Hellstorm, what a documentary... had this been taught to students, we could have been living in a better world.
From the name of the Hamburg carpet bombing operation... you can tell who ordered it
Another indicator of who the perpetrators were at 27:14:
in the farmyard further down the road stood a card to which four naked women were "nailed through their hands in a cruciform" position. Beyond stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was "nailed through the hands in a crucified" posture
Spelled out at 29:52: Ilya Ehrenburg & 31:52
The fact that Soviet and US/UK had identical genocidal behavior, is further indication that they had the same masters
So many excellent points, Fadi. It's not only that we're missing the lesson of the economic system that worked, we're not internalizing the lesson of the horrors that happened.
And yes, no matter how ruthless and cruel Christian tormentors could be--and we have the Inquisition and colonization to prove they were--they would never imitate the crucifixion. I just misspelled this cruxi-fiction and that seemed significant. It's the crux of how a god who requires human blood sacrifice morphed from the Torah to the gospels.
Sorrow for what happened but I have hope because it is now being revealed.
true... truth is coming out like never before.... but from 0.1% to 2% is a 2000% increase... but still a far cry from having a meaningful impact on the narrative. Nevertheless, it is always meaningful for truth seekers to discover more truths
I haven't watched the video yet, but a few thoughts occurred to me reading your summary points.
First, as you know, I've been reading David Irving's "Hitler's War" and I'm about 1/4 the way through, just got to the part about operation "Yellow" (the attack on France). I'm admittedly very ignorant on this subject, which is why I'm reading this book. But as far as I can tell, it seems unlikely that Hitler was anybody's agent but his own. He expressed his fondness for England many times before Yellow, and kept resisting attacking that nation. He apparently thought that England was on his side in the quest for racial purity. But the final straw for him was Churchill's order to attack the French fleet at north Africa, killing over a thousand French sailors and injuring hundreds more. At that point, he realized England's true purpose.
Hitler also said that he had no interest in taking over England's colonial empire -- Germany had no ability to manage something that big.
I'm very impressed you're reading Hitler's War, Mark, both for the emotionally difficult content and the comprehensive research.
For the sake of argument, aka productive disagreement, let's explore the possibility. Hitler went to school in England and his portrait was taken on the bridge by the school for Theosophy, I think it was. Let's say he was groomed for this role. He would have fondness for England either way.
I think that Churchill's attack on the French fleet revealed the true purpose of the Jewish financiers who'd paid Churchill's debts so he didn't lose his mansion ... not England's. And it's interesting that Hitler would have so much regard for French sailors that the attack on them would have such an impact.
I've read that French factory workers held reunions with the Germans who they worked for, relations were so good. And I just read this article, which was jarring: https://www.unz.com/article/high-treason-and-collaboration-in-europe/. After Germany had won in France, conditions were so amicable that romantic relationships and business relationships formed. When that reversed, the French who'd fraternized were killed as collaborators. So losing to Germany was far better than being 'freed' by the Allies.
That was a wonderful conversation between Sigmar and yourself, Tereza. I don’t accept credit for ‘instigating’ it, however. Maybe it was an indirect mention. Or maybe it is the Appalachian in both of you.
I first came across Sigmar Academy through his interview with Zach Kidd (‘LogosRevealed’) and was particularly impressed with his considerable array of “Book Studies” early on his YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/@SigmarAcademy/videos
You have already summarised the key points and I particularly liked your closing statement at 58:00: “If I don’t want anyone to rule over me then I need to let go of my desire to rule over anyone else.”
You and Sigmar clearly have such different backgrounds but both brought great perspectives, and I so appreciated the respectfully positive disagreements.
Loved your journey of awakening via 911. Mine only began over 15 years later following the Russian involvement in Syria.
For me, the other major trigger points were as follows:
__________
49:20 – Sigmar: “what does it mean to be heroic?”
I have yet to read it all but in Thomas Carlyle’s “Heroes and Hero Worship” - “Chapter 5 - Hero as Man of Letters” – you find this nugget
“In Books lies the soul of the whole Past Time.“
__________
52:40 – Sigmar: ”doing the right thing should always be your primary objective”
“The fate of man is, in his life on earth, to confront the outbreak of uninvited evil. It is impossible to avoid this fate; and thus there are only two possibilities: either to be dishonourable and turn away from this struggle, to dishonourably live through it by both blindness and cowardice, or the honourable path of accepting it, comprehending this acceptance as a service and remaining faithful to its vocation.“
Ivan Ilyin - “On Resistance to Evil by Force” (Chapter 21)
(I tend to agree with Sigmar that there are people that are inherently evil – and that they will congregate within the ‘system’ (or ideology) that accommodates their evilness.)
__________
54:08 – Tereza: ”we don’t need colonies – what we need is control over our own labour"
Reference: “Fascism:100 Questions Asked and Answered” by Sir Oswald Mosley. In particular, Mosley’s answers to::
42. If you are going to exclude foreign imports, will you not damage British export trade ?
43. What will be the effect of excluding imports upon the people who hold foreign investments?
Again, wonderful conversation – educational and inspiring.
'Respectfully positive disagreements' is a great way to put it. I also felt good about that.
You may have noticed that I pulled you into the fray over the 'boomer truth narrative.' I'm surrounded by far too many clueless millennials to throw my generation under the bus. And I'm only guessing we're the same generation from your sweet story about taking the grandkids to tea. So while 911 was the beginning of my WTF awakening, you've been making up for those lost 15 yrs at 4X speed!
However, I do think there's a correlation. The holocaust narrative couldn't be promoted when there were lots of veterans around who knew the truth. It was the 1960's it was launched, full steam ahead, by Hollywood. I think that was in reaction to Benjamin Freedman's speech in 1961. So my generation got the full brunt of that through our formative years. It wasn't 1945 when that changed but 1961. Even when I was in school, the first association with 'holocaust' was 'nuclear.'
You and Sigmar are welcome to believe there are inherently evil people but, if inherent, who made them that way? For Sigmar, it could be a Norse pagan god, and we know how temperamental they can be. But if a creator God made them evil, then God is evil. Yes? Argue your way out of that, my friend!
Hey, Orcas get all the credit but I counted just as many humans huddling around. And I'm sure many of them were making encouraging vocalizations.
And from what I gathered from the narrator, Orcas are all inherently evil and this pod has been feminized by its domi-matrix. As a matter of fact, I think these are little pansy Orcas (said in a sing-song particular to playgrounds).
I really appreciate you listening, jacquelyn. I debated it, knowing that we disagreed in some significant ways. For one, I revel in the mixing of cultures, which I consider the best of the US. I'd just gotten out of my Worldanz class where we did Bollywood, Senegalese, Jamaican dance hall, samba and Michael Jackson. My dance teacher is as degenerate as possible, which is the only reason we put up with her insanely strenuous workout. She makes us laugh. But I suspect Sigmar would be okay with that too.
Sigmar and I both come from Appalachia, and I've often thought my hometown gives the lie to white privilege. We're planning another interview specifically on the rape of Appalachia, a history that goes back to Alexander Hamilton. Especially with Mr. Hillbilly Elegy a heartbeat away from the Oval Office, it's another lie that needs to be exposed.
Yet it's occurred to me that this movement parallels, in many ways, the ideology of the Torah. They're both against intermarriage or assimilation into other cultures. They don't want children of mixed blood. There's a belief that anything you do for 'your people' is good. They emphasize hierarchy and ancestral religion.
I was glad to hear that Sigmar didn't think there should be empires over foreign colonies, but that each country should be ruled by their own. However, I think Appalachia was turned into an internal labor-and-resource colony. I don't think being ruled by white men turned out very well for us.
Thanks again! It's lovely to think of you listening to me!
I finally got around to watching the video. I’m grateful that these conversations are being had because, just like you mentioned in the podcast, I am one of the people that woke up after the covidcon and now promptly think if they lied about that, what else have they been lying about.
And, my woo woo friend, I’m also not convinced we’re individuals but more like drops that all comes from the same ocean.
Thanks for that reference, Julius! That was a great article, along with his other links.
And I'm a deep thinker but a slow one--I was often formulating a response to Sigmar's last question while he was asking a new one. That's my only excuse for forgetting about Ron Unz during the interview, which I hope to have made up here.
“Anti-Semitism – like racism – is a spiritual and moral malady that sickens societies and kills people with lethalities comparable to history’s most deadly plagues,” wrote Kennedy in an announcement on Monday evening, adding:
'In recent years, the censorship and false narratives of woke cancel culture have transformed our great universities into greenhouses for this deadly and virulent pestilence. Making America healthy means building communities of trust and mutual respect, based on speech freedom and open debate.'
"Kennedy then linked to a press release announcing a joint-effort by the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the General Services Administration to “end anti-semitic harassment on college campuses,” beginning with a “comprehensive review of Columbia University’s federal contracts and grants in light of ongoing investigations for potential violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.”
The logic of this is so confused that I don't think there can be any doubt that Kennedy never had any intention of doing good, but has been part of the con from the get-go.
Anti-semitism kills people with the lethality of history's most deadly plagues? How does that work exactly? And woke cancel culture's censorship and false narratives (can't even tell what that means) has created a greenhouse for this pestilence? Combating anti-semitism is now a function of providing health services? Building communities of speech freedom and open debate means cracking down on free speech and debate regarding Israel? That's so Orwellian I don't have words, other than the recognition that Kennedy isn't this stupid. Which means he's complicit and always has been.
My policy, Gunther, is that I don't allow anyone to be insulted on my stack, as individuals or groups, including myself. However I allow all ideas to be freely challenged. If you have specific examples of where David Irving is wrong as a historian, please provide them. But character attacks don't count as an argument, nor does citing another person as an authority without quoting what they've said that proves your point.
Well, go ask Dave Cole! He´s got a stack just like you. Now, "specific examples of where David Irving is wrong as a historian?". Being wrong "as a historian" is not the basis for which I call him an IDIOT. His IDIOTIC behavior in public, very well documented and notorious, is what makes him an idiot.
"go ask Dave Cole" is what I call the rhetorical fallacy of 'throwing the book at it.' You made the statement that he's an idiot but I need to go do the research to prove your point to myself. If you've read Dave Cole and he's given examples showing David Irving is an idiot, cite them. Otherwise, don't throw around unsubstantiated insults.
Dave Cole, looking back at his own notorious career AS A YOUNG MAN, could not imagine having repeated his foolish choices AS AN OLD MAN - as is David Irving obviously, in this dated video. This is why I call David Irving an idiot. Perhaps Dave Cole would have told you as much. Perhaps not.
Now, I don´t know anything about your background, as you know nothing about mine, but I suspect that unlike myself, now 62 years old, you did NOT grow up around all this history, surrounded by it in the form of elderly and not so elderly friends and relatives, and that you, like all my little American friends growing up in America in the 60's and 70's, were more interested in music and sports and movies and television.
You're absolutely right that you know nothing about my background. But I don't make assumptions about yours. I will tell my daughter your suspicion that 'like all your little American friends' I grew up more interested in music and sports and movies and television. It will give her a good laugh.
I haven't yet watched but I'll post the top comments in reply to it:
"This isn't an interview, it boils my blood to see this reporter asking a question and not giving a chance for Mr. David to answer let alone listening to what he says. Shame on you BBC" 70 likes
"I'm so impressed by how calm and polite Irving remains. I've always bought the popular narrative, but now I see that everything he says adds up." 219 likes
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,” God blessed David Irving with reasoning. 1000 likes
"He is so articulate and gentlemanly in his approach to defending himself. Quite a remarkable man and one with whom I uphold the greatest amount of respect." 41 likes
"If the truth is self-evident why does it need to be protected by law?" 3400 likes
"Its a fundamental right to question events. Any country that jails someone for their opinion and makes free speech illegal must be condemned." 41 likes
"What a man!!! Thank you for exposing the Evil Lies" 157 likes
"This is the craziest rabbit hole I’ve ever gone down. What an incredible man." 357 likes
"One thing I learned from this is how the media cleverly cherry picks phrases out of context to smear your character, discredit and break and demolish your credibility" 211 likes
"The honesty of the man in spite of being harassed by a biased interviewer is clear to anyone. Disgusting lack of journalism from BBC." 370 likes
"Anyone advocating 100% truth based on his honest conviction has no reason to fear open debate. If you imprison someone dissenting from a generally accepted but untested/undebated theory, you may well be imprisoning the truth, thus precluding advances in civilisation. Judging from the lecture he gave on YouTube, he is an extremely well-learned man on the subject he talked about with impeccable scholastic conscience and incredible powers of memory." 41 likes
"There's a strange similarity with this journalist and piers morgan, interrupting attacking the guest. Whether right or wrong let the guest talk and let the viewer hear them, whether right or wrong. it's called respect" 471 likes
"One thing is for certain. That is the best I've ever seen someone handle being on the hot seat and not becoming unglued. Irving was professional and reserved, however he matched this incredibly hard interviewer who hammered him for all 24 minutes relentlessly, word for word and gave back just as hard as he got without ever losing his cool." 499 likes
"Thank you David for all your work over the years it’s amazing how they get away with there lies even when presented with facts" 20 likes
"One of the finest historians ever, and his life was ruined for writing the truth. Tells you a lot about western democracies." 16 likes
"When someone not only forbids you to question a past event but makes it illegal and threatens you with a costly lawsuit and imprisonment, you have to ask yourself what is being hidden." 1100 likes
"This interview was the last time the BBC dared to give Irving a hearing. He proved so popular and ignited so much interest they would never risk it now." 645 likes
"The blatent hostility of this reporter is remarkable." 918 likes
"maybe they call the show "hardtalk" because of how hard it is to talk when you get interrupted midway through every sentence" 13 likes
There are many more comments but I haven't found a positive one yet.
Hellstorm, what a documentary... had this been taught to students, we could have been living in a better world.
From the name of the Hamburg carpet bombing operation... you can tell who ordered it
Another indicator of who the perpetrators were at 27:14:
in the farmyard further down the road stood a card to which four naked women were "nailed through their hands in a cruciform" position. Beyond stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was "nailed through the hands in a crucified" posture
Spelled out at 29:52: Ilya Ehrenburg & 31:52
The fact that Soviet and US/UK had identical genocidal behavior, is further indication that they had the same masters
So many excellent points, Fadi. It's not only that we're missing the lesson of the economic system that worked, we're not internalizing the lesson of the horrors that happened.
And yes, no matter how ruthless and cruel Christian tormentors could be--and we have the Inquisition and colonization to prove they were--they would never imitate the crucifixion. I just misspelled this cruxi-fiction and that seemed significant. It's the crux of how a god who requires human blood sacrifice morphed from the Torah to the gospels.
Sorrow for what happened but I have hope because it is now being revealed.
"cruxi-fiction" lol lovely!
"I have hope because it is now being revealed"
true... truth is coming out like never before.... but from 0.1% to 2% is a 2000% increase... but still a far cry from having a meaningful impact on the narrative. Nevertheless, it is always meaningful for truth seekers to discover more truths
I haven't watched the video yet, but a few thoughts occurred to me reading your summary points.
First, as you know, I've been reading David Irving's "Hitler's War" and I'm about 1/4 the way through, just got to the part about operation "Yellow" (the attack on France). I'm admittedly very ignorant on this subject, which is why I'm reading this book. But as far as I can tell, it seems unlikely that Hitler was anybody's agent but his own. He expressed his fondness for England many times before Yellow, and kept resisting attacking that nation. He apparently thought that England was on his side in the quest for racial purity. But the final straw for him was Churchill's order to attack the French fleet at north Africa, killing over a thousand French sailors and injuring hundreds more. At that point, he realized England's true purpose.
Hitler also said that he had no interest in taking over England's colonial empire -- Germany had no ability to manage something that big.
I'm very impressed you're reading Hitler's War, Mark, both for the emotionally difficult content and the comprehensive research.
For the sake of argument, aka productive disagreement, let's explore the possibility. Hitler went to school in England and his portrait was taken on the bridge by the school for Theosophy, I think it was. Let's say he was groomed for this role. He would have fondness for England either way.
I think that Churchill's attack on the French fleet revealed the true purpose of the Jewish financiers who'd paid Churchill's debts so he didn't lose his mansion ... not England's. And it's interesting that Hitler would have so much regard for French sailors that the attack on them would have such an impact.
I've read that French factory workers held reunions with the Germans who they worked for, relations were so good. And I just read this article, which was jarring: https://www.unz.com/article/high-treason-and-collaboration-in-europe/. After Germany had won in France, conditions were so amicable that romantic relationships and business relationships formed. When that reversed, the French who'd fraternized were killed as collaborators. So losing to Germany was far better than being 'freed' by the Allies.
That's pretty interesting about Hitler's early years. I should look into that at some point. Another rabbit hole, yay!
That was a wonderful conversation between Sigmar and yourself, Tereza. I don’t accept credit for ‘instigating’ it, however. Maybe it was an indirect mention. Or maybe it is the Appalachian in both of you.
I first came across Sigmar Academy through his interview with Zach Kidd (‘LogosRevealed’) and was particularly impressed with his considerable array of “Book Studies” early on his YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/@SigmarAcademy/videos
You have already summarised the key points and I particularly liked your closing statement at 58:00: “If I don’t want anyone to rule over me then I need to let go of my desire to rule over anyone else.”
You and Sigmar clearly have such different backgrounds but both brought great perspectives, and I so appreciated the respectfully positive disagreements.
Loved your journey of awakening via 911. Mine only began over 15 years later following the Russian involvement in Syria.
For me, the other major trigger points were as follows:
__________
49:20 – Sigmar: “what does it mean to be heroic?”
I have yet to read it all but in Thomas Carlyle’s “Heroes and Hero Worship” - “Chapter 5 - Hero as Man of Letters” – you find this nugget
“In Books lies the soul of the whole Past Time.“
__________
52:40 – Sigmar: ”doing the right thing should always be your primary objective”
“The fate of man is, in his life on earth, to confront the outbreak of uninvited evil. It is impossible to avoid this fate; and thus there are only two possibilities: either to be dishonourable and turn away from this struggle, to dishonourably live through it by both blindness and cowardice, or the honourable path of accepting it, comprehending this acceptance as a service and remaining faithful to its vocation.“
Ivan Ilyin - “On Resistance to Evil by Force” (Chapter 21)
(I tend to agree with Sigmar that there are people that are inherently evil – and that they will congregate within the ‘system’ (or ideology) that accommodates their evilness.)
__________
54:08 – Tereza: ”we don’t need colonies – what we need is control over our own labour"
Reference: “Fascism:100 Questions Asked and Answered” by Sir Oswald Mosley. In particular, Mosley’s answers to::
42. If you are going to exclude foreign imports, will you not damage British export trade ?
43. What will be the effect of excluding imports upon the people who hold foreign investments?
Again, wonderful conversation – educational and inspiring.
Speaking of book reviews, my copy of Shantaram just came! You will accept credit for that instigation, yes? https://juliusskoolafish.substack.com/p/shantaram-by-gregory-david-roberts.
'Respectfully positive disagreements' is a great way to put it. I also felt good about that.
You may have noticed that I pulled you into the fray over the 'boomer truth narrative.' I'm surrounded by far too many clueless millennials to throw my generation under the bus. And I'm only guessing we're the same generation from your sweet story about taking the grandkids to tea. So while 911 was the beginning of my WTF awakening, you've been making up for those lost 15 yrs at 4X speed!
However, I do think there's a correlation. The holocaust narrative couldn't be promoted when there were lots of veterans around who knew the truth. It was the 1960's it was launched, full steam ahead, by Hollywood. I think that was in reaction to Benjamin Freedman's speech in 1961. So my generation got the full brunt of that through our formative years. It wasn't 1945 when that changed but 1961. Even when I was in school, the first association with 'holocaust' was 'nuclear.'
You and Sigmar are welcome to believe there are inherently evil people but, if inherent, who made them that way? For Sigmar, it could be a Norse pagan god, and we know how temperamental they can be. But if a creator God made them evil, then God is evil. Yes? Argue your way out of that, my friend!
Well at least God didn’t create any inherently evil Orcas, so maybe it’s only humans that can be the worm in the apple.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9LdeMMQKSE
Otherwise, I’m keeping my head out of that front-loader … 😊
Hey, Orcas get all the credit but I counted just as many humans huddling around. And I'm sure many of them were making encouraging vocalizations.
And from what I gathered from the narrator, Orcas are all inherently evil and this pod has been feminized by its domi-matrix. As a matter of fact, I think these are little pansy Orcas (said in a sing-song particular to playgrounds).
I couldn't have stood him, for being dismissive.
You are Coraggio....
I really appreciate you listening, jacquelyn. I debated it, knowing that we disagreed in some significant ways. For one, I revel in the mixing of cultures, which I consider the best of the US. I'd just gotten out of my Worldanz class where we did Bollywood, Senegalese, Jamaican dance hall, samba and Michael Jackson. My dance teacher is as degenerate as possible, which is the only reason we put up with her insanely strenuous workout. She makes us laugh. But I suspect Sigmar would be okay with that too.
Sigmar and I both come from Appalachia, and I've often thought my hometown gives the lie to white privilege. We're planning another interview specifically on the rape of Appalachia, a history that goes back to Alexander Hamilton. Especially with Mr. Hillbilly Elegy a heartbeat away from the Oval Office, it's another lie that needs to be exposed.
Yet it's occurred to me that this movement parallels, in many ways, the ideology of the Torah. They're both against intermarriage or assimilation into other cultures. They don't want children of mixed blood. There's a belief that anything you do for 'your people' is good. They emphasize hierarchy and ancestral religion.
I was glad to hear that Sigmar didn't think there should be empires over foreign colonies, but that each country should be ruled by their own. However, I think Appalachia was turned into an internal labor-and-resource colony. I don't think being ruled by white men turned out very well for us.
Thanks again! It's lovely to think of you listening to me!
I finally got around to watching the video. I’m grateful that these conversations are being had because, just like you mentioned in the podcast, I am one of the people that woke up after the covidcon and now promptly think if they lied about that, what else have they been lying about.
And, my woo woo friend, I’m also not convinced we’re individuals but more like drops that all comes from the same ocean.
Thanks for the woo woo, Tonika. I feel like we need all we can get these days.
Saving this to watch later. Requires focused time without the kids around. 🤗
At 41:15 you mentioned Mark R. Elsis of “EarthNewspaper”. Here is a good window into his work.
• Hitler Wanted To Take Over The World by Mark R. Elsis
https://earthnewspaper.com/mark-r-elsis/hitler-wanted-to-take-over-the-world-by-mark-r-elsis/
and see a wealth of supplementary links following the main article
Thanks for that reference, Julius! That was a great article, along with his other links.
And I'm a deep thinker but a slow one--I was often formulating a response to Sigmar's last question while he was asking a new one. That's my only excuse for forgetting about Ron Unz during the interview, which I hope to have made up here.
There's another article I was saving to show you, this: https://healthimpactnews.com/2025/the-end-of-the-first-amendment-only-zionist-jewish-voices-allowed-on-u-s-campuses. It quotes WH speaker saying 'Anti-semitism is a virus that's spreading' (I also read something titled Measles & the Anti-Vax Virus, so this formula's being used elsewhere). And it quotes Kennedy that anti-semitism is a 'virulent pestilence.' Here's a quote from it:
“Anti-Semitism – like racism – is a spiritual and moral malady that sickens societies and kills people with lethalities comparable to history’s most deadly plagues,” wrote Kennedy in an announcement on Monday evening, adding:
'In recent years, the censorship and false narratives of woke cancel culture have transformed our great universities into greenhouses for this deadly and virulent pestilence. Making America healthy means building communities of trust and mutual respect, based on speech freedom and open debate.'
"Kennedy then linked to a press release announcing a joint-effort by the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the General Services Administration to “end anti-semitic harassment on college campuses,” beginning with a “comprehensive review of Columbia University’s federal contracts and grants in light of ongoing investigations for potential violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.”
The logic of this is so confused that I don't think there can be any doubt that Kennedy never had any intention of doing good, but has been part of the con from the get-go.
Anti-semitism kills people with the lethality of history's most deadly plagues? How does that work exactly? And woke cancel culture's censorship and false narratives (can't even tell what that means) has created a greenhouse for this pestilence? Combating anti-semitism is now a function of providing health services? Building communities of speech freedom and open debate means cracking down on free speech and debate regarding Israel? That's so Orwellian I don't have words, other than the recognition that Kennedy isn't this stupid. Which means he's complicit and always has been.
I was going to give you a one-word response ... we will let that topic unfold:
"Loxism"
• RFK Now Pushing mRNA for Measles! Is he being Blackmailed or showing his True Colors? - Stew Peters Network
https://rumble.com/v6q4zhg-rfk-now-pushing-mrna-for-measles-is-he-being-blackmailed-or-showing-his-tru.html
Daniel Kristos (unfortunately) insists that Stew Peters is a honey pot/controlled opposition, but I haven’t come to that conclusion …
Just now seeing this, it was a pleasure having you on the show 👍🏻
Really enjoyed this interview, Tereza. Maybe I'll get to 'Hellstorm' I don't know.
I'm grateful this undoing of historical narratives that could never be questioned. And for your part in that. So important.
David Irving is an idiot. Ask Dave Cole.
My policy, Gunther, is that I don't allow anyone to be insulted on my stack, as individuals or groups, including myself. However I allow all ideas to be freely challenged. If you have specific examples of where David Irving is wrong as a historian, please provide them. But character attacks don't count as an argument, nor does citing another person as an authority without quoting what they've said that proves your point.
Well, go ask Dave Cole! He´s got a stack just like you. Now, "specific examples of where David Irving is wrong as a historian?". Being wrong "as a historian" is not the basis for which I call him an IDIOT. His IDIOTIC behavior in public, very well documented and notorious, is what makes him an idiot.
"go ask Dave Cole" is what I call the rhetorical fallacy of 'throwing the book at it.' You made the statement that he's an idiot but I need to go do the research to prove your point to myself. If you've read Dave Cole and he's given examples showing David Irving is an idiot, cite them. Otherwise, don't throw around unsubstantiated insults.
Here is a rather good, albeit not comprehensive, demonstration of a man who could not keep his mouth shut, when it needed to be kept shut:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JF4GFGMNm3g
Dave Cole, looking back at his own notorious career AS A YOUNG MAN, could not imagine having repeated his foolish choices AS AN OLD MAN - as is David Irving obviously, in this dated video. This is why I call David Irving an idiot. Perhaps Dave Cole would have told you as much. Perhaps not.
Now, I don´t know anything about your background, as you know nothing about mine, but I suspect that unlike myself, now 62 years old, you did NOT grow up around all this history, surrounded by it in the form of elderly and not so elderly friends and relatives, and that you, like all my little American friends growing up in America in the 60's and 70's, were more interested in music and sports and movies and television.
Now everybody makes content.
You're absolutely right that you know nothing about my background. But I don't make assumptions about yours. I will tell my daughter your suspicion that 'like all your little American friends' I grew up more interested in music and sports and movies and television. It will give her a good laugh.
I haven't yet watched but I'll post the top comments in reply to it:
"This isn't an interview, it boils my blood to see this reporter asking a question and not giving a chance for Mr. David to answer let alone listening to what he says. Shame on you BBC" 70 likes
"I'm so impressed by how calm and polite Irving remains. I've always bought the popular narrative, but now I see that everything he says adds up." 219 likes
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,” God blessed David Irving with reasoning. 1000 likes
"He is so articulate and gentlemanly in his approach to defending himself. Quite a remarkable man and one with whom I uphold the greatest amount of respect." 41 likes
"If the truth is self-evident why does it need to be protected by law?" 3400 likes
"Its a fundamental right to question events. Any country that jails someone for their opinion and makes free speech illegal must be condemned." 41 likes
"What a man!!! Thank you for exposing the Evil Lies" 157 likes
"This is the craziest rabbit hole I’ve ever gone down. What an incredible man." 357 likes
"One thing I learned from this is how the media cleverly cherry picks phrases out of context to smear your character, discredit and break and demolish your credibility" 211 likes
"The honesty of the man in spite of being harassed by a biased interviewer is clear to anyone. Disgusting lack of journalism from BBC." 370 likes
"Anyone advocating 100% truth based on his honest conviction has no reason to fear open debate. If you imprison someone dissenting from a generally accepted but untested/undebated theory, you may well be imprisoning the truth, thus precluding advances in civilisation. Judging from the lecture he gave on YouTube, he is an extremely well-learned man on the subject he talked about with impeccable scholastic conscience and incredible powers of memory." 41 likes
"There's a strange similarity with this journalist and piers morgan, interrupting attacking the guest. Whether right or wrong let the guest talk and let the viewer hear them, whether right or wrong. it's called respect" 471 likes
"One thing is for certain. That is the best I've ever seen someone handle being on the hot seat and not becoming unglued. Irving was professional and reserved, however he matched this incredibly hard interviewer who hammered him for all 24 minutes relentlessly, word for word and gave back just as hard as he got without ever losing his cool." 499 likes
"Thank you David for all your work over the years it’s amazing how they get away with there lies even when presented with facts" 20 likes
"One of the finest historians ever, and his life was ruined for writing the truth. Tells you a lot about western democracies." 16 likes
"When someone not only forbids you to question a past event but makes it illegal and threatens you with a costly lawsuit and imprisonment, you have to ask yourself what is being hidden." 1100 likes
"This interview was the last time the BBC dared to give Irving a hearing. He proved so popular and ignited so much interest they would never risk it now." 645 likes
"The blatent hostility of this reporter is remarkable." 918 likes
"maybe they call the show "hardtalk" because of how hard it is to talk when you get interrupted midway through every sentence" 13 likes
There are many more comments but I haven't found a positive one yet.
You should go ask Karl Radl what he thinks of David Cole! …
• The Laughable Irrelevance of David Cole
https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/the-laughable-irrelevance-of-david
• David Cole: Jewish Con-Man
https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/david-cole-jewish-con-man
• David Cole's Denial of Holocaust Denial
https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/david-coles-denial-of-holocaust-denial
• David Cole lies about ‘Holocaust Denial’ (Again)
https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/david-cole-lies-about-holocaust-denial
And there you go! JEW HATING is back in fashion! Congratulations Tereza!
I recommend Konrad Heiden, "The Fuhrer", (1944), chapter I.