Jan 8, 2023·edited Jan 8, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
"Conveniently, every single nation out of 175 countries apparently had laws allowing unilateral executive action instantaneously bypassing every democratic safeguard.
And, bizarrely, every executive agreed with the same plan. Apparently. Or, ‘someone’ bypassed or overruled them all. It proved that our legislators, parliamentarians, delegates and ministers are merely window-dressing, when push comes to shove. They’re just actors, whether they know it or not.
Someone made a call."
So why not Sweden, Belarus, Nicaragua, Tanzania, Brazil, Uruguay, South Dakota, etc. then? Well, Sweden (and Japan) was largely spared in part because their constitution forbade lockdowns or mandates, but then again so did a lot of countries. Sweden, however, was already farther advanced than the rest of the world in terms of digital ID technology, so they were likely close to the heart of the Davos agenda somehow. As for the other countries and states? Well, most of them had leaders that opposed the globalist agenda to one degree or another. And of course Tanzania's President John Magufuli died under suspicious circumstances after not toeing the globalist line. And Lukashenko of Belarus was apparently repeatedly offered bribes in exchange for agreeing to lockdown but refused every time.
Jan 8, 2023·edited Jan 8, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
"there’s no question of ‘if’ but only ‘who?’ "
Excellent question and thank you for helping us to figure this out!
The way I see it, the U.S. DOD has been the world's crooked cop, and is implementing this, but there is someone behind there calling the shots, and I don't mean Gates and Soros who I think are just middle managers.
(Banned)Apr 1, 2023·edited Apr 1, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Great question.
Mass media appears intended to brainwash and dumb down the masses. The masses are not monolithic except for their gullibility, so there really is nothing mainstream about the masses.
"Mainstream" is a fraudulent concept intended to legitimize mass media as authoritative to a degree. The garbage our owners want the masses to believe is labeled "mainstream" because it suggests that it's somehow acceptable info when it's really nothing of the sort. It's really a product of our handlers and they are the "elite;" they are not of the mainstream by any means. This works because of the well known phenomenon that people are uncomfortable if they feel they're outside of some group or another. On the other hand, "mass media" has a well deserved connotation of being derogatory. If people think that what they're exposed to is mainstream, then they get to praise or statisfy themselves that they're "cool," "with it," "informed," etc. when in fact the opposite is often true.
He and Tom Luongo did an interview on unlimited hangout against the cynics, Riley Waggaman and an editor from off guardian.
Both Matt and Tom were ignorant of key points of Russia and their real convid policy.
Instead, they assumed that Putin was against mandates, and went on that.
Imagine you are a foreigner looking at US policy and economics. Would you trust CNN or fox news? Or would you look at other sources, just in case the state controls those media outlets?
Matt and Tom trust the mainstream Eastern media, while calling ours propaganda.
BTW, the Ukraine war reminds me of 1984. Even Scott Ritter is almost seeing the point, that somehow despite Russia's superiority with a 10 to 1 ratio of deaths in the war, Ukraine isn't running out of troops. And yet Russia had to retreat? And then they targeted the Ukrainian electrical grid. But still we have videos of how the lights are still on in many Ukrainian cities?!
Hmm, and I'm sure the chocolate rations are up 20% too lol!
"We were always at war with eastasia" while the east says "we were always at war with Oceania" and so on. Keep having excuses why people need to sacrifice economically and rights wise. Both sides' oligarchs benefit greatly.
Here's a good blog on the issues with the war and policies in Russia.
Thank you so much. I will do my best to post it to SolutionSeeking.substack.com, along with the URLs you provide, and your Substack address. Please let me know if that is ok, and if you have any wishes I should keep in mind. I wish Substack allowed us to send files in these threads, as I would love it if you wrote the entire post yourself in a way that I could easily write an explanation for and just import what you want to share. I know you are busy so I will just do my best.
Now I will thank you for the insights you have shared. And now I realize what I currently think the most urgent goal of SolutionSeeking.substack.com should be. I think what is urgently required is solution seeking to stop or halt the war against all life on the planet that the 1% are waging. Once this goal is achieved, then it will be time to consider and implement solutions like what you have created, in ways that guarantee complete transparency of all institutions, no concentration of extreme wealth and power over others, no government or other secrets, no secret control societies, etc. In nocturnal wanderings last night strong spiritual guidance was given and gratefully accepted. And, yet again, I did not get enough sleep, so when I make my usual grammatical and other amazing auto correct and other mistakes in this message, and then try to go back and correct it, please forgive me.
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Gotta be careful about saying the word "Rothschild" in even the slightest negative way in certain places these days. How about "Wrathchild", like the Iron Maiden song? That might be a good code word to get past the censors, lol. "Rockefeller" also works too and still makes sense.
Jan 8, 2023·edited Jan 8, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
I am so thankful I discovered this Substack. Thank you Tereza Coraggio for your incredible work. Some of you may be interested in what some are attempting, as described below. For those who want to participate in the much needed discussions of full range models of what happened and full range discussion of solutions, please take a look at the following
I could use some help here as facilitator of this young effort, in its preliminary brainstorming stage. I am not a writer. I am an engineer with success analyzing all possible models for complex challenges, considering all possible solutions, and analyzing the merits of the different possible solutions. It is curious that our enemy appears to do this kind of planning and analysis but our side does nothing like it. When do we start considering real, innovative solutions? Who else has done this or is doing it? Isn't it up to us?
Experience clearly shows that this kind of effort is not just for technical people, but, rather, the more diverse the well meaning participation, the better.
The following is an attempt to use Substack as a think tank sharing platform where all who participate respectfully and in good faith as equals can share and analyze a wide range of models and possible solutions. The hope is that, by doing this, we might come up with something that has not been thought of or tried so far, something that might save the planet.
"...I end with some hopeful ways in which the empire might be dismantling itself and preparing the ground for a network of small, local economies."
Excellent read again Tereza, thank you for your valuable work. I have been seeking a micro solution for many years, for clear and obvious reasons, rather than attempting to unfurl what can be an impenetrable web of actors networked over centuries and probably at each others throats. I guess we are collateral damage, unwanted in a New World Order.
The centralisation of the industrial world has grown for 200 years fuelled first with coal and then with oil, the most energy dense commodity on the planet. The economics of oil production are not readily understood by most. It has driven the global population from 1 billion in 1800 to approaching 9 billion this decade; nature's solution to abundance.
But it has come to an end, or rather it came to an end at the turn of the century and thus the growth in prosperity has ended too and now the global financial system, upon which our temporary life of excess rests, has to fail also. Those with the power have known this for at least 70 years and have made plans accordingly to secure their privileges within a new paradigm.
The key to 'Protecting' our assets and 'Surviving' the coming global phase transition will be first to understand what the complex adaptive systems of current economics in a world bereft of cheap energy will look like. Yes, there's tonnes of hydrocarbons available for many lifetimes but this is not the nub of the problem - EROEI is the problem. I have written many essays on this subject - here are two:
> Or do all these roads ultimately lead to Rothschilds?
From: https://www.tbheritage.com/Breeders/FR/Rothschild/Rothschild1.html
« In 1843 [Mayer Rothschild] registered the Rothschild racing colours of dark blue and yellow.»
Ukraine is not the only one with a blue-yellow flag. Here are some other countries/entities:
- European Union
three countries involved with mass slaughter:
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kosovo
- Rwanda (flag with some green)
It might all be a coincidence, of course.
"Conveniently, every single nation out of 175 countries apparently had laws allowing unilateral executive action instantaneously bypassing every democratic safeguard.
And, bizarrely, every executive agreed with the same plan. Apparently. Or, ‘someone’ bypassed or overruled them all. It proved that our legislators, parliamentarians, delegates and ministers are merely window-dressing, when push comes to shove. They’re just actors, whether they know it or not.
Someone made a call."
So why not Sweden, Belarus, Nicaragua, Tanzania, Brazil, Uruguay, South Dakota, etc. then? Well, Sweden (and Japan) was largely spared in part because their constitution forbade lockdowns or mandates, but then again so did a lot of countries. Sweden, however, was already farther advanced than the rest of the world in terms of digital ID technology, so they were likely close to the heart of the Davos agenda somehow. As for the other countries and states? Well, most of them had leaders that opposed the globalist agenda to one degree or another. And of course Tanzania's President John Magufuli died under suspicious circumstances after not toeing the globalist line. And Lukashenko of Belarus was apparently repeatedly offered bribes in exchange for agreeing to lockdown but refused every time.
"there’s no question of ‘if’ but only ‘who?’ "
Excellent question and thank you for helping us to figure this out!
The way I see it, the U.S. DOD has been the world's crooked cop, and is implementing this, but there is someone behind there calling the shots, and I don't mean Gates and Soros who I think are just middle managers.
Great question.
Mass media appears intended to brainwash and dumb down the masses. The masses are not monolithic except for their gullibility, so there really is nothing mainstream about the masses.
"Mainstream" is a fraudulent concept intended to legitimize mass media as authoritative to a degree. The garbage our owners want the masses to believe is labeled "mainstream" because it suggests that it's somehow acceptable info when it's really nothing of the sort. It's really a product of our handlers and they are the "elite;" they are not of the mainstream by any means. This works because of the well known phenomenon that people are uncomfortable if they feel they're outside of some group or another. On the other hand, "mass media" has a well deserved connotation of being derogatory. If people think that what they're exposed to is mainstream, then they get to praise or statisfy themselves that they're "cool," "with it," "informed," etc. when in fact the opposite is often true.
I remember when the concept first came into vogue in the mid '80s and I find the google ngram interesting in that regard. Take a look at this, https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=the+mainstream+media&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3
Thanks for asking and please challenge me if that's not clear.
Matt Ehret is a bit too optimistic and naive.
He and Tom Luongo did an interview on unlimited hangout against the cynics, Riley Waggaman and an editor from off guardian.
Both Matt and Tom were ignorant of key points of Russia and their real convid policy.
Instead, they assumed that Putin was against mandates, and went on that.
Imagine you are a foreigner looking at US policy and economics. Would you trust CNN or fox news? Or would you look at other sources, just in case the state controls those media outlets?
Matt and Tom trust the mainstream Eastern media, while calling ours propaganda.
BTW, the Ukraine war reminds me of 1984. Even Scott Ritter is almost seeing the point, that somehow despite Russia's superiority with a 10 to 1 ratio of deaths in the war, Ukraine isn't running out of troops. And yet Russia had to retreat? And then they targeted the Ukrainian electrical grid. But still we have videos of how the lights are still on in many Ukrainian cities?!
Hmm, and I'm sure the chocolate rations are up 20% too lol!
"We were always at war with eastasia" while the east says "we were always at war with Oceania" and so on. Keep having excuses why people need to sacrifice economically and rights wise. Both sides' oligarchs benefit greatly.
Here's a good blog on the issues with the war and policies in Russia.
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/
Thank you so much. I will do my best to post it to SolutionSeeking.substack.com, along with the URLs you provide, and your Substack address. Please let me know if that is ok, and if you have any wishes I should keep in mind. I wish Substack allowed us to send files in these threads, as I would love it if you wrote the entire post yourself in a way that I could easily write an explanation for and just import what you want to share. I know you are busy so I will just do my best.
Now I will thank you for the insights you have shared. And now I realize what I currently think the most urgent goal of SolutionSeeking.substack.com should be. I think what is urgently required is solution seeking to stop or halt the war against all life on the planet that the 1% are waging. Once this goal is achieved, then it will be time to consider and implement solutions like what you have created, in ways that guarantee complete transparency of all institutions, no concentration of extreme wealth and power over others, no government or other secrets, no secret control societies, etc. In nocturnal wanderings last night strong spiritual guidance was given and gratefully accepted. And, yet again, I did not get enough sleep, so when I make my usual grammatical and other amazing auto correct and other mistakes in this message, and then try to go back and correct it, please forgive me.
Gotta be careful about saying the word "Rothschild" in even the slightest negative way in certain places these days. How about "Wrathchild", like the Iron Maiden song? That might be a good code word to get past the censors, lol. "Rockefeller" also works too and still makes sense.
I am so thankful I discovered this Substack. Thank you Tereza Coraggio for your incredible work. Some of you may be interested in what some are attempting, as described below. For those who want to participate in the much needed discussions of full range models of what happened and full range discussion of solutions, please take a look at the following
I could use some help here as facilitator of this young effort, in its preliminary brainstorming stage. I am not a writer. I am an engineer with success analyzing all possible models for complex challenges, considering all possible solutions, and analyzing the merits of the different possible solutions. It is curious that our enemy appears to do this kind of planning and analysis but our side does nothing like it. When do we start considering real, innovative solutions? Who else has done this or is doing it? Isn't it up to us?
Experience clearly shows that this kind of effort is not just for technical people, but, rather, the more diverse the well meaning participation, the better.
The following is an attempt to use Substack as a think tank sharing platform where all who participate respectfully and in good faith as equals can share and analyze a wide range of models and possible solutions. The hope is that, by doing this, we might come up with something that has not been thought of or tried so far, something that might save the planet.
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/coming-soon
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/my-current-best-guess-at-the-best
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/the-class-war-waged-by-the-1-silent
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/edward-snowdens-contributions-to
Thank you.
"...I end with some hopeful ways in which the empire might be dismantling itself and preparing the ground for a network of small, local economies."
Excellent read again Tereza, thank you for your valuable work. I have been seeking a micro solution for many years, for clear and obvious reasons, rather than attempting to unfurl what can be an impenetrable web of actors networked over centuries and probably at each others throats. I guess we are collateral damage, unwanted in a New World Order.
The centralisation of the industrial world has grown for 200 years fuelled first with coal and then with oil, the most energy dense commodity on the planet. The economics of oil production are not readily understood by most. It has driven the global population from 1 billion in 1800 to approaching 9 billion this decade; nature's solution to abundance.
But it has come to an end, or rather it came to an end at the turn of the century and thus the growth in prosperity has ended too and now the global financial system, upon which our temporary life of excess rests, has to fail also. Those with the power have known this for at least 70 years and have made plans accordingly to secure their privileges within a new paradigm.
The key to 'Protecting' our assets and 'Surviving' the coming global phase transition will be first to understand what the complex adaptive systems of current economics in a world bereft of cheap energy will look like. Yes, there's tonnes of hydrocarbons available for many lifetimes but this is not the nub of the problem - EROEI is the problem. I have written many essays on this subject - here are two:
Understanding EROEI : https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/the-financial-jigsaw-part-2-the-end?s=w
And just one potential solution: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/the-financial-jigsaw-part-2-localisation?s=w
I am writing Part 2 of my book as events unfold and the fog perhaps lifts a little - so I post some essays as I go.