27 Comments
Aug 22Liked by Tereza Coraggio

Fantastic! Although you give me way too much credit.

Kudos for giving exposure to Kishi's and Japan's crimes to a wider audience who may have never been aware of them!

I loved the ending statement: "Hitler becomes the face of evil, whose crimes we can’t question, and Kishi a leader of the free world, whose crimes we don’t even know. What pieces of this puzzle are we missing?"

Answering this question will reveal the forces behind the millennium of oppression.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Fadi. Like your book, "the millennium of oppression" is well phrased. Since reading Laurent Guyenot's Anno Domini, it's been encouraging to realize it may only be a millennium. And so much of the carnage in just this last century. We're taught that empire will always be with us, and conquest has always been the norm. But yes, I think that concept had an origin and was rejected by all sane people. The US, made up of perhaps 99% immigrants, is 99% insane, unable to think past the cognitive dissonance. We are at a pinnacle of that concept, and the pinnacle is the turning point.

Thanks for this education and for coining the category (to my knowledge) of geoeconomics. I really struggled with how to categorize my book. Economics put it in with make-money-quick schemes. Politics or history wasn't quite right. Macroeconomics is academic posturing, from how it's used. But you give visibility into dark crevices of history like this one, that are important for understanding the way forward.

Expand full comment
Aug 22Liked by Tereza Coraggio

Hi Tereza.

Yeah. It is amazing how Abe has been purified in the eyes of the West through 'martyrdom'. Just about all of my Japanese friends despised him and his war-lord family business. One reason the last couple of emperors have been so adored by the public is because it was so apparent that the purely symbolic royalty have been trying their best to avoid being political pawns of the LDP.

But for pure bald-faced psychopathy, Kishida appears to be worse. Or maybe he is just a worse actor. Just a small, but revealing anecdote — maybe about a year ago, NHK-TV aired a short clip of Kishida in a typical photo-op shoot, being asked a question by an elementary school kid. A translation of the question - answer:

Kid — "Why did you want to become prime minister."

Kishida — "So that I could impose my will."

Not even good propaganda, not even the pretense of serving the people. Mired in one scandal of corruption after another, he is arrogant to the point that many Japanese are wondering why it took so long for him to announce he is stepping down.

As with most other countries , not only the LDP, but just any party or any individual attracted to a position of power in the corporate nation-state is corrupt by definition. Those who think Japan still manages to hum along in perfect harmony are either tourists, would-be tourists, or among theJapanese ruling class. It took me decades to find out, but beneath a carefully manufactured mask of exceptionalism, Japan inc. is every bit as dog-eat-dog as any Western counterpart.

Expand full comment
author

I certainly thought of you when writing this article, Steve. Glad to have your insight to the politics in Japan today with your decades of hard-won experience. There seems to be such a difference between Germany losing WWII and Japan. Germany, at least when the Nat'l Soc were in charge, seems to have been defensive. Japan was looking to colonize all of China, Korea and parts of Russia? Russia seems like the only enemy they had in common, and I don't know if that was true from the start.

Very astute, "any party or any individual attracted to a position of power in the corporate nation-state is corrupt by definition." Wise to keep in mind in the US. Thank you for your response and reading, Steve!

Expand full comment
Aug 22·edited Aug 23Liked by Tereza Coraggio

Hi again Tereza.

I only know the tip of the very dirty iceberg here in Japan, the compete absence of a Far Eastern equivalence of even a kangaroo court of Nuremberg being one example. I suppose Chinese were not deemed as worthy victims as European Jews and other caucasian undesirables.

Another current example ... despite the suicide of one of his bureaucrats who could not bear finishing his career as a professional "burial of scandals" , the relatively young governor of Hyogo pref. Saito (46), refuses to acknowledge the scandal, suicide, or his responsibility ... and is brushing off calls for further investigation so that he can carry on 'business' as usual.

Like the soon to be gone prime minister Kishida ... at least prior to Abe, bureaucrats or ministers up to the very top, when caught red-handed in a scandal, would resign. That is about the worst that can happen to a corporate CEO here as well. Now, they won't even do that. They dodge questions, blame, or shame as well as any snake-in-a-suit in the West.

Even the police chief who was in charge of the investigation during the Abe-assassination, has "resigned" only to take a job as a more well paid CEO of a company ... in Japanese ... "ame kudare" (descent from heaven) ... the Japanese equivalence of the musical chairs of revolving from influential but less lucrative public sector jobs to the more lucrative private sector ... yet another corrupt fascist face of what the ruling class means by "Public-Private Partnership".

Reminds me of Lahaina Police Chief John Pelletier, who was also the police chief during the Las Vegas massacre. I would not be surprised to see him "retire" to a CEO position of some 'security' firm in the near future ... and continuing to make us an offer that we can't refuse.

On that will shower up, and enjoy a hot summer drive in 'exotic orient'.

Cheers Tereza

Expand full comment
author

It reminds me of a K-drama I saw called Vincenzo about an Italian-Korean mafia guy. Of course, he was the good guy and the gov't and corporations were all in cahoots.

Perceptive observation on Pelletier. Wouldn't surprise me a bit. He's as corrupt as it gets. That was another strange synchronicity, researching the Vegas massacre and realizing the tie in to Khassogi.

Expand full comment
Aug 22·edited Aug 22Liked by Tereza Coraggio

So amazing...what a history lesson! Astonishing to realize - it has always been about power, control and destruction and bringing in some version of New World Order.

control>cruelty>culling - rinse and repeat...

And it reminds me that no one comes into power unless they are willing to kill on demand. The cruelty and depravity is soul-crushing, beyond belief and biological terrorism and the culling of humanity has a very long history.

Sorry for this indulgence, but I was recently reminded about the black-robed scythe-carrying grim reapers who would mist and spray under the doors and in the fields. Charlemagne c.800 was ordering the arrest of the tall, totally black-robed hooded figures who appeared, after lights and activity were seen in the sky.

The same thing happened at the time of the 'black death' c.1347 to 1350 throughout Europe.

The same black-robed hooded figures again appeared with tall handheld 'mast and spout' mist spraying apparatuses. I've always been fascinated by these characters and of course the alien angle - dark unseen forces that have always stalked and tortured humanity is what is inspiring me to dig in -

if I only had time to research the reapers...and write it up. Still drafting a cull fumigator stack...comparing it to Gates' plan to aerosolize the vaccines and a look back at the polio insanity and Staninger's research showing that the polio vax was aerosolized and contained SV40 - if you know about Mary's Monkey, et al. Forgive the indulgence...I just happen to be working on that stack right now...or, I should say agonizing about it...?

The carnage, cruelty and poisonings have been constant throughout history and the ghouls, psychopaths and archons have been coming at us and for us for millennia - and the basic script doesn't really change that much - except that the weapons become more imperceptible and insidious and the culling more encompassing. It is beyond survival of the fittest - it is the power of the most vicious...they become the controllers of this realm.

WTH is wrong with this realm of existence? I think I have a clue...there really are monsters under the bed...

And yes, we are missing so many pieces of the puzzle of human history...and so many "unseen" forces at work...

It's very hard - and dangerous - to be human...

Hats off to Fadi Lama...and to you, Tereza, for sharing this astonishing information...and Julius...and all of your fabulous scribes...thank you all...so enlightening.

Expand full comment
author

Our Vulcan Mind Meld is still working, Pasheen. My current sci-fi read is called Scythe and I picked it up because I think the OG archons transmuted from the Hyksos (foreign rulers) in Egypt to the Royal Scyths including Constantine and the Papacy. The figure of the Grim Reaper carrying the scythe goes back to ancient Greek mythology. The Scythians were nomadic invaders on horseback. They used a long curved blade. Imagine the power of wielding a scythe from horseback against peasants.

And yes, as I wrote on your cull fumigator piece, the Manchukuo experiments in using fiber to keep a virus alive to get to the human target made me think of the geoengineered fibers in our nano-aluminum clouds.

Well said that it's the power of the most vicious. And I think that will always be true as long as power over others is centralized in money, ideology and violence. But how quick that could change if there was an alternative! Knowing how much is stacked against us is a testimony to the resilience and kindness of ordinary people. We would never have survived other wise.

Expand full comment

Preliminary comment - some of this read like a dystopian science fiction novel ...

In 1914 – yes, 1914, 108 years ago - John Griffith Chaney (aka Jack London) wrote a book called “Strength of the Strong”.

John Griffith Chaney [1876 – 1916] is described as an American novelist, journalist and social activist, an innovator in the genre that would become known as science fiction.

Jack London was also a renowned eugenicist. His bio talks about his views on Atheism, Socialism, Race and Eugenics. He is quoted as writing "I believe the future belongs to eugenics, and will be determined by the practice of eugenics." He supported the forced sterilization of “criminals” or those deemed “feeble-minded”. [Sounds a bit like Noah Yuval Harari et al].

In “The Strength of the Strong” (1914), London was particularly keen to narrate how he desired the extermination of the entire Chinese race.

From the Chapter “The Unparalleled Invasion” (Pp 91+):

“But on May 1, 1976 [remember, London is writing futuristically in 1914], had the reader been in the imperial city of Peking, with its then population of eleven millions, he would have witnessed a curious sight. He would have seen the streets filled with the chattering yellow populace, every queued head tilted back, every slant eye turned skyward. And high up in the blue he would have beheld a tiny dot of black, which, because of its orderly evolutions, he would have identified as an airship. From this airship, as it curved its flight back and forth over the city, fell missiles-strange, harmless missiles, tubes of fragile glass that shattered into thousands of fragments on the streets and house-tops. But there was nothing deadly about these tubes of glass. Nothing happened. There were no explosions. It is true, several Chinese were killed by the tubes dropping on their heads from so enormous a height; but what were. three Chinese against an excess birth rate of twenty millions? One tube struck perpendicularly in a fish pond in a garden and was not broken. It was dragged ashore by the master of the house. He did not dare to open it, but, accompanied by his friends, and surrounded by an ever-increasing crowd, he carried the mysterious tube to the magistrate of the district. The latter was a brave man. With all eyes upon him, he shattered the tube with a blow from his brass-bowled pipe. Nothing happened. Of those who were very near, one or two thought they saw some mosquitos fly out. That was all. The crowd set up a great laugh and dispersed.

As Peking was bombarded by glass tubes, so was all China. The tiny airships, dispatched from the warships, contained but two men each, and over all cities, towns, and villages they wheeled and curved, one man directing the ship, the other man throwing over the glass tubes.

Had the reader again been in Peking, six weeks later, he would have looked in vain for the eleven million inhabitants. Some few of them he would have found, a few hundred thousand, perhaps, their carcasses festering in the houses and in the deserted streets, and piled high on the abandoned death wagons. But for the rest he would have had to seek along the highways and byways of the Empire. And not all would he have found fleeing from plague-stricken Peking, for behind them, by hundreds of thousands of unburied corpses by the wayside, he could have marked their flight. <b>And as it was with Peking, so was it with all the cities, towns, and villages of the Empire. The plague smote them all.</b> Nor was it one plague, nor two plagues; it was a score of plagues. Every virulent form of infectious death stalked through the land. Too late the Chinese government apprehended the meaning of the colossal preparations, the marshalling of the world hosts, the flights of the tiny airships, and the rain of the tubes of glass. The proclamations of the government were vain. They could not stop the eleven million plague-stricken wretches, fleeing from the one city of Peking to spread disease through all the land. The physicians and health officers died at their posts; and death, the all-conqueror, rode over the decrees of the Emperor and Li Tang Fwung. It rode over them as well, for Li Tang Fwung died in the second week, and the Emperor, hidden away in the Summer Palace, died in the fourth week.”

Had there been one plague, China might have coped with it. But from a score of plagues no creature was immune. The man who escaped smallpox went down before scarlet fever. The man who was immune to yellow fever was carried away by cholera; and if he were immune to that, too, the Black Death, which was the bubonic plague, swept him away. For it was these bacteria, and germs, and microbes, and bacilli, cultured in the laboratories of the West, that had come down upon China in the rain of glass."

[End of quoted passage]

Such were the musings of a eugenicist named John Griffith Chaney (aka Jack London) in 1914. That is SOME predictive programming!

Expand full comment
Aug 23Liked by Tereza Coraggio

Damn, how ignorant we are!

I was a fan of Jack London, I had absolutely no idea what kind of person he was. Just now I checked, and yep all you wrote here is correct!

Interesting, that he was a socialist, supremacist racist, and it seems a plagiarist too.

Thank you!

Expand full comment
author

I'm with you, Fadi. I loved The Call of the Wild. My daughter lives by Jack London Square in Oakland. I guess a supremacist racist can still live on in the wokest city in the world.

Expand full comment
Aug 22Liked by Tereza Coraggio

Well then. Thanks for all the nuanced nuggets of info and analysis. I'd offer one of my Driftwood Art messages, entitled "Terrorist Babies" in response. "Without Exception, Every Human Cousin Starts As an Infant: Every Single God-Fearing Christian; Every Allah-Loving Muslim; Every Torah-Toting Jew; Every Non-Attached Buddhist; Every Reincarnated Hindi; Every Wild Wiccan; Every Godless Atheist; Every Single Terrorist, & So on & So Forth, Establishing a Ubiquitous, Indisputable Biosocial Context the Dire Daily Reality of Which Ought to Require All Inquisitive Minds, With the Utmost Urgency & Diligence, to Inquire, 'What Would Need to Happen to Induce the Far-Flung Members of Our Fractious, Factional Clan to Treat Each Other With Amicable Regard & Mutual Respect?'”

I'd also point out that Alfred McCoy has compiled and written brilliantly about the intersection of black-market contraband and empire in his Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, which the boys in Langley lionize here: <https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp75b00380r000600010033-3>.

I have written about poppies as well, more or less: <https://hickeyj.substack.com/i/147321334/empowered-political-forayscapitalism-on-drugs-the-political-economy-of-contraband-from-heroin-to-ritalin-and-beyond-continued>. My installment on the First and Second Opium Wars and more is coming up next issue. Here's how Part Three(of six or so) ended. "At the very least, when ‘law-enforcement’ regulations collide with our lives, we ought to begin to introduce this evidence of our forebears’ pathways into the social dialog about our encounters with the law. In so doing, we establish a basis for a transformation of this entire realm, arguably a prospect that would immeasurably improve the human condition."

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for reading, Jim. I might rephrase the question in your first paragraph: "What has happened to make humans regard their farflung cousins with fear and contempt?" I don't know that this is natural or if it's been induced by those ideologies, since even atheists hold onto the superiority of religion: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-dogma-of-atheism.

And I wonder if the addictive properties of poppies is proportionate to the aversion to life as we know it. In the fictional novel, the opium creates a numbness from the nightmare of the violence she's inflicted. The Rat Park Experiment suggests the same. Maybe our desire for connection and Oneness is so strong that it finds a way, even destructive, but would step back into a ceremonial role in a fulfilling world.

Looking forward to your episode on the Opium Wars.

Expand full comment

My main comment:

Missing pieces … you can say THAT again! I’ll take all this on board but after reading about the ‘Babies on Bayonets’ (The Bryce Report) and other atrocity propaganda from both WWI and WWII (for example, by Sefton Delmer), I am not giving this a tick until I can convince myself.

But what I really wanted to say is that I was going to message you to ask what you thought would be the best exposé of your book, and I found just what I was looking for in your interview with Jeff J Brown. Thanks for the back link.

See my comment here FWIW …

https://rumble.com/v5a5dfx-unspeakable-meme-ep-34-zach-logos-revealed.html#comment-453212052

Postscript – it would be fascinating to get Emanuel Pastreich’s thought on this.

The Assassination of Archduke Shinzo Abe - When the Globalists Crossed the Rubicon - Emanuel Pastreich

https://emanuelprez.substack.com/p/the-assassination-of-archduke-shinzo-faf

Emanuel is promoted by Anthony James Hall here …

https://anthonyjhall.substack.com/p/tough-love-from-emmanuel-pastreich

Window to Emanuel’s substack:

https://emanuelprez.substack.com/p/the-tragedy-of-japan

Post-postscript:

Now excuse me while I get on and finish my Mention of Jeff’s ‘China Rising’ … and I can feel a Haruki Murakami coming on (down the track).

Expand full comment
author

I just posted a comment on the Unspeakable Meme: https://rumble.com/v5a5dfx-unspeakable-meme-ep-34-zach-logos-revealed.html#comment-453503109.

Thanks again, Julius.

Expand full comment
author

I would be really glad for you to do that verification, Julius. Yes, the surgical atrocities included removing arms and reversing them, which reminded me of one of the 'holocaust' survivors talking about reversed hands. But the bioterrorism lab (which should be the term since no bioweapon can ever be used for defense) seemed very credible along with the immunity. And I'm still thinking there's a clear distinction between the National Socialists and the ZioNazis, who may well have engaged in human experimentation and certainly got immunity too.

I'm very curious about how Japan became part of the war, since their interests don't seem at all aligned with Germany. Any insight to that?

And THANK YOU for that kind referral to Khanverse. I do think we're working towards the same goal. I'll also post some thoughts there when I've finished watching.

Yes, Emanuel has sometimes posted here and we've been in communication. I think we met on Matt Ehret's stack. Cynthia cites his article on Abe. I'll look more into it.

And thanks for the mention of Jeff's China Rising!

Expand full comment
Aug 22·edited Aug 22Liked by Tereza Coraggio

If you were instructed by , Poppy Wars & Manchukuo Monsters, then the book below will also be very enlightening .

It connects China, CIA, MI6, OSS, SOE, Banksters, The Opium Trade, Triads, Mafia colusion et al and the process is still alive today.

One Nation under Blackmail by Whitney Webb.

https://archive.org/details/one-nation-under-blackmail-vol-1-2-whitney-alyse-webb_202401/page/n27/mode/2up?view=theater

Expand full comment
author

Agreed, David! I loved One Nation Under Blackmail, although I read Vol 2 first and still need to read Vol 1. I will do an episode on it when I have. Very instructional and a masterful work of journalism.

Expand full comment

hola tereza.

really great summary of that part of history that really is even more memory-holed than the 'wests' two world wars. truly excellent and an important read. funny, the japanese bioweaponeers move to the usa and the german rocket weaoneaers move to the usa? hmmmm.

and your succinct summary of the triad: london, the usa and vatican. and with the vatican, have you seen the movies of the pope kissing the hand of all the rothschilds, men and women?

as i've been looking at the role of 'morality' as the agency of destruction, i found myself taking exception to "There are no questions of morality unless you lose, and perhaps not even then." i took this in likely a different way than i think you intended it.

I would, and do argue, that the people leading and doing the destruction are in fact operating from morality. Or they wouldn't have been doing that. In this case the morality related to the other as not human and the science(tm) and the wealth are moral justifications.

for example, your citations of the popes are in fact 'moral' justifications for the action of the 'colonising' barbarians. death, theft and slavery all morally sanctioned.

at its core, all moralities are the method to separate the human from his/her heart by putting the morality first. even so-called 'good' moral codes or 'ethics' do this. their acceptance is embraced because it is illogical to trust the human with all its destructive tendencies. hmmmm. a bit of a chicken and egg problem. is the source of schismogenesis moral codes and those moral codes the source of schismogenesis?

where does 'trust your self' fit in? it doesn't. trust everything, everyone, everything else first: the science(tm), religion(tm), logic(tm), the law(tm), the PhDs(tm). hmmmmm.

this is an important read. more dots connected and the house of cards continues to reveal its inherent un-sustainability. thank you for the dig and i loved the synchronicity that helped this along.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Guy. Yes, that triad from Frances felt so immediately true, it was absorbed into my worldview. That's why those whose analysis stops with the US neocons seem like a limited hangout--to whom do they answer? And I have seen the popes kissing the Rothschilds rings, but whose rings do the Rothschilds kiss? I think Frances may be right that they're only the money managers for more layers, maybe those she calls the Black Nobility.

I do agree with you completely on the morality. That's why I think the ideology is so important and has to come first. I think humans have a very hard time doing immoral things. As you say, "'colonising' barbarians. death, theft and slavery all morally sanctioned." The morality that's intuitive is not doing to someone else what would be wrong for them to do to you. I think that's trusting yourself. But all the codification is obfuscation that justifies immoral acts.

Thank you for reading and getting that important point.

Expand full comment
Aug 23Liked by Tereza Coraggio

Fully agree that the criminals truly believe in their "morality", two confirmations:

Kipling's" "White man's burden"

John Robert Seeley: "the special fitness of the English to rule over other people"

Expand full comment
Aug 23·edited Aug 23Liked by Tereza Coraggio

yes. morality is the gateway 'drug', the big permission slip to do anything. it is the deferral of personal autonomy and responsibility to an agency outside of our selves — the moralist/morals chosen. it was good to see those references again!

Expand full comment

Well I’ll be! Very enlightening. As soon as I read the years, I was wondering what the Chinese were doing WW2. I wish I could read all this material. Glad to have you summarise it for me.

This tho, this right here: “Imperialism vs Sovereignty, the only real battle there is.” - this rings down to the core.

Expand full comment
author

Just quoted you quoting me in the one I just posted. Thanks, Tonika.

Expand full comment
Aug 23Liked by Tereza Coraggio

Excellent the parallels you noted between the enabling triad of the Crusades and of the Empire today.

Expand full comment
Aug 22Liked by Tereza Coraggio

I have only just started reading it and it makes my mind struggle with all the interlinking connections and players. Then to top it off the amount of foot notes to corroborate what she has asserted.

Expand full comment
author

Glad I'm not the only one who struggled with that! Yes, I've titled my draft article Whitney's Web for all those interlinking connections and players. I had to trap myself on a plane with no other reading material to focus and not get distracted. I see it as meta-journalism for pulling together all of that research into one coherent narrative.

Expand full comment