Funny about Maryanne Williamson- I saw a video of hers that was super cringe. I haven’t been able to look at her the same since. She strikes me as someone who maybe read the books we read but attempts to use them as manipulative weapons. I could be wrong. But just getting that vibe.
Thank you, my anti-labelist friend, and for restacking the quote. As I said there, this is perfectly consistent for you since the label is a way to 'other.' I question if the 'other' exists. I am you and you are me and we are all together ... we are the walrus ;-)
Etiquette questiin for you. I responded to the restack before I saw this response in my activity feed. Do you think it more proper to put the response in the original comment or the restack, or both? I feel like substack should be doing the heavy lifting in these types of cases, by copying a response into the restack and visa versa, automatically.
I have written this in response to seeing a 30 year long pardigm shift re: neurodiversity still 30 years away after 30 years . And why no one seems to scutinise this as both a fact and a asumtion .
Beautiful, Tereza.
Funny about Maryanne Williamson- I saw a video of hers that was super cringe. I haven’t been able to look at her the same since. She strikes me as someone who maybe read the books we read but attempts to use them as manipulative weapons. I could be wrong. But just getting that vibe.
Thanks for the herstory lesson.
Thank you, my anti-labelist friend, and for restacking the quote. As I said there, this is perfectly consistent for you since the label is a way to 'other.' I question if the 'other' exists. I am you and you are me and we are all together ... we are the walrus ;-)
Etiquette questiin for you. I responded to the restack before I saw this response in my activity feed. Do you think it more proper to put the response in the original comment or the restack, or both? I feel like substack should be doing the heavy lifting in these types of cases, by copying a response into the restack and visa versa, automatically.
I have written this in response to seeing a 30 year long pardigm shift re: neurodiversity still 30 years away after 30 years . And why no one seems to scutinise this as both a fact and a asumtion .
https://simonedwards101379.substack.com/p/built-to-prevent-paradigm-shifts?utm_source=share&utm_medium
=android&r=8lgfr1
What relevance does this have to my article?