those dumbasses. Local politics is another circle of hell, imo. The squabbling over local issues sucks all the air out of the room so there's nothing left for questions like 'Why do the banks own all of the houses and our labor for free?' While they debate a soda tax, the oligarchs are stealing everything nailed down and the nails too.
It is exhausting. I need to give some thought as to whether I want to be a face for them to vent their scorn and rage. But maybe I do because how else are they going to get past it?
I can’t help feeling that the reason the US election was choreographed to be ‘stolen’ in 2020, with all that drama, was that those who decide, had decided that Trump had to be appointed/anointed in 2024 to facilitate their plans for 2027. (Apparently 2027 is a significant milestone in the Hebrew calendar.) Therefore they had to have him sit out a term while whipping up all that ‘patriotic fervour’ and setting up the scenario where anything other than Harris/Biden felt like relief.
Very funny, very politically astute article. I'd tell Rurik directly, but he does that paid sub thing. So interesting about 2027! I hadn't heard that before. Rurik's data on 25M missing Democrat voters is enlightening. Once again, numbers that are readily available but no one bothers to look at. It seems likely what he's saying, those 25M were created so there could be 4 yrs of blatant mismanagement with someone other than Trump to blame, fueling outrage. I didn't realize he called the J6ers insurrectionists. Thanks again, this is the best article I've read on it.
Yes, I have to accept that he only allows comments from paid subscribers - my finger has been on that button several times but then I probably wouldn't be able to keep up anyway.
The observation that concerned me most (although not explicitly in Rurik's article) was that Putin seemed to promote the fake ear assassination narrative and lauded Trump's 'courageous' behaviour. That stunned me.
Well, whatever else he may or may not be, Putin is a strategist. Trump, just before this election, pledged support to Netanyahu, and he wants Israel to end the war with a 'decisive victory' over Palestine - which - to my understanding, would mean scorched earth and no survivors - or kick them all out of the last remaining vestiges of the land they were supposed to have but never really did after the Geneva Accord. Netanyahu also wants us to help Israel go to war with Iran (The US seems to want to war with Idan too), forcing more countries to be involved in a potential nuclear war tinderbox when the nuclear clock is the closest to midnight (endgame) than it's ever been. That may have something to do with it because... really... who in their right mind wants global nuclear war?
Fascinating: "... those who decide, had decided that Trump had to be appointed/anointed in 2024 to facilitate their plans for 2027. (Apparently 2027 is a significant milestone in the Hebrew calendar.)"
MIght you point us to good source(s) for the significance of 2027?
And thank you, Jerome. I don't actually use twitter and although I am aware of Adam Green, I only encounter him occasionally and incidentally on Odysee or Rumble (I forget which). There is only so much content that one can absorb.
• RFK Jr to “Lock Him (Fauci) Up”. Surely Jr’s book on Fauci provides the backbone for a slam-dunk case (or will this be another “Lock Her Up” but let’s not – because she/he has been such a great American).
• Remove from all positions of power (including punishment and reparations) those affiliated with the 911 terrorists (not to mention justice for the survivors of the USS Liberty and their families).
Oh your name came up yesterday. I read an article recommended by Mark Elsis on Earth Newsletter: https://anthonyjhall.substack.com/p/on-the-condemnation-of-holocaust. I commented and got a very nice reply from Tony. In our conversation, he wrote, "I think Julius Scollafish sent me a link to something you did when I was getting warmed up on Substack. My friend, Kevin Barrett (truthjihad) translated From Yahweh to Zion into English."
I love your idea of bioregions and the number nine. Funny but that aligns with the template I constructed where we have 9 bioregions, based on similar bio/geographical similarities (for example areas with lots of water and areas with little water) Turns out the indigenous tribes had maps like this somewhat. It just makes sense, that's why. I didn't put a number for villages or hamlets as they would form themselves and the number doesn't matter in my view, the more the merrier of these because we need to keep small numbers as much as possible when it comes down to the local level.
Still chuckling over your term "got a matso ball's chance in hell". That's a ripper. It is weird and evil that Israel has so much sway though.
Though I am also affected by the current euphoria or relief of Trump's win and his vowing to crack down on censorship (though it's a real red flag that he calls free speech "lawful speech") There must be no qualification for free speech, all speech MUST be free. We can deal with speech we don't like by using more free speech. And if we want to strike an individual off our platform, it must not be done unilaterally, it must go to a vote to the membership. This is how we "safeguard" free speech. It cannot be safeguarded by an individual, that's just poppycock if anyone thinks that.
I feel in my bones that we are being lifted right now with this win, and they will get their day of joy when we are all let down. It intrigues me what they have in store. Who is "they"? The ones who run everything, who know our every psychological characteristic and who live on loosh and the creation we provide for them. As usual a thoroughly riveting talk! Thank you Tereza.
Yay! Someone else who's willing to play with me! The number 9 had two advantages--it doesn't need two digits to describe it and it's one square surrounded by every square on its periphery, including the diagonals. So every village would be unique to every hamlet, with the eight on its borders. No one would be central and no one stuck on an edge. I see the councils (different ones for different functions so anyone can be part of them) moving around from one to the other, so it's always a different set of people. No hierarchy.
The reason that it needs some arbitrary lines to start the division is that everyone needs to belong somewhere. Everyone needs a home community where they can always return and still participate in the economy, if they haven't made their home elsewhere. And you're right that, as I say, bigger is better for empire but smaller supports sovereignty.
I was just thinking the same thing this morning, that you put so eloquently: "There must be no qualification for free speech, all speech MUST be free. We can deal with speech we don't like by using more free speech."
And please copy your excellent Rumble comment here, denise. And I'll post my reply. That was an important point about the women.
You're describing the organization of the blockchain AI uses to stay in real time as no area or hamlet could successfully operate without communications and transfers of information with the others. It's the same.
Small localized chains of information all connected for ease of access required as the problem or dilemma dictates.
The success of any like structure, be it government or AI blockchain, is reliant on the underlying technology that makes it possible. Exactly like digital currency.
Then the problem of autonomy. If each hamlet was free to create a society of it's majority's liking, would it not be possible to create their own currencies, even a currency favored by citizenship in a specific hamlet or outlaw various religions or sexual orientations?
Would this not, in essence, result in a variation of 15 minute cities where unless the local laws are obeyed, one best avoid entering or leaving? And how would travellers know what the laws governing each hamlet were so as to obey them?
Unless reliance on technology provided the tools to navigate this new kind of "Mall of America".
Also, I've got to say, Trump's statement that "lawful speech" equals free speech is a total lie. I don't know why people can't see this. Lawful speech means speech that is allowed by law, not free speech. So whatever is deemed lawful to say by law can be said and anything falling outside the laws is illegal to say and a criminal act by law. Which can result in arrest and incarceration in prison if found guilty of breaking the law whether one agrees with or is aware of the law or not.
If anyone still believes Elon Musk protects free speech after all the accounts deleted on twitter (I refuse to play the "X" game) then I venture they also still believe neuralink brain implants are a good idea and he strapped a tesla to a rocket with a mannequin in the driver's seat that made it through the Van Allen radiation belts that equal 2000-3000 degrees to rotate in orbit around the big blue ball. Sure. Right.
Trump surrounded himself with medical evil during his first term. Now it's techo evil. That should tell anyone, even dimwits, what's coming. As surely as the bioweapons were released by Trump, so will digital currency and full spectrum techno control be released in the second. That's his function. His job. Why he was selected.
In the meantime, deaths from his first term bioweapon will continue to skyrocket and everyone will forget as the next distraction(s) is enacted. The dead forgotten and the maimed and disabled left on the curb.
Find God. Follow Jesus. Relying on our own understanding hasn't worked.
That's a very interesting analogy, Pirate, I haven't understood how blockchain works. Again, good questions and I always appreciate the opportunity to expand on my model. The whole point of the commonwealths is to have their own currency backed by the mortgages, rather than the banks usurping what should be the exclusive right of gov't. Instead of centralized control, I put control at the smallest unit possible. The community can decide how they want to distribute the credit, which I call carets, but it has to be equal for all commoners--including everyone born there and still residing there. The full details are here: https://www.amazon.com/How-Dismantle-Empire-2020-Vision/dp/1733347607.
Carets are a supplemental credit system for trade within the commonwealth, and aren't subject to sales or income tax, only Soc Sec. Who is considered a commoner would be set by the commonwealth. In Santa Cruz, we're inundated with students (I'm listening to the party next door now), homeless, vacation homes and remote corporate landlords. I'd push to set the residency at 7-8 yrs to be a commoner.
But we would want to include the nearby town that's primarily Latino because it would enable them, who work here, to also live here--instead of the students.
In my hometown of Cumberland, they're trying to attract residents. They would likely include students and new homeowners immediately. It depends what problem you're trying to solve.
By requiring distribution to be equal, according to impartial guidelines of residency, it couldn't discriminate for religion or sexual orientation. But it also allows groups to break off their caret system from the rest if they have a model that better fulfills its function, which is to circulate a maximum number of times within the community--creating new goods and services--before being cashed out for the imperial currency. This can be shown by running it through a computer simulation.
I know that's complicated. It's hard to explain a system in a soundbite. That's why I'm glad I keep getting questions on the specifics because I think the repetition helps to flesh it out.
Thanks for elaborating. I'll take a look at your Amazon link.
I find your idea very interesting. It's been tried in small experiments but never in a larger context as you describe which does lead to complexity, of course.
For instance, there was a successful community in Mexico that became decentralized in all ways and functioned very well within it's own context, but if someone broke a law that was major such as theft of property to violence against others, they were shunned from the community. This could only work if there were somewhere to shun the lawbreakers to and would mean the community is thrusting off it's worst people to other communities in the shunning. It was a problem.
I will look at your model. I'm glad you're out there in the world thinking it up.
Pirate, you made my day! The day's still young but I'll still be counting this as a miracle when I go to sleep. Thanks for your response!
You're bringing up an excellent question. How do we control the behaviors of people over whom we have no jurisdiction without a centralized gov't? That's a major problem now in tribal reservations, where they attract the worst through gambling and drinking, and those men rape with impunity because there's no judicial reach. It also affects all of us through scams that empty bank accounts with no recourse in Nigeria or Russia.
I've given some thought to how a network of commonwealths could solve that, and I think indigenous tribes provide a clue. What they had was collective apologies, expressed in symbolic gifts, to show that they would handle the transgressor appropriately. If the victim's tribe didn't feel that was sufficient, they might declare war.
Let's say you have a voluntary int'l coalition of commonwealths who agree that theft and violence are wrong. Someone from another commonwealth steals or attacks in your commonwealth. Their home community would be expected to take that person back and show they'd taken steps to make sure it would never happen again. Perhaps the bioregion or even the federation (100's of millions) would have responsibility for them.
If this wasn't adequate, because offenses kept coming from people in that region, the entire network of commonwealths would refuse to allow access of people, products or currency for a set amount of time, maybe 6 mos. I wouldn't make that a binding agreement, but a voluntary intent to be decided commonwealth by commonwealth.
Does this apply to how federations treat their own people? If Liberia has fourth generation slavery, including children, in their rubber plantations, do I still buy Firestone tires for my school buses, since they're cheapest? I think that's perhaps a different network of voluntary commonwealths.
But I think it's important that prisons don't become an industry that inflicts the lawbreakers on impoverished communities--as happens in my hometown. The communities who are creating the problems--generally inflicted on them by the oligarch system--have to be responsible for the consequences. And have consequences that force them to take back their own economies and judicial systems.
Providence you should bring up tribal govts. I am a citizen of an American Native Nation that uses gambling as the backbone of it's income and extension of power in the small community I live in which is the headquarters of the Nation whose influence *primarily due to casino monies) extends to the state and even the feds.
We have our own Ambassador in DC. and employ various DC approved bureaucrats in positions of vast tribal influence. Like Sec. of Health from DC who is not a citizen, but came several years (ahem...) prior to covid and implemented the tribal mandates-not-mandates on the tribe. They were coercive in many directions and the Nation profited by their compliance and participation in the coercion. I know firsthand. I WAS working for the Nation at the time and lost my job for speaking out in no uncertain terms for over a year against these policies but primarily against the bioweapons.
I also understand the corruption of the casinos on the Nations and their ties to China thanks to Nixon's deal declaring the Native Tribes their own sovereign nations thus enabling lawful gambling. The Nation I'm a citizen of adores Nixon. He's nearly a god to them. Nuff said.
Today the Nation (I won't name them on the internet as they scrape for mentions of their name, being highly sensitive to public perceptions and online presence...) has been granted many financial advantages for their cooperation with the feds over covid as well as other "perks". One of those recent "perks" has been 100% legal jurisdiction over their own citizens within the tribal boundaries regardless of crime. The tribal boundaries extend for multiple counties within the state where non-citizens of the Nation reside and have nothing to do with reservation boundaries. This is more common than people are aware.
An example I know firsthand is of a non-tribal citizen having his car stolen by a tribal citizen and the owner to this day has no recourse to reclaim his property, the thief has received no trial or punishment (the Nation doesn't have any prisons so they convict no one to prison time...) .
Now this kind of injustice causes all sorts of anger and resentment. To quell, the Nation builds public buildings, bridges, parks and improves sidewalks, etc., to insure cooperation with local government. As well as donations to needy local charities, etc.
What I'm getting at here, as I'm sure you're aware, is how people corrupt one another almost continually. How to prevent this corruption is, IMO, the crux of the biscuit.
We can create all kinds of structures and I think the one you are proposing is an interesting one, but the influences of money and power are difficult to control and are usually conducted behind closed doors in secret.
The motto of the Nation is "to improve the overall lives of the people." They sincerely believe this is what they're doing by selling themselves to China and the feds, etc. Though no citizen receives one slim dime of casino monies (more typical than people think) and instead have been given an ever growing bureaucracy that employs many citizens in lame bureaucratic jobs that don't pay much but offer a lifetime of cronyism and security.
People laud local or decentralized government as some kind of cure all for big government, yet I see no difference except in the fact the little fish only eat even smaller fish. The bigger fish have more of a selection on their menu.
Now it’s biomedical techno enslavement. They will vax wirelessly and they won’t need your consent. And noahide will take care of dissenters, Christ believers or anyone against “the greater good”. OFF with their heads!
I love this dialogue here between you two. same concerns about precision of language and free speech vs lawful speech. Hate speech and hate organizations grew because people tried to mandate against it - which just made the hate grow and mutate into something it might not have. Authoritarian mandates from anyone never work.
That is something. I'm glad to be wrong on that prediction.
I'm relieved Trump won too, truth be told, because it means the agenda is moving forward. I don't want a four-year delay, I want what's coming out in the open.
That's an interesting perspective on the Dems deserving this loss. It resonates with me. It makes me think I should offer to talk with my neighbors, if you read my reply to Heather. This may be a rare time that they're willing to listen.
How is substitute teaching going? I've heard it's brutal.
I also believe a Trump win will squeeze out the zit faster. And yes, at first watching the meltdowns was funny and now, the more I see their hot takes, and the posts for suicide prevention hotlines, and the unimaginable lack of self awareness, the sadder I get. I’m trying to have real conversations with some of my friends. I think they might be slightly more open to conversation especially if one can avoid pouring salt into the wound.
I thought the same thing. I didn’t vote Trump, was tempted to but I still don’t trust the guy even though I like some of those on his team, so I did my usual 3rd party protest vote. But I’m definitely glad the Dems lost, they’re liars and deserved it.
Do you mean the politicians are liars or the voters? On politicians, I agree. On the voters, I think they're lying to themselves but I think the same for those who trust in Trump. I don't think anyone can really lie to you without a way that you're lying to yourself in order to buy into it. The liberal lie is their superiority. That's what I'd like to get my neighbors to see.
Oh, I was definitely taping about Dem politicians and media. Regular Dem citizens are just victims of propaganda, basically all my friends and family are Democrats.
yes to your argument and observations from past and present.
it does seem to me that there is some kind of shifting of energy, perhaps only the psychological zeitgeist, although i think beyond that. and that shift is that with the convid having not succeeded as the ptb were planning — i think way fewer have died than expected and their logistical plans are unable to accommodate the number still living — much more people are awake and no longer are giving the needed energy of trust to support the existing social authoritarian-based structure. (not patriarchal!)
so... trump is the wild card. regardless of what does or doesn't happen, we are in for interesting time. at his core he has the ability to bring people together of diverse talents and abilities. i do think that term 1 was a training session for him and this time it will be more serious. to what extent can he disentangle himself from the money or not? the energy of personal agency moves way beyond the person, and so it will be fascinating to see how that rolls out into the political structure and its functioning. the leadership attuned to that energy can achieve a lot especially in the administrative parts of the government and society.
i have no idea how this will work out. way too many variables at play. and the cabalista are still powerful and now likely getting ready to double down in some way outside of their plans and so are becoming a bit more obvious in their craziness. and that will wake up more and.... [headshake.]
absolutely fascinating times. pass the popcorn!
all the best with what is changing. everything changes. with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
I like your thinking, Guy, that everything's not proceeding according to the plan of the PTB.
Even a wild card is not the player. The fabrications go so deep that I wouldn't be surprised to find his name was chosen for that very analogy. Looking back, his first term set everything in motion and inflicted liberals with TDS, so they would be for everything he was against, and against everything he was for. Then he stepped back and let a senile old man take the blame as it all played out. Now he can be played on any suit and sweep the round. Clever, I'll give them that.
i was thinking similar, that it was important that trump lose in 2020. from a high energetic perspective because when the people of the society are really really really asleep, waking them up isn't just simply a gentle slap on the face. the arrogance of the clintons and the obamas was expressed and fed by them having 'won' that election. imo there is no question the various mockingbird media manipulations, perhaps most significantly although not solely the biden laptop, backed by pretty obvious vote tampering got them in. and the good outcome of that is that their arrogance went into complete hubris. what ever marginal connection they had for the amercian populace was gone. and so for the next for years they spoke from their mountain of hubris and oblivious to the shit coming out of their mouths that was burying themselves. some of the post mortems have been absolutely astonishing, the complete utter total hubristic disrespect still spewing.
why was that good? because it allowed the true extent of their ideological evil — by which i mean to live with a celebration and empowerment anti-life ideologies and actions — to be shown so completely. how did conspiracy sarah say it so well? if you don't see it now, your are complicit. (and that from sarah might be a caution to consider regarding your lib neighbours.)
so... the 4 years of american 'purgatory' was in fact an important wake up call and a powerful call to rouse the 'healthy' anger that wakes us up to taking actions against the contempt of the 'evil ones'; and to turn towards people who are being energised into life, even if by that ostensibly crazy man with the sense of humour who dodged more bullets including a real one that it is possible to imagine; and who is alive and fighting for life. it seems to me that his claim to be not a politician, while correct, is more accurately that he is living in a near perfect alignment with his own personal integration/integrity with the energy of the universe. people who truly live into life their own eccentric self from that place are often perceived poorly, because the inauthentic project onto those people their own shadows. so interesting to see what is happening.
all the best with what is changing. everything changes.
Let me clarify, Guy, you think Trump is "living in a near perfect alignment with his own personal integration/integrity with the energy of the universe"?
yes. he is authentic within himself and so can be irreverent, rude, crude and funny. a great definition of 'enlightenment' is, for example, complete indifference to the opinions of others. so, harris and the dems and surrogates all need scripts and actors to read them and then closed loop feedback confirmation that their virtue signalling is being approvingly heard. and trump absolutely doesn't.
and i love the 'alignment' of the name trump with the humour of the universe! after 35 years of noting and documenting the synchronicities in my life it is their humour that provides the final confirmation of the intelligence of the universe: humour requires intelligence. and so, you have the trump card, the joker, coming in and stomping all over virtue signalling of the democrats! too funny.
and of course, you have the enantiodromia aspect too! in jungian psychology there is the awareness that often people moving towards individuation or away from it experience 'enantiodromia': flipping into what they were not and what they once found alien or repugnant! so, both the dems and the republicans express this so perfectly, although in opposite ways! the dems, having successfully lied about being for the working person and for peace had the mask torn off and exposed themselves as completely indifferent to people and overtly pro-war. (i read this earlier, tonight, synchronistically in yet another 'why i left the left; because the left left me' confession. the writer, at a democratic fund raiser, of which she was one, wrote: 'When you consider what the modern Democratic Party has become, you begin to understand how they lost touch with their base. At the home of a major donor, a billionaire who lives in a mansion overlooking San Francisco Bay, I listened to the speakers hoping to raise funds for the 2022 midterms. Waiters dressed in black with silver trays bounced between wealthy elites. The speakers outlined their strategy for winning the midterms and the 2024 election saying: “We no longer want to win the working class. We don’t need those people anymore. They’re gone forever. The future will be young Latinos and people of color.”' (from 'I Raised $50 Million for the Democrats. This Week, I Voted for Trump.: The Democratic Party turned its back on me and my family long before I turned my back on it' https://www.thefp.com/p/democrat-fundraiser-evan-barker-i-voted-trump).)
so, trump as the wild card actually represents to a 't', maybe, what i mean when i express the idea of 'appropriate eccentric action': the stoic individuated self, with 'stoic' going back to its original meaning of being unaffected by the opinions of others, not its commonly understood meaning as being cold. so... the wacky billionaire represents the hope of the poor people who want to be themselves as individuals. hence his popularity with everybody! i find this so funny! and of course the dems are supporting robotic simulacrums of cookie cutter humans: no original thought and, at the extreme of that, their absolute desire to neuter everyone they can! and harris actually was the perfect representation of that: devoid of originality and eccentricity. everything scripted, often badly, and usually poorly delivered. (so much so 60 minutes edited her to 'fix' her! lol! omg, so funny!)
have you watched candace owens' series on the family roots of kamela harris? fascinating and likely explains a lot of why she was 'given', ie was picked to be the next token. and why she was 'fake' as i've read people describe her. it turns out that her mother worked at ewan cameron's mk-ultra hospital in montreal for the cia. things that make you go hmmmm. to what extent has harris, who has shown herself really a rather poor human and certainly a poor politician, been 'successful'? by being picked and appointed in various ways as a puppet.
so, yes; trump is the epitome of a stoic, an individuated human, alive at the fullest sense of what that means. an example of that is how he had the 'easy' energy at his age to out perform, physically, emotionally and intellectually, the dems. amazing to watch. and i smiled every time i heard a completely deluded dem criticising him for being weak and incompetent! now that was projection.
now, can he 'clean the swamp'? no idea. what he has done, though, is inspired people to grow. not a small feat. what is happening, in the great apocalypse, of which he is a part, is to stop relying on the opinions of others, even the experts, and to become our own agents. wonderful time! amazing, isn't it? your ideas are likely not all that far away from being realised, as what is happening represents a huge shift in consciousness into maturity and individuated humans.
all the best with what is changing. everything changes!
So ... you think that Trump isn't beholden to the hundreds of $millions from Zionist donors, and doesn't care what they think? Did he choose JD Vance as his own agent or because Elon Musk and Peter Thiel made their huge donations conditional on it? What could Trump do or fail to do, once he's in office, that would make you feel he wasn't authentic, but was playing the part assigned to him? Being rude and crude is, imo, part of the act. His job was to offend liberals so much they'd be for anything he was against and against anything he was for. It's certainly worked.
that i don't know. on the surface all that you say makes perfect sense and so logically i won't say no.
however, my intuitive feeling is that he isn't. a challenge i have with logical connections, that you describe, is that they certainly 'mean' something. and at the same time synchronistically the meaning might be more than what we're seeing logically — well, mostly, of course, because logic cannot connect to what isn't seen and gets entangled with limited mind viruses more often than not.
it seems to me that the universe — whatever that is! — has a very long end game is one way of putting it. a big part of our current social 'problems', if you want to put it that way, and that you articulate well in this essay and elsewhere, is the monetary debt system being likely controlled by some version of the jq elohim worship cult (as clif high calls them), or the km or the rhaddanite bankers or .... loosely zionists. our social entanglement with it is too big, again as you wrote, for that fall simply be banished as if by magic from an authoritarian top down hero. we've exited the age of the other as hero! and the other as villain.
so.... did the zionists help him? sure. does that mean they control him? hmmmmm. it would seem logical to make that inference and so I won't argue against that logic. my intuition, which has no authority over you and that i use as a signpost not as a truthpost, says not. time will tell. and it could be that four years won't be enough for that to be made clear. or maybe it will depending on how the israel question is addressed. how long is the long game for human emancipation from our being a social structure built on ritual physical, emotional and psychological abuse married to indebtedness as enslavement? no idea. one person at a time and if that is all the trump is able to do, is to inspire one person at a time in a significant way....? well, that might be all that is enough and all his destiny is asking of him.
and i don't think being rude and crude was part of an act, actually. i don't know for sure, although i seem to remember thinking/feeling that he had that kind of offputing rudeness and crudeness with him from before he became a politician. i paid little attention to him until this year. to the best of my remembrance of him from the unavoidable encounters through tv.
note that i am of the opinion that the political structure we are living is a very corrupt theatre and that the money directs the powers. and that money is a very cleverly orchestrated enslavement system, against which my course 'economics debunked' and 'banks skanks' argued. and even funnier for me is that this year it is the first time in about 40 years that i've attended an election, neither in canadian nor the usa! (i even presented a paper at an inquiry in canada on the poor nature of the democratic system where i suggested an alternative which is to remove the money component part of it by going to politician by some kind of delineated jury system - that was in the early 00s when the opposition party was able to get by a small amount the majority of the popular vote and only 3 or 4 of 78 seats in the house.) and, independently of me, it turns out that my sister and her husband have also been attending this more closely than any election in decades. hmmmm.
so, my having become interested in this one is... puzzling to me. (to my sis, too.) i think that there is change in consciousness. some of the spiritual people i respect have made this comment. and my own experiences with how the engagement with people for the last twenty-five years about living the bully language of being in bully stockholm syndrome has changed a huge amount. that is, for me, a tangible measure of that change. as are the comments of people like anneke lucas who was overjoyed that she now has a voice and an audience to her having been a victim of satanic worship rituals of torture and rape. for her that was a huge change in the cultural landscape, that truths were being spoken and heard.
there are lots of 'synchronicities' that point to us being in the beginning of a great apocalypse. so, trump is a part of that in a significant way. i'm curious to see how and what he does. and i do not pin hope or despair on that. simply curiosity, while keeping my eyes open for the synchronicities. they are where we have an opportunity to see/hear/feel the universe talking to us with its very funny jokes. seriously, a trump 'card' as president? rotlf! can't get better than that!
time will tell. all the best with what is changing.
oh good, an easy question! It's only possible by setting your block quote first and then pasting something that already has a block quote in it. Starting from scratch (or a non-Substack source) I don't think it lets you do it. As we've both found, it just takes the block quote off to hit it twice.
Tereza, you talk so much sense. Hopefully I will find time soon to share my own views on DT’s return to the WH. (Just got back into my apartment this week and needing to finish another piece first).
President-Elect Trump just laid out a 10-point plan to unravel the Deep State. (3 min, 40 sec)
1. RESTORE President’s authority to remove rogue bureaucrats.
2. FIRE corrupt actors in National Security and Intelligence apparatus.
3. REFORM FISA courts, which are “so corrupt that the judges seemingly do not care when they are lied to in warrant applications.
4. ESTABLISH Truth and Reconciliation Commission to declassify and publish all documents on Deep State spying, censorship, and corruption.
5. CRACKDOWN on government leakers who collude with the fake news to deliberately weave false narratives and to subvert our government and our democracy.
6. MAKE every Inspector General’s Office independent and physically separated from the departments they oversee.
7. ASK Congress to establish independent auditing system to monitor our intelligence agencies and ensure they are not spying on our citizens or running disinformation campaigns against the American people.
8. MOVE parts of the sprawling federal bureaucracy to new locations outside Washington, «just as I moved the Bureau of Land Management to Colorado.”
9. BAN federal bureaucrats from taking jobs at the companies they deal with and that they regulate, “like with Big Pharma”. (ER: The revolving door phenomena)
10. PUSH for constitutional amendment to impose term limits on members of Congress.
and this definitely sounds worth measuring ...
• 🙌 Trumps Plan to UNLEASH 100+ Ferocious Legal Warriors across America - just a dutch dude
Oh good, I had your article open to read so I'm glad for the reminder. Just to clarify, your position is that there are two actual sides represented at the top. Mine is that there's only one and Trump is part of it. Julius linked the Rurik Skywalker essay above showing that 25M Dem voters were added to the 2020 election results, then disappeared for this one. Biden needed to take the blame for the CovidCon and Ukraine, so Trump could come back with a clean slate of angry voters--at someone else.
Sincerity is a nebulous thing to measure, like Guy's intuition. What I look for are contradictions between what Trump says and what he does. Lee Fang writes about one of his first important appointments of Susie Wiles as Sec't of State:
"Wiles is the co-chair of Mercury Public Affairs, one of the largest lobbying firms in the US. The company counts many clients which are at odds with various aspects of the Trump agenda. Over the last year, its roster has included Kraft Heinz and Nestlé, makers of ultra-processed junk foods that will be at odds with the promised “Make America Healthy Again” reforms of public health agencies. According to forms filed with Congress, Wiles is directly registered as a lobbyist for tobacco firm Swisher International on matters related to “FDA regulations.”
"The client list includes AT&T, Airbnb, eBay, Archer Daniels Midland, and many other corporate giants. However, it may be her company’s extensive foreign lobbying that will raise the most eyebrows.
"Mercury currently represents the state of Qatar, Libya’s national oil company, and three major Chinese corporations: JinkoSolar, Hikvision USA, and Alibaba. The Chinese firms have contended with American tariffs and other restrictions. Hikvision, in particular, has faced enhanced sanctions from the Biden administration over allegations that the company’s surveillance cameras are used for human rights abuses and military purposes."
Along with the MAHA agenda, this seems at odds with Trump's statement that he would stop the 'revolving door' by demanding a 'cooling off period' of 7-8 yrs before someone goes from gov't to a related corporate job. It seems this doesn't work in reverse.
I'm changing my name to Tereza Wet Blanket Coraggio.
Indeed, my perception changes as I go forward. I just kinda present what I have at any given time. It is certainly feasible that it's all the same psyop.
Either way, it does not fare well for us. And as I said in my piece, we will never vote our way out of this. I appreciate your continuing perspective.
I did not know that about Wiles. Very interesting and shoulda known. No wonder she wants to keep a low profile.
First things first I love that top you're wearing!
I'm glad Trump won mainly because it's an irritant that may help push programmed Dems to look outside their usual references. When he disappoints, I hope it does the same to Rep believers who are still avoiding the reality that no 'leader' is gonna fix this mess. So, basically speeding up the unraveling is good! Thanks, T.
I love your priorities! Isn't that top fun? A thrift store find.
You put that so well, Kathleen, no surprise. Around here, people too young to vote are having marches with very garbled signs. I can't quite figure out their gripe. So no looking outside the usual references yet, but I'm still thinking about that message to my neighbors.
I think a huge part of the relief people felt was knowing they were not alone in rejecting the party of war, censorship, and gender insanity. After the media made it seem like all the deplorables were fringe crazies this was a big refutation of that.... I mean, he got the popular vote not just the electoral college. As for the rest, it's a crap shoot right now I think. Fat lady has yet to sing. We'll see. But I like Bobby being there even if they all seem to be Israel's poodles... which is not MAGA in my opinion. 💕
I'd like your advice on something, Heather. My neighbors on the block are all liberals. Lovely people, I get along with them just fine if I keep my mouth shut. My neighbor across the street had the first open house for Obama's first inauguration in 2009. They had a banner that read 'Hope and Change' I had one that said 'Torture is Wrong.' I had no hope for change because Obama golfed while Gaza burned, saying he couldn't do anything until he was President ... oh, except bail out the bankers. So I took his promise that the first thing he would do was shut down Guantanamo with a shaker of salt. I did a radio episode called The Inauguphoria.
During 'covid' they did weekly WOW--Wednesdays on Walnut, sitting in lawn chairs six feet apart in the driveway wearing masks. I attended some but had my rowdy Unmasked Underground Raw Milk distribution in my driveway the same day, so missed most. They're very sweet.
Now they just emailed this "I heard an interesting PODcast earlier this week. It stressed the value of community in the upcoming wackadoodle times. I’m hoping that we can begin to meet again on a regular basis. I’m proposing a monthly potluck that we can rotate hosting in our homes, with weather and winter coming!"
I'm debating an offer to represent the other side in a Q&A. Make it clear that I'm often representing them TO the other side, and ask if they'd like to understand better why thoughtful, well informed people voted for Trump.
Would I be burning my bridges? I've lived here 37 years. Could I pull this off or would it be instant ostracization? What do you think?
I don't live there or around libs so hard for me to know. Our county hates the government and votes red all the time. Also I'm conflict avoidant and introverted so not very social. You seem able to remain calm in the face of attack so would probably be able to handle it better than anyone I know. I guess it would depend on how much you want to remain friendly with neighbors who potentially might not be so friendly if they thought you were going against the herd. I realize this is zero help. Sorry!
On the other hand, the one thing about this that Libs do seem to understand is that war is evil so maybe start with that. Trump has been anti war for decades and he kept his promise about that. That one is huge with Gen Z from what I understand...
I think you have a good chance of doing your Q&A without becoming a leper, if you make it clear that you are a kind of go-between or mediator who isn't taking sides.
If you actually had voted for Trump, and tried to explain why, things could get bad pretty quickly, I suspect, because then their rage would now have a real target (you) instead of a vague basket of deplorables somewhere in flyover country. I could be wrong, though. It's just a hunch based on what I learned during the Scamdemic about the way people dealt with disagreements about masks, vaccines, lockdowns, etc.
Do what's right and let God handle the consequences.
i'm not heather. i do have a suggestion that might allow you to test the waters before diving in. let me know if you are interested.
One thing that is not factored in during this election, popular-vote-wise? Many disgusted 'liberals' (am I one? I don't think so - but I subscribe to NO political party) either didn't vote at all in this election (dumbass IMO, since local elections are where it counts) - or we voted for any other party but the Uniparty duopoly. I would like to see us think of each other as people first - i read a lot of thoughtful, balanced posts and comments from Trump voters and supporters. Haters gonna hate, on both 'sides' of politics. Until we understand who and what really owns us all, I don't see how any real change has a chance. The overlords want us to war with someone - anyone - including each other. I won't play. I live in a liberal enclave. I am careful to speak truth how I see it without making anyone bad or wrong for theirs. Seems to work, and invites dialogue with thinking liberals and conservatives. Gotta admit, it's exhausting though. Introvert here too. And I get impatient with my own and others' snap judgments and saviorism. None of us knows the absolute truth. Some of us want to find out as much of it as we can. Those are my people.
Well put, "None of us knows the absolute truth. Some of us want to find out as much of it as we can." Those are my people too and here on Substack is where I've found more than I ever thought existed, including all of you.
I am one of those dumbasses. Local politics is another circle of hell, imo. The squabbling over local issues sucks all the air out of the room so there's nothing left for questions like 'Why do the banks own all of the houses and our labor for free?' While they debate a soda tax, the oligarchs are stealing everything nailed down and the nails too.
It is exhausting. I need to give some thought as to whether I want to be a face for them to vent their scorn and rage. But maybe I do because how else are they going to get past it?
Nailed it for me with this comment. 🙌🏽
Thanks for condensing all those articles I had bookmarked but had not yet had a chance to peruse.
Here is Rurik Skywalker’s take:
• They Wanted Trump to Win This Time - Someone had to say it. - Rurik Skywalker
https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/they-wanted-trump-to-win-this-time
I can’t help feeling that the reason the US election was choreographed to be ‘stolen’ in 2020, with all that drama, was that those who decide, had decided that Trump had to be appointed/anointed in 2024 to facilitate their plans for 2027. (Apparently 2027 is a significant milestone in the Hebrew calendar.) Therefore they had to have him sit out a term while whipping up all that ‘patriotic fervour’ and setting up the scenario where anything other than Harris/Biden felt like relief.
Very funny, very politically astute article. I'd tell Rurik directly, but he does that paid sub thing. So interesting about 2027! I hadn't heard that before. Rurik's data on 25M missing Democrat voters is enlightening. Once again, numbers that are readily available but no one bothers to look at. It seems likely what he's saying, those 25M were created so there could be 4 yrs of blatant mismanagement with someone other than Trump to blame, fueling outrage. I didn't realize he called the J6ers insurrectionists. Thanks again, this is the best article I've read on it.
Yes, I have to accept that he only allows comments from paid subscribers - my finger has been on that button several times but then I probably wouldn't be able to keep up anyway.
The observation that concerned me most (although not explicitly in Rurik's article) was that Putin seemed to promote the fake ear assassination narrative and lauded Trump's 'courageous' behaviour. That stunned me.
Well, whatever else he may or may not be, Putin is a strategist. Trump, just before this election, pledged support to Netanyahu, and he wants Israel to end the war with a 'decisive victory' over Palestine - which - to my understanding, would mean scorched earth and no survivors - or kick them all out of the last remaining vestiges of the land they were supposed to have but never really did after the Geneva Accord. Netanyahu also wants us to help Israel go to war with Iran (The US seems to want to war with Idan too), forcing more countries to be involved in a potential nuclear war tinderbox when the nuclear clock is the closest to midnight (endgame) than it's ever been. That may have something to do with it because... really... who in their right mind wants global nuclear war?
Yes I fear we are constantly being emotionally manipulated. Going to check out that link!
Fascinating: "... those who decide, had decided that Trump had to be appointed/anointed in 2024 to facilitate their plans for 2027. (Apparently 2027 is a significant milestone in the Hebrew calendar.)"
MIght you point us to good source(s) for the significance of 2027?
I found a copy of the video embedded here: (Adam Green - Know More News clip)
Rabbi announces Hebrew Year 5787 as the ‘absolute deadline for “redemption”' – corresponding to October 2, 2027.
https://biblescienceforum.com/2024/07/26/has-donald-trump-been-selected-as-the-second-non-jewish-messiah-for-israel/comment-page-1/
Thank you. The embed references this twitter thread: https://x.com/Know_More_News/status/1816222530975465564, which contains more videos, etc relevant to this theory.
And thank you, Jerome. I don't actually use twitter and although I am aware of Adam Green, I only encounter him occasionally and incidentally on Odysee or Rumble (I forget which). There is only so much content that one can absorb.
Just a couple more on my imaginary wish list …
• RFK Jr to “Lock Him (Fauci) Up”. Surely Jr’s book on Fauci provides the backbone for a slam-dunk case (or will this be another “Lock Her Up” but let’s not – because she/he has been such a great American).
• Remove from all positions of power (including punishment and reparations) those affiliated with the 911 terrorists (not to mention justice for the survivors of the USS Liberty and their families).
Are you making these wishes on a star, a lucky cricket, or a rabbit's foot? If either of these come true, you can patent your method.
Tell 'im 'e's dreamin' (from The Castle - an Aussie classic)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dik_wnOE4dk
Ah you are dropping clues on where you're from!
Yeah - Spring, and almost time for lunch.
And others have this opinion...
• Donald Trump Is Not Your Friend - Progressive Truth Seekers
https://odysee.com/@ProgressiveTruthSeekers:3/Donald-Trump-Is-Not-Your-Friend:0c
Max Igan would agree ...
• Destabilization - 10/30/24 – Max Igan
https://odysee.com/@thecrowhouse:2/Destabilization:9
or
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1YfTClPUcuRq/
or
https://rumble.com/v5n4ven-destabilization.html
Oh your name came up yesterday. I read an article recommended by Mark Elsis on Earth Newsletter: https://anthonyjhall.substack.com/p/on-the-condemnation-of-holocaust. I commented and got a very nice reply from Tony. In our conversation, he wrote, "I think Julius Scollafish sent me a link to something you did when I was getting warmed up on Substack. My friend, Kevin Barrett (truthjihad) translated From Yahweh to Zion into English."
Thanks for that, Skollafish!
How nice. I resonate completely with Tony Hall - yet again, his experience and ability to articulate provides great leadership and inspiration.
And thanks so much for that link - I was away and offline at that time
I love your idea of bioregions and the number nine. Funny but that aligns with the template I constructed where we have 9 bioregions, based on similar bio/geographical similarities (for example areas with lots of water and areas with little water) Turns out the indigenous tribes had maps like this somewhat. It just makes sense, that's why. I didn't put a number for villages or hamlets as they would form themselves and the number doesn't matter in my view, the more the merrier of these because we need to keep small numbers as much as possible when it comes down to the local level.
Still chuckling over your term "got a matso ball's chance in hell". That's a ripper. It is weird and evil that Israel has so much sway though.
Though I am also affected by the current euphoria or relief of Trump's win and his vowing to crack down on censorship (though it's a real red flag that he calls free speech "lawful speech") There must be no qualification for free speech, all speech MUST be free. We can deal with speech we don't like by using more free speech. And if we want to strike an individual off our platform, it must not be done unilaterally, it must go to a vote to the membership. This is how we "safeguard" free speech. It cannot be safeguarded by an individual, that's just poppycock if anyone thinks that.
I feel in my bones that we are being lifted right now with this win, and they will get their day of joy when we are all let down. It intrigues me what they have in store. Who is "they"? The ones who run everything, who know our every psychological characteristic and who live on loosh and the creation we provide for them. As usual a thoroughly riveting talk! Thank you Tereza.
Yay! Someone else who's willing to play with me! The number 9 had two advantages--it doesn't need two digits to describe it and it's one square surrounded by every square on its periphery, including the diagonals. So every village would be unique to every hamlet, with the eight on its borders. No one would be central and no one stuck on an edge. I see the councils (different ones for different functions so anyone can be part of them) moving around from one to the other, so it's always a different set of people. No hierarchy.
On another post, Tiedye Tiger started by writing, "I want to vote for u" and we ended up playing a lot with my ideas of scaling down to size: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/who-are-you-voting-against/comment/75327344.
The reason that it needs some arbitrary lines to start the division is that everyone needs to belong somewhere. Everyone needs a home community where they can always return and still participate in the economy, if they haven't made their home elsewhere. And you're right that, as I say, bigger is better for empire but smaller supports sovereignty.
I was just thinking the same thing this morning, that you put so eloquently: "There must be no qualification for free speech, all speech MUST be free. We can deal with speech we don't like by using more free speech."
And please copy your excellent Rumble comment here, denise. And I'll post my reply. That was an important point about the women.
You're describing the organization of the blockchain AI uses to stay in real time as no area or hamlet could successfully operate without communications and transfers of information with the others. It's the same.
Small localized chains of information all connected for ease of access required as the problem or dilemma dictates.
The success of any like structure, be it government or AI blockchain, is reliant on the underlying technology that makes it possible. Exactly like digital currency.
Then the problem of autonomy. If each hamlet was free to create a society of it's majority's liking, would it not be possible to create their own currencies, even a currency favored by citizenship in a specific hamlet or outlaw various religions or sexual orientations?
Would this not, in essence, result in a variation of 15 minute cities where unless the local laws are obeyed, one best avoid entering or leaving? And how would travellers know what the laws governing each hamlet were so as to obey them?
Unless reliance on technology provided the tools to navigate this new kind of "Mall of America".
Also, I've got to say, Trump's statement that "lawful speech" equals free speech is a total lie. I don't know why people can't see this. Lawful speech means speech that is allowed by law, not free speech. So whatever is deemed lawful to say by law can be said and anything falling outside the laws is illegal to say and a criminal act by law. Which can result in arrest and incarceration in prison if found guilty of breaking the law whether one agrees with or is aware of the law or not.
If anyone still believes Elon Musk protects free speech after all the accounts deleted on twitter (I refuse to play the "X" game) then I venture they also still believe neuralink brain implants are a good idea and he strapped a tesla to a rocket with a mannequin in the driver's seat that made it through the Van Allen radiation belts that equal 2000-3000 degrees to rotate in orbit around the big blue ball. Sure. Right.
Trump surrounded himself with medical evil during his first term. Now it's techo evil. That should tell anyone, even dimwits, what's coming. As surely as the bioweapons were released by Trump, so will digital currency and full spectrum techno control be released in the second. That's his function. His job. Why he was selected.
In the meantime, deaths from his first term bioweapon will continue to skyrocket and everyone will forget as the next distraction(s) is enacted. The dead forgotten and the maimed and disabled left on the curb.
Find God. Follow Jesus. Relying on our own understanding hasn't worked.
Not. One. Single. Time.
That's a very interesting analogy, Pirate, I haven't understood how blockchain works. Again, good questions and I always appreciate the opportunity to expand on my model. The whole point of the commonwealths is to have their own currency backed by the mortgages, rather than the banks usurping what should be the exclusive right of gov't. Instead of centralized control, I put control at the smallest unit possible. The community can decide how they want to distribute the credit, which I call carets, but it has to be equal for all commoners--including everyone born there and still residing there. The full details are here: https://www.amazon.com/How-Dismantle-Empire-2020-Vision/dp/1733347607.
Carets are a supplemental credit system for trade within the commonwealth, and aren't subject to sales or income tax, only Soc Sec. Who is considered a commoner would be set by the commonwealth. In Santa Cruz, we're inundated with students (I'm listening to the party next door now), homeless, vacation homes and remote corporate landlords. I'd push to set the residency at 7-8 yrs to be a commoner.
But we would want to include the nearby town that's primarily Latino because it would enable them, who work here, to also live here--instead of the students.
In my hometown of Cumberland, they're trying to attract residents. They would likely include students and new homeowners immediately. It depends what problem you're trying to solve.
By requiring distribution to be equal, according to impartial guidelines of residency, it couldn't discriminate for religion or sexual orientation. But it also allows groups to break off their caret system from the rest if they have a model that better fulfills its function, which is to circulate a maximum number of times within the community--creating new goods and services--before being cashed out for the imperial currency. This can be shown by running it through a computer simulation.
I know that's complicated. It's hard to explain a system in a soundbite. That's why I'm glad I keep getting questions on the specifics because I think the repetition helps to flesh it out.
Thanks for elaborating. I'll take a look at your Amazon link.
I find your idea very interesting. It's been tried in small experiments but never in a larger context as you describe which does lead to complexity, of course.
For instance, there was a successful community in Mexico that became decentralized in all ways and functioned very well within it's own context, but if someone broke a law that was major such as theft of property to violence against others, they were shunned from the community. This could only work if there were somewhere to shun the lawbreakers to and would mean the community is thrusting off it's worst people to other communities in the shunning. It was a problem.
I will look at your model. I'm glad you're out there in the world thinking it up.
God Bless.
Pirate, you made my day! The day's still young but I'll still be counting this as a miracle when I go to sleep. Thanks for your response!
You're bringing up an excellent question. How do we control the behaviors of people over whom we have no jurisdiction without a centralized gov't? That's a major problem now in tribal reservations, where they attract the worst through gambling and drinking, and those men rape with impunity because there's no judicial reach. It also affects all of us through scams that empty bank accounts with no recourse in Nigeria or Russia.
I've given some thought to how a network of commonwealths could solve that, and I think indigenous tribes provide a clue. What they had was collective apologies, expressed in symbolic gifts, to show that they would handle the transgressor appropriately. If the victim's tribe didn't feel that was sufficient, they might declare war.
Let's say you have a voluntary int'l coalition of commonwealths who agree that theft and violence are wrong. Someone from another commonwealth steals or attacks in your commonwealth. Their home community would be expected to take that person back and show they'd taken steps to make sure it would never happen again. Perhaps the bioregion or even the federation (100's of millions) would have responsibility for them.
If this wasn't adequate, because offenses kept coming from people in that region, the entire network of commonwealths would refuse to allow access of people, products or currency for a set amount of time, maybe 6 mos. I wouldn't make that a binding agreement, but a voluntary intent to be decided commonwealth by commonwealth.
Does this apply to how federations treat their own people? If Liberia has fourth generation slavery, including children, in their rubber plantations, do I still buy Firestone tires for my school buses, since they're cheapest? I think that's perhaps a different network of voluntary commonwealths.
But I think it's important that prisons don't become an industry that inflicts the lawbreakers on impoverished communities--as happens in my hometown. The communities who are creating the problems--generally inflicted on them by the oligarch system--have to be responsible for the consequences. And have consequences that force them to take back their own economies and judicial systems.
Providence you should bring up tribal govts. I am a citizen of an American Native Nation that uses gambling as the backbone of it's income and extension of power in the small community I live in which is the headquarters of the Nation whose influence *primarily due to casino monies) extends to the state and even the feds.
We have our own Ambassador in DC. and employ various DC approved bureaucrats in positions of vast tribal influence. Like Sec. of Health from DC who is not a citizen, but came several years (ahem...) prior to covid and implemented the tribal mandates-not-mandates on the tribe. They were coercive in many directions and the Nation profited by their compliance and participation in the coercion. I know firsthand. I WAS working for the Nation at the time and lost my job for speaking out in no uncertain terms for over a year against these policies but primarily against the bioweapons.
I also understand the corruption of the casinos on the Nations and their ties to China thanks to Nixon's deal declaring the Native Tribes their own sovereign nations thus enabling lawful gambling. The Nation I'm a citizen of adores Nixon. He's nearly a god to them. Nuff said.
Today the Nation (I won't name them on the internet as they scrape for mentions of their name, being highly sensitive to public perceptions and online presence...) has been granted many financial advantages for their cooperation with the feds over covid as well as other "perks". One of those recent "perks" has been 100% legal jurisdiction over their own citizens within the tribal boundaries regardless of crime. The tribal boundaries extend for multiple counties within the state where non-citizens of the Nation reside and have nothing to do with reservation boundaries. This is more common than people are aware.
An example I know firsthand is of a non-tribal citizen having his car stolen by a tribal citizen and the owner to this day has no recourse to reclaim his property, the thief has received no trial or punishment (the Nation doesn't have any prisons so they convict no one to prison time...) .
Now this kind of injustice causes all sorts of anger and resentment. To quell, the Nation builds public buildings, bridges, parks and improves sidewalks, etc., to insure cooperation with local government. As well as donations to needy local charities, etc.
What I'm getting at here, as I'm sure you're aware, is how people corrupt one another almost continually. How to prevent this corruption is, IMO, the crux of the biscuit.
We can create all kinds of structures and I think the one you are proposing is an interesting one, but the influences of money and power are difficult to control and are usually conducted behind closed doors in secret.
The motto of the Nation is "to improve the overall lives of the people." They sincerely believe this is what they're doing by selling themselves to China and the feds, etc. Though no citizen receives one slim dime of casino monies (more typical than people think) and instead have been given an ever growing bureaucracy that employs many citizens in lame bureaucratic jobs that don't pay much but offer a lifetime of cronyism and security.
People laud local or decentralized government as some kind of cure all for big government, yet I see no difference except in the fact the little fish only eat even smaller fish. The bigger fish have more of a selection on their menu.
How to overcome this predatory imperative?
Now it’s biomedical techno enslavement. They will vax wirelessly and they won’t need your consent. And noahide will take care of dissenters, Christ believers or anyone against “the greater good”. OFF with their heads!
It's hard having the only option be 'like'. I want a button that says, 'yikes!'
This is yikes: medical billing code ICD10 Y35, legal beheading. Why I’m the world would that exist? Noahide’s.
Correction; Y35.5
I love this dialogue here between you two. same concerns about precision of language and free speech vs lawful speech. Hate speech and hate organizations grew because people tried to mandate against it - which just made the hate grow and mutate into something it might not have. Authoritarian mandates from anyone never work.
Very well said! And yes, it's such a pleasure to have these dialogues with other people working out the details of 'how' and 'why'.
Looks like Pompeo is out. So that’s something.
I’m not on Team Trump but I’m glad he won. Not because my of any high expectations but because the Dems deserved this devastating loss.
That is something. I'm glad to be wrong on that prediction.
I'm relieved Trump won too, truth be told, because it means the agenda is moving forward. I don't want a four-year delay, I want what's coming out in the open.
That's an interesting perspective on the Dems deserving this loss. It resonates with me. It makes me think I should offer to talk with my neighbors, if you read my reply to Heather. This may be a rare time that they're willing to listen.
How is substitute teaching going? I've heard it's brutal.
I also believe a Trump win will squeeze out the zit faster. And yes, at first watching the meltdowns was funny and now, the more I see their hot takes, and the posts for suicide prevention hotlines, and the unimaginable lack of self awareness, the sadder I get. I’m trying to have real conversations with some of my friends. I think they might be slightly more open to conversation especially if one can avoid pouring salt into the wound.
Re: teaching
lol. I’ll tell you about it tomorrow.
I thought the same thing. I didn’t vote Trump, was tempted to but I still don’t trust the guy even though I like some of those on his team, so I did my usual 3rd party protest vote. But I’m definitely glad the Dems lost, they’re liars and deserved it.
Do you mean the politicians are liars or the voters? On politicians, I agree. On the voters, I think they're lying to themselves but I think the same for those who trust in Trump. I don't think anyone can really lie to you without a way that you're lying to yourself in order to buy into it. The liberal lie is their superiority. That's what I'd like to get my neighbors to see.
Oh, I was definitely taping about Dem politicians and media. Regular Dem citizens are just victims of propaganda, basically all my friends and family are Democrats.
hola, tereza. a fun read.
yes to your argument and observations from past and present.
it does seem to me that there is some kind of shifting of energy, perhaps only the psychological zeitgeist, although i think beyond that. and that shift is that with the convid having not succeeded as the ptb were planning — i think way fewer have died than expected and their logistical plans are unable to accommodate the number still living — much more people are awake and no longer are giving the needed energy of trust to support the existing social authoritarian-based structure. (not patriarchal!)
so... trump is the wild card. regardless of what does or doesn't happen, we are in for interesting time. at his core he has the ability to bring people together of diverse talents and abilities. i do think that term 1 was a training session for him and this time it will be more serious. to what extent can he disentangle himself from the money or not? the energy of personal agency moves way beyond the person, and so it will be fascinating to see how that rolls out into the political structure and its functioning. the leadership attuned to that energy can achieve a lot especially in the administrative parts of the government and society.
i have no idea how this will work out. way too many variables at play. and the cabalista are still powerful and now likely getting ready to double down in some way outside of their plans and so are becoming a bit more obvious in their craziness. and that will wake up more and.... [headshake.]
absolutely fascinating times. pass the popcorn!
all the best with what is changing. everything changes. with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
🙏❤️☯️🧘♂️❤️🙏
I like your thinking, Guy, that everything's not proceeding according to the plan of the PTB.
Even a wild card is not the player. The fabrications go so deep that I wouldn't be surprised to find his name was chosen for that very analogy. Looking back, his first term set everything in motion and inflicted liberals with TDS, so they would be for everything he was against, and against everything he was for. Then he stepped back and let a senile old man take the blame as it all played out. Now he can be played on any suit and sweep the round. Clever, I'll give them that.
yes.
i was thinking similar, that it was important that trump lose in 2020. from a high energetic perspective because when the people of the society are really really really asleep, waking them up isn't just simply a gentle slap on the face. the arrogance of the clintons and the obamas was expressed and fed by them having 'won' that election. imo there is no question the various mockingbird media manipulations, perhaps most significantly although not solely the biden laptop, backed by pretty obvious vote tampering got them in. and the good outcome of that is that their arrogance went into complete hubris. what ever marginal connection they had for the amercian populace was gone. and so for the next for years they spoke from their mountain of hubris and oblivious to the shit coming out of their mouths that was burying themselves. some of the post mortems have been absolutely astonishing, the complete utter total hubristic disrespect still spewing.
why was that good? because it allowed the true extent of their ideological evil — by which i mean to live with a celebration and empowerment anti-life ideologies and actions — to be shown so completely. how did conspiracy sarah say it so well? if you don't see it now, your are complicit. (and that from sarah might be a caution to consider regarding your lib neighbours.)
so... the 4 years of american 'purgatory' was in fact an important wake up call and a powerful call to rouse the 'healthy' anger that wakes us up to taking actions against the contempt of the 'evil ones'; and to turn towards people who are being energised into life, even if by that ostensibly crazy man with the sense of humour who dodged more bullets including a real one that it is possible to imagine; and who is alive and fighting for life. it seems to me that his claim to be not a politician, while correct, is more accurately that he is living in a near perfect alignment with his own personal integration/integrity with the energy of the universe. people who truly live into life their own eccentric self from that place are often perceived poorly, because the inauthentic project onto those people their own shadows. so interesting to see what is happening.
all the best with what is changing. everything changes.
Let me clarify, Guy, you think Trump is "living in a near perfect alignment with his own personal integration/integrity with the energy of the universe"?
yes. he is authentic within himself and so can be irreverent, rude, crude and funny. a great definition of 'enlightenment' is, for example, complete indifference to the opinions of others. so, harris and the dems and surrogates all need scripts and actors to read them and then closed loop feedback confirmation that their virtue signalling is being approvingly heard. and trump absolutely doesn't.
and i love the 'alignment' of the name trump with the humour of the universe! after 35 years of noting and documenting the synchronicities in my life it is their humour that provides the final confirmation of the intelligence of the universe: humour requires intelligence. and so, you have the trump card, the joker, coming in and stomping all over virtue signalling of the democrats! too funny.
and of course, you have the enantiodromia aspect too! in jungian psychology there is the awareness that often people moving towards individuation or away from it experience 'enantiodromia': flipping into what they were not and what they once found alien or repugnant! so, both the dems and the republicans express this so perfectly, although in opposite ways! the dems, having successfully lied about being for the working person and for peace had the mask torn off and exposed themselves as completely indifferent to people and overtly pro-war. (i read this earlier, tonight, synchronistically in yet another 'why i left the left; because the left left me' confession. the writer, at a democratic fund raiser, of which she was one, wrote: 'When you consider what the modern Democratic Party has become, you begin to understand how they lost touch with their base. At the home of a major donor, a billionaire who lives in a mansion overlooking San Francisco Bay, I listened to the speakers hoping to raise funds for the 2022 midterms. Waiters dressed in black with silver trays bounced between wealthy elites. The speakers outlined their strategy for winning the midterms and the 2024 election saying: “We no longer want to win the working class. We don’t need those people anymore. They’re gone forever. The future will be young Latinos and people of color.”' (from 'I Raised $50 Million for the Democrats. This Week, I Voted for Trump.: The Democratic Party turned its back on me and my family long before I turned my back on it' https://www.thefp.com/p/democrat-fundraiser-evan-barker-i-voted-trump).)
so, trump as the wild card actually represents to a 't', maybe, what i mean when i express the idea of 'appropriate eccentric action': the stoic individuated self, with 'stoic' going back to its original meaning of being unaffected by the opinions of others, not its commonly understood meaning as being cold. so... the wacky billionaire represents the hope of the poor people who want to be themselves as individuals. hence his popularity with everybody! i find this so funny! and of course the dems are supporting robotic simulacrums of cookie cutter humans: no original thought and, at the extreme of that, their absolute desire to neuter everyone they can! and harris actually was the perfect representation of that: devoid of originality and eccentricity. everything scripted, often badly, and usually poorly delivered. (so much so 60 minutes edited her to 'fix' her! lol! omg, so funny!)
have you watched candace owens' series on the family roots of kamela harris? fascinating and likely explains a lot of why she was 'given', ie was picked to be the next token. and why she was 'fake' as i've read people describe her. it turns out that her mother worked at ewan cameron's mk-ultra hospital in montreal for the cia. things that make you go hmmmm. to what extent has harris, who has shown herself really a rather poor human and certainly a poor politician, been 'successful'? by being picked and appointed in various ways as a puppet.
so, yes; trump is the epitome of a stoic, an individuated human, alive at the fullest sense of what that means. an example of that is how he had the 'easy' energy at his age to out perform, physically, emotionally and intellectually, the dems. amazing to watch. and i smiled every time i heard a completely deluded dem criticising him for being weak and incompetent! now that was projection.
now, can he 'clean the swamp'? no idea. what he has done, though, is inspired people to grow. not a small feat. what is happening, in the great apocalypse, of which he is a part, is to stop relying on the opinions of others, even the experts, and to become our own agents. wonderful time! amazing, isn't it? your ideas are likely not all that far away from being realised, as what is happening represents a huge shift in consciousness into maturity and individuated humans.
all the best with what is changing. everything changes!
So ... you think that Trump isn't beholden to the hundreds of $millions from Zionist donors, and doesn't care what they think? Did he choose JD Vance as his own agent or because Elon Musk and Peter Thiel made their huge donations conditional on it? What could Trump do or fail to do, once he's in office, that would make you feel he wasn't authentic, but was playing the part assigned to him? Being rude and crude is, imo, part of the act. His job was to offend liberals so much they'd be for anything he was against and against anything he was for. It's certainly worked.
that i don't know. on the surface all that you say makes perfect sense and so logically i won't say no.
however, my intuitive feeling is that he isn't. a challenge i have with logical connections, that you describe, is that they certainly 'mean' something. and at the same time synchronistically the meaning might be more than what we're seeing logically — well, mostly, of course, because logic cannot connect to what isn't seen and gets entangled with limited mind viruses more often than not.
it seems to me that the universe — whatever that is! — has a very long end game is one way of putting it. a big part of our current social 'problems', if you want to put it that way, and that you articulate well in this essay and elsewhere, is the monetary debt system being likely controlled by some version of the jq elohim worship cult (as clif high calls them), or the km or the rhaddanite bankers or .... loosely zionists. our social entanglement with it is too big, again as you wrote, for that fall simply be banished as if by magic from an authoritarian top down hero. we've exited the age of the other as hero! and the other as villain.
so.... did the zionists help him? sure. does that mean they control him? hmmmmm. it would seem logical to make that inference and so I won't argue against that logic. my intuition, which has no authority over you and that i use as a signpost not as a truthpost, says not. time will tell. and it could be that four years won't be enough for that to be made clear. or maybe it will depending on how the israel question is addressed. how long is the long game for human emancipation from our being a social structure built on ritual physical, emotional and psychological abuse married to indebtedness as enslavement? no idea. one person at a time and if that is all the trump is able to do, is to inspire one person at a time in a significant way....? well, that might be all that is enough and all his destiny is asking of him.
and i don't think being rude and crude was part of an act, actually. i don't know for sure, although i seem to remember thinking/feeling that he had that kind of offputing rudeness and crudeness with him from before he became a politician. i paid little attention to him until this year. to the best of my remembrance of him from the unavoidable encounters through tv.
note that i am of the opinion that the political structure we are living is a very corrupt theatre and that the money directs the powers. and that money is a very cleverly orchestrated enslavement system, against which my course 'economics debunked' and 'banks skanks' argued. and even funnier for me is that this year it is the first time in about 40 years that i've attended an election, neither in canadian nor the usa! (i even presented a paper at an inquiry in canada on the poor nature of the democratic system where i suggested an alternative which is to remove the money component part of it by going to politician by some kind of delineated jury system - that was in the early 00s when the opposition party was able to get by a small amount the majority of the popular vote and only 3 or 4 of 78 seats in the house.) and, independently of me, it turns out that my sister and her husband have also been attending this more closely than any election in decades. hmmmm.
so, my having become interested in this one is... puzzling to me. (to my sis, too.) i think that there is change in consciousness. some of the spiritual people i respect have made this comment. and my own experiences with how the engagement with people for the last twenty-five years about living the bully language of being in bully stockholm syndrome has changed a huge amount. that is, for me, a tangible measure of that change. as are the comments of people like anneke lucas who was overjoyed that she now has a voice and an audience to her having been a victim of satanic worship rituals of torture and rape. for her that was a huge change in the cultural landscape, that truths were being spoken and heard.
there are lots of 'synchronicities' that point to us being in the beginning of a great apocalypse. so, trump is a part of that in a significant way. i'm curious to see how and what he does. and i do not pin hope or despair on that. simply curiosity, while keeping my eyes open for the synchronicities. they are where we have an opportunity to see/hear/feel the universe talking to us with its very funny jokes. seriously, a trump 'card' as president? rotlf! can't get better than that!
time will tell. all the best with what is changing.
🙏❤️🧘♂️☯️🧘♂️❤️🙏
a non-sequitur question: how do you get the double block quotation marked?
oh good, an easy question! It's only possible by setting your block quote first and then pasting something that already has a block quote in it. Starting from scratch (or a non-Substack source) I don't think it lets you do it. As we've both found, it just takes the block quote off to hit it twice.
excellent!
i tried it and failed at first. with your nudge i copied a completely separate stand alone quotation and voilá. bueno.
❤️🧘♂️☯️🧘♂️❤️🙏
Tereza, you talk so much sense. Hopefully I will find time soon to share my own views on DT’s return to the WH. (Just got back into my apartment this week and needing to finish another piece first).
Looking forward to that talk and to that piece, Neshma. Welcome back!
Here are some more un-measurables that can be debated until the End of Days ... We'll see ...
• Trump’s 10-Point Plan to Dismantle the Deep State Laid Out [VIDEO] – a Keeper
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/trumps-10-point-plan-to-dismantle-the-deep-state-laid-out-video-a-keeper/
President-Elect Trump just laid out a 10-point plan to unravel the Deep State. (3 min, 40 sec)
1. RESTORE President’s authority to remove rogue bureaucrats.
2. FIRE corrupt actors in National Security and Intelligence apparatus.
3. REFORM FISA courts, which are “so corrupt that the judges seemingly do not care when they are lied to in warrant applications.
4. ESTABLISH Truth and Reconciliation Commission to declassify and publish all documents on Deep State spying, censorship, and corruption.
5. CRACKDOWN on government leakers who collude with the fake news to deliberately weave false narratives and to subvert our government and our democracy.
6. MAKE every Inspector General’s Office independent and physically separated from the departments they oversee.
7. ASK Congress to establish independent auditing system to monitor our intelligence agencies and ensure they are not spying on our citizens or running disinformation campaigns against the American people.
8. MOVE parts of the sprawling federal bureaucracy to new locations outside Washington, «just as I moved the Bureau of Land Management to Colorado.”
9. BAN federal bureaucrats from taking jobs at the companies they deal with and that they regulate, “like with Big Pharma”. (ER: The revolving door phenomena)
10. PUSH for constitutional amendment to impose term limits on members of Congress.
and this definitely sounds worth measuring ...
• 🙌 Trumps Plan to UNLEASH 100+ Ferocious Legal Warriors across America - just a dutch dude
https://odysee.com/@Qwinten:b/%F0%9F%99%8C-Trumps-Plan-to-UNLEASH-100+-Ferocious-Legal-Warriors-across-America:c
Thanks for the shout-out again Tereza!
At 3am this morning, I had my first dose of reality after the confusing euphoria of a Trump win.
I wrote about that here: https://philipmollica.substack.com/p/taking-our-power-back
Oh good, I had your article open to read so I'm glad for the reminder. Just to clarify, your position is that there are two actual sides represented at the top. Mine is that there's only one and Trump is part of it. Julius linked the Rurik Skywalker essay above showing that 25M Dem voters were added to the 2020 election results, then disappeared for this one. Biden needed to take the blame for the CovidCon and Ukraine, so Trump could come back with a clean slate of angry voters--at someone else.
Sincerity is a nebulous thing to measure, like Guy's intuition. What I look for are contradictions between what Trump says and what he does. Lee Fang writes about one of his first important appointments of Susie Wiles as Sec't of State:
"Wiles is the co-chair of Mercury Public Affairs, one of the largest lobbying firms in the US. The company counts many clients which are at odds with various aspects of the Trump agenda. Over the last year, its roster has included Kraft Heinz and Nestlé, makers of ultra-processed junk foods that will be at odds with the promised “Make America Healthy Again” reforms of public health agencies. According to forms filed with Congress, Wiles is directly registered as a lobbyist for tobacco firm Swisher International on matters related to “FDA regulations.”
"The client list includes AT&T, Airbnb, eBay, Archer Daniels Midland, and many other corporate giants. However, it may be her company’s extensive foreign lobbying that will raise the most eyebrows.
"Mercury currently represents the state of Qatar, Libya’s national oil company, and three major Chinese corporations: JinkoSolar, Hikvision USA, and Alibaba. The Chinese firms have contended with American tariffs and other restrictions. Hikvision, in particular, has faced enhanced sanctions from the Biden administration over allegations that the company’s surveillance cameras are used for human rights abuses and military purposes."
https://www.leefang.com/p/susie-wiles-lobby-firm-helped-chinas
Along with the MAHA agenda, this seems at odds with Trump's statement that he would stop the 'revolving door' by demanding a 'cooling off period' of 7-8 yrs before someone goes from gov't to a related corporate job. It seems this doesn't work in reverse.
I'm changing my name to Tereza Wet Blanket Coraggio.
Indeed, my perception changes as I go forward. I just kinda present what I have at any given time. It is certainly feasible that it's all the same psyop.
Either way, it does not fare well for us. And as I said in my piece, we will never vote our way out of this. I appreciate your continuing perspective.
I did not know that about Wiles. Very interesting and shoulda known. No wonder she wants to keep a low profile.
I appreciate you too, Philip.
This is encouraging - as Ryan Dawson says ... Let's Hold Him To Them
• Trump's Promises: Let's Hold Him To Them - Ryan Dawson
https://rumble.com/v5nkdln-trumps-promises-lets-hold-him-to-them.html
This won't happen unless the ADL is exposed as, and declared an alien terrorist Hate group.
Another snippet ...
• $23 Billion for Israel - If Americans Knew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3ffUJbRYIk
"He's in on the con, imo." $100M from Miriam Adelson in exchange for annexation of West Bank certainly says so.
First things first I love that top you're wearing!
I'm glad Trump won mainly because it's an irritant that may help push programmed Dems to look outside their usual references. When he disappoints, I hope it does the same to Rep believers who are still avoiding the reality that no 'leader' is gonna fix this mess. So, basically speeding up the unraveling is good! Thanks, T.
I love your priorities! Isn't that top fun? A thrift store find.
You put that so well, Kathleen, no surprise. Around here, people too young to vote are having marches with very garbled signs. I can't quite figure out their gripe. So no looking outside the usual references yet, but I'm still thinking about that message to my neighbors.
And yes, Philip came to that realization already in his new post: https://philipmollica.substack.com/p/well-that-didnt-take-long. I'm with you on speeding up the unraveling. Thanks, Kathleen!
I think a little progress was made. There will be a little less ZOG. Hopefully, it's just a start.
✌️😉👍