The Cancer-CoVax Connexion

turbo-cancers & the vaccine: a spiritual, psychological, scientific and social analysis

Another heavy topic today but I promise my next couple will be Light & Fluffy, like my daughter’s favorite bread ;-) I’ve often said that I’d go to the ends of the earth for a real conversation and now, I find real conversations are coming to me from the ends of the earth! And in them, I get to put all my thoughts together and speak without interruption, and have someone give a concise, well-articulated response, as Lyndsey MacPherson did on the YT version of Forgiving Hitler.

She wrote eloquently of her experiences with forgiveness and the “glossy brochures of the official narratives,” which I loved. She’s also the person who gave me the phrase ‘socio-spirituality’ to describe what I’m doing. On the Substack comments, Jack Sirius posted some great quotes and quipped, “Wall, meet Spaghetti.” One of my favorites was Robert Anton Wilson’s “It isn't true unless it makes you laugh” and I think there’s a whole episode in that.

Jack also felt that I came into my own when exploring the nature of reality or the reality of Reality. So I decided to lean into that in the video and start with the Big Picture, and how cancer fits with our conception of ultimate reality. Then I look at the psychological responses to cancer, and the difference between miracles and magical thinking, in which I included Barbara Ehrenreich’s book, Bright-Sided, on the dark side of positive thinking.

I look at how people with life-threatening illnesses become very obedient to authority—one form of magical thinking. But they also feel they need to believe for it to work—another form of magic. So if it doesn’t work, it’s their own fault and the fault of anyone who caused them to doubt the authorized treatment. This could explain the hostility to anyone contradicting the vaccine narrative.

This superstition places informed people who care about those with a potentially fatal illness in an impossible dilemma. As those who read Robert Kennedy’s The Real Anthony Fauci know, gay men didn’t die of AIDS, they died of AZT. Hospitalized patients didn’t die of Covid, but of remdesivir. And cancer patients don’t die of cancer but of chemo. However sowing doubt can be seen as an attack, especially when well-founded.

Here in the text, I dive headfirst into the scientific side of the interaction between cancer and the CoVax, which the video briefly mentions. I’ll quote articles from Etana Hecht’s Clown World, Steve Hirsch and Dr. Ryan Cole. (Thank you, Margaret Anna Alice!) A former Pfizer VP, Dr. Mike Yeadon, responded to me with his conviction that these ‘adverse events’ are by design, not error. Naomi Wolf agrees with him in American Massacre and Russell Brand gives the clue that the alibi preceded the murder. I’ll look at the social aspects of whether this is motivated by profits or something more sinister—and how that ties back to the question of evil.

But I’ll end as the bearer of good news with an interview Dr. Joseph Mercola did of Dr. Nathan Goodyear, whose Scottsdale AZ clinic is using intravenous Vitamin C and hyperthermia with great success against cancers. Let’s get into the bad news and save the good for last.

---

I started asking my network if there was a connection between cancer and the CoVax because someone I know who’s the picture of health was diagnosed out of the blue with metastasized Stage 4 pancreatic cancer. The answer came back in droves. Thank you to Margaret of Through the Looking Glass, who sent me the following references, starting with Etana Hecht’s Clown World—Honk. In this article on Turbo-Cancer, Etana writes:

Dr. Ute Kruger is a researcher and senior physician at Lunds University in Sweden. She’s the former Chief of Pathology, a field that she’s worked in for the last 25 years, with a specialty in breast cancer diagnosis for the past 18 years. She’s studied thousands of autopsies and breast cancer samples. She’s extremely familiar with the industry and patient age, tumor size, and malignancy grade are all within her field of expertise and have had a natural rhythm throughout her career. That natural rhythm came to a halt in 2021 once the vaccine rollout began.

Doctors for Covid Ethics posted an interview with her where she shared her concerns about unusual features that have been showing up in samples from the past year.

• Age - The average ages of the samples she received dropped, with a rise in the number of samples from people in their 30’s-50’s.

• Size - It used to be unusual for Dr. Kruger to find a tumor 3 cm in size. In this new environment, she’s regularly seeing tumors of 4 cm, 8 cm, 10 cm, and the occasional 12 cm. In a shocking anecdote, 2 weeks ago she found a 16 cm tumor that took up an entire breast.

• Multiple Tumors - Dr. Kruger has begun to see more cases of multiple tumors growing in the same patient, sometimes even in both breasts. She had 3 cases within 3 weeks of patients who had tumors growing in multiple organs. One had tumors in his/her breast, pancreas and lungs within months of getting vaccinated.

• Recurrence - There has been an uptick in patients who have been in remission from their cancer for many years, suddenly getting an aggressive recurrence of their cancer shortly after vaccination.

A video interviewing Ute Kruger is available here.

Steve Kirsch writes today that the vaccines take an average of five months to kill someone, based on the Social Security Administration’s master file, obtained from an HHS whistleblower. Their chart tracks increases in excess deaths over baseline from 2020 to 2021 for people from 18 to 55. It builds and peaks at 60% on September 9th while US vaccinations peak at 3.5M on April 12th. He continues:

… this explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out. The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.

In Margaret’s response to my question, she wrote:

Dr. Ryan Cole has been talking about this for a while, and Hospitalist Physician’s Assistant Deborah Conrad describes witnessing people whose cancer had been in remission for years succumbing to cancer so quickly after their injection, they didn’t even have time to get a treatment program together.

One of our clients suddenly developed an aggressive brain tumor that appeared out of nowhere and took her in a couple of weeks. I believe she was in her fifties and had spent her life eating incredibly healthy, doing movement therapy, and living an overall very wellness-centered life.

Regarding Ryan, here is a link from Steve:

Cancers coming back with a vengeance is very common after the COVID vax

In a comment thread, I posted my suspicion that they're in a race with the clock to set as much death in motion as possible (including the deaths of babies who will never be born) before people make the connection. Pharma profits are just a side-hustle. A response from Dr. Mike Yeadon read:

As an ex-big pharma R&D senior, I regret to say there’s not a shadow of a doubt in my mind that the adverse events experienced by many of the “vaccinated” are entirely intentional. Awful to have to say it, but 30+ years in “rational drug design”, preceded by a training in toxicology & an awareness of what this is all about leaves no alternative interpretation. Though I was not able to predict cancers, as I did not then have the sequences in the “vaccines”, mechanisms leading to harms were so conspicuous in the basic design, amplified by formulation choices, that I was confident about Acute anaphylactoid responses, immunological & reproductive health harms that I wrote publicly about these features, with Wolfgang Wodarg, before any such product was even filed with the FDA.

Within three months, we wrote a series of open letters to EMA in relation to the then-obvious clotting & bleeding toxicities. Pathologist Ryan Cole may have been the first to speak publicly about accelerated cancers.

These evil people know exactly what they’re doing. I’m laying this out so starkly because I don’t want anyone thinking “they’ve just been unlucky”. It’s deliberate mass murder.

No one should much care what I think about viruses or masks, but where it comes to the relationship between design of an intended active agent & what it does in humans, I can say without fear of contradiction that there isn’t anybody more capable of reaching that conclusion & being able to defend it rigorously than me.

Until I saw Plandemic3’s Ivermectin: the Truth, in which Mike appears, I didn’t realize he was a former VP of Pfizer (the link goes to his podcast interview by RFK jr). The Ivermectim video also interviews Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Peter McCullough, Chris Martenson and Richard Bartlett. It’s free, short, right to the point, and pulls no punches. Highly recommended.

On Outspoken, Naomi Wolf posted American Massacre. Steve Kirsch Claims "Hundreds of Thousands" of mRNA-Vaccine-related Deaths, "Millions" of Injuries. Is He Right? Here is her answer:

I expect that there may be “hundreds of thousands'' of deaths from the COVID-19 vaccine in the near term in the US because of the way in which the mRNA vaccine directly invites other kinds of deaths — that can’t be directly linked to the vaccine when these deaths or debilities eventually occur. The internal Pfizer documents show side effects of thousands of instances of brain tumors, hemorrhages, strokes, encephalies, neurological issues such as MS, cancers that arise or else come roaring back (SM-102, purportedly in the Moderna vaccine, is an OSHA carcinogen); lung clots, blood clots, thrombocytopenia, epilepsy, liver damage, kidney failure and other horrific, disabling or ultimately murderous problems. … You have a recipe for slow damage, slow and unidentifiable death over time, especially if one accedes to “boosters” — that will look organic or mysterious when the problems manifest.

Anecdotally: in my little town — a surveyor’s wife dropped dead of a stroke. The surveyor himself had a heart attack. A colleague of mine who had lung cancer well in remission, saw her lung cancer come back at a voracious pace; she now is at Stage Four. A colleague’s healthy brother dropped dead. A young adult’s friend dropped dead. A relative has kidney failure. A relative has tachycardia post-booster. A human rights leader dropped dead on a hike. A local community organizer has a thyroid tumor. The beloved volunteer for the local fire department suddenly died. The volunteer for a fire department one town over suddenly died. A relative fainted and hit her head so hard she had to have brain surgery, and she is now incapacitated. A young, healthy counselor at the therapy practice one state over has lung clots. A former colleague has a debilitating condition that she believes is “long COVID”, which I don’t have the heart to tell her corresponds to the side effects in the Pfizer documents. Two formerly healthy friends have myalgia — debilitating muscle pain — which I don’t have the heart to tell them is one of the top two side effects in the Pfizer documents. A health young woman had a “ministroke” while pregnant. Another healthy young adult has crippling joint pain — which is the top side effect listed in the Pfizer documents. …

These folks were all, to my knowledge, mRNA-vaccinated.

Of my friends and colleagues who chose not to be vaccinated? To my knowledge, all are fine. I have not heard of any new serious health conditions or of any fatalities.

So — on balance, Steve Kirsch is right.

And on balance, more importantly, this is a massacre; the stealthiest massacre in American history; a novel kind of massacre; in which hundreds of thousands can be injured, or can even be killed, on a battlefield of which they are unaware; with bullets which they cannot even see; in a war about which they are told — that no evidence exists. 

A recent Russell Brand video quotes the UK Telegraph saying that the effects of lockdowns are killing more people than Covid. Why? Because routine and non-urgent doctor visits were delayed, so now people are dying of undiagnosed neurological and cardiac events, and advanced cancers. While Russell implies there may be more to this, he keeps it in the YT-demilitarized zone. But this makes it very clear they knew this would happen (aka pre-meditated murder) and put forethought into the cover-up, even with the lockdowns.

Does this mean evil is loose in the world? I argue that evil isn’t a useful designation because it induces powerlessness and changes the debate from the issues to the character of the actors. I think we need to be able to look without fear at exactly what’s happening and see also that we can change it. And this time, it could change the whole trajectory …

… as Dr. Nathan Goodyear is doing with cancer treatment. He’s both a medical doctor and Fellow in Functional and Regenerative Medicine and licensed by the Arizona Homeopathic and Integrative Medical Board—something only possible in Arizona and Florida and even then the Boards don’t necessarily like each other. At Brio-Medical, his practice in Scottsdale, AZ, he uses high-dosage Vitamin C given through arterial veins combined with hyperthermia that raises the temperature of the body to saturate the tumors. He combines it with high dose melatonin, an anti-malarial drug and a plant-based diet (about which he and Joe disagreed.)

The interview done by Dr. Mercola is at the lower left of Brio-Medical’s web page. Nathan’s philosophy made intuitive sense to me (“You heal to heal. To destroy to heal isn’t something found in nature.”) But they also geek out on a lot of the technical details, in ways that reassured me they both knew a hell of a lot about physiology. I learned it’s possible to ‘starve’ and shrink a tumor without half-killing the ‘host.’ They write:

In conventional oncology, the concept of making the body less toxic, improving diet and nutrition, and regulating the immune system while treating the malignancy is still widely regarded as an unessential aspect of oncology treatment protocols. The belief that medication alone can and should reverse disease and cure a patient without consideration of the body’s own defense and recovery systems still dominates the medical mentality of conventional oncologists throughout the world of Western Medicine.

In standard oncology, there is no treatment that is not deleterious to the immune system or the overall host defense of the patient. In our concept, the foundation of any form of therapy should be the restoration of the biological capabilities of the host with a specific emphasis on the immune system.

If it were me, I’d be there in a heartbeat.

Edit four months later: Jessica Rose of Unacceptable Jessica just posted an excellent scientific article on how this works, with Immunoglobin G1 being replaced by G4, which is an antibody cell that can reconfigure its ‘arms’ enabling it to tolerate foreign cells, ie cancer, rather than suppress them. Although technical, she uses diagrams to make this understandable. For anyone interested, I highly recommend it:

IgG4 and cancer - a mechanism of action for cancer relapse and onset

---

To keep true to my promise of a little more Light & Fluffy, here’s What’s the Best that can Happen?:

My daughter Cassandra has a new question, "what's the best that can happen?" I apply this to global events and the coup to take over our bodies, minds and world. I share some of the things that give me joy: Rob Brezsny's Love Bombs, Wendall Berry's The Power of Place, David Graeber and David Wengrow's The Dawn of Everything, and Caitlin Johnstone's Confused Species in an Awkward Transition Phase.

and this is Tony Robbins is Working Too Hard & Aiming Too Low:

Responds to Russell Brand's interviews of the incomparable motivational speaker Tony Robbins and concludes that he's working too hard and aiming too low. From a socio-spiritual perspective, I study A Course in Miracles but Tony lives it, citing firewalking as one example. When Tony says, I'm not under the delusion I can change the world, Russell asks, why not? From the socio-economic perspective of my book, How to Dismantle an Empire, I show why changing anything is harder than changing everything.