Tereza, thank you for exploring this topic. I'm curious as to why there aren't so many comments on it? I know for myself, it feels quite overwhelming. I worry about those people in my family who have taken the shots. I am relieved that I stood firm for myself and my son. I wonder about the nature of reality here and if it all truly is a dream, then what is called for us in this time?
I dislike calling people evil as well, and agree that "evil" disempowers people. If it's true "that they're in a race with the clock to set as much death in motion as possible (including the deaths of babies who will never be born) before people make the connection. Pharma profits are just a side-hustle" then how to relate to this intention to kill many people? What is called for us, those who are seeing the situation through this lens?
For me, I'm trying to grow out of my anger in a healthy, deeply authentic way. I'm trying to build intimacy with my husband, who does not want to see the world the way I do. I'm trying to find ways to be more fully myself and less impacted by the world and the choices around me. For me, this is more of an energetic and emotional experience rather than moving to a new location or finding a whole new set of friends. Of course, I'm lucky because half of my friends and family sees covid as I do and either refused the shots, or at least were very understanding of my choices.
This article and video is a great one for an overview of the cancer possibility, and may be a helpful reference point if anyone I know needs an introduction to this topic. Thanks for compiling great resources here.
Thank you for the thoughtful response, Marta. I'm also surprised by the lack of comment and noticed that my YT version (https://youtu.be/ASBcBrFvJh8) only had one line in response. But two people--Colin in NZ and Maria in Aus--emailed me with some very interesting info and initiatives they're part of, and I encouraged them to post in the comments. We need all the clarity and hope we can get.
You ask the million-dollar question and one to which I have no ready answer. It's a daily practice to try to figure out what my role is to respond. This is the first person close to me with a life-threatening diagnosis, and I'm walking a very fine line that I may have overstepped. Here's the horrible dilemma they've placed us in: if my advice is ignored and the worst happens, there will be a sense of 'I told you so', even a sense that I'm somehow pleased to be right. But saying nothing, with what I know, would be prioritizing my relationships over the outcome. There's no question in my mind that this is part of the plan but it doesn't make the decision any easier.
I think your authentic response is a beautiful one. And it makes it clearer that your role doesn't need to be as the bearer of bad news for people around you. I'm sure it's the right path, and one I've chosen also to stay put in my life. We're here for a reason.
Calling a spade a spade is important. We're dealing with evil here in my opinion, and I believe we need to call it out as such. Regarding anger, anger is a real and necessary emotional reaction to a life threatening situation. And that's what we have here: A life threatening situation for all of us. I also know how anger can eat away at a person, so it's important to channel the energy of the anger into actions that confront the life threatening situation, actions that we hope can make a difference. We are in a brave new world, but it's not something that just popped up with covid. It's been a long time in the making. Look at what the Fauci, the FDA and AMA did with AZT, killing at least 300,000. Look at what Pharma has done with chemotherapy for decades and how the FDA has prohibited alternative non-toxic therapies. This killing for profit been a long time coming, but many believe that this time they have overplayed their hand, this time there is a real chance for us to dismantle the whole rotten edifice. God bless you for taking the time to write this article and God bless all who are fighting, doing what we can to destroy this evil.
Thank you, pimaCanyon, and I absolutely agree that "This killing for profit been a long time coming, but many believe that this time they have overplayed their hand, this time there is a real chance for us to dismantle the whole rotten edifice." How could I be angry with anyone who's dismantling the system that's caused so much pain and destruction, even if the role they're playing is the villain? As my book points out, killing for profit and making us complicit in it goes back 3500 years to the invention of coinage. It's finally coming to an end! Hurray! And I get to play the role of the observant bystander, nudging it along. Much more satisfying and enjoyable than having to be the villain.
We're in complete agreement about the facts, I just don't know what the strategy is with labeling people evil. At that point, there's no incentive for them to change their behavior. They're backed into a corner to win or die. If, on the other hand, we take the WEF at face value for believing that the population needs to be drastically reduced to save humanity, looking at the ways in which they've implemented that by objectively tying death rates and birth rates to their policies, we can argue that they're mistaken. It exposes WHAT they're doing by assuming their motives are good. Just my thoughts, but I welcome yours and thanks for reading my article!
Also - I keep reading about all the people who are dying or having side effects but I'm not aware of any people in my life that have obviously died after the vaccines or gotten overt side effects. I take it seriously from health providers who say they are seeing big numbers of people with side effects, and I'm holding the tension that it's not apparent in my real life in any meaningful way so far. Maybe my friends just aren't talking about any effects that they've had?
They are seeming to be sneaky side effects that you cannot prove. "Died suddenly" from climate change (sorry, that's a snarky one). I can't prove that the breast cancer which took my friend (in her 50's) in under 3 months was due to the shot (but I know she took them all). I can't prove that my neighbour in her 50's needed varicose vein surgery because of the shot (and one woman in my class: 2 varicose vein surgeries in 3 months in my small circles), or that her brother's death due to diabetic complications is related. I can't prove that the skin cancers, the constant illness, the fatigue and cog-fog I see around me is from the shot. But I know they all have taken it. All of these unproveable things, I have one death in my circle of friends, and 2 with 2 degrees of separation. (the SFX list is much higher, tracking 45 people with 1 or 2 degrees of separation)
Sorry, I read your second comment first but I meant to connect weather to geo-engineering not climate change. And yes, I'm visiting the person this weekend that I wrote this post about, for the first time since his diagnosis. He's on his second round of chemo.
Later this month I'm going back to my hometown where a neighbor's wife was just going in for heart surgery last time I visited, after months of barely being able to get out of bed. I heard since that she came out with an extremely accelerated heart rate that they said she could either live with or get a pacemaker. I've heard she just got it put in.
For every person I think they're so absorbed with their own tragedy that seeing a pattern isn't their priority and maybe more scary. It would say this wasn't fixable, was maybe intentional, wasn't just a fluke. My heart aches for them and all of us, since there's definitely attacks on the unvaxxed happening too.
I really like your articles! I have to say that I don't always manage to read them as thoroughly as I would like, but I nevertheless find your insightful, elegant but enquiring tone really refreshing. Refreshing because you make a clear coherent argument and allow me space to not only digest it, but also to find out for myself what I think. In the end I might not agree with you on everything , but you have allowed me the freedom to discover this for myself without feeling steamrollered.
Thank you for this - I wish we had more writers and commentators like you in the 'normal' media. Keep going!
Oh Michael, what a very sweet response! and your attitude is all that I would ever hope for. None of us should be easily influenced, aka gullible. And we should choose our dogmas wisely and consciously, and be willing to consider whatever doesn't contradict them. But there's such a wide stretch inbetween. I find myself sometimes having an almost virulent rejection of an idea, only to have the universe present me with it in different forms, again and again until I have to reconsider. And other people change my mind all the time, so please allow me to be part of that internal dialogue anytime you feel you can trust me to not steamroller!
And if you have any busy work to do, that involves your hands but not your head, you might be interested in the video. In this case, it's practically a different episode because it really dives into the socio-spiritual and briefly summarizes the science. Thank you for taking the time to respond and for your kind thoughts!
The CDC in their recent ACIP meeting recommending the bivalent jabs discussed adverse events and the second bullet point on one of the slides about Moderna adverse events said:
"2 participants each experienced two serious adverse events: prostate cancer diagnosis and traumatic fracture within 28 days of the booster dose"
There were 197 men in the trial, so 1 or 2 of them got prostate cancer within 28 days. (While most prostate cancer is slow-growing, this isn't universal).
Notice on the slide how they say "severe" events weren't associated with the Moderna vaccine, but they characterize the prostate cancer as "serious". In FDA-world, these are distinct things.
It could have been sloppy wording, and perhaps these one or two men just happened to have a previously scheduled PSA for right after they got this experimental injection, but to me it's like a Freudian slip and something got out that they were thinking about, but wanted to hide:
Good for you for reading this closely! I think Steve Kirsch has said the average time the vaccine takes to kill you is 5 months. His usual bluntness, of course, but it's interesting to compare that to a mere 28 day trial period.
Dear Tereza, thank you again for your care, clarity and ability to navigate between the realms of Mind and spirituality
I wanted to share with you the initiative that I am deeply a part of now because I became a board member. The World of Wellness International. It was incorporated last week. It is spearheaded but Professor Ian Brighthope http://www.worldofwellness.life I finally feel that I can stop looking and watching everything and actually participate in the revolution in a practical way.
Without me explaining you can see what it is about on the website which is still fresh and young as the whole organisation is. Ian has been a mover in the integration of Natural medicine, Vic C infusion etc for over 40 years. It is a big job and he is in touch with all the movers and shakers around the world. We need 1,000,000 go join
Thank you for sharing this, Maria! This looks like such a wonderful initiative, the website touches on so many vital aspects. I joined and am in! 999,999 to go.
I am so appreciative of having you in my life, Maria.
Teraza "Does this mean evil is loose in the world?" Certainly yes. Of a kind we have not seen before except in small glimpses. This is not accidental or it would have been fixed. No this in intentional genocide perpetrated by the hands of a satanic driven mad man who hates humanity (he depended upon the chain of command of media, academia and circled wagons of institutions around himself to protect "the science" or by the Chinese Communist Party bent on making it easier for their military to take over the world.
Thanks for posting, Arnold. I absolutely agree that everything we're seeing is intentional, and depopulation is a major goal. Is Fauci the mad man or Schwab or someone else? That's what I explore in my last episode. Fauci definitely answers to Gates, but whose dog is Gates? I don't know but I present some options: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-reset-and-ukraine-same-or-different.
I will give it a listen. Maybe its rogue janitor who works at Pfizer and really hates humanity. The problem is all of the institutional infrastructure surrounding this scheme has acted as protection, echo chambers, and like a laser, has amplified the scheme. the hope for humanity is that it burns itself out (like the 3rd Reich did) before it burns down humanity. As the bible says, the Lord Jesus is coming back with flaming fire of vengence.
Tereza, thank you for exploring this topic. I'm curious as to why there aren't so many comments on it? I know for myself, it feels quite overwhelming. I worry about those people in my family who have taken the shots. I am relieved that I stood firm for myself and my son. I wonder about the nature of reality here and if it all truly is a dream, then what is called for us in this time?
I dislike calling people evil as well, and agree that "evil" disempowers people. If it's true "that they're in a race with the clock to set as much death in motion as possible (including the deaths of babies who will never be born) before people make the connection. Pharma profits are just a side-hustle" then how to relate to this intention to kill many people? What is called for us, those who are seeing the situation through this lens?
For me, I'm trying to grow out of my anger in a healthy, deeply authentic way. I'm trying to build intimacy with my husband, who does not want to see the world the way I do. I'm trying to find ways to be more fully myself and less impacted by the world and the choices around me. For me, this is more of an energetic and emotional experience rather than moving to a new location or finding a whole new set of friends. Of course, I'm lucky because half of my friends and family sees covid as I do and either refused the shots, or at least were very understanding of my choices.
This article and video is a great one for an overview of the cancer possibility, and may be a helpful reference point if anyone I know needs an introduction to this topic. Thanks for compiling great resources here.
Thank you for the thoughtful response, Marta. I'm also surprised by the lack of comment and noticed that my YT version (https://youtu.be/ASBcBrFvJh8) only had one line in response. But two people--Colin in NZ and Maria in Aus--emailed me with some very interesting info and initiatives they're part of, and I encouraged them to post in the comments. We need all the clarity and hope we can get.
You ask the million-dollar question and one to which I have no ready answer. It's a daily practice to try to figure out what my role is to respond. This is the first person close to me with a life-threatening diagnosis, and I'm walking a very fine line that I may have overstepped. Here's the horrible dilemma they've placed us in: if my advice is ignored and the worst happens, there will be a sense of 'I told you so', even a sense that I'm somehow pleased to be right. But saying nothing, with what I know, would be prioritizing my relationships over the outcome. There's no question in my mind that this is part of the plan but it doesn't make the decision any easier.
I think your authentic response is a beautiful one. And it makes it clearer that your role doesn't need to be as the bearer of bad news for people around you. I'm sure it's the right path, and one I've chosen also to stay put in my life. We're here for a reason.
Calling a spade a spade is important. We're dealing with evil here in my opinion, and I believe we need to call it out as such. Regarding anger, anger is a real and necessary emotional reaction to a life threatening situation. And that's what we have here: A life threatening situation for all of us. I also know how anger can eat away at a person, so it's important to channel the energy of the anger into actions that confront the life threatening situation, actions that we hope can make a difference. We are in a brave new world, but it's not something that just popped up with covid. It's been a long time in the making. Look at what the Fauci, the FDA and AMA did with AZT, killing at least 300,000. Look at what Pharma has done with chemotherapy for decades and how the FDA has prohibited alternative non-toxic therapies. This killing for profit been a long time coming, but many believe that this time they have overplayed their hand, this time there is a real chance for us to dismantle the whole rotten edifice. God bless you for taking the time to write this article and God bless all who are fighting, doing what we can to destroy this evil.
Thank you, pimaCanyon, and I absolutely agree that "This killing for profit been a long time coming, but many believe that this time they have overplayed their hand, this time there is a real chance for us to dismantle the whole rotten edifice." How could I be angry with anyone who's dismantling the system that's caused so much pain and destruction, even if the role they're playing is the villain? As my book points out, killing for profit and making us complicit in it goes back 3500 years to the invention of coinage. It's finally coming to an end! Hurray! And I get to play the role of the observant bystander, nudging it along. Much more satisfying and enjoyable than having to be the villain.
We're in complete agreement about the facts, I just don't know what the strategy is with labeling people evil. At that point, there's no incentive for them to change their behavior. They're backed into a corner to win or die. If, on the other hand, we take the WEF at face value for believing that the population needs to be drastically reduced to save humanity, looking at the ways in which they've implemented that by objectively tying death rates and birth rates to their policies, we can argue that they're mistaken. It exposes WHAT they're doing by assuming their motives are good. Just my thoughts, but I welcome yours and thanks for reading my article!
Also - I keep reading about all the people who are dying or having side effects but I'm not aware of any people in my life that have obviously died after the vaccines or gotten overt side effects. I take it seriously from health providers who say they are seeing big numbers of people with side effects, and I'm holding the tension that it's not apparent in my real life in any meaningful way so far. Maybe my friends just aren't talking about any effects that they've had?
They are seeming to be sneaky side effects that you cannot prove. "Died suddenly" from climate change (sorry, that's a snarky one). I can't prove that the breast cancer which took my friend (in her 50's) in under 3 months was due to the shot (but I know she took them all). I can't prove that my neighbour in her 50's needed varicose vein surgery because of the shot (and one woman in my class: 2 varicose vein surgeries in 3 months in my small circles), or that her brother's death due to diabetic complications is related. I can't prove that the skin cancers, the constant illness, the fatigue and cog-fog I see around me is from the shot. But I know they all have taken it. All of these unproveable things, I have one death in my circle of friends, and 2 with 2 degrees of separation. (the SFX list is much higher, tracking 45 people with 1 or 2 degrees of separation)
Sorry, I read your second comment first but I meant to connect weather to geo-engineering not climate change. And yes, I'm visiting the person this weekend that I wrote this post about, for the first time since his diagnosis. He's on his second round of chemo.
Later this month I'm going back to my hometown where a neighbor's wife was just going in for heart surgery last time I visited, after months of barely being able to get out of bed. I heard since that she came out with an extremely accelerated heart rate that they said she could either live with or get a pacemaker. I've heard she just got it put in.
For every person I think they're so absorbed with their own tragedy that seeing a pattern isn't their priority and maybe more scary. It would say this wasn't fixable, was maybe intentional, wasn't just a fluke. My heart aches for them and all of us, since there's definitely attacks on the unvaxxed happening too.
What astonishes me, is that the people around me seem to think that this high level of events is normal.
I agree completely. Weather events too. What does it take for people to see a pattern?
Dear Tereza,
I really like your articles! I have to say that I don't always manage to read them as thoroughly as I would like, but I nevertheless find your insightful, elegant but enquiring tone really refreshing. Refreshing because you make a clear coherent argument and allow me space to not only digest it, but also to find out for myself what I think. In the end I might not agree with you on everything , but you have allowed me the freedom to discover this for myself without feeling steamrollered.
Thank you for this - I wish we had more writers and commentators like you in the 'normal' media. Keep going!
Oh Michael, what a very sweet response! and your attitude is all that I would ever hope for. None of us should be easily influenced, aka gullible. And we should choose our dogmas wisely and consciously, and be willing to consider whatever doesn't contradict them. But there's such a wide stretch inbetween. I find myself sometimes having an almost virulent rejection of an idea, only to have the universe present me with it in different forms, again and again until I have to reconsider. And other people change my mind all the time, so please allow me to be part of that internal dialogue anytime you feel you can trust me to not steamroller!
And if you have any busy work to do, that involves your hands but not your head, you might be interested in the video. In this case, it's practically a different episode because it really dives into the socio-spiritual and briefly summarizes the science. Thank you for taking the time to respond and for your kind thoughts!
The CDC in their recent ACIP meeting recommending the bivalent jabs discussed adverse events and the second bullet point on one of the slides about Moderna adverse events said:
"2 participants each experienced two serious adverse events: prostate cancer diagnosis and traumatic fracture within 28 days of the booster dose"
There were 197 men in the trial, so 1 or 2 of them got prostate cancer within 28 days. (While most prostate cancer is slow-growing, this isn't universal).
Notice on the slide how they say "severe" events weren't associated with the Moderna vaccine, but they characterize the prostate cancer as "serious". In FDA-world, these are distinct things.
It could have been sloppy wording, and perhaps these one or two men just happened to have a previously scheduled PSA for right after they got this experimental injection, but to me it's like a Freudian slip and something got out that they were thinking about, but wanted to hide:
Here's the presentation - it's on page 34:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2022-09-01/08-COVID-Oliver-508.pdf
Good for you for reading this closely! I think Steve Kirsch has said the average time the vaccine takes to kill you is 5 months. His usual bluntness, of course, but it's interesting to compare that to a mere 28 day trial period.
Dear Tereza, thank you again for your care, clarity and ability to navigate between the realms of Mind and spirituality
I wanted to share with you the initiative that I am deeply a part of now because I became a board member. The World of Wellness International. It was incorporated last week. It is spearheaded but Professor Ian Brighthope http://www.worldofwellness.life I finally feel that I can stop looking and watching everything and actually participate in the revolution in a practical way.
Without me explaining you can see what it is about on the website which is still fresh and young as the whole organisation is. Ian has been a mover in the integration of Natural medicine, Vic C infusion etc for over 40 years. It is a big job and he is in touch with all the movers and shakers around the world. We need 1,000,000 go join
love gratitude and blessings to you Tereza !!
Thank you for sharing this, Maria! This looks like such a wonderful initiative, the website touches on so many vital aspects. I joined and am in! 999,999 to go.
I am so appreciative of having you in my life, Maria.
Look into taking CDS as an antidote to these rapid onset cancers.
See www.andreaskalcker.com
Teraza "Does this mean evil is loose in the world?" Certainly yes. Of a kind we have not seen before except in small glimpses. This is not accidental or it would have been fixed. No this in intentional genocide perpetrated by the hands of a satanic driven mad man who hates humanity (he depended upon the chain of command of media, academia and circled wagons of institutions around himself to protect "the science" or by the Chinese Communist Party bent on making it easier for their military to take over the world.
Thanks for posting, Arnold. I absolutely agree that everything we're seeing is intentional, and depopulation is a major goal. Is Fauci the mad man or Schwab or someone else? That's what I explore in my last episode. Fauci definitely answers to Gates, but whose dog is Gates? I don't know but I present some options: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-reset-and-ukraine-same-or-different.
I will give it a listen. Maybe its rogue janitor who works at Pfizer and really hates humanity. The problem is all of the institutional infrastructure surrounding this scheme has acted as protection, echo chambers, and like a laser, has amplified the scheme. the hope for humanity is that it burns itself out (like the 3rd Reich did) before it burns down humanity. As the bible says, the Lord Jesus is coming back with flaming fire of vengence.