Jimychanga has been supplying me with a multi-faceted view of Israel and Palestine, to which I’ll be responding. This started with Whose Land is it Anyways? in which he links Bibi Netanyahu making his case in an interview with Jordan Peterson. Another included a recent Yuval Noah Harari on Hamas and Gaza that derides Netanyahu and calls for a global order. And the third is a previous Jordan Peterson interview in which Maajid Narwaz responds to the Netanyahu interview. The videos are below with some thoughts on each.
But first, I wanted to post some links so I can close some of my 100+ open tabs. All of these are worth reading but I wanted to keep my response focused on the above three:
Julius Skoolafish had reviewed Son of Hamas by Mosab Hassan Yousef and raised some red flags. These had also occurred to me in watching the videos of Mosab.
Asa Winstanley of Palestine is Still the Issue is presenting some great sources. This one from the Electronic Intifada reports that UK Labour says Israel has “right” to starve Gaza children. And The world stands with Palestine again shows current protests, including in countries that forbid them, and ones from 2021.
Mnar Adley of MintPress News has put out a video on Gaza Concentration Camp, which might be the best primer I’ve seen on Gaza.
Vanessa Beeley has posted Western Framing of the War as Hamas vs. Israel is Deliberate—to Delegitimize Palestinian Resistance. It includes a very personal statement from Levantine journalist, Marwa Osman on the bombed hospital, and Vanessa’s interview of her. Marwa’s 4-min video is essential watching.
Shahid Bolson of Middle Nation has another very interesting video on Message to the Israeli People.
Teresa’s Impromptu Scribblings has a link to the 1948 film, Creation & Catastrophe on the “establishment of Israel as seen through the eyes of the people who lived it.”
Matthieu Lumiere has stayed focused on Israel’s vaccine policies, which is an important clue to their subservience to the WEF. And Jimychanga posts World’s Most Concentrated Open Air Prison, by which he means for unvaxxed Israelis.
Jimychanga also quotes Martin Armstrong and links a short video of Putin’s view of the conflict and offer to mediate.
Charles Wright shows up Ron DeSantis as welcoming Israelis to Florida with a free charter flight and saying that as President, he would allow no one from Gaza.
A 5-min video on Mossad’s responsibility for 911. Powerful.
A very interesting article by Henry Makow on Were the Nazis the Greatest Hoax in History? And Just a Dude has posted The Hidden Hand of the Rothschilds.
And Unz Review is coming through, as usual. Ron Paul on Hamas’s Victory talks about the real reasons it’s Israel’s 911, although he blames both Osama and Hamas. In an earlier speech to Congress, however, he talks about how Hamas was formed by the US and Israel. James Corbett gives the real comparison (audio quality difficult to hear).
Pepe Escobar has an astute article on Slouching Towards the Final Solution that talks about the ‘Pipelineistan’ angle that 60% of the gas reserves discovered in 2010 legally belong to Palestine.
And essential reading from Frances Leader, I Don’t Argue with Israel Propaganda. It adds photos and formatting to a compilation of selected quotations from prominent Israeli and Zionist figures that embody the discourse of hatred, racism and rejection.
Greg Reese just posted a VERY elucidating short explanation of Zionism and the Creation of Israel that’s unlike anything I’ve read before … that is, before Nefahotep, Frances Leader, Fritz Freud and others introduced me to the Sabbateans, Frankists and Khazarians.
And hot off the press, Mathew Crawford has done an interview of Maadhava Setty who’s written a deep history of 911 making the comparison to now. Mathew’s article also includes mentions to Gabor Mate, and Matt Ehret’s The Peace of Westphalia as a Lesson in Solving Religious Wars Past Present or Future.
I’ve bookmarked Matt Ehret’s Why the Jews of Khazaria, the Himyarites and GokTurk Empire are Keys to Universal History for future reading that goes to the roots of the geopolitical psyops.
In this interview, Netanyahu’s source for the land grant to the Jews is the Bible. He goes back to Moses and then asks Jordan if he’s familiar with Jesus, rejoining that he was a Jew living there 2000 years ago. In the 7th century, the Arabs took the land of the Jewish farmers but let it die. It became a desolate, empty land that Mark Twain visited and said there was no one and nothing there but ‘sackcloth and ashes.’
However it can’t be said there was nothing there in 1917 when the German Bolshevik Jews turned on the country that had taken them in by pressuring the US to enter WWI after Germany had won and gone home. This shameful victory-by-trickery was paid by England with the land of Palestine in the Balfour Declaration. The same politicians and money lenders, namely Rothschilds, who had finagled this dishonorable victory then inflicted starvation on the Germans to force them into the Treaty of Versailles.
How did that 1% of Germans who were Jews end up owning one-third of German wealth? That question warrants more investigation. But we know how they expropriated that wealth with the assistance of Hitler in The Transfer Agreement. This was a negotiation in 1933 between Zionist organizations and the Nazis to transfer some 50,000 Jews and $100 million of assets to Jewish Palestine. As a result, the worldwide Jewish-led boycott against Hitler (‘Judea Declares War on Germany’ as 1933 headlines) was stopped.
When Netanyahu talks about the Jews turning Palestine into an oasis, that was with the $100M of farm equipment extracted from Germany under threat of revoking loans and boycotting trade. And Greg Reese above gives more reasons Israel shouldn’t be bragging about that.
Yuval begins this talk by comparing the attacks on Israel to pograms. He says that the Hamas terrorists don’t care about suffering, only about paradise. He speculates whether this was done now because of the Saudi initiative for peace, since Hamas doesn’t want peace. He mentions crimes against humanity like the decapitation of babies, at which point I knew he was complicit. He mentions the killing of a family that flew kites with peace messages over the wall, but once you know someone has lied, how can you take anything they say without question?
He says that this is the price Israel is paying for electing a populist strongman. Populist leaders like Trump and Netanyahu make people distrust institutions, central government, even elites. The international community needs to find a better solution, come in and disarm Hamas, demilitarize Palestine and rebuild Gaza. It’s going to be very expensive but if you really care about the suffering of people in the area, this is what you must do.
Biden is a great president, he says, coming in with those aircraft carriers. Zelensky is the most inspiring Jewish leader in the world [with his Nazi troops]. If you destroy the global order, you get chaos, disorder. Designing a global order is hard work! [But he and Klaus Schwab are up to the job.] The only offer on the table is the liberal global order. [Take it or leave it.]
Last, Jordan Peterson interviewed Maajid Nawaz, another member of the Dark Web who has written Radical: My Journey Out of Islamic Extremism. He spoke primarily about words, and how peace begins with the recognition that we are spiritual equals. When language is stigmatizing, there is only peace from superiority, aka Pax Americana. The phrase ‘Judeo-Christian civilization’ creates the ‘other’. When all people have left is their dignity, you can’t take that away.
Maajid says that words are spells, and from my previous episodes, Yuval agrees with him. But they certainly differ in that he see Klaus Schwab creating major shocks in the world, and he talks about the relationship between Israel and Pfizer [something Sasha Latypova has also researched]. When Netanyahu uses a squatter analogy to describe the Arabs living in Palestine, he excludes them as spiritual equals. And when Netanyahu says there was no Palestine, there was really no Israel before 1948.
From this Jordan segues into a study he and a graduate student did on ideologies that hang together—idea networks or webs of ideas. They found that a liberal compassionate inclusiveness also correlated with an authoritarian political correctness that was willing to use compulsion and force. He describes this as a postmodern neo-Marxist vengefulness that acts like a conspiracy but is self-forming.
The indicators for someone having this universe of PC ideas was:
low verbal intelligence that uses words like power and oppression
female
feminine temperament
taking a politically correct course
I’m glad that I read this because I now know the source of the idea network that I’ve been hearing parroted by several men. I’d love to dig into the data on how terms like ‘low verbal intelligence’ and ‘feminine temperament’ were defined, while ‘taking a PC course’ seems to be circular reasoning for a PC web of ideas—which came first?
I believe that Trump was the Great Setup to the Great Reset, cast into the role of turning compassionate liberals in favor of everything they’d formerly been against and against everything they’d formerly been for. By being as offensive as possible, Trump turned liberals into knee-jerk reactionaries who were pro-censorship, pro-Big Pharma, pro-Big Tech. This was a conspiracy, not self-forming, unless you think only some elections are rigged.
I’ve been noticing the pendulum being swung the other way. Justin Trudeau is warning Western nations of the dangers of a woke ideology. So the manipulation, of which Jordan is a witting or unwitting part, is to lead back to a ‘conservative’ obedience. I personally find Jordan’s debate style very bullying, and I’ll link two episodes on why I feel he’s patronizing towards women. So maybe obedience to authority doesn’t bother him, as long as he’s the authority.
Maajid ends by talking about Quranic Arabic being the oldest continuous language in the world because Aramaic had to be revived. As an aside, Max Blumenthal talked about Malula, Syria, being the oldest city in which Aramaic was spoken, the supposed language of the oral tradition of the Christian Bible. I say supposed because of research I’ll mention another time for why that wasn’t true. When Malula was bombed, Hezbollah stepped in to save it.
For Maajid, words lost their life force when we moved away from the oral tradition. Written words are idols, devoid of context. They have no connection to each other and their time and place. The analytical mind makes it impossible to conceive of the spiritual. Although he emphasized three times that he was ‘not a Luddite,’ he says that writing made us think our future is ahead and the past is behind when really it’s the opposite.
Guy Duperrault has also been talking about the slippery vs. fixed nature of words in The Evil of Good and the Good of Evil:
In it, he responds to my episode on Nina Jankowicz and the statement by Confucius that the first thing he would do in government is ‘fix language.’
When Maajid says, 3X, that he's not a Luddite, he means an ignorant, foolish person opposed to beneficial technology. The 'correct' history of the Luddites show they were brave revolutionaries tragically proven right when deadening, redundant factory jobs replaced their craft of weaving, making them subservient to the machines and taking away their means of making an independent living.
By changing the meaning of Luddite, the technocrats stole from Maajid and all of us the history that would have confirmed his point. The oligarchs didn't just win in the moment, they won a permanent victory over our minds and imaginations.
This has become especially relevant with the word 'terrorist.' I've challenged several people to define it without using proper nouns. People have accused me of semantics and sophistry but no one's answered the question—because, of course, they can't. There is no way to define terrorist so that it applies to Hamas but not the IDF. Palestinians are experiencing the harshest of terrors and every person who mindlessly parrots the word 'terrorist' is complicit in it.
For more on why I think Jordan Peterson is part of the patriarchal pyramid, here’s Waking the Dragon Mom:
Responding to Russell Brand's interview, I agree with Jordan that men and women are fundamentally different and I describe a feminine ideology, morality and shape of government. Jordan suggests a fourth branch of government as symbolic with a king. The symbol I'd choose for a feminine structure is the interlocking honeycomb with the child in the center and the queen bee serving the hive. Jordan proposes that lust isn't a sin when directed to the marriage, but I look at sin as seeing inferiority, including objectified wives. I end by applying problem-solving criteria to the pandemic and wonder what it will take to wake the dragon mom.
and this is The Divine Feminine:
Instead of women paid equally to serve investor profits, should men be liberated to serve family and community? I examine whether women even existed in government, economics or religion for the past 5000 years. I address Job and the Leviathan as a metaphor for Jordan's recent ordeals and query the missing feminine in the Trinity. I look at how divorce courts turn the family home into a dead asset, acknowledging an astute listener question on Russell's community newsletter. I end with two nods to the feminine divine: The HU's Song of Women and Wendall Berry's Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front.
Thank you.
You are weaving a lot here, Tereza and I know you can.
I will have to work my way through. Saw a handful of the videos you've referenced. (BTW Clif HIgh who introduced me to Khazarians, calls them them the name stealers who assumed jewish heritage.)
The endlessly debated interpretations of history, especially where religion is concerned, the emphasizing of stories that support specific views and agendas, the leveraging of crises as a means to advance totalitarian ideology (YH)... It's all so tired. And the idiotic abject horror of war. I think we're close to being over it. (It actually feels like history, even as I watch it play out in real time, like an echo full of empty. )
Yes, we humans are really starting to see it. How the ongoing scam works.
As always, appreciate your attentiveness and bright mind.
Tereza, I'm loving Henry Makow's site. Thank you.