Wow, Tereza. I don’t know when I will be able to cover all that ground but I have opened and bookmarked the Big Mother Duke report. In the meantime, you always manage to trigger a random thought or anecdote. (By the way, you would be wasted in that institution of rotten apples known as a ‘parliament’.)
“If I think to myself that a woman shall make an appearance at an adjudication, then I have to say: When that would be a woman who is close to me, and if I wanted to imagine my mother would still be alive and has to sit in front of a murder in a court and decide the verdict – never, never! We don’t want that!
I also don’t want an [sic] uniformed female police to walk around and run after scamps and criminals. These are all things we actually don’t want.
Then they come naturally and say promptly: “Excuse me, but you don’t let them into the parliament as well.“ Certainly, but only because I am also satisfied that the parliament doesn’t raise the value of the woman, but it would only degrade her. I removed the men from the parliamentary service as well.
In former times … In former times I was often told: “Don’t you think that if you get the woman in the Reichstag that the woman would refine the manners of the Reichstag then and thereby …?”
I even have no interest to refine the Reichstag or to refine its manners at all, because whether honoured, knighted or ennobled, is ranting or not, this is entirely the same.
Above all, I am also convinced that, for example, the parliament at the time was nothing more than a sack of rotten apples.
Now … you will say to me: “That’s why you should put some sound ones into it, now!”
No, I prefer to leave the sound ones out, lest they become rotten, too.
It’s better … to let something die, which is destined to die.
When I look around the world today, the picture from the papers that comes to mind is: A woman’s regiment in the Soviet Union in the sharpshooting!
Or: A woman’s battalion of grenadiers in Spain!
Or … All I can say to the representatives of this type of female equality: I would not be a man, if I wanted to tolerate such a thing.
I experienced the war. I know how hard it is. I know how many men’s nerves have been shattered by this war. I have often seen them return by the dozens, doddering, completely ruined and broken!
The idea that a girl or a woman has to take it upon herself …. I could have no respect for the German men then!
Either they shall take responsibility for this or they shall resign!
As long as we have a healthy male gender – and we National Socialists shall ensure it – no female sharpshooters or grenadiers will be trained in Germany. That’s no equality, but in reality inferior rights for women, because it’s harder for women than for men. For her it is much more terrible than for man.
I could say just as well that I am arming children in future and sending them to war.
We won’t do it.
But apart from that, before our very eyes there is a vast expanse of job opportunities and work area for the woman, because for us the woman has been the most faithful work and life companion of the man at all times.
They often said: “You want to remove women form all professions!“
On the whole, I will give her the only chance of being able to marry and to assist her to found an own family and to have children, because she would then – and this is my conviction now – benefit our people the most, of course.
For that’s clear.
And if you need to understand it from me: If I have a female lawyer in front of me these days and it doesn’t matter how much she has achieved, and next to her is a mother of five, six, seven children and they are in great health and well-educated by her, then I want to say: From the eternal point of view of the eternal value of our people the woman - who is able to have children and has children and raised them and thereby gave our people the further ability to live in the future – has achieved more. She has done more. She assists us to avoid the death of our people “
Thanks for continuing to deepen my understanding of the enigmatic Hitler. I'm in agreement about the military, I think. But it skews my perspective to be in a country with a military that's only been used for aggression. If the military was defensive, I might change my mind.
• Adolf Hitler - speech at the Reichstag - Berlin, May 21, 1935
Yet even in the Friedensdiktat of Versailles it was expressly provided that Germany’s reduction in arms was to be effected first only in order to enable the others to reduce their arms as well. And now this example may serve to illustrate the extent to which the concept of collective cooperation was violated by those very parties who are today its most vociferous advocates.
Germany performed the obligations imposed in the Treaty of Versailles with nothing short of zealousness. Financially, up to the complete collapse of its finances; economically, up to the total destruction of its economy; militarily, up to a complete lack of defenses. I may repeat here in general terms the facts of Germany’s performance of the treaties which are contested by no one.
The following were destroyed in the Army:
1) 59,000 guns and barrels;
2) 130,000 machine guns;
3) 31,000 trench mortars and barrels;
4) 6,007,000 rifles and carbines;
5) 243,000 MG barrels;
6) 28,000 gun carriages;
7) 4,390 trench mortar carriages;
8) 38,750,000 shells;
9) 16,550,000 hand grenades and rifle grenades;
10) 60,400,000 live fuzes;
11) 491,000,000 small arms ammunition;
12) 335,000 tons of shell cases;
13) 43,515 tons of cartridge cases;
14) 37,600 tons of gunpowder;
15) 79,000 ammunition gauges;
16) 212,000 telephone sets;
17) 1,072 flamethrowers, etc.
Further destroyed were: sledges, mobile workshops, anti-aircraft vehicles, limbers, steel helmets, gas masks, machines of the former war industry, and rifle barrels.
Further destroyed in the air were:
1) 15,714 fighter planes and bombers;
2) 27,757 aircraft engines.
At sea, the following were destroyed: 26 capital ships, four coastal tanks, four battle cruisers, 19 light cruisers, 21 training ships and special ships, 83 torpedo boats, and 315 submarines.
Also destroyed were motor vehicles of all types, chemical warfare and, in part, anti-gas defense equipment, propellants, explosives, searchlights, sighting devices, range finders and sound rangers, optical instruments of all kinds, harnesses, etc.; all airplane and airship hangars, etc.
Hence in a genuine act of self-sacrifice, Germany fulfilled all of the conditions for cooperation in a collective sense in keeping with the American President’s thinking.
At the latest upon the consummation of Germany’s disarmament, the world should, for its part, have taken the same step toward establishing equality. It is merely one proof of the accuracy of this view that there was no dearth of admonishing and warning voices in the other peoples and in the other states who endorsed the performance of this duty. I wish to cite only a few of these men-who certainly cannot be referred to as friends of today’s Germany-in order to refute, by their own statements, those who seem to he suffering from amnesia and cannot recall that the Treaty of Versailles contained the contractual obligation not only for Germany to disarm, but for the other states as well."
I am trying to find a link to that individual speech as there is much more that needs to be cited. Stay tuned.
"... those who seem to he suffering from amnesia and cannot recall that the Treaty of Versailles contained the contractual obligation not only for Germany to disarm, but for the other states as well."
From the same speech (somewhat redacted to highlight the essential points)
• Adolf Hitler - speech at the Reichstag - Berlin, May 21, 1935
“When I now proceed from these general remarks to fix my aim more closely on the current problems at hand, I arrive at the following position of the German Reich Government:
1. The German Reich Government rejects the resolution passed in Geneva on April 17. It was not Germany which unilaterally breached the Treaty of Versailles; the Diktat of Versailles was unilaterally breached in regard to the points in question and thus rendered invalid by those very powers which could not bring themselves to follow up the reduction in arms required of Germany by one of their own as had been contractually stipulated.
[…] the German Reich Government considers it necessary to make a sharp distinction between the Treaty of Versailles, which is based upon a division of the nations into victors and vanquished, and the League of Nations, which must be based upon the equal worth and equal rights of all its members.
This equality of rights must be a practicable equality and extend to include all of the functions and property rights comprising international life.
2. As a consequence of the non-performance of the disarmament obligations on the part of the other States, the German Reich Government has, for its part, renounced those articles which, as a consequence of the one-sided burden now placed upon Germany in violation of the Treaty, constitute an indefinite discrimination of the German nation.
3. The German Reich Government does not intend to sign any treaty which it does not feel able to fulfill. It will, however, scrupulously comply with every treaty signed voluntarily, even if same was drawn up prior to its having taken office and coming to power. It will particularly abide by and perform all of the obligations arising from the Locarno Pact as long as the other parties are willing for their part to adhere to this Treaty. The German Reich Government holds that respecting the demilitarized zone constitutes for a sovereign state an enormously important contribution to the appeasement of Europe. It feels bound, however, to point out that the continued increase in troops on the other side can by no means be viewed as a complement to these endeavors.
4. The German Reich Government is willing at all times to participate in a system of collective cooperation with the goal of safeguarding peace in Europe, but feels it would then be necessary to do justice to the law of perpetual evolution by keeping amendments to the treaty in reserve. It feels that a stipulation allowing such an evolution of the treaty would be instrumental in safeguarding peace, while choking off any necessary change would amount to bottling up the ingredients for ensuing explosions.
5. The German Reich Government is of the opinion that the goal of rebuilding European cooperation cannot be achieved by means of foisting conditions upon one side
6. The German Reich Government is basically willing to conclude pacts of non- aggression with its respective neighboring states and to supplement these pacts by all such provisions designed to isolate those who would wage war and to limit the center of war.
7. The German Reich Government is willing to consent to an air pact to supplement the Pact of Locarno and to enter into talks with this aim.
8. The German Reich Government has disclosed the extent to which the new German Wehrmacht will be built up. It will under no circumstances retreat from these parameters. It does not regard the fulfillment of its program on land, in the air or at sea as constituting any threat whatsoever to another nation. It is nonetheless willing at all times to perform those limitations on its armament which are undertaken by the other states as well. The German Reich Government has already announced certain limitations of its own regarding its intentions. It has thus best illustrated its good will to avoid an unlimited arms race. Its limitation on German air armaments at a level of parity with the other respective major western nations makes it possible at any time to fix a maximum figure with which Germany would then also be obliged to comply.
[…]
Germany has neither the intention, the need nor the means to enter into any kind of new naval rivalry.
9. The German Reich Government is willing to take an active part in all endeavors which can lead to a practical limitation of boundless armaments.
10. The German Reich Government is willing to consent to any limitation which leads to the abolishment of those heaviest weapons which are particularly suitable as weapons of attack.
11. Germany declares itself willing to consent to any limitation on the caliber of artillery, battleships, cruisers, and torpedo boats.
[…] Furthermore, it repeats its assurance that it will join any international limitation or ban on arms going into effect concurrently.
12. The German Reich Government is of the opinion that all attempts to effectively ease certain tensions between individual states in the form of international or multilateral agreements must be to no avail until appropriate measures have been taken to prevent irresponsible elements from poisoning the public opinion of the peoples by the written and spoken word and in movies and the theater.
13. The German Reich Government is willing at all times to consent to an international agreement which, by effective means, serves to prohibit and render impossible all attempts by third parties to interfere in other states. It must, however, demand that such a settlement go into force on an international scale and equally benefit all states
[…] The peoples want peace. The governments must be able to maintain it! I believe that the restoration of German military power will become a factor in this peace-not because we plan to increase this power to some pointless magnitude, but because the simple fact of its existence does away with a dangerous vacuum in Europe. Germany does not intend to increase its armaments to an infinite degree. We do not have 10,000 bombers and we will not build 10,000 bombers; on the contrary: we have imposed upon ourselves the limitation which guarantees, in our opinion, the protection of the nation without violating the concept of the possibility of a collective security and a respective agreement. We would be most pleased were such an agreement to afford us the opportunity to make use of the diligence of our Volk for production processes more beneficial than those of manufacturing instruments for the destruction of human life and values.
[...]
May other peoples also succeed in putting into bold words the true yearning of their innermost depths. He who would brandish the torch of war in Europe can desire nothing but chaos. We, however, live in the firm conviction that our age will witness not the decline of the West, but its resurrection. That Germany may furnish an immortal contribution to this great work is our proud hope and our unshakeable belief.
Article 12 is particularly significant: "12. The German Reich Government is of the opinion that all attempts to effectively ease certain tensions between individual states in the form of international or multilateral agreements must be to no avail until appropriate measures have been taken to prevent irresponsible elements from poisoning the public opinion of the peoples by the written and spoken word and in movies and the theater."
This is in reply to your excellent quotes. There's a YT commenter, Von Crowne, who wrote, "Conjuring Hitler. It's a fine book, but you're no where near to the end of your journey. I could give you the short cut, but nobody accepts it that hasn't put in the work. You've fallen into a nest of guardians, whose aim is to steer you away from the truth. Check out Miles Mathis and Simon Shack, and know it's another trap, but nearer the truth. Good luck. It's a Mystery worthy of Kings."
I replied, "Thanks for the recommendations, Von Crowne. There are a couple of my readers who've put far more work into this than I have. The two of them don't agree. One sees Hitler as having acted with honor throughout, towards Germans and Jews. The other, who reposts some of Firestarter's work, sees Hitler as an agent of Londonium and the Rothschilds along with being a Rothschild. And I thought that was also what Mathis comes to, but it's been awhile since I read him. I haven't read Simon Shack.
"I tend to agree with the latter perspective. I only read the prologue to Conjuring Hitler but, as an economist, Guido seemed mired in the debt-money paradigm. Feder's system doesn't go as far as mine but if Germany had repudiated the bankers, and replaced it with a sovereign currency, they didn't need British funding. Did Hitler need it to win and betray the National Socialists and German people? Likely.
"Kate is right though, that my Substack gets deep conversations going. If you want to test your theories on this mystery with others who have done the work (and I agree that I'm not one of them) you should post your thoughts there."
Having read these quotes though, I'm reversing my position again. This is brilliant and honest statescraft. No agent of the Rothschilds would craft these words. I think what you're doing is important--it's not just reading what people wrote about Hitler, it's also reading him directly. Like Putin, his words speak for themselves.
You are so very, very kind Tereza. It is just my journey. I had no idea I would be reading that when trying to understand Putin and Russia (and hence the world) present and past.
Speaking of reading their words directly - oh my, you have just issued me a challenge to Book Mention (that's now a verb!) "The Governance of China" by Xi Jinping. I haven't read the four volumes from cover to cover but what I have read will astound our readers. But I have to finish what I am working on and then another. I will keep it churning over.
You are a walking (if fingers can be said to ...) diplomatic ambassador to the world, past, present and future. IMAGINE if diplomacy and foreign relations were real things! I look forward to Xi and whatever projects are in the interim.
hola, tereza. really superb essay today. great and broad and engaging discussion.
i think you are right about the last word nature of jasun's stance and adroitly pointed out that similarity with the paywalled nature of his stack.
i don't think running away from language is any more productive to our existence here than is becoming a hermit. in a way it is a kind of adolescent immature _reaction_ to not accepting life as it is. a kind of by-pass i'm seeing more and more clearly as a key part of our character: stay young by by-passing our personal responsibility to own our power, and a key part of that is appropriate use of words. the ptb have been masters of using words, inappropriately. a huge part of that has been to teach us we are powerless and to bow to their abuse of language as creating falsehood and confusion. the silent monastery in spain is not the solution. gautama said the same thing, and even had a kind of youthful rebellion at his monastery when someone tried to splinter his students by leading a hermitic revolt. (it failed.) no, guatama insisted that being in the world as it is is the key to transforming the world.
so much more i could write. i will stop here as i go back to my own essay which is due tomorrow.
and thank you for mentioning me and the _lord of the flies_ essay! that was unexpected and a very interesting connection you made between your topic of language and its various purposes including schismogenesis — which the book _lord of the rings_ created in me and, as you commented, in you and other people who also commented on my essay.
how appropriate that you would be my first comment here, Guy. I wasn't trying to pull a sleazy NLP mirroring technique on you with that lower-case letter, my pinky just slipped off the shift ;-) I was eagerly anticipating your thoughts. I'm glad that it resonated with you. Having your Lord of the Flies essay come up with my Hitler Journey was a nice reminder of how long and in how many different forms our dialogue has been going on. Looking forward to your next installment!
Hi Tereza, Thank you for this! Do you have more expanded insights on Autism? I'm looking through your articles as time allows and I really enjoy and appreciate your point of view. If not, would you kindly point me in the direction of some that you like or have helped you understand the Autism phenomenon? Thanks again. 🌷
I'm afraid I don't really have any resources, Heather. I'm making up theories from the top of my head (others may suggest other anatomy). It's just been my observations. My oldest daughter worked with autistic men for a brief time and it's her theory that almost all men are somewhere on the spectrum. But one of her best friends is a woman who also misses those social cues. My daughter has been training her for almost 20 years in how to have a conversation, and listen to the other person. I'm sure I'm getting much wrong at the extreme ends, I just mean the more common, even ubiquitous, part of the spectrum.
So glad you brought this up Heather. My 18 yr old son is autistic. He was born 3 months premature. At the time, I had zero clue what the medical industrial complex was doing all these years, to poison the population. The first Vax they gave him was Dtap, not sized to the body weight of a premature baby. He only weighed 2 lbs.
Every time I think of this, it pisses me off. He could have developed normal.
In Japan, there's a law strictly enforced that babies cannot be vaccinated until they are past 2yrs old. Their SIDs rate is next to zero; their autism rate is comparable to the Omish.
Autism is a feature rather than a side effect. You can probably guess ---- after I have gone through as much as I have since his birth, there shall be no further vaccines in my family.
I'm humbled to be part of this conversation between you and Heather. What a heavy experience to go through as a parent. And such hard-won knowledge. It makes my heart ache, the things that didn't need to happen. I'm honored that I can add any shape and meaning. Heather, the archetypes of the heroine's journey seems so apt. There is a major tipping of the balance that feels like it's happening now. I'm glad that the mystical seems practical and love that image of adding a warrior ring to your braid. Blessings to you both.
I had another thought I wanted to add. I often thought, when I was a hospice volunteer, how I could survive if one (or more) of my children died. Here's the only belief I ever thought might enable that: this child needed to be in the world with the exact lifespan they would have. Somewhere, before they were born, I was given a choice: this exact child for this many years or any other child for a normal lifespan. No matter what, I would always choose that child for as many years as I could get.
Maybe your children needed to be in the world exactly as they are. To develop normally was never an option. But somewhere there was a cosmic choice of whether that child would be born to you or to some other parents. You had the strength and the love to choose this child over any other. You knew that you could provide what this child needs. And this child would provide you with the special insight you needed to make sense of the world. It is a hero[ine]'s journey.
Very profound and very true. In the physical sense, there is Being, Consciousness, and Bliss----- or....
Existence--- Awareness--- Fulfillment.
All this rests within Balance:
There is Kala -- Time in the true sense.
There is Kali -- Action in the true sense. Time doesn't exist in a sequential way, we are experiencing it that way, as our sense of Reality. Reality is subjective to the Individuated Self but Reality is not Truth.
When I learned what the "I" really is and the sense of "I am that I am," it was through the Heart, not Mind. When we come here, all we ever want to do is get back to where we came from, the Eternity of Oneness. Because it is Pure Love. Life is not opposite of Death, yet due to the human nature, we become induced to see it as opposites. We really don't exist as separate beings We are Being -- Itself.
I hope what I say here helps 🙏 No matter what the difficulty, I will stand with Life and Being. Having buried a few people who were close to me, I realize they are Never gone. All is One.
Hi there, I really appreciate your candor. I experience a very similar situation to yours, and I definitely lean way toward the vaccination-injury as causation. I also know that certain genetic traits passed down from both sides have contributed to the severity of the condition. This is, in my humble opinion, why not everyone with Autism has the same deficits in each domain. I have many more suspicions, of course, and I've been reluctant to express them publicly, mainly because of the "preaching to the choir" aspect of it. And the sheer mental and emotional exhaustion of it all.
Also, I must confess that I am no longer angry about it. One of the reasons I enjoy Tereza so much is because her articles have inspired me to pick my imagination back up again when contemplating my own "Heroine's Journey." It really helps to have a mystical point of view, rather than a solely materialistic one. For a while there, I forgot about the many archetypal facets of this life I have chosen. Lately, I've taken to letting go a little better and focusing on what works one day at a time. There are still major hiccups --and Big pHarma looms -- but on a Hero's Journey, each small win is like adding a warrior ring to my braid. Blessings and Healing to you and your miraculous son. 🌷
Wholeheartedly appreciated, Heather; the Mystical perspective is indeed most important. It's the Spiritual that keeps life clear and beautiful. Blessings to you.🙏
"The Matrix has it backwards. We’re in an illusion of pain and death, suffering and danger, but reality is an ever-expanding collidescope (sic) of delight and imagination." I love this, and fully agree. On the subject of imagination, I have considered often that the inability of so many to recognize the pysop that was Covid (which seen, opens us to up to the mechanism and ubiquity) came down to a lack of imagination.
Those guardrails installed in our minds through so many stories and steering, has kept us on the normie road, and for many, going beyond and being targeted as a 'conspiracy theorist' seems a stigma too far. We pay a price for wanting to belong to the world, even when that world is driving over a clif.
The mystery of 'mother' in its deepest, womb-like sense, is under obvious assault. What are we to make of a world where the greatest mysteries, and the greatest expression of love and creation are pushed aside? Yes, the Matrix would have you think taking the red pill leads to a cold, isolated world of ongoing attack and paranoia. It's the opposite, it's a return to sanity and the every day miracle of life.
This is the shadow side of red-pillers - nothing but dark hollows in which we can get lost at best, or meet our end at worse.
Red pilling is shedding illusion, in its light-side, and opening us back up to grounded reality, it's seeing through the illusion to return us back to life itself, as it is. You don't get any closer than a mother who cares for her child. A world where Nature again sits center in respect and awe and mundanity.
I'll have to read through again. As I said, so much here. Thanks, as always, Tereza for igniting thought, imagination and question. Best.
This is not relevant to your comment, Kathleen, but I wanted to put it somewhere. I'm at BWI and coming out of the bathrooms are wall sized murals titled 'Jet Streams over Rooftops.' They're very clear, crisscrossed geoengineered trails, some of them spiraling out the way that only magnets on nano-aluminum can produce. Normalizing?
And now the entire boarding area, minus me, has been standing at the windows with their hands over their heart, as instructed, while the coffin of a military member who died in the course of duty is loaded. They've been standing for 10 minutes, taking photos. How has it come to this? They may change my boarding position from A to Z.
Kathleen, you really do complete my sentences. I won't have time to respond as fully as I'd like, since my plane boards in a bit, but I read what I wrote, reflected by you, and am astonished that you brought it to a deeper place (as did Tonika and Mary). The mystery of mother, yes! The red pill of paranoia, no! The red pill of shedding illusion and getting back to a mother caring for her child, yes! yes! yes!
Appreciating Peter's framing: What Does Technology Want - which leads to the question: Is there some sort of external force behind this technological drive? (Yes) Jasun affirms this idea that there is an external force adding the proviso that it must have gotten inside us.
Bingo. (I don't expect we'll agree here, Tereza, but maybe some crossovers)
This was so gratifying to hear. Not because it's a pleasant, but because I think it's right- the broad strokes of it at any rate. Not claiming to understand the details by any means.
But infiltration - on multiple levels, yes.
I don't like 'Satan' as descriptor though, for several reasons, mostly it casts us back into a pre-made mold that we've already begun to dislodge ourselves from, so, I'll pass.
More significantly I don't actually think this non-human element - which has been a cosmic sized wrench in the works - is organic or natural. It copies and replicates. It's AI-like. (Hence the transhuman AI like world it seeks to use us to create.)
It's been here a long time. It has already messed with our biology.
It can get in and take over to varying degrees, so very parasitical. (Has a lot to do with frequency resonance of the host. If your frequency is in a bandwidth that is outside its reach, it can't penetrate.)
Largely non-physical, operating interdimensionally as energy thought-forms that need hosts to live and feed off of. (Not really hard to imagine. Propaganda is a mind-virus of sorts, once 'entered' and accepted we have a tendency to propagate it ourselves, repeat it over and over, as in 'safe and effective.' This is an example of 'take-over'.
It isn't a human who went 'bad' and used their freewill to do bad things.
Surely this is what it wants us to think; that these are human attributes and drives.
It's not from the same Source as humans. (Though perhaps there is an ultimately unifying context in which even this is integrated; this too just being part of the dream of separation. I like to think so.)
It would like us to accept its attributes as aspects of humanity. Take them on and identify with them. Wants us to believe that we are forever struggling with demons and our own evil impulses are expressed in things like forever wars and greed. Setting us up to forever require an external 'God' to forgive us, redeem us and of course, in this model, we learn our only recourse as sinners is pray, obey and pay.
What a scam.
This is not the case. This is the con.
Humans are far more elevated than that. We have our own sovereignty, our own connection to Source and don't need to be 'herded' by anyone or anything.
We are on the cusp of this slave-system technology breaking up, and so we will be breaking out. What humanity really is, freed, will again take root - here on our planet, our home - aligned with the Natural world set-up and guided by Universal Law.
I'll just add that we don't have to fear this parasitical non-human force - we are far more impressive than it. Far. More. Impressive. (It works really hard at containing us.)
We do have to discern its presence, recognize where it shows up (everywhere) to limit us and our innate abilities, our self-referencing freedom. We do have to choose not to go along with it.
'No' is our greatest weapon.
It has gotten really far. Yet it ultimately fails.
This is what's happening, imo. A deep shaking off of the invisible (and now visible) shackles we were born into.
I'm so glad we can have this conversation, Kathleen. I feel that it's like Julius and Nefahotep figuring out what Hitler really was. They both agree that he isn't what we're told and keep adding new information where I go back and forth, unable to reach any conclusion with certainty. What we know is that it's an important portion of the puzzle.
Like them, you and I agree that the Bible isn't what we're told it is. My last piece on it dissected it at the literal level and also at the mythos level as a depiction of God. The next level is maybe Biglio's, that neutral observers were making sense of otherworldly being and phenomenon (still need to watch, I may have that wrong.)
The third paradigm might be that worldly rulers invented a pseudo-mythos to convince us they're gods and otherworldly beings, destined to rule.
Maybe a fourth paradigm is that it's a psychoanalysis of our dream of guilt, shame, fear and blame. It shows us what we need to forgive in ourselves.
A fifth paradigm is that it's a coded military-psyop strategy in which they're required to warn us so that, if we don't figure it out, we're a willing sacrifice.
And a sixth is that it's a puzzle to be deciphered from the spirit that wants us to wake up and create the benevolent 'reality' that's one step from Reality.
All but the first could be true at the same time. I really like your parasitic interdimensional non-human energy form that requires a certain frequency to be receptive. All of the degradation of our physical and mental capacities, the toxicity of our food and environment, make us vulnerable. But it's not human or human nature.
You've answered my question of how do we write this into the script so it's a happy ending. Maybe the 'waking up' can be almost instantaneous for human=kind. That's something I'll give deep consideration.
And I genuinely believe that even as we suss through so much confusion and pysops and various, obvious attacks on humans, somewhere and somehow - that we can still access - nothing happened.
How can these two things be true at once?
It must have something to do with our multidimensional selves and the role of time and space, maybe part of the game of hide and seek... But IDK.
I was also moved by the above passage for the reasons Kathleen mentions. Perhaps it’s my own priors that lead me to agree with it. I was especially provoked by the passage that followed about how god would love his children at least as much as I, as a mother, would. It’s interesting how much gets twisted in dogma. As if it the main purpose was control to begin with.
I would need to watch the relevant podcast to comment further on its interesting points. And although this isn’t quite about the topic, I thought I’d mention a strange discovery: I saw a video (no longer can I find it online) of Peter Duke, George Webb and Mark Kulacz casually talking around a table. It was frim 2019. I had no idea any of them knew each other prior to covid. It struck me as strange; I assumed they all met after the plandemonium. It makes me wonder if there is a network of alternative media personalities that work together in some fashion. Just mentioning and not insinuating nefarios intentions.
That is interesting! I can't do the livestream lifestyle but I get Mark's notices. He's installing his cement steps at the same time as me, I left them pouring a walkway while I drove to the airport. But that is curious that they all knew each other before and were podcasting pre-CovidCon.
So well said, Kathleen. I'll add that my hypno-hubby often explains to new clients that the phrase, "It's only your imagination!" has been used to disengage us from our greatest power: the power of creation.
Tereza, I can't help but laugh at the absurdity of piling on technology to do the simplest of things: returning to (literally) Mother Nature. Hmm...I feel a post coming on...
So many great observations and thought connections as usual, Tereza. Your point about the Metaverse particularly resonates this morning as I just wrote a piece last night about the Apple Vision Pro (or rather, mostly shared a brilliant one that somebody else wrote and elaborated upon that), another way to take away our humanity. And your phrase “the disenwombed”… A friend of mine (the one I was staying with over Xmas when I was going for walks and listening to you a lot) was advised to have a hysterectomy to treat other health issues. I saw her this weekend and she told me she feels empty and lost, that she doesn’t know who she is anymore. 😔
Yes, I read your wonderful article but have been flying between land and sky ;-) The photo was heartbreaking, everything they're telling us real life is that we have to escape. I even read some crap--and this was awhile ago--that we needed to provide equity in access to digital escapes so that people with less ability to be in nice places in real life weren't deprived. It's another slick bait-and-switch using our compassion against us.
Oh I feel so bad for your friend. I hope that we imagine this new world into existence soon because the womb-man is a state of mind, one that men would do well to provide for others, not retreat into. The maternal is something I'd like to see us become as a society. It isn't just that technology is replacing the Big Mother, but we're also being reduced to permanent infantilism. We're not thinking like parents of the next generation, whether or not we are individually.
Thank you for linking my post, Tereza! Words and their meanings and how language changes and morphs over time is a fascinating topic that I wish I had more time to explore. I love to make up new ones, thus UnPsyOppable... your posts are always thought provoking!
I only worry that, for me, UnPsyOppable would call down the imps of fate to laugh at me, the next time I figure one out that I'm totally oblivious to now!
Thanks for annotating that with the misattributions corrected, Peter. I particularly like this one, "A "universal quantifier" is a form of distortion. The cognitive dissonance/momentary trance state can be triggered by any question that reveals a discrepancy between a perception and a new-found reality. The patterns are doors.."
And this one: "This was Bateson's colleague Robert Dilts, who coined "sleight-of-mouth" to the 14 responses to a cause-effect/complex equivalence linguistic pattern. An example here: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/app/post/edit/1751745." Great phrase, sleight of mouth. And even though it's not 14 Retorts to Anything, someone should write that.
I think that primarily I kept assuming your sources said those well-phrased clever things, rather than you. Happy to be corrected!
And now, from your kind invitation, I'm in a quandary. I'd love to hear George's reaction to the Jill quote and compare some notes on Malone. Yet I'm compiling a whole list in my head of things I'd like to talk about with you. I think I'd like to do the one-on-one talk to be able to go deeper, and I'm sure my path will cross with George another time. Thank you again for that generous response!
Oh nose...one of the Horsemen won't be going to Belgium anymore? Well, they do have some dynamite ales there, so maybe book me a plane ride to one of the few places on the planet where there's a vanishingly small chance of encountering the dude. This next one's for him...and for you, since you seem to like brass musical instruments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkVLRsMdBMo
Same song, but better electrocution (promo code: Norm Crosby). Is there a way to persuade Mike Yeadon & Phil Lesh to compare family trees? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rwSelzaH-8
Can we rename him El Caballo de la Lusitania (one of the current era's suspected false flags)? Meanwhile, perhaps she's not so stable, but I'll take a dose of optimism where I can find it, even at a Clinton inauguration event... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHPPYT9dj9g
Wow, Tereza. I don’t know when I will be able to cover all that ground but I have opened and bookmarked the Big Mother Duke report. In the meantime, you always manage to trigger a random thought or anecdote. (By the way, you would be wasted in that institution of rotten apples known as a ‘parliament’.)
• Hitler speech on role of women - (six minutes)
https://odysee.com/@DawnofResistance2:9/On-Women-2:8?src=embed&t=15.613242
I have transcribed for your readers:
“If I think to myself that a woman shall make an appearance at an adjudication, then I have to say: When that would be a woman who is close to me, and if I wanted to imagine my mother would still be alive and has to sit in front of a murder in a court and decide the verdict – never, never! We don’t want that!
I also don’t want an [sic] uniformed female police to walk around and run after scamps and criminals. These are all things we actually don’t want.
Then they come naturally and say promptly: “Excuse me, but you don’t let them into the parliament as well.“ Certainly, but only because I am also satisfied that the parliament doesn’t raise the value of the woman, but it would only degrade her. I removed the men from the parliamentary service as well.
In former times … In former times I was often told: “Don’t you think that if you get the woman in the Reichstag that the woman would refine the manners of the Reichstag then and thereby …?”
I even have no interest to refine the Reichstag or to refine its manners at all, because whether honoured, knighted or ennobled, is ranting or not, this is entirely the same.
Above all, I am also convinced that, for example, the parliament at the time was nothing more than a sack of rotten apples.
Now … you will say to me: “That’s why you should put some sound ones into it, now!”
No, I prefer to leave the sound ones out, lest they become rotten, too.
It’s better … to let something die, which is destined to die.
When I look around the world today, the picture from the papers that comes to mind is: A woman’s regiment in the Soviet Union in the sharpshooting!
Or: A woman’s battalion of grenadiers in Spain!
Or … All I can say to the representatives of this type of female equality: I would not be a man, if I wanted to tolerate such a thing.
I experienced the war. I know how hard it is. I know how many men’s nerves have been shattered by this war. I have often seen them return by the dozens, doddering, completely ruined and broken!
The idea that a girl or a woman has to take it upon herself …. I could have no respect for the German men then!
Either they shall take responsibility for this or they shall resign!
As long as we have a healthy male gender – and we National Socialists shall ensure it – no female sharpshooters or grenadiers will be trained in Germany. That’s no equality, but in reality inferior rights for women, because it’s harder for women than for men. For her it is much more terrible than for man.
I could say just as well that I am arming children in future and sending them to war.
We won’t do it.
But apart from that, before our very eyes there is a vast expanse of job opportunities and work area for the woman, because for us the woman has been the most faithful work and life companion of the man at all times.
They often said: “You want to remove women form all professions!“
On the whole, I will give her the only chance of being able to marry and to assist her to found an own family and to have children, because she would then – and this is my conviction now – benefit our people the most, of course.
For that’s clear.
And if you need to understand it from me: If I have a female lawyer in front of me these days and it doesn’t matter how much she has achieved, and next to her is a mother of five, six, seven children and they are in great health and well-educated by her, then I want to say: From the eternal point of view of the eternal value of our people the woman - who is able to have children and has children and raised them and thereby gave our people the further ability to live in the future – has achieved more. She has done more. She assists us to avoid the death of our people “
Thanks for continuing to deepen my understanding of the enigmatic Hitler. I'm in agreement about the military, I think. But it skews my perspective to be in a country with a military that's only been used for aggression. If the military was defensive, I might change my mind.
Now look what I have started ...
• Adolf Hitler - speech at the Reichstag - Berlin, May 21, 1935
Yet even in the Friedensdiktat of Versailles it was expressly provided that Germany’s reduction in arms was to be effected first only in order to enable the others to reduce their arms as well. And now this example may serve to illustrate the extent to which the concept of collective cooperation was violated by those very parties who are today its most vociferous advocates.
Germany performed the obligations imposed in the Treaty of Versailles with nothing short of zealousness. Financially, up to the complete collapse of its finances; economically, up to the total destruction of its economy; militarily, up to a complete lack of defenses. I may repeat here in general terms the facts of Germany’s performance of the treaties which are contested by no one.
The following were destroyed in the Army:
1) 59,000 guns and barrels;
2) 130,000 machine guns;
3) 31,000 trench mortars and barrels;
4) 6,007,000 rifles and carbines;
5) 243,000 MG barrels;
6) 28,000 gun carriages;
7) 4,390 trench mortar carriages;
8) 38,750,000 shells;
9) 16,550,000 hand grenades and rifle grenades;
10) 60,400,000 live fuzes;
11) 491,000,000 small arms ammunition;
12) 335,000 tons of shell cases;
13) 43,515 tons of cartridge cases;
14) 37,600 tons of gunpowder;
15) 79,000 ammunition gauges;
16) 212,000 telephone sets;
17) 1,072 flamethrowers, etc.
Further destroyed were: sledges, mobile workshops, anti-aircraft vehicles, limbers, steel helmets, gas masks, machines of the former war industry, and rifle barrels.
Further destroyed in the air were:
1) 15,714 fighter planes and bombers;
2) 27,757 aircraft engines.
At sea, the following were destroyed: 26 capital ships, four coastal tanks, four battle cruisers, 19 light cruisers, 21 training ships and special ships, 83 torpedo boats, and 315 submarines.
Also destroyed were motor vehicles of all types, chemical warfare and, in part, anti-gas defense equipment, propellants, explosives, searchlights, sighting devices, range finders and sound rangers, optical instruments of all kinds, harnesses, etc.; all airplane and airship hangars, etc.
Hence in a genuine act of self-sacrifice, Germany fulfilled all of the conditions for cooperation in a collective sense in keeping with the American President’s thinking.
At the latest upon the consummation of Germany’s disarmament, the world should, for its part, have taken the same step toward establishing equality. It is merely one proof of the accuracy of this view that there was no dearth of admonishing and warning voices in the other peoples and in the other states who endorsed the performance of this duty. I wish to cite only a few of these men-who certainly cannot be referred to as friends of today’s Germany-in order to refute, by their own statements, those who seem to he suffering from amnesia and cannot recall that the Treaty of Versailles contained the contractual obligation not only for Germany to disarm, but for the other states as well."
I am trying to find a link to that individual speech as there is much more that needs to be cited. Stay tuned.
"... those who seem to he suffering from amnesia and cannot recall that the Treaty of Versailles contained the contractual obligation not only for Germany to disarm, but for the other states as well."
From the same speech (somewhat redacted to highlight the essential points)
• Adolf Hitler - speech at the Reichstag - Berlin, May 21, 1935
“When I now proceed from these general remarks to fix my aim more closely on the current problems at hand, I arrive at the following position of the German Reich Government:
1. The German Reich Government rejects the resolution passed in Geneva on April 17. It was not Germany which unilaterally breached the Treaty of Versailles; the Diktat of Versailles was unilaterally breached in regard to the points in question and thus rendered invalid by those very powers which could not bring themselves to follow up the reduction in arms required of Germany by one of their own as had been contractually stipulated.
[…] the German Reich Government considers it necessary to make a sharp distinction between the Treaty of Versailles, which is based upon a division of the nations into victors and vanquished, and the League of Nations, which must be based upon the equal worth and equal rights of all its members.
This equality of rights must be a practicable equality and extend to include all of the functions and property rights comprising international life.
2. As a consequence of the non-performance of the disarmament obligations on the part of the other States, the German Reich Government has, for its part, renounced those articles which, as a consequence of the one-sided burden now placed upon Germany in violation of the Treaty, constitute an indefinite discrimination of the German nation.
3. The German Reich Government does not intend to sign any treaty which it does not feel able to fulfill. It will, however, scrupulously comply with every treaty signed voluntarily, even if same was drawn up prior to its having taken office and coming to power. It will particularly abide by and perform all of the obligations arising from the Locarno Pact as long as the other parties are willing for their part to adhere to this Treaty. The German Reich Government holds that respecting the demilitarized zone constitutes for a sovereign state an enormously important contribution to the appeasement of Europe. It feels bound, however, to point out that the continued increase in troops on the other side can by no means be viewed as a complement to these endeavors.
4. The German Reich Government is willing at all times to participate in a system of collective cooperation with the goal of safeguarding peace in Europe, but feels it would then be necessary to do justice to the law of perpetual evolution by keeping amendments to the treaty in reserve. It feels that a stipulation allowing such an evolution of the treaty would be instrumental in safeguarding peace, while choking off any necessary change would amount to bottling up the ingredients for ensuing explosions.
5. The German Reich Government is of the opinion that the goal of rebuilding European cooperation cannot be achieved by means of foisting conditions upon one side
6. The German Reich Government is basically willing to conclude pacts of non- aggression with its respective neighboring states and to supplement these pacts by all such provisions designed to isolate those who would wage war and to limit the center of war.
7. The German Reich Government is willing to consent to an air pact to supplement the Pact of Locarno and to enter into talks with this aim.
8. The German Reich Government has disclosed the extent to which the new German Wehrmacht will be built up. It will under no circumstances retreat from these parameters. It does not regard the fulfillment of its program on land, in the air or at sea as constituting any threat whatsoever to another nation. It is nonetheless willing at all times to perform those limitations on its armament which are undertaken by the other states as well. The German Reich Government has already announced certain limitations of its own regarding its intentions. It has thus best illustrated its good will to avoid an unlimited arms race. Its limitation on German air armaments at a level of parity with the other respective major western nations makes it possible at any time to fix a maximum figure with which Germany would then also be obliged to comply.
[…]
Germany has neither the intention, the need nor the means to enter into any kind of new naval rivalry.
9. The German Reich Government is willing to take an active part in all endeavors which can lead to a practical limitation of boundless armaments.
10. The German Reich Government is willing to consent to any limitation which leads to the abolishment of those heaviest weapons which are particularly suitable as weapons of attack.
11. Germany declares itself willing to consent to any limitation on the caliber of artillery, battleships, cruisers, and torpedo boats.
[…] Furthermore, it repeats its assurance that it will join any international limitation or ban on arms going into effect concurrently.
12. The German Reich Government is of the opinion that all attempts to effectively ease certain tensions between individual states in the form of international or multilateral agreements must be to no avail until appropriate measures have been taken to prevent irresponsible elements from poisoning the public opinion of the peoples by the written and spoken word and in movies and the theater.
13. The German Reich Government is willing at all times to consent to an international agreement which, by effective means, serves to prohibit and render impossible all attempts by third parties to interfere in other states. It must, however, demand that such a settlement go into force on an international scale and equally benefit all states
[…] The peoples want peace. The governments must be able to maintain it! I believe that the restoration of German military power will become a factor in this peace-not because we plan to increase this power to some pointless magnitude, but because the simple fact of its existence does away with a dangerous vacuum in Europe. Germany does not intend to increase its armaments to an infinite degree. We do not have 10,000 bombers and we will not build 10,000 bombers; on the contrary: we have imposed upon ourselves the limitation which guarantees, in our opinion, the protection of the nation without violating the concept of the possibility of a collective security and a respective agreement. We would be most pleased were such an agreement to afford us the opportunity to make use of the diligence of our Volk for production processes more beneficial than those of manufacturing instruments for the destruction of human life and values.
[...]
May other peoples also succeed in putting into bold words the true yearning of their innermost depths. He who would brandish the torch of war in Europe can desire nothing but chaos. We, however, live in the firm conviction that our age will witness not the decline of the West, but its resurrection. That Germany may furnish an immortal contribution to this great work is our proud hope and our unshakeable belief.
Article 12 is particularly significant: "12. The German Reich Government is of the opinion that all attempts to effectively ease certain tensions between individual states in the form of international or multilateral agreements must be to no avail until appropriate measures have been taken to prevent irresponsible elements from poisoning the public opinion of the peoples by the written and spoken word and in movies and the theater."
World Wars come from Word Wars.
Alerted with Astute and Acute Awareness. :-)
This is in reply to your excellent quotes. There's a YT commenter, Von Crowne, who wrote, "Conjuring Hitler. It's a fine book, but you're no where near to the end of your journey. I could give you the short cut, but nobody accepts it that hasn't put in the work. You've fallen into a nest of guardians, whose aim is to steer you away from the truth. Check out Miles Mathis and Simon Shack, and know it's another trap, but nearer the truth. Good luck. It's a Mystery worthy of Kings."
I replied, "Thanks for the recommendations, Von Crowne. There are a couple of my readers who've put far more work into this than I have. The two of them don't agree. One sees Hitler as having acted with honor throughout, towards Germans and Jews. The other, who reposts some of Firestarter's work, sees Hitler as an agent of Londonium and the Rothschilds along with being a Rothschild. And I thought that was also what Mathis comes to, but it's been awhile since I read him. I haven't read Simon Shack.
"I tend to agree with the latter perspective. I only read the prologue to Conjuring Hitler but, as an economist, Guido seemed mired in the debt-money paradigm. Feder's system doesn't go as far as mine but if Germany had repudiated the bankers, and replaced it with a sovereign currency, they didn't need British funding. Did Hitler need it to win and betray the National Socialists and German people? Likely.
"Kate is right though, that my Substack gets deep conversations going. If you want to test your theories on this mystery with others who have done the work (and I agree that I'm not one of them) you should post your thoughts there."
Having read these quotes though, I'm reversing my position again. This is brilliant and honest statescraft. No agent of the Rothschilds would craft these words. I think what you're doing is important--it's not just reading what people wrote about Hitler, it's also reading him directly. Like Putin, his words speak for themselves.
You are so very, very kind Tereza. It is just my journey. I had no idea I would be reading that when trying to understand Putin and Russia (and hence the world) present and past.
Speaking of reading their words directly - oh my, you have just issued me a challenge to Book Mention (that's now a verb!) "The Governance of China" by Xi Jinping. I haven't read the four volumes from cover to cover but what I have read will astound our readers. But I have to finish what I am working on and then another. I will keep it churning over.
You are a walking (if fingers can be said to ...) diplomatic ambassador to the world, past, present and future. IMAGINE if diplomacy and foreign relations were real things! I look forward to Xi and whatever projects are in the interim.
You have inspired this haiku ...
---------
• Alive and Awake
• Armed with Altered Awareness
• Acutely Astute
hola, tereza. really superb essay today. great and broad and engaging discussion.
i think you are right about the last word nature of jasun's stance and adroitly pointed out that similarity with the paywalled nature of his stack.
i don't think running away from language is any more productive to our existence here than is becoming a hermit. in a way it is a kind of adolescent immature _reaction_ to not accepting life as it is. a kind of by-pass i'm seeing more and more clearly as a key part of our character: stay young by by-passing our personal responsibility to own our power, and a key part of that is appropriate use of words. the ptb have been masters of using words, inappropriately. a huge part of that has been to teach us we are powerless and to bow to their abuse of language as creating falsehood and confusion. the silent monastery in spain is not the solution. gautama said the same thing, and even had a kind of youthful rebellion at his monastery when someone tried to splinter his students by leading a hermitic revolt. (it failed.) no, guatama insisted that being in the world as it is is the key to transforming the world.
so much more i could write. i will stop here as i go back to my own essay which is due tomorrow.
and thank you for mentioning me and the _lord of the flies_ essay! that was unexpected and a very interesting connection you made between your topic of language and its various purposes including schismogenesis — which the book _lord of the rings_ created in me and, as you commented, in you and other people who also commented on my essay.
great effort here! thank you.
how appropriate that you would be my first comment here, Guy. I wasn't trying to pull a sleazy NLP mirroring technique on you with that lower-case letter, my pinky just slipped off the shift ;-) I was eagerly anticipating your thoughts. I'm glad that it resonated with you. Having your Lord of the Flies essay come up with my Hitler Journey was a nice reminder of how long and in how many different forms our dialogue has been going on. Looking forward to your next installment!
Hi Tereza, Thank you for this! Do you have more expanded insights on Autism? I'm looking through your articles as time allows and I really enjoy and appreciate your point of view. If not, would you kindly point me in the direction of some that you like or have helped you understand the Autism phenomenon? Thanks again. 🌷
I'm afraid I don't really have any resources, Heather. I'm making up theories from the top of my head (others may suggest other anatomy). It's just been my observations. My oldest daughter worked with autistic men for a brief time and it's her theory that almost all men are somewhere on the spectrum. But one of her best friends is a woman who also misses those social cues. My daughter has been training her for almost 20 years in how to have a conversation, and listen to the other person. I'm sure I'm getting much wrong at the extreme ends, I just mean the more common, even ubiquitous, part of the spectrum.
So glad you brought this up Heather. My 18 yr old son is autistic. He was born 3 months premature. At the time, I had zero clue what the medical industrial complex was doing all these years, to poison the population. The first Vax they gave him was Dtap, not sized to the body weight of a premature baby. He only weighed 2 lbs.
Every time I think of this, it pisses me off. He could have developed normal.
In Japan, there's a law strictly enforced that babies cannot be vaccinated until they are past 2yrs old. Their SIDs rate is next to zero; their autism rate is comparable to the Omish.
Autism is a feature rather than a side effect. You can probably guess ---- after I have gone through as much as I have since his birth, there shall be no further vaccines in my family.
I'm humbled to be part of this conversation between you and Heather. What a heavy experience to go through as a parent. And such hard-won knowledge. It makes my heart ache, the things that didn't need to happen. I'm honored that I can add any shape and meaning. Heather, the archetypes of the heroine's journey seems so apt. There is a major tipping of the balance that feels like it's happening now. I'm glad that the mystical seems practical and love that image of adding a warrior ring to your braid. Blessings to you both.
I had another thought I wanted to add. I often thought, when I was a hospice volunteer, how I could survive if one (or more) of my children died. Here's the only belief I ever thought might enable that: this child needed to be in the world with the exact lifespan they would have. Somewhere, before they were born, I was given a choice: this exact child for this many years or any other child for a normal lifespan. No matter what, I would always choose that child for as many years as I could get.
Maybe your children needed to be in the world exactly as they are. To develop normally was never an option. But somewhere there was a cosmic choice of whether that child would be born to you or to some other parents. You had the strength and the love to choose this child over any other. You knew that you could provide what this child needs. And this child would provide you with the special insight you needed to make sense of the world. It is a hero[ine]'s journey.
Very profound and very true. In the physical sense, there is Being, Consciousness, and Bliss----- or....
Existence--- Awareness--- Fulfillment.
All this rests within Balance:
There is Kala -- Time in the true sense.
There is Kali -- Action in the true sense. Time doesn't exist in a sequential way, we are experiencing it that way, as our sense of Reality. Reality is subjective to the Individuated Self but Reality is not Truth.
When I learned what the "I" really is and the sense of "I am that I am," it was through the Heart, not Mind. When we come here, all we ever want to do is get back to where we came from, the Eternity of Oneness. Because it is Pure Love. Life is not opposite of Death, yet due to the human nature, we become induced to see it as opposites. We really don't exist as separate beings We are Being -- Itself.
I hope what I say here helps 🙏 No matter what the difficulty, I will stand with Life and Being. Having buried a few people who were close to me, I realize they are Never gone. All is One.
Hi there, I really appreciate your candor. I experience a very similar situation to yours, and I definitely lean way toward the vaccination-injury as causation. I also know that certain genetic traits passed down from both sides have contributed to the severity of the condition. This is, in my humble opinion, why not everyone with Autism has the same deficits in each domain. I have many more suspicions, of course, and I've been reluctant to express them publicly, mainly because of the "preaching to the choir" aspect of it. And the sheer mental and emotional exhaustion of it all.
Also, I must confess that I am no longer angry about it. One of the reasons I enjoy Tereza so much is because her articles have inspired me to pick my imagination back up again when contemplating my own "Heroine's Journey." It really helps to have a mystical point of view, rather than a solely materialistic one. For a while there, I forgot about the many archetypal facets of this life I have chosen. Lately, I've taken to letting go a little better and focusing on what works one day at a time. There are still major hiccups --and Big pHarma looms -- but on a Hero's Journey, each small win is like adding a warrior ring to my braid. Blessings and Healing to you and your miraculous son. 🌷
Wholeheartedly appreciated, Heather; the Mystical perspective is indeed most important. It's the Spiritual that keeps life clear and beautiful. Blessings to you.🙏
There's just so much here.
"The Matrix has it backwards. We’re in an illusion of pain and death, suffering and danger, but reality is an ever-expanding collidescope (sic) of delight and imagination." I love this, and fully agree. On the subject of imagination, I have considered often that the inability of so many to recognize the pysop that was Covid (which seen, opens us to up to the mechanism and ubiquity) came down to a lack of imagination.
Those guardrails installed in our minds through so many stories and steering, has kept us on the normie road, and for many, going beyond and being targeted as a 'conspiracy theorist' seems a stigma too far. We pay a price for wanting to belong to the world, even when that world is driving over a clif.
The mystery of 'mother' in its deepest, womb-like sense, is under obvious assault. What are we to make of a world where the greatest mysteries, and the greatest expression of love and creation are pushed aside? Yes, the Matrix would have you think taking the red pill leads to a cold, isolated world of ongoing attack and paranoia. It's the opposite, it's a return to sanity and the every day miracle of life.
This is the shadow side of red-pillers - nothing but dark hollows in which we can get lost at best, or meet our end at worse.
Red pilling is shedding illusion, in its light-side, and opening us back up to grounded reality, it's seeing through the illusion to return us back to life itself, as it is. You don't get any closer than a mother who cares for her child. A world where Nature again sits center in respect and awe and mundanity.
I'll have to read through again. As I said, so much here. Thanks, as always, Tereza for igniting thought, imagination and question. Best.
This is not relevant to your comment, Kathleen, but I wanted to put it somewhere. I'm at BWI and coming out of the bathrooms are wall sized murals titled 'Jet Streams over Rooftops.' They're very clear, crisscrossed geoengineered trails, some of them spiraling out the way that only magnets on nano-aluminum can produce. Normalizing?
And now the entire boarding area, minus me, has been standing at the windows with their hands over their heart, as instructed, while the coffin of a military member who died in the course of duty is loaded. They've been standing for 10 minutes, taking photos. How has it come to this? They may change my boarding position from A to Z.
Kathleen, you really do complete my sentences. I won't have time to respond as fully as I'd like, since my plane boards in a bit, but I read what I wrote, reflected by you, and am astonished that you brought it to a deeper place (as did Tonika and Mary). The mystery of mother, yes! The red pill of paranoia, no! The red pill of shedding illusion and getting back to a mother caring for her child, yes! yes! yes!
lol.
I am not quite halfway through the interview.
Appreciating Peter's framing: What Does Technology Want - which leads to the question: Is there some sort of external force behind this technological drive? (Yes) Jasun affirms this idea that there is an external force adding the proviso that it must have gotten inside us.
Bingo. (I don't expect we'll agree here, Tereza, but maybe some crossovers)
This was so gratifying to hear. Not because it's a pleasant, but because I think it's right- the broad strokes of it at any rate. Not claiming to understand the details by any means.
But infiltration - on multiple levels, yes.
I don't like 'Satan' as descriptor though, for several reasons, mostly it casts us back into a pre-made mold that we've already begun to dislodge ourselves from, so, I'll pass.
More significantly I don't actually think this non-human element - which has been a cosmic sized wrench in the works - is organic or natural. It copies and replicates. It's AI-like. (Hence the transhuman AI like world it seeks to use us to create.)
It's been here a long time. It has already messed with our biology.
It can get in and take over to varying degrees, so very parasitical. (Has a lot to do with frequency resonance of the host. If your frequency is in a bandwidth that is outside its reach, it can't penetrate.)
Largely non-physical, operating interdimensionally as energy thought-forms that need hosts to live and feed off of. (Not really hard to imagine. Propaganda is a mind-virus of sorts, once 'entered' and accepted we have a tendency to propagate it ourselves, repeat it over and over, as in 'safe and effective.' This is an example of 'take-over'.
It isn't a human who went 'bad' and used their freewill to do bad things.
Surely this is what it wants us to think; that these are human attributes and drives.
It's not from the same Source as humans. (Though perhaps there is an ultimately unifying context in which even this is integrated; this too just being part of the dream of separation. I like to think so.)
It would like us to accept its attributes as aspects of humanity. Take them on and identify with them. Wants us to believe that we are forever struggling with demons and our own evil impulses are expressed in things like forever wars and greed. Setting us up to forever require an external 'God' to forgive us, redeem us and of course, in this model, we learn our only recourse as sinners is pray, obey and pay.
What a scam.
This is not the case. This is the con.
Humans are far more elevated than that. We have our own sovereignty, our own connection to Source and don't need to be 'herded' by anyone or anything.
We are on the cusp of this slave-system technology breaking up, and so we will be breaking out. What humanity really is, freed, will again take root - here on our planet, our home - aligned with the Natural world set-up and guided by Universal Law.
I'll just add that we don't have to fear this parasitical non-human force - we are far more impressive than it. Far. More. Impressive. (It works really hard at containing us.)
We do have to discern its presence, recognize where it shows up (everywhere) to limit us and our innate abilities, our self-referencing freedom. We do have to choose not to go along with it.
'No' is our greatest weapon.
It has gotten really far. Yet it ultimately fails.
This is what's happening, imo. A deep shaking off of the invisible (and now visible) shackles we were born into.
It's an amazing time.
I'm so glad we can have this conversation, Kathleen. I feel that it's like Julius and Nefahotep figuring out what Hitler really was. They both agree that he isn't what we're told and keep adding new information where I go back and forth, unable to reach any conclusion with certainty. What we know is that it's an important portion of the puzzle.
Like them, you and I agree that the Bible isn't what we're told it is. My last piece on it dissected it at the literal level and also at the mythos level as a depiction of God. The next level is maybe Biglio's, that neutral observers were making sense of otherworldly being and phenomenon (still need to watch, I may have that wrong.)
The third paradigm might be that worldly rulers invented a pseudo-mythos to convince us they're gods and otherworldly beings, destined to rule.
Maybe a fourth paradigm is that it's a psychoanalysis of our dream of guilt, shame, fear and blame. It shows us what we need to forgive in ourselves.
A fifth paradigm is that it's a coded military-psyop strategy in which they're required to warn us so that, if we don't figure it out, we're a willing sacrifice.
And a sixth is that it's a puzzle to be deciphered from the spirit that wants us to wake up and create the benevolent 'reality' that's one step from Reality.
All but the first could be true at the same time. I really like your parasitic interdimensional non-human energy form that requires a certain frequency to be receptive. All of the degradation of our physical and mental capacities, the toxicity of our food and environment, make us vulnerable. But it's not human or human nature.
You've answered my question of how do we write this into the script so it's a happy ending. Maybe the 'waking up' can be almost instantaneous for human=kind. That's something I'll give deep consideration.
I love the way you think Tereza!
And I genuinely believe that even as we suss through so much confusion and pysops and various, obvious attacks on humans, somewhere and somehow - that we can still access - nothing happened.
How can these two things be true at once?
It must have something to do with our multidimensional selves and the role of time and space, maybe part of the game of hide and seek... But IDK.
Yes, I'm so glad we can have these conversations!
Oh that's a really deep hypothesis. And completely fits my concept of the dream / hallucination. "Forgive them all because ... nothing happened." Wow!
I was also moved by the above passage for the reasons Kathleen mentions. Perhaps it’s my own priors that lead me to agree with it. I was especially provoked by the passage that followed about how god would love his children at least as much as I, as a mother, would. It’s interesting how much gets twisted in dogma. As if it the main purpose was control to begin with.
I would need to watch the relevant podcast to comment further on its interesting points. And although this isn’t quite about the topic, I thought I’d mention a strange discovery: I saw a video (no longer can I find it online) of Peter Duke, George Webb and Mark Kulacz casually talking around a table. It was frim 2019. I had no idea any of them knew each other prior to covid. It struck me as strange; I assumed they all met after the plandemonium. It makes me wonder if there is a network of alternative media personalities that work together in some fashion. Just mentioning and not insinuating nefarios intentions.
That is interesting! I can't do the livestream lifestyle but I get Mark's notices. He's installing his cement steps at the same time as me, I left them pouring a walkway while I drove to the airport. But that is curious that they all knew each other before and were podcasting pre-CovidCon.
So well said, Kathleen. I'll add that my hypno-hubby often explains to new clients that the phrase, "It's only your imagination!" has been used to disengage us from our greatest power: the power of creation.
Tereza, I can't help but laugh at the absurdity of piling on technology to do the simplest of things: returning to (literally) Mother Nature. Hmm...I feel a post coming on...
So many great observations and thought connections as usual, Tereza. Your point about the Metaverse particularly resonates this morning as I just wrote a piece last night about the Apple Vision Pro (or rather, mostly shared a brilliant one that somebody else wrote and elaborated upon that), another way to take away our humanity. And your phrase “the disenwombed”… A friend of mine (the one I was staying with over Xmas when I was going for walks and listening to you a lot) was advised to have a hysterectomy to treat other health issues. I saw her this weekend and she told me she feels empty and lost, that she doesn’t know who she is anymore. 😔
Yes, I read your wonderful article but have been flying between land and sky ;-) The photo was heartbreaking, everything they're telling us real life is that we have to escape. I even read some crap--and this was awhile ago--that we needed to provide equity in access to digital escapes so that people with less ability to be in nice places in real life weren't deprived. It's another slick bait-and-switch using our compassion against us.
Oh I feel so bad for your friend. I hope that we imagine this new world into existence soon because the womb-man is a state of mind, one that men would do well to provide for others, not retreat into. The maternal is something I'd like to see us become as a society. It isn't just that technology is replacing the Big Mother, but we're also being reduced to permanent infantilism. We're not thinking like parents of the next generation, whether or not we are individually.
💗
Thank you for linking my post, Tereza! Words and their meanings and how language changes and morphs over time is a fascinating topic that I wish I had more time to explore. I love to make up new ones, thus UnPsyOppable... your posts are always thought provoking!
I only worry that, for me, UnPsyOppable would call down the imps of fate to laugh at me, the next time I figure one out that I'm totally oblivious to now!
😂
My notes: https://readwise.io/reader/shared/01hqs5s05d22rvqxy54d3rvc18
Thanks for annotating that with the misattributions corrected, Peter. I particularly like this one, "A "universal quantifier" is a form of distortion. The cognitive dissonance/momentary trance state can be triggered by any question that reveals a discrepancy between a perception and a new-found reality. The patterns are doors.."
And this one: "This was Bateson's colleague Robert Dilts, who coined "sleight-of-mouth" to the 14 responses to a cause-effect/complex equivalence linguistic pattern. An example here: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/app/post/edit/1751745." Great phrase, sleight of mouth. And even though it's not 14 Retorts to Anything, someone should write that.
I think that primarily I kept assuming your sources said those well-phrased clever things, rather than you. Happy to be corrected!
And now, from your kind invitation, I'm in a quandary. I'd love to hear George's reaction to the Jill quote and compare some notes on Malone. Yet I'm compiling a whole list in my head of things I'd like to talk about with you. I think I'd like to do the one-on-one talk to be able to go deeper, and I'm sure my path will cross with George another time. Thank you again for that generous response!
https://www.abbyeagle.com/images/nlp-meta-model-600W.png
https://thedukereport.com/books/the-users-guide-to-sleight-of-mouth-how-to-unleash-the-magic-of-language-to-persuade-anyone-anytime-anywhere/
Oh nose...one of the Horsemen won't be going to Belgium anymore? Well, they do have some dynamite ales there, so maybe book me a plane ride to one of the few places on the planet where there's a vanishingly small chance of encountering the dude. This next one's for him...and for you, since you seem to like brass musical instruments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkVLRsMdBMo
Same song, but better electrocution (promo code: Norm Crosby). Is there a way to persuade Mike Yeadon & Phil Lesh to compare family trees? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rwSelzaH-8
I like your priorities--good ale, no whiny whinnying Lusitano man.
Can we rename him El Caballo de la Lusitania (one of the current era's suspected false flags)? Meanwhile, perhaps she's not so stable, but I'll take a dose of optimism where I can find it, even at a Clinton inauguration event... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHPPYT9dj9g
OK, last equine themed number w/ brass... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFEdtKoG8zw