This is excellent work Tereza, there are quite a few details to examine regarding the history of Judea. The Talmud is likely a work that came from the Khazarian culture, the Pre-Jewish Khazarians were a blood thirsty type; they were ritual cannibals, they practiced institutionalized pedophilia and many forms of criminal behavior.
Most of the people in positions of control in Israel are people who can trace their lineages back to Khazaria, which is now known as Ukraine. Actually, a majority of the people in charge in the US are also of the same ilk. There are a lot of Jews who are really against Israel and are currently protesting the effort to create this new war footing. Turns out that the truly Semitic people of Palestine are the Palestinians themselves by a factor of 80%.
I guess that kinda makes Israel an Anti Semitic farce of a country.
Thanks for that additional insight, Nefahotep. I was just watching Max Blumenthal interview Ilan Pappe on his book, The Ten Myths of Israel: https://youtu.be/qxQNk81ELbI. He talks about settler colonialism and how Israel has reversed who is indigenous and who is the invader. They do this using the Torah as history. So it seemed like it might be useful to take the Torah at 'face' value and use its own words to show the immorality even within its own justification.
What was the era when the Khazarians developed their 'culture'?
Khazaria grew out of the collapse of the Gokturk Empire. Khazarian people are of Scythian origin. Around the 8th century, the king of Khazaria force converted all of his people into Judaism, apparently in order to appease his neighbors. But he did not change the culture of his people, as they continued to do blood sacrifice, and child rape. Finally, completely fed up, approx around 1100 AD, Russia and Persia joined forces and destroyed Khazaria. But the Elites of Khazaria had spies and caught wind of the Czar's plan. It is said that they escaped to Western Europe and are the origin of Rothschild and other families.
I think that the 13 bloodlines may have come from Khazaria but they made that diaspora over a long time, many of them are original Roman Senator families.
An outstanding essay, and exceptionally well written, too. It deserves to be read 2 or 3 times. Yes, the history and current events here are built on lies seemingly every which way. Thanks, Tereza.
Thank you, Dave. I did pack a lot of information into this one. I think you would also like the documentary The 13 Sugar Colonies. I think they kept the YT description vague so it wouldn't be taken down but it presents black scholars showing that Jews were at the forefront of the transatlantic slave trade. It was a history that was new to me. As you say, so many lies.
"...that Jews were at the forefront of the transatlantic slave trade."
Banking too. You'd be shocked (or maybe not...it was the usual suspects) at the source of money behind the American "Revolution." I am no expert on the subject and don't have all the details, but what I've found no longer surprises me.
Jefferson referred to them as "Amsterdam bankers." Then there was a guy named Haym Soloman who did a lot of financing and to whom several of the "founders" were apparently indebted.
"I cannot in any way make you more sensible of the importance of your kind attention to pecuniary remittances for me than by informing you that I have for some time past been a pensioner on the favor of H. S. Haym Solomon a Jew Broker."
From James Madison to Edmund Randolph, 27 August 1782
VERY interesting, Geoff. I often forget about the Dutch in the Dutch East India Company, strange though that seems. The documentary goes into the Dutch Jew connections (why do we say 'Jewish' when we don't say Christianish or Hinduish?)
The financing of the AM Rev is fascinating as are the motives of the prominent advocates of the constitution.
I've been "multi-tasking" while listening to the vid and am about half way through. I find it as admirable as well as true that several times the narrator mentioned that it was not all Jews but the rich ones that were slave profiteers and that they hid behind various names, such as Spaniards and Anglo-Saxons.
And it's my (largely unproven but not entirely off the wall) suspicion that the USA as we know it today was begun and still functions as a project of those who profitted in the slave trade and other money grubbing trades such as the addiction ones (sugar, opium and the like) including those we know as the pharmaceutical and the "food" processig industries we're poisoned by today.
The history of opium is very interesting as well and it also ties in with the cotton and textile industry and trade. Same tribe involved with those. Similar methods of wringing profits out of the masses of humanity too.
The video confirms and supplements many of my suspicions. Your article is a real gem.
I like and share your suspicions. Of course, IF you ever get my book, you'll see the first section is Pieces of Slave and I argue that it's what the monetary system was designed to do since the invention of coinage, and what it does to this day. That's why you can't fix anything without replacing it with an actual system of exchange and community reciprocity.
I fully intend to get your book, but I have to find an acceptable source. and as you know, it does not begin with the letter, "A," which emits the distinct odor of an over capitalized monstrosity and, I suspect, is anti-"actual system of exchange and community reciprocity" in intent, concept, delivery and execution (puns intended).
An interesting corollary to that was the adoption of slavery in about the 10th(?) century by the Moslems when they became addicted to sugar and didn't like how hard it is to make.
I think that there is a sugar-history that would be good to look at because the sugar 'traders' are likely amongst the most powerful with the chains of dynastic power. Sugar was invented in India around 500BC.
A great introduction to that is 'The Case Against Sugar' by Gary Taubes.
Thanks for sharing that, Guy! I talk some about sugar in my book from a text called Sweetness and Power, and a couple of other sources. It's definitely key. I'll look at Gary Taubes, whose name is familiar. I wonder if I've read him before.
You may have met Taubes he has an interesting history of research around health. His sugar book is about health and the links between the expansion of the sugar empire and ill health. Really well done. And, of course, that sugar may likely have been the first of the agents to capture health regulatory agencies and universities.
And your discussion included a lovely little synchronicity with an encounter with Ismael on the bus yesterday.
Nov 5, 2023·edited Nov 5, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Another tour de force, Tereza. Thank you.
Given the ubiquitous lies and deceptions which infest the subject, do we know who really wrote the Talmud? Was it Jews, or Name Stealers or others hiding behind a Jewish identity? Khazarians?
With regard to the Jewish-Roman wars, an interesting angle is that Rome was founded by descendants of the non-Judaic so-called "Lost" Ten Tribes of Israel. After leaving captivity in Assyria, they migrated north and west through Asia Minor. After The Trojan War (which took place around 650 BC, not six hundred years earlier), two groups of refugees left Anatolia. One group sailed to Etruria and went on to found Rome. The other, led by Brutus of Troy, went to Britain and founded New Troy, which we now know as London. Doesn't this shed an interesting light on the relationship between Zion, The Vatican and The City of London?
Very much so, Tirion. I'm not sure we can even talk about 'the Jews' as followers of a religion from Judea without clarifying which religion from Judea. There are the Shemites, which I'd use to describe those who believe in the Torah's entitlement to the sons of Shem. There are the Sadducees who rejected the Torah and were 'prey' to the robbers/ rebels who rejected Roman rule. There was the Jesus cult who believed they inherited the right to 'go out and subdue the nations.' And there were the gnostics, the Fourth Philosophy and the zealots. Will the real Judaism please stand up?
The Talmud is definitely Rabbinical Judaism, elevating the writings of these rabbis to scripture. But like the gospels, I'm going back to the foundational stories of the Torah and they still stink. So I don't think that branch of religion needs to have been corrupted. Although I'd love to get my eyeballs on the Dead Sea Scrolls that Israel is hoarding and see if there's a reason the scholars who studied them committed suicide.
"With regard to the Jewish-Roman wars, an interesting angle is that Rome was founded by descendants of the non-Judaic so-called "Lost" Ten Tribes of Israel. "
Interesting claim there. I'm currently reading Macchiavelli's "Florentine Histories" and that very question has popped into my mind about both Rome and the subsequent political entities. it's quite unbelieveable what went on in Florence and Italy in general 5 or 6 centuries ago. It apparently hadn't changed much from what went on in the vicinity for millenia previously.
I followed your link and found that you are correct; I am interested.
"The English people were persuaded to forget their British roots and instead become Germanic “Anglo-Saxons”. The Welsh, Scottish and Irish were also to lose their glorious pasts and be told that they came from primitive “Celtic” tribes.
This campaign of mis-information was so successful that few people today are even aware that these changes ever happened."
Why am I not surprised??
I'm pretty sure that Herodotus and Thucydides claimed, and took pains, to ensure that their histories were perceived as valid too. I wonder why that would be...wink, wink!
I'm going to purchase the book as soon as I post this and pseaking of Thucydides, I don't think TC could be accused of being among the vulgar.
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand."
Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War, Book I, 1.21-[3], 431 BC
Yes, it's complete nonsense/propaganda to describe even the English as "Anglo-Saxon," let alone the Welsh, Scots and Irish - who, in turn are not Celtic either! Only a small minority of the English, mainly in Kent and East Anglia, have Anglo-Saxon heritage. It's a myth intended to bolster the weak legitimacy of The House of Hanover/Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Windsor.
"I am the Lord thy God and I honor cheats and liars. This is the redundant theme of the Torah."
What an excellent way to cut to the heart of it. I don't think I've ever read any article so "information dense." and your piece deserves to be read and studied multiple times. And thank you for taking us down several more rabbit holes! : )
Tereza, you write many things that don’t understand and have no knowledge of and which I therefore can’t at present comment on. BUT I can’t help but comment on your seemingly throwaway remarks about Christ. I do not agree with you on this - yes of course Christianity (Churchianity) has had a bloody ignominious 2000 year history, but behind that imperfect religion lies the impulse of the Christ. Perhaps most simply described as pure selfless love. If you read Steiner - which I know you do, you will see that this Christ impulse is central to his whole philosophy. Without going into detail ( please ask if you want more detail) Steiner says that the tragedy of the Jewish people is that their task was to bring the Christ impulse to birth and then gently let go of their sense of self as a race. Their task was complete when the Christ incarnated. The Christ impulse of pure selfless love, totally areligious and non denominational, was and is supposed to permeate the whole of the Earth. The tragedy of today in Palestine is that Zionism still holds on to their mission, waiting for the Messiah, the Christ, not recognising the reality of 2000 years ago. They are still waiting for him to incarnate and in their minds it will be in Jerusalem.
And just to add to the confusion- the American Evangelists are waiting for the second coming of Christ - also to incarnate in Jerusalem. So a potent brew of false hope - money and power mixed together waiting for something that will not happen. ( Steiner was very clear - Christ will not incarnate again in a human body).
I’m sorry this is complicated and probably not accurately represented but felt I needed to put at least something out there, however imperfect .Accessing Steiner’s thoughts on this subject is quite easy - just search online, nothing is hidden. And then you can make an informed decision for yourself.
Thank you, Michael, for putting your thoughts out there and not rejecting the other things I say, when this is an important topic for you. The place I would start is with the question, is the Christ a what or a who? In first century Judea, this was an open question. To the gnostics and Sadducees, along with A Course in Miracles today, the Christ-mind is a way of perceiving that sees the equal value and good in everyone. It's equally accessible to all.
There are two parts to the story of Jesus in the gospels: the ideology of pure selfless love that you (and Steiner) describe beautifully as the Christ-impulse and the historical details, including the name. In which one do you place your faith? If your faith is in selfless love, I can tell you that everything you love about Jesus and more is true, but his name was Judas. If your faith is in the historical details, I have to say that the person who invented the story of Jesus was one of the most selfish, egotistical and malevolently cruel people to have lived. Without the psyops of replacing our pure love and faith in each other with the story of one man who was better than all the rest of us put together, the 2000 year bloody ignominious history could never have happened.
I admire Steiner but don't accept the authority of anyone else to tell me what or how to think.
The other aspect of your question is the theological. It assumes a God who could intervene in the world but chooses not to, allowing if not causing suffering, loss and death. God's intervention was to send the one more beloved to him than all of us together (even though we're supposedly also God's children) to suffer and die in the most painful way possible (like tens of thousands of others at the same time, whose deaths didn't matter to God) so that he would forgive humanity for ... something.
From the perspective of the Course, God can't intervene because this world is our dream, not real. The Christ-mind recognizes the Christ in everyone else. The Jesus-mind says, "Believe in me, not yourself or other people." These are mutually exclusive, imo. I talk about this in some early episodes pre-Substack on this playlist, but I'll write more about it soon: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS5WYJBpd75viFQXENZZXVjxzxpXHipmQ.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment and giving me space to respond.
Hi Tereza, quite a lot to tease apart on a Sunday evening, but here goes...
Steiner: I don't believe everything he says, BUT I have great respect and trust in much of what he says - particularly Waldorf schools, Biodynamic agriculture, holistic medicine, the causes of the First World War, reincarnation and karma, nature spirits, and angels to name but a few. Because these subjects have found deep resonance within me and help me understand the world like no other person can, I have learnt to respect Steiner's utterances. this is why I suggest looking into his understanding of Christ.
the Christ Story: (from Steiner). the Jewish race were the carriers of the Jesus body into whom Christ incarnated at AD 30 (Jordan baptism). Christ lived for 3 years on earth then was crucified. This had to happen to enable the Christ to fully connect to the Earth and to help it and us transform into a higher spiritual reality (as the Earth was becoming too materialised). The necessary shadow forces to bring this about were embodied in Judas.
Since the crucifixion and resurrection Christ lives in the etheric realm of the Earth and can be accessed by all of us as pure selfless love, (irrespective of religion, class, power, geography, race etc).
You are correct that there is no historical proof of Christ ( freely admitted by Steiner! see Lecture "How do I find the Christ?") he uses the argument (which can of course be shot down by rationalists) that because this was a spiritual event it has to be understood spiritually and needs no physical proof! "How convenient!"I hear you say and to that I have no answer but this:
Yes its crazy, ridiculous, historically incorrect, logically flawed (God sending a son to die etc), but for me and for many others (maybe check out Gigi Young) it RESONATES with my sense for truth, or at least with my sense for 'something-not-being-totally-wrong-and-needing-more-investigation'. it helps makes sense of the world today for me, especially, as I said already, the tragedy of the Jewish people.
Personally, I think the inability to entertain the idea of a pure selfless Christ impulse will cause much trouble for the future, as humanity will only be able to look at the world through a materialistic logical lens. This logical lens will continue the medical tyranny, political strife and tribal wars over 'territory', etc. and will not be helpful for us to feel hope, love and confidence for the future. This hope, love and confidence is for vital if we are transform ourselves and all the beings of the Earth out of this deep place of materialism which we find ourselves in today. Perhaps for this reason alone it might be worth a little further investigation?
We're in full agreement about Steiner, and I remember you were the one who told me about The Karma of Untruthfulness. I'm halfway through Vol 1 and should get back to it. I appreciate you alerting me to him.
And we're in full agreement about the idea of a pure selfless Christ impulse. If Steiner had everything right, however, you and I would be redundant. There would be no need for us to be born. Steiner made that statement as a mystic about the Jesus body reincarnating in 30 AD and living 3 years. He contradicts the gospels, of course, and so rejects the historical Jesus. Yet he keeps the name, Judas as shadow, and the agony of the crucifixion.
I grew up in a house with crosses and pictures of a bleeding Jesus in practically every room and it never resonated with me. I have no desire for my daughters to suffer to prove their love for me. It doesn't make sense that God would.
If we keep the non-materialism and hope, love and confidence for the future, but leave out a God that requires sacrifice, we would agree. The Course is a channeled text from the Christ. And entertaining the possibility that we're One and the world is our dream--it doesn't get more non-materialistic than that. I think that we agree on all of the important points.
Nov 6, 2023·edited Nov 6, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Tereza, many good points, all well made, as always.
Thank you !
And yes, I think I was a little ‘trigger- happy’ with my use of the word ‘materialism’. As you rightly say the Course in Miracles is definitely not in this camp. So apologies… I must be channeling my ‘inner missionary ’from a previous incarnation 😂.
Ooh your experience of Christianity in childhood sounds painful and unhelpful… and what a strange message you were given that Christ had to prove his love to God. But I can totally see where that arises in the narrative and I will meditate upon that further.
I agree that we should keep transforming the Earth with those bits of the narrative that we do agree on, which are many.
NB have you come across Steiner’s ideas on social threefolding? -Sisterhood/Brotherhood in the economic realm, Freedom in the cultural/spiritual realm ( including education and medicine) and Equality in the rights realm. An impossible ideal or the only hope for humanity to get out of the political left/right political power dynamic (which means nothing any more)?
Thanks for that kind response, Michael. My parents were sincere Catholics, my mom refusing to marry a very wealthy man until he had his previous marriage annulled but after years of trying, he suddenly married someone else. For my dad, I'm sure his religion enabled him to break the cycle of abuse, since he came from a family of wife-beaters. They were never hypocritical about their faith, but it was the most important factor in their lives.
I went to Catholic grade school, HS and college, which I entered as a religion major but changed later. In my 40's I decided to have an adult relationship with the religion of my childhood and started studying world religions and scripture analysis in earnest. Since I don't do anything halfway, this included the int'l conference of Bible scholars and their work.
I don't believe the conclusions I've come to from my study are reactive or emotional (not that you're implying that.) I've been puzzling through contradictions in Christianity my whole life, but it was a surprise to me--one I was reluctant to acknowledge--when I realized the whole story of Jesus was a fiction and, furthermore, one written by and for the empire.
I wouldn't say this without a mountain of evidence. I certainly wouldn't even want you to agree. Just to suspend certainty for a moment, and consider that it's possible. If it's a necessary step for you in the healing of the world, as it turned out to be for me, it will present itself in other ways in your life. But I didn't need to heal myself from any religion-induced trauma. I'm grateful to my parents for having left me with little baggage so I can focus outward.
And no, I haven't heard of social threefolding, but it sounds fascinating! I'll look for that. Is there an online source?
"The Christ impulse of pure selfless love, totally areligious and non denominational..."
While I don't consider myself a Christian, I have held the view you stated for a long time; it's pretty obvious that he did not come to found a religion. The so called religion is obviously a manipulative construct created by those who had the will and ability to pervert whatever his philosophy was.
Anyway, I do like the part where he took a switch to the money changers and I think there may be a lesson there somewhere!
Who is 'he'? Please give biographical details that would identify this particular person--name, parents, date of birth, place of birth, life events, quotes, circumstances and date of death.
And I will tell you why those details can't possibly be true because they conflict with other historical events, historical figures or even geography and archeology. Of the statements attributed to Jesus, 87% have been voted invalid by the international convention of Bible scholars called The Jesus Seminars. They present evidence, then vote. These are often things that had already been said by other people or parables with tropes, idioms and plays on words that don't work in any language but Greek.
It isn't really a throwaway line for me to say Jesus is a literary character, not a historical person, but it will take at least one volume to present the evidence. But to your specific example of taking a switch to the money changers, at the time that story was first written (post-70 CE) the robbers/ rebels had made the Temple of Jerusalem their headquarters. The gospels mention the high priests by name killed 'between the altar and ?' that happened 40 yrs after Jesus' supposed death. They had turned the temple into a 'den of thieves.'
Did Judea, after they'd thrown off the yoke of Roman subservience, continue to use Roman coins for internal exchange? Would you do that? They'd have to be fools to keep their commerce dependent on imperial money, which the Hellenic traitors had roomfuls of stashed in the Temple, while the peasants had none. So in this story that couldn't have happened without a time machine to kill the high priests and go back 40 yrs, Jesus is metaphorically scourging the creators of a community currency. Maybe one just like mine ;-)
The "he" I'm talking about is the guy we've all heard about of course.
And of course "he" is mythical, which is only one reason why I am areligious. However, even the Christ of the common myth was never presented as far as I know of, as someone who came to found or institute a religion. Now even though this particular guy was a undoubteldy a myth, there have nevertheless been many other "anointed" ones who met similar ends and they never wrote anything down nor did they care about founding a religion, so there's that. E.g., Socrates probably existed and his story parallels in many ways that of the subject at hand, I think.
Anyway, still like the part where he (supposedly)drove the money changers out of the temple and I also still think there's a lesson in there somewhere. Oh, and if the myth said a woman came to deliver us from evil, I'd still think there would be a message (and a good one at that), if she took a broom and smacked the Pharisees with it and swept them out of the temple too.
So if you're admitting here that 'Jesus' is a literary invention, who wrote the story and why? As I keep saying, there are only two sides: empire vs. sovereignty. Since scholars have established it was written or orally transmitted in Greek, including the quotes attributed to 'Jesus,' it's a story written by the Roman Empire to invent a false peasant hero. It couldn't crush the rebellion with fear or violence, so it had to psychologically manipulate them.
Remember what I've said about controlled opposition being a sheepdog leading back to the slaughterhouse through a different path. It's not an accident that the 'Jesus' story led to 2000 years of imperialism with the 'holy Roman empire' at the pyramid's peak. Like money, it's worked exactly as it was designed.
The Pharisees were the priests of the people, not the elite. Zadok / Sadduc was a Pharisee, and the high priest of the revolution was a Sadducee. It's not about women vs. men, it's that 'Jesus' represents the side of empire and you're being tricked into siding with it too and celebrating violence against peasants fighting (successfully!) for sovereignty.
"Jesus' represents the side of empire and you're being tricked into siding with it."
I was partly being a smart (bleep) and messing with you with that crack about women, but you may have a point there about the Pharisees , and it wouldn't be the first time I "spoke" without thinking, but I was using in the snese of "Hypocritically self-righteous and condemnatory," and I was also operating under the illusion that they were tax collectors and oppressors of the peasants.
It wouldn't be the first time that things are the opposite of what they've been made out to be, would it? Thanks for pointing that out.
(Banned)Nov 5, 2023·edited Nov 5, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Once again, we're are completely reading the same paragraph in the same chapter, in the same book and in very similar if not the exact same ways. Most of history and "da newz" are literary inventions as well.
My original comment was directed at demonstrating a separation between the story and at least a couple of religions with innumerable offshoots no less..
Who wrote the story? There are many stories and many people wrote them and everyone has her different interpretation of them as you are well aware. It's a big and contradictory mishmash to boot.
Anyway, what next? Are you going to spill the beans that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are myths as well?
Very powerful, especially combined with the startling and eye-opening The 13 Sugar Colonies video. I am so grateful you included that! It really is important. I was totally oblivious to everything it disclosed.
I'm busy writing my next essay, in the form of a sort of letter to my dead father. Your essay and your sharing the 13 Sugar Colonies video have unexpectedly worked their way into that epistle! A lovely synchronicity as my epistle is taking unexpected turns around Los Días de Los Muertos.
And here I will double flag the high importance of The 13 Sugar Colonies! This IS an important documentary that totally destroys the myth around who was and wasn't responsible for the slave trade. We are living in the time of the great unveiling, and so let us open the doors to rooms that once were hidden from us and with eyes to see let us look behind this particular slave door to discover the deliberately hidden history of significant, central role the wealthy Jews had in the slave trade from start to finish. This is such an important video to watch. And many of the Caribbean pirates were Jewish. So fascinating.
If we are to wake up, I mean really wake up to the history that has brought us into convidiana and our coming to be alive during an active holocaust likely far bigger than the one even of the blacks and indigenous Americans, it serves us ill to remain blinded by the popular delusion fed to us like pabulum as if it is history. That includes the astounding denials of 9/11, JFK, America's financing and equipping of Hitler, the 'true' effectiveness and purpose of vaccination, who mostly benefitted from slavery and why, the shady truth of key elements of the Bible that don't bear up under close scrutiny, the real 1st world war, and on and on.
Did you ever read Orwell's 'Homage to Catalonia'? Also an important book, about his experience of being a volunteer fighter for democracy in Spain and his acute powers of observation noting the difference between what was reported and 'reality.' Fantastically written, and also important in this age of OMG! So much important stuff to read. Well, time to finish late supper dishes and get back to the epistle.
Thank you! I'll be linking to this substack in my own.
Have I said lately how proud I am to claim you and Geoff as friends, Guy? You are both such remarkable, knowledgable people. I'm honored that you'll include this video in your essay and I look forward to hearing how it ties in with your father. I'm grateful to Julius Skoolafish for posting it and I think you'd like his Book Reviews, both of you.
My latest video has Días de Los Muertos marigolds in it that were given to me by my daughter's Oaxacan boyfriend. Synchronicity!
And I haven't read Homage but one of the most powerful and heartbreaking books I've ever read was Spain in Our Hearts by Adam Hochschild: https://youtu.be/-Vuf9UBITFM?si=BO4FWjEKHEvw08wP. Absolutely critical history! And love the Shooting an Elephant quote, Geoff.
Egualmente! You are providing great resources and challenges to those pesky truth-traps somewhere in this thing called Guy's fields of unconscious beliefs. This takes me all the way back to Seth's 'The Nature of Personal Reality' where he discussed the importance of what he called 'core beliefs'; the truths which are hidden in the same way we imagine fish unable to describe water because it is effectively invisible to them except at the liminal edges. And the 'great' thing about hidden beliefs is that even when we hold totally contradictory beliefs, we are oblivious to them except in how the are made manifest in our physical and somatic experiences.
(Banned)Nov 7, 2023·edited Nov 7, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Great comments there! Agree with all.
Speaking of Orwell, another fine piece of work is the short story, "Shooting an Elephant".
" Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd – seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. And my whole life, every white man's life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at. ”
Yes, this is one of those standout pieces of writing in my life as well. Thank you for bringing this forward back from my distant past. I will revisit it.
I can read that but <i> I have to </i> learn more Spanish (and French...my pronunciation is tres horrrible!) ! (Did you see what I did there? I bet you can tell what I've just been reading. Wink, wink!)
LOL! "Have to" and the spell of the bully! I suspect that you are reading not Montaigne in the original 16th century French, perhaps something about the word spells keeping us disempowered! I look forward to any thoughts you might add to that!
Muchas gracias, as I jump into my morning Spanish.
If you are interested in Spanish I highly recommend Marcus Santamaria's Shortcut To Spanish online. Let me know and I'll seen a link and you can check it out. (Me and my friend are loving it,. My goal is to be fluent before the end of December. And it might happen!)
Oh I hadn't heard of Curse of Canaan. Yet another reason to admire Mullins! Thank you for that kind comment. This did feel like an important piece that I'd been mulling over for several days.
Nov 7, 2023·edited Nov 7, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Hola, Tereza.
Have you been tracking Free on Bitchute? Often she is interesting with very interesting guests.
This is 'nice' — sorry, that is really a very funny joke, sort of — video with guests Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben. She has had them on before to track the history of the Babylonian money cartels who line up perfectly with Clif High's description of the history of the khazarian mafia, as he calls them. You will certainly want to track back to them, if you haven't already done so.
This time they are talking about Israel, Gaza, the UK monarchy as owners of Israel, the Pilgrim Society.
While Netanyahu proclaims a Biblical right to raze Gaza, The Cartel Babylon Banksters run the global perception deception from the City of London in the attempt to kick off WW3 and consolidate planetary control of humanity. The Cartel Babylon series is back!
Analysis and discussion with Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel! We, the People, are Awake to their satanic plan and are uniting in prayer and Godly Intention to turn away from and defeat the satanic globalists!
Nov 6, 2023·edited Nov 6, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
Whether it is the torah, the bible, or the quran the same kind of attitude prevails towards the 'other': get rid of him/her. This largely explains that. Our 'civilization' is based on those scriptures and that doesn't help the cause unless these types of morality carry on serving an agenda which end is a perpetual denial of a modus vivendi/modus operandi based on equality for all. I know I simplify but at this point I can't help being delusioned about this species that is supposedly the smartest.
And you could certainly include the Hindu scriptures of superiority. Yes, your point is well made that these scriptures form the basis of our 'civilization' and embed a morality of rulers-servants-slaves with unequal rights or even humanity. Those who reject the religions, like Darwin, still assume the inherent superiority that's the uneven terrain underneath.
I disagree, however, with your and Geoff's conclusions. Once you understand that this 3500 yr old psyops underlies every element of our culture, who would we be without it? I don't think we can pretend to know. Our every waking/ sleeping moment is dominated by this narrative--one that says God is great and people are stupid, evil and inferior to us.
I would also reverse what you're saying Geoff. To say that God's children or even God's creations are flawed is to insult God as flawed. If God is perfect then so must people be. If God doesn't exist then people are the product of nature and nurture, still perfectly innocent.
"To say that God's children or even God's creations are flawed is to insult God as flawed."
While God may not be flawed, who can argue that "our" view of he, she, or it certainly has to be? And who can argue that humans are perfect or even not flawed by any reasonable measure? And that's the point of my criticizing the view that we are made in the image of something perfect, i.e., it's an insulting a(and delusional) conceit, I think.
"If God is perfect then so must people be."
I cannot follow that logic.
"If God doesn't exist then people are the product of nature and nurture, still perfectly innocent."
One must "ahem" define "innocent," I'd think. Maybe JC was correct when he asked his dad to forgive us for we know not what we do. I guess that pretty well fits one definition of the word.
Anyway, I better get my butt back in the garden where I battle to bring some order out of never ending chaos and to obtain a harvest wrung from unremitting challenges!
As the self-appointed public defender of people, I'm here to answer your question "who can argue that humans are perfect or even not flawed by any reasonable measure?"
If you had a dog that had been trained to attack little girls and it killed a little girl, would you say dogs were flawed, that breed of dog, or even that dog in particular? You would look at the circumstances and figure out why. Perhaps you'd conclude that dogs weren't meant to live with humans, or that breed, or that the dog needed to be put down, but you would see it as a combination of its nature and its nurture. Why are humans different?
JC asked his father to forgive the Roman soldiers who had mistaken him for one of the insurgents. The 'good thief/ rebel' says, 'This guy was never one of us.' And the 'bad thief/ rebel' says, 'I did it and I'd do it again because people deserve to be free.' When you realize that JC is Josephus, the God who is his Father by adoption is Caesar Vespasian, who he had acknowledged as the Messiah. So the thief who says Josephus never rebelled will be welcomed into the Roman Empire but the one who believes in Judean sovereignty deserves to die and be damned.
(Banned)Nov 7, 2023·edited Nov 7, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
"As the self-appointed public defender of people..."
I knew it; I'm wrong again. There is a messiah! Wink!
So the thief who covers for Josephus is welcomed into the kingdom of "heaven" while the other is not, meanwhile Josephus rises from "the dead" and ascends into "heaven," aka the empire. It surely seems to fit.
I like your views on things. Very interesting and I never had it explained that way or considered it. Fortunately I'm certainly no enemy to novelty. And yer version is as usual not only more plausible than the the standard, but more fascinating as well.
Haha! The possibility I'm entertaining is that the premise of A Course in Miracles, that the world is our collective dream, was discovered by Zadok and Judas and proven to themselves. They could therefore demonstrate to everyone else that the world had no power over them, meaning everyone, not just Z&J. So resurrection was inclusive and no big deal.
What really happened with Josephus is something I keep wondering. His 'brother' Titus made him, the ultimate traitor, go into Jerusalem under siege to 'negotiate.' Was Titus aiming to get him killed? One account says the zealots shot arrows at him but he escaped. Another says Titus barely escaped. Did he go in too?
So I think resurrecting was street cred, that not doing it was a clear indication of being an imposter. The tomb where he was 'buried', owned by the wealthy Joseph of Arimathea, would be Joseph son of Matthew, which parallels the gospels and the family names of Josephus, I'd bet.
Holy smokes. This stuff is way outta my area of expertise, although I've always suspected that most of it was ahuge con job, like a lot of other things!
Interesting. I wish I had teh time to dig into it but I'm already into so many rabbit holes you'd think I was lost in a Parisian subway!
I'm paraphrasing someone: if we are trying to resolve a problem with the same tools that created it in the first place we will end up solving nothing. I like David Cayley who throughout his career as a radio documentarist tried to analyse things in different angles. I found his series 'The Myth of the Secular' very well done and decided to do its 7 hour audio transcription. He is finalizing the corrections. There are many more series he did with transcriptions available. https://www.davidcayley.com/podcasts/category/Myth+of+the+Secular
"...I can't help being delusioned about this species that is supposedly the smartest."
You are singing my song there! I say that the idea that some think they're special is little more than an infantile delusion. And the idea that humans are made in the image of gawd is another. It's also at the very least an insult to whatever supreme characters exists.
Very interesting comments about the sugar industry and its domination. Let us not forget who dominated the opium trade and what they did and are apparently still doing.
I've made it thru about 20 mins of the vid, and it is excellent. Don't know if I can make it thriu 3 hours tho!
I had a lot of cleaning to do before I left my AirBnB. Manual labor is your friend! It also has an audio file in the link above, if that helps. But it does repeat, so no worries.
I could not agree more. It's also our liberator (despite the usual sarcasm used to impugn the concept) and I was reading on another site that it cures depression. No wonder I'm a stranger to that unfortunate state of affairs!
Yes, I remember you're an able practitioner in the church of hard work. But as I remember, that was mostly outside, which makes it tricky to watch videos. It's why my dream is to bring back radio!
The last time I listened to the radio was long ago on a very boring road trip. I turned the thing on and happened to land on a Rush Limbuagh rant which I listened to for about 2 minutes and shut the thing off in disgust since he sounded like a really deranged lunatic. Little did I know that the drugs he was taking probably contributed to his moronic bombast not that I'm making excuses for that pathetic piece of blustring insanity and purveyor of canned ignorance and falsehoods. Anyway, I shut if off and never turned it on again.
Among the few things I care to listen to any longer are my wife's and my grandkids' voices and the sound of the birds, insects, and the breezes. Used to love classical music, but hardly ever listen to it anymore. (PS: In that regard ever notice how our owners subtly make fun of it by using it in animated cartoons? What a bunch of fetid cloacas that clan is!) Never have owned a teevee or subscribed to much printed media and the ones I had subscribed to I quit back in the '80s after realizing that most of it was recycled balderdash similar to the mindless hogwash presented in skoolz but with much superior graphics.
I have posted Jefferson's very similar pronouncements here already so i won't repost.
Beautifully said. Jonathon of What Do I No? posted something similar on enjoying those around you. And yes, all media has been made insipid but it doesn't have to be that way. I'll include the rest of my rant in today's video.
Well, thank you but I never dreamed that "beautiful" would apply to my, "bunch of fetid cloacas," but I think it would be more accurate to say it was eloquent!😁 In any case, I'll take any positive reinforcement I can get!
You know, speaking of that, I cannot get it out of my mind how well thought out and written your constitution con article is. It is the best of all the things I've read on the subject or at least on par with what some of the "anti-federalists" (gawd, I cringe whenever I hear, speak, read or write that term for the very reason you so perceptively mentioned in your article) wrote.
This is the best substack that I'm aware of. Thank you.
this information is in a format you may prefer , verbal and written.
Myron Fagan: The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations (1967)
BY RHODA WILSON ON JANUARY 4, 2024 •
The question of how and why the United Nations is the crux of the great conspiracy to destroy the sovereignty of the United States and the enslavement of the American people within a UN one world dictatorship is a complete and unknown mystery to the vast majority of the American people.
The reason for this unawareness of the frightening danger to our country and to the entire free world is simple. The masterminds behind this great conspiracy have absolute control of all of our mass communications media especially television, the radio, the press and Hollywood.
Myron C. Fagan: The Illuminati and the C.F.R [Council of Foreign Relations] (1967)
Illuminati
Encyclopedia Britannica
Illuminati, designation in use from the 15th century, assumed by or applied to various groups of persons who claimed to be unusually enlightened. The word is the plural of the Latin illuminatus. According to adherents, the source of the “light” was viewed as being directly communicated from a higher source or due to a clarified and exalted condition of the human intelligence. To the former class belong the Alumbrados (Spanish: “enlightened”) of Spain. Spanish historian Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo first finds the name about 1492 (in the form aluminados, 1498) but traces them back to a gnostic origin and thinks their views were promoted in Spain through influences from Italy. One of their earliest leaders—indeed, some scholars style her as a “pre-Alumbrado”—was María de Santo Domingo, who came to be known as La Beata de Piedrahita. She was a labourer’s daughter, born in Aldeanueva, south of Salamanca, around 1485. She joined the Dominican order as a teenager and soon achieved renown as a prophet and mystic who could converse directly with Jesus Christ and the Virgin. Ferdinand of Aragon invited her to his court, and he became convinced of the sincerity of her visions. The Dominicans appealed to Pope Julius II for guidance, and a series of trials were convened under the auspices of the Inquisition. Her patrons, which by then included not only Ferdinand but also Francisco Cardenal Jiménez de Cisneros and the duke of Alba, ensured that no decision was taken against her, and she was cleared in 1510.
I've listened to part of this David and it's very comprehensive and enlightening, especially for 1967 (although I think we've gone backwards so that's not surprising.) I write about much of this in my book. Fagan doesn't mention that Taft got elected because they ran Teddy Roosevelt as a third party candidate to steal votes away. A tried and true technique.
But it's also teaching me new things and reinforcing things I've heard. I'll start from the beginning after it reaches the end from the midpoint your link launched. Thanks for recommending.
Thanks for that, David. It is always helpful to have a format I can watch while doing other things, and one I can copy and quote from. The Britannica definition seems as innocuous as the one that YT superimposes and my videos from Wikipedia. No mention of secret societies doing harm in the world!
To all of your readers the book below is the modern day version of what you have been talking about ; this is a British Think Tank , probably the most infamous which was funded by The Queen of England and then by the notorious Banksters in your country. The very least, please read the paragraph below.
Coleman : The Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations.
Page 20
By the year 2000 there was hardly any aspect of life in America into which Tavistock's tentacles had not reached and that included every level of government from local to federal, industry, trade, education and the political institutions of the nation. Every mental and psychological aspect of the nation was analyzed, recorded, profiled and stored in computer memory banks.
I know it is a big ask for you to read the books I put your way , they take up a lot of time, which I suspect you do not have much of to spare . The opening chapter, of the Tavistock Institute, re the Russian Revolution will make you gasp, if you have not read other books on the subject in the past; and you thought you knew history .
I appreciate you telling me why it's important, David, and your appreciating my lack of time. On line books, in particular, are hard because screens aren't a medium I love unless it gives me a chance to be interactive. And there's the constant interruptions and limit to plugged in spaces. But I'll commit to reading the first chapter because I'm certain it will be revelatory.
Thank you most of all for posting this Tereza. Again G_D loves courage.
I never actually considered the extent to which Jewish religious tradition was and is applied for narrative of entitlement (or maybe I never had it discussed as clearly - at least it was excellent communication for my understanding, but I have some background context). Without context, or with willful ignorance for material reasons (including the desire to 1. harm life and 2. be dishonest(!))
Actually such a gem of piece. It must be difficult - I know - because vile people of so many feathers often also quote the same sources you do, but with different intention.
One outcome I don't think you discussed or are not aware of: nominally Jewish merchants were incredibly and disproportionately active in the central asian slave trade extending from 500 CE-1500 CE. Also of note in this: this is obscured and even countered in narratives by many scholars, typically also nominally Jewish - though Turkish National and other National scholars take such issue with it. It is fantastic but true, that world histiography (sp?) and history of the world especially in contemporary western university is dominated - sometimes exclusively - for study, funding, and narrative by nominally Jewish (which is okay) Zionist (which is my goodness the definition of not okay) sources.
Also, Tereza, why do the spooks allow some of us, to sometimes, nominally communicate?
Because what I write about in my substack - the slow murder protocols to harm learning (and the technical observations I have aren't speculations they are firsthand knowledge) - applies now to a) "Muslims" or any culture b) Arabics of any religion c) honest journalists d) leftist academics e) geniune progressives f) free thinkers g) anti-zionists. But I fear they will fold it back to just "Muslims" again, and no one will care.
Do they allow us to communicate out of fear, or boredom, or indifference?
Thank you for the appreciation, shaqer, and the additional information. Do you have any references on that? It's very interesting. I didn't even know there was a central Asian slave trade from 500-1500 CE, that's how little I know.
In it, he talks about the Khazarians being those who adopted Judaism or Talmudism and twisted it to their own purposes. I don't think we should leave unexamined ideologies lying around, like knives that are harmless unless they're pointed at you. So I'm not sure what a nominal Jew is. If it's not a race then it's an ideology. And what question does it answer? Who has the right to rule over who. Who it's okay or even required to hate. That's why I call the Torah-based belief system Shemitism because it traces the ruling dynasty back to Shem.
Those who Josephus considered the descendants of Ham and destined to be slaves were the Africans, Egyptians and parts of Asia. That was in 80 CE. I think the story of Exodus has been flipped and the Abramites were the rulers or the Pharaoh's henchmen and enforcers of the Egyptians as slaves. So maybe that makes sense that central Asia was the next victim and Africans after that.
For your last question, I'm choosing to live as if Spirit is ultimately in charge and not the spooks. If I assume we're communicating with their permission, I've given them power over me without them needing to do anything. To be able to censor, you have to either have people who are smart enough to know the truth and nefarious enough to suppress it, or you expose people inadvertently by drawing their attention to it. But I believe there's purpose in everything that happens, and that purpose is leading towards our happiness, not our demise.
Dec 3, 2023·edited Dec 3, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
I'm referencing from what I remember reading as an undergrad a long time ago - and I'm entirely a product of the Western Academy through tertiary+. So I will have to look up.
But - Bat Yeor, a controversial scholar who is marketed as an expert, and the notorious Bernard Lewis are two examples of experts who develop stable narratives of Arabic-speaking and/or Islam-prevalent locations of the world. Both Zionists, Bernard Lewis is forwarded especially as "expert of Islam" in military academies.
And I do know, Turkish authors cite the omission of nominally Jewish slave traders involved as middlemen for slave trading of Turkic and Slavic speaking people (presumably others as well). A Persian author also points out the cooperation of nominally Jewish religious authorities i.e. "rabbis" in cooperating with Mongol forces to loot their neighbors. This much I can say for a fact, that I have read as cited. But will have to look up. The rest is speculation, backed by a vibe, I will say so. Vibes shouldn't be underestimated in my experience. More things in heaven and earth I am 100% sure of that, just like I am sure that I'm not in charge and fortunately another is.
It shouldn't be just up to you to have to research everything. And these questions are not even asked. Thanks Tereza.
That's very interesting, shaqer. It would certainly fit with a religion that has one set of rules for its own and no code of morality towards the other. Your data on Iraqi Jews being pushed to emigrate to Palestine with false-flag Zionist attacks also matches what I've read elsewhere. It was a strategy because generally Jews didn't want to go to the desert outpost that was then Palestine.
Did you send me a link for Charles Upton? I appreciate your camaraderie on this journey, shaqer. I'm just scratching the surface in my research and it's all so different from what we've been told.
His book which I like a lot is "System of the Antichrist" - which is a critique of modern society.
He also co-wrote something with his wife called "Mysteries of the Rose" ... but I don't think I can appreciate that one at this point in life, you might be able to.
"Who is the Earth?" is the Charles Upton book I am reading right now
If you are interested in "Islamic" themes, I would suggest looking up Marshall GS Hodgson. Especially his three volume work, especially the first and second volumes. Very dense. Hodgson was/is a Christian of Quaker persuasion (not of the Richard Nixon persuasion, hehe). I like his work a lot and learned a very very great deal about myself and the world from him.
I've only watched the first five minutes and I already love Charles Upton. He goes right to the heart of the matter in this! It's not whether machines write a well-crafted poem full of evocative ambiguity, it's that poetry is the act of finding meaning. Only someone who doesn't actually read poetry, much less write poetry, would mistake the package for the contents.
Thanks for recommending him, Shaqer. I'm glad I kept this page open until I could get back to it!
I am so happy that you liked it! I think he's amazing, though maybe a bit pessimistic. But doubtless there are things which I am missing in what he says. I would love to meet him and his partner in person one day.
And I have to say this, as a reminder from a well-wisher and fellow who often worries too much: Tereza, please do be mindful of the malfeasant creatures, they are depraved and insidious and celebrate deceit. Trust your instincts. And I know you know all of this at least as well as me.
EDIT: I mention the point of the Persian chroniclers for this reason: presumably, the narrative memory of the nominally Jewish communities would recall the community in which they lived, whether dominated by Zoroastrians, Buddhists, or Muslims [sic]. It's relevant to the question of entitlement. And yet - but human beings are people who do have a sense of self-preservation, but something incredible seems here as well.
To compare: the organized migration of Iraqi Jews [sic] to Palestine in the late 1940s, with breakdown of law enforcement, agitation, misinformation, direction, and mechanical arming and fostering of miscreant elements by direct and indirect means. See also the planting of bombs in Iraqi synagogues by Zionists as part of this effort [this is easy to look up]. It is a terrible thing, most of all to exploit poor people. But the migrant Iraqi Jews had it much better from the process (at least in material terms), also their children. These communities would also have a narrative memory with Muslim and Christian neighbors. I'll just leave this as a specific case, but yes, a interpreted tradition of entitlement is corrosive, and dangerous, and contagious, and worse if that tradition is more severe.
Dec 3, 2023·edited Dec 3, 2023Liked by Tereza Coraggio
I will look up. But even the academy is organized in certain ways to privilege certain types of inquiry, and certain inquiries, as you well know. :| BTW you will love Charles Upton's writing when you get to it :)
Very interesting article, totally wrong in its conclusions but as always, some of the best arguments are made by those who don't understand what they're saying. Is this comment the one that talks about things inserted retroactively?
"Is this comment the one that talks about things inserted retroactively?"
Which comment are you referring to, TC? Speaking of comments, I found many of them interesting.
My take on all this, which is not based on any study of the subject, (or much interest on my part), is that whatever the truth is I'll never really know for certain, but I can probably assume that the story has been twisted and retwisted to suit the preferences of our wanna be rulers at the times they changed it., so no wonder there's so much confusion and contradiction. Kinda like the endlessly changing or continuously evolving of FDR's "New Deals" and Stalin's "5-Year Plans."
I just posted it to see what others here thought since I value the input from you and your commenters. I'm basically a tabula rasa on the subject as well as many, many others.
This is excellent work Tereza, there are quite a few details to examine regarding the history of Judea. The Talmud is likely a work that came from the Khazarian culture, the Pre-Jewish Khazarians were a blood thirsty type; they were ritual cannibals, they practiced institutionalized pedophilia and many forms of criminal behavior.
Most of the people in positions of control in Israel are people who can trace their lineages back to Khazaria, which is now known as Ukraine. Actually, a majority of the people in charge in the US are also of the same ilk. There are a lot of Jews who are really against Israel and are currently protesting the effort to create this new war footing. Turns out that the truly Semitic people of Palestine are the Palestinians themselves by a factor of 80%.
I guess that kinda makes Israel an Anti Semitic farce of a country.
Thanks for that additional insight, Nefahotep. I was just watching Max Blumenthal interview Ilan Pappe on his book, The Ten Myths of Israel: https://youtu.be/qxQNk81ELbI. He talks about settler colonialism and how Israel has reversed who is indigenous and who is the invader. They do this using the Torah as history. So it seemed like it might be useful to take the Torah at 'face' value and use its own words to show the immorality even within its own justification.
What was the era when the Khazarians developed their 'culture'?
Khazaria grew out of the collapse of the Gokturk Empire. Khazarian people are of Scythian origin. Around the 8th century, the king of Khazaria force converted all of his people into Judaism, apparently in order to appease his neighbors. But he did not change the culture of his people, as they continued to do blood sacrifice, and child rape. Finally, completely fed up, approx around 1100 AD, Russia and Persia joined forces and destroyed Khazaria. But the Elites of Khazaria had spies and caught wind of the Czar's plan. It is said that they escaped to Western Europe and are the origin of Rothschild and other families.
I think that the 13 bloodlines may have come from Khazaria but they made that diaspora over a long time, many of them are original Roman Senator families.
Interesting, that timeline intersects with the finalizing of the Mishnah Torah towards the end of the 1100's. Thanks for that explanation.
🎯
Frances Leader writes excellent work on the Roman Senator families:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
This is also interesting:
"Occult Bloodlines of Canaan - ROBERT SEPEHR"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGvHKg0vKVs&list=WL&index=1
Thank you for posting this. Excellent stuff.
Clif High has written quite a bit about what he calls the Khazarian Mafia and their history, eg:
https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/space-aliens
Long ago I think, 1000 years or so or more.
🙌🏻
An outstanding essay, and exceptionally well written, too. It deserves to be read 2 or 3 times. Yes, the history and current events here are built on lies seemingly every which way. Thanks, Tereza.
Thank you, Dave. I did pack a lot of information into this one. I think you would also like the documentary The 13 Sugar Colonies. I think they kept the YT description vague so it wouldn't be taken down but it presents black scholars showing that Jews were at the forefront of the transatlantic slave trade. It was a history that was new to me. As you say, so many lies.
"...that Jews were at the forefront of the transatlantic slave trade."
Banking too. You'd be shocked (or maybe not...it was the usual suspects) at the source of money behind the American "Revolution." I am no expert on the subject and don't have all the details, but what I've found no longer surprises me.
Jefferson referred to them as "Amsterdam bankers." Then there was a guy named Haym Soloman who did a lot of financing and to whom several of the "founders" were apparently indebted.
"I cannot in any way make you more sensible of the importance of your kind attention to pecuniary remittances for me than by informing you that I have for some time past been a pensioner on the favor of H. S. Haym Solomon a Jew Broker."
From James Madison to Edmund Randolph, 27 August 1782
To Edmund Randolph
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-05-02-0037
VERY interesting, Geoff. I often forget about the Dutch in the Dutch East India Company, strange though that seems. The documentary goes into the Dutch Jew connections (why do we say 'Jewish' when we don't say Christianish or Hinduish?)
The financing of the AM Rev is fascinating as are the motives of the prominent advocates of the constitution.
I've been "multi-tasking" while listening to the vid and am about half way through. I find it as admirable as well as true that several times the narrator mentioned that it was not all Jews but the rich ones that were slave profiteers and that they hid behind various names, such as Spaniards and Anglo-Saxons.
And it's my (largely unproven but not entirely off the wall) suspicion that the USA as we know it today was begun and still functions as a project of those who profitted in the slave trade and other money grubbing trades such as the addiction ones (sugar, opium and the like) including those we know as the pharmaceutical and the "food" processig industries we're poisoned by today.
The history of opium is very interesting as well and it also ties in with the cotton and textile industry and trade. Same tribe involved with those. Similar methods of wringing profits out of the masses of humanity too.
The video confirms and supplements many of my suspicions. Your article is a real gem.
I like and share your suspicions. Of course, IF you ever get my book, you'll see the first section is Pieces of Slave and I argue that it's what the monetary system was designed to do since the invention of coinage, and what it does to this day. That's why you can't fix anything without replacing it with an actual system of exchange and community reciprocity.
I fully intend to get your book, but I have to find an acceptable source. and as you know, it does not begin with the letter, "A," which emits the distinct odor of an over capitalized monstrosity and, I suspect, is anti-"actual system of exchange and community reciprocity" in intent, concept, delivery and execution (puns intended).
'Ish' is 'man' in Hebrew.
An interesting corollary to that was the adoption of slavery in about the 10th(?) century by the Moslems when they became addicted to sugar and didn't like how hard it is to make.
I think that there is a sugar-history that would be good to look at because the sugar 'traders' are likely amongst the most powerful with the chains of dynastic power. Sugar was invented in India around 500BC.
A great introduction to that is 'The Case Against Sugar' by Gary Taubes.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29874881-the-case-against-sugar
Thanks for sharing that, Guy! I talk some about sugar in my book from a text called Sweetness and Power, and a couple of other sources. It's definitely key. I'll look at Gary Taubes, whose name is familiar. I wonder if I've read him before.
You may have met Taubes he has an interesting history of research around health. His sugar book is about health and the links between the expansion of the sugar empire and ill health. Really well done. And, of course, that sugar may likely have been the first of the agents to capture health regulatory agencies and universities.
And your discussion included a lovely little synchronicity with an encounter with Ismael on the bus yesterday.
Oh, my! Thanks for that!
Another tour de force, Tereza. Thank you.
Given the ubiquitous lies and deceptions which infest the subject, do we know who really wrote the Talmud? Was it Jews, or Name Stealers or others hiding behind a Jewish identity? Khazarians?
With regard to the Jewish-Roman wars, an interesting angle is that Rome was founded by descendants of the non-Judaic so-called "Lost" Ten Tribes of Israel. After leaving captivity in Assyria, they migrated north and west through Asia Minor. After The Trojan War (which took place around 650 BC, not six hundred years earlier), two groups of refugees left Anatolia. One group sailed to Etruria and went on to found Rome. The other, led by Brutus of Troy, went to Britain and founded New Troy, which we now know as London. Doesn't this shed an interesting light on the relationship between Zion, The Vatican and The City of London?
Very much so, Tirion. I'm not sure we can even talk about 'the Jews' as followers of a religion from Judea without clarifying which religion from Judea. There are the Shemites, which I'd use to describe those who believe in the Torah's entitlement to the sons of Shem. There are the Sadducees who rejected the Torah and were 'prey' to the robbers/ rebels who rejected Roman rule. There was the Jesus cult who believed they inherited the right to 'go out and subdue the nations.' And there were the gnostics, the Fourth Philosophy and the zealots. Will the real Judaism please stand up?
The Talmud is definitely Rabbinical Judaism, elevating the writings of these rabbis to scripture. But like the gospels, I'm going back to the foundational stories of the Torah and they still stink. So I don't think that branch of religion needs to have been corrupted. Although I'd love to get my eyeballs on the Dead Sea Scrolls that Israel is hoarding and see if there's a reason the scholars who studied them committed suicide.
Maybe they were "J3wicided", like associates of a certain presidential candidate were "Arkancided."
Another gem of brilliance.
"With regard to the Jewish-Roman wars, an interesting angle is that Rome was founded by descendants of the non-Judaic so-called "Lost" Ten Tribes of Israel. "
Interesting claim there. I'm currently reading Macchiavelli's "Florentine Histories" and that very question has popped into my mind about both Rome and the subsequent political entities. it's quite unbelieveable what went on in Florence and Italy in general 5 or 6 centuries ago. It apparently hadn't changed much from what went on in the vicinity for millenia previously.
You might enjoy "The Trojan War of 650 BC," by Wilson and Blackett (Cymroglyphics):
https://www.cymroglyphics.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=65&search=trojan
Whoa!
I followed your link and found that you are correct; I am interested.
"The English people were persuaded to forget their British roots and instead become Germanic “Anglo-Saxons”. The Welsh, Scottish and Irish were also to lose their glorious pasts and be told that they came from primitive “Celtic” tribes.
This campaign of mis-information was so successful that few people today are even aware that these changes ever happened."
Why am I not surprised??
I'm pretty sure that Herodotus and Thucydides claimed, and took pains, to ensure that their histories were perceived as valid too. I wonder why that would be...wink, wink!
I'm going to purchase the book as soon as I post this and pseaking of Thucydides, I don't think TC could be accused of being among the vulgar.
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand."
Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War, Book I, 1.21-[3], 431 BC
Yes, it's complete nonsense/propaganda to describe even the English as "Anglo-Saxon," let alone the Welsh, Scots and Irish - who, in turn are not Celtic either! Only a small minority of the English, mainly in Kent and East Anglia, have Anglo-Saxon heritage. It's a myth intended to bolster the weak legitimacy of The House of Hanover/Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Windsor.
I had a brother in law who hailed from Essex. It would have been interesting to discuss that with him. Very interesting and fun old chap, he was.
It's available from Abe Books for $962.55! Maybe I'll try toaccess it through a library!
And Amazon Used plus postage!!!
...Buy used: $495.00
$3.91 delivery November 10 - 13. Details
A much improved second edition was published by Cymroglyphics in 2020. GBP29.99 plus postage for 500 fascinating pages :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTLbhlTihtY
Thank you.
"I am the Lord thy God and I honor cheats and liars. This is the redundant theme of the Torah."
What an excellent way to cut to the heart of it. I don't think I've ever read any article so "information dense." and your piece deserves to be read and studied multiple times. And thank you for taking us down several more rabbit holes! : )
Mossad's official motto: "By deception shalt thou make war"!
Why, I'm shocked. Shocked I tell ya! : )
Tereza, you write many things that don’t understand and have no knowledge of and which I therefore can’t at present comment on. BUT I can’t help but comment on your seemingly throwaway remarks about Christ. I do not agree with you on this - yes of course Christianity (Churchianity) has had a bloody ignominious 2000 year history, but behind that imperfect religion lies the impulse of the Christ. Perhaps most simply described as pure selfless love. If you read Steiner - which I know you do, you will see that this Christ impulse is central to his whole philosophy. Without going into detail ( please ask if you want more detail) Steiner says that the tragedy of the Jewish people is that their task was to bring the Christ impulse to birth and then gently let go of their sense of self as a race. Their task was complete when the Christ incarnated. The Christ impulse of pure selfless love, totally areligious and non denominational, was and is supposed to permeate the whole of the Earth. The tragedy of today in Palestine is that Zionism still holds on to their mission, waiting for the Messiah, the Christ, not recognising the reality of 2000 years ago. They are still waiting for him to incarnate and in their minds it will be in Jerusalem.
And just to add to the confusion- the American Evangelists are waiting for the second coming of Christ - also to incarnate in Jerusalem. So a potent brew of false hope - money and power mixed together waiting for something that will not happen. ( Steiner was very clear - Christ will not incarnate again in a human body).
I’m sorry this is complicated and probably not accurately represented but felt I needed to put at least something out there, however imperfect .Accessing Steiner’s thoughts on this subject is quite easy - just search online, nothing is hidden. And then you can make an informed decision for yourself.
With best wishes for all you do!
Thank you, Michael, for putting your thoughts out there and not rejecting the other things I say, when this is an important topic for you. The place I would start is with the question, is the Christ a what or a who? In first century Judea, this was an open question. To the gnostics and Sadducees, along with A Course in Miracles today, the Christ-mind is a way of perceiving that sees the equal value and good in everyone. It's equally accessible to all.
There are two parts to the story of Jesus in the gospels: the ideology of pure selfless love that you (and Steiner) describe beautifully as the Christ-impulse and the historical details, including the name. In which one do you place your faith? If your faith is in selfless love, I can tell you that everything you love about Jesus and more is true, but his name was Judas. If your faith is in the historical details, I have to say that the person who invented the story of Jesus was one of the most selfish, egotistical and malevolently cruel people to have lived. Without the psyops of replacing our pure love and faith in each other with the story of one man who was better than all the rest of us put together, the 2000 year bloody ignominious history could never have happened.
I admire Steiner but don't accept the authority of anyone else to tell me what or how to think.
The other aspect of your question is the theological. It assumes a God who could intervene in the world but chooses not to, allowing if not causing suffering, loss and death. God's intervention was to send the one more beloved to him than all of us together (even though we're supposedly also God's children) to suffer and die in the most painful way possible (like tens of thousands of others at the same time, whose deaths didn't matter to God) so that he would forgive humanity for ... something.
From the perspective of the Course, God can't intervene because this world is our dream, not real. The Christ-mind recognizes the Christ in everyone else. The Jesus-mind says, "Believe in me, not yourself or other people." These are mutually exclusive, imo. I talk about this in some early episodes pre-Substack on this playlist, but I'll write more about it soon: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS5WYJBpd75viFQXENZZXVjxzxpXHipmQ.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment and giving me space to respond.
Hi Tereza, quite a lot to tease apart on a Sunday evening, but here goes...
Steiner: I don't believe everything he says, BUT I have great respect and trust in much of what he says - particularly Waldorf schools, Biodynamic agriculture, holistic medicine, the causes of the First World War, reincarnation and karma, nature spirits, and angels to name but a few. Because these subjects have found deep resonance within me and help me understand the world like no other person can, I have learnt to respect Steiner's utterances. this is why I suggest looking into his understanding of Christ.
the Christ Story: (from Steiner). the Jewish race were the carriers of the Jesus body into whom Christ incarnated at AD 30 (Jordan baptism). Christ lived for 3 years on earth then was crucified. This had to happen to enable the Christ to fully connect to the Earth and to help it and us transform into a higher spiritual reality (as the Earth was becoming too materialised). The necessary shadow forces to bring this about were embodied in Judas.
Since the crucifixion and resurrection Christ lives in the etheric realm of the Earth and can be accessed by all of us as pure selfless love, (irrespective of religion, class, power, geography, race etc).
You are correct that there is no historical proof of Christ ( freely admitted by Steiner! see Lecture "How do I find the Christ?") he uses the argument (which can of course be shot down by rationalists) that because this was a spiritual event it has to be understood spiritually and needs no physical proof! "How convenient!"I hear you say and to that I have no answer but this:
Yes its crazy, ridiculous, historically incorrect, logically flawed (God sending a son to die etc), but for me and for many others (maybe check out Gigi Young) it RESONATES with my sense for truth, or at least with my sense for 'something-not-being-totally-wrong-and-needing-more-investigation'. it helps makes sense of the world today for me, especially, as I said already, the tragedy of the Jewish people.
Personally, I think the inability to entertain the idea of a pure selfless Christ impulse will cause much trouble for the future, as humanity will only be able to look at the world through a materialistic logical lens. This logical lens will continue the medical tyranny, political strife and tribal wars over 'territory', etc. and will not be helpful for us to feel hope, love and confidence for the future. This hope, love and confidence is for vital if we are transform ourselves and all the beings of the Earth out of this deep place of materialism which we find ourselves in today. Perhaps for this reason alone it might be worth a little further investigation?
We're in full agreement about Steiner, and I remember you were the one who told me about The Karma of Untruthfulness. I'm halfway through Vol 1 and should get back to it. I appreciate you alerting me to him.
And we're in full agreement about the idea of a pure selfless Christ impulse. If Steiner had everything right, however, you and I would be redundant. There would be no need for us to be born. Steiner made that statement as a mystic about the Jesus body reincarnating in 30 AD and living 3 years. He contradicts the gospels, of course, and so rejects the historical Jesus. Yet he keeps the name, Judas as shadow, and the agony of the crucifixion.
I grew up in a house with crosses and pictures of a bleeding Jesus in practically every room and it never resonated with me. I have no desire for my daughters to suffer to prove their love for me. It doesn't make sense that God would.
If we keep the non-materialism and hope, love and confidence for the future, but leave out a God that requires sacrifice, we would agree. The Course is a channeled text from the Christ. And entertaining the possibility that we're One and the world is our dream--it doesn't get more non-materialistic than that. I think that we agree on all of the important points.
Tereza, many good points, all well made, as always.
Thank you !
And yes, I think I was a little ‘trigger- happy’ with my use of the word ‘materialism’. As you rightly say the Course in Miracles is definitely not in this camp. So apologies… I must be channeling my ‘inner missionary ’from a previous incarnation 😂.
Ooh your experience of Christianity in childhood sounds painful and unhelpful… and what a strange message you were given that Christ had to prove his love to God. But I can totally see where that arises in the narrative and I will meditate upon that further.
I agree that we should keep transforming the Earth with those bits of the narrative that we do agree on, which are many.
NB have you come across Steiner’s ideas on social threefolding? -Sisterhood/Brotherhood in the economic realm, Freedom in the cultural/spiritual realm ( including education and medicine) and Equality in the rights realm. An impossible ideal or the only hope for humanity to get out of the political left/right political power dynamic (which means nothing any more)?
With best wishes for all you do!
Thanks for that kind response, Michael. My parents were sincere Catholics, my mom refusing to marry a very wealthy man until he had his previous marriage annulled but after years of trying, he suddenly married someone else. For my dad, I'm sure his religion enabled him to break the cycle of abuse, since he came from a family of wife-beaters. They were never hypocritical about their faith, but it was the most important factor in their lives.
I went to Catholic grade school, HS and college, which I entered as a religion major but changed later. In my 40's I decided to have an adult relationship with the religion of my childhood and started studying world religions and scripture analysis in earnest. Since I don't do anything halfway, this included the int'l conference of Bible scholars and their work.
I don't believe the conclusions I've come to from my study are reactive or emotional (not that you're implying that.) I've been puzzling through contradictions in Christianity my whole life, but it was a surprise to me--one I was reluctant to acknowledge--when I realized the whole story of Jesus was a fiction and, furthermore, one written by and for the empire.
I wouldn't say this without a mountain of evidence. I certainly wouldn't even want you to agree. Just to suspend certainty for a moment, and consider that it's possible. If it's a necessary step for you in the healing of the world, as it turned out to be for me, it will present itself in other ways in your life. But I didn't need to heal myself from any religion-induced trauma. I'm grateful to my parents for having left me with little baggage so I can focus outward.
And no, I haven't heard of social threefolding, but it sounds fascinating! I'll look for that. Is there an online source?
"The Christ impulse of pure selfless love, totally areligious and non denominational..."
While I don't consider myself a Christian, I have held the view you stated for a long time; it's pretty obvious that he did not come to found a religion. The so called religion is obviously a manipulative construct created by those who had the will and ability to pervert whatever his philosophy was.
Anyway, I do like the part where he took a switch to the money changers and I think there may be a lesson there somewhere!
Who is 'he'? Please give biographical details that would identify this particular person--name, parents, date of birth, place of birth, life events, quotes, circumstances and date of death.
And I will tell you why those details can't possibly be true because they conflict with other historical events, historical figures or even geography and archeology. Of the statements attributed to Jesus, 87% have been voted invalid by the international convention of Bible scholars called The Jesus Seminars. They present evidence, then vote. These are often things that had already been said by other people or parables with tropes, idioms and plays on words that don't work in any language but Greek.
It isn't really a throwaway line for me to say Jesus is a literary character, not a historical person, but it will take at least one volume to present the evidence. But to your specific example of taking a switch to the money changers, at the time that story was first written (post-70 CE) the robbers/ rebels had made the Temple of Jerusalem their headquarters. The gospels mention the high priests by name killed 'between the altar and ?' that happened 40 yrs after Jesus' supposed death. They had turned the temple into a 'den of thieves.'
Did Judea, after they'd thrown off the yoke of Roman subservience, continue to use Roman coins for internal exchange? Would you do that? They'd have to be fools to keep their commerce dependent on imperial money, which the Hellenic traitors had roomfuls of stashed in the Temple, while the peasants had none. So in this story that couldn't have happened without a time machine to kill the high priests and go back 40 yrs, Jesus is metaphorically scourging the creators of a community currency. Maybe one just like mine ;-)
The "he" I'm talking about is the guy we've all heard about of course.
And of course "he" is mythical, which is only one reason why I am areligious. However, even the Christ of the common myth was never presented as far as I know of, as someone who came to found or institute a religion. Now even though this particular guy was a undoubteldy a myth, there have nevertheless been many other "anointed" ones who met similar ends and they never wrote anything down nor did they care about founding a religion, so there's that. E.g., Socrates probably existed and his story parallels in many ways that of the subject at hand, I think.
Anyway, still like the part where he (supposedly)drove the money changers out of the temple and I also still think there's a lesson in there somewhere. Oh, and if the myth said a woman came to deliver us from evil, I'd still think there would be a message (and a good one at that), if she took a broom and smacked the Pharisees with it and swept them out of the temple too.
😎
So if you're admitting here that 'Jesus' is a literary invention, who wrote the story and why? As I keep saying, there are only two sides: empire vs. sovereignty. Since scholars have established it was written or orally transmitted in Greek, including the quotes attributed to 'Jesus,' it's a story written by the Roman Empire to invent a false peasant hero. It couldn't crush the rebellion with fear or violence, so it had to psychologically manipulate them.
Remember what I've said about controlled opposition being a sheepdog leading back to the slaughterhouse through a different path. It's not an accident that the 'Jesus' story led to 2000 years of imperialism with the 'holy Roman empire' at the pyramid's peak. Like money, it's worked exactly as it was designed.
The Pharisees were the priests of the people, not the elite. Zadok / Sadduc was a Pharisee, and the high priest of the revolution was a Sadducee. It's not about women vs. men, it's that 'Jesus' represents the side of empire and you're being tricked into siding with it too and celebrating violence against peasants fighting (successfully!) for sovereignty.
"Jesus' represents the side of empire and you're being tricked into siding with it."
I was partly being a smart (bleep) and messing with you with that crack about women, but you may have a point there about the Pharisees , and it wouldn't be the first time I "spoke" without thinking, but I was using in the snese of "Hypocritically self-righteous and condemnatory," and I was also operating under the illusion that they were tax collectors and oppressors of the peasants.
It wouldn't be the first time that things are the opposite of what they've been made out to be, would it? Thanks for pointing that out.
Once again, we're are completely reading the same paragraph in the same chapter, in the same book and in very similar if not the exact same ways. Most of history and "da newz" are literary inventions as well.
My original comment was directed at demonstrating a separation between the story and at least a couple of religions with innumerable offshoots no less..
Who wrote the story? There are many stories and many people wrote them and everyone has her different interpretation of them as you are well aware. It's a big and contradictory mishmash to boot.
Anyway, what next? Are you going to spill the beans that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are myths as well?
🤓
Hola, Tereza. Wow! Double wow!!
Very powerful, especially combined with the startling and eye-opening The 13 Sugar Colonies video. I am so grateful you included that! It really is important. I was totally oblivious to everything it disclosed.
I'm busy writing my next essay, in the form of a sort of letter to my dead father. Your essay and your sharing the 13 Sugar Colonies video have unexpectedly worked their way into that epistle! A lovely synchronicity as my epistle is taking unexpected turns around Los Días de Los Muertos.
And here I will double flag the high importance of The 13 Sugar Colonies! This IS an important documentary that totally destroys the myth around who was and wasn't responsible for the slave trade. We are living in the time of the great unveiling, and so let us open the doors to rooms that once were hidden from us and with eyes to see let us look behind this particular slave door to discover the deliberately hidden history of significant, central role the wealthy Jews had in the slave trade from start to finish. This is such an important video to watch. And many of the Caribbean pirates were Jewish. So fascinating.
If we are to wake up, I mean really wake up to the history that has brought us into convidiana and our coming to be alive during an active holocaust likely far bigger than the one even of the blacks and indigenous Americans, it serves us ill to remain blinded by the popular delusion fed to us like pabulum as if it is history. That includes the astounding denials of 9/11, JFK, America's financing and equipping of Hitler, the 'true' effectiveness and purpose of vaccination, who mostly benefitted from slavery and why, the shady truth of key elements of the Bible that don't bear up under close scrutiny, the real 1st world war, and on and on.
Did you ever read Orwell's 'Homage to Catalonia'? Also an important book, about his experience of being a volunteer fighter for democracy in Spain and his acute powers of observation noting the difference between what was reported and 'reality.' Fantastically written, and also important in this age of OMG! So much important stuff to read. Well, time to finish late supper dishes and get back to the epistle.
Thank you! I'll be linking to this substack in my own.
Have I said lately how proud I am to claim you and Geoff as friends, Guy? You are both such remarkable, knowledgable people. I'm honored that you'll include this video in your essay and I look forward to hearing how it ties in with your father. I'm grateful to Julius Skoolafish for posting it and I think you'd like his Book Reviews, both of you.
My latest video has Días de Los Muertos marigolds in it that were given to me by my daughter's Oaxacan boyfriend. Synchronicity!
And I haven't read Homage but one of the most powerful and heartbreaking books I've ever read was Spain in Our Hearts by Adam Hochschild: https://youtu.be/-Vuf9UBITFM?si=BO4FWjEKHEvw08wP. Absolutely critical history! And love the Shooting an Elephant quote, Geoff.
Gracias, Tereza.
Egualmente! You are providing great resources and challenges to those pesky truth-traps somewhere in this thing called Guy's fields of unconscious beliefs. This takes me all the way back to Seth's 'The Nature of Personal Reality' where he discussed the importance of what he called 'core beliefs'; the truths which are hidden in the same way we imagine fish unable to describe water because it is effectively invisible to them except at the liminal edges. And the 'great' thing about hidden beliefs is that even when we hold totally contradictory beliefs, we are oblivious to them except in how the are made manifest in our physical and somatic experiences.
Ah yes, also called paradigms 'what you think before you think that you're thinking' ;-)
Great comments there! Agree with all.
Speaking of Orwell, another fine piece of work is the short story, "Shooting an Elephant".
" Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd – seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. And my whole life, every white man's life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at. ”
-George Orwell, Shooting an Elephant, 1936
http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/887/
Yes, this is one of those standout pieces of writing in my life as well. Thank you for bringing this forward back from my distant past. I will revisit it.
Muchas gracias!
De nada, mi amigo! Estoy encantada de conocerto!
Equalmente! Mucho gusto.
I can read that but <i> I have to </i> learn more Spanish (and French...my pronunciation is tres horrrible!) ! (Did you see what I did there? I bet you can tell what I've just been reading. Wink, wink!)
LOL! "Have to" and the spell of the bully! I suspect that you are reading not Montaigne in the original 16th century French, perhaps something about the word spells keeping us disempowered! I look forward to any thoughts you might add to that!
Muchas gracias, as I jump into my morning Spanish.
If you are interested in Spanish I highly recommend Marcus Santamaria's Shortcut To Spanish online. Let me know and I'll seen a link and you can check it out. (Me and my friend are loving it,. My goal is to be fluent before the end of December. And it might happen!)
Brilliant Tereza. Decoding par excellence. I read Eustace Mullins Curse of Canaan a while ago. Your posting is the relish that embellishes the taste.
Oh I hadn't heard of Curse of Canaan. Yet another reason to admire Mullins! Thank you for that kind comment. This did feel like an important piece that I'd been mulling over for several days.
Easy to find as a free PDF. Worth reading.
Hola, Tereza.
Have you been tracking Free on Bitchute? Often she is interesting with very interesting guests.
This is 'nice' — sorry, that is really a very funny joke, sort of — video with guests Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben. She has had them on before to track the history of the Babylonian money cartels who line up perfectly with Clif High's description of the history of the khazarian mafia, as he calls them. You will certainly want to track back to them, if you haven't already done so.
This time they are talking about Israel, Gaza, the UK monarchy as owners of Israel, the Pilgrim Society.
"11/1/23 BUILD BACK BABYLON BETTER, BABY! WW3 & 7TH BEAST KINGDOM"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0KsQOobU3pzw/
The video description is:
While Netanyahu proclaims a Biblical right to raze Gaza, The Cartel Babylon Banksters run the global perception deception from the City of London in the attempt to kick off WW3 and consolidate planetary control of humanity. The Cartel Babylon series is back!
Analysis and discussion with Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel! We, the People, are Awake to their satanic plan and are uniting in prayer and Godly Intention to turn away from and defeat the satanic globalists!
Thanks Guy, I'll check it out!
Whether it is the torah, the bible, or the quran the same kind of attitude prevails towards the 'other': get rid of him/her. This largely explains that. Our 'civilization' is based on those scriptures and that doesn't help the cause unless these types of morality carry on serving an agenda which end is a perpetual denial of a modus vivendi/modus operandi based on equality for all. I know I simplify but at this point I can't help being delusioned about this species that is supposedly the smartest.
And you could certainly include the Hindu scriptures of superiority. Yes, your point is well made that these scriptures form the basis of our 'civilization' and embed a morality of rulers-servants-slaves with unequal rights or even humanity. Those who reject the religions, like Darwin, still assume the inherent superiority that's the uneven terrain underneath.
I disagree, however, with your and Geoff's conclusions. Once you understand that this 3500 yr old psyops underlies every element of our culture, who would we be without it? I don't think we can pretend to know. Our every waking/ sleeping moment is dominated by this narrative--one that says God is great and people are stupid, evil and inferior to us.
I would also reverse what you're saying Geoff. To say that God's children or even God's creations are flawed is to insult God as flawed. If God is perfect then so must people be. If God doesn't exist then people are the product of nature and nurture, still perfectly innocent.
"To say that God's children or even God's creations are flawed is to insult God as flawed."
While God may not be flawed, who can argue that "our" view of he, she, or it certainly has to be? And who can argue that humans are perfect or even not flawed by any reasonable measure? And that's the point of my criticizing the view that we are made in the image of something perfect, i.e., it's an insulting a(and delusional) conceit, I think.
"If God is perfect then so must people be."
I cannot follow that logic.
"If God doesn't exist then people are the product of nature and nurture, still perfectly innocent."
One must "ahem" define "innocent," I'd think. Maybe JC was correct when he asked his dad to forgive us for we know not what we do. I guess that pretty well fits one definition of the word.
Anyway, I better get my butt back in the garden where I battle to bring some order out of never ending chaos and to obtain a harvest wrung from unremitting challenges!
As the self-appointed public defender of people, I'm here to answer your question "who can argue that humans are perfect or even not flawed by any reasonable measure?"
If you had a dog that had been trained to attack little girls and it killed a little girl, would you say dogs were flawed, that breed of dog, or even that dog in particular? You would look at the circumstances and figure out why. Perhaps you'd conclude that dogs weren't meant to live with humans, or that breed, or that the dog needed to be put down, but you would see it as a combination of its nature and its nurture. Why are humans different?
JC asked his father to forgive the Roman soldiers who had mistaken him for one of the insurgents. The 'good thief/ rebel' says, 'This guy was never one of us.' And the 'bad thief/ rebel' says, 'I did it and I'd do it again because people deserve to be free.' When you realize that JC is Josephus, the God who is his Father by adoption is Caesar Vespasian, who he had acknowledged as the Messiah. So the thief who says Josephus never rebelled will be welcomed into the Roman Empire but the one who believes in Judean sovereignty deserves to die and be damned.
Order out of chaos, that's my motto!
"As the self-appointed public defender of people..."
I knew it; I'm wrong again. There is a messiah! Wink!
So the thief who covers for Josephus is welcomed into the kingdom of "heaven" while the other is not, meanwhile Josephus rises from "the dead" and ascends into "heaven," aka the empire. It surely seems to fit.
I like your views on things. Very interesting and I never had it explained that way or considered it. Fortunately I'm certainly no enemy to novelty. And yer version is as usual not only more plausible than the the standard, but more fascinating as well.
Thanks!
Haha! The possibility I'm entertaining is that the premise of A Course in Miracles, that the world is our collective dream, was discovered by Zadok and Judas and proven to themselves. They could therefore demonstrate to everyone else that the world had no power over them, meaning everyone, not just Z&J. So resurrection was inclusive and no big deal.
What really happened with Josephus is something I keep wondering. His 'brother' Titus made him, the ultimate traitor, go into Jerusalem under siege to 'negotiate.' Was Titus aiming to get him killed? One account says the zealots shot arrows at him but he escaped. Another says Titus barely escaped. Did he go in too?
So I think resurrecting was street cred, that not doing it was a clear indication of being an imposter. The tomb where he was 'buried', owned by the wealthy Joseph of Arimathea, would be Joseph son of Matthew, which parallels the gospels and the family names of Josephus, I'd bet.
Holy smokes. This stuff is way outta my area of expertise, although I've always suspected that most of it was ahuge con job, like a lot of other things!
Interesting. I wish I had teh time to dig into it but I'm already into so many rabbit holes you'd think I was lost in a Parisian subway!
Thanks for taking the time to fill me in.
I'm paraphrasing someone: if we are trying to resolve a problem with the same tools that created it in the first place we will end up solving nothing. I like David Cayley who throughout his career as a radio documentarist tried to analyse things in different angles. I found his series 'The Myth of the Secular' very well done and decided to do its 7 hour audio transcription. He is finalizing the corrections. There are many more series he did with transcriptions available. https://www.davidcayley.com/podcasts/category/Myth+of+the+Secular
"...I can't help being delusioned about this species that is supposedly the smartest."
You are singing my song there! I say that the idea that some think they're special is little more than an infantile delusion. And the idea that humans are made in the image of gawd is another. It's also at the very least an insult to whatever supreme characters exists.
Very interesting comments about the sugar industry and its domination. Let us not forget who dominated the opium trade and what they did and are apparently still doing.
I've made it thru about 20 mins of the vid, and it is excellent. Don't know if I can make it thriu 3 hours tho!
I had a lot of cleaning to do before I left my AirBnB. Manual labor is your friend! It also has an audio file in the link above, if that helps. But it does repeat, so no worries.
"Manual labor is your friend!"
I could not agree more. It's also our liberator (despite the usual sarcasm used to impugn the concept) and I was reading on another site that it cures depression. No wonder I'm a stranger to that unfortunate state of affairs!
Yes, I remember you're an able practitioner in the church of hard work. But as I remember, that was mostly outside, which makes it tricky to watch videos. It's why my dream is to bring back radio!
The last time I listened to the radio was long ago on a very boring road trip. I turned the thing on and happened to land on a Rush Limbuagh rant which I listened to for about 2 minutes and shut the thing off in disgust since he sounded like a really deranged lunatic. Little did I know that the drugs he was taking probably contributed to his moronic bombast not that I'm making excuses for that pathetic piece of blustring insanity and purveyor of canned ignorance and falsehoods. Anyway, I shut if off and never turned it on again.
Among the few things I care to listen to any longer are my wife's and my grandkids' voices and the sound of the birds, insects, and the breezes. Used to love classical music, but hardly ever listen to it anymore. (PS: In that regard ever notice how our owners subtly make fun of it by using it in animated cartoons? What a bunch of fetid cloacas that clan is!) Never have owned a teevee or subscribed to much printed media and the ones I had subscribed to I quit back in the '80s after realizing that most of it was recycled balderdash similar to the mindless hogwash presented in skoolz but with much superior graphics.
I have posted Jefferson's very similar pronouncements here already so i won't repost.
Beautifully said. Jonathon of What Do I No? posted something similar on enjoying those around you. And yes, all media has been made insipid but it doesn't have to be that way. I'll include the rest of my rant in today's video.
"Beautifully said."
Well, thank you but I never dreamed that "beautiful" would apply to my, "bunch of fetid cloacas," but I think it would be more accurate to say it was eloquent!😁 In any case, I'll take any positive reinforcement I can get!
You know, speaking of that, I cannot get it out of my mind how well thought out and written your constitution con article is. It is the best of all the things I've read on the subject or at least on par with what some of the "anti-federalists" (gawd, I cringe whenever I hear, speak, read or write that term for the very reason you so perceptively mentioned in your article) wrote.
This is the best substack that I'm aware of. Thank you.
So interesting Tereza, including comments. Thanks very much.
Thank you, Pauline. I'm having a conversation with an orthodox Jew on YT that I might post separately. Interesting stuff to see into the mindset.
Hello Terezea,
this information is in a format you may prefer , verbal and written.
Myron Fagan: The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations (1967)
BY RHODA WILSON ON JANUARY 4, 2024 •
The question of how and why the United Nations is the crux of the great conspiracy to destroy the sovereignty of the United States and the enslavement of the American people within a UN one world dictatorship is a complete and unknown mystery to the vast majority of the American people.
The reason for this unawareness of the frightening danger to our country and to the entire free world is simple. The masterminds behind this great conspiracy have absolute control of all of our mass communications media especially television, the radio, the press and Hollywood.
https://expose-news.com/2024/01/04/myron-fagan-the-illuminati-and-the-council-on-foreign-relations-1967/
Myron C. Fagan: The Illuminati and the C.F.R [Council of Foreign Relations] (1967)
Illuminati
Encyclopedia Britannica
Illuminati, designation in use from the 15th century, assumed by or applied to various groups of persons who claimed to be unusually enlightened. The word is the plural of the Latin illuminatus. According to adherents, the source of the “light” was viewed as being directly communicated from a higher source or due to a clarified and exalted condition of the human intelligence. To the former class belong the Alumbrados (Spanish: “enlightened”) of Spain. Spanish historian Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo first finds the name about 1492 (in the form aluminados, 1498) but traces them back to a gnostic origin and thinks their views were promoted in Spain through influences from Italy. One of their earliest leaders—indeed, some scholars style her as a “pre-Alumbrado”—was María de Santo Domingo, who came to be known as La Beata de Piedrahita. She was a labourer’s daughter, born in Aldeanueva, south of Salamanca, around 1485. She joined the Dominican order as a teenager and soon achieved renown as a prophet and mystic who could converse directly with Jesus Christ and the Virgin. Ferdinand of Aragon invited her to his court, and he became convinced of the sincerity of her visions. The Dominicans appealed to Pope Julius II for guidance, and a series of trials were convened under the auspices of the Inquisition. Her patrons, which by then included not only Ferdinand but also Francisco Cardenal Jiménez de Cisneros and the duke of Alba, ensured that no decision was taken against her, and she was cleared in 1510.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpd9n21uQv4&t=4326s
I've listened to part of this David and it's very comprehensive and enlightening, especially for 1967 (although I think we've gone backwards so that's not surprising.) I write about much of this in my book. Fagan doesn't mention that Taft got elected because they ran Teddy Roosevelt as a third party candidate to steal votes away. A tried and true technique.
But it's also teaching me new things and reinforcing things I've heard. I'll start from the beginning after it reaches the end from the midpoint your link launched. Thanks for recommending.
Thanks for that, David. It is always helpful to have a format I can watch while doing other things, and one I can copy and quote from. The Britannica definition seems as innocuous as the one that YT superimposes and my videos from Wikipedia. No mention of secret societies doing harm in the world!
To all of your readers the book below is the modern day version of what you have been talking about ; this is a British Think Tank , probably the most infamous which was funded by The Queen of England and then by the notorious Banksters in your country. The very least, please read the paragraph below.
Coleman : The Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations.
Page 20
By the year 2000 there was hardly any aspect of life in America into which Tavistock's tentacles had not reached and that included every level of government from local to federal, industry, trade, education and the political institutions of the nation. Every mental and psychological aspect of the nation was analyzed, recorded, profiled and stored in computer memory banks.
https://archive.org/details/ColemanTheTavistockInstituteOfHumanRelations_201903/Coleman%20-%20The%20Tavistock%20Institute%20of%20Human%20Relations%20/page/n37/mode/1up?view=theater
Thanks for adding that David. I know little about Tavistock other than the name and the notorious significance. Great to have a resource.
Hello Tereza,
I know it is a big ask for you to read the books I put your way , they take up a lot of time, which I suspect you do not have much of to spare . The opening chapter, of the Tavistock Institute, re the Russian Revolution will make you gasp, if you have not read other books on the subject in the past; and you thought you knew history .
I appreciate you telling me why it's important, David, and your appreciating my lack of time. On line books, in particular, are hard because screens aren't a medium I love unless it gives me a chance to be interactive. And there's the constant interruptions and limit to plugged in spaces. But I'll commit to reading the first chapter because I'm certain it will be revelatory.
Thank you most of all for posting this Tereza. Again G_D loves courage.
I never actually considered the extent to which Jewish religious tradition was and is applied for narrative of entitlement (or maybe I never had it discussed as clearly - at least it was excellent communication for my understanding, but I have some background context). Without context, or with willful ignorance for material reasons (including the desire to 1. harm life and 2. be dishonest(!))
Actually such a gem of piece. It must be difficult - I know - because vile people of so many feathers often also quote the same sources you do, but with different intention.
One outcome I don't think you discussed or are not aware of: nominally Jewish merchants were incredibly and disproportionately active in the central asian slave trade extending from 500 CE-1500 CE. Also of note in this: this is obscured and even countered in narratives by many scholars, typically also nominally Jewish - though Turkish National and other National scholars take such issue with it. It is fantastic but true, that world histiography (sp?) and history of the world especially in contemporary western university is dominated - sometimes exclusively - for study, funding, and narrative by nominally Jewish (which is okay) Zionist (which is my goodness the definition of not okay) sources.
Also, Tereza, why do the spooks allow some of us, to sometimes, nominally communicate?
Because what I write about in my substack - the slow murder protocols to harm learning (and the technical observations I have aren't speculations they are firsthand knowledge) - applies now to a) "Muslims" or any culture b) Arabics of any religion c) honest journalists d) leftist academics e) geniune progressives f) free thinkers g) anti-zionists. But I fear they will fold it back to just "Muslims" again, and no one will care.
Do they allow us to communicate out of fear, or boredom, or indifference?
Thank you for the appreciation, shaqer, and the additional information. Do you have any references on that? It's very interesting. I didn't even know there was a central Asian slave trade from 500-1500 CE, that's how little I know.
I'm preparing another episode on Kissinger & the Balfour Declaration that looks closely at Benjamin Freedman's talk: https://highlanderjuan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Benjamin-H-Freedman-Speech-at-the-Willard-Hotel-1961.pdf.
In it, he talks about the Khazarians being those who adopted Judaism or Talmudism and twisted it to their own purposes. I don't think we should leave unexamined ideologies lying around, like knives that are harmless unless they're pointed at you. So I'm not sure what a nominal Jew is. If it's not a race then it's an ideology. And what question does it answer? Who has the right to rule over who. Who it's okay or even required to hate. That's why I call the Torah-based belief system Shemitism because it traces the ruling dynasty back to Shem.
Those who Josephus considered the descendants of Ham and destined to be slaves were the Africans, Egyptians and parts of Asia. That was in 80 CE. I think the story of Exodus has been flipped and the Abramites were the rulers or the Pharaoh's henchmen and enforcers of the Egyptians as slaves. So maybe that makes sense that central Asia was the next victim and Africans after that.
For your last question, I'm choosing to live as if Spirit is ultimately in charge and not the spooks. If I assume we're communicating with their permission, I've given them power over me without them needing to do anything. To be able to censor, you have to either have people who are smart enough to know the truth and nefarious enough to suppress it, or you expose people inadvertently by drawing their attention to it. But I believe there's purpose in everything that happens, and that purpose is leading towards our happiness, not our demise.
I'm referencing from what I remember reading as an undergrad a long time ago - and I'm entirely a product of the Western Academy through tertiary+. So I will have to look up.
But - Bat Yeor, a controversial scholar who is marketed as an expert, and the notorious Bernard Lewis are two examples of experts who develop stable narratives of Arabic-speaking and/or Islam-prevalent locations of the world. Both Zionists, Bernard Lewis is forwarded especially as "expert of Islam" in military academies.
And I do know, Turkish authors cite the omission of nominally Jewish slave traders involved as middlemen for slave trading of Turkic and Slavic speaking people (presumably others as well). A Persian author also points out the cooperation of nominally Jewish religious authorities i.e. "rabbis" in cooperating with Mongol forces to loot their neighbors. This much I can say for a fact, that I have read as cited. But will have to look up. The rest is speculation, backed by a vibe, I will say so. Vibes shouldn't be underestimated in my experience. More things in heaven and earth I am 100% sure of that, just like I am sure that I'm not in charge and fortunately another is.
It shouldn't be just up to you to have to research everything. And these questions are not even asked. Thanks Tereza.
That's very interesting, shaqer. It would certainly fit with a religion that has one set of rules for its own and no code of morality towards the other. Your data on Iraqi Jews being pushed to emigrate to Palestine with false-flag Zionist attacks also matches what I've read elsewhere. It was a strategy because generally Jews didn't want to go to the desert outpost that was then Palestine.
Did you send me a link for Charles Upton? I appreciate your camaraderie on this journey, shaqer. I'm just scratching the surface in my research and it's all so different from what we've been told.
Thank you Tereza, that is high praise for me. I am humbled and encouraged.
Here is a video from Charles Upton's channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9tX8yxrHaA&t=6s he lives in Kentucky.
His book which I like a lot is "System of the Antichrist" - which is a critique of modern society.
He also co-wrote something with his wife called "Mysteries of the Rose" ... but I don't think I can appreciate that one at this point in life, you might be able to.
"Who is the Earth?" is the Charles Upton book I am reading right now
If you are interested in "Islamic" themes, I would suggest looking up Marshall GS Hodgson. Especially his three volume work, especially the first and second volumes. Very dense. Hodgson was/is a Christian of Quaker persuasion (not of the Richard Nixon persuasion, hehe). I like his work a lot and learned a very very great deal about myself and the world from him.
I've only watched the first five minutes and I already love Charles Upton. He goes right to the heart of the matter in this! It's not whether machines write a well-crafted poem full of evocative ambiguity, it's that poetry is the act of finding meaning. Only someone who doesn't actually read poetry, much less write poetry, would mistake the package for the contents.
Thanks for recommending him, Shaqer. I'm glad I kept this page open until I could get back to it!
I am so happy that you liked it! I think he's amazing, though maybe a bit pessimistic. But doubtless there are things which I am missing in what he says. I would love to meet him and his partner in person one day.
And I have to say this, as a reminder from a well-wisher and fellow who often worries too much: Tereza, please do be mindful of the malfeasant creatures, they are depraved and insidious and celebrate deceit. Trust your instincts. And I know you know all of this at least as well as me.
EDIT: I mention the point of the Persian chroniclers for this reason: presumably, the narrative memory of the nominally Jewish communities would recall the community in which they lived, whether dominated by Zoroastrians, Buddhists, or Muslims [sic]. It's relevant to the question of entitlement. And yet - but human beings are people who do have a sense of self-preservation, but something incredible seems here as well.
To compare: the organized migration of Iraqi Jews [sic] to Palestine in the late 1940s, with breakdown of law enforcement, agitation, misinformation, direction, and mechanical arming and fostering of miscreant elements by direct and indirect means. See also the planting of bombs in Iraqi synagogues by Zionists as part of this effort [this is easy to look up]. It is a terrible thing, most of all to exploit poor people. But the migrant Iraqi Jews had it much better from the process (at least in material terms), also their children. These communities would also have a narrative memory with Muslim and Christian neighbors. I'll just leave this as a specific case, but yes, a interpreted tradition of entitlement is corrosive, and dangerous, and contagious, and worse if that tradition is more severe.
Excuse the ramble.
CLOSE EDIT.
I will look up. But even the academy is organized in certain ways to privilege certain types of inquiry, and certain inquiries, as you well know. :| BTW you will love Charles Upton's writing when you get to it :)
Check this.:
A 2000-Year-Old Rabbinical Psyop: Did Jews Invent Christianity to Deceive Gentiles?
https://www.unz.com/article/a-2000-year-old-rabbinical-psyop-did-jews-invent-christianity-to-deceive-gentiles/#comment-6249764
Very interesting article, totally wrong in its conclusions but as always, some of the best arguments are made by those who don't understand what they're saying. Is this comment the one that talks about things inserted retroactively?
"Is this comment the one that talks about things inserted retroactively?"
Which comment are you referring to, TC? Speaking of comments, I found many of them interesting.
My take on all this, which is not based on any study of the subject, (or much interest on my part), is that whatever the truth is I'll never really know for certain, but I can probably assume that the story has been twisted and retwisted to suit the preferences of our wanna be rulers at the times they changed it., so no wonder there's so much confusion and contradiction. Kinda like the endlessly changing or continuously evolving of FDR's "New Deals" and Stalin's "5-Year Plans."
I just posted it to see what others here thought since I value the input from you and your commenters. I'm basically a tabula rasa on the subject as well as many, many others.
Your link went to a particular comment, not the article. That's why I wondered if it was the comment you were alerting me to.