In this episode, I look at the occult significance of Palestine/ Falastin as Canaan, the Divine Mother, cursed by Noah and erased by the scriptural script writers.
I think I need to live another ten lifetimes to do the research to understand this piece. I got about 5% of it (so poor is my starting knowledge of that part of the world to begin with + not really knowing what the bible version says so not much to compare to), but it is very impressive and I’ll read again a few times so it goes into my brain. Are the named authors the only ones you’ve drawn in for this piece or are there other references too? Just thinking where to start as a newbie..
Also I remember you saying to Crow about the custody thing. I was amazed to learn recently that men only fight for custody in 4% of cases. And when they do, in 93% of those cases, it’s granted to men. So it suggests that men by and large don’t fight for custody, and the ones who desperately want it will most likely get it…Yet because we live in an upside down world, “family courts are biased against men” is an all-too-common refrain…
Thank you, LoWa. Most of my research on goddess and feminism I've gotten from you, so you're ahead of the game! Other than Merlin Stone, I'm putting it together with my own biblical research. On Palestine, if you were to read one person, I'd suggest Vanessa Beeley: https://beeley.substack.com/. There are men I read too but I think there's something fundamentally different and necessary about a woman's perspective and all the other women I read on geopolitics I've found through Vanessa. But this aspect of anthropology vs the bible is from Merlin.
I just subbed Zawn. What a treasure she is! I'll do a post soon on Courting Abuse and cite this article. Your referral to Renee Gerlich was instrumental, and her observation that the first step in controlling women is the ownership of the child. It was like a tumbler in a lock just fell into place. 'Claiming' the child as your own[ed] wasn't a way men took responsibility, it was a way to enslave the mother.
So the custody crisis isn't just a consequence of patriarchy, it's the starting point--come to a head now because women's financial independence (such as it is, being enslavement to the market) threatens the very foundation of men controlling women through the children. I so appreciate your references, LoWa!
Awesome thank you! I will check out Vanessa’s work. And glad you found something useful in the authors I mentioned. Zawn’s work is solely focused around motherhood and heterosexual relationships (probably not aligned on a host of other issues you and I care about) but I still massively value and respect her work for what it offers women and the work she does to support women in abusive relationships. And it definitely aligns with my own academic research on sexism in intimate relationships, plus is written in a far more clear and understandable way than academic articles!
Yes, I agree, women do have a unique perspective and I like your work for that reason too (love your tagline “a mother’s pov on global economics, geopolitics…”).
PS if you find any more leads in the Abrahamic/A-Brahaman-ic religion connections, do let me know! I was astounded to read this in another comment of yours as Indian polytheistic religions are so often framed in opposition to Abrahamic ones. Holy macaroni!!
I watched your video on YouTube and as usual, it was a very interesting, probing, revealing and even daring excavation the essential mystery of how and why the “unholy” land’s present situation is more than meets the current eye, but an extension of some kind of unveiling of ancient historical trajectories between factions of humans. If one follows the Bible religiously, as a grand story full of tall tales and heavily-biased histories, the layers of internal dissonance and confusing contradictions can only leave the reader in a state of bafflement about what actually happened, who were the bad guys who were the good guys, what entities were they worshipping or serving, and what is the right way to live.
I venture that since no one people are inherently any more evil than another, but merely act out according to contemporary circumstance, that the region is haunted by demonic entities who love this shit: the war, the fear, and the hate. And fear is at the bottom of all that. These entities literally attach themselves to the group ( or individuals) manifesting these extreme emotions and demand more of the same from who ever is meting out the punishment and also feed off the fear of the “victims” on either side. I suggest that these demons were reactivated, reanimated from the innate dormant energetics of the place when modern Israel was (re)created. It’s a serious case of demonic possession. Every time a person is killed, the lost klingons attached to them just keep circulating between living hosts irrespective of what side they are on. Like a shared cancer that body jumps from dying host to feed off the nearest vulnerable person. Presently the demons are having a real feast. Under this theory, compassionate de-possession is the only way out of the centuries of petty quarrel. The phoney gods have got to quietly move back their respective planets
Great blog name, Glen! Thanks for watching on YT and coming here to comment, it's a far better format for conversation.
I agree with you that no one people are inherently more evil than another. That's one of the cornerstones of my perspective. My argument is that, if people are evil, then god is evil to have created them evil.
In your perspective, who created the evil demons? It seems like this would be very compatible with an evil god like Yahweh but not at all compatible with a divine mother. I know that I'd never invent demons and give them power over my kids. Would you?
We're living in a world where the atrocities done to Palestinians (I wouldn't call Israelis victims myself, although they've certainly been subjected to a lifetime of indoctrination) are tolerated. There's no universal shock and repulsion. Why wouldn't someone do something that's celebrated by their own culture and not condemned by others? They would need to rebel against everything they've been taught and everyone they know in order to question it.
What I'm saying is that this collective insanity started by 'god' giving men power over women and children. Once we accept that as natural, the last 1500 years is the logical culmination. If you create a world (as my economic plan does) that enables women to raise children securely without being dependent on a man, I don't think that war would last one generation. If it did, I might entertain the possibility of demons but now I think the Rothschilds are demonic enough.
I think you're right on. Only in the past year or so have I started to believe that the god of the Israelites is not God at all, but some demonic entity, perhaps Satan himself. I mean if God is Love, then how could he order "his chosen people" to slaughter every man, woman, and child, and even the goats and sheep?!
Seeing God as female makes more sense than God as male. Only women can give birth, so the creator of the universe and all that's in it would be more female than male.
Yes that's exactly the logic that was used for millennia in assuming the Creatrix to be a Divine Mother. And the implications go far beyond just the biological. By the time a baby is born, a mother has nurtured him or her for 9 mos. She already has a deep knowledge, intimacy and love for that baby, no matter what the circumstances of impregnating her were.
The biological sperm carrier has done the hard work of ejaculating. The role of father is earned, not given. And all the more sweet and selfless for it. I have the greatest admiration for fathers but they don't get that honorific and ownership of the child--and therefore the mother--by 'virtue' of their penis.
'Satan' is another Yahwist invention and inversion. Remember, this is the cult that created Set and Egyptian demonology when they invaded 5000 yrs ago. Hebrew has no vowels, so Set and Satan are the same, which is why the Temple of Satan changed its name back to Set. And Saturn is named for Set and I just realized this morning that the Yahwist sabbath is Saturday for Set!
What's the typical way used by the Church to get a demon out? Torture! If you kill them, they were human, if they live, it's proof they're possessed. Even in Josephus' day, he talks about children being burned alive but seeming impervious to pain--which he sees as proof they're possessed. Now who are the ones acting as demons, the children or ones lighting the fires?
If demons exist, then God is evil. The concept of evil, however, comes from the Set Cult who gave men the power to rape women because evil came from women. So evil is a self-perpetuating concept that justifies the actions that are evil by saying other people are, and therefore deserve it. No mother says 'That one was just born evil, a bad seed.' It's a male construct.
One minute you claim to be looking at the esoteric/occult but instantly begin abusing such perspective & go profane about Athena exploding out of head as an un-natural act- it is allegory so obvious I wonder if you are fit to consider such matters.
! Jesus is not ISIS & without vowels it is SS as ISIS is voweled with 'I'.
how about Je-zues = ZEUS ? What about the CHRIST WITH PAPS in revelation of John of Patmos ? What of Gematria of Christ by Bracket & leigh's discoveries ?
You seems totally unaware of ARGOTHIC green language, otherwise your work would not be so shallow on these topics.
Still, you never mention Tetragrammaton = JAH - despite being told the other day... I can not see you being much use when you have to confound these topics with fanciful thought & assertions, I wonder who taught you such rubbish & why you are regurgitating it , but I guess it is the same old tropes you are dancing to.
Im wading through your written text, whereas the video I was not concentrating as much. One thing pops out from something I read some years ago, maybe Paul Wallis ( who has much to say about the sky god “aliens” who he believes are Yahweh - much as Clif High thinks , but cliff is very opinionated about Jews). In it the writer suggest that the story of the killing of Abel by Cain is in fact a moral inversion and that it’s the symbolic account of the shepherd culture being replaced by the sacrificial patriarchal culture in ancient Mesopotamia, Abel being seen as the good son in the Bible who is with the new patriarchy and honorable sacrifices to the new god, whereas Cain as the shepherd ( the more earth connected archetype, band of Bedouins humans ) is the bad one. This being an inversion ,so the new state of affairs is ensured. Sacrifice pastoralism on the altar of militarism.
Paul Wallis and Clif High and I agree that the bible is allegory, the question is, of what? They have a less sinister view of the bible than I do, and see it as a sincere desire to describe what people didn't understand--aliens for example. But I start out with the assumption that these are humans, although potentially taller with red hair and blue eyes. And absolutely malevolent in their desire for power over others, particularly women. So I don't give them 'credit' for being supernatural, since that's what they want us to believe.
Interesting analysis of Cain and Abel. When Joseph brings his brothers to Egypt, he tells them to say they're shepherds because the Egyptians fear shepherds. The Habiru/ Hebrews in the Amarna Letters to Amenhotep say that they're roving bands of shepherds. When Abraham, who I think is the mercenary warlord Abdi-Ashirta in those Amarna Letters, describes his tribe, they're 'shepherds' except with 200 armed men. So I think shepherd is a euphemism for invading armies who use the sheep to feed themselves.
If you look at Hebrew having no vowels, Abel becomes b-l or Ba'al, the consort of the goddess. Those are my best guesses at the moment.
Very interesting. Todays genocide of Gaza started by what. Matt Guertin on a show to Max Igan walk through the body cam videos of the evidence and claim they are all AI created. In case, I think the people working for the sky good do represent evil. https://www.bitchute.com/video/PuKSq019xocX
Very interesting, Svarberg. I'll check that out when I have a chance. Love Max Igan.
My definition of evil is causing others to do harm. And there's no one who's done more of that than the Aryan 'sky gods' and their chosen peeps. But I still see it as an action, that can be changed, not as their character, which would be immutable.
I think I need to live another ten lifetimes to do the research to understand this piece. I got about 5% of it (so poor is my starting knowledge of that part of the world to begin with + not really knowing what the bible version says so not much to compare to), but it is very impressive and I’ll read again a few times so it goes into my brain. Are the named authors the only ones you’ve drawn in for this piece or are there other references too? Just thinking where to start as a newbie..
Also I remember you saying to Crow about the custody thing. I was amazed to learn recently that men only fight for custody in 4% of cases. And when they do, in 93% of those cases, it’s granted to men. So it suggests that men by and large don’t fight for custody, and the ones who desperately want it will most likely get it…Yet because we live in an upside down world, “family courts are biased against men” is an all-too-common refrain…
https://open.substack.com/pub/zawn/p/family-courts-and-child-custody-are-3a9?r=qdiky&utm_medium=ios
Thank you, LoWa. Most of my research on goddess and feminism I've gotten from you, so you're ahead of the game! Other than Merlin Stone, I'm putting it together with my own biblical research. On Palestine, if you were to read one person, I'd suggest Vanessa Beeley: https://beeley.substack.com/. There are men I read too but I think there's something fundamentally different and necessary about a woman's perspective and all the other women I read on geopolitics I've found through Vanessa. But this aspect of anthropology vs the bible is from Merlin.
I just subbed Zawn. What a treasure she is! I'll do a post soon on Courting Abuse and cite this article. Your referral to Renee Gerlich was instrumental, and her observation that the first step in controlling women is the ownership of the child. It was like a tumbler in a lock just fell into place. 'Claiming' the child as your own[ed] wasn't a way men took responsibility, it was a way to enslave the mother.
So the custody crisis isn't just a consequence of patriarchy, it's the starting point--come to a head now because women's financial independence (such as it is, being enslavement to the market) threatens the very foundation of men controlling women through the children. I so appreciate your references, LoWa!
Awesome thank you! I will check out Vanessa’s work. And glad you found something useful in the authors I mentioned. Zawn’s work is solely focused around motherhood and heterosexual relationships (probably not aligned on a host of other issues you and I care about) but I still massively value and respect her work for what it offers women and the work she does to support women in abusive relationships. And it definitely aligns with my own academic research on sexism in intimate relationships, plus is written in a far more clear and understandable way than academic articles!
Yes, I agree, women do have a unique perspective and I like your work for that reason too (love your tagline “a mother’s pov on global economics, geopolitics…”).
PS if you find any more leads in the Abrahamic/A-Brahaman-ic religion connections, do let me know! I was astounded to read this in another comment of yours as Indian polytheistic religions are so often framed in opposition to Abrahamic ones. Holy macaroni!!
Or should I say - Holy Bhagavāni!
Because it is an utter confusion & confabulation 🙄😂🤣😂
Powerful and provocative, Tereza.
Thanks so much, Howard!
I watched your video on YouTube and as usual, it was a very interesting, probing, revealing and even daring excavation the essential mystery of how and why the “unholy” land’s present situation is more than meets the current eye, but an extension of some kind of unveiling of ancient historical trajectories between factions of humans. If one follows the Bible religiously, as a grand story full of tall tales and heavily-biased histories, the layers of internal dissonance and confusing contradictions can only leave the reader in a state of bafflement about what actually happened, who were the bad guys who were the good guys, what entities were they worshipping or serving, and what is the right way to live.
I venture that since no one people are inherently any more evil than another, but merely act out according to contemporary circumstance, that the region is haunted by demonic entities who love this shit: the war, the fear, and the hate. And fear is at the bottom of all that. These entities literally attach themselves to the group ( or individuals) manifesting these extreme emotions and demand more of the same from who ever is meting out the punishment and also feed off the fear of the “victims” on either side. I suggest that these demons were reactivated, reanimated from the innate dormant energetics of the place when modern Israel was (re)created. It’s a serious case of demonic possession. Every time a person is killed, the lost klingons attached to them just keep circulating between living hosts irrespective of what side they are on. Like a shared cancer that body jumps from dying host to feed off the nearest vulnerable person. Presently the demons are having a real feast. Under this theory, compassionate de-possession is the only way out of the centuries of petty quarrel. The phoney gods have got to quietly move back their respective planets
Great blog name, Glen! Thanks for watching on YT and coming here to comment, it's a far better format for conversation.
I agree with you that no one people are inherently more evil than another. That's one of the cornerstones of my perspective. My argument is that, if people are evil, then god is evil to have created them evil.
In your perspective, who created the evil demons? It seems like this would be very compatible with an evil god like Yahweh but not at all compatible with a divine mother. I know that I'd never invent demons and give them power over my kids. Would you?
We're living in a world where the atrocities done to Palestinians (I wouldn't call Israelis victims myself, although they've certainly been subjected to a lifetime of indoctrination) are tolerated. There's no universal shock and repulsion. Why wouldn't someone do something that's celebrated by their own culture and not condemned by others? They would need to rebel against everything they've been taught and everyone they know in order to question it.
What I'm saying is that this collective insanity started by 'god' giving men power over women and children. Once we accept that as natural, the last 1500 years is the logical culmination. If you create a world (as my economic plan does) that enables women to raise children securely without being dependent on a man, I don't think that war would last one generation. If it did, I might entertain the possibility of demons but now I think the Rothschilds are demonic enough.
I think you're right on. Only in the past year or so have I started to believe that the god of the Israelites is not God at all, but some demonic entity, perhaps Satan himself. I mean if God is Love, then how could he order "his chosen people" to slaughter every man, woman, and child, and even the goats and sheep?!
Seeing God as female makes more sense than God as male. Only women can give birth, so the creator of the universe and all that's in it would be more female than male.
Yes that's exactly the logic that was used for millennia in assuming the Creatrix to be a Divine Mother. And the implications go far beyond just the biological. By the time a baby is born, a mother has nurtured him or her for 9 mos. She already has a deep knowledge, intimacy and love for that baby, no matter what the circumstances of impregnating her were.
The biological sperm carrier has done the hard work of ejaculating. The role of father is earned, not given. And all the more sweet and selfless for it. I have the greatest admiration for fathers but they don't get that honorific and ownership of the child--and therefore the mother--by 'virtue' of their penis.
'Satan' is another Yahwist invention and inversion. Remember, this is the cult that created Set and Egyptian demonology when they invaded 5000 yrs ago. Hebrew has no vowels, so Set and Satan are the same, which is why the Temple of Satan changed its name back to Set. And Saturn is named for Set and I just realized this morning that the Yahwist sabbath is Saturday for Set!
What's the typical way used by the Church to get a demon out? Torture! If you kill them, they were human, if they live, it's proof they're possessed. Even in Josephus' day, he talks about children being burned alive but seeming impervious to pain--which he sees as proof they're possessed. Now who are the ones acting as demons, the children or ones lighting the fires?
If demons exist, then God is evil. The concept of evil, however, comes from the Set Cult who gave men the power to rape women because evil came from women. So evil is a self-perpetuating concept that justifies the actions that are evil by saying other people are, and therefore deserve it. No mother says 'That one was just born evil, a bad seed.' It's a male construct.
One minute you claim to be looking at the esoteric/occult but instantly begin abusing such perspective & go profane about Athena exploding out of head as an un-natural act- it is allegory so obvious I wonder if you are fit to consider such matters.
! Jesus is not ISIS & without vowels it is SS as ISIS is voweled with 'I'.
how about Je-zues = ZEUS ? What about the CHRIST WITH PAPS in revelation of John of Patmos ? What of Gematria of Christ by Bracket & leigh's discoveries ?
You seems totally unaware of ARGOTHIC green language, otherwise your work would not be so shallow on these topics.
Still, you never mention Tetragrammaton = JAH - despite being told the other day... I can not see you being much use when you have to confound these topics with fanciful thought & assertions, I wonder who taught you such rubbish & why you are regurgitating it , but I guess it is the same old tropes you are dancing to.
Im wading through your written text, whereas the video I was not concentrating as much. One thing pops out from something I read some years ago, maybe Paul Wallis ( who has much to say about the sky god “aliens” who he believes are Yahweh - much as Clif High thinks , but cliff is very opinionated about Jews). In it the writer suggest that the story of the killing of Abel by Cain is in fact a moral inversion and that it’s the symbolic account of the shepherd culture being replaced by the sacrificial patriarchal culture in ancient Mesopotamia, Abel being seen as the good son in the Bible who is with the new patriarchy and honorable sacrifices to the new god, whereas Cain as the shepherd ( the more earth connected archetype, band of Bedouins humans ) is the bad one. This being an inversion ,so the new state of affairs is ensured. Sacrifice pastoralism on the altar of militarism.
Paul Wallis and Clif High and I agree that the bible is allegory, the question is, of what? They have a less sinister view of the bible than I do, and see it as a sincere desire to describe what people didn't understand--aliens for example. But I start out with the assumption that these are humans, although potentially taller with red hair and blue eyes. And absolutely malevolent in their desire for power over others, particularly women. So I don't give them 'credit' for being supernatural, since that's what they want us to believe.
Interesting analysis of Cain and Abel. When Joseph brings his brothers to Egypt, he tells them to say they're shepherds because the Egyptians fear shepherds. The Habiru/ Hebrews in the Amarna Letters to Amenhotep say that they're roving bands of shepherds. When Abraham, who I think is the mercenary warlord Abdi-Ashirta in those Amarna Letters, describes his tribe, they're 'shepherds' except with 200 armed men. So I think shepherd is a euphemism for invading armies who use the sheep to feed themselves.
If you look at Hebrew having no vowels, Abel becomes b-l or Ba'al, the consort of the goddess. Those are my best guesses at the moment.
Very interesting. Todays genocide of Gaza started by what. Matt Guertin on a show to Max Igan walk through the body cam videos of the evidence and claim they are all AI created. In case, I think the people working for the sky good do represent evil. https://www.bitchute.com/video/PuKSq019xocX
Very interesting, Svarberg. I'll check that out when I have a chance. Love Max Igan.
My definition of evil is causing others to do harm. And there's no one who's done more of that than the Aryan 'sky gods' and their chosen peeps. But I still see it as an action, that can be changed, not as their character, which would be immutable.