"The presence of hot babes in yoga pants doesn’t impair the discernment of men in the least."
Absolutely true. We men have our emotions and desires entirely under the control of our extremely logical thought processes.
Edit: But seriously, maybe 15 years in rural Vermont made me immune to yoga pants. Today I saw a woman walking out of the hardware store who was wearing overalls, a flannel shirt, and work boots. Now that's hot!
Thanks, Tereza. So disappointing to hear Mathew's intervened that way. I'm surprised by that. From what I know of both of you (admittedly a better handle with you) and your respective stacks, I'd think differences of opinion would be welcome. Aren't we all just exploring ideas, speculating and offering up our unique perspectives?
Thanks for the chuckles peppered in with the insights. Best.
Are you surprised even after his post calling me mentally ill? It seems consistent with him publicly attacking my integrity and/or mental faculties. The only question is why.
I don't jump to the conclusion that someone is being paid to control the opposition when I disagree with them or they insult me. But I think it's a possibility that should be considered with Mathew. What I look for is a family and/or work history with intelligence agencies, past associations with known agents, public distancing when those agents are exposed, techniques of control, gathering a loyal cult following, rhetorical tricks/ NLP and information overload without meaning.
Malone met all of these, especially with Jill's dad being UK psyops. Mathew's first contact with me was after I posted https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/phony-maloney-and-wikispooks where I wrote about Malone's earlier post: "Controlled Opposition, Black Propaganda where he put me anonymously on notice that I’d be cut if I continued to criticize him, as he did after my next episode. In it, he cited five articles by Mathew Crawford on Chaos Agents and 5th Generation Warfare, quoting 'Keep in mind that in 5GW, you and your mind are the battlefield. Controlling the narrative and by extension your very thoughts and emotions are the objective.'"
I also mentioned Mathew's 1000 hr DMED project under Malone and the squeaky clean WikiSpooks on Malone edited by Liam, who worked under Mathew. Immediately after that post, without letting me know, they did a dissection of my video on Gigaohm, with JJ, Mathew, Liam and Mark Kulacz. It was sheer accident that I happened to see it because I looked for a clip that Sage Hana linked, and there I was in the livestream!
If Mathew had come out against Malone before that, Malone wouldn't have been linking his videos. This feels like a level of damage control. JJ says Malone introduced him to RFK, getting him his job. He wore a Mossad tee-shirt in one episode, given to him by a cousin, he later said: https://sars2.net/pfizerstew.html#J_J_Coueys_Mossad_t_shirt.
Liam gave an excuse that he couldn't put anything in the Wikispooks bio that wasn't verifiable but it's a repository for suspicions--all you need to do is cite someone else.
That same link states: "I previously thought that Housatonic got connected to George Webb because they were doing the same type of investigative research on COVID. However Housatonic was frequently talking to George Webb on Twitter in 2019, and in 2019 before Housatonic had his own YouTube channel, he appeared several times on John O'Loughlin's channel. In February 2019, O'Loughlin tagged Housatonic and George Webb in a tweet where he wrote: "George's videos on Periscope are available for replay, but Twitter doesn't always post them here. This is yesterday's Live at National Harbor, where George and I decide to launch a McDuff channel on Youtube! Exciting!" So George Webb was involved in launching the YouTube channel where Housatonic did his alt media debut. O'Loughlin is the son of a high-level FBI agent, and he is a retired lawyer who was a member of the DC Bar Association."
When I exposed Sasha Latypova, Mathew gave a strange response to my question about whether this matched the person he'd just met with. Now he's broken ties and Mark came out with 'Was Sasha Behind 9/11?' which offers nothing by way of proof, that I could find. It's like they're distancing without adding anything.
And of course, Mathew was raised under trauma-based mind control, which is supposed to make him now the expert of who is or isn't, but not make us suspicious of him ...
"Are you surprised even after his post calling me mentally ill?"
Yes. But that's me, slow to some realizations. I do tend to assume over-reaction or disproportional responses are usually the result of good people getting triggered - often in ways they are fully aware of. Mathew has spend so much time looking at who might be a chaos agent, I assume that skews judgement in that direction.
But given everything you've written - which is a level of investigation I don't do and frankly requires more effort than I'm willing to expend - I see where you're coming from. I've appreciated Marks and JJ's and at times George's work, all of which seems helpful and yet clearly all part of a shared web. I don't know what to think. Which is probably why I enjoy hanging out with trees so much. :-)
I'm venturing another reply, Kathleen, because getting a man to think like a mother is much harder than getting a mother to expand her system of thinking to global issues. Still extremely hard, but there's a chance.
Let's apply my tells for someone paid to control the opposition to me.
1) Family or work history with intelligence agencies. My dad was a railroad clerk in Appalachia, his dad was a barber. I was an HR Director for a software company and then a housewife for the last 20 yrs.
2) Associations with known agents. I've exposed Malone, Sasha, Eisenstein, RFK when it was unpopular to do so. Curiously, Substack tells me my blog has the most overlap in members with Sasha's. So I'm still telling people something they don't want to hear.
3) Distancing when agents are exposed. Mathew has used every manipulative technique possible to get me to slam Russell as a known Illuminati agent. Why?
4) Techniques of control. My focus is self-control.
5) Loyal cult following. When anyone agrees with everything I say, I know it's for the wrong reasons.
6) Rhetorical tricks. I name them so they can be recognized if I use them.
7) Information overload w/o meaning. The former, yes, but being ploddingly methodical about the step to extract the latter. As I'm doing now.
I don't know Mathew's method of determining Chaos Agents but I don't think they come out of nowhere. I'm also not saying that JJ, Mark, Liam or George are being paid to control the opposition. They may be part of the opposition that Mathew is paid to control. But the signs point to Mathew still working under Malone, from my analysis.
"...because getting a man to think like a mother is much harder than getting a mother to expand her system of thinking to global issues"
That's not even it though. I don't have any desire to delve into the minutia of who is or might be in some ongoing pysops and their endless controlled psyops. Interesting yes, good to be mindful, sure, but what pulls me in and what I enjoy exploring is in another direction entirely.
So, not looking to expand my system of thinking in this direction.
I'm so sorry, Kathleen, I put that poorly. Let me try again, because I don't think we're at odds here, I think I'm miscommunicating. 'Thinking like a mother' means, to me, wanting a world that enables us to take responsibility for families and communities rather than serving the rich.
'Expanding to global issues' means, to me, understanding the systems and stories that are tricking us into doing the latter when we think we're doing the former, and imagining the alternatives we'd want.
What joins all of our circle is that we saw through the Covid psyop. But what good did that do? We still suffered the social consequences of not getting vaccinated while everyone who could be tricked or coerced was. They won. The damage is done and all that's left now is the consequences.
No one thinks they've stopped there. How do we anticipate the next wave of psyops so that we're not reacting again? And how do we protect our credibility on the Covid psyops so that others might listen to us this time?
I don't care about judging people as good or bad, which goes against my fundamental principle that all people are inherently good. I use the same methods of loving the person, challenging the ideas to respond to everyone. But when I know, without needing to convince anyone else, that someone is being paid by the oligarchs, that's a gift. Now I can work backwards to figure out what their next psyops is and how they're doing it.
Mathew's overt attack on me released me from the bounds of politeness. That lets me bring forward the objective criteria that made me suspect he was part of the psyop. I'm doing another episode on Charles Eisenstein later today. What I notice about the agenda of both is that they're targeting alternative spiritualities and currencies. I think this is key to what's in motion now. But I always appreciate what draws you in, and I know your mind is always exploring in a direction that's true. We come to the same place by a different path.
Hahaha! Trees are never pretending to be something they're not. Although I had a Buddha Hand infested with scale and ants. I've lopped off all Hands but one, and may pull it out. It's right next to a Valencia orange and I noticed a branch with some scale -- and an orange that looks like it's becoming a Buddha Hand! There's a metaphor in there somewhere.
For me, the key phrase was at 5:00 – “… the more that I pulled on that thread, the more that the whole fabric unraveled … “
I thought this would interest you – I recommend watching the first 10 minutes – more if it interests you. I am going to post a question as to where he would place other propagandists like Matthew Ehret in this bucket paradigm.
• Yet More Diagrams (Read Description) - WellhereWeGo
Very interesting video. I'm one hour in and still listening. Yes, there are a lot of buckets I'd like to add. He definitely confirms my premise in my draft article on Every Time a Reptile is Blamed, an Oligarch Gets His Wings. I really like his term 'terrestial.' I think we should exhaust the terrestial possibilities before we move to alternatives.
Of course, being me, I'd rather he looked closer at the economics rather than the culture wars. Not that the latter isn't real but he's still playing their game, imo. He talks about how, if you're a dude, they're going to herd you into the Joe Rogan/ Jordan Peterson bucket. He mentions everyone they're going to turn you against ... except women. Other than Whitney Webb, there are no women. Superiority to women is a big part of this strategy and how men are hooked into it.
But his analysis is great. I'm fortunate to be tuned into the Skoolafish algorithm, that keeps nudging me towards things that make me smarter, not things that make me stupid.
your observations align with mine, overall. although i didn't notice the lack of estrogen presence so appreciate that.
his modelling is fleshing out my own sense of things so he has helped me with that and how to look. and i noticed similar trends to those he describes from the algorithm feeds.
interesting to me is that his exhortation to go into the community is exactly what my own muscle testing and intuition has directed me to do for 2025 and so i've begun that. one of the things keeping me busy and less active in stack stuff. hmmmmm
the link is interesting. i seem to be coming across more and more qoj.
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
Hello Guy, something about the way you communicate here makes me think you (and T Czarina) will like the following. By sheer chance and good fortune, I am having dinner with Catchadragon (G) tomorrow night. I always listen at speed x2, of course.
• Inside stories from on the Road 2024 - Catchadragon
• The phenomenal people plus unplanned events that challenge us as you step out
"The world is an amazing mystery. When we step out of our normal routine it is like we we speed up the universe and time, condense truth and life into a bombshell and throw it at ourselves, as the Goddess of Earth Sophia says;
“you think you can take this pill…well I have a surprise for you….Here is some Mother of a time that not even the Bard himself could have dreamed up.
This is the story of some of the people I met and the unforeseen events that happened to me on the road in late 2024 ..."
Phenomenal photos on that site. I'll listen while unpacking from my visit with my daughter. I envy you both getting an in-person dinner! Although I just arranged to visit Mary McLaughlin for two days in March, so that's making me only chartreuse with envy, not all the way green ;-)
It sounds like you're making his phenomenal people and unplanned events come to life, with a little bit of planning.
I think I will just listen to more of his amazing human experiences, and world outlook - perhaps share some book journeys and mull over how we got here!
I want to ask him about Sophia, the mother of all living things.
Yes, I just finished it at 1.5X and it was still quite a relaxed pace. He has lovely observations about people. If you find a way to gently query him about why he closes comments, except to paid subs, I'd be curious. It just seems a bit counter to his travel mode, of meeting people and seeing what they have to share.
I've wondered if the attack on the beautiful replica of Hagia Sophia, that Vanessa writes about, is a symbolic attack on the feminine. He mentions the gnostics and Sophia, which is usually the Sethian myth in which Sophia tries to create without a man and get the demiurge who, like Pandora's box, unleashes all ills into the world. However Seth has no problem having progeny without a woman. I'm also suspicious of Seth / Set as that fratricidal pathological god that becomes YHWH. So I'll be curious what you find out.
I could not comment originally (paid only) and messaged him on chat - found that I was able to add my comment just today. I think he just struggles with understanding default substack settings.
Yes, I am keen to explore Sophia, also for deeply personal reasons to do with my daughter. She has leant me her book "Pistis Sophia - A Coptic Text of Gnosis With Commentary". I have no idea where it will take me.
i appreciate your observation and i have also appreciated your style and quality of communication. i'll take a look here too.
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy. 🙏❤️🧘♂️🙌☯️🙌🧘♂️❤️🙏
“As a woman, I think with my vagina. Being driven by my hormones, when a sexy guy walks in, my ability to reason flies out the window. Women are different than men this way. The presence of hot babes in yoga pants doesn’t impair the discernment of men in the least. That’s why they don’t bother using beautiful women in ads—what good would it do?”
"Yuval in saying that money is the most successful story ever told, and Yannis that democracy is a fig leaf for oligarchy"
Harari is right and he certainly knows Deut. 15:6. He goes as far as saying the religion is fake news, but I never heard him say that religion is the most successful story of mind control ever told.
Russel Brand plays the game according to the "imposed" dialectical rules. The biggest threat to freedom is Judaism, Islam and Christianity being only its by-products and poles of the dialectical game.
I agree with you, jamalh, that religion is the most successful psyop ever told. What's an example of Russell Brand using a dialectic? Do you mean his example of 10,000 villages instead of centralized control? I think the imposed dialectic on this is individuality vs. centralized authority. It ignores that individuals without community can only relate through centralized mechanisms. Skipping over the village--as libertarianism does, to my understanding--puts us back at the mercy of the oligarchs.
I was reacting to your comment to Russel Brand's question "What’s The Biggest Threat To Freedom - Islam Or Consumerism?" that you provided on a linked article. His recent conversion occurring in the context of a forced invasion of Muslims into the Western world is only adding fuel to the "eschatological" scenario planned by the Globalists.
Sam Harris, at that time, had been using burqas and suicide bombers to show that religious ideology, particularly of Islam, was the source of all evil. Russell Brand's interview, which was in Feb of 2018, changed the question to, "What's the biggest threat to freedom, Islam or consumerism?"
In my video, I changed the question again to Ideology vs Capitalism, defined as ownership of the assets. Are Muslims being forced or paid to invade? I'm certain you're right that this is to add fuel to the eschatological scenario. But I'd still say that false ownership of the assets that back the money--the homes--is at the root of it. Yet I suspect you're right and the mind-control of religion came first in ancient history and continues to be a mind-trap that keeps us stuck.
I consider Russell Brand to be the sort of damaged goods that results naturally from someone of his genetic makeup and social background getting into the sort of circles of power that he had, and being turned against what is best in himself more and more until his persona shattered but it did so in a way favorable to escaping that fire, and ending up in the frying pan of controlled opposition without realizing it. It has almost happened to me many times.
I spent my whole young life after escaping a cult traipsing around like a Bohemian from one frying pan to another, one direction of career or study to another, one worldview to another, but never stayed anywhere too long because I kept one survival instinct strong: If it seems oppress my better judgement in any way, then it is my enemy. Perhaps Brand will come to realize that Trump's actions with regard to his Jewish/Israeli backers and his cabinet picks (in both terms), along with his prior associations, as well as his Operation Warped Sheep and now his Operation Stargate Panopticon are just not excusable as advanced chess strategy.
Or maybe he won't. But either way, what need is there to judge him beyond noting his degree of knowledge and discernment or lack thereof? It's not as if I have to go to Church of Russell Brand if I don't condemn his entire being. Nor does a failure to condemn his entire being amount to any form of acquiescence to his worldview, nor a condoning of anything about him. I also don't know if he raped anyone.
But I would only add this: Yoga has been a hotbed of rape accusations before that ever became a MeToo issue, so it doesn't to me indicate prima facie evidence against rapiness.
Fifth Column, I'm not sure if you recognize that you're doing the exact same thing that Mathew has done. Based on his superficial observations of Russell's public persona up to 2012, he labels me as gullible and naive for finding Russell's thoughts and ideas of value. He tells my interviewer I am gullible and naive, at best, complicit at worst.
I have 50 videos that respond to Russell's interviews, please look at just one of them and tell me what I 'fall for' or what his worldview is. In these videos of Yuval, his worldview is that we should have the 10,000 self-governing villages of Gandhi rather than centralized gov't and economies. Do you disagree with that?
Can you quote me something Russell has said between 2012 and 2023 that makes you consider him damaged goods? How much have you listened to him from between those times? From the 100+ hrs I've spent listening to his interviews, his mind is as sharp and discerning as anyone's I've ever found. If I could have found anyone who was making more sense than him, I would have listened to them instead.
What genetic makeup do you mean? Are you determined by your genes? You're making a lot of declarative statements without providing examples. It's not Russell you're judging, it's my discernment or lack thereof. I'm not going to concede that I'm not capable of thinking clearly without some details. How did Russell serve the Israeli agenda post-2012 and pre-sextroversy when he was, I think, brought to heel to serve Trump?
I'm sorry that I seemed to have such a position, Tereza. I don't hold the view of you that Mathew (of whom I don't know) does. I was not aware of your stance on Brand either. I'm just putting out my thoughts about him in a way that is "from the side" so to speak. I just analyze people in society from the optimum of my own information about them and and the world around us, and my own worldview. Oh, by the way, please don't be offput by it, but I have begun a series on Codex Theodosianus (have you heard of it?). I start off with my own thesis about Saul of Tarsus, and about the initial phases of the Christian movement, and then lay out the general idea of how that movement has worked then as a prelude to discussing how we ended up under laws that CT codified and has extended throughout the world through the expansion of Papal power and its offshoots. Tell me what you think? https://nonfifth.substack.com/p/codex-theodosianus
"The presence of hot babes in yoga pants doesn’t impair the discernment of men in the least."
Absolutely true. We men have our emotions and desires entirely under the control of our extremely logical thought processes.
Edit: But seriously, maybe 15 years in rural Vermont made me immune to yoga pants. Today I saw a woman walking out of the hardware store who was wearing overalls, a flannel shirt, and work boots. Now that's hot!
Thanks, Tereza. So disappointing to hear Mathew's intervened that way. I'm surprised by that. From what I know of both of you (admittedly a better handle with you) and your respective stacks, I'd think differences of opinion would be welcome. Aren't we all just exploring ideas, speculating and offering up our unique perspectives?
Thanks for the chuckles peppered in with the insights. Best.
Are you surprised even after his post calling me mentally ill? It seems consistent with him publicly attacking my integrity and/or mental faculties. The only question is why.
I don't jump to the conclusion that someone is being paid to control the opposition when I disagree with them or they insult me. But I think it's a possibility that should be considered with Mathew. What I look for is a family and/or work history with intelligence agencies, past associations with known agents, public distancing when those agents are exposed, techniques of control, gathering a loyal cult following, rhetorical tricks/ NLP and information overload without meaning.
Malone met all of these, especially with Jill's dad being UK psyops. Mathew's first contact with me was after I posted https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/phony-maloney-and-wikispooks where I wrote about Malone's earlier post: "Controlled Opposition, Black Propaganda where he put me anonymously on notice that I’d be cut if I continued to criticize him, as he did after my next episode. In it, he cited five articles by Mathew Crawford on Chaos Agents and 5th Generation Warfare, quoting 'Keep in mind that in 5GW, you and your mind are the battlefield. Controlling the narrative and by extension your very thoughts and emotions are the objective.'"
I also mentioned Mathew's 1000 hr DMED project under Malone and the squeaky clean WikiSpooks on Malone edited by Liam, who worked under Mathew. Immediately after that post, without letting me know, they did a dissection of my video on Gigaohm, with JJ, Mathew, Liam and Mark Kulacz. It was sheer accident that I happened to see it because I looked for a clip that Sage Hana linked, and there I was in the livestream!
If Mathew had come out against Malone before that, Malone wouldn't have been linking his videos. This feels like a level of damage control. JJ says Malone introduced him to RFK, getting him his job. He wore a Mossad tee-shirt in one episode, given to him by a cousin, he later said: https://sars2.net/pfizerstew.html#J_J_Coueys_Mossad_t_shirt.
Liam gave an excuse that he couldn't put anything in the Wikispooks bio that wasn't verifiable but it's a repository for suspicions--all you need to do is cite someone else.
That same link states: "I previously thought that Housatonic got connected to George Webb because they were doing the same type of investigative research on COVID. However Housatonic was frequently talking to George Webb on Twitter in 2019, and in 2019 before Housatonic had his own YouTube channel, he appeared several times on John O'Loughlin's channel. In February 2019, O'Loughlin tagged Housatonic and George Webb in a tweet where he wrote: "George's videos on Periscope are available for replay, but Twitter doesn't always post them here. This is yesterday's Live at National Harbor, where George and I decide to launch a McDuff channel on Youtube! Exciting!" So George Webb was involved in launching the YouTube channel where Housatonic did his alt media debut. O'Loughlin is the son of a high-level FBI agent, and he is a retired lawyer who was a member of the DC Bar Association."
When I exposed Sasha Latypova, Mathew gave a strange response to my question about whether this matched the person he'd just met with. Now he's broken ties and Mark came out with 'Was Sasha Behind 9/11?' which offers nothing by way of proof, that I could find. It's like they're distancing without adding anything.
And of course, Mathew was raised under trauma-based mind control, which is supposed to make him now the expert of who is or isn't, but not make us suspicious of him ...
"Are you surprised even after his post calling me mentally ill?"
Yes. But that's me, slow to some realizations. I do tend to assume over-reaction or disproportional responses are usually the result of good people getting triggered - often in ways they are fully aware of. Mathew has spend so much time looking at who might be a chaos agent, I assume that skews judgement in that direction.
But given everything you've written - which is a level of investigation I don't do and frankly requires more effort than I'm willing to expend - I see where you're coming from. I've appreciated Marks and JJ's and at times George's work, all of which seems helpful and yet clearly all part of a shared web. I don't know what to think. Which is probably why I enjoy hanging out with trees so much. :-)
I'm venturing another reply, Kathleen, because getting a man to think like a mother is much harder than getting a mother to expand her system of thinking to global issues. Still extremely hard, but there's a chance.
Let's apply my tells for someone paid to control the opposition to me.
1) Family or work history with intelligence agencies. My dad was a railroad clerk in Appalachia, his dad was a barber. I was an HR Director for a software company and then a housewife for the last 20 yrs.
2) Associations with known agents. I've exposed Malone, Sasha, Eisenstein, RFK when it was unpopular to do so. Curiously, Substack tells me my blog has the most overlap in members with Sasha's. So I'm still telling people something they don't want to hear.
3) Distancing when agents are exposed. Mathew has used every manipulative technique possible to get me to slam Russell as a known Illuminati agent. Why?
4) Techniques of control. My focus is self-control.
5) Loyal cult following. When anyone agrees with everything I say, I know it's for the wrong reasons.
6) Rhetorical tricks. I name them so they can be recognized if I use them.
7) Information overload w/o meaning. The former, yes, but being ploddingly methodical about the step to extract the latter. As I'm doing now.
I don't know Mathew's method of determining Chaos Agents but I don't think they come out of nowhere. I'm also not saying that JJ, Mark, Liam or George are being paid to control the opposition. They may be part of the opposition that Mathew is paid to control. But the signs point to Mathew still working under Malone, from my analysis.
"...because getting a man to think like a mother is much harder than getting a mother to expand her system of thinking to global issues"
That's not even it though. I don't have any desire to delve into the minutia of who is or might be in some ongoing pysops and their endless controlled psyops. Interesting yes, good to be mindful, sure, but what pulls me in and what I enjoy exploring is in another direction entirely.
So, not looking to expand my system of thinking in this direction.
Thanks.
I'm so sorry, Kathleen, I put that poorly. Let me try again, because I don't think we're at odds here, I think I'm miscommunicating. 'Thinking like a mother' means, to me, wanting a world that enables us to take responsibility for families and communities rather than serving the rich.
'Expanding to global issues' means, to me, understanding the systems and stories that are tricking us into doing the latter when we think we're doing the former, and imagining the alternatives we'd want.
What joins all of our circle is that we saw through the Covid psyop. But what good did that do? We still suffered the social consequences of not getting vaccinated while everyone who could be tricked or coerced was. They won. The damage is done and all that's left now is the consequences.
No one thinks they've stopped there. How do we anticipate the next wave of psyops so that we're not reacting again? And how do we protect our credibility on the Covid psyops so that others might listen to us this time?
I don't care about judging people as good or bad, which goes against my fundamental principle that all people are inherently good. I use the same methods of loving the person, challenging the ideas to respond to everyone. But when I know, without needing to convince anyone else, that someone is being paid by the oligarchs, that's a gift. Now I can work backwards to figure out what their next psyops is and how they're doing it.
Mathew's overt attack on me released me from the bounds of politeness. That lets me bring forward the objective criteria that made me suspect he was part of the psyop. I'm doing another episode on Charles Eisenstein later today. What I notice about the agenda of both is that they're targeting alternative spiritualities and currencies. I think this is key to what's in motion now. But I always appreciate what draws you in, and I know your mind is always exploring in a direction that's true. We come to the same place by a different path.
I don't think we're at odds either, Tereza. And appreciate the apology but not needed.
Jan has been a bear in multiple ways and I haven't had a lot of bandwidth for much. Thanks for the thoughtful reply. XO
Hahaha! Trees are never pretending to be something they're not. Although I had a Buddha Hand infested with scale and ants. I've lopped off all Hands but one, and may pull it out. It's right next to a Valencia orange and I noticed a branch with some scale -- and an orange that looks like it's becoming a Buddha Hand! There's a metaphor in there somewhere.
For me, the key phrase was at 5:00 – “… the more that I pulled on that thread, the more that the whole fabric unraveled … “
I thought this would interest you – I recommend watching the first 10 minutes – more if it interests you. I am going to post a question as to where he would place other propagandists like Matthew Ehret in this bucket paradigm.
• Yet More Diagrams (Read Description) - WellhereWeGo
https://odysee.com/@WellhereWeGo:a/Yet-More-Diagrams:3
Very interesting video. I'm one hour in and still listening. Yes, there are a lot of buckets I'd like to add. He definitely confirms my premise in my draft article on Every Time a Reptile is Blamed, an Oligarch Gets His Wings. I really like his term 'terrestial.' I think we should exhaust the terrestial possibilities before we move to alternatives.
Of course, being me, I'd rather he looked closer at the economics rather than the culture wars. Not that the latter isn't real but he's still playing their game, imo. He talks about how, if you're a dude, they're going to herd you into the Joe Rogan/ Jordan Peterson bucket. He mentions everyone they're going to turn you against ... except women. Other than Whitney Webb, there are no women. Superiority to women is a big part of this strategy and how men are hooked into it.
But his analysis is great. I'm fortunate to be tuned into the Skoolafish algorithm, that keeps nudging me towards things that make me smarter, not things that make me stupid.
i'm still listening too.
your observations align with mine, overall. although i didn't notice the lack of estrogen presence so appreciate that.
his modelling is fleshing out my own sense of things so he has helped me with that and how to look. and i noticed similar trends to those he describes from the algorithm feeds.
interesting to me is that his exhortation to go into the community is exactly what my own muscle testing and intuition has directed me to do for 2025 and so i've begun that. one of the things keeping me busy and less active in stack stuff. hmmmmm
hola, js.
the link is interesting. i seem to be coming across more and more qoj.
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
🙏❤️🧘♂️🙌☯️🙌🧘♂️❤️🙏
Hello Guy, something about the way you communicate here makes me think you (and T Czarina) will like the following. By sheer chance and good fortune, I am having dinner with Catchadragon (G) tomorrow night. I always listen at speed x2, of course.
• Inside stories from on the Road 2024 - Catchadragon
• The phenomenal people plus unplanned events that challenge us as you step out
https://catchadragon.substack.com/p/inside-stories-from-on-the-road-2024
Edit:
Catchadragon writes:
"The world is an amazing mystery. When we step out of our normal routine it is like we we speed up the universe and time, condense truth and life into a bombshell and throw it at ourselves, as the Goddess of Earth Sophia says;
“you think you can take this pill…well I have a surprise for you….Here is some Mother of a time that not even the Bard himself could have dreamed up.
This is the story of some of the people I met and the unforeseen events that happened to me on the road in late 2024 ..."
Phenomenal photos on that site. I'll listen while unpacking from my visit with my daughter. I envy you both getting an in-person dinner! Although I just arranged to visit Mary McLaughlin for two days in March, so that's making me only chartreuse with envy, not all the way green ;-)
It sounds like you're making his phenomenal people and unplanned events come to life, with a little bit of planning.
I think I will just listen to more of his amazing human experiences, and world outlook - perhaps share some book journeys and mull over how we got here!
I want to ask him about Sophia, the mother of all living things.
Yes, I just finished it at 1.5X and it was still quite a relaxed pace. He has lovely observations about people. If you find a way to gently query him about why he closes comments, except to paid subs, I'd be curious. It just seems a bit counter to his travel mode, of meeting people and seeing what they have to share.
I've wondered if the attack on the beautiful replica of Hagia Sophia, that Vanessa writes about, is a symbolic attack on the feminine. He mentions the gnostics and Sophia, which is usually the Sethian myth in which Sophia tries to create without a man and get the demiurge who, like Pandora's box, unleashes all ills into the world. However Seth has no problem having progeny without a woman. I'm also suspicious of Seth / Set as that fratricidal pathological god that becomes YHWH. So I'll be curious what you find out.
Thanks for recommending him to me!
I could not comment originally (paid only) and messaged him on chat - found that I was able to add my comment just today. I think he just struggles with understanding default substack settings.
Yes, I am keen to explore Sophia, also for deeply personal reasons to do with my daughter. She has leant me her book "Pistis Sophia - A Coptic Text of Gnosis With Commentary". I have no idea where it will take me.
hola, otra vez, js.
i appreciate your observation and i have also appreciated your style and quality of communication. i'll take a look here too.
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy. 🙏❤️🧘♂️🙌☯️🙌🧘♂️❤️🙏
This quote is absolutely classic:
“As a woman, I think with my vagina. Being driven by my hormones, when a sexy guy walks in, my ability to reason flies out the window. Women are different than men this way. The presence of hot babes in yoga pants doesn’t impair the discernment of men in the least. That’s why they don’t bother using beautiful women in ads—what good would it do?”
I loved that too!
For your interest, I came across this channel just this morning after he commented elsewhere …
• Attention Believers: Genesis contains 2 SEPARATE creation accounts! - Yeshua follower🙏🌎 - God’s Path -Road Less Taken
https://open.substack.com/pub/gods656j4/p/attention-believers-genesis-contains
"Yuval in saying that money is the most successful story ever told, and Yannis that democracy is a fig leaf for oligarchy"
Harari is right and he certainly knows Deut. 15:6. He goes as far as saying the religion is fake news, but I never heard him say that religion is the most successful story of mind control ever told.
Russel Brand plays the game according to the "imposed" dialectical rules. The biggest threat to freedom is Judaism, Islam and Christianity being only its by-products and poles of the dialectical game.
I agree with you, jamalh, that religion is the most successful psyop ever told. What's an example of Russell Brand using a dialectic? Do you mean his example of 10,000 villages instead of centralized control? I think the imposed dialectic on this is individuality vs. centralized authority. It ignores that individuals without community can only relate through centralized mechanisms. Skipping over the village--as libertarianism does, to my understanding--puts us back at the mercy of the oligarchs.
I was reacting to your comment to Russel Brand's question "What’s The Biggest Threat To Freedom - Islam Or Consumerism?" that you provided on a linked article. His recent conversion occurring in the context of a forced invasion of Muslims into the Western world is only adding fuel to the "eschatological" scenario planned by the Globalists.
Ah, you're commenting on a description of a linked article in a linked article. I have since put that into a Substack: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/sam-harris-and-the-war-on-burqas.
Sam Harris, at that time, had been using burqas and suicide bombers to show that religious ideology, particularly of Islam, was the source of all evil. Russell Brand's interview, which was in Feb of 2018, changed the question to, "What's the biggest threat to freedom, Islam or consumerism?"
In my video, I changed the question again to Ideology vs Capitalism, defined as ownership of the assets. Are Muslims being forced or paid to invade? I'm certain you're right that this is to add fuel to the eschatological scenario. But I'd still say that false ownership of the assets that back the money--the homes--is at the root of it. Yet I suspect you're right and the mind-control of religion came first in ancient history and continues to be a mind-trap that keeps us stuck.
I consider Russell Brand to be the sort of damaged goods that results naturally from someone of his genetic makeup and social background getting into the sort of circles of power that he had, and being turned against what is best in himself more and more until his persona shattered but it did so in a way favorable to escaping that fire, and ending up in the frying pan of controlled opposition without realizing it. It has almost happened to me many times.
I spent my whole young life after escaping a cult traipsing around like a Bohemian from one frying pan to another, one direction of career or study to another, one worldview to another, but never stayed anywhere too long because I kept one survival instinct strong: If it seems oppress my better judgement in any way, then it is my enemy. Perhaps Brand will come to realize that Trump's actions with regard to his Jewish/Israeli backers and his cabinet picks (in both terms), along with his prior associations, as well as his Operation Warped Sheep and now his Operation Stargate Panopticon are just not excusable as advanced chess strategy.
Or maybe he won't. But either way, what need is there to judge him beyond noting his degree of knowledge and discernment or lack thereof? It's not as if I have to go to Church of Russell Brand if I don't condemn his entire being. Nor does a failure to condemn his entire being amount to any form of acquiescence to his worldview, nor a condoning of anything about him. I also don't know if he raped anyone.
But I would only add this: Yoga has been a hotbed of rape accusations before that ever became a MeToo issue, so it doesn't to me indicate prima facie evidence against rapiness.
Fifth Column, I'm not sure if you recognize that you're doing the exact same thing that Mathew has done. Based on his superficial observations of Russell's public persona up to 2012, he labels me as gullible and naive for finding Russell's thoughts and ideas of value. He tells my interviewer I am gullible and naive, at best, complicit at worst.
I have 50 videos that respond to Russell's interviews, please look at just one of them and tell me what I 'fall for' or what his worldview is. In these videos of Yuval, his worldview is that we should have the 10,000 self-governing villages of Gandhi rather than centralized gov't and economies. Do you disagree with that?
Can you quote me something Russell has said between 2012 and 2023 that makes you consider him damaged goods? How much have you listened to him from between those times? From the 100+ hrs I've spent listening to his interviews, his mind is as sharp and discerning as anyone's I've ever found. If I could have found anyone who was making more sense than him, I would have listened to them instead.
What genetic makeup do you mean? Are you determined by your genes? You're making a lot of declarative statements without providing examples. It's not Russell you're judging, it's my discernment or lack thereof. I'm not going to concede that I'm not capable of thinking clearly without some details. How did Russell serve the Israeli agenda post-2012 and pre-sextroversy when he was, I think, brought to heel to serve Trump?
I'm sorry that I seemed to have such a position, Tereza. I don't hold the view of you that Mathew (of whom I don't know) does. I was not aware of your stance on Brand either. I'm just putting out my thoughts about him in a way that is "from the side" so to speak. I just analyze people in society from the optimum of my own information about them and and the world around us, and my own worldview. Oh, by the way, please don't be offput by it, but I have begun a series on Codex Theodosianus (have you heard of it?). I start off with my own thesis about Saul of Tarsus, and about the initial phases of the Christian movement, and then lay out the general idea of how that movement has worked then as a prelude to discussing how we ended up under laws that CT codified and has extended throughout the world through the expansion of Papal power and its offshoots. Tell me what you think? https://nonfifth.substack.com/p/codex-theodosianus