I'm glad that you brought up this info, and I know noosfera will be also. I quoted Riley (edward slavesquat) back when I was doing episodes on Ukraine but I need to read more of him. Thanks for making these points. I don't know what it means in terms of a strategy but it's important to understand what's really going on. Would you say that Sergei Glazyev is also part of that?
I know slavsquat has said that within Russia there's been a fight between the nationalists and the current administration which is full of swamp things that love the WHO, the west banking systems, and so on.
Even this war doesn't make sense. Last year Russia supposedly targeted key electric infrastructure in Ukraine. I didn't hear a peep on how they had power issues.
It feels like an Orwellian acted war to me, and that's why all the pro Russia fanboys were surprised at first, because it's clearly a battle that Russia could easily win... But they keep dragging dragging dragging... And of course they blame the west as if the west has any power to actually defeat Russia 😂
Really great post Tereza. Isn't it interesting how truly complex things are when you examine them up close? There have been many dimensions to how globalism was planned and implemented. This type of detail can be traced back to the end of the Roman Empire.
Thank you, Nefahotep. Some of these I record speaking and others I write first and read, and they work best in the format I do them in originally. One of these days I'll figure out how to embed clips so it's not just me reading but this one definitely worked better in text, so you can compare the quotes. It does get VERY complex and I think Matt and James are a good example of the nuance. And yes, my book traces back 3500 yrs to the related inventions of coinage and democracy. If I'm remembering, your research goes back just as far or farther.
Yes it does. There are some ancient bloodlines that are involved in ALL this stuff. Here are some links (if you have time to check them out) I'll be posting a lot more when I can.
I have a feeling there's a correspondence here between your work and his. And without clicking the link yet, just the title Sabbatean Billionaires may confirm that.
Tereza, I just finished valley of the dollars. So your plan pulls the rug out from under THEM. Is this correct thinking? And thank you for the M& M's definition, I heard it spoke of but didn't know what it was. You make economics easy and fun minus all the reveal of corruption. Have a nice weekend
Thanks so much, Helene! Yes, it removes the vampire squid's teeth from our neck. It leaves them all the money they've amassed but takes away their ability to buy our private or community assets, or own them for free while we pay them for the favor of using them.
Without our labor and assets backing their money, we can allow the dollar to fall while protecting ourselves and our communities.
I am glad you have a place to go to get a reprieve. They are definitely making weather off the east coast here. How can they hold back the weather that usually comes from the west??? Its only once and a while under natural weather that we get weather from the east. So is it the counties that would start to implement your caret system? I was thinking our county comptroller should read your book because I think their retirement investments are losing money. This is what the report said, "Overall, our funds experienced unrealized losses for the year though they did outperform their benchmarks" Doesn't that me they lost money but not as bad as expected?? All I can think about is Detroit and Pennies from Kevin, what a killer title!:)
Yes, it's been healing to see sun and my daughter, although I'm frog-sitting at the moment while she's gone just for the sun.
I like the county level because it's contiguous and includes urban and rural land. However gov'ts at all levels have been usurped and twisted, and counties vary from a million people to a few thousand. When you get to 'the right size for sovereignty' I look at different population sizes for different functions. I think we need new names for similar population sizes and decisions pushed down to the lowest level possible.
I wouldn't have anyone in charge of any more discretionary spending of carets than anyone else, so they couldn't be corrupted. Maybe I have a certain monthly amount to spend towards neighborhood improvements, or upgrading healthcare options in my hamlet. No council decides that for me. People make proposals and I vote my carets with no commitment longer than a year, perhaps.
And don't forget...One Weather. Its bad here in North Fl. Are you sure about Matt's day job? I thought I read, you write a paper and you can become a senior fellow at the American university in Moscow. Also he has never been to Moscow, I just heard Matt say that. James theory is very hidden if its true, because I have not heard or seen any inkling of it. And it would be a frightful thing if true. Have you heard of Vanessa Beeley? She's a UK journalist in Syria and has been living there for 12 yrs if I remember correctly. Anyway I heard her talk with Marwa Osman from Lebanon. Marwa is super sharp. Its good to get their perspective on the world from their angle. So I am interested in what these middle eastern journalists have to say these days about the US and Russia and China. I disagree with James that Putin was a war monger, he would not have waited 8 years to intervene in Ukraine. As far as I understand Putin rescued Syria from the US white helmets. Putin also sent military to help Turkey after the quake, I know that for sure as I saw videos. I did not hear the US send any help. Did you hear of the US sending help? I understand that you have an economic plan, but I have to tell you when you talk about working with your hands, the snowflakes will not want any part of it. I myself am a do it your self-er, so I'm on board, but the rest would probably rather be reset. You might want to modify the plan a little.
Oh you may be right about that! Maybe Senior Fellow isn't a paid position at all. There I go spreading misinformation, glad that I have you to keep me honest ;-)
I have read Vanessa Beeley and like her perspective. I agree with you that Putin is not a warmonger and make that point in some of my early episodes on Ukraine: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/putin-peace-petrodollar-pain. In the comments I quote from Putin's speech that shows, I think, he would have avoided war if there had been an option.
Yes on One Weather. I'm at my daughter's right now because I was getting the White Sky Blues. I think I need to do another episode with that title. Yes, things are bad.
With my plan, there's no interference with the way things are other than taking the ability to create new money away from the bankers and using it to distribute dividends to the local population. So nothing that's already working is taken away, no corporate jobs, no consumer choices. It only adds the money to repay mortgages and student debt to the local economy. So if you distribute ^100 per person per month that can only be spent on locally produced food, for every 10,000 people you just created a million carets of new jobs per month. Ditto for education, home improvement and wellcare. It's great that the snowflakes want no part of it, that leaves more to go around for those who do want to work with their hands ... and their hearts.
Like you said we should not put our trust in people as hero's but as fellow citizens of the world. I read through the Chinese document James starts off his video with and I notice a lot of what Matt Ehret says is in the document. Also I try to put myself in the position of the person speaking in order to understand his words better. It would be taking the words out of context not knowing the situation the speaker is coming from. I know I am new to this world understanding, so all I can do is lean toward a position as opposed to it being my dogma so to speak. I mean look how we and others were and are still duped by Mal*ne. Also consider double speak, so when Russia and China talk of a world order, it is not the same as New World Order that Bush Senior put out. There are many differences in this document than what James infers. I did not see RESET of any kind or WEF mentioned. He would serve his audience better with facts instead of sensationalism imo. Don't get me wrong the "Sides" are wrong to put their trust in the WHO to investigate Covid 19 origins. Which is discussed in the document. Hopefully the Sides realize that now, as the document is over a year old. So the key to all this is the actions taken by a person or nation have to match the words (the true meaning of) that are spoken by that person or on behave of a nation. That's the only way to make a judgement call. I thought it was a good document and he did not do anyone justice by his exploitation imo.
I forget if I mentioned this in the episode but it should be kept in mind that Matt's day job is as a professor at the American University of Moscow. That's not a hidden conflict of interest but it does need to be considered for anything he says about Russia. What he makes as a journalist or selling books is a side hustle, as the kids say, but his bread and butter is Russia. Could he criticize Putin and still keep his job? I don't know.
James, on the other hand, is entirely supported by viewer subs. That doesn't make him right but it does mean he doesn't have a vested interest. In the end, if Matt is right that the multipolar global economy will be good for everyone, there's really nothing to do because it's coming no matter what (imho). But if James is right that the Russia-China alliance is phase two of the Reset, adding One Money to One Health, then our only protection is a plan to decentralize, again imho. That's the only reason I think it matters who's right.
I am slowly getting to know about Ehrett. There is always some new info tucked in the comment sections. I know why James went to Japan, but why he is still there is a mystery to me.
I don't remember which epsode it was, but he said that he went there as an Assistant Language Teacher (ALT). I am pretty sure.
Native English speakers are in high demand in public schools to help local teachers of English in English language classes mostly on pronunciation. There are also many private English language schools for adults. They recruit Native English speakers from US, Canada, Australia ...
I listened to most of Corbett's ruse video, he is not methodical and organized like you or Matt. His source names were difficult to spot (he goes so quick) and some sources were not dated at all. I like to see those things because they add validity to the point of view. All the dirt comes out in the wash, so we will all know the truth sooner or later:)
Hi, Helene. Yes, Corbett does go fast and does his videos to be catchy but he does take sourcing his material seriously. It is trickier, though, trying to figure out which thing he says in a video connects to the link below. I commend you for delving in to that. I still take it as an open question to whether Putin is acting on behalf of the WEF. There's a lot to consider on both sides and, in the end, isn't something we can do anything about one way or the other. I'm glad you're keeping these journalists honest, including me!
Good, so 1st I looked for each document online, so I could print at least one out as I don't know how to split a screen to compare. I found the China- Russian one straight away, but no luck on the Canadian-US one. As I was comparing them word for word on the 3rd page of the printed doc. I noticed the Eurasian Belt and Road and was like WOA. Something is not right, Biden and Trudeau would never be talking about that so.... I stopped comparing at that point and wanted to let you know asap, because I knew you would check it out thoroughly. Let me know if there is any news fit to print:)
Thanks for that thorough work, Helene. I didn't listen as carefully as you but my impression is that Corbett wasn't saying Canada and Russia had the same document. He was making a rhetorical point by first reading it as IF it came from Trudeau, where everyone's nodding along and saying, of course, we knew it, he's in the WEF's pocket.
And then he does that little glitch in the middle where he makes the switch and reveals it's been a Russian document all along. As I wrote, "But halfway through he reveals the ruse—everything that’s supposedly written by Trudeau is actually from Putin detailing his agenda in line with the Great Reset."
It's confusing to follow because of that, and the title, but I believe that he wants to catch out people--maybe like Ehret in Montreal--who would be willing to believe it about Trudeau but unwilling to believe it about Putin, even with the same evidence. Does that make sense?
Hi Tereza, I viewed James Corbett’s episode titled SHOCKING Document Reveals Trudeau's REAL Plan! So it looks to me that the document was actually a Russian-China Document put out by China Aerospace Studies Institute. It came right up when I googled it. Here is a link to the pdf: https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/CASI/documents/Translations/2022-02-04%20China%20Russia%20joint%20statement%20International%20Relations%20Entering%20a%20New%20Era.pdf Notice how James skips the paragraph at time 9:44-10:30 where it talks about the EAEU and the belt and road initiative. I also could not find a US- Canadian joint statement for that date because it never happened. Let me know if you find out anything different. PS: that Matt Ehret link was a good one. I missed it last year, because I didn't know about him at the time. I swear I was introduced to him by you. Thanks for connecting the world of Truth Seekers.
I better watch the whole thing. I missed the joke part. lol I just thought he was saying that both joint statements said the same thing and were supposedly real.
I'm not sure if I understand. Do you mean that you agree with Matt that we do need symmetrical power of large alliances with China and Russia to push back against the WEF? Or that YOU are the globalist that wants all power in one macropole, nyaahaha! Finally, we know who's behind all the machinations. It's Bull Dog!
I don't think there's anything I can say or do that won't offend you, noosfera. I have no idea why your Substack was deleted and neither do you. Is it because of your content on the Russian Great Reset or because other Substackers filed complaints about posting multiple blog-length comments and insulting them on their sites?
On the link you posted, Matt Ehret seemed very receptive to the information you sent to his email, after he couldn't get it from your site. After three prompts the same day from you, he writes, "Racing against deadlines and interview. Your email is received and appreciated. I'm tracking the cybernetics cult in Russia and China since the 1950s which makes your links high value for me. Thank you." If your motivation is to get the information out, that seems like a good thing. Yet you say he "doesn't want to read: he wants to know about one of my comments."
James Corbett agrees with you that Putin is on board with the Great Reset. But that's not enough for you. You recommend Riley Waggaman to me, but now you call him softened. I'm not sure how you wanted me to refer to you in citing you on my post but I won't make that mistake again.
China and Russia (and Brazil and India) a part of the great reset.
That's most of BRICS.
They all went along with the big pharma COVID lockdowns.
They both promoted new shots that never worked before on Corona viruses.
(And before you pretend they're safe go here and look at the mess Russia got itself into
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/ )
They still pretend like the last 3 years was worth what was done.
Destruction of the medical system, geared to focus on a freaking flu and delaying treatments for other issues.
And still to this day, Russia and China (and the others) promote the WHO and their new crazy authoritarian amendments.
Multi polar my ass.
I'm glad that you brought up this info, and I know noosfera will be also. I quoted Riley (edward slavesquat) back when I was doing episodes on Ukraine but I need to read more of him. Thanks for making these points. I don't know what it means in terms of a strategy but it's important to understand what's really going on. Would you say that Sergei Glazyev is also part of that?
No clue about Glazyev being in on it or not.
I know slavsquat has said that within Russia there's been a fight between the nationalists and the current administration which is full of swamp things that love the WHO, the west banking systems, and so on.
Even this war doesn't make sense. Last year Russia supposedly targeted key electric infrastructure in Ukraine. I didn't hear a peep on how they had power issues.
It feels like an Orwellian acted war to me, and that's why all the pro Russia fanboys were surprised at first, because it's clearly a battle that Russia could easily win... But they keep dragging dragging dragging... And of course they blame the west as if the west has any power to actually defeat Russia 😂
It is invigorating to see these historical dandelion seeds contextualised like this.
Really great post Tereza. Isn't it interesting how truly complex things are when you examine them up close? There have been many dimensions to how globalism was planned and implemented. This type of detail can be traced back to the end of the Roman Empire.
Thank you, Nefahotep. Some of these I record speaking and others I write first and read, and they work best in the format I do them in originally. One of these days I'll figure out how to embed clips so it's not just me reading but this one definitely worked better in text, so you can compare the quotes. It does get VERY complex and I think Matt and James are a good example of the nuance. And yes, my book traces back 3500 yrs to the related inventions of coinage and democracy. If I'm remembering, your research goes back just as far or farther.
Yes it does. There are some ancient bloodlines that are involved in ALL this stuff. Here are some links (if you have time to check them out) I'll be posting a lot more when I can.
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/sabbatean-billionaires-and-their
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/sabbatean-frankist-billionaires-who
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/dragon-court-a-history-of-symbolism
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/dragon-court-and-the-order-of-the
The above links are related to the Dragon Bloodlines and the Order of the Garter (Royalty)
Another aspect of the discussion on the power structure based on Arbitrary Hierarchy is the Nature of Individual Sovereignty:
(I may have shared this with you before)
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/individualized-sovereignty-and-political
I'll check them out when I get a chance. I don't know if you saw my episode that talked about Isaac Middle's hypotheses in Down the Wombat Hole? https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/what-a-smoke-and-wombat-holes
I have a feeling there's a correspondence here between your work and his. And without clicking the link yet, just the title Sabbatean Billionaires may confirm that.
Tereza, I just finished valley of the dollars. So your plan pulls the rug out from under THEM. Is this correct thinking? And thank you for the M& M's definition, I heard it spoke of but didn't know what it was. You make economics easy and fun minus all the reveal of corruption. Have a nice weekend
Thanks so much, Helene! Yes, it removes the vampire squid's teeth from our neck. It leaves them all the money they've amassed but takes away their ability to buy our private or community assets, or own them for free while we pay them for the favor of using them.
Without our labor and assets backing their money, we can allow the dollar to fall while protecting ourselves and our communities.
Good perceptions and progress, economic pilgrim!
I am glad you have a place to go to get a reprieve. They are definitely making weather off the east coast here. How can they hold back the weather that usually comes from the west??? Its only once and a while under natural weather that we get weather from the east. So is it the counties that would start to implement your caret system? I was thinking our county comptroller should read your book because I think their retirement investments are losing money. This is what the report said, "Overall, our funds experienced unrealized losses for the year though they did outperform their benchmarks" Doesn't that me they lost money but not as bad as expected?? All I can think about is Detroit and Pennies from Kevin, what a killer title!:)
Yes, it's been healing to see sun and my daughter, although I'm frog-sitting at the moment while she's gone just for the sun.
I like the county level because it's contiguous and includes urban and rural land. However gov'ts at all levels have been usurped and twisted, and counties vary from a million people to a few thousand. When you get to 'the right size for sovereignty' I look at different population sizes for different functions. I think we need new names for similar population sizes and decisions pushed down to the lowest level possible.
I wouldn't have anyone in charge of any more discretionary spending of carets than anyone else, so they couldn't be corrupted. Maybe I have a certain monthly amount to spend towards neighborhood improvements, or upgrading healthcare options in my hamlet. No council decides that for me. People make proposals and I vote my carets with no commitment longer than a year, perhaps.
Thanks for appreciating my titles ;-)
And don't forget...One Weather. Its bad here in North Fl. Are you sure about Matt's day job? I thought I read, you write a paper and you can become a senior fellow at the American university in Moscow. Also he has never been to Moscow, I just heard Matt say that. James theory is very hidden if its true, because I have not heard or seen any inkling of it. And it would be a frightful thing if true. Have you heard of Vanessa Beeley? She's a UK journalist in Syria and has been living there for 12 yrs if I remember correctly. Anyway I heard her talk with Marwa Osman from Lebanon. Marwa is super sharp. Its good to get their perspective on the world from their angle. So I am interested in what these middle eastern journalists have to say these days about the US and Russia and China. I disagree with James that Putin was a war monger, he would not have waited 8 years to intervene in Ukraine. As far as I understand Putin rescued Syria from the US white helmets. Putin also sent military to help Turkey after the quake, I know that for sure as I saw videos. I did not hear the US send any help. Did you hear of the US sending help? I understand that you have an economic plan, but I have to tell you when you talk about working with your hands, the snowflakes will not want any part of it. I myself am a do it your self-er, so I'm on board, but the rest would probably rather be reset. You might want to modify the plan a little.
Oh you may be right about that! Maybe Senior Fellow isn't a paid position at all. There I go spreading misinformation, glad that I have you to keep me honest ;-)
I have read Vanessa Beeley and like her perspective. I agree with you that Putin is not a warmonger and make that point in some of my early episodes on Ukraine: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/putin-peace-petrodollar-pain. In the comments I quote from Putin's speech that shows, I think, he would have avoided war if there had been an option.
Yes on One Weather. I'm at my daughter's right now because I was getting the White Sky Blues. I think I need to do another episode with that title. Yes, things are bad.
With my plan, there's no interference with the way things are other than taking the ability to create new money away from the bankers and using it to distribute dividends to the local population. So nothing that's already working is taken away, no corporate jobs, no consumer choices. It only adds the money to repay mortgages and student debt to the local economy. So if you distribute ^100 per person per month that can only be spent on locally produced food, for every 10,000 people you just created a million carets of new jobs per month. Ditto for education, home improvement and wellcare. It's great that the snowflakes want no part of it, that leaves more to go around for those who do want to work with their hands ... and their hearts.
Like you said we should not put our trust in people as hero's but as fellow citizens of the world. I read through the Chinese document James starts off his video with and I notice a lot of what Matt Ehret says is in the document. Also I try to put myself in the position of the person speaking in order to understand his words better. It would be taking the words out of context not knowing the situation the speaker is coming from. I know I am new to this world understanding, so all I can do is lean toward a position as opposed to it being my dogma so to speak. I mean look how we and others were and are still duped by Mal*ne. Also consider double speak, so when Russia and China talk of a world order, it is not the same as New World Order that Bush Senior put out. There are many differences in this document than what James infers. I did not see RESET of any kind or WEF mentioned. He would serve his audience better with facts instead of sensationalism imo. Don't get me wrong the "Sides" are wrong to put their trust in the WHO to investigate Covid 19 origins. Which is discussed in the document. Hopefully the Sides realize that now, as the document is over a year old. So the key to all this is the actions taken by a person or nation have to match the words (the true meaning of) that are spoken by that person or on behave of a nation. That's the only way to make a judgement call. I thought it was a good document and he did not do anyone justice by his exploitation imo.
I forget if I mentioned this in the episode but it should be kept in mind that Matt's day job is as a professor at the American University of Moscow. That's not a hidden conflict of interest but it does need to be considered for anything he says about Russia. What he makes as a journalist or selling books is a side hustle, as the kids say, but his bread and butter is Russia. Could he criticize Putin and still keep his job? I don't know.
James, on the other hand, is entirely supported by viewer subs. That doesn't make him right but it does mean he doesn't have a vested interest. In the end, if Matt is right that the multipolar global economy will be good for everyone, there's really nothing to do because it's coming no matter what (imho). But if James is right that the Russia-China alliance is phase two of the Reset, adding One Money to One Health, then our only protection is a plan to decentralize, again imho. That's the only reason I think it matters who's right.
I am slowly getting to know about Ehrett. There is always some new info tucked in the comment sections. I know why James went to Japan, but why he is still there is a mystery to me.
Oh I don't know this history, why did James go to Japan?
I don't remember which epsode it was, but he said that he went there as an Assistant Language Teacher (ALT). I am pretty sure.
Native English speakers are in high demand in public schools to help local teachers of English in English language classes mostly on pronunciation. There are also many private English language schools for adults. They recruit Native English speakers from US, Canada, Australia ...
Oh interesting! That's what Steven Martin, who comments here, also does in Japan. I've wished those two could meet.
I listened to most of Corbett's ruse video, he is not methodical and organized like you or Matt. His source names were difficult to spot (he goes so quick) and some sources were not dated at all. I like to see those things because they add validity to the point of view. All the dirt comes out in the wash, so we will all know the truth sooner or later:)
Hi, Helene. Yes, Corbett does go fast and does his videos to be catchy but he does take sourcing his material seriously. It is trickier, though, trying to figure out which thing he says in a video connects to the link below. I commend you for delving in to that. I still take it as an open question to whether Putin is acting on behalf of the WEF. There's a lot to consider on both sides and, in the end, isn't something we can do anything about one way or the other. I'm glad you're keeping these journalists honest, including me!
Good, so 1st I looked for each document online, so I could print at least one out as I don't know how to split a screen to compare. I found the China- Russian one straight away, but no luck on the Canadian-US one. As I was comparing them word for word on the 3rd page of the printed doc. I noticed the Eurasian Belt and Road and was like WOA. Something is not right, Biden and Trudeau would never be talking about that so.... I stopped comparing at that point and wanted to let you know asap, because I knew you would check it out thoroughly. Let me know if there is any news fit to print:)
Thanks for that thorough work, Helene. I didn't listen as carefully as you but my impression is that Corbett wasn't saying Canada and Russia had the same document. He was making a rhetorical point by first reading it as IF it came from Trudeau, where everyone's nodding along and saying, of course, we knew it, he's in the WEF's pocket.
And then he does that little glitch in the middle where he makes the switch and reveals it's been a Russian document all along. As I wrote, "But halfway through he reveals the ruse—everything that’s supposedly written by Trudeau is actually from Putin detailing his agenda in line with the Great Reset."
It's confusing to follow because of that, and the title, but I believe that he wants to catch out people--maybe like Ehret in Montreal--who would be willing to believe it about Trudeau but unwilling to believe it about Putin, even with the same evidence. Does that make sense?
Hi Tereza, I viewed James Corbett’s episode titled SHOCKING Document Reveals Trudeau's REAL Plan! So it looks to me that the document was actually a Russian-China Document put out by China Aerospace Studies Institute. It came right up when I googled it. Here is a link to the pdf: https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/CASI/documents/Translations/2022-02-04%20China%20Russia%20joint%20statement%20International%20Relations%20Entering%20a%20New%20Era.pdf Notice how James skips the paragraph at time 9:44-10:30 where it talks about the EAEU and the belt and road initiative. I also could not find a US- Canadian joint statement for that date because it never happened. Let me know if you find out anything different. PS: that Matt Ehret link was a good one. I missed it last year, because I didn't know about him at the time. I swear I was introduced to him by you. Thanks for connecting the world of Truth Seekers.
Interesting. I'll check that out.
Stimulating and thought provoking.
I better watch the whole thing. I missed the joke part. lol I just thought he was saying that both joint statements said the same thing and were supposedly real.
Pre Covid I was MicroPolar but post Covid, I am MacroPolar. Sweet deal for the Globalists.
I'm not sure if I understand. Do you mean that you agree with Matt that we do need symmetrical power of large alliances with China and Russia to push back against the WEF? Or that YOU are the globalist that wants all power in one macropole, nyaahaha! Finally, we know who's behind all the machinations. It's Bull Dog!
I don't think there's anything I can say or do that won't offend you, noosfera. I have no idea why your Substack was deleted and neither do you. Is it because of your content on the Russian Great Reset or because other Substackers filed complaints about posting multiple blog-length comments and insulting them on their sites?
On the link you posted, Matt Ehret seemed very receptive to the information you sent to his email, after he couldn't get it from your site. After three prompts the same day from you, he writes, "Racing against deadlines and interview. Your email is received and appreciated. I'm tracking the cybernetics cult in Russia and China since the 1950s which makes your links high value for me. Thank you." If your motivation is to get the information out, that seems like a good thing. Yet you say he "doesn't want to read: he wants to know about one of my comments."
James Corbett agrees with you that Putin is on board with the Great Reset. But that's not enough for you. You recommend Riley Waggaman to me, but now you call him softened. I'm not sure how you wanted me to refer to you in citing you on my post but I won't make that mistake again.